DOCSLIB.ORG

Request for Proposals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request for Proposals REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE GENEVA ROAD AREA-WIDE PLAN Issued September 18, 2017 City of Orem 56 North State Street Orem Utah 84057 CITY OF OREM |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 The Successful Applicant ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Fixed-Fee Contract and EPA Funding .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Project Background and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Relevant Plans and Studies ................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 EPA Brownfields Area-Wide Planning ................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Outline of Tasks and Deliverables ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Alternative Scenarios of Development ............................................................................................... 6 2.3 Public Outreach and Meetings ............................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Goals and Plan Finalization ................................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Zoning Ordinance ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.0 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................. 11 4.0 Proposal Submittal Requirements ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Content of Proposal .......................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Inquiries Concerning the RFP ............................................................................................................ 12 4.3 Format, Submission, and Deadline of Proposal Submittal ............................................................... 13 4.4 RFP Timeline ...................................................................................................................................... 13 5.0 Billing Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 14 6.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................ 14 6.1 Minimum Limits of Insurance ........................................................................................................... 14 6.2 Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions ......................................................................................... 14 6.3 Notice of Incident or Accident .......................................................................................................... 14 6.4 Other Insurance Provisions ............................................................................................................... 15 6.5 Workers’ Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage ............................................................. 15 6.6 All Coverage’s .................................................................................................................................... 15 6.7 Acceptability of Insurers ................................................................................................................... 15 6.8 Verification of Coverage ................................................................................................................... 15 6.9 Subcontractors .................................................................................................................................. 16 7.0 Terms and Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 16 1 CITY OF OREM |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Orem (the City) is requesting proposals for the preparation of the Geneva Road Area- Wide Plan (GRAP). This project will provide an area-wide plan for the Geneva Road Area (GRA), which will include a focus on potential brownfields, establishing effective redevelopment policies, identifying future assessment and cleanup funding options, and outlining strategies and tools for future redevelopment sites within the study area. It is anticipated that this plan will be completed concurrently over a period of twelve months. The Geneva Road Area 1.2 THE SUCCESSFUL APPLICANT The successful applicant must have considerable experience with brownfields and redevelop- ment, and a pragmatic approach to the work which results in realistic outcomes and relies extensively on collaboration with local stakeholders. Experience in completing other EPA funded Brownfield Area-Wide Plans will be highly preferred. 1.3 FIXED-FEE CONTRACT AND EPA FUNDING The successful applicant will be paid based on a not-to-exceed fixed-fee amount for contracted services as explained in section 5.0 “Billing Requirements.” Tasks 2.1 - 2.4 (as outlined in section 2.0) will be funded by a grant from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and supplemented by City funds. Task 2.5 will be funded solely by the City. In accordance with the EPA grant rules, the selected contractor to comply with the applicable federal rules outlined in 2 CFR Part 200.318-326 (www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=2:1.1.2.2.1.4.31&rgn=div7). For more information on this program visit: www.epa.gov/brownfields/types-brownfields-grant-funding. 2 CITY OF OREM |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1.4 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The City of Orem is the fifth largest municipality in Utah with a 2016 estimated population of roughly 97,500 residents. Orem is located in the heart of Utah County, approximately 45 miles south of Salt Lake City. Utah County is currently experiencing significant population growth and is expected add roughly 400,000 new residents by 2040; the City of Orem is projected to grow by 15,000 residents during that period (according to 2012 baseline population projections provided by the Utah Governor’s Office of Management & Budget). The City of Orem is experiencing tremendous development pressure due to many factors, including a strong regional economy; proximity to two major universities (Brigham Young University in Provo with 31,000 students and Utah Valley University in Orem with 33,000 students); a high birth rate; and a high quality of life (#1 in Gallup Poll 2014 Well-Being Index, The Brookings Institute Fastest Job Growth during first quarter 2015; Forbes #1 Best Medium-Sized City for jobs 2015; Forbes #2 Best Housing Market for 2015; Millen Institute #3 Best-Performing Large Cities 2014 & 2015). With a limited amount of remaining undeveloped land, the majority of Orem’s growth is expected to occur through the redevelopment of existing sites throughout the City. This has shifted the City Council and City staff’s focus from large greenfield developments towards infill, redevelopment, and appropriate preservation policies. Orem experienced double digit growth in the late 1980s and 1990s and developed as the commercial and retail center of Utah County. The City continues to capture just over 1/4 of the retail sales in the County today. Redevelopment areas (RDAs) were established during this time to leverage Orem’s economic development assets and promote development. Three were established on State Street, two on University Parkway, one at the Canyon Park Technology Center (the former WordPerfect campus), and one at the Orem Business Park (located near the University Parkway and Geneva Road intersection). As of today, six of the seven RDAs have expired. The Challenge of the Geneva Road Area The GRA has been an important industrial, employment, and residential area for the City of Orem and Utah County since the 1940’s. The area grew around the Geneva Steel plant (located in the nearby city of Vineyard), which opened in the early 1940s as an integral part of the war effort. It served as a significant regional employer and economic engine until its closure in 2001. This resulted in the loss of nearly 900 jobs. While the closure of the plant had a negative impact on the local economy, the remediation and development of the Geneva Steel property has brought significant new growth. However, despite development pressures related to the lack of readily developable land in central Utah County, several properties in the GRA located in Orem are underutilized and vacant. It is suspected that this is related to three major issues: (1) the risk of financial exposure to potential investors/developers due to the possibility of brownfield 3 CITY OF OREM |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS contamination, (2) the lack of a plan for the area, and (3) the limitations of current zoning (the area is zoned primarily industrial). The City expects that the GRAP will address
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genevaa Road D Area A-Wide Plan
    GENEVA ROAD AREA-WIDE PLAN Review of Plans Report IMAGINE OREM: GENEVA ROAD AREA‐WIDE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 BROWNFIELDS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 BROWNFIELD AREA‐WIDE PLANNING PROGRAM ....................................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT AREA .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 COMMUNITY PROFILE ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ................................................................................................................................................... 6 OREM GENERAL PLAN 2011 (LAST AMENDED 2016) ............................................................................................................. 6 OREM TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN (2015) ................................................................................................................... 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN (2014) ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Vineyard Utah 2019 – 2020
    S P E C K & A S S O C I A T E S L L C DOWNTOWN VINEYARD UTAH 2019 – 2020 A central “square-about” creates a large public space while distributing traffic onto smaller local streets. Completed with DPZ Co-Design In what will be the largest Transit-Oriented Development in Utah, this plan places a new downtown on the 294-acre brownfield formerly occupied by the Geneva Steel Mill, soon to be the location of a stop on the FrontRunner commuter rail that connects Salt Lake City to Provo, and eventual TRAX light rail as well. The site conveniently lies between a growing Utah Valley University Campus, just across the railbed to the east, and the coast of picturesque Utah Lake to the west. Vineyard is one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S., but thus far has not developed any of the mixed-use walkable urbanism that can be found in the state’s older communities. This plan re-centers Vineyard on its rail stop, and shapes roughly three million square feet of new growth into a complete community of places to live, work, shop, worship, and recreate. Taking advantage of its large site, the plan is organized as two neighborhoods, each centered on a linear promenade reaching to the lakefront and connected by a main avenue. The larger promenade, illustrated above, terminates on a civic square, which then transitions to a “shared space” main street reaching to the station plaza. The square itself functions as a traffic distribution device, like a roundabout, so that no one street beyond it need contain more than two driving lanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Road Imagine Orem: Geneva Road
    GENEVA ROAD IMAGINE OREM: GENEVA ROAD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OREM CITY COUNCIL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Richard Brunst, Mayor City of Orem Debby Lauret, Council City of Vineyard Sam Lentz, Council Economic Development Corporation of Utah Tom Macdonald, Council Mountainland Association of Governments Mark Seastrand, Council Utah Valley University David Spencer, Council Utah County Health Department Brent Sumner, Council Utah Transit Authority Utah Department of Transportation OREM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Utah Department of Environmental Quality Ross Spencer, Chair United States Environmental Protection Agency Carl Cook Mickey Cochran OREM CITY STAFF Camille Jensen Emily Guffin, Long Range Planner Barry Roberts J. Kirby Snideman, AICP, Long Range Planner Mike Staker Jason Bench, AICP, Planning Division Manager David Moulton Bill Bell, Development Services Director Ryan Clark, Economic Development Director Paul Goodrich, Transportation Engineer PLANNING CONSULTANTS BRS, Inc. WRT This project has been funded, wholly or in part, by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 5 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION PAGE 11 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE ANALYSIS PAGE 21 CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION PAGE 33 CHAPTER 5 MARKET ANALYSIS PAGE 44 CHAPTER 6 REDEVELOPMENT PAGE 51 CHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION PAGE 63 3 IMAGINEOREM GENERAL OREM: PLANGENEVA ROAD 1 EXecUTIve SUMMarY IMAGINE OREM: GENEVA ROAD 1.1 PAN OVERVIEW In 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The Imagine Orem: Geneva Road plan will provide direction for selected the City of Orem as a Brownfield Area-Wide Plan future brownfields area improvements that are: (AWP) grant recipient.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehi Historic Archive File Categories Achievements of Lehi Citizens
    Lehi Historic Archive File Categories Achievements of Lehi Citizens Alpine School District Alpine, Utah American Fork Canyon American Fork City American Legion/Veterans Ancient Utah Fossils and Rock Art Antiquities Act Andrew Fjeld Bates Service Station Broadbents Store Broadbent Photograph Collection/Broadbent Photographers Buffalo Cabelas Store Camp Floyd Camp Floyd-Fairfield/Frogtown Camp Floyd-Benefit to Lehi Residents Camp Floyd-James Buchanan Camp Floyd-Mormon:The Move South Camp Floyd-Soldiers Camp Floyd-Utah War Camp Floyd Mining District Camp Williams Cedar Fort, Utah (Cedar Valley) Chief Arapeen Chief Peteetneet Citizen Interview-Alta Nielson Citizen Interview-Alvin Schow Citizen Interview-Audrey Wilson Citizen Interview-Boyd Holmstead Citizen Interview-Cliff Austin Citizen Interview-Dale Peterson Citizen Interview-Elwin Barnes Citizen Interview-Esther Hebrew Citizen Interview-Ethel Watkins Citizen Interview-Eva L. Colledge Oxborrow Johnson Citizen Interview-Fawn Willes Citizen Interview-Garn Holbrook Citizen Interview-Gene Phillips Citizen Interview-George Ricks Citizen Interview-George Tripp Citizen Interview-Geraldine Ekins Citizen Interview-J.B. Cooper Citizen Interview-Jetta Fowler Allred Citizen Interview-LaRue Dorton Citizen Interview-Lenore and Evan Colledge Citizen Interview-Leo and Edna Loveridge Citizen Interview-Lucille White Citizen Interview-Mr. and Mrs. Randall Schow Citizen Interview-Barbara Smith Citizen Interview-Oliver Smith Citizen Interview-Ray Andreason Citizen Interview-Rose Wilkin Citizen Interview-Russell
    [Show full text]
  • Provo-Orem, Utah
    COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Provo-Orem, Utah U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research As of April 1, 2019 Provo-Orem, Utah Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis as of April 1, 2019 Executive Summary 2 Davis GREAT SALT Major Roads Summit ¨¦§80 LAKE Major Waterbodies Salt Lake Elko Urbanized Areas Provo-Orem HMA Tooele Wasatch UTAH LAKE UTAH NEVADA Duchesne Utah Juab Carbon ¨¦§15 White White Pine Executive Summary Sanpete Millard Emery Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA Housing Market Area Description Salt Lake The Provo-Orem Housing Market Area (HMA) is coterminous with ! Lehi Wasatch ! American Fork ! Saratoga Springs ! Pleasant Grove the Provo-Orem, UT Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), consisting Eagle Mountain ! ! ! Orem of Utah and Juab Counties. The HMA is one of three metropolitan Vineyard ! Tooele Provo areas comprising the Salt Lake City-Provo-Orem Combined UTAH LAKE Statistical Area, a region of more than 2.61 million residents along ! Spanish Fork the Wasatch Mountain Range (Wasatch Front, hereafter). The current HMA population is estimated at 657,900. ¨¦§15 Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA The presence of two universities, Brigham Young University (BYU) and Utah Valley University (UVU), has resulted in a highly educated Tools and Resources workforce and a growing number of high-tech jobs in the area. Find interim updates for this metropolitan area, and select geographies nationally, at PD&R’s Market-at-a-Glance tool. Additional data for the HMA can be found in this report’s supplemental tables. For information on HUD-supported activity in this area, see the Community Assessment Reporting Tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Steel and the American West
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library “THIS STRANGE ENTERPRISE”: GENEVA STEEL AND THE AMERICAN WEST by Craig Loal Whetten A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History The University of Utah December 2011 Copyright © Craig Loal Whetten 2011 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of CRAIG LOAL WHETTEN has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: GREGORY SMOAK , Chair 08/02/2011 Date Approved MATTHEW BASSO , Member 08/02/2011 Date Approved W. PAUL REEVE , Member 08/02/2011 Date Approved and by ISABEL MOREIRA , Chair of the Department of HISTORY and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Historians of the American West have often used the dichotomy of federal involvement and local exceptionalism to frame the patterns of Western history as well as the direction of Western historiography. To the most famous of early Western historians, the West offered the truest version of what it meant to be American and resulted from individual efforts that yielded positive national results. Yet, some more recent New Western historians suggest that the conquest of the West evidences the worst of what it means to be American and that federal efforts yielded negative local results. This thesis argues that the history of the Geneva plant in Orem, Utah illustrates a comprehensive view of the West as a confluence of federal, regional, and local involvement that produced dynamic situations only understood when considering these three powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Steel: from Dinosaur to Modern Mill
    ................................................................ ....................................... !l ............................ NTION L~~JC~Lf~f- ‘-83273 by Barbara Quinn, ContributingEditor Geneva Steel: From Dinosaur to Modern Mill s hokey as it lion and, perhaps most produced an astronomical that captures sulfur dioxide sounds, this daunting, the giant steelmak- reduction in particulate.” emissions and converts them started out largely er set a brutal deadline by The open hearth furnace into solid elemental sulfur, as a community which the plant would be was replaced with $80 mil- which is then sold to manu- service project,” said Joe sold. Until that deadline, lion Basic Oxygen Process facturers of fertilizer and Cannon, CEO of Geneva U.S. Steel agreed to keep its (Q-BOP) furnaces. The new other products. Each day, five Steel and former U.S. Envi- coke ovens operating in a furnaces employ oxygen, tons of sulfur are produced ronmental Protection Agency “standby” mode. If the ovens rather than air, to virtually by the system, producing a (EPA) assistant administrator were allowed to cool, they eliminate the conversion of 95 percent reduction in the for air and radiation. “This” would be so severely nitrogen from the combus- plant’s daily sulfur emis- was the 1985 purchase of a damaged that bringing the tion process into nitrogen sions. While these two new steel mill that sprawls across plant back on line would be oxide and, eventually ni- systems successfully pre- some 1800 acres of Provo, financially impossible. vented the release of massive Utah and employs some The eventual purchase of volumes of PM10, other sys- 2000 people. And, what the mill by Cannon and a tems also contributed to the started out as a community group of investors is one of plant’s overall emissions re- service project has evolved the David-and-Goliath sagas duction, including the bag- into an exceptional example of American business, but house filtering system - a of pollution prevention and the pollution prevention part “widget” - attached to the industrial modernization.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Most Demanding Customer
    DOING WHAT’S BEST FOR Our Most Demanding Customer 1 REPORT 2020 SUSTAINABILITY There is one customer above all others. The biggest. The most demanding. The most vital. Where the stakes are the highest. That customer is planet Earth. And what it needs from us is a cleaner environment, stronger communities, equity, and fairness. 2 I Executive Letter II About U. S. Steel III ESG at U. S. Steel IV Celebrating Innovation V Empowering People TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE VI Protecting the Environment VII Ethics and Compliance: Our Foundation VIII Corporate Governance IX Chief Strategy and Sustainability Officer Letter X GRI/SASB Index Appendix U. S. STEEL Sustainability Report 3 MESSAGE FROM OUR PRESIDENT & CEO The world’s modern history has been defined by setting bold Before turning more fully to the future, I want to offer a few goals —­­ and then coming together to achieve them. These words of reflection on 2020. Our Best of BothSM integrated and include the ones that have literally changed our world: the mini mill world competitive innovative strategy quickly became moon landing, the end of the First and Second World Wars, our Best for All strategy, as the realities of 2020 accelerated the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the development of the our need to get to the future faster. This past year was like COVID vaccine. At U. S. Steel, we refer to this magnitude of none in my memory. The resilience of our people throughout transformational change as a BHAG. This same commitment is the COVID-19 pandemic was truly inspirational.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnet, Iron Ore in Iron County
    IRON ORE IN IRON COUNTY UTAH BY G.D. MACDONALD III © 1991 j, The Magnet Iron Ore In Iron County, Utah CONTRIBUTIONS THE IRON ORE DEPOSITS IN SOUTHERN UTAH HA VE MADE TOWARD THE HISTORIC AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES. BY G.D. MACDONALD III © 1990 CEDAR CITY, UT AH CEDAR CITY, IRON COUNTY, UTAH "HOME BASE FOR THE IRON MINES BF - SITE OF 1852 BLAST FURNACE CC - CEDAR CANYON, SOURCE OF COAL, LIMESTONE AND TIMBER FOR LUMBER AND FIREWOOD '\ '° \...BRYCE CANYON & U.5.89 ....... THE MAGNET About The Author Graham Duncan MacDonald III was born in Kanab, Kane County, Utah, March 25, 1915. After graduation from the Kanab High School he decided to try for a college education. This was during the depression years and he had no bank account. He would work a while and go to school until the cash was gone. It took seven years to earn a degree in Civil Engineering at the University of Utah, graduating with honors in 1939. He began his mining career October 1, 1940 when he was hired as an engineer for the Columbia Iron Mining Company a U.S. Steel subsidiary. He was the twenty­ first man on the payroll at the Iron Mountain mine which at that time was hidden in the cedar trees twenty-four miles west from Cedar City, Utah before zip codes. He was promoted to Mine Engineer in 1944 and to Ore Mine Superintendent in 1945. At the time the Columbia Geneva Steel Division of U.S. Steel was formed December 1, 1952, he became General Superintendent-Iron Mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Pacific Railroad V. Utah Department of Transportation; and Utah Public Service Commission : Brief of Appellant Utah Supreme Court
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Supreme Court Briefs 2011 Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah Department of Transportation; and Utah Public Service Commission : Brief of Appellant Utah Supreme Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Dennis M. Astill; Dennis M. Astill, PC; Counsel for Anderson Geneva; Brent A. Burnett; Assistant Attorney General; Counsel for UDOT; David L. Church; Blaisdell and Church; Counsel for Town of Vineyard; Bruce Jones; UTA; Counsel for UTA; Utah Public Service Commission; Reha Kamas; Union Pacific Railroad Company; Attorneys for Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Company. Recommended Citation Brief of Appellant, Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah Department of Transportation; and Utah Public Service Commission, No. 20110326.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 2011). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2/3106 This Brief of Appellant is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. IN THE UTAH SUPREME COURT Union Pacific Railroad, Petitioner, Supreme Court Case No. 20110326-SC (PSC Docket No. 09-888-01) v. Nature of Proceeding: Appeal Utah Department of Transportation; and Utah Public Service Commission, ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Respondents.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Steel Company V. Utah Tax Commission of Utah : Brief of Appellant Utah Supreme Court
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Supreme Court Briefs 1948 Geneva Steel Company v. Utah Tax Commission of Utah : Brief of Appellant Utah Supreme Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. C.C.Parson; WM.M.McCrea; A.D.Moffat; Calvin A. Behle; Attorneys for Plaintiff. Unknown. Recommended Citation Brief of Appellant, Geneva Steel Company v. Utah Tax Commission of Utah, No. 19487236.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 1948). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1/11 This Brief of Appellant is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. ITA!1 UTAH SUPR::ME COURT ),.- c:_;rvr::tn :FU BRIEF_ f5.9 59 J.2,3L.e PI _;J )QCKET NO. • •""~;,) IN THE Supreme Court OF THE STATE OF UTAH GENEVA STEEL COMPANY, a corporation, v. THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF UTAH, Defendant. BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF C. C. PARSONS, WM. M. McCREA, A. D. :MOFFAT, CALVIN A. BEHLE, .Attomeys for Plaintiff. Pltt•TED t• '1, S. A.-.JOE R.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Closure Permit
    Draft POST-CLOSURE PERMIT For Post-Closure Care of three Closed Hazardous Waste Surface Impoundments and Facility Wide Corrective Action Issued To United States Steel Corporation (USS) and Anderson Geneva, LLC and Ice Castle Retirement Fund, LLC EPA #UTD009086133 Issued May 14, 2004 Updated January 26, 2010 UTAH HAZARDOUS WASTE POST-CLOSURE PERMIT For Post-Closure Care of Three Closed Hazardous Waste Surface Impoundments and Facility-Wide Corrective Action Issued To United States Steel Corporation, (USS) and Anderson Geneva, LLC and Ice Castle Retirement Fund, LLC EPA Identification Number UTD009086133 Issued May 14, 2004 Updated January 26, 2010 May 14, 2004 STATE OF UTAH PERMIT Permittee: United States Steel Corporation (USS) and Anderson Geneva, LLC and Ice Castle Retirement Fund, LLC Utah County, Utah EPA Identification Number UTD009086133 Pursuant to the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act, (the Act), 19-6-101, et. seq., Utah Code Annotated (UCA) 1953, as amended and the Utah Administrative Rules (R315-1 through R315-13, R315-50, and R315-101) as adopted by the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board, (the Board), a permit is issued to United States Steel Corporation (USS) and Anderson Geneva, LLC and Ice Castle Retirement Fund, LLC thereafter called the Permittee, to conduct Post-Closure Care of three hazardous waste surface impoundments closed in place and to conduct facility-wide corrective action at Anderson Geneva Development Inc., 99 North Geneva Road, Vineyard, Utah, 84057. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has authorized the Executive Secretary to issue such a permit under Section 3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
    [Show full text]