DOCSLIB.ORG

Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Leningrad Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Leningrad Region International Studies Program Working Paper 99-2 March 1999 Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Leningrad Region IGR Team Roy Bahl Andre Timofeev Galina Kourliandskaia Alexander Derugin John Mikesell Yelena Nikolayenko Sally Wallace Inna Verbina Natalia Golovanova Natasha Minkova Dmitry Shiskin INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS IN LENINGRAD REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................1 PUBLIC FINANCES OF THE REGION AND THE REGIONAL GOVERNMENT ..............................................2 Leningrad Regional Economy .......................................................................................................2 Governance ........................................................................................................................4 Economic Structure.............................................................................................................4 Growth Potential of the Economy ........................................................................................5 Intra-Regional Disparities ....................................................................................................7 Budgetary Position in The Region.................................................................................................9 Revenue Structure...............................................................................................................9 Revenue Performance .......................................................................................................14 Federal Grants to the Region.............................................................................................15 FFSR Grants ...........................................................................................................15 Earmarked Grants....................................................................................................16 Mutual Settlements...................................................................................................18 Leningrad Distributions.............................................................................................18 Expenditure Autonomy......................................................................................................19 Expenditure Structure........................................................................................................23 Expenditure Disparities and Determinants...........................................................................24 Budgetary Position............................................................................................................25 Budgetary Position of the Oblast Government .............................................................................27 Expenditure Structure........................................................................................................28 Revenue Structure ............................................................................................................29 Budget Revisions and Execution During the Year ...............................................................32 Oblast-Local Fiscal Relations: Expenditures................................................................................38 Minimum Budgets .............................................................................................................40 Evaluation of the Minimum Budget Approach.....................................................................42 Equalization Features................................................................................................42 Are Minimum Expenditure Levels Honored?.............................................................43 Expenditure and Budget Policy: Evaluation.........................................................................44 Oblast-Local Fiscal Relations: Revenues.....................................................................................45 Local Revenue ..................................................................................................................46 Tax Sharing.......................................................................................................................47 Grants...............................................................................................................................50 Tax Effort .........................................................................................................................52 Deficits and Deficit Financing.............................................................................................56 Evaluation: Expenditure Equalization...........................................................................................58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) THE FINANCES OF KIROVSK RAYON.................................................................................................61 Population and Economy............................................................................................................61 Budgetary Position.....................................................................................................................62 Revenue Structure......................................................................................................................63 Local Revenues.................................................................................................................63 Taxes Assigned by the Federation.....................................................................................65 Shared Regional Taxes......................................................................................................67 Shared Federal Taxes .......................................................................................................68 Subventions ......................................................................................................................70 Borrowing and Loan Finance.............................................................................................71 Extra Budgetary Revenues and Accounts...........................................................................72 Expenditure Assignment….. .......................................................................................................72 Expenditure Structure……….....................................................................................................73 Expenditure Autonomy...............................................................................................................76 Expenditure Reform……… .......................................................................................................77 Region - Municipal Fiscal Relations ............................................................................................78 POLICY ISSUES AND REFORM OPTIONS.............................................................................................80 Federal - Regional Issues ...........................................................................................................81 Oblast -Local Relations: Recommendations ................................................................................84 REFORMING INTERGOVERNMENTAL FINANCE WITHIN REGIONS: A PROPOSAL..................................86 Instruments of Revenue Sharing..................................................................................................88 Determining the Budget Expenditure Share of Local Governments...............................................89 A Hard Budget Constraint ........................................................................................................90 Estimation of Expenditure Needs................................................................................................91 The Determinants of Expenditure Needs............................................................................91 Estimating Total Local Government Expenditure Needs......................................................93 Determining Expenditure Needs of Individual Municipalities................................................95 Estimating the Revenue Potential of Municipalities ..............................................................95 Comparing Expenditure Needs and Assigned Local Revenues............................................97 Covering the Financing Gap with Shared Taxes and Grants.........................................................98 Evaluation of the Proposed Method..........................................................................................102 Equalization.....................................................................................................................103 Transparency..................................................................................................................105 Local Autonomy .............................................................................................................106 Fiscal Discipline ..............................................................................................................106 Administrative Costs ......................................................................................................107
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Experimental Study of Municipal Solid Waste (Msw) Landfills and Non- Authorized Waste Damps Impact on the Environment
    Linnaeus ECO-TECH ´10 Kalmar, Sweden, November 22-24, 2010 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW) LANDFILLS AND NON- AUTHORIZED WASTE DAMPS IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Veronica Tarbaeva Dmitry Delarov Committee on Natural Resources of Leningrad region, Russia ABSTRACT A purpose was an analysis of waste disposal sites existing in the Leningrad region and a choice of facilities potentially suitable for the removal and utilization of greenhouse- and other gases. In order to achieve the purpose in view, data were collected on the arrangement of non-authorized landfills and waste dumps within the Leningrad region. The preliminary visual evaluation and instrumental monitoring were carried out for 10 facilities. The evaluation of greenhouse- and other gas emissions into the atmosphere as well as of ground water pollution near places of waste disposal was performed. A databank was created for waste disposal sites where it could be possible to organize the work on removing and utilizing of greenhouse gas. The conducted examination stated that landfills exert negative influence on the environment in the form of emissions into the atmosphere and impurities penetrating underground and surface water. A volume of greenhouse gas emissions calculated in units of СО2 – equivalent from different projects fluctuates from 63.8 to 8091.4 t in units of СО2 – equivalent. Maximum summarized emissions of greenhouse gases in units of СО2 – equivalent were stated for MSW landfills of the towns of Kirishi, Novaya Ladoga and Slantsy, as well as for MSW landfills near Lepsari residential settlement and the town of Vyborg. KEYWORDS Non-authorized waste dumps, MSW landfills, greenhouse gases, atmospheric air pollution, instrumental monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • High Commissioner on National Minorities
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe High Commissioner on National Minorities The Hague, 12 January 2001 Dear Mr. Minister, In the beginning of last year the government of Ukraine requested me to investigate the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country. When I discussed this with your government, it offered to facilitate such an investigation. Earlier, your government had requested me to investigate the situation of Russian language education in Ukraine. The government of Ukraine also declared itself willing to facilitate such an investigation. In the summer of last year I have studied the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country, assisted by two experts, Prof. Bowring from the United Kingdom and Mr. Zhekov from Bulgaria. My conclusions are based on visits to Moscow, St. Petersburg and Tyumen, where conversations took place with local and regional authorities and with representatives of Ukrainian organisations. In Moscow extensive consultations took place with governmental authorities. While in Moscow, I also received representatives of Ukrainian organisations in Krasnodar, Ekatarinburg and Moscow Oblast. I want to thank your government for its co-operation. H.E. Mr. Igor Ivanov Minister of Foreign Affairs Moscow P.O. Box 20062 Telephone Telefax [email protected] 2500 EB, The Hague (+31-70) 312 55 00 (+31-70)363 59 10 http://www.osce.org Prinsessegracht 22 2514 AP, The Hague The Netherlands Earlier in the summer, I have conducted similar studies in Ukraine, again assisted by Prof. Bowring and Mr. Zhekov. I visited, Kharkiv, Lviv, Odessa and Simferopol, and met there with the local and regional authorities and with representatives of the Russian community.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Published Version of a Chapter
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities. Citation for the original published chapter: Lundén, T. (2009) Valga-Valka, Narva – Ivangorod Estonia’s divided border cities – cooperation and conflict within and beyond the EU. In: Jaroslaw Jańczak (ed.), Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities (pp. 133-149). Berlin: Logos Thematicon N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21061 133 Valga-Valka, Narva-Ivangorod. Estonia’s Divided Border Cities – Co-operation and Conflict Within and beyond the EU Thomas Lundén Boundary Theory Aboundary is a line, usually in space, at which a certain state of affairs is terminated and replaced by another state of affairs. In nature, boundaries mark the separation of different physical states (molecular configurations), e.g. the boundary between water and air at the surface of the sea, between wood and bark in a tree stem, or bark and air in a forest. The boundaries within an organized society are of a different character. Organization means structuration and direction, i.e. individuals and power resources are directed towards a specific, defined goal. This, in turn, requires delimitations of tasks to be done, as well as of the area in which action is to take place. The organization is defined in a competition for hegemony and markets, and with the aid of technology. But this game of definition and authority is, within the limitations prescribed by nature, governed by human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation
    36117 V. 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Foreign Investment Advisory Service, Project is co-financed by the a joint service of the European Union International Finance Corporation in the framework of the and the World Bank Policy Advice Programme Public Disclosure Authorized SURVEY OF LAND AND REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CROSS-REGIONAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized March 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation. Cross-Regional Report The project has also received financial support from the Government of Switzerland, the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (seco). Report is prepared by the Media Navigator marketing agency, www.navigator,nnov.ru Disclaimer (EU) This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of its authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Disclaimer (FIAS) The Organizations (i.e. IBRD and IFC), through FIAS, have used their best efforts in the time available to provide high quality services hereunder and have relied on information provided to them by a wide range of other sources. However they do not make any representations or warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information included this report, or the results which would be achieved by following its recommendations. 2 Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation. Cross-Regional Report TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 10th Anniversary of IPO BANK SAINT PETERSBURG AT A GLANCE 50 000 1 930 000 Corporate customers Individual customers incl. 48 000 Internet Bank users incl. 960 000 Internet Bank users Assets Kaliningrad RUB bn 1 branch and 5 offices 607 3% of loans th 3% of deposits St. Petersburg 16 in Russia 58 offices 74% of loans 90% of deposits Moscow Novosibirsk 1 branch and 1 office Representative office Retail 24% of loans deposits 7% of deposits RUB bn 206 15th in Russia RECORD RESULTS IN THE HISTORY OF THE BANK: Revenues Net income RUB bn RUB bn 33 7.5 7% 75% BANK SAINT PETERSBURG Annual Report 2017 2 CONTENTS 04 STRATEGIC REPORT 05 Letter from the Management 07 10 years of public story 14 Strategy 2018–2020 Assets 17 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 18 Financial Highlights 607 23 Balance Structure 16th in Russia 27 Economic Trends 31 BUSINESS DIVISIONS 32 Corporate Banking 40 Retail Banking 43 Private Banking 44 Digital Banking 48 FROM RISK TO OPPORTUNITY 49 Risk Management 54 Development of credit risk evaluation approach 55 New horizons 56 CREATING WEALTH RESPONSIBLY 57 Customers 59 Colleagues 61 Community 64 Corporate Governance BANK SAINT PETERSBURG Annual Report 2017 3 Стратегический Финансовые Направления От рисков Корпоративная взгляд результаты бизнеса к возможностям ответственность STRATEGIC REPORT In 2017, Bank Saint Petersburg celebrated the 10th anniversary of IPO which was one of the most important events for the Bank and had a significant effect on all its subsequent history. BANK SAINT PETERSBURG Annual Report 2017 4 Стратегический Финансовые Направления От рисков Корпоративная взгляд результаты бизнеса к возможностям ответственность Strategic Financial Business From Risk Creating Wealth Report Performance Divisions to Opportunity Responsibly LETTER FROM THE MANAGEMENT Dear customers, investors and partners, We are pleased to present the annual results of Bank Saint Petersburg and development trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Saint-Petersburg, Russia INGKA Centres Reaching out 13 MLN to millions VISITORS ANNUALLY Perfectly located to serve the rapidly developing districts direction. Moreover, next three years primary catchment area will of the Leningradsky region and Saint-Petersburg. Thanks significantly increase because of massive residential construction to the easy transport links and 98% brand awareness, MEGA in Murino, Parnas and Sertolovo. Already the go to destination Vyborg Parnas reaches out far beyond its immediate catchment area. in Saint-Petersburg and beyond, MEGA Parnas is currently It benefits from the new Western High-Speed Diameter enjoying a major redevelopment. And with an exciting new (WHSD) a unique high-speed urban highway being created design, improved atmosphere, services and customer care, in St. Petersburg, becoming a major transportation hub. the future looks even better. MEGA Parnas meets lots of guests in spring and summer period due to its location on the popular touristic and county house Sertolovo Sestroretsk Kronshtadt Vsevolozhsk Western High-Speed Diameter Saint-Petersburg city centre Catchment Areas People Distance Peterhof ● Primary 976,652 16 km Kirovsk ● Secondary 656,242 16–40 km 56% 3 МЕТRО 29% ● Tertiary 1,701,153 > 40–140 km CUSTOMERS COME STATIONS NEAR BY YOUNG Otradnoe BY CAR FAMILIES Total area: 3,334,047 Kolpino Lomonosov Sosnovyy Bor Krasnoe Selo A region with Loyal customers MEGA Parnas is located in the very dynamic city of St. Petersburg and attracts shoppers from all over St. Petersburg and the strong potential Leningrad region. MEGA is loved by families, lifestyle and experienced guests alike. St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region MEGA Parnas is situated in the north-east of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Cooperation ENPI 2007-2013 in EN
    TUNNUS Tunnuksesta on useampi väriversio eri käyttötarkoituksiin. Väriversioiden käyttö: Pääsääntöisesti logosta käytetään neliväriversiota. CMYK - neliväripainatukset kuten esitteet ja värillinen sanomalehtipainatus. PMS - silkkipainatukset ym. erikoispainatukset CMYK PMS Cross-border C90% M50% Y5% K15% PMS 287 C50% M15% Y5% K0% PMS 292 C0% M25% 100% K0% PMS 123 cooperation K100% 100% musta Tunnuksesta on käytössä myös mustavalko- , 1-väri ja negatiiviversiot. Mustavalkoista tunnusta käytetään mm. mustavalkoisissa lehti-ilmoituspohjissa. 1-väri ja negatiiviversioita käytetään vain erikoispainatuksissa. Mustavalkoinen 1-väri K80% K100% K50% K20% K100% Nega Painoväri valkoinen The programme has been involved in several events dealing with cross-border cooperation, economic development in the border area and increasing cooperation in various fi elds. Dozens of events are annually organised around Europe on European Cooperation Day, 21 September. The goal of the campaign is to showcase cooperation and project activities between the European Union and its partner countries. The project activities result in specialist networks, innovations, learning experiences and the joy of doing things together. Contents Editorial, Petri Haapalainen 4 Editorial, Rafael Abramyan 5 Programme in fi gures 6-7 BUSINESS AND ECONOMY 8 BLESK 9 Innovation and Business Cooperation 9 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION 10 Arctic Materials Technologies Development 11 Cross-border Networks and Resources for Common Challenges in Education – EdNet 11 TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATIONS 12 Open Innovation Service for Emerging Business – OpenINNO 13 International System Development of Advanced Technologies Implementation in Border Regions – DATIS 13 SERVICES AND WELL-BEING 14 IMU - Integrated Multilingual E-Services for Business Communication 15 Entrepreneurship Development in Gatchina District - GATE 15 TOURISM 16 Castle to Castle 17 St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for Development of a Salmon Management Plan in the Luga River
    BASE Project - Implementation of the Baltic Sea Action Plan in Russia Final report: Support for development of a Salmon management plan in the Luga River Pilot Activity ‘Support for development of a salmon management plan in the Luga River’ Implemented by (Main Consultant) All-Russian Social Organisation “All-Russian Society of Nature Protection”, Leningrad Region office (ARSoNP) Support provided by (EU Expert) Piotr Dębowski Inland Fisheries Institute in Gdansk/Poland. Authors of the report Sergey Titov, Dmitry Sendek, Sergey Mikhelson, Margarita Barabanova, Anton Uspensky, Olga Semenova and Sergey Rezvyi Compilation of this report State Research Institute on Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA For bibliographic purposes this document should HELCOM 2014, BASE project 2012-2014: be cited as ‘Support for development of a salmon management plan in the Luga River’ Design of cover Johanna Laurila, HELCOM Cover photo State Research Institute on Lake and River Fisheries (GosNIORKh), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA Back cover Johanna Laurila, HELCOM English editing (Executive summary and Introduction) Howard McKee, Key Image Ltd Implemented in the framework of: Project Implementation of the Baltic Sea Action Plan in Russia (BASE) Funded by EU Implemented by HELCOM Secretariat and St. Petersburg Public Organisation ‘Ecology and Business’ This report does not necessarily represent the views of HELCOM. HELCOM does not assume responsibility for the content of the report. Information included in this publication or extracts thereof are free for citation on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. Copyright 2014 Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HELCOM CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical-Economic Substantiation of The
    PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Technical-economic substantiation of the development of tourist route(-s) in the section: Ivangorod (The Narova River) – The Rosson River (Children sanitary centre) – Silent Lake Saint-Petersburg January 2008 The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 1 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Plan 1. Studying the present situation 1.1. Development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.1.1. General situation 1.1.2. Present infrastructure 1.1.3. Existent routes 1.1.3.1. Camp routes 1.1.3.2. Cruise lines 1.1.3.3. Regular communication 1.1.4. Sail-motor tourism development 1.1.5. Sports fishing in the region 1.1.6. Perspectives for the development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.2. Investigation of potentially suitable places for water tourism along the route 1.2.1. Description of the rivers 1.2.2. Present recreation areas and parking places on the banks of the Narova River, Rosson River and lake Silent (Vaikne) 1.2.3. Historical places upon the Narova and the Rosson rivers. 1.2.4. History of navigation along the Narova and Rosson Rivers, Silent lake. 1.2.5. Existent mooring constructions along the route 1.2.6. Existent ships on the rivers that. 1.2.7. Approaches to Parking places 1.2.8. Resume concerning apt places for water tourism 1.3. Legal regulations of the development of the route(-s) along the rivers Narova, Rosson and lake Silent 1.3.1. Boundary regime rules. 1.3.2. Rules of the use of ships of small size and constructions for their berthing 1.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 06.10.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109078651 ARG 7233.0000 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'34'' 23S19'09'' FX 1 ADD 2 109078654
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Petersburg Leningrad Region
    Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad region - slide package for a foreign investor Elias Kallio October 2019 1 Contents 1. General information 3 2. Regional economy 6 3. Prosperity and consumption 19 4. External economic relations 23 5. Business environment 34 6. Additional information 38 The information in this document is compiled from a variety of sources. The Pan-European Institute assumes no responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of the information. 2 1. General information a) Geographical location Distances from Saint Petersburg to some European capitals: Helsinki 300 km Tallinn 320 km Riga 490 km Moscow 630 km Vilnius 660 km Minsk 690 km Stockholm 690 km Warsaw 1030 km Oslo 1090 km Berlin 1320 km London 2100 km Paris 2170 km 3 1. General information b) Basic facts Saint Petersburg Leningrad region Area 1 439 km2 84 500 km2 (% of Russia’s total) (0.008 %) (0.5 %) Population 5 383 890 1 847 867 (% of Russia’s total) (3.7 %) (1.3%) Main cities - Gatchina (93.7), Vyborg (76.4), Sosnovy Bor (68.3) (thousand people) Borders with Leningrad region Finland, Estonia, St. Petersburg, the Novgorod, Pskov, Vologda regions, Republic of Karelia Main industries Machine building, metallurgy, metal-processing, energy, Engineering, chemicals, forestry, agriculture, wood food, chemical and petrochemical, light industry, working, pulp and paper, food, fuel, construction non-ferrous metallurgy and power Natural resources Sand and gravel deposits, peat, clay, pebble, sandstones, Forest, bauxite, slate, limestone, phosphorite, clay, loam granite, gravel • St. Petersburg is second densest populated Federal subject after Moscow out of 85* Federal subjects 4 *the international community does not recognize Crimea and City of Sevastopol as a part of Russia 1.
    [Show full text]