The Russian Blanquists and the Hague Congress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Russian Blanquists and the Hague Congress ROLF H. W. THEEN, ed. and trans. The Russian Blanquists and the Hague Congress The proceedings of the Hague Congress of 1872 were over- shadowed by the personal conflict between Marx and Bakunin. In a sense, however, this personal conflict was a reflection of a deeper issue-viz., the confrontation of two revolutionary traditions, whose point of departure, direction, and temperament differed signi- ficantly. Although the Congress ended in the political victory of Marx, in the eyes of many contemporaries and in the judgment of later writers, Marx suffered a moral defeat.' Moreover, the political triumph of Marx over Bakunin turned out to be a Pyrrhic victory. The first International had led a precarious existence ever since the Basel Congress of 1869 and the fall of the Paris Commune, which ended the hopes of the socialists for an early revolution in Europe. But it was the Hague Congress which gave the coup de grace to the First International. And after 1872 Marx himself had hardly any following outside of Germany. Among the interesting, but little known consequences of the Hague Congress was the formation of an ideological (and later organiza- tional) alliance between the French Blanquists and a group of Rus- sian and Polish revolutionaries who later became known as the Russian Jacobins or Russian Blanquists.2 Very little is known about the origin, the composition and the activities of this group, which made its debut on the historical stage in 1871-1872 in Switzerland and-probably because of its multinational character-became known as Slavianskii kruzhok or Cercle slave It was this group which a 1. Cf. Fritz Brupbacher, Marx und Bakunin: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Internationalen Arbeiterassoziation (Miinchen, n.d.), especially pp.. 124, 132 ff., and Eduard Bernstein, "Karl Marks i russkie revoliutsionery," Minuvshie gody, no. 11 (1908), pp. 1-24. Recently a number of documents have been published which throw new light on Bakunin's role in the International. See Arthur Lehning, ed., Archives Bakounine, vol. II: Michel Bakounine et les conflits dans L'Internationale 1872 (Leiden, 1965) and Michael Confino, "Bakunin et Necaev," Cahiers du monde russe et sovietique, VII, no. 4 (Oct.-Dec. 1966, 581-699. Another useful collection of relevant documents is found in Jacques Freymond, ed., La Premi6re Internationale (Geneve, 1962), II. 2. On the relationship between the French Blanquists and the Russian Jaco- bins, see B. Nikolaevskii, "Pamiati poslednego 'iakobintsa' semidesiatnika ( Gaspar-Mikhail Turskii)," Katorga i ssylka, no. 2 (23) (1926), pp. 214 ff., and E. Kusheva, "Iz istorii 'Obshchestva Narodnogo Osvobozhdeniia,"' Katorga i ssylka, no. 4 (77) (1931), pp. 32 ff. 3. Cf. B. P. Koz'min, Iz istorii revoliutsionnoi mysli v Rossii (Moscow, 1961), pp. 364-365. For a more detailed discussion of the formation of the Cercle slave group, see Nikolaevskii, op. cit., pp. 216 ff, and T. G. Snytko, Russkoe narodni- chestvo i pol'skoe obshchestvennoe dvizhenie 1865-1881 gg. (Moscow, 1969), pp. 117 ff. few years later established the journal Nabat (Le Tocsin)' and, being critical of both Bakunin and Lavrov, developed a third orien- tation in Russian social thought of the 1870's. Like their French confreres, the Russian Blanquists were critical of the International and its program of revolution for Europe. However, above all, they questioned the applicability of the theoretical and practical program of the International to Russia and the feasibility of transplanting its organizational principles to their native soil. As is well-known, this issue, defined in larger dimensions, was to determine the relations between Russian revolutionaries and European socialists for years to come5 After the Hague Congress the French Blanquists published a pro- test under the title of Internationale et Revolution? which was imme- diately translated into Russian by the Cercle slave and published, together with a special foreword, in a lithographed edition in Zurich in 1873.' This pamphlet constitutes the earliest documentary evi- dence of the existence of a group of Russian Blanquists outside Russia. In many respects, the foreword to this brochure, written especially for the Russian edition, may be regarded as the first pub- lished manifesto of the Russian Jacobins abroad. In it they expressed their contempt for the International, their lack of faith in the revolu- tionary potential of the masses, and their disillusionment with "peace- ful propaganda." Anticipating the ideas later developed by Nabat, they called for "a well-organized conspiracy" and the "employment in the battle of all the means [used by] our enemies." During 1873-1874 the Russian Blanquists also began to define their relationship to the Russian revolutionary movement. In a letter to Avenir national, dated April 24, 1873,' they expressed their dis- 4. The journal Nabat was published irregularly in Geneva and London during the years 1875-1881. P. N. Tkachev, the most important theoretician of Russian Blanquism, edited the journal during 1875-76 and contributed articles to Nabat until 1879. The journal owed its existence mainly to the initiative of Gaspar (Kaspar) M. Turskii. 5. This question, for example, was the central issue in Tkachev's polemic with Friedrich Engels. (See P. Tcatschoff, Offener Brief an Herrn Friedrich Engels [Zurich, 1874]. Engels replied in Volksstaat, nos. 36-37, 43-45 (1875), in an article entitled "Flüchtlingsliteratur."). See also N. K. Mikhailovskii. "Po povodu russkago izdaniia knigi Karla Marksa," in Sochineniia (St. Petersburg, 1913), 2nd ed., X, 2-11; "Nashi zadachi," Nedelia, no. 1 (1876); and Iuzov, "Kapitalizm i mirskoe vladenie," Nedelia, no. 15 (1878). 6. Cf. Internationale et Revolution. A propos du Congres de la Haye. Par des Refugies de la Commune, ex-membres du Conseil General de l'Interna- tionale (London, 1872). The pamphlet was written by E. Vaillant (it was signed by A. Arnaud, F. Cournet, Margueritte, Constant-Martin, G. Ranvier, and E. Vaillant) and is dated Sept. 15, 1872. According to Guillaume, it was published in November, 1872. (See James Guillaume, L'Internationale [Paris, 1909], III, 20). 7. Cf. Internatsional i revoliutsiia. Po povodu Gagskago Kongressa (Zurich, 1873). The Russian edition of Vaillant's pamphlet was republished, with a different foreword, in 1876 by the Nabat group. (See Internatsional i revolivtsiia, [Geneve: Tipografiia zhurnala Nabat, 1876]). The foreword to this re-edition has recently been published in French translation in Lehning, op. cit., pp. 369-370. Apparently the group which was responsible for publishing the lithographed edition of Internatsional i revolivtsiia in 1873 made an attempt to distribute the pamphlet in Russia. On Dec. 14, 1873, nine copies of it were confiscated at the Austro-Russian border. (TsGAOR, Moscow, Fond III otdeleniia, Delo 495, pt. I, 1873, p. 3). 8. Cf. Vpered, vol. 3 (1875) pt. III, pp. 109-110. The declaration is reprinted in J. M. Meijer, Knowledge and Revolution: The Russian Colony in Zuerich 1870-1873 (Assen, 1955), pp. 202-203, n. 41. .
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Encyclopedia
    Jewish Encyclopedia The History, Religion, Literature, And Customs Of The Jewish People From The Earliest Times To The Present Day Volume XII TALMUD – ZWEIFEL New York and London FUNK AND WAGNALLS COMPANY MDCCCCVI ZIONISM: Movement looking toward the segregation of the Jewish people upon a national basis and in a particular home of its own: specifically, the modern form of the movement that seeks for the Jews “a publicly and legally assured home in Palestine,” as initiated by Theodor Herzl in 1896, and since then dominating Jewish history. It seems that the designation, to distinguish the movement from the activity of the Chovevei Zion, was first used by Matthias Acher (Birnbaum) in his paper “Selbstemancipation,” 1886 (see “Ost und West,” 1902, p. 576: Ahad ha – ‘Am, “Al Parashat Derakim,” p. 93, Berlin, 1903). Biblical Basis The idea of a return of the Jews to Palestine has its roots in many passages of Holy Writ. It is an integral part of the doctrine that deals with the Messianic time, as is seen in the constantly recurring expression, “shub shebut” or heshib shebut,” used both of Israel and of Judah (Jer. xxx, 7,1; Ezek. Xxxix. 24; Lam. Ii. 14; Hos. Vi. 11; Joel iv. 1 et al.). The Dispersion was deemed merely temporal: ‘The days come … that … I will bring again the captivity of my people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof … and I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land” (Amos ix.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Anarchists: the Heroic Years, 1868-1936
    The Spanish Anarchists THE HEROIC YEARS 1868-1936 the text of this book is printed on 100% recycled paper The Spanish Anarchists THE HEROIC YEARS 1868-1936 s Murray Bookchin HARPER COLOPHON BOOKS Harper & Row, Publishers New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, London memoria de Russell Blackwell -^i amigo y mi compahero Hafold F. Johnson Library Ceirtef' "ampsliire College Anrteret, Massachusetts 01002 A hardcover edition of this book is published by Rree Life Editions, Inc. It is here reprinted by arrangement. THE SPANISH ANARCHISTS. Copyright © 1977 by Murray Bookchin. AH rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission except in the case ofbrief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address ftee Life Editions, Inc., 41 Union Square West, New York, N.Y. 10003. Published simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Toronto. First HARPER COLOPHON edition published 1978 ISBN: 0-06-090607-3 78 7980 818210 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 21 Contents OTHER BOOKS BY MURRAY BOOKCHIN Introduction ^ Lebensgefahrliche, Lebensmittel (1955) Prologue: Fanelli's Journey ^2 Our Synthetic Environment (1%2) I. The "Idea" and Spain ^7 Crisis in Our Qties (1965) Post-Scarcity Anarchism (1971) BACKGROUND MIKHAIL BAKUNIN 22 The Limits of the Qty (1973) Pour Une Sodete Ecologique (1976) II. The Topography of Revolution 32 III. The Beginning THE INTERNATIONAL IN SPAIN 42 IN PREPARATION THE CONGRESS OF 1870 51 THE LIBERAL FAILURE 60 T'he Ecology of Freedom Urbanization Without Cities IV. The Early Years 67 PROLETARIAN ANARCHISM 67 REBELLION AND REPRESSION 79 V.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Italians and the IWMA'
    Levy, Carl. 2018. ’The Italians and the IWMA’. In: , ed. ”Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth”. The First International in Global Perspective. 29 The Hague: Brill, pp. 207-220. ISBN 978-900-4335-455 [Book Section] https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/23423/ The version presented here may differ from the published, performed or presented work. Please go to the persistent GRO record above for more information. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Goldsmiths, University of London via the following email address: [email protected]. The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. For more information, please contact the GRO team: [email protected] chapter �3 The Italians and the iwma Carl Levy Introduction Italians played a significant and multi-dimensional role in the birth, evolution and death of the First International, and indeed in its multifarious afterlives: the International Working Men's Association (iwma) has also served as a milestone or foundation event for histories of Italian anarchism, syndicalism, socialism and communism.1 The Italian presence was felt simultaneously at the national, international and transnational levels from 1864 onwards. In this chapter I will first present a brief synoptic overview of the history of the iwma (in its varied forms) in Italy and abroad from 1864 to 1881. I will then exam- ine interpretations of aspects of Italian Internationalism: Mazzinian Repub- licanism and the origins of anarchism, the Italians, Bakunin and interactions with Marx and his ideas, the theory and practice of propaganda by the deed and the rise of a third-way socialism neither fully reformist nor revolutionary, neither Marxist nor anarchist.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx, Bakunin, and the Question of Authoritarianism - David Adam
    Marx, Bakunin, and the question of authoritarianism - David Adam Historically, Bakunin’s criticism of Marx’s “authoritarian” aims has tended to overshadow Marx’s critique of Bakunin’s “authoritarian” aims. This is in large part due to the fact that mainstream anarchism and Marxism have been polarized over a myth—that of Marx’s authoritarian statism—which they both share. Thus, the conflict in the First International is directly identified with a disagreement over anti-authoritarian principles, and Marx’s hostility toward Bakunin is said to stem from his rejection of these principles, his vanguardism, etc. Anarchism, not without justification, posits itself as the “libertarian” alternative to the “authoritarianism” of mainstream Marxism. Because of this, nothing could be easier than to see the famous conflict between the pioneering theorists of these movements—Bakunin and Marx—as a conflict between absolute liberty and authoritarianism. This essay will bring this narrative into question. It will not do this by making grand pronouncements about Anarchism and Marxism in the abstract, but simply by assembling some often neglected evidence. Bakunin’s ideas about revolutionary organization lie at the heart of this investigation. Political Philosophy We will begin by looking at some differences in political philosophy between Marx and Bakunin that will inform our understanding of their organizational disputes. In Bakunin, Marx criticized first and foremost what he saw as a modernized version of Proudhon’s doctrinaire attitude towards politics—the
    [Show full text]
  • Marx and the Politics of the First'international
    This article was downloaded by: [York University Libraries] On: 07 September 2014, At: 15:14 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Socialism and Democracy Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/csad20 Marx and the Politics of the First International George C. Comninel Published online: 08 Aug 2014. To cite this article: George C. Comninel (2014) Marx and the Politics of the First International, Socialism and Democracy, 28:2, 59-82, DOI: 10.1080/08854300.2014.918451 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2014.918451 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Bernstein and Engels
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Probabilism and determinism in political economy: the case of Bernstein and Engels Wells, Julian The Open University 3 February 1998 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55325/ MPRA Paper No. 55325, posted 22 Jan 2020 09:07 UTC Probabilism and determinism in political economy The case of Bernstein and Engels Julian Wells The Open University I: Introduction Eduard Bernstein’s proposals for revising marxist theory Rather, it is to examine the intellectual sources of his burst like a thunderclap on the late 19th century workers’ error, and in particular to examine Bernstein’s views on movement, and in particular on the German social the determinism which he maintained was a central feature democracy. Here was the militant who had suffered 20 of the historical materialist method. This is important, years of exile, whose editorship of the party newspaper had because—as I claimed in passing in a previous IWGVT made it such a powerful weapon, the acquaintance of Marx paper (Wells 1997) but did not substantiate—there is a and the friend and literary executor of Engels, saying in pervasive atmosphere of determinism in the thought of terms that their scientific method was so fatally flawed that many marxists, which is, however, unjustified by anything it should be fundamentally recast. to be found in the works of Marx and Engels. Not only that, but Marx’s forecasts about the The paper will first review Bernstein’s critique of Marx development of capitalism, made on the basis of this and Engels, and suggest that his misunderstanding is not method, were not only untenable but had already been simply attributable to any personal scholarly exposed by events.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Marx's Theory of the State and Opposition to Anarchism
    Interpreting Marx's Theory of the State and Opposition to Anarchism Though Marx intended to dedicate a volume of Capital to the question of 'the State', he died before he could even begin that work. We are, therefore, left to reconstruct the 'Marxist theory of the state' from scattered references littered throughout Marx and Engels' collected works. My analysis investigates the shifts and contradictions in their thought, as well as the utility these contradictions served in misrepresenting the anarchist alternative. By Matthew Crossin “… no state, howsoever democratic its forms, not even the reddest political republic… is capable of giving the people what they need: the free organisation of their own interests from below upward…" - Mikhail Bakunin, Statism and Anarchy, p. 24 “[With the abolition of classes] the power of the State, which serves to keep the great majority of the producers under the yoke of the numerically small exploiting minority, disappears, and the functions of government are transformed into simple administrative functions. [The anarchists] put matters the other way round…” - Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, Fictitious Splits in the International, p. 74 1 Marxism, Anarchism, and the State The purpose of this essay is to reassess the views of Karl Marx, his close partner Friedrich Engels, and their anarchist contemporaries on the crucial question of ‘the State’.2 Specifically, I contend that dominant interpretations of Marx have unsatisfactorily addressed his varied and contradictory analysis of the State; its role (if any) in the construction of a socialist society; and the ways in which this has both overlapped and come into conflict with the anarchist view.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conflict in the International Workers’ Association, 1864-1877
    Political conflict in the International Workers’ Association, 1864-1877 A W Zurbrugg INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 2 German Socialism .........................................................................................6 The International in France ..........................................................................10 Politics in Switzerland .................................................................................13 Politics Elsewhere .......................................................................................14 The International in Switzerland .................................................................18 The Basel Congress .....................................................................................22 Unity, Debate and Expulsion .......................................................................25 Accountability and Control .........................................................................30 Delusions .....................................................................................................37 A Non-sectarian International? ....................................................................39 The Ongoing International ...........................................................................57 Conclusion ...................................................................................................69 Appendix 1: The Basel Congress of the International, 1869. ......................77 [A] Summary and extracts of the report
    [Show full text]
  • Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention Against
    United Nations CAC/COSP/WG.3/2007/INF.1/Final Conference of the States Parties Distr.: Limited to the United Nations 2 October 2007 Convention against Corruption English/French/Spanish Open-ended Intergovernmental Expert Working Group on Technical Assistance Vienna, 1 to 2 October 2007 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS States Parties Algeria Tahar ABDELLAOUI, Directeur de la Coopération Juridique et Judiciaire, Ministère de la Justice Mohamed Abdou BENHELLA, Magistrat, membre de la Cellule de Traitement du Renseignement Financier Nabil HATTALI, Chargé de Mission auprès de la Présidence de la République Zohra ZERARA, Secrétaire Diplomatique, Mission Permanente d'Algéria auprès de I'Office des Nations Unies (Vienne) Angola Fidelino Loy de Jesus FIGUEIREDO, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations (Vienna), Chef de la Délégation Dulce GOMES, First Secretary, Advisor to the Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations (Vienna) Argentina Eugenio M CURIA, Embajador, Representante Permanente de la República Argentina (Viena) D. Gabriel E. PARINI, Ministro, Representante Permanente Alterno de la República Argentina (Viena) Australia Gaynor SHAW, Development Advisor, Permanent Mission of Australia to the United Nations (Vienna) Nicola ROSENBLUM, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Australia to the United Nations (Vienna) Austria Thomas STELZER, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Austria to the United Nations (Vienna), Head of Delegation Gerlinde WAMBACHER, Federal Ministry of the Interior Roland UNTERKÖFLER, Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Maoist’ Group
    The Marxist Volume XXI, No. 4 October-December 2005 Anil Biswas ‘Maoism’: An Exercise in Anarchism In recent times, some areas of West Bengal have witnessed activities of the ‘Maoist’ group. The group has tried to draw attention to itself through committing several grisly murders and by triggering some explosions. They are engaged in setting up ‘bases’ in the remote and relatively inaccessible locales of West Bengal that border Bihar-Jharkhand. They seek a foothold in some other districts of the state as well. A section of the corporate media has also been encouraging them, by legitimising the Maoists’ killing of CPI (M) leaders and workers in districts like Bankura, Purulia, and Midnapore west. The CPI (M-L)-People’s War and the Maoist Communist Centre, two groups of the Naxalite persuasion, came together on 21 September 2004 to form a new party, the CPI (Maoist). As with the two erstwhile constituents, the Maoists are active in selected areas of Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, and Jharkhand. Because of the secretive style of their working, their political outlook and activities are largely unknown to the mass of the people. The name of the CPI (Maoist) has been associated with violent acts and spreading terror. Going by their programme and ideological stand, the party is a violent anarchist outfit. Anarchy can cause harm to the democratic struggle and Left movement. The CPI (M) will counter this party politically and ideologically. The CPI (M) formed after a long ideological debate in 1964, and a new Party Programme was adopted. Sectarian and ultra-left adventurist trends arose in the ongoing struggle against revisionism and reformism.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Marx and the Iwma Revisited 299 Jürgen Herres
    “Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth” <UN> Studies in Global Social History Editor Marcel van der Linden (International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Sven Beckert (Harvard University, Cambridge, ma, usa) Dirk Hoerder (University of Arizona, Phoenix, ar, usa) Chitra Joshi (Indraprastha College, Delhi University, India) Amarjit Kaur (University of New England, Armidale, Australia) Barbara Weinstein (New York University, New York, ny, usa) volume 29 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/sgsh <UN> “Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth” The First International in a Global Perspective Edited by Fabrice Bensimon Quentin Deluermoz Jeanne Moisand leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Cover illustration: Bannière de la Solidarité de Fayt (cover and back). Sources: Cornet Fidèle and Massart Théophile entries in Dictionnaire biographique du mouvement ouvrier en Belgique en ligne : maitron-en -ligne.univ-paris1.fr. Copyright : Bibliothèque et Archives de l’IEV – Brussels. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Bensimon, Fabrice, editor. | Deluermoz, Quentin, editor. | Moisand, Jeanne, 1978- editor. Title: “Arise ye wretched of the earth” : the First International in a global perspective / edited by Fabrice Bensimon, Quentin Deluermoz, Jeanne Moisand. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2018] | Series: Studies in global social history, issn 1874-6705 ; volume 29 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018002194 (print) | LCCN 2018004158 (ebook) | isbn 9789004335462 (E-book) | isbn 9789004335455 (hardback : alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism As a Cultural Movement?
    REVIEW ESSAY Ahlrich Meyer SOCIALISM AS A CULTURAL MOVEMENT? WEBER, PETRA. Sozialismus als Kulturbewegung. Fruhsozialistische Ar- beiterbewegung und das Entstehen zweier feindlicher Bruder Marxismus und Anarchismus. [Beitrage zur Geschichte des Parlamentarismus und der politischen Parteien, Band 86.] Droste Verlag, Diisseldorf 1989. 545 pp. DM 98.00. There is nothing wrong in tackling the intellectual history of social move- ments from a contemporary interest and perspective. Such an approach often uncovers things previously buried under the debris of received wis- dom. Moreover, early socialism, the topic under discussion here, has long been used as a screen on which to project topical ideological arguments. This dissertation by Petra Weber on the "early socialist labour movement and the rise of the two hostile brothers Marxism and anarchism" (thus the subtitle), sponsored by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, supervised by Profes- sor Heinrich August Winkler and Professor Wilhelm Hennis and published by the Bonn Commission on Parliamentary History and Political Parties, is the latest attempt to respond to "the demand for alternative concepts of socialism" (p. 13) by recalling socialist traditions preceding and contempo- raneous with Marx. The author stresses primarily two themes in her at- tempted actualization: firstly she highlights the much neglected continuity between early socialism and anarchism and endeavours to reverse the suppression of anarchism from the history of socialism, and secondly she relies on the change of paradigm in sociohistorical research pioneered by E. P. Thompson and others by adopting a broad notion of "working-class culture" and the labour movement as a "cultural movement". Together these provide the thesis of her book, namely that "the continuity of early socialism and anarchism must be sought in its self-image as a cultural movement" (p.
    [Show full text]