DOCSLIB.ORG

Basic Aviation Risk Standard Implementation Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basic Aviation Risk Standard Implementation Guidelines Basic Aviation Risk Standard Implementation Guidelines Version 5, May 2014 The International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) supports the use of the Basic Aviation Risk Standard (BARS) to improve aviation safety. BARS is specifically aimed at contributing to improved aviation safety in the resource sector and was developed by the Flight Safety Foundation in conjunction with a number of extractive industry companies, including several ICMM member companies. The standard is developed from a risk-based model framed against the actual threats posed to aviation operations which are then directly linked to associated controls and recovery and mitigation measures. BARS is a useful resource for any organization wanting to develop new flight safety requirements or review existing ones. Putting South Africa First “We direct so much of our time and treasure towards the control of risk not because we are timid, but because it allows us to use aviation to do extraordinary things.” Bill Voss, Flight Safety Foundation CEO and President, 2006–2012 BARS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Contents A. Introduction ................................................................................................................ xi A.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................... xi A.2 Document Structure ........................................................................................ xi A.3 Variances ....................................................................................................... xii B. BARS Audit and Company Operational Review .......................................................... xiii B.1 Two-dimensional Approach to Aviation Assurance ............................................. xiii B.2 BARS Accredited Audit .................................................................................... xiv B.3 Company Specific Operational Review .............................................................. xiv 1.0: All Threats: Common Controls .................................................................................... 1 1.1: Approved Aircraft Operator ............................................................................. 1 1.2: Flight Crew Qualifications, Experience and Recency ........................................... 2 1.3: Flight Crew Check and Training ........................................................................ 3 1.4: Maintenance Personnel Qualification ............................................................... 7 1.5: Maintenance Training ...................................................................................... 8 1.6: Basic Aircraft Equipment Fit ............................................................................. 8 1.7: Drug and Alcohol Policy ................................................................................... 9 1.8: Flight Time Limits ............................................................................................ 9 1.9: Flight Crew Duty Time ..................................................................................... 10 1.10: Maintenance Duty Time .................................................................................. 11 1.11: Aircraft Operator Safety Management System .................................................. 12 1.12: Accident and Incident Notification ................................................................... 13 1.13: Operational Risk Assessment ........................................................................... 13 1.14: Sub-chartering Aircraft .................................................................................... 14 2.0: Runway Excursions...................................................................................................... 15 2.1: Airfield and Helipad Design ............................................................................. 16 2.2: Airfield Inspections ......................................................................................... 17 2.3: Landing Site Assessments ................................................................................ 17 2.4: Balanced Field Length ..................................................................................... 18 2.5: Balanced Field Length – No Performance Charts ................................................ 19 2.6: Destination Weather Reporting ........................................................................ 20 2.7: Slope guidance ............................................................................................... 20 Page iii 3.0: Fuel Exhaustion ........................................................................................................... 21 3.1: Fuel Check...................................................................................................... 22 3.2: Flight Plan Weather Data ................................................................................. 23 3.3: Flight Plan ...................................................................................................... 23 3.4: Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Fuel Plan ............................................................. 24 3.5: Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Fuel Plan .................................................................... 25 3.6: Hot Refueling ................................................................................................. 25 4.0: Fuel Contamination ..................................................................................................... 28 4.1: Fuel Testing .................................................................................................... 28 4.2: Fuel Filtration ................................................................................................. 29 4.3: Fuel Sampling ................................................................................................. 29 4.4: Fuel Storage ................................................................................................... 30 4.5: Drummed Fuel ................................................................................................ 31 5.0: Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) ........................................................................... 32 5.1: Night or Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) – Two Crew Operations ............................ 33 5.2: Special VFR Procedures ................................................................................... 34 5.3: Night or IFR – Aircraft ..................................................................................... 34 5.4: Night or IFR – Flight Planning .......................................................................... 34 5.5: Night or IFR – Simulator Training ...................................................................... 35 5.6: Night or IFR – Approach/Landing Recency ......................................................... 35 5.7: Night or IFR – Autopilot .................................................................................. 36 5.8: Stabilized Approaches ..................................................................................... 37 5.9: Mandatory Go-around Procedures .................................................................... 38 5.10: Flight Data Monitoring .................................................................................... 39 5.11: Multi-crew Operations .................................................................................... 40 5.12: CRM/ADM Training .......................................................................................... 40 5.13: Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS) ....................................................... 41 6.0: Incorrect Loading ........................................................................................................ 42 6.1: Passenger Weight .......................................................................................... 43 6.2: Cargo Weight and Loading .............................................................................. 44 6.3: Load and Trim Calculations .............................................................................. 44 6.4: Manifest ........................................................................................................ 45 6.5: Dangerous Goods Cargo (Hazardous Materials) ............................................... 46 6.6: Passenger Briefing .......................................................................................... 47 6.7: Multi-language Briefing .................................................................................. 48 Page iv 7.0: Collision on Ground .................................................................................................... 49 7.1: Passenger Terminal Area ................................................................................. 49 7.2: Designated Freight Areas ................................................................................ 50 7.3: Passenger Control ........................................................................................... 50 7.4: Ground Procedures ......................................................................................... 51 7.5: Rotors Running Load/Unload ........................................................................... 51 7.6: Parking Apron ................................................................................................. 52 7.7: Perimeter Fence .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT)
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administraiton (FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) Responsible Official David E. Gray Program Manager [email protected] Approving Official Claire W. Barrett Chief Privacy & Information Asset Officer Office of the Chief Information Officer [email protected] 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Executive Summary On May 28, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) final rule mandating that aircraft flying in certain controlled airspace be equipped with ADS-B Out capability not later than January 1, 2020.1 In turn, the FAA developed the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) to assist pilots, dispatchers, and commercial operators in checking their predicted navigation and surveillance availability before a flight as well as handle requests for Air Traffic Control (ATC) authorization pursuant to 14 CFR § 91.225(g). The SAPT has three main components: Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) SAPT, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) SAPT, and ADS-B Deviation Authorization Pre-Flight Tool (ADAPT). This Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was developed pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002 because the SAPT includes a web-based capability to collect and manage Personally Identifiable Information (PII) captured from aircraft operators to facilitate the automated handling of ATC authorization requests and FAA’s responses. What is a Privacy Impact Assessment? The Privacy Act of 1974 articulates concepts for how the federal government should treat individuals and their information and imposes duties upon federal agencies regarding the collection, use, dissemination, and maintenance of personally identifiable information (PII).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Definitions
    Aviation Definitions: A Air Carrier - A commercial airline with published schedules operating at least five round trips per week. Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - The official, FAA approved map of an airport's facilities Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)- A facility providing air traffic control to aircraft on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. Air Taxi - An aircraft certificated for commercial service available for hire on demand. Air Traffic Control (ATC)- The control of aircraft traffic, in the vicinity of airports from control towers, and in the airways between airports from control centers Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)- A central operations tower in the terminal air traffic control system with an associated IFR room if radar equipped, using air/ground communications and/or radar, visual signaling and other devices to provide safe, expeditious movement of air traffic. Altitude MSL - Aircraft altitude measured in feet above mean sea level. Approach Lighting System (ALS) - Radiating light beams guiding pilots to the extended centerline of the runway on final approach and landing. Approach Lights - High intensity lights located along the approach path at the end of an instrument runway. Approach lights aid the pilot in the transition from instrument flight conditions to visual conditions at the end of an instrument approach. Arrival - The act of landing at an airport. Arrival Procedure - A series of directions from air traffic control, using fixes and procedures, to guide an aircraft from the enroute environment to an airport for landing. Arrival Stream - A flow of aircraft following similar arrival procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Garland/ DFW Heloplex
    STATEWIDE BENEFITS THE TEXAS AIRPORT SYSTEM FROM AVIATION The Texas airport system with 289 airports is one of Air Medical and CareFlight, are based at general aviation The total impacts of Texas system airports amount the largest airport systems in the country. It consists airports throughout Texas in order to provide life-saving to 778,955 jobs that received $30.1 billion in wages of 25 commercial service airports and 264 general emergency flights where needed. Aircraft manufacturing and benefits. These workers generated $94.3 billion aviation airports. These airports play an important role takes place at Kerrville Municipal Airport in the Mooney in economic output. On top of this, the Texas airport in the Texas economy by providing well-paying jobs, factory. These airports support firefighting and disaster relief system provides countless benefits that improve stimulating growth, and serving as critical components in efforts. Aviation schools found on general aviation airports the health, safety, welfare, and quality of life for the a transportation network that permits the movement of feature training for aircraft mechanics, fixed-wing pilots, people of Texas. people and goods across the state, throughout the country, helicopter pilots, skydivers, and even drone pilots. Military and around the world. These airports are responsible for aircrews make use of many general aviation airports for Furthermore, more than 17 million visitors passed billions of dollars of economic activity, and support a training purposes. Finally, more than a dozen Texas general through the state’s commercial service airports, with wide assortment of businesses and activities. The state’s aviation airports host aviation museums and other nonprofit another 1.5 million visitors making use of the Lone commercial service airports serve as hubs for United aerospace organizations that educate and promote the Star State’s general aviation services.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards
    FAA-S-ACS-8B (with Change 1) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards June 2018 Flight Standards Service Washington, DC 20591 Acknowledgments The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Safety Standards, Regulatory Support Division, Airman Testing Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125 developed this Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document with the assistance of the aviation community. The FAA gratefully acknowledges the valuable support from the many individuals and organizations who contributed their time and expertise to assist in this endeavor. Availability This ACS is available for download from www.faa.gov. Please send comments regarding this document using the following link to the Airman Testing Branch Mailbox. Material in FAA-S-ACS-8B will be effective June 11, 2018. All previous editions of the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards will be obsolete as of this date for airplane applicants. i Foreword The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document to communicate the aeronautical knowledge, risk management, and flight proficiency standards for the instrument rating in the airplane category, single-engine land and sea; and multiengine land and sea classes. This ACS incorporates and supersedes FAA-S-ACS-8A Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards. The FAA views the ACS as the foundation of its transition to a more integrated and systematic approach to airman certification. The ACS is part of the Safety Management System (SMS) framework that the FAA uses to mitigate risks associated with airman certification training and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)
    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment H Airport Emissions Inventories for Houston-Galveston
    ATTACHMENT H AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON- GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 FINAL Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. April 21, 2015 ERG No. 0345.00.002 AIRPORT EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON- BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51606-03-FY2015-08 Prepared for: Anusuya Iyer Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 341S Austin, TX Prepared by: Roger Chang Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 April 21, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1 Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Report Organization................................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UFC 3-260-04 Airfield and Heliport Marking
    UFC 3-260-04 16 May 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) AIRFIELD AND HELIPORT MARKING APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-260-04 16 May 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) AIRFIELD AND HELIPORT MARKING Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER (Preparing Activity) Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location This UFC supersedes Air Force ETL 04-2, Standard Airfield Pavement Marking Schemes, 19 July 2004; Army TM 5-823-4 C1, Marking of Army Airfield-Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, July 1987; UFC 3-260-05A, Marking of Army Airfield Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, 16 January 2004; Army Engineering and Construction Bulletin, Marking of Army Airfields and Heliports, 1 October 2012; and Army ETL 1110-3-512, Army Airfield and Heliport Markings, 30 September 2015. UFC 3-260-04 16 May 2018 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and, in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Acronyms
    Aviation Acronyms 5010 AIRPORT MASTER RECORD (FAA FORM 5010-1) 7460-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 7480-1 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL 99'S NINETY-NINES (WOMEN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION) A/C AIRCRAFT A/DACG ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIRFIELD CONTROL GROUP A/FD AIRPORT/FACILITY DIRECTORY A/G AIR - TO - GROUND A/G AIR/GROUND AAA AUTOMATED AIRLIFT ANALYSIS AAAE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAC MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AAI ARRIVAL AIRCRAFT INTERVAL AAIA AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT AALPS AUTOMATED AIR LOAD PLANNING SYSTEM AANI AIR AMBULANCE NETWORK AAPA ASSOCIATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC AIRLINES AAR AIRPORT ACCEPTANCE RATE AAS ADVANCED AUTOMATION SYSTEM AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER AC AIRFRAME CHANGE AC AIRCRAFT AC AIR CONTROLLER AC ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACAA AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT ACAA AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ACAIS AIR CARRIER ACTIVITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER ACC AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL ACC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER ACC AIR CENTER COMMANDER ACCC AREA CONTROL COMPUTER COMPLEX ACDA APPROACH CONTROL DESCENT AREA ACDO AIR CARRIER DISTRICT OFFICE ACE AVIATION CAREER EDUCATION ACE CENTRAL REGION OF FAA ACF AREA CONTROL FACILITY ACFT AIRCRAFT ACI-NA AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA ACID AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION ACIP AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING ACLS AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ACLT ACTUAL CALCULATED LANDING TIME Page 2 ACMI AIRCRAFT, CREW, MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE (cargo) ACOE U.S. ARMY
    [Show full text]
  • Key West International Airport Ad-Hoc Committee on Airport Noise
    Key West International Airport Ad-Hoc Committee on Airport Noise Agenda for Tuesday, June 4th, 2019 Call to Order 2:00 pm Harvey Government Center Roll Call A. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes 1. For March 5th, 2019 B. Discussion of NIP Implementation 1. Status of Construction of Building B, Floors 3-6 (34 units) 2. Final Bid Document Preparation & Bidding of KWBTS Building C C. Other Reports: 1. Noise Hotline and Contact Log 2. Airport Noise Reports D. Other Discussion ADA ASSISTANCE: If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., no later than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". 1 KWIA Ad-Hoc Committee on Noise March 5th, 2019 Meeting Minutes Meeting called to order by Commissioner Dany Kolhage at 2:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Committee Members in Attendance: Commissioner Danny Kolhage Peter Horton Nat Harris Marlene Durazo Harvey Wolney Nick Pontecorvo Norma Faraldo Andrea Haynes Staff and Guests in Attendance: Thomas J. Henderson, Monroe County Assistant Director of Airports Deborah Lagos, DML & Associates Steve Vecchi, THC Heather Faubert, THC Sharon Van Hove, Community Eric Van Hove, Community A quorum was present. Commissioner Dany Kolhage chaired the meeting. Review and Approval of Meeting Minutes for the October 2nd, 2018 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Commissioner Dany Kolhage asked if there were any comments or corrections to the minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Emissions Inventory for Texas Statewide 2014 Aerr Inventory and 2008 Through 2040 Trend Analysis Years
    APPENDIX F AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR TEXAS STATEWIDE 2014 AERR INVENTORY AND 2008 THROUGH 2040 TREND ANALYSIS YEARS Dallas-Fort Worth Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan State Implementation Plan Revision for the One-Hour and 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards Project Number 2018-028-SIP-NR Aircraft Emissions Inventory for Texas Statewide 2014 AERR Inventory and 2008 to 2040 Trend Analysis Years Final-Revised Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. Completion Date: July 31, 2015 Revision Date: May 16, 2016 ERG No. 0345.00.002 AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR TEXAS STATEWIDE 2014 AERR INVENTORY AND 2008 – 2040 TREND ANALYSIS YEARS TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51606-03-FY2015-08 Prepared for: Anusuya Iyer Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 341S Austin, TX Prepared by: Roger Chang Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 Completion Date: July 31, 2015 Revision Date: May 16, 20161 1. Explanation of revisions are summarized in section 2.1 Revisions Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Revisions ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 200403-2004 Robinson R44 Raven II.Pdf
    I Small changes, big performance Since I had never flown a Raven II, Robinson Helicopter's Chief Produc• tion Test Pilot Doug Tompkins gave me a quick "differences" lesson. The only operational change is in the start pro• cedure. The keyed magneto switch is no longer used to engage the starter and has a new position marked Prime. After turning the master battery switch on and pushing the mixture control full rich, the engine is ready for priming. To prime, hold the key switch in the spring-loaded Prime position for 3 to 5 seconds and note that the auxiliary fuel pump light goes out. Next place the magneto switch in the Both position, pull the mixture all the way out. and press the starter button located at the end of the collective. As the engine be• gins to fire, smoothly push the mixture to full rich. Tompkins also pointed out the lack of a carburetor heat control. He noted that eliminating carburetor-icing prob• lems is an added safety benefit of the fuel injection. After flying to Catalina Island to take some photos, we departed Torrance, California's Zamperini Field for Las Vegas. I handled the navigation and ATC through the Los Angeles Basin so Zent• graf could focus on getting comfortable at the controls. I took advantage of the dual Garmin GNS 430 GPS/nav/com re• ceivers to thread our way through the Class B airspace. What I like about this arrangement is the ability to set one 430 on a one- or two- mile scale, allowing you to see airspace boundaries and terrain features, like highways and rivers, in de• tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Military Aircraft
    Hazard Military aircraft Developed and maintained by the NFCC Contents Hazard - Military aircraft ........................................................................................................................... 3 Control measure - Cordon controls: Military aircraft .................................................................... 7 Control measure - Specialist advice: Military aircraft .................................................................... 8 Control measure - Restrict radio transmissions .............................................................................. 9 Control measure - Access the cockpit .............................................................................................. 10 Control measure - Make ejection seats safe .................................................................................. 11 Control measure - Extricate the aircrew ......................................................................................... 12 This content is only valid at the time of download - 25-09-2021 10:14 2 of 14 Hazard - Military aircraft Hazard Knowledge Fire and rescue services may come into contact with military aircraft of varying types and roles, from a number of different nations. These aircraft operate from military aerodromes around the country, or overseas and in transit through UK air space, but may also operate from civil aerodromes for a variety of reasons. Military organisations operate many types of aircraft that can vary enormously, from small two-seat trainers, attack helicopters,
    [Show full text]