DOCSLIB.ORG

Pace Through the Race

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

annual REPORT 2018 PACE THROUGH THE RACE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL CONTENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 CORPORATE PROFILE 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 11 CEO’S REVIEW 14 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 41 PROFILES OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT 81 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 177 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 197 GLOSSARY 343 APPENDIX A 355 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company APPENDIX B 359 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only CORPORATE INFORMATION 366 1 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 9,357 Adjusted EBITDA 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 1,514 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% 16.2% EBIT 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 942 Share of Profits from Associates and joint ventures 955 620 848 368 536 Pre Tax Profit 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 147 Profit/(Loss) 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 (91) Profit/(Loss) Margin 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% (1.0%) Adjusted Net Profit 856 1,077 292 671 17 Adjusted Net Profit Margin 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% 0.2% Recurring Net Profit 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 486 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (0.006) Total Assets 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 14,857 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 2,237 Net Debt 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 8,837 3 Reduced weight Manoeuvring and speedy CORPORATE 01 PROFILE Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia. In 2018, RUSAL remained among the largest producers of primary aluminium and alloys globally. million tonnes 8 7.5 7 6.6 6 5 4.0 3.8 4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 2 1.6 1 0 Hongqiao Chalco RUSAL Xinfa Rio TintoEGA SPICAlcoa Norsk Vedanta Group Hydro 2017 2018 * China producers 2018 output wasn’t published/publicly available at the time of Annual Report preparation, therefore Aladdiny source was used for the volumes estimation. Source: Based on RUSAL’s internal company report, and peer companies’ publicly available results, announcements, reports and other information. RUSAL’s production chain includes bauxite and neph- operations. Our existing bauxite resource base is suffi- eline ore mines, alumina refineries, aluminium smelters cient to supply for over 100 years of operations. and casting houses, foil mills, packaging and wheels pro- duction centers. Efficient midstream, proprietary R&D and internal EPCM expertise Secured access to green, renewable electricity RUSAL aluminum smelting operations go through Electricity is a key component of the aluminum regular upgrades. RUSAL has developed its own production process. RUSAL’s core smelting operations in-house R&D, design and engineering centers and are favorably located close to the Siberian hydro power operates RA-300, RA-400 and Green Soederberg plants sourcing from them approximately 93% of the smelting technologies. A new energy efficient and Group’s total electricity needs. The Company has environmentally friendly RA-500, RA-550 smelting long term agreements with the region’s hydro-power technology has been designed and currently RUSAL is energy suppliers. Using renewable and environmentally testing it, targeting the best energy efficiency yields in friendly hydro generated electricity, RUSAL is targeting the industry. the lowest CO2 footprint in the industry. RUSAL is actively developing a groundbreaking inert an- Captive raw material supplies ode technology. Introducing this state-of-art technology into the production process will lead to complete elimi- RUSAL alumina production capacities are located nation of greenhouse gas and polyaromatic hydrocarbon in Russia and abroad. These operations cover over emissions coupled with 10% cut in operational costs ’ approximately 100% of the Group s total alumina needs. through reducing anode and energy consumption and over a 30% cut in Greenfield projects expenditure costs. Our alumina refineries bauxite needs are covered by up to 75% with supplies from the Group’s bauxite mining 6 Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 Cost efficiency 2017 RUSAL has launched a new low carbon aluminium brand, ALLOW, which features a significantly lower carbon The efficient smelting technologies together with footprint – specific volume of greenhouse gas emissions low cost input material and utilities mix secures the – as compared to industry average (4t CO2/t Al vs 12.3t Company’s global leadership on the cost curve. CO2/t Al of world average (scope 1 and 2 at the smelter). The Company first verified its ALLOW brand in 2018 with Focus on higher margin downstream business the help of the international auditor KPMG. In 2017, 77% of the Company’s output was attributed to this brand. The RUSAL has a diversified product mix with a strong share computations followed the methodology contained in of VAP in the portfolio (1.66 million tonnes per annum the International Aluminium Institute’s carbon footprint out of 3.67 million tonnes of total sales). reporting guidelines published in February 2018. Diversified sales geography Diversification opportunities through investments RUSAL sales mix is represented by a diversified portfolio of regions. The Company delivers aluminium products — As at the Latest Practicable Date, RUSAL owns an ef- to the domestic market and to all key global consuming fective 27.82% interest in Norilsk Nickel, the world’s regions (Europe, America, South East Asia). largest nickel and palladium producer and one of the leading producers of platinum and copper1. — ’ Growth potential of the RUSAL platform RUSAL s 50/50 LLP Bogatyr Komir coal joint ven- ture in the Ekibastuz coal basin, one of the largest coal basins in the CIS, provides RUSAL with a natu- The BEMO Project (RUSAL and Rushydro JV) includes ral energy hedge. the 3,000 megawatt BEMO HPP (the construction of which was completed in 2014) and Boguchansky aluminium smelter in the Krasnoyarsk region of Russia. Key facts In March 2019, the launch of the second part of the first stage brought the total production capacity to almost In 2018, RUSAL accounted for approximately 5.8% 300 thousand tonnes per annum. of the world’s aluminium output and about 6.2% of the world’s alumina production, generated from the One of RUSAL’s other major projects is the Taishet following facilities located around the world. aluminium smelter in the Irkutsk region. The production capacity of the first line once launched will be — 10 aluminium smelters, of which 9 are in Russia, and 428.5 thousand tonnes. During 2018, the Company 1 in Sweden continued to finance this smelter’s construction using its — 8 alumina refineries, of which 3 are in Russia, 1 in own funds. It is important to note that the launch of these Ireland, 1 in Ukraine, 1 in Jamaica, 1 in Italy and 1 in projects is happening when the market is experiencing a Guinea growing aluminium deficit. — 7 bauxite mines, of which 2 are in Russia, 1 in Ja- maica, 3 in Guinea and 1 in Guyana — Implementing environmental initiatives 1 nepheline mine in Russia — 4 foil mills, of which 3 are in Russia and 1 in Arme- nia RUSAL was one of the first Russian companies that joined — 4 powder plants, all of which are in Russia UN Global Compact. By following its environmental — 2 silicon factories, all of which are in Russia policy and undertaking to regularly review and update — 2 wheels factories situated in Russia its provisions, the Company is constantly developing and improving its environmental management system and implementing its principles at all production facilities. In RUSAL’s ordinary shares are listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Moscow Exchange. 1 Source: www.nornickel.ru 7 Map of Operations Annual Report RUSAL 2018 MAP OF OPERATIONS ARMENIA 01 Armenal AUSTRALIA 02 QAL 14 GUINEA 19 21 32 03 Compagnie des bauxites 15 25 23 de Kindia (CBK) 24 12 33 17 40 22 34 26 28 04 Dian Dian Project 18 16 13 37 05 Friguia Bauxite & 35 29 20 31 Alumina Complex 27 30 07 36 RUSSIA 38 GUYANA 12 Achinsk Alumina Refinery 39 10 41 06 Bauxite Company 13 Bogoslovsky Alumina Refinery 41 of Guyana (BCGI) 14 Boguchanskaya HPP 0808 01 (BEMO) IRELAND 15 Boguchansky Aluminium Smelter 07 Aughinish Alumina (BEMO) 16 Boksitogorsk Alumina Refinery ITALY 17 Bratsk Aluminium Smelter 08 Eurallumina 18 Irkutsk Aluminium Smelter 09 19 Kandalaksha Aluminium Smelter 03 05 JAMAICA 20 Khakas Aluminium Smelter 11 04 09 WindalcO 21 Kia-Shaltyr Nepheline Mine 06 22 Krasnoturyinsk Powder Metallurgy KAZAKHSTAN 23 Krasnoyarsk Aluminium Smelter 10 LLP Bogatyr Komir 24 Nadvoitsy Aluminium Smelter 25 North Urals Bauxite Mine NIGERIA 26 Novokuznetsk Aluminium Smelter 11 ALSCON 27 Sayana Foil 28 SAYANAL 29 Sayanogorsk Aluminium Smelter 02 30 Shelekhov Powder Metallurgy 31 Silicon (ZAO Kremniy), Shelekhov 32 SKAD wheels factory 33 Taishet Aluminium Smelter (project) 34 Timan Bauxite 35 Urals Alumina Refinery 36 Urals Foil 37 Urals Silicon 38 Volgograd Aluminium Smelter 39 Volgograd Powder Metallurgy SWEDEN 40 KUBAL UKRAINE 41 Nikolaev Alumina Refinery 8 Map of Operations Annual Report RUSAL 2018 14 19 21 32 15 25 23 24 12 33 17 40 22 34 26 28 18 16 13 37 35 29 20 27 31 36 30 07 38 39 10 4141 0808 01 09 03 05 11 04 06 02 Aluminium Foil Nepheline ore Alumina Powders Other business Bauxite Silicon Wheels 9 Improved swing Vibration absorbing CHAIRMAN’S 02 STATEMENT Chairman’s Statement Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Bernard Zonneveld Chairman of the Board Dear Shareholders, I am delighted to welcome you to RUSAL’s Annual Report for 2018.
Recommended publications
  • Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011

    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011

    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011 Report dated April 16, 2013 Moscow and New York, April 16, 2013 The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their third survey of Russian multinationals today.1 The survey, conducted from November 2012 to February 2013, is part of a long-term study of the global expansion of emerging market non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 The present report covers the period 2009-2011. Highlights Russia is one of the leading emerging markets in terms of outward foreign direct investments (FDI). Such a position is supported not by several multinational giants but by dozens of Russian MNEs in various industries. Foreign assets of the top 20 Russian non-financial MNEs grew every year covered by this report and reached US$ 111 billion at the end of 2011 (Table 1). Large Russian exporters usually use FDI in support of their foreign activities. As a result, oil and gas and steel companies with considerable exports are among the leading Russian MNEs. However, representatives of other industries also have significant foreign assets. Many companies remained “regional” MNEs. As a result, more than 66% of the ranked companies’ foreign assets were in Europe and Central Asia, with 28% in former republics of the Soviet Union (Annex table 2). Due to the popularity of off-shore jurisdictions to Russian MNEs, some Caribbean islands and Cyprus attracted many Russian subsidiaries with low levels of foreign assets.
  • Press Release (PDF)

    Press Release (PDF)

    MECHEL REPORTS THE FY2020 FINANCIAL RESULTS Consolidated revenue – 265.5 bln rubles (-8% compared to FY 2019) EBITDA* – 41.1 bln rubles (-23% compared to FY 2019) Profit attributable to equity shareholders of Mechel PAO – 808 mln rubles Moscow, Russia – March 11, 2021 – Mechel PAO (MOEX: MTLR, NYSE: MTL), a leading Russian mining and steel group, announces financial results for the FY 2020. Mechel PAO’s Chief Executive Officer Oleg Korzhov commented: “The Group’s consolidated revenue in 2020 totaled 265.5 billion rubles, which is 8% less compared to 2019. EBITDA amounted to 41.1 billion rubles, which is 23% less year-on-year. “The mining division accounted for about 60% of the decrease in revenue. This was due to a significant decrease in coal prices year-on-year. In conditions of coronavirus limitations, many steelmakers around the world cut down on production, which could not fail to affect the demand for metallurgical coals and their price accordingly. By the year’s end the market demonstrated signs of a recovery, but due to China’s restrictions on Australian coal imports, coal prices outside on China remained low under this pressure. High prices in China have supported our mining division’s revenue to a certain extent. In 4Q2020 we increased shipments to China as best we could considering our long-term contractual obligations to partners from other countries. These circumstances became in many ways the reason for a decrease in our consolidated EBITDA. In Mechel’s other divisions EBITDA dynamics were positive year-on-year. “The decrease in the steel division’s revenue was also due to the coronavirus pandemic.
  • Templeton Eastern Europe Fund Equity LU0078277505 31 August 2021

    Templeton Eastern Europe Fund Equity LU0078277505 31 August 2021

    Franklin Templeton Investment Funds Emerging Markets Templeton Eastern Europe Fund Equity LU0078277505 31 August 2021 Fund Fact Sheet For professional use only. Not for distribution to the public. Fund Overview Performance Base Currency for Fund EUR Performance over 5 Years in Share Class Currency (%) Templeton Eastern Europe Fund A (acc) EUR MSCI EM Europe Index-NR Total Net Assets (EUR) 231 million Fund Inception Date 10.11.1997 160 Number of Issuers 45 Benchmark MSCI EM Europe 140 Index-NR Investment Style Blend Morningstar Category™ Emerging Europe Equity 120 Summary of Investment Objective 100 The Fund aims to achieve long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in listed equity securities of issuers organised under the laws of or having their principal activities within the countries of Eastern Europe, as well as 80 08/16 02/17 08/17 02/18 08/18 02/19 08/19 02/20 08/20 02/21 08/21 the New Independent States, i.e. the countries in Europe and Asia that were formerly part of or under the influence of Performance in Share Class Currency (%) the Soviet Union. Cumulative Annualised Since Since Fund Management 1 Mth 3 Mths 6 Mths YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 10 Yrs Incept Incept A (acc) EUR 6.42 11.11 26.64 33.63 51.24 53.18 56.89 34.32 260.58 5.54 Krzysztof Musialik, CFA: Poland A (acc) USD 5.94 7.30 23.95 29.16 49.67 55.85 66.03 10.37 25.43 1.44 Ratings - A (acc) EUR B (acc) USD 5.87 6.92 23.29 28.09 47.85 50.20 56.08 -2.95 -24.30 -1.84 Benchmark in EUR 5.12 10.50 24.75 24.42 37.82 37.48 54.51 30.76 271.45 5.67 Overall Morningstar Rating™: Calendar Year Performance in Share Class Currency (%) Asset Allocation 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 A (acc) EUR -15.33 36.67 -21.23 17.61 20.37 4.84 -19.49 -3.97 17.37 -40.02 A (acc) USD -7.78 33.81 -24.78 34.11 16.61 -5.88 -29.18 0.07 19.63 -41.94 B (acc) USD -8.80 31.98 -25.72 32.46 14.98 -7.07 -30.09 -1.33 18.15 -42.70 Benchmark in EUR -19.73 34.75 -7.46 5.88 29.27 -5.03 -20.28 -8.61 22.37 -21.10 % Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance.
  • William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project

    William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project

    Russia Political Economy Project William R. Spiegelberger The Foreign Policy Research Institute thanks the Carnegie Corporation for its support of the Russia Political Economy Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: William R. Spiegelberger Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute April 2019 COVER: Designed by Natalia Kopytnik. Photography: Oleg Deripaska (World Economic Forum); St. Basil’s Cathedral (Adob Stock); Ruble (Adobe Stock); Vladimir Putin (kremlin.ru); Rusal logo (rusal.ru); United States Capitol (Adobe Stock; Viktor Vekselberg (Aleshru/Wikimedia Commons); Alumnium rolls (Adobe Stock); Trade War (Adobe Stock). Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
  • The Impact of Western Sanctions on Russia and How They Can Be Made Even More Effective

    The Impact of Western Sanctions on Russia and How They Can Be Made Even More Effective

    The impact of Western sanctions on Russia and how they can be made even more effective REPORT By Anders Åslund and Maria Snegovaya While Western sanctions have not succeeded in forcing the Kremlin to fully reverse its actions and end aggression in Ukraine, the economic impact of financial sanctions on Russia has been greater than previously understood. Dr. Anders Åslund is a resident senior fellow in the Eurasia Center at the Atlantic Council. He also teaches at Georgetown University. He is a leading specialist on economic policy in Russia, Ukraine, and East Europe. Dr. Maria Snegovaya is a non-resident fellow at the Eurasia Center, a visiting scholar with the Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies at the George Washington University; and a postdoctoral scholar with the Kellogg Center for Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. THE IMPACT OF WESTERN SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA AND HOW MAY 2021 THEY CAN BE MADE EVEN MORE EFFECTIVE Key points While Western sanctions have not succeeded in forcing the Kremlin to fully reverse its actions and end aggression in Ukraine, the economic impact of financial sanctions on Russia has been greater than previously understood. Western sanctions on Russia have been quite effective in two regards. First, they stopped Vladimir Putin’s preannounced military offensive into Ukraine in the summer of 2014. Second, sanctions have hit the Russian economy badly. Since 2014, it has grown by an average of 0.3 percent per year, while the global average was 2.3 percent per year. They have slashed foreign credits and foreign direct investment, and may have reduced Russia’s economic growth by 2.5–3 percent a year; that is, about $50 billion per year.
  • Deal Drivers Russia

    Deal Drivers Russia

    February 2010 Deal Drivers Russia A survey and review of Russian corporate finance activity Contents Introduction 1 01 M&A Review 2 Overall deal trends 3 Domestic M&A trends 6 Cross-border M&A trends 8 Private equity 11 Acquisition finance 13 Valuations 14 02 Industries 15 Automotive 16 Energy 18 Financial Services 20 Consumer & Retail 22 Industrial Markets 24 Life Sciences 26 Mining 28 Technology, Media & Telecommunications 30 03 Survey Analysis 32 Introduction Prediction may be fast going out of fashion. At the end of 2008, CMS commissioned mergermarket to interview 100 Russian M&A and corporate decision makers to find out what they thought about the situation at the time and what their views on the future were. Falling commodity prices were viewed as the biggest threat, the Financial Services sector was expected to deliver the greatest growth for M&A activity and the bulk of inward investment was expected from Asia. The research revealed that two thirds of the respondents expected the overall level of M&A activity to increase over the course of 2009, with only one third predicting a fall. That third of respondents was right and, in general, the majority got it wrong or very wrong. The survey did get some things right – the predominance of Who knows? What’s the point? We consider the point to be the domestic players, the increase of non-money deals, the in the detail. Our survey looks at the market in 2009 sector number of transactions against a restructuring background, by sector – what was ‘in’ and what was ‘out’.
  • Yakutia) “…The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Is the Largest Region in the Russian Federation and One of the Richest in Natural Resources

    Yakutia) “…The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Is the Largest Region in the Russian Federation and One of the Richest in Natural Resources

    Investor's Guide to the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) “…The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) is the largest region in the Russian Federation and one of the richest in natural resources. Needless to say, the stable and dynamic development of Yakutia is of key importance to both the Far Eastern Federal District and all of Russia…” President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin “One of the fundamental priorities of the Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) is to develop comfortable conditions for business and investment activities to ensure dynamic economic growth” Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Egor Borisov 2 Contents Welcome from Egor Borisov, Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 5 Overview of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 6 Interesting facts about the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 7 Strategic priorities of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) investment policy 8 Seven reasons to start a business in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 10 1. Rich reserves of natural resources 10 2. Significant business development potential for the extraction and processing of mineral and fossil resources 12 3. Unique geographical location 15 4. Stable credit rating 16 5. Convenient conditions for investment activity 18 6. Developed infrastructure for the support of small and medium-sized enterprises 19 7. High level of social and economic development 20 Investment infrastructure 22 Interaction with large businesses 24 Interaction with small and medium-sized enterprises 25 Other organisations and institutions 26 Practical information on doing business in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 27 Public-Private Partnership 29 Information for small and medium-sized enterprises 31 Appendix 1.
  • Holborn Gate Master Fax Template

    Holborn Gate Master Fax Template

    **CONFERENCE CALL** MECHEL OAO (NYSE:MTL) Scheduled for: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:00 AM New York Time 3:00 PM London Time 6:00 PM Moscow Time __________________________________________________________________ You are cordially invited to participate on a conference call with the management of Mechel OAO to discuss our 2008 first half and nine months results. Igor Zyuzin, Chief Executive Officer, will host the call. Please call the number below approximately 10 minutes prior to the scheduled time of the call, quoting Mechel, and the chairperson’s name, Alexander Tolkach. Conference Call Phone Numbers: US: +1 718 354 1158 International: +44 20 7138 0810 Confirmation Code: 8468348 The earnings release will be distributed prior to the conference call. In addition, the conference call will be available live via the Internet. To access the call and associated slides, please visit our website at: http://www.mechel.com/investors/fresults/index.wbp on the day of the call. A replay of the call will be available until 11:59PM New York time on December 24th. To access, please dial, US: +1 718 354 1112; UK: +44 20 7806 1970. From both areas, enter: 8468348# to access. MECHEL 2008 FIRST HALF AND NINE MONTHS RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL TO BE BROADCAST OVER THE INTERNET Moscow, Russia — December 15, 2008 — Mechel OAO (NYSE: MTL) announces that it intends to release its results for the first half ending June 30, 2008, and the nine months ending on September 30, 2008 on Thursday, December 18, 2008. In conjunction with this release, Mechel will host a conference call, which will be simultaneously broadcast live over the Internet.
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998

    The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998

    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
  • Oleg Deripaska Has Struggled for Legitimacy in the United States, Where He Has Been Dogged by Civil Lawsuits Questioning the Methods He Used to Build That Empire

    Oleg Deripaska Has Struggled for Legitimacy in the United States, Where He Has Been Dogged by Civil Lawsuits Questioning the Methods He Used to Build That Empire

    The Globe and Mail (Canada) May 11, 2007 Friday Preferred by the Kremlin, shunned by the States BYLINE: SINCLAIR STEWART, With a report from Greg Keenan in Toronto SECTION: NEWS BUSINESS; STRONACH'S NEW PARTNER: 'ONE OF PUTIN'S FAVOURITE OLIGARCHS'; Pg. A1 LENGTH: 957 words DATELINE: NEW YORK He is perhaps the most powerful of Russia's oligarchs, a precocious - some would say ruthless - billionaire, who built his fortune against the bloody backdrop of that country's "aluminum wars" in the 1990s. He has nurtured close ties to the Kremlin, married the daughter of former president Boris Yeltsin's son-in-law, amassed an estimated $8-billion in personal wealth and built a corporate empire that stretches from metals and automobiles to aircraft and construction. Yet for all his success at home, 39-year-old Oleg Deripaska has struggled for legitimacy in the United States, where he has been dogged by civil lawsuits questioning the methods he used to build that empire. Mr. Deripaska has repeatedly denied allegations levelled against him, and he has not been specifically accused by American authorities of any crime. However, these whispers about shady business dealings may raise concerns about his $1.5-billion investment in Canada's Magna International, not to mention Magna's attempts to win control of DaimlerChrysler, an iconic American company. The United States has recently shown protectionist proclivities, citing national security concerns to quash both a Chinese state-owned oil company's bid for Unocal Ltd. and a planned acquisition of U.S. port service contracts by Dubai Ports World.
  • Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – the Competition for Customers

    Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – the Competition for Customers

    Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – The Competition for Customers James Henderson NG 73 January 2013 The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, of any of the Institute’s members, and/or of the author’s other affiliations. Copyright © 2013 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-66-4 ii Abbreviations and Units of Measurement bbls Barrels bcm Billion cubic metres bcma Billion cubic metres per annum bn bbls Billion barrels boepd Barrels of oil equivalent per day bpd Barrels per day E&P Exploration and Production ESPO East Siberia – Pacific Ocean (Pipeline) FSU Former Soviet Union IOC International Oil Company kboepd Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day kbpd Thousands of barrels per day km Kilometres mm bbls Million barrels mcm Thousands of cubic metres mmboepd Millions of barrels of oil equivalent per day] mmbpd Millions of barrels per day mmbtu Million British thermal units mmcm Millions of cubic metres mmt Millions of tonnes mmtpa Millions of tonnes per annum Mm tonnes Millions of tonnes P&P Proved and Probable tcm
  • US Sanctions on Russia

    US Sanctions on Russia

    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.