Ammonium Sulfate Cas N°: 7783-20-2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Effects of Different Sources of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Growth and Nutrition of Western Hemlock Seedlings
Effects of Different Sources U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest of FertiIizer Nitrogen and Range Experiment Station Research Paper PNW-267 on Growth and Nutrition oJ February 1980 Western Hemlock Seedlings ---. --_. ------------------------ , I _J Authors M. A. RADWAN is Principal Plant Physiologist and DEAN S. DeBELL is Principal Silviculturist with the Forest Service, u.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Olympia, Washington. En gl ish Equivalents 1 liter 0.2642 gallon 1 kilogram = 2.2046 pound 1 gram = 0.0353 ounce 1 centimeter = 0.3937 inch 1 kilogram per hectare 1.1206 pounds per acre (9/50C) + 32 = of EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF FERTILIZER NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND NUTRITION OF WESTERN HEMLOCK Reference Abstract Radwan, M. A. , and Dean S. DeBell. 1980. Effects of different sources of fertilizer nitrogen on growth and nutrition of western hemlock seedlings. USDA For. Servo Res. Pap. PNW-267, 15 p. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. Twelve different nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments were tested on potted western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf. ) Sarg.) seedlings. Fertilizers affected soil N and pH, and growth and foliar chemical com position of seedlings. Ura plus N-Serve and sulfur-coated urea appear more promising for promoting growth than other fertilizers tested. Results, however, do not explain reported variability in response of hemlock stands to N fertilization. Keywords: Nitrogen fertilizer response, seedling growth, western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla. RESEARCH SUMMARY Research Paper PNW-267 1980 The following fertilization treatments were applied in the spring to potted, 4-year-old western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf. -
Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: a Short Review
sustainability Review Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: A Short Review Adele Folino 1, Demetrio Antonio Zema 1,* and Paolo S. Calabrò 2 1 Department Agraria, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department Diceam, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Via Graziella, Località Feo di Vito, I-89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: One of the most promising systems to treat swine wastewater is air stripping. This system simultaneously recovers nitrogen salts, to be used as fertiliser, and reduces the organic pollutant load in the effluents of swine breeding farms. Several reviews have discussed the air stripping as a treatment for many types of industrial wastewater or nitrogen-rich digestate (the liquid effluent derived from the anaerobic digestion plants) for the stripping/recovery of nutrients. However, reviews about the use of air stripping as treatment for raw or anaerobically digested swine wastewater are not available in literature. To fill this gap, this study: (i) Summarises the experiences of air stripping for recovery of ammonium salts from both raw and digested swine wastewater; and (ii) compares air stripping efficiency under different operational conditions. Moreover, combined systems including air stripping (such as struvite crystallisation, chemical precipitation, microwave radiation) have been compared. These comparisons have shown that air stripping of raw and digested swine wastewater fits well the concept of bio-refinery, because this system allows the sustainable management of the piggery effluent by extracting value-added compounds, by-products, and/or energy from wastewater. -
Listed Toxic Air Contaminants and Common Chemicals
Listed Toxic Air Contaminants and Common Chemicals (sorted by Chemical name) CHEMICAL NAME CAS # Listed Air Toxic 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 Y 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane 811972 Y 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79345 Y 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 Y 1,1-Difluoroethane (HCFC 152a) 75376 Y 1,1-Dimethyl hyrazine 57147 Y 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene 95636 N 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 Y 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 Y 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 Y 1,2-Dimethyl hyrazine 540738 Y 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (Hydrazobenzene) 122667 Y 1,2-Epoxybutane 106887 Y 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine) 75558 Y 1,3-Butadiene 106990 Y 1,3-Dichloropropene 542756 Y 1,3-Propane sultone 1120714 Y 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p-Dichlorobenzene) 106467 Y 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) 123911 Y 1-Chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (CFC 142B) 75683 Y 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 540841 Y 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 Y 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 Y 2,4-and 2,6-Toluene diisocyanateh 26471625 Y 2,4-Diaminoanisole 615054 Y 2,4-Diaminotoluene 95807 Y 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, salts & esters 94757 Y (2,4-D) 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 Y 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 Y 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 Y 2,4-Toluene diamine (2,4-Diaminotoluene) 95807 Y 2-Acetylaminofluorene 53963 Y 2-Aminoanthraquinone 117793 Y CHEMICAL NAME CAS # Listed Air Toxic 2-Chloroacetophenone 532274 Y 2-Chlorophenol 95578 Y 2-Nitropropane 79469 Y 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidene 91941 Y 3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine 119904 Y 3,3'-Dimethyl benzidine 119937 Y 4,4-Methylene bis (2-chloroaniline) 101144 Y 4,4-Methylenedianiline 101779 Y 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol -
Material Safety Data Sheet Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate Hexahydrate MSDS
He a lt h 1 0 Fire 0 1 0 Re a c t iv it y 0 Pe rs o n a l Pro t e c t io n E Material Safety Data Sheet Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate MSDS Section 1: Chemical Product and Company Identification Product Name: Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate Contact Information: Catalog Codes: SLF1990 Sciencelab.com, Inc. 14025 Smith Rd. CAS#: 7783-85-9 (Hexahydrate); 10045-89-3 (anhydrous) Houston, Texas 77396 RTECS: BR6500000 US Sales: 1-800-901-7247 International Sales: 1-281-441-4400 TSCA: TSCA 8(b) inventory: No products were found. Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate hexahydrate is not TSCA listed Order Online: ScienceLab.com because it is a hydrate. CHEMTREC (24HR Emergency Telephone), call: CI#: Not applicable. 1-800-424-9300 Synonym: Ammonium ferrous sulfate, hexahydrate; Iron International CHEMTREC, call: 1-703-527-3887 ammonium sulfate hydrate; Sulfuric acid, ammomium iron For non-emergency assistance, call: 1-281-441-4400 (2+) salt, hexahydrate Chemical Name: Ammonium iron (II) sufate, hexahydrate (2:1:2:6) Chemical Formula: FeSO4(NH4)2SO4.6H2O Section 2: Composition and Information on Ingredients Composition: Name CAS # % by Weight Ferrous ammonium sulfate 7783-85-9 100 hexahydrate (Hexahydrate); 10045-89-3 (anhydrous) Toxicological Data on Ingredients: Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate: ORAL (LD50): Acute: 3250 mg/kg [Rat]. Section 3: Hazards Identification Potential Acute Health Effects: Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Potential Chronic Health Effects: p. 1 CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. -
Ammonium Chloride As a Nitrogen Fertilizer: Chloride Ion
AMMONIUM CHLORIDE AS A NITROGEN FERTILIZER: CHLORIDE ION EFFECTS ON YIELDS AND UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY CROPS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Woodson Teater, B.S., M.S. The Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: Adviser Department of Agronomy AC KNOWLED GEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation and thanks to Dr. H. J. Mederski under whose supervision and guidance this study was conducted; to Dr. G. W. Volk for his advice, encouragement, and criticism of the manu script; and to Dr. E. 0. McLean and Dr. C. J. Willard for criticism and assistance in preparing the manuscript. Thanks is also extended to other faculty members and graduate students of the Department of Agronomy for their assistance and cooperation during the course of the study. The author is grateful for the financial assistance provided by the Columbia Southern Chemical Corporation through a grant-in-aid agreement with the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. For her patience and assistance the author is deeply grateful to his wife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION............................. 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ' . 5 NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION................ 12 I. GENERAL FIELD STUDIES MATERIALS AND METHODS. * .............................. 13 Soil, Crops, and Fertilizers....................... 13 Sampling and Harvesting............................ 14 Analytical Procedures.............................. 15 EXPERIMENTAL........................................... 21 Comparison of Ammonium Chloride and Ammonium Sulfate in Broadcast Applications for Continuous Corn.................................... 21 Procedure........................................ 21 Results and Discussion.......................... 21 Comparison of Ammonium Chloride and Ammonium Sulfate in Row Applications for Corn............... 30 Procedure....................................... -
Sulfuric Acid Aerosol Is Formed by the Oxidation of SO in Standard, NH /N ) Diluted to 2 RELATIVE HUMIDITY (RH) 3 2 Gas/Aqueous/Aerosol Phase
INVESTIGATIONS OF THE HETEROGENEOUS REACTION BETWEEN AMMONIA AND SULFURIC/SULFUROUS ACID AEROSOLS Thomas Townsend, Colette Noonan and John R. Sodeau Centre for Research into Atmospheric Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University College Cork, and Environmental Research Institute, Cork, Ireland. [email protected] INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP AMMONIA (100ppm Sulfuric acid aerosol is formed by the oxidation of SO in standard, NH /N ) diluted to 2 RELATIVE HUMIDITY (RH) 3 2 gas/aqueous/aerosol phase. The preferred form of sulfuric acid tuned between 1% and 70%. ppb range. Admitted to flow AEROSOL GENERATION tube via a 6mm diameter in the aerosol phase is ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4. If there H2SO4 /C2H2O4 aerosol Dilution Unit movable, glass injector. is not enough ammonia present, sulfuric acid exists either as generated by passing a flow (200-500 ccm) of air over a P H2SO4(aq) or NH4HSO4. heated solution or via a nebuliser. AEROSOL FLOW-REACTOR Aerosols AerosolAerosol Humidifier Generator Made of glass, ID: 10cm, maximal ….are tiny particles suspended in the air. Those larger than reactive length Z: 80cm. Aerosol Flow Carrier Flow Operated at room temperature and Soluble trace gases such as Ammonia, about 1μm in size are mainly produced by windblown dust Comp. Air atmospheric pressure. NH3, are produced from agricultural and sea-spray. Aerosols smaller than 1μm are mostly formed Unit by condensation processes e.g. conversion of SO gas released PARTICLE SIZER (SMPS) sources and represents a significant 2 from volcanic eruptions to sulfate-type particles. Monitors aerosol fraction, NH3/N2 atmospheric pollutant in Ireland. particle size, mass, surface SMPS CHEMILUMINESCENCE area, volume. -
Orca Corrosion Chart
Unsaturated Polyester Vinylster (Epoxy Acrylate Resins) CHEMICAL Conc Resins NO ISO BIS Novolac Bromine ENVIRONMENT % 511/512 301 585 570 545/555 A 1 Acetaldehyde 20 NR 40 40 40 2 Acetic Acid 10 80 100 100 100 3 Acetic Acid 15 60 100 100 100 4 Acetic Acid 25 60 100 100 100 5 Acetic Acid 50 - 80 80 80 6 Acetic Acid 75 NR 65 65 65 7 Acetic Acid, Glacial 100 NR NR 40 NR 8 Acetic Anhydride 100 NR NR 40 NR 9 Acetone 10 NR NR 80 80 10 Acetone 100 NR NR NR NR 11 Acetonitrile 20 - 40 40 40 12 Acetyl Acetone 20 - 40 50 40 13 Acrolein (Acrylaldehyde) 20 - 40 40 40 14 Acrylamide 50 NR 40 40 40 15 Acrylic Acid 25 NR 40 40 40 16 Acrylic Latex All - 80 80 80 17 Acrylonitrile Latex Dispersion 2 NR 25 25 25 Activated Carbon Beds, Water 18 - 80 100 80 Treatment Adipic Acid(1.5g solution in 19 23 - 80 80 80 water at 25℃, sol in hot water) 20 ALAMINE amines - 65 80 65 21 Alkyl(C8-10) Dimethyl Amine 100 - 80 100 80 22 Alkyl(C8-10) Chloride All - 80 100 95 23 Alkyl Benzene Sulfonic Acid 90 NR 50 50 50 Alkyl Tolyl Trimethyl 24 - - 40 50 40 Ammonium Chloride 25 Allyl Alcohol 100 NR NR 25 NR 26 Allyl Chloride All NR 25 25 25 27 Alpha Methylstyrene 100 NR 25 50 25 28 Alpha Oleum Sulfates 100 NR 50 50 50 29 Alum Sat'd 80 100 120 100 30 Aluminum Chloride Sat'd 80 100 120 100 31 Aluminum Chlorohydrate All - 100 100 100 32 Aluminum Chlorohydroxide 50 - 100 100 100 33 Aluminum Fluoride All - 25 25 25 34 Aluminum Hydroxide 100 80 80 95 80 35 Aluminum Nitrate All 80 100 100 100 36 Aluminum Potassium Sulfate Sat'd 80 100 120 100 37 Aluminum Sulfate Sat'd 80 100 120 100 -
Honeywell Sulf-N® 26: a New Fertilizer for a New World
Honeywell Sulf-N® 26: A New Fertilizer for a New World What’s at stake How Sulf-N® 26 can help Seven billion people need to eat every day and we need nitrogen fertilizers Powerful agricultural benefits to feed them …but nitrate fertilizers can be unsafe Safe to handle, transport, and store to transport and store …and nitrate fertilizers, especially ammonium nitrate, can be used Low detonation potential to make explosives Powerful agricultural benefits Equal or better crop yields and quality for a broad range of crop and soil combinations In multiple crop tests pitting Sulf-N® 26 • Dry solid fertilizer, 26-0-0-14S • 26% nitrogen (N) and 14% sulfur (S), against various combinations of nitrogen two essential nutrients plants need to thrive and sulfur fertilizers, Sulf-N® 26 has • Both critical forms of nitrogen delivered equal or superior crop yields - 6.5% nitrate nitrogen for early green up and quality. For grains, vegetables, tree - 19.5% ammonium nitrogen for healthier root zone crops, and berries – Sulf-N® 26 delivers. • Sulfate form of sulfur - Sulfate is immediately available to plants unlike other forms of sulfur - Plants need sulfur for maximum nitrogen uptake Compatibility with phosphorus Compatibility Ease of - World soils are increasingly sulfur and potassium with urea application deficient fertilizers Improves operational efficiency Difficult Ammonium nitrate Moderate Low “sugars” in hot, • Blends with other fertilizers and humid climates crop-protection chemicals unlike Calcium Moderate Good ammonium nitrate (AN) ammonium nitrate Moderate • Stable when stored with urea even in humid climates Urea High — Good - Retains particle integrity Sulf-N® 26 High High Good - Does not “sugar” like AN Safe to handle, transport, and store Safe to handle • Classified as non-hazardous • Safe to handle and apply unlike Ammonium nitrate accidents have killed other fertilizers such as anhydrous ammonia or injured thousands of people and cost • Can be safely impregnated with ® petroleum based pesticides billions of dollars. -
United States Patent (19) (11 3,954,955 Furkert (45) *May 4, 1976
United States Patent (19) (11 3,954,955 Furkert (45) *May 4, 1976 54 PROCESS FOR WORKING UP THE WASH Engineering, Duan Nostrand Co., N.Y., N.Y., 1932, SOLUTION OBTAINED IN THE WASHING pp. 1-3. OF SOCONTAINING OFF-GASES 75) Inventor: Herbert Furkert, Grosskonigsdorf, Primary Examiner-Oscar R. Vertiz Germany Assistant Examiner-Gary P. Straub 73) Assignee: Davy Powergas GmbH, Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Millen, Raptes & White Cologne-Braunsfeld, Germany * Notice: The portion of the term of this patent subsequent to Mar. 5, 1991, 57 ABSTRACT has been disclaimed. In a process which comprises scrubbing an SO 22 Filed: Aug. 30, 1972 containing gas with an aqueous ammonia solution to form ammonium sulfite and ammonium bisulfite as re (21) Appl. No.: 284,709 action products, neutralizing said reaction products Related U.S. Application Data with sulfuric acid to form SO, and aqueous ammo nium sulfate, and concentrating the resultant aqueous 63 Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 228,258, Feb. 22, ammonium sulfate by evaporation, the improvement 1972, Pat. No. 3,795,731. which comprises: 30 Foreign Application Priority Data a heating the concentrated aqueous ammonium sulfate to a temperature of 900-1250°C in a Aug. 31, 197 Germany............................ 2143444 combustion chamber burning a carbon or sulfur containing fuel, in the presence of sufficient 52 U.S. Cl.............................. 423/541 A; 423/242 oxygen to maintain an oxygen content of 1-10 vol (5) Int. Cl..................... C01B 17160; C01B 17/50 % in the gas exiting from the combustion (58) Field of Search........... 423/522,539, 541, 542, chamber, to form a hot split gas consisting 4231544, 545, 547, 550, 242, 523 essentially of sulfur dioxide, sulfur trioxide, molecular nitrogen, molecular oxygen and water (56) References Cited vapor; and UNITED STATES PATENTS b. -
List of Lists
United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B-10-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response May 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/emergencies LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right- To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act • EPCRA Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances • CERCLA Hazardous Substances • EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Chemicals • CAA 112(r) Regulated Chemicals For Accidental Release Prevention Office of Emergency Management This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................................ i List of Lists – Conslidated List of Chemicals (by CAS #) Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act ................................................. 1 Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Consolidated List ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Radionuclides Listed Under CERCLA .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: RCRA Waste Streams and Unlisted Hazardous Wastes................................................ C-1 This page intentionally left blank. LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals -
Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L
Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L. McCormick and Teresa L. Alleman National Renewable Energy Laboratory Janet Yanowitz Ecoengineering, Inc. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-69001 September 2017 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L. McCormick and Teresa L. Alleman National Renewable Energy Laboratory Janet Yanowitz Ecoengineering, Inc. Prepared under Task No. VTOP.10335.04.01.03 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5400-69001 Golden, CO 80401 September 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. -
Investigation of the Solar Hybrid Photo-Thermochemical Sulfur-Ammonia Water Splitting Cycle for Hydrogen Production Agni E
361 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS The Italian Association VOL. 45, 2015 of Chemical Engineering www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Petar Sabev Varbanov, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi, Jun Yow Yong, Xia Liu Copyright © 2015, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-36-5; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1545061 Investigation of the Solar Hybrid Photo-Thermochemical Sulfur-Ammonia Water Splitting Cycle for Hydrogen Production Agni E. Kalyvaa, Ekaterini Ch. Vagiaa, Athanasios G. Konstandopoulosb, Arun R. Srinivasac, Ali T-Raissid, Nazim Muradovd, Konstantinos E. Kakosimos*,a aTexas A&M University at Qatar, Chemical Engineering Department, Sustainable Energy Research Laboratory (SERL), PO Box 23874, Doha, Qatar bChemical Process Engineering Research Institute, Aerosol and Particle Technology Laboratory (APTL), Center for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH/CPERI), P.O. Box 361, 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece cTexas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College Station, TX 77843-3123, USA dFlorida Solar Energy Center, University of Central Florida, Cocoa, FL 32922, USA [email protected] Hydrogen is currently being used in many industries, from chemical and refining to metallurgical, glass and electronics, while being at the same time a promising energy carrier. Therefore the need for hydrogen is experiencing a very rapid growth. At the same time, the traditional hydrogen production methods (e.g., steam methane reforming, water electrolysis) are energy and resources intensive. Thus, research focus is on sustainable technologies that can produce hydrogen in an economic and environmental friendly way. Hydrogen production via a solar driven hybrid sulfur-ammonia water splitting cycle (HySA) developed at Florida Solar Energy Center is such a promising technology.