Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: a Short Review
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
sustainability Review Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: A Short Review Adele Folino 1, Demetrio Antonio Zema 1,* and Paolo S. Calabrò 2 1 Department Agraria, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department Diceam, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Via Graziella, Località Feo di Vito, I-89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: One of the most promising systems to treat swine wastewater is air stripping. This system simultaneously recovers nitrogen salts, to be used as fertiliser, and reduces the organic pollutant load in the effluents of swine breeding farms. Several reviews have discussed the air stripping as a treatment for many types of industrial wastewater or nitrogen-rich digestate (the liquid effluent derived from the anaerobic digestion plants) for the stripping/recovery of nutrients. However, reviews about the use of air stripping as treatment for raw or anaerobically digested swine wastewater are not available in literature. To fill this gap, this study: (i) Summarises the experiences of air stripping for recovery of ammonium salts from both raw and digested swine wastewater; and (ii) compares air stripping efficiency under different operational conditions. Moreover, combined systems including air stripping (such as struvite crystallisation, chemical precipitation, microwave radiation) have been compared. These comparisons have shown that air stripping of raw and digested swine wastewater fits well the concept of bio-refinery, because this system allows the sustainable management of the piggery effluent by extracting value-added compounds, by-products, and/or energy from wastewater. On the other hand, air stripping of raw and digested swine wastewater has not been extensively studied and more investigations should be carried out. Keywords: air stripping; ammonia removal efficiency; ammonium sulphate; digestate; nitrogen recovery; process conditions; struvite 1. Introduction The management of swine wastewater (hereinafter indicated as “SW”) is an important problem for swine breeding farms, as the large production and polluting content lead to several environmental and economic constraints and a generally low sustainability. Due to the high contents of organic and nitrogen compounds, unproper disposal of SW causes pollution of surface and ground waters, unpleasant odour emission in atmosphere, and consumption of oxygen in soil and water bodies. Intensive depuration plants are the most common systems for SW treatment [1]. Other chemical (such as coagulation/flocculation [2–4]), physical [5], or biological (multi-stage or aerobic treatment [1,6]) systems [6–8] have been proposed to ensure an environmentally and economically sound management of SW (Table1). However, these treatments generally show low e fficiency, high costs [9], and process instability, mainly due to the high concentration of ammonia nitrogen that inhibits the microorganisms’ activity. When chemicals are added to the processes (e.g., coagulation/flocculation), the resulting sludge/concentrate cannot be directly spread in agricultural fields, as it may contain undesired Sustainability 2020, 12, 4971; doi:10.3390/su12124971 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2020, 12, 4971 2 of 28 by-products of the chemical process or toxic compounds (e.g., heavy metals) [2,4]. Moreover, secondary pollution may occur [10] and other subsequent treatments may be necessary for the produced sludge/concentrate. Table 1. Advantages and drawbacks of the main systems for the treatment of swine wastewater. Treatment Type Advantages Limitations Water disinfection Microbes and solids can be removed by sedimentation Possible undesired by-products, such as or filtration after flocculation by the addition of trihalomethanes and chlorites in case of coagulants [2] chlorination [2] Chemical accumulation of nutrients Variability of process conditions depending on the Soluble nutrients bound to colloids precipitate as level of disinfection required [2] Coagulation – Flocculation – solids and separated by settling in clarifiers [4] Operating costs [11] Chemical Disinfection (possible) Removal of organic matter and other inorganic species, Sludge production and possible presence such as arsenic and fluoride [4] of heavy metals [11] Flexibility of the operational process. The use of Possible inhibitory effects in the simultaneous chemical precipitation in modified following biological treatment [12] activated sludge systems [11] Low nutrients availability and agronomic utilisation, Low capital cost for reducing phosphorous particularly with aluminium and iron coagulation [13] concentration in the effluent [11] Fertiliser production by bio-solid recovery [2] Salmonella typhimurium Pathogens reduction, such as , Energy costs of filtration membranes [4] Sedimentation E. coli Streptococcus faecalis , [2] Not suitable direct use of the concentrate due to the Physical Reduction of the organic load for the following accumulation of undesired contaminants [4] treatments [2] Pre-treatment needed to prevent membrane fouling [4] Selective separation of the constituents from High cost for membrane replacement due to fouling Membrane filtration waste streams based on the membrane used [4] Possible inhibition due to the presence of Odour control, nitrogen management, toxic compounds (such as resistant pathogens, heavy Biological Activated sludge process and biodegradation of organic waste [2] metals, other organic compounds) system Pathogens inactivation and/or removal [2] Process sensitivity to environmental conditions (pH, temperature, organic load) Often, most of these treatments are not sustainable for the smallest swine-breeding farms working in rural contexts. For these reasons, much attention has been recently paid to extensive systems for SW depuration, such as the aerobic and/or anaerobic lagooning plants (e.g., [14–16]). These extensive systems allow a proper equalisation of the physico-chemical characteristics of wastewater and a reduction of its pollutant load, as for other agro-industrial effluents [17–19]. However, the physico-chemical and biological processes of lagooning plants require a long time (weeks or even months), because the environmental conditions cannot be properly set up. Another viable system for SW treatment is the anaerobic digestion, which allows an easier control of the main operational parameters of the depuration process. The anaerobic digestion systems are used for depurating several agro-industrial waste and wastewater, such as the olive mill wastewater or citrus peel waste and wastewater [20–22]. However, the methane production in the anaerobic digestion plants 1 treating SW is often reduced or even inhibited by the high ammonia content (often over 4.0 g L− ) that hampers the activity of the methanogenic bacteria [23,24]. As a consequence, the methane yield of 1 1 raw SW is about 50 mL gCOD− [23,25] or 100–200 mL gVS− [24,26]. As the SW has a high organic and nutrient loads, the treatment efficiency is not always high and the limits for discharging the treated effluents into water bodies are very strict in some countries (such as Italy), the depurated SW very often is spread on soil for agronomic purposes or sent to further treatments, such as lagooning and constructed wetlands. On the other hand, the high presence of ammonium and phosphorus compounds has suggested the recovery of natural fertilisers from SW using physico-chemical treatments. Examples of these recovered compounds are struvite (either in magnesium, MgNH4PO4, or potassium, KNH4PO4, form) [27,28] and ammonium sulphate [25]. Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for plant growth and crop cultivation, but their production is often expensive. The removal of these compounds from SW not only allows their recovery, but also makes the following treatments easier, leading to a more efficient depuration in lagooning plants and to an increase of the methane yield in anaerobic digestion systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4971 3 of 28 The most common system for ammonia recovery is air stripping. This system consists of blowing air in wastewater, which is also chemically pre-treated by adding alkali—such as NaOH, Ca(OH)2, or CaO—in order to optimise its pH before aeration. The stripped ammonia is recovered by an adsorbing unit as ammonium sulphate, an inorganic salt that can be directly used as a fertiliser. Moreover, when air stripping is used as a pre-treatment for the SW, the risk of ammonia inhibition is lower; for the direct use of the digestate in agriculture, a simple solid–liquid separation without other chemical treatments is only required. An alternative plant scheme is the air stripping of digested wastewater. The effluents of anaerobic digestion, if influent SW is not pre-treated, usually show a high nitrogen content even after the anaerobic digestion. Moreover, the high water content and the possible presence of contaminants (such as heavy metals and organic matter) often makes the digestate not suitable for direct spreading on land [4]. In these cases, air stripping is also applied to reduce the ammonia nitrogen content, in order to allow the valorisation of the digestate as soil conditioner, thus increasing the sustainability of the whole management processes. The literature reports several reviews on AS