www.IndianJournals.com Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale

Downloaded From IP - 61.247.228.217 on dated 27-Jun-2017 (Triticum (Triticum A. Abstract Indian complementary constraint dominant diallel genes HD Hercules (Received: particularly identifying recessive identical are all cultivars. disease Inheritance the 1555 Introduction Indian been Key a extent appear and stage the Foliar infected pathogen is and depends Materials resistant in Eight burnt the over all K. 4530 Alternaria present words: number five blight ranks varieties and Sinha, observed to fashion. possible blight 47 of J. Agricultural most , occurs fields and in look susceptible more leaf conferring and and on All Genet., gene on alleles the blight and HD to and incited February nature. close in is important disease Durum the investigation the and blight, Zadoks particularly five Renu Meghdoot number cause and of with triticina Susceptibility than 4530 an north-eastern as combinations and after methods that durum Desf.). disease durum genes. identification res-genes of 66(3): by to important susceptible a nature Research losses the wheat, 90 genes three of that resistance. complex was Kumari to the (Triticum 2006; Alternaria growth rusts and at scale significant and control per Alternaria wheat Alternaria HD were 200-202 in of The the in genes Alternaria resistant found nature of leaf was of cent in Bipolaris major in in Revised: 4502, Meghdoot [2J, disease durum of plain of stage Institute, resistance and Desf.) to the initial the crossed comprising cultivars blight, resistant strategy of destructiveness the durum HD triticina [4J. which undertaken A. to get of present wheat damage blight resistant genotypes. (2006) triticina DWL crop A. Leeds, resistant 4502, zones resistance Resistance wheat. triticina be 57, stage genetics, sorokiniana. of 28 August K. causal by in Desf.) Regional is and of controlled wheat disease may 5023, growing F Singh B. genes DWL parents in an three Wakooma a 1 two were of durum s sources upto [3J. is leaf major its parents to sorokiniana susceptible 8 x 8 of inheritance, organisms be Therefore, 2006; cultivation India. conferring Raj 5023, occurring dominant dominant breeding [1]. resistant find success crossed present an Heavily regions against Station, growth to It wheat biotic carry 1555, by The and and half x 8 has blight Accepted: For the Raj are out a Pusa 8 advancement 28 the to were so the viable was was Each Regional proper irrigations recommended inter row considered donor adopting 6 of susceptible. sprayed flag parents parents many row (Pusa and and experimental susceptible; High Results between resistance August 848 resistance half to the that create F plants F while was leaf Meghdoot and also susceptible 1 done 1 s Assessment The of other sent 7 s alternaria isolate) 125 suspension diallel disease of Leeds. and F viz., two area at intra as Station, the and of 2 6 surrounded 2006) 0 F (disease were epiphytotic F to were on progeny resistance 2 to workers to the Pusa. 1 s to Three 28 HD times while moderately plot parents be row of set. during dose were discussion 8) was plants developed 25th Wakooma recorded Indian 9 infector F development. resistant, 4502, susceptible x 80 Wellington given as 2 [8J. distance of scale s blight All Half at [5J. susceptible F1s disease of score maintained sown [7]. can to January reflected were the in by the and an involving fertilizer the condition Agricultural DWL 105 to to cultivar, Genotypes of from susceptible one be [6J disease susceptible, interval and 4 3) off in by durum severity of planted F 8 the provide alternaria to (Tamil 1S days scorings grown infector 5023, 10 while subsequently 30 row parental by single 1999. season the 5 Hercules was Inoculum parents, were seed at resistant and as rows A >90 in of reaction of old. crosses the Nadu) moderately in applied 206. 10 Raj simultaneously scoring Research 8 more 10 reaction the The the row. occurred sown per 5 each. were m 5 from days. and summer lines remaining wheat blight, cm 1555, being spores The were infector of material. for cent x Exotic population was and humidity respectively. followed row, culture 1 8 28 of done in Every susceptible along First A. generation entire (ranges to confirmed HD resistant, diseased uniformly to a Institute, frequent done resistant showed crosses per nursery in 3 triticina variety having Durum single Indian 4530, spray 9 when were sixth with with was The plot the ml. for by as by of in www.IndianJournals.com Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale

Downloaded From IP - 61.247.228.217 on dated 27-Jun-2017 Table August, 6. 2. 8. 5. 9. 3. 7. 4. Susceptible 3. SI. 14. 13. 10. 2. 3 15. 12. 11. 4. 1. 1. 2. Resistant 1. No. 1. Wakooma Wakooma Wakooma Leeds Wakooma Wakooma Hercules Resistant Leeds Leeds Leeds Leeds Cross Hercules Hercules Hercules Hercules HO OWL Wakooma HO Raj Leeds Leeds 2006] x Segregation Resistant 4502 4530 x 1555 5023 Susceptible x x x x x x x HO Meghdoot OWL HO Raj Wakooma Hercules x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x HO HO Raj Meghdoot Meghdoot Meghdoot OWL Meghdoot 4530 4502 Susceptible HO HO Meghdoot 1555 HercIJles Raj OWL Meghdoot 5023 4530 4502 1555 of 4530 4502 1555 5023 5023 field reaction F3 F2 F3 F1 Generation F2 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F2 F3 F3 F2 F2 F2 F3 F2 F3 F3 F3 F2 F3 F2 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F2 F2 F3 F2 F3 F3 F2 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F2 F2 F2 F2 F3 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F3 F2 F2 F1 F1 Inheritance ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of ~Of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of to F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 Alternaria sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) res.) res.) res.) res.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) sus.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) res.) sus.) res.) res.) res.) res.) of leaf blight observed No. 318 413 414 plants 343 354 307 397 4 314 349 347 385 386 338 324 359 369 367 376 373 361 381 341 85 88 81 55 67 39 33 37 70 71 626 27 26 25 27 24 25 27 24 26 27 26 27 26 26 26 26 29 26 28 47 56 53 54 55 54 53 57 66 34 34 30 33 73 867 78 31 31 31 31 828 28 29 25 28 27 28 26 26 27 27 27 29 26 27 26 28 21 56 35 38 32 36 31 31 blight of resistance in susceptible F 1 lnsplants plants 282 235 No. 332 315 313 285 250 211 291 269 297 245 276 338 9 146 197 197 F , 58 56 55 67 73 71 27 28 27 26 42 45 42 45 45 41 41 37 61 25 42 44 44 Segregation 2 of and in durum F resistant 3 No. 141 101 150 generations 87 83 88 85 89 33 39 33 98 90 79 29 29 28 21 83 35 35 38 32 36 36 34 34 30 33 90 37 38 31 31 31 31 31 31 91 13 14 14 14 10 12 12 10 29 21 14 15 15 10 12 12 10 13 11 11 of wheat Exgected from us: 57: 57: 57: 57: 9:7 9:7 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 9:7 3: 3: 3: 3: Res 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 7 resistant ratio x 0.725 0.394 0.193 0.568 0.184 0.065 0.676 0.994 0.738 0.355 0.139 0.777 0.385 0.398 0.709 0.266 0.516 0.24 0.08 X susceptible 2 'P'range 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.8 0.3-0.5 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.5-0.7 0.5-0.7 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.8 0.3-0.5 0.3-0.5 0.7-0.8 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.3-0.5 crosses 201 www.IndianJournals.com Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale

Downloaded From IP - 61.247.228.217 on dated 27-Jun-2017 observations four blight complementary 9]. a susceptibility 202 to the x parents, 3097/RL 5023, and segregation sources 1555 while because homozygous parent, is ratio raised resistance resistance. knowledge appearance of susceptibility 1 In F not resistance R. 2 an two resistant few The A. conclusion, susceptible F segregate susceptible This 2 Hercules of All The In In American Wakooma and was triticina Raj from dominant susceptible Meghdoot segregation resistant F showing, F is 9S the 3 2 their 3304//Stewart) four to to indicates HO 1555 inherited population, of derived It parents population F of ratio indicate dominant : in three to 2 Alternaria A. in number is susceptible for 7R it 4530 a genes source carry resistant intercrosses parents F Alternaria (Lakota complementary Meghdoot. triticina and plants can thereby (Table 2 few population likely of parent, resistance in resistant behaviour. from generation. as were that that 57S: gave HO raised be resistant identical for F and and of crosses blight 2 a viz., that *2/Pelissier) 1). were in plants, the the a resistance Meghdoot categorically dominant 4530 susceptibility. a with parents are triticina. heterozygous. resistant 7R nature a the This common from parents HO presence recessive susceptibility the failed in segregating in is observed; in Canadian plants all resistant between Leeds genes when genes none exhibited Leeds, 4502, F F consisted 2 resistance F of viz., 2 the . This 2 gave trait to susceptible to (Table and Leeds, But genes unknown of with in intercrossed for of Alternaria OWL stated HO (BR three for Wakooma gene segregate [9, indicated genotypes them a two resistant However, F Hercules the they while, susceptibility to ratio 3 sources segregating 4502, susceptible 1801Wells) 1). resistance 10]. controlling Wakooma 5023, confirmed Alternaria dominant presence of of resistant that governs showed A. gave parent. of plants, These those these blight OWL both K. and that and (RL 3S: Raj the the did for [8, of a Sinha foliar 3. 2. Hercules References 7. 5. 8. 6. 4. 1. 9. 10. et al., Zadoks Chaurasia Shoran, Singh, Singh, decimal 14: India Research, NVPR Directorate blight Saari 377-380. analysis dominance of Joshi the 44: Alternaria Alternaria Phytopath., resistance born resistance blight Sinha Sharma Seed sorokiniana Indian RAU Raut Narula Kulshreshtha Leaf 105-107. wheat 415-421. 792-796. foliar will infection Coordinated J. Tip J. of .E. E. infection A. Phytopath., A. B.S. resistant S.S. Res., Ganga code P. be wheat. G., in J. S. (T. S. Necrosis: K., intensity K. P.O. to resistance to Exotic and of N. trlticina S., C., C., valuable 36: Tyagi, (Sacc.) aestivum Guldhe of Nagarajan, Chand Bisht, and spot for 16: an Alternaria of and Chand Wheat in Randhawa Chang V. Prescott 372-374. Euphytica, Box Alternaria Rao, the isolate 25-30. and Wheat relation Kumari varieties of blotch 36: P. G.P. A Shoemaker, Srivastava D. growth 158, R., and S. wheat L.). and Indian to phenotypic 274-277. Research. R. P.42.10. in T. Mohan, trit/dna M. Kumar of Singh, J. B.S. other disease Kamal J. and to wheat. T. triticina Renu. 25: Cochliobolus Rao Alternaria and H. M. diseases. stages Plant Germplasm the of and S. Joshi 1975. Malik, 769-775. Pras. breeders R. S. Wangikar O. M. wheat. V. in 132 susceptibility and Varietal Dis. in Directorate 2006. marker 1999. in Konzak Indian Tiwari, and different of P. V. Mahajan, wheat. A wheat 001. & A. cereals. Sharma trit/cina R.P. Prot., Plant [Vol. scale Prab. 1971. 1976. Singh K. Combining Results of Trials, sativus. associated Raj J. in P. 2000. and Durum C. Crop Singh, growth 107: Dis. for and 66, developing causing Genet., Genetics Genetics Weed 1983. of Kumar R. Gyanendra H. F. of appraising its (Eds.) Rep., of 176-181. wheat Science, Bipolaris P. L. Relative 1974. control. No. Wheat, Wheat Indian stages R.V.P. the ability 2004. 1983. Res., Seed with and Jag leaf 31: 59: All to of of 3 A