Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2008 Faculty of Science University of Ostrava Annual Report 2008 May 2009 Contact address: Faculty of Science University of Ostrava 30. dubna 22 CZ 701 03 Ostrava Czech Republic Phone: +420 597 092 100 WWW: http://prf.osu.cz/ 1 2 Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008 Faculty of Science University of Ostrava Editor: Petr Šaloun Copy Editor: Beáta Sklářová Translation: Jana Klimánková Cover designer: Pavel Noga Published by: University of Ostrava First Edition Printed by: Repronis s. r. o. © 2009, Dana Kričfaluši, Petr Šaloun, Petra Konečná, Iveta Nevludová ISBN 978-80-7368-457-0 2 1 Contents 1 CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3 FACULTY MANAGEMENT BODIES..................................................................................................... 9 3.1 ORGANIZATION CHART......................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 ACADEMIC SENATE OF THE FACULTY ................................................................................................. 10 3.3 ORGANIZATION DIAGRAM OF THE DEAN’S OFFICE ............................................................................. 11 3.4 DEAN’S OFFICE BOARD ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.5 DEAN’S OFFICE ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 SCIENTIFIC BOARD OF THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE............................................................................... 14 4 STUDY........................................................................................................................................................ 15 4.1 ADMISSION PROCEDURE STATISTICS................................................................................................... 15 4.2 NEW STUDY PROGRAMMES AND FIELDS OF STUDY ............................................................................ 21 4.3 STUDENT RESEARCH CONFERENCES AND COMPETITIONS................................................................... 22 5 ERASMUS.................................................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 TEACHER’S MOBILITY UNDER THE ERASMUS PROGRAMME............................................................. 25 5.2 SOCRATES – ARION, COMENIUS, GRUNDTVIG ............................................................................... 26 5.3 STUDENTS MOBILITY DURING THE YEAR 2008 ................................................................................... 26 5.4 LIST OF BILATERAL AGREEMENTS – LLP– ERASMUS PROGRAMME ................................................ 28 6 RESEARCH PROGRAMMES................................................................................................................. 31 6.1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS (FACULTY).......................................................................................... 31 6.2 SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS (DEPARTMENTS) ................................................................................. 31 7 FACULTY SERVICE ............................................................................................................................... 35 7.1 THE LIBRARIES AND DEPOSITORY AND READING ROOMS OF FACULTY OF SCIENCE........................... 35 8 CENTRE FOR LIFELONG EDUCATION ............................................................................................ 39 9 PROJECT RESEARCH AND ASSISTANCE DEPARTMENT........................................................... 41 10 INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT....................................................................... 43 10.1 STAFF.................................................................................................................................................. 43 10.2 EQUIPMENT......................................................................................................................................... 43 10.3 CONTACTS AND COOPERATION ........................................................................................................... 43 10.4 MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .............................................................................. 44 10.5 PUBLICATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 44 11 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS................................................................................................... 45 11.1 STAFF.................................................................................................................................................. 45 11.2 PHD. STUDENTS .................................................................................................................................. 46 11.3 STUDY PROGRAMMES ......................................................................................................................... 47 11.4 THESES................................................................................................................................................ 48 11.5 RESEARCH PROJECTS .......................................................................................................................... 49 11.6 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ................................................................................................................... 49 11.7 EQUIPMENT......................................................................................................................................... 49 11.8 CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS............................................................................................................ 50 11.9 CONTACTS AND COOPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 50 11.10 STUDENT RESEARCH ACTIVITY........................................................................................................... 51 11.11 MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS............................................................................... 52 11.12 PUBLICATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 52 12 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS ................................................................................................................ 55 3 4 Annual Report 2008 12.1 STAFF ..................................................................................................................................................55 12.2 PHD. STUDENTS...................................................................................................................................56 12.3 STUDY PROGRAMMES .........................................................................................................................57 12.4 THESES................................................................................................................................................58 12.5 RESEARCH PROJECTS ..........................................................................................................................59 12.6 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS....................................................................................................................60 12.7 EQUIPMENT .........................................................................................................................................60 12.8 CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS............................................................................................................61 12.9 CONTACTS AND COOPERATION ...........................................................................................................61 12.10 STUDENT RESEARCH ACTIVITY...........................................................................................................62 12.11 MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS...............................................................................62 12.12 PUBLICATIONS.....................................................................................................................................63 13 DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATICS AND COMPUTERS .................................................................65 13.1 STAFF ..................................................................................................................................................65 13.2 PHD. STUDENTS ..................................................................................................................................66 13.3 STUDY PROGRAMMES .........................................................................................................................67 13.4 THESES................................................................................................................................................68 13.5 RESEARCH PROJECTS ..........................................................................................................................72 13.6 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS....................................................................................................................72
Recommended publications
  • Univerzita Hradec Králové Filozofická Fakulta Diplomová
    Univerzita Hradec Králové Filozofická fakulta Diplomová práce 2016 Bc. Dominika Janáková Univerzita Hradec Králové Filozofická fakulta Katedra pomocných věd historických a archivnictví Plebiscitní úřady na Těšínsku, Oravě a Spiši v letech 1918-1920 Diplomová práce Autor: Dominika Janáková Studijní program: B 7105 Historické vědy Studijní obor: Archivnictví Forma studia: prezenční Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Petr Grulich, PhD. Hradec Králové, 2016 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto diplomovou práci vypracovala (pod vedením vedoucího diplomové práce doc. Mgr. Petra Grulicha, PhD.) samostatně a uvedla jsem všechny použité prameny a literaturu. V Hradci Králové, dne 5. 6. 2016 Anotace JANÁKOVÁ, DOMINIKA. Plebiscitní úřady na Těšínsku, Oravě a Spiši v letech 1918-1920. Hradec Králové : Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Hradec Králové, 2016, 151 stran. Diplomová práce. Diplomová práce se zabývá československými úřady, které vznikly na území Těšínského Slezska, Oravy a Spiše po rozhodnutí Nejvyšší rady o vykonání plebiscitu. Československo i Polsko si od podzimu 1918 nárokovalo území Těšínska, Oravy a Spiše a spor obou států vyvrcholil v lednu 1919 tzv. sedmidenní válkou. Jelikož se Polsko s Československem nedokázaly přátelsky dohodnout, na sporném území měl proběhnout plebiscit – lid si měl sám zvolit, v jakém státě chce žít. Vládu nad plebiscitním územím 3. února 1920 převzala Mezinárodní komise složená ze zástupců dohodových mocností, která správně rozdělila Těšínsko na západní a východní prefekturu. Západní prefektura, v jejímž čele stanul prefekt, který přímo podléhal Mezinárodní komisi, spadala pod československou správu. Při Mezinárodní komisi vznikl Úřad delegáta republiky československé. Československá delegace úzce spolupracovala s komisí na přípravě plebiscitu a správě území. V květnu 1920 byla ustanovena Mezinárodní subkomise pro Oravu a Spiš a pro spolupráci s ní vznikl samostatný Úřad subdelegáta.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Dwelling Pygmy Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) in Southeast Asian Tropical Freshwater Swamp Forest Prefer Wet Microhabitats
    Research Article M.K. TAN, H. YEO AND JournalW.S. HWANG of Orthoptera Research 2017, 26(1): 73-8073 Ground dwelling pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) in Southeast Asian tropical freshwater swamp forest prefer wet microhabitats MING KAI TAN1, HUIQING YEO2, WEI SONG HWANG3,1 1 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore. 2 Environment Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 138667, Republic of Singapore. 3 Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore 117377, Republic of Singapore. Corresponding author: M. K. Tan ([email protected]) Academic editor: Corinna Bazelet | Received 26 March 2017 | Accepted 29 May 2017 | Published 28 June 2017 http://zoobank.org/1C923552-96E1-4ED7-98F0-C77E60C2BD17 Citation: Tan MK, Yeo H, Hwang WS (2017) Ground dwelling pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) in Southeast Asian tropical freshwater swamp forest prefer wet microhabitats. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26(1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14551 Abstract 2014, Pincebourde and Casas 2015, Thom and Daniels 2017). Likewise, orthopterans have associations with vegetation and mi- Tetrigidae are an ancient group of grasshoppers and, similar to many crohabitat conditions (Joern 1982, Badenhausser et al. 2015). other insects, have associations and preferences for specific microhabitats Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets and katydids) are among and habitats. The ecology of pygmy grasshoppers in Southeast Asia the largest group of terrestrial insects, comprising more than is generally under studied, especially in threatened habitats such as freshwater swamp forests. A study in Nee Soon Swamp forest, Singapore, 27,000 described species (Cigliano et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies
    Environmental & Socio-economic Studies DOI: 10.1515/environ-2015-0044 Environ. Socio.-econ. Stud., 2014, 2, 4: 1-12 © 2014 Copyright by University of Silesia ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reclamation of devastated landscape in the Karviná region (Czech Republic) Jan Havrlant, Ludĕk Krtička Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho Str. 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic E–mail address: [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The article deals with the recent positive changes in the industrial landscape of the Karviná region in a broader context. The Karviná region has been the most important part of the coal-bearing Ostrava-Karviná District. Since the industrial revolution, the position of the primary mining area has brought a dynamic economic development and a great concentration of population into the fast-growing conurbation cities, particularly between 1950s and 1980s. However, the dominant coal mining and processing has had a negative impact on the environment, the character and utilization of the landscape. Many environmental, socioeconomic and other problems did not become fully evident until the social changes at the turn of 1980s and 1990s. At present, a great attention is being paid to the reclamation of the affected landscape. As a result, the region is starting to change its unflattering image of an industrial and problematic area devastated by coal extraction for the better after many years. The various forms of land reclamation, modification of water bodies, construction of new sports and recreational facilities and so on are bringing a gradual improvement of the environment in the region, creating a new cultivated landscape that can be used, among other things, for various forms of tourism and relaxation.
    [Show full text]
  • Zadyszana, Grapowa Droga Na Istebnę
    A w górę na południe - lasy, łany zgrzebne - zadyszana, grapowa droga na Istebnę - Bielsko - Skoczów - i wyżej - aż tam do Cieszyna Zielna, kwietna, radością pachnąca kraina ów odblaskiem cienistym górnie wymodrzony wstęży się i spagórza zwinnie Śląsk Zielony... Emil Zegadłowicz - „Pieśń o Śląsku” spis treści | obsah | contents 04 - Agroturystyka i turystyka miejska | Agroturistika a městská turistika | Agritourism and urban tourism 10 - Turystyka krajoznawcza | Vlastivědná turistika | Sightseeing tourism 16 - Turystyka przyrodnicza i poznawcza | Turistika v přírodě a poznávací turistika | Wildlife and educational tourism 22 - Turystyka wypoczynkowa i aktywna | Rekreační a aktivní turistika | Leisure and active tourism 28 - Turystyka uzdrowiskowa i kulturowa | Lázeňská a kulturní turistika | Spa and cultural tourism 34 - Turystyka na Szlaku Kraków - Morawy - Wiedeń Greenways | Turistická stezka Kraków - Morava - Wien Greenways | Tourism on the trail Cracow - Moravia - Vienna Greenways – 3 – Agroturystyka i turystyka miejska | Agroturistika a městská turistika | Agritourism and urban tourism Agroturystyka i turystyka miejska to produkt turystyczny, który Agroturistika a městská turistika je turistický produkt, který je The tourist product called Agritourism and urban tourism is skierowany jest do klienta indywidualnego i umożliwia poznanie adresován individuálnímu klientovi a umožňuje poznat nejzajímavější directed to an individual tourist. It gives an opportunity to visit najciekawszych miejsc związanych z bogactwem tradycji, kultury, místa spojená s kulturním a přírodním bohatstvím, tradicemi interesting historical places of great scenic beauty which are famous zabytków i przyrody znajdujących się na terenie Cieszyna, Skoczowa a památkami nacházejícími se na území Cieszyna, Skoczowa a obcí for their monuments, culture, tradition as well as amazing nature. oraz gmin: Goleszów i Dębowiec. Został on podzielony na dwie Goleszów a Dębowiec.
    [Show full text]
  • Pravěká Minulost Bruntálu a Jeho Horského Okolí1
    ČASOPIS SLEZSKÉHO ZEMSKÉHO MUZEA SÉRIE B, 64/2015 Vratislav J a n á k – Petr R a t a j PRAVĚKÁ MINULOST BRUNTÁLU A JEHO HORSKÉHO OKOLÍ1 Abstract In terms of natural conditions the mountain part of the Bruntál district fundamentally differs from the North- Eastern part – Krnov and Osoblaha regions. They are part of the traditional settlement area on the fertile soils of the Upper Silesian loess, with characteristics similar to Central Europe regions - with a few exceptions – i.e. continuity of a relatively dense settlement based on agriculture since the beginning of Neolith in the 6th millen- nium BC until today. The wooded mountain surroundings of Bruntál are regions where continuous settlement started much later, sometimes – as in this case – as late as in the High Middle Ages. If there was an earlier set- tlement, it can be described as sparse and discontinuous in time and space, and with non-agricultural priorities - the main motives of their establishment and episodic existence were apparently communications, exploitation of mineral resources and non-agricultural use of forests. We have no reliable evidence of settlement in the Bruntál region and up to now the archaeologic finds have suggested mere penetration. Most common are iso- lated discoveries of stone industry. Part of them form something like a rim at the very edge of the mountain re- gion and are probably connected with the activities of the lowlands population in the vicinity; the rest suggests penetration into the heart of Jeseníky. Isolated finds from the mountains include coins and metal objects from the Roman era and the beginning of the Migration Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Changes in the Central Part of the Karviná Region from the First Half of the 19Th Century to the Beginning of the 21St Century
    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 31, No. 1, p. 75–91, 2012 doi:10.4149/ekol_2012_01_75 LANDSCAPE CHANGES IN THE CENTRAL PART OF THE KARVINÁ REGION FROM THE FIRST HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY TO THE BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY MONIKA MULKOVÁ1, PETR POPELKA2, RENATA POPELKOVÁ1 1 Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava – Slezská Ostrava, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Department of History, Faculty of Arts, University of Ostrava, Reální 5, Ostrava, Czech Republic; e-mail: Petr. [email protected] Abstract Mulková M., Popelka P., Popelková R.: Landscape changes in the central part of the Karviná region from the first half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 21st century. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 31, No. 1, p. 75–91, 2012. This study deals with the impact of industrialization on the landscape in the Ostrava-Karviná Mining District. The authors focused on the analysis of the landscape changes in the central part of the Karv- iná region from the first half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 21st century. Land cover and land cover development were analyzed in detail in the observed cadastral areas of Lazy near Orlová, Karviná-Doly, and Darkov. With regard to the existing data sources, the years 1836, 1947 and 2003 were selected as significant time milestones. Landscape changes derived from the image data sources of cadastral maps and aerial photos are explained in historical contexts related to the selected areas. Key
    [Show full text]
  • Bryum Argenteum 4 21.1 6 35.3 10 27.8 Bryum Caespiticum 15 78.9 17 100 32 88.9 Ceratodon Purpureus 6 31.6 7 41.2 13 36.1 Fig 2: Habitat of T
    INTRODUCTION Tetrigidae (groundhoppers) are small, short-horned Orthoptera with an elongated pronotum, which covers the abdomen and hind wings (Kočárek et al. 2005). Generally, Tetrigidae belong to the least- studied groups of Orthoptera (Hochkirch et al. 2006), when especially their ecological preferences and food biology is almost unknown. Tetrigidae are known to feed on algae, lichens, mosses, small plants and detritus, but there are published only a few concrete data about their food biology (Podgornaya 1983, Paranjape et al. 1987). In some species, as Tetrix ceperoi (Bolivar, 1887), the food preferences has not yet been studied in detail. We carried out a preliminary analysis of the food composition by the dissection of the alimentary tract contents of T. ceperoi. Tab. 1. Frequencye of the moss species in the gut content of T. ceperoi individuals Fig 1: T. ceperoi is a West-Mediterranean species, which reaches the north- eastern edge of its range in Central Europe. In the Czech Republic, the species has been reported for the first time in 2002 (Holuša & Holuša 2002) and up to now we know only few localities in southern Moravia. T. ceperoi is Number of T. ceperoi specimens restricted to damp, warm habitats, such as dune valleys, sand pits or heath Σ(ind. ponds in the territory of the Czech Republic Moss species ♂(ind.) ♂(%) ♀(ind.) ♀(%) ) Σ(%) Barbula sp. (B. convoluta or/and B. unguiculata) 6 31.6 6 35.3 12 33.3 Bryum argenteum 4 21.1 6 35.3 10 27.8 Bryum caespiticum 15 78.9 17 100 32 88.9 Ceratodon purpureus 6 31.6 7 41.2 13 36.1 Fig 2: Habitat of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistics and Ecology of the Grasshoppers and Crickets (Saltatoria) of the Dunes Along the Belgian Coast
    Faunistics and ecology of the grasshoppers and crickets (Saltatoria) of the dunes along the Belgian coast by Kris DECLEER & Hendrik DEVRIESE Abstract Hitherto a total number of 23 species were recorded in the coastal dune area; this is about half of the Belgian Saltatoria fauna. Despite the overall deterioration of the former semi-natural dune landscape during the past decades, still 18 species were found after 1980. The actual presence of 3 additional species needs confirmation. Three species seem to have become extinct: Decticus verrucivorus, Gryllus campestris and Mecostethus grossus. Both in a Flemish and Belgian perspective, the coastal dunes still form a stronghold for several rare species, e.g. Conocephalus disco/or, Platycleis albopunctata, Tetrix ceperoi, Chorthippus albomarginatus and Oedipoda caerulescens. The importance of particular microclimatological conditions for the occurrence of most grasshoppers is stressed. The cessation in the beginning of the century of the agricultural practice of cattle grazing in the inner-dunes undoubtedly played an important role in the extinction process or the decrease of several species. An increased effort to remove considerable parts of dense scrub vegetations in former dune grasslands and the re-use of extensive grazing as a management practice can therefore strongly be recommended. Resume La faune des criquets et sauterelles (Saltatoria) du district des dunes littorales comprend 23 especes, soit environ la moitie de la faune belge. Malgre la deterioration complete des paysages semi-naturelles des dunes durant les dernieres decennies, 18 especes ont encore ete observees apres 1980. L'eventuelle presence de 3 autres especes doit etre confirmee. Trois especes peuvent etre considerees comme disparues: Decticus verrucivorus, Gryllus campestris et Mecostethus grossus.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CURRENT STATUS of ORTHOPTEROID INSECTS in BRITAIN and IRELAND by Peter G
    THE CURRENT STATUS OF ORTHOPTEROID INSECTS IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND by Peter G. Sutton, Björn C. Beckmann & Brian Nelson INTRODUCTION This article provides an overview of the changes that have occurred within the orthopteroid fauna of Britain and Ireland since the last distribution atlas was published in 1997 (Haes & Harding, 1997). It provides the current IUCN status of the scarce and threatened species in Britain in accordance with their recent reassessment (Sutton, 2015a) and discusses the future prognosis for this group of insects in Britain and Ireland. It also highlights recent developments of the Orthoptera Recording Scheme with particular reference to the collection of distribution map data using new technologies. Changes to the orthopteroid fauna of Britain and Ireland have been assessed in the landmark publications by Ragge (1965), Marshall & Haes (1988), Haes & Harding (1997) and more recently, Benton (2012), and have also been comprehensively reviewed by Marshall (1974, 2001, 2010). In addition, a regular and ongoing summary of these changes has been provided by the Grasshoppers and Relatives section of British Wildlife magazine (Haes, 1990‒1995; Widgery 1995‒2002; Sutton, 2002‒2016), and in the Orthoptera Recording Scheme newsletters (1‒22 (Haes, 1979‒1995); 23‒28 (Widgery, 1996‒2002) and 29‒33 (Beckmann & Sutton, 2013‒2016)). Field Cricket Gryllus campestris . Adult male at a West Sussex reintroduction site, 1 June 2013 (Photo: D. Browne). 6 Atropo s 59 www.atropos.info THE ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA The orthopteroid insects include some of the largest and most spectacular insects to be found in Britain and Ireland, such as the beautiful Large Marsh Grasshopper Stethophyma grossum .
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Äcridoidea) Aus Der Südlichen Mark Brandenburg 53-64 Brandenburgische Ent
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Brandenburgische Entomologische Nachrichten Jahr/Year: 1997 Band/Volume: 4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Landeck Ingmar Artikel/Article: Über drei bemerkenswerte Heuschreckenarten (Orthoptera: Äcridoidea) aus der südlichen Mark Brandenburg 53-64 Brandenburgische Ent. Nachr. P o tsd a m ISSN 0 9 4 3 - 6 7 6 6 4 (1 9 9 7 )1 S. 5 3 -6 4 14. Juli 1997 Über drei bemerkenswerte Heuschreekenarten (Orthoptera: Äcridoidea) aus der südlichen Mark Brandenburg I n g m a r L a n d e c k 1 Zusammenfassung. Seit 1990 wurden 40 Grillen- und Heuschreckenarten aus der Niederlausitz bekannt. Drei faunistisch interessante Arten werden hier besprochen. Erstmals wirdTetrix ceperoi (Bolivar) im Südteil Brandenburgs nachgewiesen. Einige morphometrische Merkmale werden beschrieben, um sie in gemischten Populationen vonT. subulata zu trennen. Chortippus pullus (Philippi) und Stenobothrus nigromaculatus (H errich-Schäffer) wurden lange als ausgestorben betrachtet. Die Vegeationsstruktur an den Fundstellen der drei Arten wird beschrieben und mit Literaturangaben verglichen. Abstract. Since 1990 about 40 species of crickets, bush-crickets and grasshoppers have been recorded from Lower Lusatica. Three species are of higher interest for faunistic analysis.Tetrix ceperoi (Bolivar) is recorded for first time in the southern part of Brandenburg. For this species some morphometric characters are given to separate it fromT. subulata in mixed populations.Chorthippus pullus (PHILIPPI) and Stenobothrus nigromaculatus (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER) have been considered to be extinct for a long time. The structure of vegetation found in habitats of all three species is described and compared with literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Overlap in Allotopic and Syntopic Populations of Sexually Interacting Ground-Hopper Species
    Insect Science (2012) 19, 391–402, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01462.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Niche overlap in allotopic and syntopic populations of sexually interacting ground-hopper species Axel Hochkirch1 and Julia Groning¨ 2 1Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Trier, 2University of Osnabruck,¨ Department of Biology/Chemistry, Division of Ecology, Osnabruck,¨ Germany Abstract There is accumulating evidence that sexual interactions among species (re- productive interference) could have dramatic effects for species’ coexistence. It has been shown that the fitness of individuals can be substantially reduced as a consequence of reproductive interference. This might subsequently lead to displacement of a species (sex- ual exclusion). On the other hand, some evolutionary and ecological mechanisms might enable species to coexist, such as the divergence of mate recognition systems (reproduc- tive character displacement), habitat partitioning, clumped dispersion patterns or different colonization capabilities. We have previously shown that the two ground-hopper species Tetrix subulata and Tetrix ceperoi interact sexually in the laboratory as well as in the field. At sites where both species co-occur niche overlap was high, suggesting that coexistence is maintained by different niche breadths rather than by habitat partitioning. To test the hy- pothesis that habitat partitioning does not contribute to species’ coexistence, we examined whether allotopic and syntopic populations of these two species differ in niche overlap (competitive release). Our results show that niche overlap is higher in syntopic than in allotopic populations, suggesting that the site-specific habitat structure (heterogeneity) has a stronger influence on microhabitat utilization than the presence of heterospecifics. Hence, our data do not support the hypothesis that habitat partitioning plays a substantial role for the coexistence of these sexually interacting species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Dorset Orthoptera and Allies
    CHECKLIST OF DORSET ORTHOPTERA & ALLIES v1.0 February 2019 Number of species recorded in the UK 40 Number of species recorded from Dorset 36 Number of species recorded from VC9 36 Number of species recorded since 1990 34 Number of species presumed extinct 2 Coverage of records for Orthoptera in Dorset Species richness map for Orthoptera in Dorset v1.0 February 2019 The Checklist ORTHOPTERA Tettigoniidae Phaneroptera falcata Sickle-bearing Bush-cricket Leptophyes punctatissima Speckled Bush-cricket Meconema thalassinum Oak Bush-cricket Meconema meridionale Southern Oak Bush-cricket Conocephalus discolor Long-winged Conehead Conocephalus dorsalis Short-winged Conehead Ruspolia nitidula Large Conehead Tettigonia viridissima Great Green Bush-cricket [Decticus verrucivorus Wart Biter]1 EN Platycleis albopunctata Grey Bush-cricket NS Metrioptera brachyptera Bog Bush-cricket NS Metrioptera roeselii Roesel's Bush-cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera Dark Bush-cricket Gryllidae Acheta domestica House Cricket Nemobius sylvestris Wood Cricket NS Pseudomogoplistes vicentae Scaly Cricket VU Tetrigidae Tetrix ceperoi Cepero's Ground-hopper NS Tetrix subulata Slender Ground-hopper Tetrix undulata Common Ground-hopper Acrididae Stethophyma grossum Large Marsh Grasshopper NT Omocestus rufipes Woodland Grasshopper NS Omocestus viridulus Common Green Grasshopper Stenobothrus lineatus Stripe-Winged Grasshopper Gomphocerippus rufus Rufous Grasshopper NS Myrmeleotettix maculatus Mottled Grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus Common Field Grasshopper Chorthippus vagans Heath Grasshopper NT Chorthippus parallelus Meadow Grasshopper Chorthippus albomarginatus Lesser Marsh Grasshopper DICTYOPTERA Blattellidae Ectobius lapponicus Dusky Cockroach NS Ectobius pallidus Tawny Cockroach NS Ectobius panzeri Lesser Cockroach NS DERMAPTERA Labiidae Labia minor Lesser Earwig Forficulidae Forficula lesnei Lesne’s Earwig Forficula auricularia Common Earwig Labiduridae [Labidura riparia Giant Earwig]1 RE 1[ ] = species in brackets are considered extinct in the county v1.0 February 2019 .
    [Show full text]