DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2016 CHAPTER V1 FOLLOW-UP ON RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE IACHR IN ITS COUNTRY AND THEMATIC REPORTS FOLLOW-UP ON RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE IACHR IN THE REPORT TRUTH, JUSTICE AND REPARATION: FOURTH REPORT ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN COLOMBIA I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the IACHR” or “the Commission”) has paid special attention to the human rights situation in Colombia during the armed conflict and, considering its devastating consequences, has ascribed great value to the signing of the peace accords, which usher in new possibilities for strengthening the protection of human rights. The objective of this chapter is to follow up on the recommendations made in the report Truth, Justice and Reparation: Fourth Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (hereinafter also “the report Truth, Justice and Reparation” or “the Report of the IACHR”), approved by the Commission on December 31, 2013. In December 2012, the IACHR made an onsite visit to Colombia and subsequently prepared the country report that is the subject of this follow-up; the Report was published in August 2014. 2. In Chapter V of its 2014 and 2015 annual reports the Commission followed up on the recommendations made by the IACHR in its Report. The Commission has considered that the State’s recognition that the recommendations of the report are generally aimed at offering “tools for overcoming the challenges for guaranteeing and protecting human rights” and that their “implementation will represent a positive change for the holders of rights” reflects the commitment taken on by the State to effectively address the problems and challenges identified, this being a necessary element for going forwarded decidedly in implementing the protections and guarantees required for the victims of human rights violations in Colombia.2 3. In addition, the IACHR recognizes what was noted by the State when it indicates that “there are innumerable obstacles and challenges to overcome,” but that “the Government of Colombia, as part of an unbending policy of the State will continue to redouble efforts to guarantee the human rights of all inhabitants of the national territory…,” as well as its openness to the commitment of the IACHR to continue working with the State to seek solutions.3 The State also noted the importance of the report of the Commission in seeking to achieve a “positive transformation” on the situation of human rights in Colombia, in particular the recognition of fundamental issues such as the “peace talks,”4 which ultimately concluded in the peace agreement. 1 In keeping with Article 17(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure, Commissioner Enrique Gil Botero, of Colombian nationality, did not participate in the deliberations or decision on this chapter. 2 IACHR, Chapter V Follow-up of recommendations issued by the IACHR in the Report Truth, Justice and Reparation, May 7, 2015, para. 2. 3 Republic of Colombia. Avances en la protección y garantía de los derechos humanos en Colombia (2013-2014) y seguimiento a las recomendaciones del IV Informe País de la IACHR: “Verdad, Justicia y Reparación.” Note S-GAIID-14-094783, received December 29, 2014, pp. 4-5. IACHR. 2014 Annual Report. IACHR, Chapter V Follow-up of recommendations issued by the IACHR in the Report Truth, Justice and Reparation, May 7, 2015, para. 2. 4 Republic of Colombia. Avances en la protección y garantía de los derechos humanos en Colombia (2013-2014) y seguimiento a las recomendaciones del IV Informe País de la IACHR: “Verdad, Justicia y Reparación.” Note S-GAIID-14-094783, received December 29, 2014, p. 5. IACHR, 2014 Annual Report. IACHR, Chapter V - Follow-up of recommendations issued by the IACHR in the Report Truth, Justice and Reparation, May 7, 2015, para. 2. 4. In this chapter the Commission recognizes the efforts made by the State to persevere to the signing of the peace agreement, initially signed August 24, 2016, and the subsequent renegotiation in light of the proposals put forth by the groups that had questioned the agreement and that called on voters to reject it in the referendum held October 2, 2016.5 The Commission looked favorably upon the renegotiation going forward while respecting the effective pluralism needed in a democratic society, and likewise when a Final Agreement was reached to end the conflict with the FARC-EP (hereinafter “Final Agreement”) on November 12, 2016.6 5. In November 2016 the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States (OAS) adopted by acclamation a resolution supporting the peace process and the end of the armed conflict in Colombia.7 After that session Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos met with the President of the IACHR, Commissioner James Cavallaro, and delivered the Agreement to him. Both authorities engaged in a dialogue on the peace process, the precarious state of the ceasefire, and implementation of the Agreement. The Commission expressed to Colombia its commitment to continue monitoring to ensure that the implementation of the agreement goes forward respecting and upholding inter-American human rights standards.8 6. In this regard the Commission reiterates that it maintains its conviction that consolidating peace is an essential requirement for the exercise of and respect for human rights. In addition, it takes into account the great challenge and responsibility that Colombia has ahead of it in implementing the agreement. In this understanding, the IACHR also maintains its commitment to attain peace in Colombia, thus it will continue offering its collaboration to the State and Colombian society as a whole in this effort, and it will monitoring implementation of the Agreement within the scope of its competences with the aim of such implementation meeting inter-American standards in relation to truth, justice, and reparations in the transition to peace.9 7. In its report Truth, Justice and Reparation, and its follow-up reports, the Commission has analyzed the human rights situation in Colombia mindful in particular of the context of the continuation of the internal armed conflict and the impact it has had on the protection and exercise of rights. Through the IACHR’s constant monitoring of the human rights situation in Colombia it has found that due to the internal armed conflict, Colombia maintains particular complexities stemming from the violence, complexities that continue to be a part of the day-to-day lives of its inhabitants, and that hit the most vulnerable sectors of the population. At the same time, the IACHR has recognized and valued the important public policies furthered by the State in the area of human rights to address this complex reality and the impetus the Government has given to attending to the victims of human rights violations and protecting persons at risk, as well as the significant investment in human and financial resources in these areas.10 This year it once again recognizes that effort by the State. 8. This analysis by the Commission has also taken into account that the Colombian armed conflict has undergone major transformations in terms of the dynamics and actors involved, in particular 5 IACHR. Press Release No. 122/16, IACHR Welcomes the Signing of Agreement for the Construction of Peace in Colombia, August 29, 2016. 6 See IACHR, Press Release No. 178/16, IACHR Reaffirms its Support for the Peace Process in Colombia and Is Monitoring Compliance with Inter-American Standards, December 1, 2016. 7 Organization of American States (OAS), CP/DEC. 67 (2096/16) Support for the peace process and the termination of the armed conflict in Colombia, November 18, 2016. 8 IACHR, Press Release No. 178/16, IACHR Reaffirms its Support for the Peace Process in Colombia and Is Monitoring Compliance with Inter-American Standards, December 1, 2016. 9 See IACHR, Press Release No. 178/16, IACHR Reaffirms its Support for the Peace Process in Colombia and Is Monitoring Compliance with Inter-American Standards, December 1, 2016. 10 See IACHR, 2015 Annual Report 2015, Chapter V Follow-up of recommendations issued by the IACHR in the Report Truth, Justice and Reparation, March 17, 2016, para. 14. 676 since the demobilization of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) and in recent years with the progress of the peace process and the cease fire; and this year in particular with the subsequent signing of the Final Agreement and the efforts already made to implement it. 9. The Final Agreement was approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Colombian Congress on November 29 and 30, 2016, respectively, with all votes in favor. Subsequently the Constitutional Court approved the mechanism that allows for fast-track treatment for adopting the statutes and the constitutional amendments needed for its implementation.11 In its observations on the draft of this report12 the State reported the approval of Law 1820 of December 30, 2016, “issuing provisions on amnesty, pardon, and special criminal justice treatment and other provisions,” aimed at regulating amnesties and pardons for political and related offenses and adopting special differentiated criminal justice procedures, especially for state agents who have been convicted, prosecuted, or accused of committing punishable conduct by reason of, on occasion of, or directly or indirectly related to the armed conflict.13 The State reported that with a view to implementing that Law, the President of the Republic issued Decree 277 of 2017 on February 17, 2017 “Establishing the procedure for the effective implementation of Law 1820 of December 30, 2016.”14 This report will set forth some considerations on the agreement under the section on transitional justice (see infra D). 10. On November 16, 2016, the Commission communicated to the State that it anticipated publishing a third follow-up report on the recommendations that were made in the report Truth, Justice and Reparation, in which it decided to place emphasis on the recommendations that are the main subject of this chapter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Informe 2013 Bacrim
    Las BACRIM despue s de 2013: ¿prono stico reservado? BERNARDO PÉREZ SALAZAR CARLOS MONTOYA CELY A mediados de 2012, el ministro de defensa, Juan Carlos Pinzón, dio un parte de tranquilidad frente a las bandas criminales –bacrim–, señalando que en 934 municipios del país “no hay presencia de bandas criminales”.1 No aclaró el alcance de la expresión “no hay presencia” ni la definición de “banda criminal”. Tampoco refirió cómo llegó a la mentada cifra de municipios. En todo caso la declaración contrastó visiblemente con el parte que a principios del 2011 habían entregado las autoridades de la Policía Nacional, con el general Oscar Naranjo a la cabeza, al indicar que las vendettas y los ajustes de cuentas entre narcos representarían el 47% de los 15.400 homicidios registrados en 2010. Dadas las violentas disputas territoriales que se registraban en aquel entonces por el control del “microtráfico” en sectores urbanos de Medellín entre alias “Sebastián” y “Valenciano”, así como por rutas de narcotráfico en Córdoba entre “Paisas” (aliados a los Rastrojos) y “Aguilas Negras“ (aliados de los Urabeños), no es de extrañar que una nota informativa cubriendo la noticia se hubiese titulado: “Las bacrim cometen la mitad de los asesinatos en Colombia”.2 Declaraciones sobre el tema del entonces ministro del Interior, Germán Vargas Lleras, entregadas también en enero de 2011, no fueron menos inquietantes, y se resumieron en el titular “Las bacrim ya actúan en 24 departamentos colombianos”, lo que propició que algunos analistas refirieran la presencia de
    [Show full text]
  • Lost in the Definition Environmental Displacement in Salgar, Colombia Laura Gamez
    Lost in the definition Environmental displacement in Salgar, Colombia Laura Gamez Lost in the Definition: Environmental Displacement in Salgar, Colombia n the early hours of the morning in the municipality of Salgar, Colombia, Ion 18 May 2015, heavy rainfall and flooding resulted in a landslide that marked one of the country’s deadliest single-environmental disasters since 1999. In the immediate aftermath it was reported that the landslide in Salgar had left more than 93 people dead and 300 to 7821 people displaced (“Falsa alarma sobre nueva avalancha causó pánico en Salgar, Antioquia,” 2015). The event was not only a shock in terms of the loss of life, but reignited fierce debate about appropriate humanitarian response, legal challenges of land rights, and more importantly how to suitably address displacement caused by environmental disasters. Colombia, after all, is a country that often faces environmental challenges in part because of its topography and climate, as well as high disaster risks due to settlements in environmentally vulnerable zones. Furthermore, as of 2014, Colombia has one of the highest levels of forced migration and internal displacement in the world (second only to Syria) due to political violence and strife (COHA, 2015). Howe- ver in Colombia, policies and responses to environmental migration have varied over the years. In light of the country’s civil strife, a policy narra- tive has emerged whereby environmental induced-displacement is seen as a temporary and often short-term effect that is not necessarily addressed in the same way as conflict-induced displacement. Noting the events that took place, the humanitarian response, the policy narrative, and the legal challenges regarding return, the case of Salgar provides interesting insight into how a government with experience in forced migration addresses a different type of migration—environmentally induced displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Convocatoria Doctv Colombia.Pdf
    C O L O M B I A Contenido Presentación 5 I Información general 7 1. Invitación a concursar 7 2. Objetivos generales 7 3. Objetivos específicos 7 4. Cronograma 8 5. Recursos de la Convocatoria 8 6. Condiciones de la convocatoria 8 7. Zona de cubrimiento de los concursos regionales 10 8. Quiénes pueden participar 10 9. Quiénes no pueden participar 10 10. Requisitos formales para participar 11 11. Consulta de los términos de la convocatoria 12 II Envío de proyectos, etapas de evaluación y selección 13 1. Envío de proyectos 13 2. Los Comités Evaluadores 14 3. Criterios de evaluación 14 4. Etapas de evaluación 14 4 5. De la declaratoria de desierto 16 6. Causales de rechazo de proyectos 16 III Disposiciones generales 17 1. Compromisos de los ganadores de los concursos. 17 2. Condiciones generales del contrato de coproducción 18 3. Definiciones, denominaciones y entendimiento de los términos utilizados en la presente convocatoria. 23 IV Anexos 25 Anexo 1 26 Anexo 2 27 Anexo 3 28 Anexo 4 29 Anexo 5 30 Presentación “Un país sin documentales es como una familia sin álbum de fotos” Patricio Guzmán Cuando en el año 2005 el Ministerio de Cultura y la Comisión Nacional de Televisión se unieron para organizar en nuestro país el Primer Programa de Fomento a la Producción y Teledifusión del Documental Iberoamericano –DOCTV IB–, eran conscientes del reto que significaba poner en marcha un programa de fomento al documental iberoamericano con una única metodología para 13 países que comparten idioma, cultura, y problemas, pero cuyas narrativas y estilos audiovisuales no resultan similares.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Vol 5, No.1
    PRISM VOL. 5, NO. 1 2014 A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM About VOL. 5, NO. 1 2014 PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex EDITOR and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; relevant policy Michael Miklaucic and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS Ross Clark Ben Graves Caliegh Hernandez Communications Daniel Moore Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct communications to: COPY EDITORS Dale Erickson Editor, PRISM Rebecca Harper 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Christoff Luehrs Fort Lesley J. McNair Sara Thannhauser Washington, DC 20319 Nathan White Telephone: (202) 685-3442 DESIGN DIRecTOR FAX: Carib Mendez (202) 685-3581 Email: [email protected] ADVISORY BOARD Dr. Gordon Adams Dr. Pauline H. Baker Ambassador Rick Barton Contributions Professor Alain Bauer PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States and Ambassador James F. Dobbins abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to [email protected] Ambassador John E. Herbst (ex officio) with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Dr. David Kilcullen Ambassador Jacques Paul Klein Dr. Roger B. Myerson This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Moisés Naím Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted MG William L.
    [Show full text]
  • FARC During the Peace Process by Mark Wilson
    PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2020 FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES National Defense University Cover photo caption: FARC leaders Iván Márquez (center) along with Jesús Santrich (wearing sunglasses) announce in August 2019 that they are abandoning the 2016 Peace Accords with the Colombian government and taking up arms again with other dissident factions. Photo credit: Dialogo Magazine, YouTube, and AFP. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not an official policy nor position of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense nor the U.S. Government. About the author: Mark is a postgraduate candidate in the MSc Conflict Studies program at the London School of Economics. He is a former William J. Perry Center intern, and the current editor of the London Conflict Review. His research interests include illicit networks as well as insurgent conflict in Colombia specifically and South America more broadly. Editor-in-Chief: Pat Paterson Layout Design: Viviana Edwards FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2020 FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson Introduction The 2016 Colombian Peace Deal marked the end of FARC’s formal military campaign. As a part of the demobilization process, 13,000 former militants surrendered their arms and returned to civilian life either in reintegration camps or among the general public.1 The organization’s leadership were granted immunity from extradition for their conduct during the internal armed conflict and some took the five Senate seats and five House of Representatives seats guaranteed by the peace deal.2 As an organiza- tion, FARC announced its transformation into a political party, the Fuerza Alternativa Revolucionaria del Común (FARC).
    [Show full text]
  • Informe De Evaluación Convocatoria Regional N°2 De 2019
    INFORME DE EVALUACIÓN CONVOCATORIA REGIONAL N°2 DE 2019 EVALUACION CONVOCATORIA REGIONAL No 2 DE 2019 - LA HISTORIA NO CONTADA DE LA INDEPENDENCIA EXPERIENCIA APOYO A LA APOYO A LA PROPUESTA PROPUESTA EQUIPO INDUSTRIA INDUSTRIA PROPONENTE OPERATIVA (200 CREATIVA TOTAL TRABAJO (150 NACIONAL REGIONAL (100 ptos) (450 ptos) ptos) (100 ptos) ptos) CORPORACION LUMEN 2000 COLOMBIA 125 414 30 100 0 669 WSC TELEVISION 35 245 60 100 0 440 MR COMUNICACIONES SAS 40 203 20 100 0 363 CABEZA RODANTE PRODUCCIONES SA 120 330 130 100 50 730 MAVECOL COMUNICACIONES LTDA 70 187 130 100 50 537 PRIME PRODUCCIONES SA 150 449 70 100 0 769 INFORME DE EVALUACIÓN CONVOCATORIA REGIONAL N°2 DE 2019 4.3.1 DOCUMENTOS DE VERIFICACIÓN DE REQUISITOS TÉCNICOS (HABILITANTE) 4.3.1. RELACIÓN DE EXPERIENCIA O CONTRATOS EJECUTADOS NOMBRE Y TIPO PROYECTO AL QUE DOCUMENTACION FOLIOS- NOMBRE DEL NOMBRE DEL SUSCRIPCION DE CUMPLIMIENTO DE No. ANEXO 5 No. Cert OBJETO DEL CONTRATO VALOR DEL CONTRATO PLAZO OBSERVACIONES SUMA VALORES RESULTADO DE PROPONENTE SE PRESENTA ENTREGADA CERTIFICAICONES CONTRATANTE CONTRATISTA CONTRATO FIRMA DEL SOPORTE Preproduccion,produccion y posproduccion CORPORACION CORPORACION LUMEN de la serie de ficcion web EL REBUSQUE 3 meses y 14 Director General 58(Original) 1 UNIVERSITARIA $ 30.000.000 5 de febrero 2018 2000 COLOMBIA temporadas 1 y 2 de 2 y 3 capitulos con una dias Administrativo MINUTO DE DIOS duracion de 24 minutos. Realizar bajo la modalidad de produccion por encargo la prerproduccion, produccion CORPORACION LUMEN 26/01/2018- Jefe Oficina Asesora
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevos Escenarios De Conflicto Armado Y Violencia
    NORORIENTE Y MAGDALENA MEDIO, LLANOS ORIENTALES, SUROCCIDENTE Y BOGOTÁ DC NUEVOS ESCENARIOS DE CONFLICTO ARMADO Y VIOLENCIA Panorama posacuerdos con AUC Nororiente y Magdalena Medio, Llanos Orientales, Félix Tomás Bata Jiménez Suroccidente y Bogotá DC Blanca Berta Rodríguez Peña NUEVOS ESCENARIOS DE CONFLICTO ARMADO Y VIOLENCIA Representantes de organizaciones de víctimas Panorama posacuerdos con AUC CENTRO NACIONAL DE MEMORIA HISTÓRICA Director General Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica Gonzalo Sánchez Gómez Gonzalo Sánchez Gómez Director General Coordinador de la investigación y edición Asesores de Dirección Álvaro Villarraga Sarmiento María Emma Wills Obregón, Patricia Linares Prieto, Paula Andrea Ila, Andrés Fernando Suárez, Luz Amanda Granados Urrea, Doris Yolanda Asistente de Coordinación Ramos Vega, César Augusto Rincón Vicentes Sandra Marcela Flórez Directores Técnicos Investigadores e Investigadoras Alberto Santos Peñuela, Lukas Rodríguez Lizcano, Luisa Fernanda Álvaro Villarraga Sarmiento Hernández Mercado y Juanita Esguerra Rezk Dirección Acuerdos de la Verdad Comité de Lectores /Lectoras del CNMH Martha Angélica Barrantes Reyes Nororiente: Vladimir Caraballo, investigador CNMH-DAV Dirección para la Construcción de la Memoria Histórica Llanos Orientales: Bernardo Pérez, investigador, Fundación Paz y Reconciliación Ana Margoth Guerrero de Otero Suroccidente: Adolfo Atehortúa. Doctor en Sociología EHESS París, Dirección de Archivos de Derechos Humanos Francia. Profesor UPN Bogotá DC: Oscar David Andrade Becerra. Asesor Cualitativo
    [Show full text]
  • Satelite Nss 806
    SATELITE NSS 806 Polarización: Circular izquierda Canal Frecuencia SR FEC Modo Definición Modulación Servicio 4009 19200 2/3 DVB-S2 8PSK Record Record HD HD 210 Record News SD 510 4027 9600 2/3 DVB-S2 8PSK Record Record HD HD 273 Record nacional SD 641 4178 30000 2/3 DVB-S2 8PSK Rey de Salem HD 311 NASA TV UHD SD 831 Fashionone 4k 911 SATELITE NSS 805 Polarización: Circular horizontal Canal Frecuencia SR FEC Modo Definición Modulación Servicio ATV sur 3747 1600 3/5 DVB-S2 SD QPSK AngelTV Am. 3872 9333 3/5 DVB-S2 SD 8PSK 3910 5832 5/6 DVB-S2 QPSK TVCi SD 631 TV Mundial SD 273 TV Mundial SD 611 TV Mundial SD 711 Guatemalan 4084 10560 3/5 DVB-S2 8PSK mux Fiesta 103.7 FM SD 631 Radio Ranchera SD 273 Tropicálida SD 611 Galaxia La Picosa SD 711 Alfa SD Sonora es la Noticia SD Repretel 4111 4000 3/5 DVB-S2 8PSK Monumental SD Z FM SD Momentos Reloj SD Radio Disney 101.1 SD La Mejor FM Costa Rica SD Ponte Exa FM SD Latina 4142 5000 3/4 DVB-S2 8PSK Latina SD 49 Edupol 3 SD 301 Edupol 4 SD 401 Polarización: Circular vertical Canal Frecuencia SR FEC Modo Definición Modulación Servicio Maranata 4093 3617 DVB-S RTP 4101 2320 8/9 DVB-S2 QPSK Internacional RDP Internacional SD America SATELITE SES 6 Polarización: Circular izquierda Canal Frecuencia SR FEC Modo Definición Modulación Servicio AgroBrasil TV 3627 2787 3/5 DVB-S2 SD 8 PSK Canal 21 3630 2222 3/4 DVB-S SD TV nazaré 3644 2532 3/4 DVB-S SD TV grande rio 3652 4000 5/6 DVB-S SD WOBI 3682 3030 5/6 DVB-S SD 8PSK 3803 27500 7/8 DVB-S Cubavisión internacional SD 105 RT America SD 1425 Globecast RT
    [Show full text]
  • INFORME SOBRE PRESENCIA DE GRUPOS ARMADOS EN COLOMBIA Actualizacion 2018-2 Y 2019
    INFORME SOBRE PRESENCIA DE GRUPOS ARMADOS EN COLOMBIA Actualizacion 2018-2 y 2019 1 INFORME SOBRE PRESENCIA DE GRUPOS ARMADOS EN COLOMBIA Camilo González Posso presidente de indepaz y coordinador DE la investigacION Juana Valentina Cabezas Palacios Leonardo González Perafán InvestigacIOn Carlos Eduardo Espitia Cueca Mapas Agosto 2020 * El contenido de este informe es responsabilidad de sus autores. SIGLAS Y ABREVIATURAS AGC: Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia ASCAMCAT: Asociación Campesina del Catatumbo ASCN: Autodefensas Conquistadoras De La Sierra Nevada AUC: Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia BACRIM: Bandas Criminales BVPA: Frente Virgilio Peralta Arenas CINEP: Centro de Investigación y Educación Popular COCCAM: Coordinadora Nacional de Cultivadores de Coca, Amapola y Marihuana DEA: Administración para el Control de Drogas DIH: Derecho Internacional Humanitario ELN: Ejército de Liberación Nacional EPL: Ejército Popular de Liberación ERPAC: Ejército Popular Antisubversivo de Colombia ETCR: Espacio Territorial de Capacitación y Reincorporación FARC-EP: Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia- Ejército del Pueblo FIP: Fundacion Ideas para la Paz FOS: Frente Oliver Sinisterra FUP: Fuerzas Unidas del Pacífico GAD: Grupos Armados Delincuenciales GAO: Grupos armados Organizados GAOr: Grupos Armados Organizados Residuales GSNM: Grupos de Seguridad del Narcotráfico y Mafias GUP: Guerrillas Unidas del Pacífico INPEC: Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Carcelario LDNP: Libertadores del Nordeste Presente MRC: Movimiento Revolucionario Campesino ONU: Organización de Naciones Unidas OVA: Oficina del Valle de Aburrá PCC: Primer Comando Capital PNIS: Programa Nacional Integral de Sustitución de Cultivos RNI: Rearmados para Negocios Ilegales SAT: Sistemas de Alertas Tempranas UNP: Unidad Nacional de Protección TABLA DE CONTENIDO pg. 7 Presentación pg. 7 Metodología 1. pg. 9 Contextualización del Riesgo pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A Soy Capaz
    Q & A Índice ¿Qué es Soy Capaz? 3 Soy Capaz es una iniciativa que se construye sobre varios niveles: 4 / 5 ¿Cómo empezó Soy Capaz? 6 / 7 ¿Quién hace parte de Soy Capaz? 8 / 9 ¿Cuando comienza Soy Capaz? 10 Cinco pasos por la paz 11 ¿Qué pasará después? 12 ¿Qué es Soy Capaz? Soy Capaz es una campaña que busca dar un ejemplo a la sociedad para que todos los colombianos y colombianas asuman su responsabilidad en transformar el país aportándole a la construcción de paz como un derecho fundamental universal y no como una estrategia política. Soy Capaz es liderada por el sector privado que trabaja, no como competidores entre sí, sino como aliados a través de la Asociación Nacional de Industriales (ANDI) para enviar un mensaje de cambio a los colombianos. Más de 120 empresas se unen con un sólo propósito: Inspirar con su ejemplo a 46 millones de colombianos. 3 Soy Capaz es una iniciativa que se construye sobre varios niveles. 1. Los principales artículos de consumo masivo del país 3. Se desarrollaron talleres de construcción de paz para (más de 180 marcas) darán un mensaje unificado al los empleados de las empresas vinculadas a la cambiar sus empaques y vestirse todos de blanco. Cada campaña, con el objetivo de formar más de 500.000 marca se apropia a su manera del mensaje de Soy Capaz embajadores de un mensaje que permita dar inicio a la creando su propia frase que las identifica. Por ejemplo: transformación del país. Soy capaz de creer, Soy Capaz de escuchar a los demás, Soy Capaz de conectarme contigo, entre muchas otras.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporacion Universitaria Minuto De Dios
    CORPORACION UNIVERSITARIA MINUTO DE DIOS PROGRAMA DE TRABAJO SOCIAL SISTEMATIZACIÓN DE LA EXPERIENCIA “PROMOCIÓN DE LA RESILIENCIA EN NIÑOS Y NIÑAS VÍCTIMAS DEL CONFLICTO ARMADO: APORTES DESDE LAS COMUNIDADES DE DIÁLOGO”, EN EL BARRIO EL OASIS, MUNICIPIO DE SOACHA. TRABAJO DE GRADO PARA OPTAR TÍTULO DE: TRABAJADORAS SOCIALES PRESENTAN: PAOLA ANDREA GUATAVA MEJÍA ID: 449467 STEFFANY DEL CARMEN VICTORIA PALACIOS ID: 453804 TUTORA: LUDIN RODRÍGUEZ BOGOTÁ D.C, COLOMBIA MAYO DE 2019 Índice Introducción ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. Capítulo 1. Justificación......................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Experiencia de intervención a sistematizar ..................................................................... 7 1.2. Diagnóstico de la problemática .................................................................................... 16 1.3. Objetivos ....................................................................................................................... 22 1.3.1. Objetivo General .................................................................................................... 22 1.3.2. Objetivos Específicos ............................................................................................. 22 1.4. Marcos de referencia ..................................................................................................... 23 1.4.1. Marco contextual
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: COLOMBIA Mapping Digital Media: Colombia
    COUNTRY REPORT MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: COLOMBIA Mapping Digital Media: Colombia A REPORT BY THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS WRITTEN BY Jimena Zuluaga and María Paula Martínez (lead reporters) EDITED BY Marius Dragomir and Mark Thompson (Open Society Media Program editors) Fernando Bermejo (regional editor) EDITORIAL COMMISSION Yuen-Ying Chan, Christian S. Nissen, Dusˇan Reljic´, Russell Southwood, Michael Starks, Damian Tambini The Editorial Commission is an advisory body. Its members are not responsible for the information or assessments contained in the Mapping Digital Media texts OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM TEAM Meijinder Kaur, program assistant; Morris Lipson, senior legal advisor; and Gordana Jankovic, director OPEN SOCIETY INFORMATION PROGRAM TEAM Vera Franz, senior program manager; Darius Cuplinskas, director 14 August 2012 Contents Mapping Digital Media ..................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 Context ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Social Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 10 Economic Indicators ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]