DOCSLIB.ORG

Structure Form Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structure Form Manual Guide to the Historical Structure Form Version 5.0 Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources Bureau of Historic Preservation March 2019 Guide to the Historical Structure Form, v5 .0 Page| 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Shaded Areas: An Explanation ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Digital PDF Forms, an Alternative to Paper Forms ............................................................................................................ 5 REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS FOR THE HISTORICAL STRUCTURE FORM ...................................................................................... 6 General Requirements for Attachments ........................................................................................................................... 6 USGS 1:24,000 Scale Topographic Maps (Required) ...................................................................................................... 6 Street or Large Scale map (Required) .............................................................................................................................. 6 Photographs (Required) ................................................................................................................................................. 6 FIELD DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE HISTORICAL STRUCTURE FORM ............................................................................................. 8 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Original / Update ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Recorder # ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Site Name(s) .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Multiple Listing # - for use by Site File staff only – leave blank ......................................................................................... 9 Survey Project Name ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 FMSF Survey # - for use by Site File staff only – leave blank ............................................................................................. 9 National Register Category ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Ownership .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 LOCATION & MAPPING ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Address ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Cross Streets ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 USGS 7.5' Map Name & Date ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Plat or other map ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 City/Town .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 In City Limits? .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 County ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Township, Range & Section .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Township ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Range .......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Section ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 ¼ Section .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Tax Parcel #’s ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Landgrant .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Subdivision Name ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Block ........................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Lot # ............................................................................................................................................................................ 13 UTM Coordinates.......................................................................................................................................................... 13 UTM: Zone .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 UTM: Easting ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 UTM: Northing .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Other Coordinates ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Name of Public Tract .................................................................................................................................................... 14 HISTORY ........................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Construction Year ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Original Use, Current Use and Other Use ....................................................................................................................... 14 Moves .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Alterations ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Additions ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Guide to the Historical Structure Form, v5 .0 Page| 3 Architect ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Builder ......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Ownership History ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 Is the Resource Affected by Local Preservation Ordinance? ........................................................................................... 15 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Style ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 6. the Tudors and Jacobethan England
    6. The Tudors and Jacobethan England History Literature Click here for a Tudor timeline. The royal website includes a history of the Tudor Monarchs [and those prior and post this period]. Art This site will guide you to short articles on the Kings and Queens of the Tudor Music Dynasty. Another general guide to Tudor times can be found here. Architecture Click here for a fuller account of Elizabeth. One of the principle events of the reign of Elizabeth was the defeat of the Spanish Armada (here's the BBC Armada site). Elizabeth's famous (and short) speech before the battle can be found here. England's power grew mightily in this period, which is reflected in the lives and achievements of contemporary 'heroes' such as Sir Francis Drake, fearless fighter against the Spanish who circumnavigated the globe, and Sir Walter Raleigh (nowadays pronounced Rawley), one of those who established the first British colonies across the Atlantic (and who spelt his name in over 40 different ways...). Raleigh is generally 'credited' with the commercial introduction of tobacco into England .about 1778, and possibly of the potato. On a lighter note, information on Elizabethan costume is available here (including such items as farthingales and bumrolls). Literature Drama and the theatre The Elizabethan age is the golden age of English drama, for which the establishment of permanent theatres is not least responsible. As performances left the inn-yards and noble houses for permanent sites in London, the demand for drama increased enormously. While some of the smaller theatres were indoors, it is the purpose-built round/square/polygonal buildings such as The Theatre (the first, built in 1576), the Curtain (late 1570s?), the Rose (1587), the Swan (1595), the Fortune (1600) and of course the Globe (1599) that are most characteristic of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Architecture, Part 4: Academic Revival Styles
    TECH TALK MINNESOTA HISTORICAL Minnesota’s Architecture • Part IV SOCIETY THE ACADEMIC REVIVAL STYLES by Charles Nelson Historical Architect, Minnesota Historical Society NOTE: Words marked with an asterisk (*) are as a necessary part of each student’s education, and discussed briefly in the glossary on p. 6. aspiring architects ventured throughout Europe and This is the Britain to fill sketch books with details from antiquity. fourth in a According to many historians, the World’s With the aid of modern technology and materials, series of five Columbian Exposition of 1893 heralded the end of the these details were translated into contemporary Tech Talk Victorian era. Held in Chicago, the Exposition articles on building designs. Hence, the resulting styles came to Minnesota’s brought together the talents of architects from across be called “Academic” Revivals. They remained architectural the country to create the “White City,” hundreds of popular through the 1930s until World War II. styles. acres of exposition halls, pavilions, sculpture gardens The next one is and promenades—all linked by a man-made canal scheduled for Neo-Classic Revival the Jan. 2000 system. As was the case with the Centennial The Neo-Classic Revival style is noted for its issue of The Exposition 17 years earlier, the Columbian monumental scale, colonnaded porticoes and classical Interpreter. Exposition’s promoters regarded it as an event that ornament, used in public buildings and residences would popularize the “cutting edge” of taste and alike. The influence of the Beaux Arts movement is design. When the scale, expense and impact of the Columbian Exposition are considered in comparison A Few Facts about the with previous—as well as later—expositions or fairs, Columbian Exposition of 1893 it may be considered to have had the greatest impact The event ultimately cost more than $28 million, on society of all the others up to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosha County Intensive Survey Report
    Intensive Survey of Rural Kenosha County Including the towns of Somers, Paris, Brighton, Wheatland, and Randall By Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 For Wisconsin Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019 Acknowledgments The following persons or organizations assisted in completing this project: Legacy Architecture, Inc. Jennifer L. Lehrke, Principal Historic Preservation Consultant Kenosha County Historical Society & Rowan Davidson, Historic Preservation Consultant Kenosha History Center Robert Short, Historic Preservation Consultant Jonathan Martens, Exhibition & Collections Gail Biederwolf, Administrative Services Coordinator Specialist Wisconsin Historical Society Others State Historic Preservation Office Kathy Emery Daina Penkiunas, State Historic Preservation Officer Jackie Klapproth Peggy Veregin, National Register Coordinator Chris Kraidich Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Rachel Muhlenbeck Amy Wyatt, Historic Preservation Specialist Callie Rucker Charles Soper Kenosha County Robin Therese Tom Beaudry, Information Technology Deborah Vos Andy Buehler, Director, Department of Planning & Development Ben Fiebelkorn, Senior Land Use Planner Patricia Pendleton, GIS Coordinator Scott Schutze, Director, County Land Information Office Cheryl Schroeder, Office of the Register of Deeds The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with the Wisconsin State Historic Preservation
    [Show full text]
  • Maxwell Craven, '“Great Taste and Much Experience in Building”: Richard Leaper: Amateur Architect', the Georgian Group J
    Maxwell Craven, ‘“Great Taste and Much Experience in Building”: Richard Leaper: Amateur Architect’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XVIII, 2010, pp. 152–172 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2010 ‘GREAT TASTE AND MUCH EXPERIENCE IN BUILDING’: RICHARD LEAPER, AMATEUR ARCHITECT MAXWELL CRAVEN Amateur architects are a diverse bunch. Some Derby in – , and in had married Sarah, aristocrats like the Hon. Roger North, Sir Roger sister of Archer Ward, also on the bank’s board and a Pratt, Lord Burlington and the fifth Earl Ferrers, keen Baptist. Richard was educated at Derby School, indulged themselves in designing buildings, for becoming a member of the Corporation in , themselves or others, and were able to apply themselves being elected Mayor in – and made an to the occasional practice of architecture without alderman shortly thereafter. He served as Mayor having to rely on it for a living. It was rarer for a again in , and , by which time he was, municipal grandee to turn his hand to architecture, like his father before him, also a partner in the bank. but a notable example was Richard Leaper of Derby, For some years he was also Chief Distributor of four times Mayor of his town, partner in the family Government Stamps and lived for the first half of his bank, distributor of stamps and proprietor of a adult life at No. Friar Gate (a house of upon tanning firm. Indeed, with so crowded a curriculum which he seems to have left no discernible vitae, one might well ask whether he had time for any architectural impression); he died in .
    [Show full text]
  • Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667
    Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aidan Francis Cottrell-Boyce, Gonville and Caius College, June 2018. For Anna. Abstract In the seventeenth century, in England, a remarkable number of small, religious movements began adopting demonstratively Jewish ritual practices. They were labelled by their contemporaries as Judaizers. Typically, this phenomenon has been explained with reference to other tropes of Puritan practical divinity. It has been claimed that Judaizing was a form of Biblicism or a form of millenarianism. In this thesis, I contend that Judaizing was an expression of another aspect of the Puritan experience: the need to be recognized as a ‘singular,’ positively- distinctive, separated minority. Contents Introduction 1 Singularity and Puritanism 57 Judaizing and Singularity 99 ‘A Jewish Faccion’: Anti-legalism, Judaizing and the Traskites 120 Thomas Totney, Judaizing and England’s Exodus 162 The Tillamites, Judaizing and the ‘Gospel Work of Separation’ 201 Conclusion 242 Introduction During the first decades of the seventeenth century in England, a remarkable number of small religious groups began to adopt elements of Jewish ceremonial law. In London, in South Wales, in the Chilterns and the Cotswolds, congregations revived the observation of the Saturday Sabbath.1 Thomas Woolsey, imprisoned for separatism, wrote to his co-religionists in Amsterdam to ‘prove it unlawful to eat blood and things strangled.’2 John Traske and his followers began to celebrate Passover
    [Show full text]
  • North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan
    4 Beaumont Road NORTH ROSEDALE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN Prepared by: E.R.A. Architects Inc. 10 St. Mary St. Suite 801 Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1P9 Date: May 03 2004 North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan AA MMeessssaaggee ffrroomm tthhee PPrreessiiiddeenntt ooff tthhee NNoorrtthh RRoosseeddaalllee RRaatteeppaayyeerrss AAssssoocciiiaattiiioonn Fellow North Rosedale Residents: The North Rosedale Ratepayers Association is pleased to enclose a copy of the Heritage Study for North Rosedale. This study has been in the works for more than 15 months. Our Heritage Committee, chaired by John Hogarth, and more than 50 volunteers have worked together, guided by E.R.A. Architects Inc. The study provides a brief but interesting history of the early development of North Rosedale. Additional research, including a photograph and other information for each of the 917 residential properties in North Rosedale, is now available on our upgraded web site (www.northrosedale.ca). This report, describing the heritage merits of North Rosedale, is the result of the tremendous enthusiasm and many hours of labour on the part of a group of community-minded volunteers. We hope this study provides North Rosedale residents – present and future -- with a clear link to the origins of their community. It presents a strong rational for the adoption of a historical district for North Rosedale. The initiative and costs were underwritten by the NRRA, and supported by the help and donations of generous individuals in our community, as well as the City of Toronto. The study has found that North Rosedale’s streetscapes have significant heritage value with 51% of the homes rated as having historical merit.
    [Show full text]
  • I © Copyright 2015 Elizabeth Anne Scarbrough
    © Copyright 2015 Elizabeth Anne Scarbrough i The Aesthetic Appreciation of Ruins Elizabeth Anne Scarbrough A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Ronald Moore, Chair Jean Roberts Michael Rosenthal Alison Wylie Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Philosophy ii University of Washington Abstract The Aesthetic Appreciation of Ruins Elizabeth A. Scarbrough Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Ronald Moore, Professor Philosophy Department It is the goal of my dissertation to explain our peculiar aesthetic fascination with architectural ruins and to show why ruins are worthy of our time and aesthetic appreciation. I propose a model of aesthetic appreciation specific to ruins, one that not only presents a methodology of interpreting and evaluating ruins, but also suggests how we ought to preserve and display these objects of immovable material culture. I discuss four key examples: Bannerman Castle (Fishkill, New York), Mỹ Sơn Archaeological Site (Quảng Nam Province, Việt Nam), Gas Works Park (Seattle, Washington), and the recent “rust belt” ruins (Detroit, Michigan). Before proceeding to my aesthetic account I propose a definition of “ruins”—a difficult task for many reasons. Foremost, it is not clear when a structure sufficiently decays to become a ruin or when a ruin sufficiently decays to become a pile of rocks and cease being a ruin. This is a classic example of the sorites paradox. If one seeks a definition of “ruins” that delineates such rigid markers as necessary and jointly sufficient conditions, the project is hopeless. I define “ruins” from the perspective of social ontology, where I argue these objects are partially constituted by their communities viewing them as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Balboa Park Historic Context Statement
    Draft - 8/3/08 Historic Context Statement Balboa Park Area Plan & Historic Resource Survey San Francisco, California August 3 2008 Prepared for the San Francisco Planning Department prepared by TBA West, Inc. 631 Pointe Pacific Drive #6, Daly City, California 94014 650.756.8888 / www.tbaarchitects.com 1 Draft - 8/3/08 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Theme…………………………………………………………...3 A. Time Period B. Period of Significance C. Geographic Limits II. Synthesis of Information/History 6 A. Natural History B. Native Americans C. Spanish-Mexican Periods D. American Period 1. The Industrial School 2. House of Correction/Ingleside Jail 3. San Francisco and San Jose Railroad 4. Ocean Avenue Corridor a. Ingleside Coursing Park b. Ingleside Jail 5. Residential Development 6. Balboa Park - a Rationalistic park 7. Balboa Park Area Transportation History 8. Westwood Park 9. Commercial Development 10. Demographic Patterns III. Balboa Park Area Plan: Architecture 26 A. Property Types B. Commercial Corridors C. Architectural Styles in Subject Area IV. Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..47 V. Appendices 48 A. Study Area Map B. Inventory of Construction Dates, Type, Styles C. Inventory of Character Defining Features 2 Draft - 8/3/08 Exhibit 1: Subject Area, 1878 map of San Francisco, UCLA. I. Introduction and Themes The Balboa Park Area (Subject Area) acts as a hub and boundary line in San Francisco, a crossroad between the Ingleside, Westwood Park, Sunnyside, Excelsior and Outer Mission neighborhoods. It also acts as a crossroad of historic themes: Balboa Park embodies distinctive characteristics of 20th Century recreational landscaping, as naturalistic, romantic treatments of city parks gave way to more rationalistic uses, including the incorporation of civic structures and game fields.
    [Show full text]
  • 5151 WISSAHICKON AVE Name of Resource
    ADDRESS: 5151 WISSAHICKON AVE Name of Resource: Robeson Lea Perot House Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: American Legion, North City Post Nominator: Keeping Society of Philadelphia Staff Contact: Meredith Keller, [email protected] OVERVIEW: This nomination proposes to designate the building at 5151 Wissahickon Avenue and list it on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The nomination contends that the building satisfies Criterion for Designation D. Under Criterion D, the nomination argues that the house, designed by owner and architect Robeson Lea Perot in 1905, embodies distinguishing characteristics of the Tudor Revival style of architecture. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the nomination demonstrates that the building at 5151 Wissahickon Avenue satisfies Criterion for Designation D. 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with an Office of Property Assessment address) Street address:__________________________5151 Wissahickon Avenue ________________________________________ Postal code:_______________19144 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name:___________________________Robeson Lea Perot Residence _______________________________________ Current/Common Name:___________________________________________________________American Legion Post 263 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE ✔ Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair ✔ poor ruins Occupancy: ✔ occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use:____________________________________________________________________Club
    [Show full text]
  • Lockerbie Square Historic District Amendment (Boundary Increase) and Or Common 2
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only * a g National Register of Historic Places received Inventory—Nomination Form dateenterecjJUL £ 8 I987|- See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name historic Lockerbie Square Historic District Amendment (Boundary Increase) and or common 2. Location Bounded by New Jersey Street on the west, Michigan Street on the street & number north, Davidson Street on the east, and New York StreetN/Anot for publication on the south city, town Indianapolis N/A vicinity of state Indiana code 018 county Marion code 097 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use J( _ district public X occupied agriculture** museum Y building(s) A private unoccupied X commercial park structure both work in progress _X _ educational X private residence sive Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment _X _ religious object in process _ yes: restricted government scientific being considered ^ _ yes: unrestricted __ industrial transportation N/A no military Other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Please see continuation sheets street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Marion County Assessor's Office street & number City-County Building, 200 E. Washington Street city, town Indianapolis state Indiana 6. Representation in Existing Surveys ;>ee continuation sneer title Indianapolis Regional Center Survey,/ has this property been determined eligible? __yes X_ no date 1985 federal state county local Indiana Department of Natural Resources depository for survey records Division nf HistnHr.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Styles & Their Characteristics Old House Guide 1
    Architectural Styles & Their Characteristics Old House Guide 1. brief history of style: from where? years? 2. theory? 3. defining characteristics of style: roof, materials, doors, windows, chimney 4. variations/style differences 5. commonalities between styles, referred to as…, often misinterpreted as… 6. SD architects of style, examples, & pictures Spanish Influenced Architecture Only Spain ranks with England in the establishment of architectural traditions in the U.S. which has greatly influenced Southern California. These traditions first arrived with the Padres who traveled up from Mexico to Northern CA. Some secular buildings accompanied the missionaries, but earnest settlement began during the 1830’s. The 1850’s had Spanish Colonial traditions exposed and combined with Anglo architectural traditions. With many resurgences of Spanish architecture, after WWI Spanish influenced architecture waned on the national level. Mission Style (c. 1600-1820) 1. missions of CA were provincal, frontier manifestations of exuberant Churrigueresque style of the Spanish Counter reformation, especially as it developed in the prosperous colonial centers of Mexico. 2. high boroque style of twin bell towers, curved gables, sumptuous ornament applied to plain masonry walls, with dramatic interior lighting was reinterpreted in CA by the untrained priests who mixed elements of the neo-classical orders with that of the Churrigueresque style and vernacular architecutural traditions of the native homes in Spain. Lack of skilled architectural training, coupled with limited trade skills and limited resources culminated with a more refined structure whose beauty lies in the simple massing of its elements and ornamented by simple arches that were often repeated in long, low arcades. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Teori Arsitektur 03
    TEORI ARSITEKTUR 3 ARSITEKTUR MODERN DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA FAKULTAS TEKNIK PRODI ARSITEKTUR JL. Ahmad Yani Pontianak 78124 telp. (0561) 740186. 736439 kotak pos 1049 dosen penanggung jawab: Hamdil Khaliesh, ST. •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany
    [Show full text]