District Domestic Product

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT of HIMACHAL PRADESH 2011-12 to 2015-16 (Base 2011-12) Economic & Statistics Department Government of Himachal Pradesh PREFACE The central and state authorities and research institutions often require data on economic activities and levels of living of people at the district level for planning and policy purposes. It is increasingly being recognized that effective developmental interventions, whether at planning, implementation or monitoring stages, have to be rooted at the district level. This view has been formally mandated by the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, which require the preparation of district plans and it was also one of the key indicator of “Thirteen Finance Commission”. Income of a district or state is considered one of the most important indicators/barometers to measure the economic growth/development of a district vis-à-vis others. State Income estimates measure the volume of all the goods and services produced in the economy during a given period of time. The composite estimates of income at the State level do not reveal whether the benefits of development have been evenly distributed among the districts or not. District Income estimates throw light on the regional development of the economy and its structural shift over the years. These estimates are useful to study the inter-sectoral and inter district economic imbalances and help in removing such disparities. These estimates help in drawing up suitable planning programmes and in measuring the effects of their implementation. Thus, they may prove very useful for formulation, review and implementation of broad policy objectives. Efforts in this direction have been hampered by lack of adequate and appropriate data, especially on district level incomes. This publication is the outcome of the above aspects. It attempts to lay down in some detail the data needs and estimation methodology that can be used, keeping in mind the resources and limitations that exist at the district level. This is the fifth attempt of estimating the District Domestic Product 2011-12 to 2015-16 under new series base year 2011-12. The first DDP estimates were prepared for the year 1993-94 to 1998-99 with base year 1993-94 . I am thankful to various official and non-official agencies for their whole hearted co-operation in providing the data within stipulated time. I place on record my appreciation for the concerted efforts put in by the officer and officials of District/ State Income Unit in bringing out this edition of District Domestic Product. Pradeep Chauhan Economic Adviser Contents Chapters Particulars Page No Preface Executive Summary I Introduction to Himachal Pradesh 1-5 1.1 Brief History of Himachal Pradesh 1 1.2 Geographic Profile of Himachal Pradesh 1 1.3 Demographic Profile of Himachal Pradesh 2 1.4 Economic Profile of Himachal Pradesh 3 1.4.1 Growth performance of State Economy 4 II Concepts and Definitions of State and District 6-10 Domestic Product 2.1 The background 6 2.2 Concepts and Definitions 6 2.3 Measures relating to income 7 2.4 Financial Intermediation Services Indirectly Measured 7 (FISIM) 2.5 Consumption of fixed capital (CFC) 8 2.6 Division of Economy in to sectors 8 2.7 Method of estimation 9-10 III Sector-wise Methodology for Estimation of 11-22 District Domestic Product 3.1 The background 11 3.2 Estimation of workforce 11 3.3 Sector-wise Methodology 12 3.3.1 Agriculture including Livestock (Animal Husbandry) 13 3.3.1.1 Agriculture 13 3.3.1.2 Animal Husbandry 15 3.3.1.3 Value of inputs for crops and animal husbandry 15 3.3.2 Forestry and Logging 15 3.3.2.1 Major Forest Products 15 3.3.2.2 Minor Forest Products 16 3.3.3 Fisheries 16 3.3.4 Mining and Quarrying 17 3.3.5 Manufacturing (Organized &Un-organized) 17 3.3.6 Construction 18 3.3.7 Electricity, Gas and Water Supply 18 3.3.7.1 Electricity 18 3.3.7.2 Gas 18 3.3.7.3 Water Supply 18 Chapters Particulars Page No 3.3.8 Transport Storage & Communication 19 3.3.8.1 Railways 19 3.3.8.2 Transport 19 3.3.8.3 Storage 19 3.3.8.4 Communication & services related to broadcasting 19 3.3.9 Trade Hotel and Restaurants 20 3.3.10 Banking and Insurance 20 3.3.11 Real Estate, Ownership of Dwellings, Business Services 21 and Legal Services 3.3.12 Public Administration 21 3.3.13 Other services 21 3.4 Limitations 22 IV Analysis of District Income Estimates 23-30 4.1 Size of the Income 23 4.2 Sectoral Composition of District of Income Estimates 25 4.3 Per Capita Income 30 Statistical tables Table Statements Page No District-wise Gross Domestic Product at Current Prices 2011-12 to 1 1 2015-16 District-wise Net Domestic Product at Current Prices 2011-12 to 1 2 2015-16 3 District Wise Per Capita Income at Current prices 2011-12 to 2015-16 1 District wise Percentage Contribution to Gross State Value Added 2 4 at Current prices 2011-12 to 2015-16 District wise Gross District Value Added/Domestic Product 3 5 ( GDVA/GDDP) 2011-12 At Current Prices District wise Gross District Value Added/Domestic Product 4 6 ( GDVA/GDDP) 2012-13 At Current Prices District wise Gross District Value Added/Domestic Product 5 7 ( GDVA/GDDP) 2013-14 At Current Prices District wise Gross District Value Added/Domestic Product 6 8 ( GDVA/GDDP) 2014-15 At Current Prices District wise Gross District Value Added/Domestic Product 7 9 ( GDVA/GDDP) 2015-16 At Current Prices District wise Net Value Added/Domestic Product( NDVA/NDDP) 8 10 2011-12 At Current Prices District wise Net Value Added/Domestic Product( NDVA/NDDP) 9 11 2012-13 At Current Prices District wise Net Value Added/Domestic Product( NDVA/NDDP) 10 12 2013-14 At Current Prices District wise Net Value Added/Domestic Product( NDVA/NDDP) 11 13 2014-15 At Current Prices District wise Net Value Added/Domestic Product( NDVA/NDDP) 12 14 2015-16 At Current Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Crop Sector 2011-12 13 15 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Crop Sector 2012-13 14 16 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Crop Sector 2013-14 15 17 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Crop Sector 2014-15 16 18 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Crop Sector 2015-16 17 19 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Livestock Sector 2011-12 18 20 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Livestock Sector 2012-13 19 21 At Current Basic Prices Table Statements Page No District- wise Output and Value Added from Livestock Sector 2013-14 20 22 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Livestock Sector 2014-15 21 23 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Livestock Sector 2015-16 22 24 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Forestry Sector 2011-12 23 25 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Forestry Sector 2012-13 24 26 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Forestry Sector 2013-14 25 27 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Forestry Sector 2014-15 26 28 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Forestry Sector 2015-16 27 29 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Fishing Sector 2011-12 28 30 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Fishing Sector 2012-13 28 31 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Fishing Sector 2013-14 29 32 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Fishing Sector 2014-15 29 33 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Fishing Sector 2015-16 30 34 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Mining & Quarrying 31 35 Sector 2011-12 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Mining & Quarrying 32 36 Sector 2012-13 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Mining & Quarrying 33 37 Sector 2013-14 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Mining & Quarrying 34 38 Sector 2014-15 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Mining & Quarrying 35 39 Sector 2015-16 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Manufacturing Sector 36 40 2011-12 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Manufacturing Sector 37 41 2012-13 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Manufacturing Sector 38 42 2013-14 At Current Basic Prices Table Statements Page No District- wise Output and Value Added from Manufacturing Sector 39 43 2014-15 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Output and Value Added from Manufacturing Sector 40 44 2015-16 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Electricity, Gas, Water Supply and 41 45 Other Utility Services Sector 2011-12 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Electricity, Gas, Water Supply and 42 46 Other Utility Services Sector 2012-13 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Electricity, Gas, Water Supply and 43 47 Other Utility Services Sector 2013-14 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Electricity, Gas, Water Supply and 44 48 Other Utility Services Sector 2014-15 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Electricity, Gas, Water Supply and 45 49 Other Utility Services Sector 2015-16 At Current Basic Prices District- wise Value Added from Construction Sector 2011-12 46 50 At Current Basic Prices
Recommended publications
  • Himachal Pradesh in the Indian Himalaya

    Himachal Pradesh in the Indian Himalaya

    Mountain Livelihoods in Transition: Constraints and Opportunities in Kinnaur, Western Himalaya By Aghaghia Rahimzadeh A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Louise P. Fortmann, Chair Professor Nancy Lee Peluso Professor Isha Ray Professor Carolyn Finney Spring 2016 Mountain Livelihoods in Transition: Constraints and Opportunities in Kinnaur, Western Himalaya Copyright © 2016 By Aghaghia Rahimzadeh Abstract Mountain Livelihoods in Transition: Constraints and Opportunities in Kinnaur, Western Himalaya by Aghaghia Rahimzadeh Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Louise P. Fortmann, Chair This dissertation investigates the transformation of the district of Kinnaur in the state of Himachal Pradesh in the Indian Himalaya. I examine Kinnauri adaptation to political, economic, environmental, and social events of the last seven decades, including state intervention, market integration, and climate change. Broadly, I examine drivers of change in Kinnaur, and the implications of these changes on social, cultural, political, and environmental dynamics of the district. Based on findings from 11 months of ethnographic field work, I argue that Kinnaur’s transformation and current economic prosperity have been chiefly induced by outside forces, creating a temporary landscape of opportunity. State-led interventions including land reform and a push to supplement subsistence agriculture with commercial horticulture initiated a significant agrarian transition beginning with India’s Independence. I provide detailed examination of the Nautor Land Rules of 1968 and the 1972 Himachel Pradesh Ceiling of Land Holding Act, and their repercussion on land allocation to landless Kinnauris.
  • Environment Assessment and Management Framework

    Environment Assessment and Management Framework

    - Draft - Himachal Pradesh Forests for Prosperity Project Environment Assessment & Management Framework Submitted By Himachal Pradesh Forests Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, India Prepared By G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment & Sustainable Development, Himachal Regional Centre, Mohal - Kullu - 175 126, Himachal Pradesh SEPTEMBER , 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables: ...................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1 Introduction to the Proposed Project ................................................................................. 16 1.1 Background to the HP FPP project .............................................................................................. 16 1.2 Project development objective (PDO) ........................................................................................ 19 1.3 Project Beneficiaries ................................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Detailed Description of
  • An Assessment of Apple Cultivation in Kalpa, Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh

    An Assessment of Apple Cultivation in Kalpa, Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh

    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 20, Issue 8, Ver. II (Aug. 2015), PP 20-23 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org An Assessment of Apple Cultivation in Kalpa, Kinnaur District, Himachal Pradesh Gourab Bera (Research Scholar, Dept. of Geography, University of Calcutta) I. Introduction Apple (Maluspumila) is commercially the most important temperate fruit and is the fourth produced in the world after banana, orange and grape. About 70 million tons of apples were grown worldwide in 2013, and China produced almost half of this total. The United States is the second-leading producer with more than 6% of world production. Turkey is the third largest producer, followed by Italy, India and Poland. The area under apple cultivation in India increased by 24% from 1.95 lakh hectors. In 1991-92 to 2.42 lakh hectors. In 2001-02, although production increased by less than 1% (i.e. from 11 to 12 lakh tones). It is mostly grown in the states of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland. Apple belt of the Himachal is the most important crop, accounting for about 90% of the total horticultural production. Study area Himachal Pradesh is one of the ideal locations for apple cultivation, covering the districts of Shimla, Siramour, Kullu, Mandi, Chamba and Kinnaur considering the vast production of apple orchards. The much- awaited delicious variety of apples from Himachal Pradesh's Kalpa (Kinnaur district) where horticulture is considered as a major livelihood source, most of all the households are involved in horticulture activity.
  • History : Project Deepak

    History : Project Deepak

    HISTORY : PROJECT DEEPAK 1. Raising & Early History. Project Deepak was raised in May 1961 with Col S N Punjh as Chief Engineer, primarily for the construction of Hindustan-Tibet (H-T) Road. The H-T Road is one of the most difficult roads ever to have been constructed in India. The 76 Km long Pooh-Kaurik sector of H-T Road passes through considerable lengths of sheer vertical hard rock stretches and huge bouldery strata embedded in sand and non-cohesive material, which is inherently unstable. The sector runs along the River Satluj crossing it at several locations. The road runs at altitudes between 1600 to 3600 meters. On the whole, the terrain and climatic conditions are very uncongenial. Many valuable lives were lost during the construction of this road. Thus, this work is a testimony to the sheer grit, determination and perseverance shown by PROJECT DEEPAK right from its early days. The subsequent major events in the history of Project Deepak include:- (a) In 1965, construction of the 122 Km long Road Dhami-Basantpur-Kiongal and 107 Km long stretch of Road Keylong-Sarchu (part of the Manali-Leh road) was entrusted to PROJECT DEEPAK. (b) In December 1966, following disbandment of Project Chetak, all roads of Uttaranchal were taken over by PROJECT DEEPAK. Thus, the 300 Km long Road Rishikesh –Joshimath-Mana, 63 Km long road Road Joshimath-Malari and 260 Km long Road Tanakpur-Askote-Tawaghat came under PROJECT DEEPAK. (c) The early seventies saw Project Deepak spreading its light (Deepak Jyoti) in the states of Rajasthan and even Punjab.
  • Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes Over Himachal Pradesh State

    Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes Over Himachal Pradesh State

    CLIMATE RESEARCH AND SERVICES INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES PUNE Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes over Himachal Pradesh State Met Monograph No.: ESSO/IMD/HS/Rainfall Variability/10(2020)/34 Pulak Guhathakurta, Nitin Narkhede, Preetha Menon, Ashwini Kumar Prasad and Neha Sangwan GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT Met Monograph No.: ESSO/IMD/HS/Rainfall Variability/10(2020)/34 Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes Over Himachal Pradesh State Pulak Guhathakurta, Nitin Narkhede, Preetha Menon, Ashwini Kumar Prasad and Neha Sangwan INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT PUNE - 411005 1 DOCUMENT AND DATA CONTROL SHEET 1 Document Title Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes Over Himachal Pradesh State 2 Issue No. ESSO/IMD/HS/Rainfall Variability/10(2020)/34 3 Issue Date January 2020 4 Security Unclassified Classification 5 Control Status Uncontrolled 6 Document Type Scientific Publication 7 No. of Pages 27 8 No. of Figures 42 9 No. of References 3 10 Distribution Unrestricted 11 Language English 12 Authors Pulak Guhathakurta, Nitin Narkhede, Preetha Menon, Ashwini Kumar Prasad and Neha Sangwan 13 Originating Climate Research Division/ Climate Application & Division/ Group User Interface Group/ Hydrometeorology 14 Reviewing and Director General of Meteorology, India Approving Meteorological Department, New Delhi Authority 15 End users Central and State Ministries of Water resources, agriculture and civic bodies, Science and Technology, Disaster Management Agencies, Planning Commission of India 16 Abstract India is in the tropical monsoon zone and receives plenty of rainfall as most of the annual rainfall during the monsoon season every year. However, the rainfall is having high temporal and spatial variability and due to the impact of climate changes there are significant changes in the mean rainfall pattern and their variability as well as in the intensity and frequencies of extreme rainfall events.
  • Forest Department

    Forest Department

    GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Forest Department Integrated Project for Source Sustainability and Climate Resilient Rain-fed Agriculture The World Bank Assisted Environmental and Social Assessment Environmental and Social Management Framework Final Report 26 December 2019 Project Management Unit Integrated Project for Source Sustainability and Climate Resilient Rain-fed Agriculture Solan, Himachal Pradesh Government of Himachal Pradesh – Forest Department Integrated Project for Source Sustainability and Climate Resilient Rain-fed Agriculture ESA, ESMF and ESMP – Final Report 26 December 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 9 1. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 19 2. Environment and Social Assessment ............................................................................... 25 3. Legal and Policy Framework ........................................................................................... 33 4. Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement ............................................................................ 58 5. Environmental and Socio-Economic Baseline ................................................................. 67 6. Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts ................................................................ 121 7. Environment and Social Mitigation and Management Plan (Environmental Social Management
  • Highlights Itinerary

    Highlights Itinerary

    Season 2019-20 SPITI 29 Sept - 6 Oct Backup vehicle I Paramedic I Mechanic I Spares Rs. 15,000 / person. Including taxes. Total seats: 20 Registration link: https://www.gio.in/bajaj-flg-ride-payment Ride across the cold desert mountain valley of Himachal, where Spiti's postcard villages await you. Take off from Chandigarh and make your way through varied terrains of Spiti, soak-in the timeless beauty of the monasteries, conquer the breath-taking height of the place called The Middle Land in its full glory, and Feel Like God. ITINERARY # Date Day Start point Start time Via End point End time Distance Riding hours 1 29-Sep Sunday Chandigarh 6:00 AM Shimla Narkanda 6:00 PM 270 9 2 30-Sep Monday Narkanda 6:00 AM Sangla 4:00 PM 155 8 Sangla, Kalpa, Pangi, 3 01-Oct Tuesday Sangla 6:00 AM Nako Tabo 4:00 PM 200 8 Dhankar lake (trek), Hikkim monastery, 4 02-Oct Wednesday Tabo 10:00 AM Koumik village, Langza Kaza 5:00 PM 100 4 Key Monastery, Kaza, Ki, Kibber, Gette, 5 03-Oct Thursday Kaza 10:00 AM Tashigang Kaza 5:00 PM 50 4 6 04-Oct Friday Kaza 6:00 AM Kalpa 4:00 PM 200 8 7 05-Oct Saturday Kalpa 6:00 AM Shimla 4:00 PM 225 8 8 06-Oct Sunday Shimla 9:00 AM Jakhu hill Chandigarh 3:00 PM 220 7 TRIP INCLUSIONS TRIP EXCLUSIONS RIDING GEAR MANDATORY - Accommodation on triple sharing basis in a - Petrol expenses of riders - A good condition riding helmet and shoes for both rider campsite/guesthouse/hotel - depending upon availability - Any meal or service not mentioned and pillion - All breakfast and dinners only, starting from breakfast on - Bottled water, soft drinks, liquor, cocktail snacks, etc - Knee and elbow Guards Day 1 till last breakfast of the ride - Any entry fee for monument visits, parking charges, etc - Riding Gloves - Morning & evening tea/coffee with cookies is also included - Any charges for activities not mentioned here - Any costs arising out of unforeseen circumstances like SUGGESTED landslides, road blocks, bad weather, expenses - Protective jackets & pants, waterproof clothes and incurred on account of sickness, etc.
  • A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lahul Valley, Himachal Pradesh

    A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lahul Valley, Himachal Pradesh

    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2019-006 A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lahul Valley, Himachal Pradesh Brad Chamberlain and Wendy Chamberlain A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lahul Valley, Himachal Pradesh Brad Chamberlain and Wendy Chamberlain SIL International® 2019 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2019-006, August 2019 © 2019 SIL International® All rights reserved Data and materials collected by researchers in an era before documentation of permission was standardized may be included in this publication. SIL makes diligent efforts to identify and acknowledge sources and to obtain appropriate permissions wherever possible, acting in good faith and on the best information available at the time of publication. Abstract The main purpose of this survey of the Lahul Valley of Himachal Pradesh was to determine the best language varieties for communicating with the Lahuli people. The survey was conducted in June, July, and August of 1996. The survey was divided into three studies: a language and dialect area study; a language use, attitudes, and vitality study; and a bilingualism study. Wordlists were collected for the Pattani language, which is the largest language group in Lahul. Recorded Text Testing was used. Oral questionnaires were the means to study language use, attitudes and vitality. Self-reported levels of bilingualism in Hindi were assessed through questionnaires, informal interviews, and observation. In addition, a test based on the Recorded Text Testing procedure was used to see if minority language groups of Lahul could understand the most widely spoken Lahuli language, Pattani. Although Lahul Valley is home to only 20,000 residents, there are seven mother tongue languages: Pattani, Gahri, Tinani, Bhoti, Lohari, Chinali and Pangi.
  • MOUNTAIN and LOWLAND LINKAGES: a CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVE in the HIMALAYAS About IHCAP

    MOUNTAIN and LOWLAND LINKAGES: a CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVE in the HIMALAYAS About IHCAP

    SCIENCE BRIEF: MOUNTAIN AND LOWLAND LINKAGES: A CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVE IN THE HIMALAYAS About IHCAP The Indian Himalayas Climate Adaptation Programme (IHCAP) is a project under the Global Programme Climate Change and Environment (GPCCE) of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and is being implemented in partnership with the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India. IHCAP is supporting the implementation of the National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem (NMSHE) as a knowledge and technical partner. The overall goal of IHCAP is to strengthen the resilience of vulnerable communities in the Himalayas and to enhance and connect the knowledge and capacities of research institutions, communities and decision-makers. Published by IHCAP Authors: Simon Allen, Divya Mohan, Markus Stoffel, Mustafa Ali Khan, Janine Kuriger, Nadine Salzmann, Shirish Sinha Copyediting: Shimpy Khurana Photo Credits: Prashanth Vishwanathan/IHCAP Copyright © IHCAP 2017. All Rights Reserved. Published in India This science brief or parts of it may not be reproduced, stored by means of any system or transmitted, in any form or by any medium, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or of any other type, without the prior permission of IHCAP. This science brief is available in the electronic form at: http://www.ihcap.in/resources.html SCIENCE BRIEF: MOUNTAIN AND LOWLAND LINKAGES: A CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVE IN THE HIMALAYAS INTRODUCTION Mountain environments around the world are often considered to be amongst the most sensitive to the impacts of climate change. Rapidly changing snow and ice cover and changes in mountain ecosystems are indicative of the impact of humans on the climate system.
  • Contact Detail of SSO DSO & Deos

    Contact Detail of SSO DSO & Deos

    Postal Address PIN Name of Coordinator S.No. State Districts Unit Region Cell No. Tel No. Data Manager Data Entry operator Code (SSO/DSO) Directorate of Health Services, SDA Ms. Meenakshi (9418962903) Himachal State Surveillance 129 Shimla Complex, Block No.-6 , IDSP Section, 171009 North Dr. Rajesh Guleri 9418479613 1772624105 NA Ms. Sandhira (9418016784) (Off. Tel. 0177- Pradesh Unit Room No. 410, Kasumpti, Shimla-171009 2628046) IDSP Cell,C/o CMO Office Bilaspur, Bhawana Gupta (9459507598) Ms. Himachal District Surveillance 130 Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh. Pin 174001 North Dr. Bhardwaj 9418485259 01978-221988 NA Bindia (9418088802) (Off. Pradesh Unit code 174001 01978221988) IDSP Cell, C/o Chief Medical Officer Himachal District Surveillance Ms. Ranisha (9418277794) Sh, 131 Chamba Chamba, District Chamba , Himachal 176310 North Dr. Y.D. Sharma 01899-224865 NA Pradesh Unit 9418105406 PanKaj (8894111253) Pradesh, Pind code 176310 IDSP Cell, C/o Chief Medical Officer Sh. Manjeet Singh (9459081835) Sh. Himachal District Surveillance Hamirpur, District hamirpur , Himachal 132 Hamirpur 177001 North Dr. P.K. Katwal 01972-222403 NA Manupreet thakur (9418499925) (off. Pradesh Unit Pradesh. Pin Code 177001 9816050300 01972-221837) IDSP Cell, C/o Chief Medical Officer Himachal District Surveillance kangra at Dharamshala District Kangra , 133 Kangra 176215 North Dr. R.K. Sood 9418064677 01892-224370 NA Sh. Ajay Kumar (9418041737) Pradesh Unit Himachal Pradesh. Pin Code 176215. Himachal State Health Institute Kasouli 134 Kasauli State Health Institute North NA NA NIL Pradesh Regional Hospital, Keylong, Himachal District Sh. Sunil Kumar (9418776116) 135 Keylong Block Lahaul, Distt. Lahaul & 175132 North Dr. S.S. Pujara 9418456023 01900-222948 NA Pradesh Surveillance Unit Spiti Ms.
  • Final Population Totals, Series-7 , Himachal Pradesh

    Final Population Totals, Series-7 , Himachal Pradesh

    CENSlUJS OF ~NDIA 1971 SERIES-7 HIMACHAL I?IRADIESH Paper I of 1972 IF~NAl IPOIPUlATION TOTALS ATTAR SI::-.JGH of the indian Administrative S('fviel! Direc(nr nj Census Operations, Himachal Pradesh CO~TENTS PUf5( s PRHAC[ ii FIGURES A I A GLANCE iii A BRIEF A ,\ALySI~ or "j HE RJ:sl:LTS I. Size. DI ... trihution and Growth of Population ') Density of PopUlation 3. Urbani~ation I 4. Sl.:heduled Caste and SCheduled Tribe Population 2 5. Religion 3 TABlr 1 Di::.tribution of Population and Growth Rate 4 TABLL 2 Comparatiw Growth Rates 1951 -61 and 1961 71 4 TABLF 3 Densit) of Population 5 TABLE 4 1;rbanisation-Comparative Study 1961 and 1971 TARLE 5 Di::.tribution of Scheduled Caste'> and Scheduled Tribe:, and their respective Growth Rate'>- ]961 71 6 TARIX 6 Religion-Comparative Study- 1961 and 1971 with Growth Rate~ " 6 TARLF 7 1971 Census-Population by Sex and Scheduled Ca~tes and SCheduled Tribes- -State and Districts 8 TABI F 8 1971 Census -Population by Scheduled Ca:,tes and Scheduled Tribes Districts. Tehsih/Sub- Tehsil" and Town~!Urban Areas 9 (i) to' ".I I HIMACHAL PRADESH , Admmistrative DIvIsions .~.(, ..... 1971 ~>~ ~,. ...... ) " ... _.... I, / '- \ \", ( ... ·-· ...r \ I I \ ~'l, / r ~ KEYLONG ~ ... ., ,- ,.' ~- f_ 1 -' I '\ o ... ICANGRA L _, ." ..... ,: .f- A N\G. A \ \. \ ~\_ .. " \. I i. " 0 " , ... 1.<8 G ' \:IOU,",o"_v INTl!,H>4 ..T!OWA.l._._._. Sl"T( __ ~_.,_ ... _._ ._._ O·SHIICTS _ ..•.• _ __._ T[H~ L Ist)a-T£ ... 51t. ...... ~ ••.• ,_ Ht ..
  • MODULE –XVI CHAPTER – II, Section – 4 ( B ) (Xvi ) the Names

    MODULE –XVI CHAPTER – II, Section – 4 ( B ) (Xvi ) the Names

    MODULE –XVI CHAPTER – II, Section – 4 ( b ) (xvi ) The names, designation and other particulars of the Public Authority, Appellate Authorities and Public Information Officers are as under : - Sr. Designation of officers Jurisdiction / Units under their control No 1. Shri Rohit Jamwal (HAS) Elementary Education Department in H.P. Public Authority-Cum-Director 2. Shri Hitesh Azad (HAS) 1st Appellate Authority of the Elementary Joint Director (Admn)-Cum- Education Department in respect of all Appellate Authority Deputy Director of Ele. Education/ Principal DIETs in H.P. 3. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. (PIO-I) State Public Information Officers (State) at Shri Roshan Lal Directorate of Ele. Edu. H.P. Shimla-1. 4. Asstt. Director of Ele. Edu. (PIO-II) State Public Information Officers (State) at Smt. Monika Gupta, Asstt. Director. Directorate of Ele. Edu. H.P. Shimla-1. APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AT DISTRICT LEVEL 1. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Bilaspur, District Public Information Officer for his office as Bilapur well as their district and 1st. Appellate Authority for their Educations Blocks. 2. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Chamba, District ---do--- Chamba 3. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Hamirpur, ---do--- District Hamirpur 4. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Kullu, District ---do--- Kullu 5. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Kinnaur, District ---do--- Kinnaur 6. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Kangra, District ---do--- Kangra 7. Dy. Director of Higher Edu. Keylong ---do--- District Lahual & Spiti. 8. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Mandi, District ---do--- Mandi. 9. Dy. Director of Ele. Edu. Shimla, District ---do--- Shimla 10. Dy. Director of Ele.