DOCSLIB.ORG

1981 FINAL REPORT Development of UNDE R CONTRACT: DOT-OS-50233

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1981 FINAL REPORT Development of UNDE R CONTRACT: DOT-OS-50233 DOT/RSPA/DPB/-50/81/19 Planning and JANUA RY 1981 FINAL REPORT Development of UNDE R CONTRACT: DOT-OS-50233 Public Transportation Conference Proceedings Terminals Pre pa red for: Office of University Research Washingt on, D.C. 20590 U.S. Deportment of Transportation S.G.,t.I.u. LtdttARV Research and Special Programs Administration tiJ J :) 3 T,:'1 :I;:))'.''; f ... f\l?;)' NOTICE This document is disseminated tmder the sponsorship of the Department of Trans­ portation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Technical Report Documentation Page I , Roporr No. 2. GoYe Mt,\~f"'lt At~e!s1on No. J. Rec1p1enf s Cotalog No, DOT/RSPA/DPB-50/81/19 4 . T itle end Subr1de 5. Report D ote Planning and Development of Public Transportation January 1981 Terminals 6. Pe,fo,m,ng 0,9,on, zotion Code 8. Pe,fo,m1ng O,gon110t1on Report ,....,o . I 7. Atori sJ ester A. Hoel, Larry G . Richards UVA/529036/CEBl/107 /i:-nitnr~'l 9. P e ,lorm 1n9Or9on1 1ot 1on Nome ond Address 10. 'Nork Un,t No. (TRAISJ Department of Civil Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Science 11. Controct or G,ont No, Univer sity of Virginia, Thornton Hall DOT-OS-50233 Charlottesville, VA 22901 13. Type of Repo, r ond Period Cove red 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome ond A ddre ss Office of University Research Final Report Research and Special Programs Administration u . S . Department of Transportation 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C . 20590 DPB-50 IS. 5uppl emenfory Note s Monitor: Norma n G. Paulhus, Jr, I I-40 16. Absrtoct This report describes the proceedings of a National Conference on the Planninz and D~yelopmcnt of Public Trans~ortation Terminals held in Silver Spring, Marylan on September 21-24, 1980. T e conference included both formal papers presented lo plenary sessions and small group workshops focused on particular design issues of current importance. Formal 12a2ers covered all aspects of transit station planning and design, with special attention to passengers, access and traffic, and operations and maintenance. Recent experiences in transit station design and renovation were reviewed, including intermodal terminals, from both domestic and international perspectives. Particular systems described in detail included WMATA, BART, MARTA, and New York. An overview of the Methodology for Transit Station Design was also prcse.nted. Workshops dealt with nine topic areas: Transit Station Design Methodology; Intermodal Terminal Planning, Design and Operations ; Passenger Processing and Information Systems; Station Access and Traffic ; Station Main Lenance and Operations; Transit Station Secur ity; Design for the I lan dicapped; Joint Development, Land Use and Station Impacts; Computer Methods and Transit Station Simulation. 17, Key Word -s 18. Distrtbvtion Srore rn e nt Transit Station Design Limited Edition Intermodal Terminals 19. Secu,iry Clo:1'ld . : of tl-,1 1 recortJ 20. Se c1.1,,,.,. Closs,t. (oi t h, :1 poge) 11, No. of P ogu 22. ?,,ce Unclassified Unclassified F arm DOT F 1700.7 ,8-72l Reproduction of comple t e d poge out hori ,ed METRIC CONVERSION FACTORS ... ::: A1111r11im1te Conversions t1 Metric Mnsares A1111rui•1t1 Conversions lrora Metric MtH■ rH ..N s,•• M ■ tti,ty ., e, s.••• , Wh■ Ye ■ 1 ■ -w Te Fi■• M•hi,ty ., Te FIN s,••• , Sy,Hel Whe■ YN 11.R- ;: LENIGTH .. -= ~ in LENGTH ,rm mi 11 imeters 0 .. 04 inchea inche'S in ~ cm centimetlltt'S 0.4 m meters J.3 feet "yd cm meters 1.1 v...i• ;,, inches • 2.s centKnlter■ m mi cm 0.6 miles It feet 30 centimeten = kilomet• s meters m ""' -,Ill yord• 0.9 mi\es t.l kt lo,,etet ■ !: ,.,; ""' AFIU ~ 2 AREA ..,.... inches in cnr2 ecau•• cenUmeten O. 16 ... aquart yanll v-11 ~ .., aquarti meters 1.2 .,2 IQllM'9 ind'lel 6 .6 14U.,.. centimet•• cnr2 sq.,..-, miles mf2 aqua,. meters ,., = ..,,,1 square kih:wntt9fs G.4 ft2 aQUaH feet 0.09 2 ac...es 9quare meters .?- ha hect••• 110,000 m J 2.5 ,,,2 aquare yardt 0.1 ~ 9quat'I i.m' ..2 ..,_,. mile ■ 2.1 kilornet.,. ha aaea 0.4 heeaare ■ !? "' -= MASS jwei1•tl MA!!:!11 lweiJ!!!l !? 0.035 ounco or §. ..,..,cl• lb g kg kilograirM Z.2 OI -· 21 gr-• ' 1.1 shontona log,­ kg toones ( 1000 kg) Ill pound• 0.45 ki tons tonne1 - short 0.9 (2000 lb) • --CCC ~ VOlUME VOLUME ... fl oz ntllllllt•• 0 ,03 tluld-• ml ml pt 5 milliliter• lite<S 2.1 pintli teapioon• ■ I milliliter" ml quertl qt n.., tab,Hpoonl 15 - I l ite,s ·t.OI ml ti or fluid ounces 30 milllliteH Hiers 0 .26 gallons ,., I I 113 - cups 0.24 liters cubic meters 3S cubic fHt C m> li1ers cubic yards ydl pt pintt 0.47 mJ cubic meters 1.3 liteu qt q...ns 0.95 gallons J.I liHtrt I gel mJ tt> cubic teet D.03 cubic rnetet't TEMPERATURE (111ct) ml .. -cc ..r cubic vard1 D.711 cubic metMs 9/5 !then FahrenMlt ' TEMPERATURE (11act) •c Celsius . add321 temoertUt"e ■ temoef■ture •c .. Fetirenheit S/ 9 l•lt• Celsius •r stdm■cting temperatu,e temperatu,e ~F 32 98-6 212: 32) 0 - •~ I I I .,·~ I 1 1 ·~ 1 , 1~ 1 I I l~O I I , 2C:O ~ ~ ~ ; · ' I I I ' i I ,I I I t othef ~ • act and more del<'I• led 1i\bleS. see NBS M,5,C. Pub!. 286. -40 - 20 0 20 40 60 90 101l • , It'! 2 .SC l~w:&CTl y ), For conve,s,ons oc 1'l' oc 11.. , ts of W,ual'lt.s and Measures. Pr.ce $2.2~. SO Cat.Jl og No. ClJ .10 ;266. ~ ~ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This conference was conducted under contract DOT-OS-50233 from the Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of University Research to the University of Virginia, Charlottesville. The editors wish to thank Ors. Robert J. Ravera, the former director of the Program of University Research, and Dr. Sherwood C. Chu, the current director, for their support and en­ couragement throughout this project. We are also most grateful to Mr. Norman G. Paulhus, Jr., the contract monitor for this project, for his many contribu­ tions to t_he success of this conference and the entire research program. Many people and organizations were involved in the success of the con­ ference. The conference was organized with the cooperation of the Transl?or­ tation Research Board (TRB) arid the American Public Transit Association (APTA). We would like to acknowledge the role of TRB Committee AlE03 ·in the planning, development and conduct of the conference. The Conference Planning Committee consisted of John J. Fruin (Chairman), Colin H. Alter, David J. Andrus, Jr., John P. Braaksma, S. Lee Carlson, William J . Hayduk, Barry Kaas, Hanan A. Kivett, Walter H. Kraft, Jerome C. Lutin, W. R. McCuthen, John P. O'Connor, Robert A. Olmsted, Wilfred Sergeant, Gregory Benz, Frank J . Cihak (representing APTA), Michael J . Demetsky, W. Campbell Graeub (representing TRB) , Lester A. Hoel, John A. Levy, Norman G. Paulhus, Jr. , Larry G. Richards, and Peter Strobach. Special thanks are extended to Jack Fruin and Walter Kraft, the past and present chairmen of the TRB Committee on Intermodal Transfer Facilities, for their many activities and contributions to this conference. W. Campbell Graeub provided mailing lists of possible conference participants, reviewed our conference plans, promotional material, and hotel arrangements, and made many helpful suggestions . Colin Alter recommended possible meeting sites in the Washington area and helped us make final hotel arrangements. Lillian C. Liburdi, Deputy Administrator of the Urban Mass Transporta­ tion Administration, delivered the keynote address at the conference. We thank her for her enlightening and provocative talk, and for her interest and participation in the conference. Cody Pfanstiel, the Director of Public Relations at WMAT A, arranged and conducted a tour of the Washington Metro for conference participants. We thank him for a most valuable tour. He was assisted by Mr. Fountroy and i Colin Alter. The tour covered all aspects of Metro's operation, and partici­ pants found it extremely worthwhile. The production of the Conference Proceedings was carried out by the Publications Group of the Research Laboratories for the Engineering Sciences (RLES) at the University of Virginia. We particularly wish to thank Jackie Harding, who patiently typed the entire manuscript and endured our many revisions, and Sandra Sullivan, Supervisor of the Publications Group. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the many contributions of Dr. Meredith M. Richards and Mr. Douglas Mccants to the smooth functioning of the con­ ference and production of this proceedings. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS, Lester A. Hoel WELCOMING RElv!_A R KS, Sherwood C. Chu 3 CONFERENCE SUMMARY, Lester A. Hoel and Larry G. Richards 5 "WHAT IS A STATION"?, Wilfred Sergeant . 25 THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN PASSENGER TERMINAL DESIGN, John ·J. Fruin . 35 STATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, Robert S. Korach 47 ACCESS AND TRAFFIC, Walter H. Kraft . 53 THOUGHTS ON THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARTA STATIONS, Richard Stanger . 63 RECENT EXPERIENCES IN TRANSIT STATION DESIGN: WASHINGTON METRO, Albert J . Roohr . 77 BART STATIONS, A REAPPRAISAL, Wilmot R. Mccutchen 93 THE DESIGN OF INTERMODAL TERMINALS: A CASE STUDY, Hanan A. Kivett 111 STATION RENOVATION IN OLDER RAIL RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEMS, Robert A. Olmsted . 137 THE PORT AUTHORITY BUS TERMINAL , NEW YORK, NEW YORK Sheldon D. Wander . 147 CANADIAN INTERCITY TERMINALS , Pet er Strobach . 157 SOME FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF EUROPEAN TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS , John P . Braaksma . 167 STATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY, Michael J. Demetsky . 191 WORKSHOP SUMMARIES : WSl CRITIQUE OF DESIGN METHODOLOGY, Norman G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Easements to District of Columbia for Metropolitan Branch Trail
    Joint Development and Real Estate Committee Item III-A November 18, 2010 Easements to District of Columbia for Metropolitan Branch Trail Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 100906 Yes No TITLE: Easements to DC for Metropolitan Branch Trail PURPOSE: Board approval to negotiate and execute an Easement Agreement with the District of Columbia Department of Transportation (District) for construction, operation and maintenance of portions of the Metropolitan Branch Trail (MBT) on Metro property near the Brookland-CUA, Fort Totten and Takoma Metrorail stations. DESCRIPTION: The District is constructing the MBT, a shared-use walk and bicycle path, along an eight-mile section of rail right-of-way from Union Station, Washington, DC to Silver Spring, Maryland. When completed, the MBT will be an important transportation route providing direct access to seven Metro Red Line stations and one Green Line station, also connecting to the Washington area`s regional trails at the Capital Crescent Trail and the East Coast Greenway. Based on counts on similar regional trails, the District expects more than 1 million users per year. Surface easements for the MBT on three Metro properties have previously been approved by the Board and the remaining three parcels are submitted for approval in this action. The District is currently in the design stage for these sections of the trail but to comply with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant requirements, the real estate must be acquired and agreements entered into, prior to allocation of FHWA funding. Easements are required on the following properties: Brookland-CUA (10,036 square feet); Fort Totten (65,154 square feet); and Takoma (10,683 square feet).
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
    Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia
    ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 06-27 District of Columbia CASE NO.06-27 57A2 Figure 2: Ballston Station Area Sites EXHIBIT NO.57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 3: Courthouse Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 4: Crystal City Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 5: Dunn-Loring-Merrifield Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 6: Eisenhower Avenue and King Street Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 7: Farragut West Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 8: Friendship Heights Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 9: Gallery Place-Chinatown Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 57A2 Figure 10: Grosvenor-Strathmore Station Area Sites ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 11: New Carrollton Station Area Sites 57A2 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 12: Silver Spring Station Area Sites 57A2 MJ Station Entrance/Exit • Office c::J Residential ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 06-27 Figure 13: U Street/African American Civil War Memoriai/Cardozo Station Area Sites 57A2 3. Data Collection At each site, data about the travel characteristics of individuals who work, live, shop or use the sites were collected through a series of questionnaires conducted through self-administered survey forms and oral intercept interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • C 070245 ZMK – Wythe Avenue Rezoning and Text Amendment
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION February 16, 2011 / Calendar No. 13 C 070245 ZMK IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by JBJ, LLC pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for an amendment of the Zoning Map, Section No. 12d: nd 1. changing from an M3-1 District to an M1-4/R6A District property bounded by South 2 rd Street, Wythe Avenue, South 3 Street, and a line 210 feet northwesterly of Wythe Avenue; and nd 2. establishing a Special Mixed Use District (MX-8) bounded by South 2 Street, Wythe rd Avenue, South 3 Street, and a line 210 feet northwesterly of Wythe Avenue; as shown on a diagram (for illustrative purposes only) dated September 13, 2010 and subject to the conditions of CEQR Declaration E-261, in the Borough of Brooklyn, Community District 1. The application for an amendment to the Zoning Map was filed by JBJ, LLC on December 19, 2006 to change an M3-1 district to an MX8: M1-4/R6A mixed use district to facilitate the construction of a 6-story, 104,000-square-foot mixed use development with 79 dwelling units and ground floor retail located on the eastern half of Block 2415, between South Second and South Third Streets and Kent and Wythe Avenues, in Community District 1, Brooklyn. RELATED ACTIONS In addition to the Zoning Map amendment that is the subject of this report, implementation of the proposed development also requires action by the City Planning Commission on the following application, which is being considered concurrently with this application: N 070246 ZRK Zoning Text amendment relating to the Inclusionary Housing Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Analyzed the Vehicle Monitoring Data for This Event
    WMSC Commissioner Brief: W-0034 – Fatality at Farragut West Station December 9, February201 2019 Prepared for Washington Metrorail Safety Commission meeting on August 4, 2020 Safety event summary: A customer jumped from the Farragut West platform to the track bed as outbound Blue Line Train 406 entered the station on Track 2 on December 9, 2019 at approximately 12:53 p.m. Upon report of the collision, Metro Transit Police and D.C. Fire EMS were called and third rail power was de- energized on Track 2 at 12:55 p.m. Power was de-energized to Track 1 at 1:07 p.m. Service resumed after 3 p.m. Probable Cause: The customer intentionally placed themselves in front of oncoming train. Corrective Actions: None planned in specific response to this event. Train 3166 broken TWC antenna repaired. Staff recommendation: Adopt final report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Safety & Environmental Management FINAL REPORT OF INVESTIGATION A&I E19675 SMS 20191209#84904 Date of Event: 12/09/2019 Type of Event: Collision (Fatality) Incident Time: 12:54 hrs. Location: Farragut West Station, Track 2 Time and How received by SAFE: 12/09/2019 - 12:55 hrs. - SAFE on-call phone WMSC Notification: 12/09/2019 - 13:09 hrs. WMSC on-call phone Responding Safety officers: WMATA SAFE: Yes, SAFE 203 WMSC: No Other: N/A Rail Vehicle: (L) 3166.3167 x 3114.3115 x 3156.3157 Injuries: Fatal Injury Damage: Car 3166 Broken TWC Antenna Emergency Responders: Metro Transit Police Department (MTPD), Office of Car Maintenance (CMNT), Office of Rail Transportation (RTRA), DC Fire and EMS (DCFD), Safety and Environmental Management (SAFE), Track and Structure (TRST).
    [Show full text]
  • D. Rail Transit
    Chapter 9: Transportation (Rail Transit) D. RAIL TRANSIT EXISTING CONDITIONS The subway lines in the study area are shown in Figures 9D-1 through 9D-5. As shown, most of the lines either serve only portions of the study area in the north-south direction or serve the study area in an east-west direction. Only one line, the Lexington Avenue line, serves the entire study area in the north-south direction. More importantly, subway service on the East Side of Manhattan is concentrated on Lexington Avenue and west of Allen Street, while most of the population on the East Side is concentrated east of Third Avenue. As a result, a large portion of the study area population is underserved by the current subway service. The following sections describe the study area's primary, secondary, and other subway service. SERVICE PROVIDED Primary Subway Service The Lexington Avenue line (Nos. 4, 5, and 6 routes) is the only rapid transit service that traverses the entire length of the East Side of Manhattan in the north-south direction. Within Manhattan, southbound service on the Nos. 4, 5 and 6 routes begins at 125th Street (fed from points in the Bronx). Local service on the southbound No. 6 route ends at the Brooklyn Bridge station and the last express stop within Manhattan on the Nos. 4 and 5 routes is at the Bowling Green station (service continues into Brooklyn). Nine of the 23 stations on the Lexington Avenue line within Manhattan are express stops. Five of these express stations also provide transfer opportunities to the other subway lines within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • 38B Map and Timetable
    How to use this timetable Effective 12-18-16 ➤ Use the map to find the stops closest to where you will get on and off the bus. ➤ Select the schedule (Weekday, Saturday, Sunday) for when you will travel. Along the top of the schedule, Ballston-Farragut Square Line find the stop at or nearest the point where you will get on the bus. Follow that column down to the time you want to leave. ➤ Use the same method to find the times the bus is scheduled to arrive at the stop where you will get off the bus. Serves these locations- ➤ If the bus stop is not listed, use the Brinda servicio a estas ubicaciones time shown for the bus stop before it as the time to wait at the stop. l Ballston-MU station ➤ The end-of-the-line or last stop is listed l Clarendon station in ALL CAPS on the schedule. l Court House station Rosslyn station Cómo Usar este Horario l ➤ Use este mapa para localizar las l Georgetown paradas más cercanas a donde se l Farragut North station subirá y bajará del autobús. l Farragut West station ➤ Seleccione el horario (Entre semana, sábado, domingo) de cuando viajará. A lo largo de la parte superior del horario, localice la parada o el punto más cercano a la parada en la que se subirá al autobús. Siga esa columna hacia abajo hasta la hora en la que desee salir. ➤ Utilice el mismo método para localizar las horas en que el autobús está programado para llegar a la parada en donde desea bajarse del autobús.
    [Show full text]
  • SIS Building Directions to Campus
    New SIS Building Directions to Campus Parking For students visiting the SIS Graduate Admissions Office, Pay-As-You-Go parking is available across the street from main campus in the Nebraska Avenue Commuter Lot (at the intersection of Nebraska and New Mexico Avenues, NW). Pay-As-You-Go machines are located on either side of the Nebraska Avenue Commuter Lot. By Car From northeast of Washington (New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore) follow I-95 south to I-495 west toward Silver Spring. (See “From I-495” below.) From northwest of Washington (western Pennsylvania, western Maryland) follow I-270 south. Where I- 270 divides, follow the right-hand branch toward northern Virginia. (Do not take the branch toward Washington.) Merge with I-495 (Capital Beltway). (See “From I-495” below.) From south or west of Washington (northern Virginia, Norfolk, Richmond, Charlottesville) follow I-95 north or I-66 east to I-495 (Capital Beltway). Take I-495 north toward Silver Spring. (See “From I-495” below.) From I-495 (Capital Beltway) Take exit 39 and follow the signs for River Road (Maryland Route 190) east toward Washington. Continue east on River Road to the fifth traffic light. Turn right onto Goldsboro Road (Maryland Route 614). At the first traffic light, turn left onto Massachusetts Avenue NW (Maryland Route 396). Continue on Massachusetts Avenue NW through the first traffic circle (Westmoreland Circle). From Westmoreland Circle, continue straight until you reach a second traffic circle (Ward Circle). Take the first right turn out of Ward Circle onto Nebraska Avenue. American University’s main campus is to the right of Nebraska Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Leisure Pass Group
    Explorer Guidebook Empire State Building Attraction status as of Sep 18, 2020: Open Advanced reservations are required. You will not be able to enter the Observatory without a timed reservation. Please visit the Empire State Building's website to book a date and time. You will need to have your pass number to hand when making your reservation. Getting in: please arrive with both your Reservation Confirmation and your pass. To gain access to the building, you will be asked to present your Empire State Building reservation confirmation. Your reservation confirmation is not your admission ticket. To gain entry to the Observatory after entering the building, you will need to present your pass for scanning. Please note: In light of COVID-19, we recommend you read the Empire State Building's safety guidelines ahead of your visit. Good to knows: Free high-speed Wi-Fi Eight in-building dining options Signage available in nine languages - English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin Hours of Operation From August: Daily - 11AM-11PM Closings & Holidays Open 365 days a year. Getting There Address 20 West 34th Street (between 5th & 6th Avenue) New York, NY 10118 US Closest Subway Stop 6 train to 33rd Street; R, N, Q, B, D, M, F trains to 34th Street/Herald Square; 1, 2, or 3 trains to 34th Street/Penn Station. The Empire State Building is walking distance from Penn Station, Herald Square, Grand Central Station, and Times Square, less than one block from 34th St subway stop. Top of the Rock Observatory Attraction status as of Sep 18, 2020: Open Getting In: Use the Rockefeller Plaza entrance on 50th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenues).
    [Show full text]
  • The New York City Waterfalls
    THE NEW YORK CITY WATERFALLS GUIDE FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS WELCOME PLAnnING YOUR TRIP The New York City Waterfalls are sited in four locations, and can be viewed from many places. They provide different experiences at each site, and the artist hopes you will visit all of the Waterfalls and see the various parts of New York City they have temporarily become part of. You can get closest to the Welcome to THE NEW YORK CIty WATERFALLS! Waterfalls at Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park in DUMBO; along the Manhattan Waterfront Greenway, north of the Manhattan Bridge; along the Brooklyn The New York City Waterfalls is a work of public art comprised of four Heights Promenade; at Governors Island; and by boat in the New York Harbor. man-made waterfalls in the New York Harbor. Presented by Public Art Fund in collaboration with the City of New York, they are situated along A great place to go with a large group is Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park in Brooklyn, which is comprised of 12 acres of green space, a playground, the shorelines of Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn and Governors Island. picnic benches, as well as great views of The New York City Waterfalls. These Waterfalls range from 90 to 120-feet tall and are on view from Please see the map on page 18 for other locations. June 26 through October 13, 2008. They operate seven days a week, You can listen to comments by the artist about the Waterfalls before your from 7 am to 10 pm, except on Tuesdays and Thursdays, when the visit at www.nycwaterfalls.org (in the podcast section), or during your visit hours are 9 am to 10 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency, CERCLA
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CERCLA Education Center Superfund 101 December 9 through 13, 2019 Schedule of Events The Superfund 101 training will be held Monday, December 9 through Friday, December 13, 2019, at the William Jefferson Clinton South Federal Building in Washington, D.C. The training will be held in Room WJCS 6226. The training will begin Monday at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time and end at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time on Friday. Please plan your flights accordingly. The William Jefferson Clinton South Federal Building is located at: 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Please note: The training will be held at the William Jefferson Clinton South Federal Building in Washington, D.C.; a block of sleeping rooms is set up at the Embassy Suites DC Convention Center hotel in Washington, D.C. which is located within walking distance (approximately a 13-minute walk) to the William Jefferson Clinton South Federal Building. Local participants can park in the surrounding parking garages if necessary. Parking rates vary per garage. Embassy Suites DC Convention Center hotel in Washington D.C. Embassy Suites DC Convention Center 900 10th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Phone: (202) 739-2001 For additional information about the Embassy Suites DC Convention Center hotel, please visit https://embassysuites3.hilton.com/en/hotels/district-of-columbia/embassy-suites-by-hilton-washington-dc-convention-center- WASCCES/index.html. Sleeping Room Reservations A block of rooms has been reserved at the Embassy Suites DC Convention Center hotel in Washington, D.C. The lodging rate is $184 per night plus sales tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel Study
    FARRAGUT NORTH AND FARRAGUT WEST PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY TUNNEL STUDY Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (BPPD) August 23, 2004 Prepared By: Parsons KGP Design Studio Basile Baumann Prost & Associates Farragut North and Farragut West Pedestrian Passageway Tunnel TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION and DESCRIPTION of PROJECT 5 II. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION OPTIONS 6 A. Connections at Farragut West 6 B. Connections at Farragut North 7 C. Pedestrian Tunnel Options 7 1. Option 1 – Pedestrian Tunnel 8 2. Option 2 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Moving Walkway 8 3. Option 3 – Pedestrian Tunnel with Commercial Space 8 III. CODES and DATA 9 IV. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS and DECISION PROCESS 9 A. Initial Scope and Alternatives 9 1. Alternative 1: Pedestrian Tunnel to Existing Mezzanines in North and West 10 2. Alternative 2: Pedestrian Tunnel to South End of Farragut North and Existing Mezzanine at Farragut West 10 B. Entrances To the Tunnel 11 C. Farragut North – South Entrance to Platform Options, Alternative 2 and All Options 11 D. Farragut West – Station Entrance and Platform Elevators, All Alternatives and Options 12 E. Decision Process 12 V. STRUCTURAL FEATURES 13 A. Modification of Farragut North Station 13 B. Modification of Farragut West Station 15 C. Relocation of Vent Shaft at 17th Street 15 D. Tunnel Construction Method 16 E. Emergency Egress of Passageway 16 VI. MECHANICAL FEATURES A. General Mechanical Issues Common to All Options 17 1. Passageway Air Conditioning 17 2. Vent Shaft Relocation 18 3. Station Mechanical Room Modifications 18 4. Fire Protection 19 5.
    [Show full text]