DOCSLIB.ORG

Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 2 Grades Available: Soluble Fines and Standard Grade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 2 Grades Available: Soluble Fines and Standard Grade Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 2 grades available: Soluble Fines and Standard Grade DESCRIPTION: AN ECONOMICAL SOLUBLE FORM OF QUICK GREENING NITROGEN WITH HIGH SULFUR. GUARANTEED ANALYSIS: TOTAL NITROGEN (N) ...............................................................................................................................................................................................21.00% 21.00% Ammoniacal Nitrogen Sulfur (S) ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................24.00% Derived from Ammonium Sulfate BENEFITS: BEST® AMMONIUM SULFATE 21-0-0 is a quick acting form of water soluble nitrogen that stimulates vegetative growth and produces deep green color. contains high sulfur (24%) to enhance decomposition of thatch through stimulation of soil micro-organisms, improves color and density of turf. is a very economical form of nitrogen and sulfur. is a very high quality, screened crystalline material that is not produced as a result of any by-product manufacturing process. APPLICATION RATES: TURFGRASS: Lbs. of Actual Lbs. BEST Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 Lbs. BEST Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 Lbs. of Actual Nitrogen desired To Apply per To Apply per Sulfur Applied *Recommended Rate per 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. Acre per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.50 ............................................... 2.4 ..............................................................105 ........................................0.58 0.75 ............................................... 3.6 ..............................................................157 ........................................0.86 1.00* .............................................. 4.8* ............................................................209* .......................................1.15* Application at the recommended rates will last approximately 4 to 6 weeks. GROUNDCOVER: Broadcast at 5 lbs. per 1,000 sq. ft. (½ lb. per 100 sq. ft.) SHRUBS & EVERGREENS: Sprinkle ¼ cup evenly around dripline of plant and work into top 1 inch of soil. TREES: Apply ½ lb. per 1 inch of trunk diameter. Distribute evenly under branches out to dripline. NOTE: Liquid measuring cups are very close in estimating the weight of dry granular fertilizers. Example: an 8 oz. (1 cup) measuring cup holds approximately 8 oz. (½ lb.) of dry granular fertilizer. PRODUCT COVERAGE: ONE 50-LB. BAG COVERS 10,400 SQ. FT. Based on the Recommended Turfgrass Rate. 4.2- 50-LB. BAGS COVER 1 ACRE ® SPREADER SETTINGS: BEST Pro .............................................................. 5B Rates are for spreading one ® Listed Settings Will BEST Model 34, 44, 64 ......................................... 4.8 time across in one direction Approximately Apply the Earthway ................................................................. 14 Recommended Turfgrass Rate. Lesco ...................................................................... 14 Scotts R-8A (Cone 6) .............................................. K Lely 1250 / Vicon .................................................... visit www.bestfertilizer.com SGN 150 NOTE: Spreader settings are guidelines only. Spreaders should be checked for accuracy. APPLICATION PRECAUTIONS: Apply to dry turf or foliage and irrigate thoroughly immediately after application. Keep away from pools, ponds, etc. Do not contaminate potable water. PACKAGE SIZE: 50-LB. (22.68-Kg.) BAGS Warning: This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic En- forcement Act of 1986, requires notification of potential exposure to substances identified by the State of California as causing cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. Information regarding the contents and levels of metals in this product is available on the internet at http://www.regulatory-info-jr.com DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES J.R. Simplot Company warrants that the composition of this product conforms to the description and is reasonably fit for the purpose as stated on the label only when used in accordance with label directions under normal conditions of use. This warranty is expressly in lieu of all other warranties and representations expressed, implied, or statutory, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use. Timing, rate and method of application, weather and crop conditions, and mixtures not specifically recommended on this label or an accompanying written recommendation, are beyond the control of the seller. Buyer assumes all risks of use, storage and handling of this material not in strict accordance with directions given herewith. Buyer further agrees in the event of damages resulting from, but not limited to, weather or soil conditions, presence of other materials, or failure to follow label directions will be assumed by the Buyer or User; and to accept a replace- ment of the product or a refund of the purchase price of the product, at buyer’s option, as full discharge of seller’s liability. No one is authorized to make any other warranty, guarantee or directions concerning this product, and no such warranties, guarantees or directions shall be valid or binding upon seller. This product is not considered hazardous under the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) regulations. SIMPLOT®, BEST® is a registered trademark of J.R. Simplot Company. ITEM# 74042_GHS_R12-15-15 Techsheets, SDS and other infor- mation on BEST products available J.R. Simplot Company at www.bestfertilizer.com Professional Products P.O. Box 198 • Lathrop, CA 95330 • (208)336-2110 Customer Service 800-992-6066.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Different Sources of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Growth and Nutrition of Western Hemlock Seedlings
    Effects of Different Sources U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest of FertiIizer Nitrogen and Range Experiment Station Research Paper PNW-267 on Growth and Nutrition oJ February 1980 Western Hemlock Seedlings ---. --_. ------------------------ , I _J Authors M. A. RADWAN is Principal Plant Physiologist and DEAN S. DeBELL is Principal Silviculturist with the Forest Service, u.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Olympia, Washington. En gl ish Equivalents 1 liter 0.2642 gallon 1 kilogram = 2.2046 pound 1 gram = 0.0353 ounce 1 centimeter = 0.3937 inch 1 kilogram per hectare 1.1206 pounds per acre (9/50C) + 32 = of EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF FERTILIZER NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND NUTRITION OF WESTERN HEMLOCK Reference Abstract Radwan, M. A. , and Dean S. DeBell. 1980. Effects of different sources of fertilizer nitrogen on growth and nutrition of western hemlock seedlings. USDA For. Servo Res. Pap. PNW-267, 15 p. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. Twelve different nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments were tested on potted western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf. ) Sarg.) seedlings. Fertilizers affected soil N and pH, and growth and foliar chemical com­ position of seedlings. Ura plus N-Serve and sulfur-coated urea appear more promising for promoting growth than other fertilizers tested. Results, however, do not explain reported variability in response of hemlock stands to N fertilization. Keywords: Nitrogen fertilizer response, seedling growth, western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla. RESEARCH SUMMARY Research Paper PNW-267 1980 The following fertilization treatments were applied in the spring to potted, 4-year-old western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: a Short Review
    sustainability Review Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: A Short Review Adele Folino 1, Demetrio Antonio Zema 1,* and Paolo S. Calabrò 2 1 Department Agraria, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department Diceam, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Via Graziella, Località Feo di Vito, I-89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: One of the most promising systems to treat swine wastewater is air stripping. This system simultaneously recovers nitrogen salts, to be used as fertiliser, and reduces the organic pollutant load in the effluents of swine breeding farms. Several reviews have discussed the air stripping as a treatment for many types of industrial wastewater or nitrogen-rich digestate (the liquid effluent derived from the anaerobic digestion plants) for the stripping/recovery of nutrients. However, reviews about the use of air stripping as treatment for raw or anaerobically digested swine wastewater are not available in literature. To fill this gap, this study: (i) Summarises the experiences of air stripping for recovery of ammonium salts from both raw and digested swine wastewater; and (ii) compares air stripping efficiency under different operational conditions. Moreover, combined systems including air stripping (such as struvite crystallisation, chemical precipitation, microwave radiation) have been compared. These comparisons have shown that air stripping of raw and digested swine wastewater fits well the concept of bio-refinery, because this system allows the sustainable management of the piggery effluent by extracting value-added compounds, by-products, and/or energy from wastewater.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Safety Data Sheet Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate Hexahydrate MSDS
    He a lt h 1 0 Fire 0 1 0 Re a c t iv it y 0 Pe rs o n a l Pro t e c t io n E Material Safety Data Sheet Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate MSDS Section 1: Chemical Product and Company Identification Product Name: Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate Contact Information: Catalog Codes: SLF1990 Sciencelab.com, Inc. 14025 Smith Rd. CAS#: 7783-85-9 (Hexahydrate); 10045-89-3 (anhydrous) Houston, Texas 77396 RTECS: BR6500000 US Sales: 1-800-901-7247 International Sales: 1-281-441-4400 TSCA: TSCA 8(b) inventory: No products were found. Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate hexahydrate is not TSCA listed Order Online: ScienceLab.com because it is a hydrate. CHEMTREC (24HR Emergency Telephone), call: CI#: Not applicable. 1-800-424-9300 Synonym: Ammonium ferrous sulfate, hexahydrate; Iron International CHEMTREC, call: 1-703-527-3887 ammonium sulfate hydrate; Sulfuric acid, ammomium iron For non-emergency assistance, call: 1-281-441-4400 (2+) salt, hexahydrate Chemical Name: Ammonium iron (II) sufate, hexahydrate (2:1:2:6) Chemical Formula: FeSO4(NH4)2SO4.6H2O Section 2: Composition and Information on Ingredients Composition: Name CAS # % by Weight Ferrous ammonium sulfate 7783-85-9 100 hexahydrate (Hexahydrate); 10045-89-3 (anhydrous) Toxicological Data on Ingredients: Ferrous ammonium sulfate hexahydrate: ORAL (LD50): Acute: 3250 mg/kg [Rat]. Section 3: Hazards Identification Potential Acute Health Effects: Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Potential Chronic Health Effects: p. 1 CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Ammonium Chloride As a Nitrogen Fertilizer: Chloride Ion
    AMMONIUM CHLORIDE AS A NITROGEN FERTILIZER: CHLORIDE ION EFFECTS ON YIELDS AND UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY CROPS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Woodson Teater, B.S., M.S. The Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: Adviser Department of Agronomy AC KNOWLED GEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation and thanks to Dr. H. J. Mederski under whose supervision and guidance this study was conducted; to Dr. G. W. Volk for his advice, encouragement, and criticism of the manu­ script; and to Dr. E. 0. McLean and Dr. C. J. Willard for criticism and assistance in preparing the manuscript. Thanks is also extended to other faculty members and graduate students of the Department of Agronomy for their assistance and cooperation during the course of the study. The author is grateful for the financial assistance provided by the Columbia Southern Chemical Corporation through a grant-in-aid agreement with the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. For her patience and assistance the author is deeply grateful to his wife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION............................. 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ' . 5 NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION................ 12 I. GENERAL FIELD STUDIES MATERIALS AND METHODS. * .............................. 13 Soil, Crops, and Fertilizers....................... 13 Sampling and Harvesting............................ 14 Analytical Procedures.............................. 15 EXPERIMENTAL........................................... 21 Comparison of Ammonium Chloride and Ammonium Sulfate in Broadcast Applications for Continuous Corn.................................... 21 Procedure........................................ 21 Results and Discussion.......................... 21 Comparison of Ammonium Chloride and Ammonium Sulfate in Row Applications for Corn............... 30 Procedure.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Honeywell Sulf-N® 26: a New Fertilizer for a New World
    Honeywell Sulf-N® 26: A New Fertilizer for a New World What’s at stake How Sulf-N® 26 can help Seven billion people need to eat every day and we need nitrogen fertilizers Powerful agricultural benefits to feed them …but nitrate fertilizers can be unsafe Safe to handle, transport, and store to transport and store …and nitrate fertilizers, especially ammonium nitrate, can be used Low detonation potential to make explosives Powerful agricultural benefits Equal or better crop yields and quality for a broad range of crop and soil combinations In multiple crop tests pitting Sulf-N® 26 • Dry solid fertilizer, 26-0-0-14S • 26% nitrogen (N) and 14% sulfur (S), against various combinations of nitrogen two essential nutrients plants need to thrive and sulfur fertilizers, Sulf-N® 26 has • Both critical forms of nitrogen delivered equal or superior crop yields - 6.5% nitrate nitrogen for early green up and quality. For grains, vegetables, tree - 19.5% ammonium nitrogen for healthier root zone crops, and berries – Sulf-N® 26 delivers. • Sulfate form of sulfur - Sulfate is immediately available to plants unlike other forms of sulfur - Plants need sulfur for maximum nitrogen uptake Compatibility with phosphorus Compatibility Ease of - World soils are increasingly sulfur and potassium with urea application deficient fertilizers Improves operational efficiency Difficult Ammonium nitrate Moderate Low “sugars” in hot, • Blends with other fertilizers and humid climates crop-protection chemicals unlike Calcium Moderate Good ammonium nitrate (AN) ammonium nitrate Moderate • Stable when stored with urea even in humid climates Urea High — Good - Retains particle integrity Sulf-N® 26 High High Good - Does not “sugar” like AN Safe to handle, transport, and store Safe to handle • Classified as non-hazardous • Safe to handle and apply unlike Ammonium nitrate accidents have killed other fertilizers such as anhydrous ammonia or injured thousands of people and cost • Can be safely impregnated with ® petroleum based pesticides billions of dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Lists
    United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B-10-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response May 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/emergencies LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right- To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act • EPCRA Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances • CERCLA Hazardous Substances • EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Chemicals • CAA 112(r) Regulated Chemicals For Accidental Release Prevention Office of Emergency Management This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................................ i List of Lists – Conslidated List of Chemicals (by CAS #) Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act ................................................. 1 Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Consolidated List ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Radionuclides Listed Under CERCLA .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: RCRA Waste Streams and Unlisted Hazardous Wastes................................................ C-1 This page intentionally left blank. LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L
    Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L. McCormick and Teresa L. Alleman National Renewable Energy Laboratory Janet Yanowitz Ecoengineering, Inc. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-69001 September 2017 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Sulfate Salts in Gasoline and Ethanol Fuels – Historical Perspective and Analysis of Available Data Robert L. McCormick and Teresa L. Alleman National Renewable Energy Laboratory Janet Yanowitz Ecoengineering, Inc. Prepared under Task No. VTOP.10335.04.01.03 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5400-69001 Golden, CO 80401 September 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3: Recipes for TLC Stains
    APPENDIX 3 RECIPES FOR TLC STAINS Staining solutions are ideally stored in 100 mL wide-mouth jars covered with aluminum foil, a watch glass, or a screw cap to mini- mize evaporation. A3.1 GENERAL STAINS Phosphomolybdic Acid (PMA): Dissolve 10 g of phosphomolybdic acid in 100 mL of absolute ethanol. Potassium Permanganate: Dissolve 1.5 g of KMnO4, 10 g of K2CO3, and 1.25 mL of 10% NaOH in 200 mL of water. Vanillin: Dissolve 15 g of vanillin in 250 mL of ethanol and add 2.5 mL of conc. sulfuric acid. p-Anisaldehyde A: To 135 mL of absolute ethanol add 5 mL of conc. sulfuric acid and 1.5 mL of glacial acetic acid. Allow the solution to cool to room temperature. Add 3.7 mL of p- anisaldehyde. Stir the solution vigorously to ensure homogene- ity. Store refrigerated. p-Anisaldehyde B: Prepare a solution of anisaldehyde : HClO4 : acetone : water in the proportions 1 : 10 : 20 : 80. p-Anisaldehyde C: Dissolve 2.5 mL of conc. sulfuric acid and 15 mL of p-anisaldehyde in 250 mL of 95% ethanol. Cerium Molybdate (Hanessian’s Stain): To 235 mL of distilled water add 12 g of ammonium molybdate, 0.5 g of ceric am - monium molybdate, and 15 mL of conc. sulfuric acid. Wrap the jar with aluminum foil as the stain may be somewhat photo-sensitive. The Synthetic Organic Chemist’s Companion, by Michael C. Pirrung Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 171 172 recipes for tlc stains A3.2 SPECIALIZED STAINS Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNP): Dissolve 12 g of 2,4-dinitro- phenylhydrazine, 60 mL of conc.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Addition of Different Nitrogen Sources in the Tequila Fermentation Process at High Sugar Concentration J
    Journal of Applied Microbiology ISSN 1364-5072 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effects of the addition of different nitrogen sources in the tequila fermentation process at high sugar concentration J. Arrizon1,2 and A. Gschaedler1 1 Centro de Investigacio´ n y Asistencia en Tecnologı´a y Disen˜ o del Estado de Jalisco A.C., Guadalajara, Jalisco, Me´ xico 2 Departamento de Ingenierı´a Quı´mica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierı´as, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Me´ xico Keywords Abstract fermentation rate, nitrogen source, tequila, volatile compounds. Aims: To study the effect of the addition of different nitrogen sources at high sugar concentration in the tequila fermentation process. Correspondence Methods and Results: Fermentations were performed at high sugar concentra- ) J. Arrizon, Centro de Investigacio´ ny tion (170 g l 1) using Agave tequilana Weber blue variety with and without Asistencia en Tecnologı´a y Disen˜ o del Estado added nitrogen from different sources (ammonium sulfate; glutamic acid; a de Jalisco A.C., Normalistas 800, Colonia mixture of ammonium sulfate and amino acids) during the exponential phase Colinas de la Normal, Guadalajara, Jalisco C.P. 44270, Mexico. of growth. All the additions increased the fermentation rate and alcohol effi- E-mail: [email protected] ciency. The level of synthesis of volatile compounds depended on the source added. The concentration of amyl alcohols and isobutanol were decreased while 2006/0105: received 25 January 2006, revised propanol and acetaldehyde concentration increased. 7 July 2006 and accepted 11 July 2006 Conclusions: The most efficient nitrogen sources for fermentation rate were ammonium sulfate and the mixture of ammonium sulfate and amino acids.
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Measuring Urinary Iodine Using Ammonium Persulfate (Method A)
    ASSESSMENT OF IODINE DEFICIENCY DISORDERS AND MONITORING THEIR ELIMINATION ANNEX 3 Method for measuring urinary iodine using ammonium persulfate (method A) A3.1 Principle Urine is digested with ammonium persulfate. Iodide is the catalyst in the reduction of ceric ammonium sulfate (yellow) to the cerous form (colourless), and is detected by the rate of colour disappearance (Sand- ell-Kolthoff reaction). A3.2 Equipment Heating block (vented fume hood not necessary), colorimeter, thermom- eter, test tubes (13 x 100 mm), reagent flasks and bottles, pipettes, bal- ance scales. A3.3 Reagents 1. Ammonium persulfate (analytical grade) 2. As2O3 3. NaCl 4. H2SO4 5. Ce(NH4)4(SO4)4∙2H2O 6. Deionized H2O 7. KIO3 A3.4 Solutions 1.0 M Ammonium persulfate: Dissolve 114.1 g H2N2O8S2 in H2O; make up to 500 ml with H2O. Store away from light. The solution is stable for at least one month. 5 N H2SO4: Slowly add 139 ml concentrated (36 N) H2SO4 to about 700 ml deionized water (careful – this generates heat!). When cool, adjust with deionized water to a final volume of 1 litre. Arsenious acid solution: In a 2000 ml Erlenmeyer flask, place 20 g As2O3 and 50 g NaCl, then slowly add 400 ml 5 N H2SO4. Add water to about 1 litre, heat gently to dissolve, cool to room temperature, dilute with water to 2 litres, filter, and store in a dark bottle away from light at room temperature. The solution is stable for months. 66 ANNEX 3. METHOD FOR MEASURING URINARY IODINE USING AMMONIUM PERSULFATE (METHOD A) Ceric ammonium sulfate solution: Dissolve 48 g ceric ammonium sulfate in 1 litre 3.5 N H2SO4.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron (II) Ammonium Sulfate MSDS # 366.00
    Material Safety Data Sheet Page 1 of 2 Iron (II) Ammonium Sulfate MSDS # 366.00 Section 1: Product and Company Identification Iron (II) Ammonium Sulfate Synonyms/General Names: Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate Product Use: For educational use only Manufacturer: Columbus Chemical Industries, Inc., Columbus, WI 53925. 24 Hour Emergency Information Telephone Numbers CHEMTREC (USA): 800-424-9300 CANUTEC (Canada): 613-424-6666 ScholAR Chemistry; 5100 W. Henrietta Rd, Rochester, NY 14586; (866) 260-0501; www.Scholarchemistry.com Section 2: Hazards Identification Pale, blue-green, crystalline solid; no odor. HMIS (0 to 4) Health 1 CAUTION! Slightly toxic by ingestion and body tissue irritant. Fire Hazard 0 Target organs: Liver. Reactivity 0 This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Section 3: Composition / Information on Ingredients Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate, Hexahydrate (7783-85-9), 100% Section 4: First Aid Measures Always seek professional medical attention after first aid measures are provided. Eyes: Immediately flush eyes with excess water for 15 minutes, lifting lower and upper eyelids occasionally. Skin: Immediately flush skin with excess water for 15 minutes while removing contaminated clothing. Ingestion: Call Poison Control immediately. Rinse mouth with cold water. Give victim 1-2 cups of water or milk to drink. Induce vomiting immediately. Inhalation: Remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. Section 5: Fire Fighting Measures Nonflammable solid. When heated to decomposition, emits acrid fumes. 0 Protective equipment and precautions for firefighters: Use foam or dry chemical to extinguish fire. 1 0 Firefighters should wear full fire fighting turn-out gear and respiratory protection (SCBA).
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White
    Animal Industry Report Animal Industry Report AS 662 ASL R3105 2016 Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White Sandun Abeyrathne Iowa State University Hyunyong Lee Iowa State University, [email protected] Dong U. Ahn Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ans_air Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Abeyrathne, Sandun; Lee, Hyunyong; and Ahn, Dong U. (2016) "Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White," Animal Industry Report: AS 662, ASL R3105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-235 Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ans_air/vol662/iss1/66 This Poultry is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Research Reports at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Animal Industry Report by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Iowa State University Animal Industry Report 2016 Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White A.S. Leaflet R3105 to separate ovotransferrin from egg white: a high-level ammonium sulfate, SDS-PAGE and immunoelectrophoresis, Sandun Abeyrathne, Visiting Student; Carboxymethyl (CM)-Toyoperal 650M cation exchange, Hyunyong Lee, Graduate Student; and anion exchange chromatography have been used in the Dong U. Ahn, Professor, past. However, these methods were for laboratory scale and Department of Animal Science were not practical for scale-up processes. Ovomucoid is the most highly glycosylated protein Summary and Implications among the egg white proteins.
    [Show full text]