Demanding Spaces: 1970S U.S. Women's Novels As Sites of Struggle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses November 2017 Demanding Spaces: 1970s U.S. Women's Novels as Sites of Struggle Kate Marantz University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the American Literature Commons Recommended Citation Marantz, Kate, "Demanding Spaces: 1970s U.S. Women's Novels as Sites of Struggle" (2017). Doctoral Dissertations. 1107. https://doi.org/10.7275/10552139.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1107 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEMANDING SPACES: 1970s U.S. WOMEN’S NOVELS AS SITES OF STRUGGLE A Dissertation Presented By KATE MARANTZ Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2017 English © Copyright by Kate Marantz 2017 All Rights Reserved DEMANDING SPACES: 1970s U.S. WOMEN’S NOVELS AS SITES OF STRUGGLE A Dissertation Presented By KATE MARANTZ Approved as to style and content by: Asha Nadkarni, Chair Emily Lordi, Member Mecca Jamilah Sullivan, Member Randall Knoper, Department Head Department of English DEDICATION For Gwen, Nell, and Esme. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While writing this dissertation, I have relied upon so many for guidance and encouragement; it is their support, as much as my efforts, that made this project possible. I first want to thank my advisors Professor Asha Nadkarni and Professor Emily Lordi, whose brilliant and generous insights have guided my work for much of my time at UMass and throughout this project. As chair of my dissertation, Asha has been a consistent, thoughtful, and critical reader, always conveying her belief in the importance of my ideas while also pushing me further in my thinking. More than that, she has been such a positive presence for me as I’ve navigated my years in graduate school, willing to listen, commiserate, and be a cheerleader for me when I needed it. I greatly admire Asha’s sharp intelligence and breadth of knowledge, as well as her kindness and dedication to mentorship. I feel extremely fortunate to know her and to have had her direct this dissertation. And I am very thankful to Emily, in whose graduate courses, along with Asha’s, I began to explore the intersections of space, movement, gender, and race in literature. Emily’s excitement about my work, her careful critiques of my writing, and her insightful suggestions for further reading have been invaluable to me throughout my dissertation. I always look to her writings—socially engaged, aesthetically grounded, and eloquently, forcefully expressed—as models for my own. I am so happy that I have had the opportunity to work with her. In addition, I wish to thank my committee member Professor Mecca Jamilah Sullivan, whose thoughtful and generative feedback on early sections of my dissertation has v resonated throughout my writing process. I am grateful, as well, for the many other professors, staff, and colleagues I came to know in the English Department and the Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Department at UMass, with special thanks to those who read and heard versions of chapters in dissertation workshops and at the WGSS graduate conference. And I want to thank Professor Deborah Carlin, who was a challenging and fiercely loyal mentor to me in my first few years of graduate school. As was the case with so many other students, I held tightly to Deborah’s faith in me as I moved through the program. She was the most intimidatingly intelligent and personally invested teacher I’ve ever had, and she is greatly missed. I am lucky to have friends who also consistently push and broaden my thinking while providing unwavering support. Thank you to Jess, who was my plus-one and partner-in- crime for most of graduate school. It was by watching her capably navigate the world of academia that I grew more comfortable in my own roles as researcher, speaker, and instructor; it was in talking with her over glasses of wine and on road-trips to conferences that I worked out many of my ideas for the dissertation. Jess is an incredibly generous friend and colleague, and I’ve had a blast with her. Thank you to Katie, my “twin,” my oldest and most ever-present, loyal friend since age three. I am in awe of Katie’s embodiment of a seemingly impossible combination of intelligence and approachability, pragmatism and positivity, selflessness and self-possession. Whether we’re in Minnesota or Montevideo, she has always been there to ask questions, give advice, and cheer me on, and I am so grateful for her. And thank you to my Skidmore girls, Ta, Jamie, Justine, Liz, vi Dido, and Joce, such beautiful, bright, accomplished women. Our lasting friendships have sustained me and made me who I am. I am so grateful to my close-knit, fun-loving, politically engaged family. In particular, I want to thank my cousins Eve and Mae. They were by my side in Greece and Ghana as I put last-minute touches on my graduate school applications; they humored my insanity and showed me strength and love; they keep me laughing and always will. Thank you to my sister Nell. Since I can remember, I have aspired to be as cool, smart, stylish, and independent as Nell, and I’m still trying. In times of dance-filled celebration and profound hardship, she has been a constant, reassuring presence, and I feel very fortunate to so deeply know and be known by her. Thank you also to her daughter Esme, who is probably the most powerful girl I know. And thank you to my mother and father, Gwen and Tom. I could not ask for more giving, loving, and feminist parents, and none of this would have been possible if not for their support, sympathy, and encouragement. Lastly, I want to express my gratitude to two other members of my family. To Penny the dog, for having the softest ears and never asking for anything but walks and treats and love. And to Phil, for keeping me going. It was soon after Phil and I met that I began this dissertation, and every step of the way he has been there with the pep-talks, distractions, and tough love I needed to continue writing even when it felt impossible. He has shown me what it means to be a caring, humble, and generous partner, and has been willing to share and bring me into his own amazing family, for which I am so grateful. Phil is my best friend, and I’m excited for our next adventure and all the ones to come. vii ABSTRACT DEMANDING SPACES: 1970s U.S. WOMEN’S NOVELS AS SITES OF STRUGGLE SEPTEMBER 2017 KATE MARANTZ, B.A., SKIDMORE COLLEGE M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Asha Nadkarni This dissertation offers a new view of 1970s gender and race politics in the United States by analyzing struggles in and over space in four women’s novels: Joan Didion’s Play It As It Lays (1970), Toni Morrison’s Sula (1973), Alice Walker’s Meridian (1976), and Marilyn French’s The Women’s Room (1977). My project reads space as a dynamic, politically charged realm of interactions between lived bodies, physical landscapes, and imaginative territories—including the formal characteristics of fiction. Using this critical lens, I highlight how these authors interrogate conditions of sexism and racism by representing their characters making and responding to “demands” for space. These demands occur through embodied, geographically oriented claims—claims to move freely, choose locations, construct one’s surroundings—as well as symbolic attempts to make room for new subjectivities, realign marginal positions, and establish common ground. The authors I consider also mirror these spatial struggles onto the innovative structures of their narratives through shifting voices and uneven or fragmented textual patterns, so that the novels themselves become “demanding spaces” of social action in form as well as content. By attending to these multilayered spaces in a group of texts viii published across the 1970s but never before placed in conversation, I shed new light on the intersections and frictions among feminist and other social movements of this time period. Just as importantly, I emphasize the possibilities in narrative for enacting and remapping those movements across the stretches of the published page. My reading of Play It As It Lays shows Didion expressing suspicion towards linear trajectories of women’s liberation by depicting impeded physical movements and blocked conversations and plots, while pointedly ignoring racial and classed inflections of mobility. I suggest that Morrison’s Sula explores the power and contingency of black female relationships through the interdependent movements of two young women, situating their journeys within a broader geographical and narrative landscape across which social inequities are marked out but also challenged. In Meridian, I contend, Walker self-consciously presents her titular character’s body—and the body of the text surrounding her—as mediums for negotiating ideological stances, so that the formulation of “the personal as political” is revealed as crucially important but also particularly burdensome for black women. In The Women’s Room, I find French cynically doubting women’s ability to “make room” for themselves through claiming their physical freedom as well as independent stories, but in presenting a purportedly universalized vision of women’s (lack of) liberation, French further marginalizes—even on the level of narration—the experiences of African Americans and women of color across the globe.