Assessing India's Soft Power

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing India's Soft Power This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. India‑Us relations : assessing India’s soft power Das, Ajaya Kumar 2015 Das, A. K. (2015). India‑Us relations : assessing India’s soft power. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/65518 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/65518 Downloaded on 04 Oct 2021 20:07:34 SGT INDIA-US RELATIONS: ASSESSING INDIA’S SOFT POWER AJAYA KUMAR DAS S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies A thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Acknowledgements This thesis marks the culmination of eight years of my life in the pursuit of the highest knowledge. I owe much to my supervisor, Professor Rajesh Basrur, for his guidance and patience and I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to him. This undertaking would, frankly, have been impossible without him. I would also like to thank Professor C. Raja Mohan, who initially supervised me. For over a decade, he has been an inspiration and influence in my educational pursuits. The candidate would like to thank the three anonymous examiners for suggestions on revisions. As always, my dearest friend Mahesh is a source of joy and support. I am indebted to my parents for giving me all their love, support and understanding. I am also indebted to my beautiful wife, Pranati, who, over these years, has always been a constant source of moral support, love and caring. I also owe a great deal to Vinod and Kyaw who have been good friends since I came to know them. Last, but not least, I wish to thank all my colleagues and friends at RSIS, with whom I have garnered great experience and memories of working together. i Table of Contents Contents Pages Acknowledgements i Table of Contents ii Summary iii-iv Chapter 1 1-23 Introduction Chapter 2 24-60 The Concept of Soft Power Chapter 3 61-93 Foundations of India‘s Soft Power Chapter 4 94-165 Soft Power Limitations: India and the United States, 1947-1964 Chapter 5 166-250 Soft Power Success: India and the United States, 1998-2013 Chapter 6 251-262 Conclusion Bibliography 263-297 ii Summary How do we think about ―soft power‖ theoretically and how do we study it empirically? What is the relationship between economic and military hard power and soft power traditionally understood as based on culture, political values and foreign policy? These questions guide this study of India‘s soft power and how it influenced India‘s relations with the United States. The puzzling question it aims to answer is why India has been able to exercise its soft power in its relations with the US more effectively in the post- 1998 period as compared to the Nehru era (1947-1964). From the power analysis standpoint, India‘s ability to affect the US in order to accomplish its preferences through attraction is its exercise of soft power. What explains the greater effectiveness of India‘s soft power in terms of its preferred outcomes in the post-1998 period when compared to that of the Nehru period? The explanation for this puzzle addresses all the questions raised above, which, although considered by some scholars including Joseph S. Nye at the conceptual level, has not been studied empirically. Even at the conceptual level, disagreements exist, especially with respect to the relationship between soft and hard power. Soft power, as this thesis demonstrates, is enabled by hard power. It can also be undermined by hard power. Its greater effectiveness, therefore, depends on a high level of economic and military hard power resources. No one has thus far systematically shown the dependence of soft power on hard power. The relationship between soft and hard power is sometimes conceptualised in the form of ―smart power‖ and ―cosmopolitan power‖ for optimisation of a state‘s influence. This study, however, does not delve into this issue. Instead, it focuses on the greater efficacy of soft power, which needs the support of hard power resources. The present study sheds light on India‘s relationship with the US by using soft power as a central explanatory variable. As far as the level of hard power required to make soft power more effective is concerned, there was a tipping point in the case of India. It was the 1998 nuclear tests iii after which the US began to give positive attention to India and to think of it as a rising strategic player. There was a gap, of course, as the US imposed sanctions after the tests, but the ―Singh-Talbott talks‖ brought about the first sign of change. The real transformation happened with the 2005 US–India Civil Nuclear Agreement. With no other ―proliferator‖ has such understanding on the part of the US happened. In India‘s case, the acceptance of it as a responsible and a democratic power reflects its soft power attraction: the nuclear breakout was a hard power (nuclear) shift accompanied by soft power attraction. So long as India was a covert nuclear power, the tipping point had not been reached and its attraction by itself was not enough to remove non- proliferation pressure. After the tests, everything changed: the US de-hyphenated India from Pakistan, ended India‘s nuclear isolation, and began defence cooperation with it in earnest. This study uses the ―process tracing‖ method to show empirically the causal processes that link India‘s relative effectiveness of soft power with low or high levels of hard power. The effectiveness of soft power is measured in terms of India‘s success in achieving preferred policy outcomes through the mechanism of attraction and persuasion. Despite increasing interest in India‘s soft power, both among scholars and diplomats, there is hardly any rigorous and systematic case study of successful projection of India‘s soft power. This study attempts to fill that gap and seeks to contribute empirically to the literature on relational soft power, while also offering policymakers guidance as to how soft power can be usefully approached and effectively utilised. iv CHAPTER 1 Introduction Is ―soft power‖ really power? What is its basis? When does it become a more effective form of state power? What is its relationship with ―hard power‖ such as economic and military power?1 These questions are central to understanding the concept of ―soft power‖, which in recent years has gained wide currency in both international relations scholarship and policy discourse. These very questions guide this study of the role of soft power in India‘s relations with the United States.2 The puzzling question this study seeks to answer is why India‘s soft power vis-à-vis the US has been more effective during the post-1998 period when compared with the Nehru era (1947–1964). From the power analysis standpoint, India‘s ability to affect the US in order to accomplish its preferences through attraction is its exercise of soft power.3 In the post-1998 period, India‘s soft power enabled it to influence the US in terms of its (a) dehyphenation from Pakistan; (b) civil nuclear cooperation; and (c) enhanced defence cooperation. These preferred outcomes fundamentally transformed the nature of its bilateral relations and have taken it to an unprecedented level. During the Nehru period, India received limited military cooperation. US economic assistance to India grew only after the mid-1950s. The US was keen to extend economic and military assistance to India so as to prevent it from collapsing under the weight of economic failure or military defeat and coming under Communism. Therefore, the overall relations between India and the US swung between cooperation and confrontation. What explains the greater effectiveness of India‘s soft power in terms of its preferred outcomes in the post-1998 period when compared to that of the Nehru 1The next chapter presents a detailed description of the concepts of soft power and hard power. 2Any research project should aim at (a) dealing ―with a real-world topic‖ and (b) being ―designed to contribute, directly or indirectly, to a specific scholarly literature‖. See Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994), 18. 3This relational definition of power is fleshed out in the next chapter. 1 period? The explanation for this puzzle addresses all the questions raised above, which, although considered by some scholars including Joseph S. Nye at the conceptual level, has not been studied empirically. Even at the conceptual level, disagreements exist, especially with respect to the relationship between soft and hard power. Soft power, as this thesis will demonstrate, is enabled by levels of hard power. It can also be undermined by hard power. Its greater effectiveness, therefore, depends on economic and military hard power resources. No one has thus far systematically shown the dependence of soft power on hard power. The relationship between soft and hard power is, as we shall see in Chapter 2, sometimes conceptualised in the form of ―smart power‖ and ―cosmopolitan power‖ for optimisation of a state‘s influence. This study, however, does not delve into this issue. Instead, it focuses on the greater efficacy of soft power, which needs the support of hard power resources. The present study sheds light on India‘s relationship with the US by using soft power as a central explanatory variable. The structural factors have an enabling or disabling effect on the role of India‘s soft power; hence, their role cannot be dismissed (see Chapter 2).
Recommended publications
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • A US-Indonesia Partnership for 2020: Recommendations for Forging
    A U.S.–Indonesia Partnership for 2020 Recommendations for Forging a 21st Century Relationship AUTHORS A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Murray Hiebert Chair for Southeast Asia Studies Ted Osius SEPTEMBER 2013 Gregory B. Poling A U.S.- Indonesia Partnership for 2020 Recommendations for Forging a 21st Century Relationship AUTHORS Murray Hiebert Ted Osius Gregory B. Poling A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies September 2013 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS— 50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars are developing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofi t orga ni zation headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affi liated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to fi nding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. Former deputy secretary of defense John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Health International Affairs Science
    International Affairs Gabrielle Appleby Vicki J. Huddleston Associate Professor, University of New South Ambassador (ret.) to Mali & to Madagascar, Wales Faculty of Law, Sydney, Australia US Department of State, Santa Fe, NM Laurence Brahm Peter Rupert Lighte Founder, Himalayan Consensus Institute, Sinologist, Princeton, New Jersey China and Nepal Shadia Marhaban Neil Diamant Acehnese Journalist, Activist, & Peace Professor of Asian Law & Society, Dickinson Mediator, Aech, Indonesia College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Ted Osius 20172017 Mark Fallon Ambassador to the Socialist Republic of International Security Consultant, Georgia Vietnam, U.S. Department of State, Vietnam Deliana Garcia Steven Vertovec Director of Migrant Clinicians Network, Austin, TX Director, Max Planck Institute for the Study Maurizio Geri of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Goettingen, Germany Strategic Analyst, NATO, Allied Command Transformation, Norfolk, Virginia Sofia Villarreal-Castaneda SPEAKERS & Larry Greenwood Founder & Editor of #EmergingUS and Founder of Define America, Los Angeles President, Japan Society of Northern California, Walnut Creek, California Frank Strasburger Former Episcopalian Chaplain, Princeton University, Health & Facilitator, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maryland Chris Borland Science PERFORMERS Former San Francisco 49ers Linebacker, Ellen Jorgensen Madison, Wisconson Co-Founder and Executive Director, Joel Gallant Genspace, Brooklyn, New York Medical Director of Specialty Services, Southwest CARE Center, Santa Fe Kathryn Medler Associate
    [Show full text]
  • Department of State Key Officers List
    United States Department of State Telephone Directory This customized report includes the following section(s): Key Officers List (UNCLASSIFIED) 1/17/2017 Provided by Global Information Services, A/GIS Cover UNCLASSIFIED Key Officers of Foreign Service Posts Afghanistan RSO Jan Hiemstra AID Catherine Johnson CLO Kimberly Augsburger KABUL (E) Great Massoud Road, (VoIP, US-based) 301-490-1042, Fax No working Fax, INMARSAT Tel 011-873-761-837-725, ECON Jeffrey Bowan Workweek: Saturday - Thursday 0800-1630, Website: EEO Erica Hall kabul.usembassy.gov FMO David Hilburg IMO Meredith Hiemstra Officer Name IPO Terrence Andrews DCM OMS vacant ISO Darrin Erwin AMB OMS Alma Pratt ISSO Darrin Erwin Co-CLO Hope Williams DCM/CHG Dennis W. Hearne FM Paul Schaefer Algeria HRO Dawn Scott INL John McNamara ALGIERS (E) 5, Chemin Cheikh Bachir Ibrahimi, +213 (770) 08- MGT Robert Needham 2000, Fax +213 (21) 60-7335, Workweek: Sun - Thurs 08:00-17:00, MLO/ODC COL John Beattie Website: http://algiers.usembassy.gov POL/MIL John C. Taylor Officer Name SDO/DATT COL Christian Griggs DCM OMS Sharon Rogers, TDY TREAS Tazeem Pasha AMB OMS Carolyn Murphy US REP OMS Jennifer Clemente Co-CLO Julie Baldwin AMB P. Michael McKinley FCS Nathan Seifert CG Jeffrey Lodinsky FM James Alden DCM vacant HRO Dana Al-Ebrahim PAO Terry Davidson ICITAP Darrel Hart GSO William McClure MGT Kim D'Auria-Vazira RSO Carlos Matus MLO/ODC MAJ Steve Alverson AFSA Pending OPDAT Robert Huie AID Herbie Smith POL/ECON Junaid Jay Munir CLO Anita Kainth POL/MIL Eric Plues DEA Craig M.
    [Show full text]
  • Democrats Draw Sharp Contrast with GOP Over LGBT Issues Memorial
    OCTOBER 16 2015 VOLUME 46 ISSUE 42 • AMERICA’S GAY NEWS SOURCE • WASHINGTONBLADE.COM Democrats draw sharp contrast with GOP over LGBT issues By CHRIS JOHNSON [email protected] LGBT issues did not fi gure prominently during the fi rst Democratic presidential debate on Tuesday, but some candidates — including Hillary Clinton in her widely praised performance — sought to weave support for the LGBT community into their responses, drawing a key contrast between them and their Republican counterparts. Only once did LGBT rights get framed as part of a question: When moderator and CNN reporter Anderson Cooper noted Clinton’s changes in positions, including same-sex marriage, and asked whether she’ll say anything to get elected. “Well, actually, I have been very consistent,” Clinton replied. “Over the HILLARY CLINTON was one of three Democratic presidential hopefuls who cited LGBT rights on Tuesday. PHOTO BY 1PHOTO; COURTESY OF BIGSTOCK CONTINUES ON PAGE 14 Memorial plans stalled four year in a four-year eff ort to establish a memorial site for Kameny in Washington. years after activist’s death Kameny died of natural causes at his D.C. home on Oct. 11, 2011. He was 86. His passing came a short time after the By LOU CHIBBARO JR. Library of Congress accepted the donation of his voluminous [email protected] collection of papers detailing his work on behalf of LGBT equality over a period of more than 50 years. The president of D.C.’s Congressional Cemetery says he’s According to Williams, the Veterans Aff airs Department hopeful that a memorial headstone for the late gay rights pioneer informed him it could not approve an application that he Frank Kameny issued by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies: 25 Years Into Normalization
    Transcript: The U.S. – Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies: 25 Years into Normalization The Stimson Center Zoom Webinar July 15, 2020 from 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM EST Courtney Weatherby: Thank you all for joining us for today’s event on the US – Vietnam Relationship and War Legacies. Before we begin, I just want to make a brief logistical note to inform all of you that we have simultaneous translation available between English and Vietnamese for today’s discussion. If you need to hear translation of comments, please go to the bottom of your screen to access the translation, which is labeled as the “German” channel for everyone. So if you are listening in English but would like to hear Vietnamese, please go into the German channel; if you are listening to the main audio and there are remarks provided in Vietnamese and you need to hear the English translation, please go into the German channel. It is an option at the bottom of your Zoom screen; it’s an easy transition, and I will also include logistical notes on how to do this in the chat box for everyone’s reference. And with that announcement, I am going to go ahead and turn everything over to our CEO, Brian Finlay. Brian Finlay: Courtney, thank you so much for helping to put all this together. We’re very grateful to you, my colleague, Courtney Weatherby. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to what is, for us, going to be a very special event at Stimson. Obviously, we wish we could be welcoming you all in person to the Stimson Center, but we’re really grateful for this opportunity to reach so many of you across the country and really around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand?
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 2021 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand? September 2021 Volume 98, No. 7 Focus on 9/11, Twenty Years Later 22 Getting Off the X In a compelling personal account of the 9/11 attacks, one FSO offers tactics for surviving when catastrophe strikes. By Nancy Ostrowski 26 The Global War on Terror and Diplomatic Practice The war on terror fundamentally changed U.S. diplomacy, leaving a trail 39 of collateral damage to America’s readiness for future challenges. Intervention: FS Know-How By Larry Butler Unlearned Lessons, or the Gripes of a Professional 46 31 The State Department’s failure to Whistleblower effectively staff and run interventions Protections: America and 9/11: has a long history. Four critical A Nonpartisan The Real-World Impact of lessons can be drawn from the post-9/11 experience. Necessity Terrorism and Extremism As old as the United States itself, In retrospect, 9/11 did not foreshadow By Ronald E. Neumann whistleblowing has protections the major changes that now drive worth knowing about. U.S. foreign policy and national security strategy. By Alain Norman and 43 Raeka Safai By Anthony H . Cordesman From the FSJ Archive 9/11, War on Terror, Iraq 35 and Afghanistan FS Heritage The Proper Measure of the Place: 48 Reflections on the Diplomats Make Afghan Mission a Difference: Drawing from two tours, a decade The U.S. and Mongolia, apart, a veteran diplomat explores the competing visions for Afghanistan. 1986-1990 In the 1992 FSJ, Ambassador By Keith W.
    [Show full text]
  • Quad Plus: Special Issue of the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs
    The Journal of JIPA Indo-Pacific Affairs Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen Charles Q. Brown, Jr., USAF Chief of Space Operations, US Space Force Gen John W. Raymond, USSF Commander, Air Education and Training Command Lt Gen Marshall B. Webb, USAF Commander and President, Air University Lt Gen James B. Hecker, USAF Director, Air University Academic Services Dr. Mehmed Ali Director, Air University Press Maj Richard T. Harrison, USAF Chief of Professional Journals Maj Richard T. Harrison, USAF Editorial Staff Dr. Ernest Gunasekara-Rockwell, Editor Luyang Yuan, Editorial Assistant Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator Megan N. Hoehn, Print Specialist Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs ( JIPA) 600 Chennault Circle Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6010 e-mail: [email protected] Visit Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs online at https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/. ISSN 2576-5361 (Print) ISSN 2576-537X (Online) Published by the Air University Press, The Journal of Indo–Pacific Affairs ( JIPA) is a professional journal of the Department of the Air Force and a forum for worldwide dialogue regarding the Indo–Pacific region, spanning from the west coasts of the Americas to the eastern shores of Africa and covering much of Asia and all of Oceania. The journal fosters intellectual and professional development for members of the Air and Space Forces and the world’s other English-speaking militaries and informs decision makers and academicians around the globe. Articles submitted to the journal must be unclassified, nonsensitive, and releasable to the public. Features represent fully researched, thoroughly documented, and peer-reviewed scholarly articles 5,000 to 6,000 words in length.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, November 2016
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 2016 FULBRIGHT AND THE FOREIGN SERVICE TURKEYS AT THE BORDER FOREIGN SERVICE November 2016 Volume 93, No. 9 20 Cover Story 20 Fulbright Program at 70: The Foreign Service Connection Members of the Foreign Service, some of them Fulbright alumni, play a crucial role in the continuing success of this singular U.S. exchange program. By Jerome Sherman and James Lawrence Focus on Foreign Service Authors 28 In Their Own Write We are pleased to present this year’s roundup of books by Foreign Service members and their families. By Susan B. Maitra 40 Of Related Interest Here is a short list of other 2016 28 titles of interest to diplomats. THE FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2016 5 FOREIGN SERVICE Departments 10 Letters Perspectives 13 Talking Points 7 78 63 In Memory President’s Views Local Lens 70 Books Championing American Diplomacy Chennai, India By Barbara Stephenson By Ed Malcik 9 Letter from the Editor Sharing Your Stories By Shawn Dorman 17 15 Speaking Out Getting Beyond Bureaucratese— Why Writing Like Robots Damages Marketplace U.S. Interests By Paul Poletes 71 Classifieds 77 74 Real Estate Reflections Turkeys Parade at the Border 76 Index to Advertisers By Victoria Hess 78 AFSA NEWS THE OFFICIAL RECORD OF THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION 54 Notes from LM: What Not to Say at the Office Holiday Party 55 Agreement Reached on 2013 MSI Remedies 56 Call for AFSA Award Nominations 56 Sinclaire Language Award Nominations 57 FAM Updates: Resources for New Parents 57 Forum Discusses the Carter Administration’s PD Policy 58 Apply Now for AFSA College Scholarships 59 Combined Federal Campaign: A Great Way to 51 Support AFSA 60 Governing Board Meeting Minutes 51 Washington Nationals Honor the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Indonesia Fall 2018
    Republic of Indonesia Fall 2018 US Naval War College Joint Maritime Operations students present their thoughts and approaches to tackle a pressing national security problem. Edited by CDR Nicholas A. Kristof, USN The views expressed in these papers reflect personal opinions of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Naval War College, the United States Navy, the US State Department, USAID, any federal agency, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. Table of Contents True Believers: Religious Intolerance and Instability ................................................................... 1 William A. Adler, LTC, US Army Reassessing the US Freedom of Navigation Program in a Complex Competitive Environment . 13 Douglas Briller, US Department of State Countering Transnational Terrorism by Increasing Indonesian Special Operation Forces’ Capacity ............................................................................................................................ 25 Tiffany Chapman, LTC, US Army The Republic of Indonesia’s Maritime Strategy: Lofty Aspirations Without the Means to Achieve Them ................................................................................................................... 36 Joseph Girard, Capt., US Navy Breaking the Cycle of Escalation: A US Approach to Assisting with Counter-Terrorism and Creating an Avenue for Further Engagement ................................................................... 49 Ryan L. Hill, Lt Col, US Air Force Trade and Economic
    [Show full text]
  • THE ART of CRITIQUE: the BACKBONE of an ARTS EDUCATION LEADERSHIP TEAM from LAURA FREID LAURA FREID President PRESIDENT
    WINTER + SPRING 2018 THE ART OF CRITIQUE: THE BACKBONE OF AN ARTS EDUCATION LEADERSHIP TEAM FROM LAURA FREID LAURA FREID President PRESIDENT ELIZABETH ELICKER IAN ANDERSON JULIE D'ANDREA Dear Students, Alumni, Family, and Friends, Executive Vice President Vice President of Academic Aff airs Vice President of Development Being a newcomer to the vibrant community here at Maine and Dean of the College College of Art, I have had the privilege of seeing the College with fresh eyes and experiencing the New Student Orientation with the Class of 2021. EDITORIAL BOARD Do you remember your fi rst days at college? Try to picture yourself at this year’s Orientation. You would be deciding whether to take A Field Guide to the New World, which ANNIE WADLEIGH RAFFI DER SIMONIAN CLAUDE CASWELL explores ideas and solutions for the changing environment, Assistant Director of Development Director of Marketing Associate Professor, or to get hands-on experience with Slow Fashion: Fibers, and Communications Academic Studies Fashion, and the Farm to gain insights into the textile and fashion industry. Perhaps you would choose Species of DESIGN PHOTOGRAPHY Spaces and learn about the characteristics of the spaces we inhabit and how our senses aff ect our experiences BRITTANY MARTIN KYLE DUBAY ’18 with them. Maybe you would be selected for the Honors Graphic Designer section, which looks at Portland’s urban landscape using Walter Benjamin’s Arcades Project as a guide. In each case, you would be learning about Portland and the ways that artists bring concepts and experiences to life. Being BOARD OF TRUSTEES a student at MECA today is an exhilarating and empowering experience, one that we will attempt to share with you through Brian Wilk ’95, Chair Deborah H.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing India-ASEAN Connectivity
    Enhancing India-ASEAN Connectivity PRINCIPAL AUTHOR FOREWORD A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Ted Osius Ernest Z. Bower Chair for Southeast Asia Studies Karl F. Inderfurth and the Wadhwani Chair for CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR U.S.-India Policy Studies Hemant K. Singh C. Raja Mohan June 2013 Enhancing India- ASEAN Connectivity PRINCIPAL AUTHOR Ted Osius CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR C. Raja Mohan FOREWORD Ernest Z. Bower Karl F. Inderfurth Hemant K. Singh A Report of the CSIS Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies and the Wadhwani Chair for U.S.- India Policy Studies June 2013 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS— 50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars are developing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofi t orga ni zation headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affi liated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to fi nding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration.
    [Show full text]