DOCSLIB.ORG

Auckland Council District Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This section updated December 2014 designations appendix DESIGNATING AUTHORITY: AIRWAYS CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED LOCATION REF LOCAL PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED PURPOSE Rua o te Whenua AC1 F4 Lot 1 DP 137549 being pt Allot 430 Aerodrome purposes Waipareira Parish, Pt Lot 1 DP 37071 being (communications facility) Pt Allot 193 & 430 Waipareira Parish Conditions Relating to Airways Corporation of New Zealand Limited Designations 1. To ensure that section 176A 3(f) of the Act has been adequately addressed, an outline plan shall include, as appropriate: (a) a statement on the relevant Plan objectives, policies and rules; (b)a statement on any adverse effects the works will have on the environment and the mitigation measures to be carried out; (c) a visual impact and mitigation assessment where the proposed work is a new tower structure at Rua o tea Whenua Designation TP 3 (as provided for in Condition 5(a)) Explanation While it is accepted that the project or works will be (or should be) in accordance with the designated purpose, the Council wishes to be reasonably assured that the specific works to be carried out will not unnecessarily compromise the objectives, policies and rules of the Plan or adversely affect the environment. The Council’s principal opportunity to influence the works to assist the requiring authority to meet its environmental responsibilities is through the outline plan, and the assessment of compliance and effects will assist it in determining whether to request changes. 2. Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures shall be employed for any earthworks on the designated site. Explanation The Plan outlines erosion and sediment control measures for earthworks which are above a certain threshold, with that threshold varying according to the particular environment. Compliance with these measures would generally satisfy condition 2. Note that major earthworks may require a consent from the Regional Council. 3. All development on the site shall be within the “defined development area” as defined on plan number AL20963 sheets 1 and 2. 4. The maximum height of any development on the site shall be not more than 25 metres above ground level. 5. Development which is additional to that on the site as at 1 February 2000 (which included a tower structure, three “slim-line” masts, the Airways Corporation equipment building and the Transpower repeater building) shall be limited to: (a) the replacement of the existing tower structure with another facility, provided that when the new facility is completed and commissioned, the existing tower is decommissioned and demolished: (b)antennae attached to the existing tower or new tower (provided that these do not exceed the overall height limit); (c) up to four additional “slim-line” masts of similar design to the three existing masts; (d)accessory buildings with a maximum height of 4.5 metres; and (e) the extension of the site access road 6. Native vegetation alteration (including removal) shall be restricted to: (a) removal of vegetation from within the “defined development area”; and (b)removal or pruning of any vegetation which compromises the operation of the facility. Explanation (Conditions 3-6) It is noted that the site is also the subject of another designation (TP 3) and the above conditions apply to any development on the site. The site subject to this designation is visually prominent and substantially bush-clad. It contains communications facilities, including a dome radar tower, which have an important function for the region and beyond. The conditions are intended to provide for future development but to ensure such development is within a confined area of the site, and that natural and landscape values of the balance of the site are not compromised. The conditions are designed to allow the replacement of the existing dome radar tower, allowing the existing facility to continue to operate until the new facility is commissioned. The conditions are also intended to provide for the operation and limited expansion of other communications facilities on the site, specifically those for Airways Corporation and Transpower New Zealand Limited. designations appendix 2 DESIGNATING AUTHORITY: AUCKLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL LOCATION REF LOCAL PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED PURPOSE Waitakere Ranges RP D2, D4, FO, F2, F4, F6, Waitakere Ranges Regional Regional Parkland G6, G7, G8, G9, Parkland as describe in HO, H2, H4, H6, H8, H10, 18, NOR-2010-672 and NOR-2011-1141 J2, J4. J6 Conditions Relating to Auckland Regional Park Designations 1. The following information shall be provided with any outline plan submitted in accordance with section 176A of the Act: (a) An assessment of effects that the work or project will have on the environment, including: • effects on vegetation and significant trees (as identified in the District Plan), • sensitive ridgelines (as identified in the District Plan), • effects on residential properties within 10 metres from the works; (b)Where appropriate, an assessment of natural, cultural and/or built heritage features and a statement on how effects on these features will be avoided, remedied or mitigated; (c) A written statement of how the works will give effect to the Auckland Regional Council Threatened Plant Management Strategy - Threatened Plant Guideline; 2. All vegetation alteration for track maintenance will be done in accordance with NZS HB 8630:2004. 3. The New Zealand Historic Places Trust shall be consulted about additions or alterations to a heritage item scheduled in the Plan, where those additions or alterations affect the values described in the schedule to the Plan. Consultation is not required for maintenance and repair of heritage items. 4. The designation shall not apply to the relocation, demolition or partial demolition of heritage items scheduled in the Plan. 5. The following works will be exempt from an outline plan pursuant to section 176A (2) of the Act: Development and maintenance of park infrastructure Nature of works Tracks Maintenance of existing tracks Maintenance including minor upgrades of existing tracks, including maintaining i) water tables and track drainage, ii) track surface, iii) track structures such as signs, safety barriers, bridges, steps, board walks and rafts, iv) modification of vegetation up to 1 metre from the centre of the track, depending on the track classification. Buildings, structures and utility services, including Maintenance and minor repairs to buildings, Maintenance and minor repairs to existing drainage systems structures and utility services, including heritage buildings, structures and utility services, including sites. the modification of vegetation up to 1 metre from the building, structure or utility service. Minor structures and utility services, not including The construction of minor recreational structures heritage sites. such as notice boards, signs, picnic tables, shade shelters and entry gates. Car parking and roads Maintenance of car parks and roads. Maintenance of car parking areas and access roads, including the modification of vegetation up to 1 metre from the edge of the car park or road or within the car park for safety reasons. Farming Construction and maintenance of farming structures Works associated with operating and maintaining (not including heritage sites or works within the drip existing farms, including fencing and livestock line or root zone of scheduled trees). management structures, such as stockyards. This does not include structures with impervious surfaces. designations appendix 3 Development and maintenance of park infrastructure Nature of works Vegetation Management of vegetation for specified reasons. Vegetation management involved in; i) control of pest plants, ii) re-vegetation programmes, iii) the maintenance of view shafts identified in the Regional Parks Management Plan, iv) regulations under the Electricity Act 1992. NB: Please refer to Advice Note 3 below in relation to the exemptions applying to re-vegetation programmes (ii above) and regulations under the Electricity Act 1992 (iv above). Advice Notes: 1. Work affecting pre-1900 archaeological sites is subject to a consenting process under the Historic Places Act 1993. If any activity, such as earthworks, fencing or landscaping, may modify, damage or destroy any archaeological site(s), an authority (consent) from the New Zealand Historic Places Trust must be obtained for the work to proceed lawfully. The Historic Places Act 1993 contains penalties for unauthorised site damage. Evidence of archaeological sites may include burnt and fire cracked stones, charcoal, rubbish heaps including shell, bone and/or glass and crockery, ditches, banks, pits, old building foundations, artefacts of Maori and European origin or human burials. 2. The Council intends to protect heritage items scheduled in the Plan. Therefore this designation does not provide for the relocation, demolition or partial demolition of heritage items scheduled in the Plan. The underlying Plan rules will apply to relocation, demolition or partial demolition of heritage items. 3. While Condition 5 above provides an exemption from the requirement to submit an outline plan under section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 in relation re-vegetation programmes, such programmes are undertaken in accordance with internal protocols established by the Auckland Regional Council and also, where applicable, in accordance with the Auckland Regional Council Threatened Plant Guideline. Furthermore, for the avoidance of doubt,
Recommended publications
  • Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents' Survey

    Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents' Survey

    Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents’ Survey - Summary Report Prepared by Buzz Channel and Auckland Transport September 2017 Waitākere Ranges Public Transport Survey – Summary Report Page 1 of 69 Executive summary Auckland Transport and the Waitakere Ranges Local Board have been investigating what Public Transport services may be needed in the Waitakere Ranges area. In March/April 2016, Auckland Transport held a survey for residents of the following areas: French Bay, Henderson Valley, Huia, KareKare, Konini (Kaurilands Rd, Daffodil St, Konini Rd), Laingholm, Oratia, Parau, Paturoa Bay, Piha, South Titirangi, Te Henga (Bethells Beach), Waiatarua, Wood Bay and Woodlands Park. These areas were targeted because they either have no current public transport service, have limited service, or were having services removed when the new West Auckland bus network was implemented in June 2017. Participation In total 839 feedback forms were received. The areas with the highest participation were Huia/Cornwallis/Parau with 116 residents from this area responding, followed by Wood Bay/French Bay/Paturoa Bay/South Titirangi with 108 respondents, and thirdly Piha with 101 respondents. Initial findings In order to determine if there is sufficient demand for any new services, data was grouped by potential routes; i.e. feedback from people who lived in the same area and whose chosen destinations could be accommodated by the same route, was analysed together. In most cases the numbers of people who said they would use each of these potential routes, and how often they said they would use them, was not sufficient to operate a viable bus service. However, two possible scheduled services were identified which could be viable and would warrant further investigation.
  • Titirangi West Including Oratia, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Konini, Waiatarua, Parau, Kaurilands, Huia, Cornwallis and Laingholm

    Titirangi West Including Oratia, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Konini, Waiatarua, Parau, Kaurilands, Huia, Cornwallis and Laingholm

    Titirangi West including Oratia, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Konini, Waiatarua, Parau, Kaurilands, Huia, Cornwallis and Laingholm he wooded suburb of Titirangi is inextricably linked with certain enduring images: Ttree-huggers, potters in home-spun jumpers, old Rovers in British-racing green with Greenpeace stickers, disappearing up bush-lined driveways. Trees are to Titirangi as coffee is to Ponsonby. Mention the place and most people think “bush”, and the 1970s vintage timber houses tucked out of sight, and often out of sun, amongst the trees. Many of Titirangi’s homes sit high above the Manukau Harbour with glorious sea views and distant city vistas. The suburb’s little village emphasises the feeling that you’re far from the madding crowd. Just five minutes up the road Oratia, with its big flat sections and views back towards the city, is one of the best-kept secrets of these parts. :DLWDNHUH Population Profile 6ZDQVRQ 5DQXL (GPRQWRQ Population 25,071 % Aged Under 15 Years 22.23 % Aged Over 65 Years 10.23 3DOP+HLJKWV *OHQGHQH % European 77.33 .HOVWRQ % Maori 7.24 % Pacific Peoples 4.45 2UDWLD 2UDWLD % Asian 5.48 .DXULODQGV *OHQ(GHQ6RXWK :DLDWDUXD *UHHQ%D\ Who Lives There? 7LWLUDQJL :RRG%D\ Traditionally, Titirangi has appealed to 0DFNLHV5HVW 0DFNLHV5HVW )UHQFK%D\ the artistically inclined and to bush-lovers. Alternative lifestylers and commuting /DLQJKROP professionals and every philosophy in between is represented here today. There’s 3DUDX continuing interest from British and South African migrants and even holidaymakers +XLD who become so smitten with the bush, &RUQZDOOLV the village and its laidback lifestyle that they move here.
  • Green Bay Titirangi Combined

    Green Bay Titirangi Combined

    Te Atatu Taipari Park Te Atatu Strand Taika Intermediate Westhaven T ta ria Rd Te Atatu Voyager NZ n Te Atatu Peninsula 1 Wynyard g Maritime d Quarter le R North t Museum R Lincoln S d Shops u Heights Ponsonby nt School Waitemata School o m 153 171X u a Atat Harbour 16 e St Marys W Jervois Rd Be Britomart ai T 172X 195 mu m u Rd Herne Bay Bay Cu sto Quay 207 ms St S St Marys Fo t Zita Maria Bayfield School rt St A Coxs Bay P Ponsonby College Victoria Sh n Park on t ort North Western Intermediate Park land S z Vector Col t a s W c Arena le n Ave o e a A g Welle Bow terloo Rd nby e t Rutherford d Hill ve Ponsonby bert S S Hukanui sl s High School En ey l Freemans Freemans St e t c Wes Coxs Bay Reserve Un C Qd R o A Albert M Bay ok S in Park d r o St Pauls Bay io t Park Parnell to Primary P W n rw College elli r Pt Chevalier n S t a g D Lincoln y to t Auckland n St l t d H S North Westmere t t S a University R S ow n r Mall Buses from Green Bay M o r G n ay Parnell r AUT arnet Rd e u Village lie area will no longer travel S n Lincoln R b ince St tanley U iv t S ersal Dr o West Richmond Rd p y V Meola Reef V n t F al ie Greyalong Lynn WilliamsonSchool Ave S Dr w eva Reserve Lynn He AGGS al Laidlaw lans ee P rs Rd Shops Auckland a e Western u v College into Grey Lynn Domain rne t Ch Seddon Q Central D Park ni Pomaria Rd haw Westmere Rd P d U Park R Fields ry p School Te Pai la School e a e Rd ymonds n ll R d S 16 eo St ah Park MOTAT en Pt Chevalier M n Allen Rd Grey ng Waitakere R Rd is a d Rd P Pt Meola Rd ill nc to r Auckland ch oma d School
  • Changes in Indigenous Ecosystems and the Environment Within the Boundary of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008: 2012-2

    Changes in Indigenous Ecosystems and the Environment Within the Boundary of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008: 2012-2

    Changes in Indigenous Ecosystems and the Environment within the Boundary of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008: 2012-2017 Report Todd Landers, Craig Bishop, Kristi Holland Grant Lawrence, Nick Waipara April 2018 Technical Report 2018/002 Changes in Indigenous Ecosystems and the Environment within the Boundary of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008: 2012-2017 Report April 2018 Technical Report 2018/002 Todd J Landers Craig D Bishop Kristi R Holland Grant R Lawrence Research and Evaluation Unit, Auckland Council Nick W Waipara Biosecurity, Environmental Services, Auckland Council Auckland Council Technical Report 2018/002 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-1-98-852994-3 (Print) ISBN 978-1-98-852995-0 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Review completed on 6 April 2018 Reviewed by two reviewers Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Eva McLaren Position: Acting Manager, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Name: Jacqueline Anthony Position: Manager, Environmental Monitoring, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Date: 6 April 2018 Recommended citation Landers, Todd J, Bishop, Craig D, Holland, Kristi R, Lawrence, Grant R and Waipara, Nick W (2018). Changes in indigenous ecosystems and the environment within the boundary of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008: 2012-2017 report. Auckland Council technical report, TR2018/002 © 2018 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction.
  • Consultation Summary and Decisions Report

    Consultation Summary and Decisions Report

    Consultation Summary and Decisions Report Bus Route Changes in Blockhouse Bay, Green Bay, Wood Bay, French Bay, Tanekaha, Titirangi, Laingholm, Kaurilands, and Glen Eden The consultation period ran from Monday 21 October to 4pm Friday 22 November 2013 i Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 1 2. Background .................................................................................................................. 1 3. Consultation Activities ................................................................................................. 2 4. Consultation Responses .............................................................................................. 2 5. Summary of Feedback ................................................................................................. 2 5.1 Current Travel Habits .............................................................................................. 2 Which bus routes did people use? .................................................................................. 3 How often do people use PT? ......................................................................................... 3 5.2 Future Bus Routes .................................................................................................. 4 Will the proposed changes encourage people to use PT more often? ............................ 4 Can people still get to where they need to? ...................................................................
  • Name Suburb Notes a Abbotleigh Avenue Te Atatu Peninsula Named C.1957. Houses Built 1957. Source: Geomaps Aerial Photo 1959

    Name Suburb Notes a Abbotleigh Avenue Te Atatu Peninsula Named C.1957. Houses Built 1957. Source: Geomaps Aerial Photo 1959

    Name Suburb Notes A Abbotleigh Avenue Te Atatu Peninsula Named c.1957. Houses built 1957. Source: Geomaps aerial photo 1959. Abel Tasman Ave Henderson Named 7/8/1973. Originally named Tasman Ave. Name changed to avoid confusion with four other Auckland streets. Abel Janszoon Tasman (1603-1659) was a Dutch navigator credited with being the discoverer of NZ in 1642. Located off Lincoln Rd. Access Road Kumeu Named between 1975-1991. Achilles Street New Lynn Named between 1943 and 1961. H.M.S. Achilles ship. Previously Rewa Rewa Street before 1930. From 1 March 1969 it became Hugh Brown Drive. Acmena Ave Waikumete Cemetery Named between 1991-2008. Adam Sunde Place Glen Eden West Houses built 1983. Addison Drive Glendene Houses built 1969. Off Hepburn Rd. Aditi Close Massey Formed 2006. Previously bush in 2001. Source: Geomaps aerial photo 2006. Adriatic Avenue Henderson Named c.1958. Geomaps aerial photo 1959. Subdivision of Adriatic Vineyard, which occupied 15 acres from corner of McLeod and Gt Nth Rd. The Adriatic is the long arm of the Mediterranean Sea which separates Italy from Yugoslavia and Albania. Aetna Place McLaren Park Named between 1975-1983. Located off Heremaia St. Subdivision of Public Vineyard. Source: Geomaps aerial photo 1959. Afton Place Ranui Houses built 1979. Agathis Rise Waikumete Cemetery Named between 1991-2008. Agathis australis is NZ kauri Ahu Ahu Track Karekare Named before 2014. The track runs from a bend in Te Ahu Ahu Road just before the A- frame house. The track follows the old bridle path on a steeply graded descent to Watchman Road.
  • Social and Geographical Differences in Road Traffic Injury in the Auckland Region

    Social and Geographical Differences in Road Traffic Injury in the Auckland Region

    Social and geographical differences in road traffic injury in the Auckland region Jamie Hosking, Shanthi Ameratunga, Daniel Exeter, Joanna Stewart Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland Produced for Auckland Transport, 2013. ISBN: 978‐0‐473‐24259‐6 Acknowledgements This report was informed by a stakeholder reference group, the members of which are listed below. This report does not necessarily represent the views of the host organisations of reference group members. Laura Ager ACC Moses Alatini Safekids New Zealand Melanie Bartlett New Zealand Transport Agency Andrew Bell Auckland Transport Julie Chambers Auckland District Health Board Angie Cheong Auckland Transport Juanita deSenna Auckland Transport Greer Hawley Auckland Transport John Kelly New Zealand Police Peter Sandiford Waitemata District Health Board The assistance of the following people and organisations with this report was greatly appreciated: Bridget Kool, Carol Chelimo, Sandar Tin Tin and Alex Macmillan, University of Auckland, for advice on hospitalisation and mortality data and analysis, census data, and travel survey data David Drodskie, Auckland Transport, for providing CAS data Simon Gianotti, ACC, for advice on ACC road traffic injury data Joyce‐Anne Raihania, Injury Prevention Network of Aotearoa New Zealand (IPNANZ), for advice on road traffic injuries among Māori John Wallwork, New Zealand Transport Agency, for advice on use of Driver Licence Registry data Ministry of Transport, for provision of New Zealand Household Travel Survey data Koordinates.com and the Local Government Commission of the Department of Internal Affairs, for provision of data on Auckland local board areas This work includes Statistics New Zealand’s data which are licensed by Statistics New Zealand for re‐ use under the Creative Commons Attribution‐Noncommercial 3.0 New Zealand license.
  • Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area

    Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area

    WAITĀKERE RANGES HERITAGE AREA Local Parks Design Guidelines Adopted December 2018 WAITĀKERE RANGES HERITAGE AREA | LOCAL PARKS DESIGN GUIDE | 1 Figure 1. Luke Harvey, 2014 Cover image: Huia, Jay Farnworth, 2014 2 Table of contents Section 1. Overview 1.1 Purpose 6 1.2 The Role of Stakeholder Groups 8 1.3 How to use this Guide 9 1.4 The Policy Context 10 1.5 The Heritage Area 12 1.6 Auckland Unitary Plan Zoning 13 1.7 Landscape and Historical Context 14 1.8 Brief Pictorial History 16 Section 2. Local park environments 2.1 Summary of Local Park Environments 21 2.2 Native Forest Park Environment 22 2.3 Coastal (Harbour) Park Environment 24 2.4 Coastal (Sea) Park Environment 26 2.5 Open/Grassed Park Environment 28 2.6 Riparian Park Environment 30 2.7 Thoroughfare/Accessway Park Environment 32 2.8 Village Centre Park Environment 34 Section 3. Design principles and guidance 3.1 Overall Design Principles 38 3.2 Design Guidance 40 3.3 Park Furniture 42 3.4 Tracks, Paths, Boardwalks, Bridges and Lookouts 48 3.5 Barriers, Bollards, Retaining Walls and Gates 51 3.6 Buildings, Shelters and Toilets 54 3.7 Carparking 57 3.8 Playgrounds, Hardcourts and Skateparks 60 3.9 Planting 62 3.10 Community Art 66 3.11 Signage 68 Section 4. References Section 5. Appendices Figure 2. Kauri tree, Jay Farnworth, 2015. 4 1.0 Overview 1.1 Purpose 1.1.1 The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Objectives Section 8 of the Act sets out the objectives of establishing The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area comprises some 27,000 and maintaining the heritage area, including: hectares of public and private land.
  • The Glen Eden Project

    The Glen Eden Project

    The Glen Eden Project Phase 1 Report Compiled by: Sue Berman on behalf of LIFEWISE Family Services. September 2010 P a g e | 2 Nau mai haere mai Warm Pacific greetings To all people with a heart, hands and mind for what’s happening in Glen Eden. Thank you to all who have contributed to what we have learnt about Glen Eden. There is still much to add and we welcome the dialogue. P a g e | 3 Table of Contents Summary Overview ................................................................................................................................. 5 The Project Brief ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Glen Eden Community Profile ................................................................................................................. 8 A brief history...................................................................................................................................... 8 Glen Eden today .................................................................................................................................. 9 Demographics ................................................................................................................................... 10 Population figures ........................................................................................................................
  • The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details

    The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details

    T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 1 This document can be cited as: Greaves, L. M., Krynen, A. M., Rapson, A. B., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling procedure and technical details. Unpublished technical report, The University of Auckland. The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details Report prepared by Lara Greaves, Research Intern, and Ariana Krynen and Angela Rapson, 2011 Summer Scholarship recipients for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS), University of Auckland. All analyses conducted by Dr. Chris Sibley. Dr. Chris Sibley, Primary Investigator for the NZAVS, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/chris-sibley/ New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study Website: http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/nzavs Note for researchers: A copy of the technical report detailing the scales and questionnaire items used in the NZAVS-10 is available from Dr. Chris Sibley upon request. T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Sampling procedure ............................................................................................................................ 4 Demographics ....................................................................................................................................
  • Waitākere Ranges Local Board Meeting Held on 9/26/2019

    Waitākere Ranges Local Board Meeting Held on 9/26/2019

    Waitākere Ranges Tranche 1 Park List t r a Named n Not Te Reo European c Site Description Notes Local Board Street Suburb SAP ID after Research Source Additional Research h Named Name Name e Street # farmland) which was either part Waitakere City Council. (2000). Kaurilands Domain were vested +++ joins Kaurilands of a residential subdivision or Ceramco Park and Kaurilands with Council between 1958 and Waitakere 11471- 1 Ceramco Park Reserve NB: also connects to Glendale Road Glen Eden Yes quarried for clay by the Domain reserve management plan. 1984. Ceramco Park is made up Ranges L100 Twin Creek Cycle Way Amalgamated Brick and Pipe Auckland, N.Z.: Waitakere City of several parcels of land Co. (Ceramco Council. (originally Waitakere street names. Retrieved Clayburn Road - Glen Eden: Waitakere 22520- July 23, 2018, from 1 Clayburn Reserve Clayburn Road Glen Eden Yes Named well before 1961. See Ranges L100 https://www.aucklandlibraries.govt.n also Claywest Place. z/Pages/waitak Waitakere 22010- 1 Foothills Lane Reserve Foothills Lane Glen Eden Yes Ranges L100 Waitakere 21191- 1 Gill Esplanade ++ edges Little Muddy Creek Landing Road Titirangi Yes Ranges L100 Close to Glucina Place, which Davenport, J. C. (1990). Street Waitakere Palm Court 21108- was named after Ivan Glucina 1 Glucina Reserve Glen Eden Yes names of Auckland: their story. Ranges Drive L100 who had a vineyard here during Akld, N.Z: Hodder &Stoughton. the earlier part of the 20th much older name for Henderson their story. Auckland, N.Z: Hodder opened for settlement shortly Valley is Opanuku (belonging to & Stoughton Waitakere City after 1911, when the Coronation Waitakere Henderson 20589- 1 Henderson Valley Scenic Candia Road Yes Panuku - a famous ancestor of Council.
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units

    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units

    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.