DOCSLIB.ORG

Botany Bay 132Kv Electricity Cable Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botany Bay 132Kv Electricity Cable Project Botany Bay 132kV Electricity Cable Project Cultural Heritage Assessment November 2006 Navin Officer heritage consultants Pty Ltd acn: 092 901 605 Number 4 Kingston Warehouse 71 Leichhardt St. Kingston ACT 2604 ph 02 6282 9415 fx 02 6282 9416 A Report to Molino Stewart Pty Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project During the next decade EnergyAustralia must replace ageing infrastructure in the Sydney CBD and the inner metropolitan area. It has been identified that replacement of two existing high voltage feeders which currently connect EnergyAustralia’s Bunnerong subtransmission substation (“STS”) at Matraville with its Canterbury STS at Earlwood, must be achieved by late 2008. The preferred replacement for the feeders, known as Feeders 908 and 909, however, is a new connection between Bunnerong and Kurnell across Botany Bay. It is proposed that the new feeders would take the following route: • from Bunnerong STS, following the road alignments to La Perouse (3.2km); • under the National Park at La Perouse by way of horizontal directional drilling (0.5km); • across Botany Bay by way of submarine cable to a section of Silver Beach situated outside (but next to) the National Park at Kurnell (2.2km); and • from Silver Beach to Kurnell STS, following the road alignments (1.5km). At Bunnerong STS, little work is proposed other than the laying of the cables within the site and connecting them to new terminations and existing equipment/apparatus. The new connections would provide an opportunity to upgrade Kurnell STS so that supplies to the Kurnell Peninsula are more secure, as well as facilitating the additional power into the CBD and inner metropolitan area. The proposed works at the Kurnell STS comprise: • Replacement of the ageing outdoor high voltage switch gear with a building to house the Gas Insulated Switchgear and Control and Protection equipment to which the new cables would be connected. • Three new transformers in new transformer bays. • An underground retention system which would capture any oil spilled in the unlikely event of rupture of a transformer. The Project will be known as the ‘Botany Bay Cable Project’. This project will be assessed under Part 3A of the Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and this study will form part of the Environmental Assessment of the project. Previously recordings One previously recorded Aboriginal site is located within the Kurnell section of the study area; this site was not able to be located during the current study and appears that it may have been destroyed or covered during the construction of the Kurnell STS. Thirteen previously recorded Aboriginal sites and one potential archaeological deposit (PAD 1 on the eastern side of Little Bay Road) are located in the general vicinity of the La Perouse section of the study area. The sites include art sites and middens. Aboriginal burials have also been recorded in the vicinity of both the Kurnell and La Perouse sections of the study area. None of these recorded sites or the PAD will be directly impacted by the 132kV cable project. There are 23 recorded European heritage items in the vicinity of the study area. Two of these sites, Prince Charles Parade and Captain Cook Drive, will be directly impacted by the installation of the new electricity cable as the cable will be installed in the road reserves of these roads. The impact on the heritage significance of these items is considered to be minor. The Nationally Heritage Listed Kurnell Peninsula will not be affected by the current proposal. Recordings resulting from this study One Aboriginal PAD, K PAD 1 at Kurnell, was identified during the field survey of the study area. This area will be impacted by the project. Two European historic sites, LaPH1 (‘First Fleet Marine’ Restaurant and Boatshed Building, La Perouse) and KH1 (St John Fisher Catholic Church, Kurnell), were identified during the field survey of the study area. Both are assessed as having low local significance, and neither will be directly impacted by the project. Recommendations It is recommended that: Under the current proposal K PAD 1 will be impacted by the project. Archaeological subsurface investigation of the area should be undertaken to determine the nature, extent and integrity of any potential archaeological deposit. Mechanical excavation with an auger is the preferred investigation method. • If subsurface testing is required before approval of the project under Part 3A then a section 87 permit is required from the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC). If a planning focus meeting for this project was not held before 1st January 2005 then the Interim guidelines for Aboriginal Community Consultation need to be followed. This process requires a preparatory time of at least seven weeks prior to commencement of fieldwork; and • If subsurface testing is required after the approval of the project under Part 3A then the testing regime should form part of the statement of commitments for the project. Under the current proposal, the previously recorded PAD (PAD 1 on the eastern side of Little Bay Road) will not be affected by the project. However, if the current route is varied so that the cable is required to be laid on the eastern side of Little Bay Road then this PAD will be impacted. If this occurs then the (above) recommendations for K PAD 1 should be followed for PAD 1. The entire study area is located within landscapes that are considered to be sensitive in terms of their potential to contain Aboriginal sites. To mitigate potential impacts in these sensitive areas, monitoring of cable excavations should be conducted for the whole cable route. Monitoring should be undertaken by a qualified archaeologist and a representative from the La Perouse Local Aboriginal Land Council. • This proposed action should form part of the statement of commitments for the project and should follow the protocols for the location of new Aboriginal sites (Appendix 3). The protocols should also be included in the statement of commitments for the project. Based on a detailed aquatic ecology survey of the seabed along the proposed route corridor on either side of the main shipping route and numerous Hydrographic surveys it is concluded that there is no need for a detailed maritime survey of the proposed pipeline route. Two European historic sites, Prince Charles Parade and Captain Cook Drive, Kurnell, will be impacted in a minor way as part of this project by the installation of cable in the road reserve of these roads which are both listed on the Kurnell REP. It is considered that the heritage significance of the sites will not be significantly affected by the proposed 132kV electricity cable. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 REPORT OUTLINE........................................................................................................................... 1 2. ABORIGINAL PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................................... 4 3. STUDY METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 LITERATURE AND DATABASE REVIEW .............................................................................................. 4 3.2 FIELDWORK.................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 PROJECT PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................... 5 3.4 RECORDING PARAMETERS.............................................................................................................. 5 3.4.1 Aboriginal Sites ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.4.2 Historical Sites ...................................................................................................................... 6 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT......................................................................................................... 8 4.1 BOTANY BAY.................................................................................................................................. 8 4.2 KURNELL ....................................................................................................................................... 9 4.3 LA PEROUSE................................................................................................................................ 11 5. ABORIGINAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................... 12 5.1 TRIBAL AND LINGUISTIC BOUNDARIES............................................................................................ 12 5.2 ETHNOHISTORICAL OBSERVATIONS ............................................................................................... 12 5.3 POST CONTACT ABORIGINAL HISTORY .......................................................................................... 14 5.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS............................................................................................... 15 5.4.1 Kurnell ................................................................................................................................. 15 5.4.2 La Perouse.........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide
    Parks and reserves Visitor guide Featuring Annan River (Yuku Baja-Muliku) National Park and Resources Reserve Black Mountain National Park Cape Melville National Park Endeavour River National Park Kutini-Payamu (Iron Range) National Park (CYPAL) Heathlands Resources Reserve Jardine River National Park Keatings Lagoon Conservation Park Mount Cook National Park Oyala Thumotang National Park (CYPAL) Rinyirru (Lakefield) National Park (CYPAL) Great state. Great opportunity. Cape York Peninsula parks and reserves Thursday Possession Island National Park Island Pajinka Bamaga Jardine River Resources Reserve Denham Group National Park Jardine River Eliot Creek Jardine River National Park Eliot Falls Heathlands Resources Reserve Captain Billy Landing Raine Island National Park (Scientific) Saunders Islands Legend National Park National park Sir Charles Hardy Group National Park Mapoon Resources reserve Piper Islands National Park (CYPAL) Wen Olive River loc Conservation park k River Wuthara Island National Park (CYPAL) Kutini-Payamu Mitirinchi Island National Park (CYPAL) Water Moreton (Iron Range) Telegraph Station National Park Chilli Beach Waterway Mission River Weipa (CYPAL) Ma’alpiku Island National Park (CYPAL) Napranum Sealed road Lockhart Lockhart River Unsealed road Scale 0 50 100 km Aurukun Archer River Oyala Thumotang Sandbanks National Park Roadhouse National Park (CYPAL) A r ch KULLA (McIlwraith Range) National Park (CYPAL) er River C o e KULLA (McIlwraith Range) Resources Reserve n River Claremont Isles National Park Coen Marpa
    [Show full text]
  • MEU History Pre Pages
    132 UNITED: A HISTORY OF THE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES UNION IN NSW 15 The Electricity Industry rom its earliest years the Union became involved in the electricity industry, enrolling F members employed in various classifications in the Electricity Department of the City Council, including workers at Pyrmont Power Station, but not embracing those employed as tradesmen.1 Issues over pay and conditions, seniority, and redundancies occurred regularly, particularly with fluctuations in the need for power supply. One early issue in 1915 was that time clocks were not opened until the precise time of ceasing work, which meant that employees could not have a bath before then, resulting in delays in leaving the premises and consequently missed transport connections. This was rectified by management agreeing to open time clocks five minutes before ceasing time.2 By 1924, the City Council had gradually extended its electricity supply area, retailing its power in thirty-four Sydney suburbs, and supplying electricity in bulk to another seven suburbs. However, to achieve this, the City Council had to purchase electricity from the Railway Commissioners. To meet increasing demands, the City Council then constructed the largest electricity generating power station in the Southern Hemisphere, seven miles (eleven kms.) from central Sydney, on the northern shore of Botany Bay. It was called Bunnerong (Aboriginal for Sleeping Lizard), the name of the area on which it was constructed. It was stated in 1928 that “it would stand as a monumental work of members of the Union, who were mainly employed on its construction, there being on site about one thousand employees”.3 Bunnerong Power Station Source: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References
    Sand Nourishment Forum – Sand Nourishment Reference list October 2013 Updated from Coasts & Ports Conference, Sydney 2013 Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References Foreword: The Coasts & Ports 2013 Organising Committee introduced a half- day Sand Nourishment Forum comprising a Questions and Answers format directed to an experienced Panel with audience participation to explore and promote the use of sand nourishment as a viable method for managing short term erosion and long term coastal recession. The Forum emanated from great interest in beach nourishment around Australia, with a long history of successful projects from Adelaide to Noosa and major projects on the Gold Coast. The 2013 Conference was launched with a keynote address from Dr Stefan Aarninkhof who was intricately involved in the Delfland Sand Engine project in the Netherlands, which has introduced 21.5M m3 of offshore sands to the Dutch coast to provide coastal protection and prevent coastal inundation. As a precursor to the Beach Nourishment Forum at the Coast & Ports Conference 2013 in Sydney, A. D. Gordon (Forum Moderator) compiled the following list of reference material with contributions from J.T. Carley, E.D. Couriel, A. L. Jackson, A.R Jones, D.B. Lord, A.F. Nielsen, T.D. Shand, R.B. Tomlinson, T. Stul, R. Tucker. The list is intended to be a start on a “live “ document that can be added to, as further reference material becomes available/unearthed. The list has been compiled to assist those carrying out or contemplating beach nourishment, beach scraping and entrance by-passing or back-passing projects. It is hoped that other special interest topics to the coastal and port engineering profession may be run in similar forums as part of the future Coasts & Ports Conference series.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Audit Report, August 2015
    Controlled Copy ___ Site Audit Suitability of Remediation Action Plan, Part of Block 1 Southlands, 28 McPherson Street, Banksmeadow for Orica Australia Pty Ltd August 2015 J1130.23R-rev0 CMJA C. M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd Site Audit Suitability of Remediation Action Plan, Part of Block 1 Southlands, 28 McPherson Street, Banksmeadow August 2015 J1130.23R-rev0 Controlled Copy 1 Mr Stephen Corish Orica Australia Pty Ltd 16-20 Beauchamp Road MATRAVILLE NSW 2036 2 The Secretary Attention: Mr Chris Wilson NSW Department of Planning and Environment GPO Box 39 SYDNEY NSW 2001 3 The General Manager Botany Bay City Council PO Box 331 MASCOT NSW 1460 4 CMJA Library C. M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd ABN: 54 056 283 295 1/13 Kalinda Road, Bullaburra, NSW 2784 PO Box 10, Wentworth Falls, NSW 2782 Phone (02) 4759 3251 Fax (02) 4759 3257 www.cm-jewell.com.au [email protected] ___________________________________ CHRIS JEWELL Auditor This report has been prepared specifically for Orica Australia Pty Ltd. This report, the original data contained in the report, and its findings and conclusions remain the intellectual property of C. M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd. This report should not be used by other persons or for other purposes than those for which it was commissioned, and should not be reproduced except in full and with the permission of C. M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd. C. M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd will not support and will bear no liability for unauthorised use of this report. Site Audit – Suitability of RAP, Part of Block 1 Southlands, 28 McPherson Street, Banksmeadow Lot 1 DP85542 Lot 11 DP109505 Source: JBS&G 2015 Report Ref: J1130.23R The Site (proposed Lot 10) Rev: 0 Site Audit Statement SA263/3 Rev Date: 2-Aug-15 Current Lots / DPs C.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Botany Expansion June 2003 Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation
    Port Botany Expansion June 2003 Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation Visual Impact Assessment Architectus Sydney Pty Ltd ABN 11 098 489 448 41 McLaren Street North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia T 61 2 9929 0522 F 61 2 9959 5765 [email protected] www.architectus.com.au Cover image: Aerial view of the existing Patrick Terminal and P&O Ports Terminal looking south east. Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Methodology 5 3 Assessment criteria 6 3.1 Visibility 6 3.2 Visual absorption capacity 7 3.3 Visual Impact Rating 8 4 Location 9 5 Existing visual environment 10 5.1 Land form 10 5.2 Land use 10 5.3 Significant open space 11 5.4 Botany Bay 12 5.5 Viewing zones 13 6 Description of the Proposal 28 6.1 New terminal 28 6.2 Public Recreation & Ecological Plan 32 7 Visual impact assessment 33 7.1 Visual impact on views in the immediate vicinity 33 7.2 Visual impact on local views 44 7.3 Visual impact on regional views 49 7.4 Visual impact aerial views 59 7.5 Visual impact on views from the water 65 7.6 Visual impact during construction 74 8 Mitigation measures 75 9 Conclusion 78 Quality Assurance Reviewed by …………………………. Michael Harrison Director Urban Design and Planning Architectus Sydney Pty Ltd …………………………. Date This document is for discussion purposes only unless signed. 7300\08\12\DGS30314\Draft.22 Port Botany Expansion EIS Visual Impact Assessment Figures Figure 1. Location of Port Botany 9 Figure 2. Residential areas surrounding Port Botany 10 Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney for Dogs Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    SYDNEY FOR DOGS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Cathy Proctor | 234 pages | 20 Jun 2017 | Woodslane Pty Ltd | 9781925403541 | English | Mona Vale, Australia Sydney for Dogs PDF Book While dogs are permitted off-leash on the beach and in the water all day long on weekdays, come Saturdays, Sundays and Public Holidays they are only permitted before 9am and after 4pm. No wonder people drive here with their pup from all over Sydney! You can find more info on their website and download a map of the doggy designated areas here. Find out more about a dog-friendly getaway to Forster-Tuncurry. Access is from Foreshore Road, look for the signs for the boat ramp, where there is a large carpark. My Account My Profile Sign out. The wonders of a farm in the heart of a beautiful valley. While dogs are also meant to stay on leash on this beach, dogs are often let off leash, including when I visited. Starting from outside the Manly Beach Lifesaving Club, the walk leads you along the coast, past an assortment of unique sculptures and the historic Fairy Bower Pool. The largest dog-friendly park in Sydney, almost half of this huge park in Sydney is off-leash. The off-leash dog section is located adjacent to the Bonna Point Reserve carpark, in between the third and fourth rock groynes. As the name suggests, the Banksia track is brimming with beautiful native Australian wildflowers and banksias. The best time to visit this dog beach is during the cooler months of the year. Find out more about a dog-friendly getaway to Orange.
    [Show full text]
  • DEGRADATION of ENDEAVOUR CRATER, MARS. J. A. Grant1, L. S. Crumpler2, T
    46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015) 2017.pdf DEGRADATION OF ENDEAVOUR CRATER, MARS. J. A. Grant1, L. S. Crumpler2, T. J. Parker3, M. P. Golombek3, S. A. Wilson1, and D. W. Mittlefehldt4, Smithsonian Institution, NASM CEPS, 6th at Independence SW, Washington, DC, 20560 ([email protected]), 2New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science, 1801 Mountain Rd NW, Albuquerque, NM, 87104, 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, 4NASA JSC, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058. Introduction: The Opportunity rover has traversed icant degradation. A paucity of debris from the Shoe- portions of two western rim segments of Endeavour, a maker and Matijevic Formations relegates most erosion 22 km-diameter crater in Meridiani Planum (Fig. 1), to before the surrounding plains were emplaced, imply- for the past three years (e.g., [1]). The resultant data ing more efficient erosion in the past [7]. enables the evaluation of the geologic expression [2] Moreover, ejecta comprise ~50-60% of the relief and degradation state of the crater. Endeavour is Noa- around selected Mars complex craters [8] and only 20- chian-aged, complex in morphology [3], and originally 25% around selected lunar complex craters [6]. Hence, may have appeared broadly similar to the more pristine original rim relief at Endeavour may have been only 20.5 km-diameter Santa Fe complex crater in Lunae ~200-500 m or as much as ~400-800 m based on com- Palus (19.5°N, 312.0°E). By contrast, Endeavour is parison with complex Martian and lunar craters of considerably subdued and largely buried by younger broadly similar size [4, 5, 8].
    [Show full text]
  • NPWS Annual Report 2000-2001 (PDF
    Annual report 2000-2001 NPWS mission NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3 Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview 8 Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Performance and future directions 45 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 46 Partners and stakeholders 8 Voluntary conservation agreements 46 Legal basis 8 Biodiversity conservation programs 46 Organisational structure 8 Wildlife management 47 Lands managed for conservation 8 Performance and future directions 48 Organisational chart 10 Ecologically sustainable management Key result areas 12 of NPWS operations 48 Threatened species conservation 48 1 Conservation assessment 13 Southern Regional Forest Agreement 49 NSW Biodiversity Strategy 14 Caring for the environment 49 Regional assessments 14 Waste management 49 Wilderness assessment 16 Performance and future directions 50 Assessment of vacant Crown land in north-east New South Wales 19 Managing our built assets 51 Vegetation surveys and mapping 19 Buildings 51 Wetland and river system survey and research 21 Roads and other access 51 Native fauna surveys and research 22 Other park infrastructure 52 Threat management research 26 Thredbo Coronial Inquiry 53 Cultural heritage research 28 Performance and future directions 54 Conservation research and assessment tools 29 Managing site use in protected areas 54 Performance and future directions 30 Performance and future directions 54 Contributing to communities 55 2 Conservation planning
    [Show full text]
  • From Catchment to Inner Shelf: Insights Into NSW Coastal Compartments
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 1-1-2015 From catchment to inner shelf: insights into NSW coastal compartments Rafael Cabral Carvalho University of Wollongong, [email protected] Colin D. Woodroffe University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Cabral Carvalho, Rafael and Woodroffe, Colin D., "From catchment to inner shelf: insights into NSW coastal compartments" (2015). Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A. 4632. https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/4632 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] From catchment to inner shelf: insights into NSW coastal compartments Abstract This paper addresses the coastal compartments of the eastern coast by analysing characteristics of the seven biggest catchments in NSW (Shoalhaven, Hawkesbury, Hunter, Manning, Macleay, Clarence and Richmond) and coastal landforms such as estuaries, sand barriers, beaches, headlands, nearshore and inner shelf, providing a framework for estimating sediment budgets by delineating compartment boundaries and defining management units. It sheds light on the sediment dispersal yb rivers and longshore drift by reviewing literature, using available information/data, and modelling waves and sediment dispersal. Compartments were delineated based on physical characteristics through interpretation of hydrologic, geomorphic, geophysical, sedimentological, oceanographic factors and remote sensing. Results include identification of 36 primary compartments along the NSW coast, 80 secondary compartments on the South and Central coast, and 5 tertiary compartments for the Shoalhaven sector.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 134, AUGUST 2013 2 Imperative: Venus Continued
    Imperative: Venus — Virgil L. Sharpton, Lunar and Planetary Institute Venus and Earth began as twins. Their sizes and densities are nearly identical and they stand out as being considerably more massive than other terrestrial planetary bodies. Formed so close to Earth in the solar nebula, Venus likely has Earth-like proportions of volatiles, refractory elements, and heat-generating radionuclides. Yet the Venus that has been revealed through exploration missions to date is hellishly hot, devoid of oceans, lacking plate tectonics, and bathed in a thick, reactive atmosphere. A less Earth-like environment is hard to imagine. Venus, Earth, and Mars to scale. Which L of our planetary neighbors is most similar to Earth? Hint: It isn’t Mars. PWhy and when did Earth’s and Venus’ evolutionary paths diverge? This fundamental and unresolved question drives the need for vigorous new exploration of Venus. The answer is central to understanding Venus in the context of terrestrial planets and their evolutionary processes. In addition, however, and unlike virtually any other planetary body, Venus could hold important clues to understanding our own planet — how it has maintained a habitable environment for so long and how long it can continue to do so. Precisely because it began so like Earth, yet evolved to be so different, Venus is the planet most likely to cast new light on the conditions that determine whether or not a planet evolves habitable environments. NASA’s Kepler mission and other concurrent efforts to explore beyond our star system are likely to find Earth-sized planets around Sun-sized stars within a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]