DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XIX Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM December 1984 OPEN-FILE REPORT 85-22 This report (map) is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards (and stratigraphic nomenclature). Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Menlo Park, California 1985 The research results described in the following summaries were submitted by the investigators on October 10, 1984 and cover the 6-months period from May 1, 1984 through October 1, 1984. These reports include both work performed under contracts administered by the Geological Survey and work by members of the Geological Survey. The report summaries are grouped into the three major elements of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. Open File Report No. 85-22 This report has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Parts of it were prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and the opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. The data and interpretations in these progress reports may be reevaluated by the investigators upon completion of the research. Readers who wish to cite findings described herein should confirm their accuracy with the author. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XIX Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM Compiled by Muriel L. Jacobson Thelma R. Rodriguez CONTENTS Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Page I. Recent Tectonics and Earthquake Potential (T) Determine the tectonic framework and earthquake potential of U.S. seismogenic zones with significant hazard potential. Objective T-1. Regional seismic monitoring Objective T-2. Source zone characteristics Identify and map active crustal faults, using geophysical and geological data to interpret the structure and geometry of seismogenic zones. Identify and map active faults in seismic regions. Combine geophysical and geologic data to interpret tectonic setting of seismogenic zones.................... 47 Objective T-3. Earthquake potential Estimate fault slip rates/ earthquake magnitudes, and recurrence intervals for seismogenic zones and faults disclosed by research under Objectives T-1 and T-2, using geological and geophysical data. Earthquake potential estimates for regions of the U.S. west of 100°W. Earthquake potential estimates for regions of the U.S. east of 100 W. Support studies in geochemistry, geology, and soils science that enable fault movements to be accurately dated.................................................. 92 II. Earthquake Prediction Research (P) Collect observational data and develop the instrumentation, methodologies, and physical understanding needed to predict damaging earthquakes. Objective P-1. Prediction Methodology and Evaluation Develop methods to provide a rational basis for estimates of increased earthquake potential. Evaluate the relevance of various geophysical, geochemical, and hydrological data for earthquake prediction. Page Develop, operate and evaluate instrumentation for monitoring potential earthquake precursors. Analyze and evaluate seismicity data collected prior to medium and large earthquakes. Obtain and analyze data from seismically active regions of foreign countries through cooperative projects with the host countries. Systematically evaluate data and develop statistics that relate observations of specific phenomena to earthquake occurrence. Develop, study and test prediction methods that can be used to proceed from estimates of long-range earthquake potential to specific short-term predictions............... 158 Objective P-2. Earthquake Prediction Experiments Conduct data collection and analysis experiments in areas of California capable of great earthquakes, where large popula­ tions are at risk. The experiments will emphasize improved coordination of data collection, data reporting, review and analysis according to set schedules and standards. Collect and analyze data for an earthquake prediction experiment in southern California, concentrating on the southern San Andreas fault from Parkfield, California to the Salton Sea. Collect and analyze data for an earthquake prediction experiment in central California, concentrating on the San Andreas fault north of Parkfield, California......... 283 Objective P-3. Theoretical, Laboratory and Fault Zone Studies Improve our understanding of the physics of earthquake processes through theoretical and laboratory studies to guide and test earthquake prediction observations and data analysis. Measure physical properties of those zones selected for earthquake experiments, including stress, temperature, elastic and anelastic characteristics, pore pressure, and material properties. Conduct theoretical investigations of failure and pre-failure processes and the nature of large-scale earthquake instability. Conduct experimental studies of the dynamics of faulting and the constitutive properties of fault zone materials. Through the use of drilled holes and appropriate down hole instruments, determine the physical state of the fault zone in regions of earthquake prediction experiments...................... 422 ii Page Objective P-4. Induced Seismicity Studies Determine the physical mechanism responsible for reservoir- induced seismicity and develop techniques for predicting and mitigating this phenomena. Develop , test, and evaluate theories on the physics of induced seismicity. Develop techniques for predicting the character and severity of induced seismicity. Devise hazard assessment and mitigation strategies at sites of induced seismicity.............................. 482 III. Evaluation of Regional and Urban Earthquake Hazards (U) Delineate, evaluate, and document earthquake hazards and risk in urban regions at seismic risk. Regions of interest, in order of priority, are: 1) The Wasatch Front 2) Southern California 3) Northern California 4) Anchorage Region 5) Puget Sound 6) Mississippi Valley 7) Charleston Region Objective U-1. Establishment of information systems............. 504 Objective U-2. Mapping and synthesis of geologic hazards Prepare synthesis documents, maps and develop models on surface faulting, liquefaction potential, ground failure and tectonic deformation...................... 520 Objective U-3. Ground motion modeling Develop and apply techniques for estimating strong ground shaking....................... 555 iii Page Objective U-4. Loss estimation modeling Develop and apply techniques for estimating earthquake losses. Objective U-5. Implementation Index 1: Alphabetized by Principal Investigator....................... 599 Index 2: Alphabetized by Institution.................................. 604 Most of the technical summaries contained in this volume are for research contracts solicited by RFP-1284. The description in the previous table of contents corresponds to respective Elements and Objectives of that RFP. Additionally some of the summaries are for research objectives that were initiated in earlier years. These objectives are covered in the descriptions found in the following table of contents. iv Initiated before FY83 Page Earthquake Hazards and Risk Assessment (H) Objective 1. Establish an accurate and reliable national earthquake data base. Objective 2. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in the United States on a national scale. Objective 3. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in earthquake-prone urbanized regions in the western United States. Objective 4. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in earthquake-prone regions in the eastern United States. -- Objective 5. Improve capability to evaluate earthquake potential and predict character of surface faulting.-- --- ---- ---- --------- . 570 Objective 6. Improve capability to predict character of damaging ground shaking.--------- -------- 578 Objective 7. Improve capability to predict incidence, nature and extent of earthquake-induced ground failures, particularly landsliding and liquefaction.--- -- Objective 8. Improve capability to predict earthquake losses. Earthquake Prediction (P) Objective 1. Obtain pertinent geophysical observations and attempt to predict great or very damaging earthquakes. Operate seismic networks and analyze data to determine character of seismicity preceding major earthquakes. Measure and interpret geodetic strain and elevation changes in regions of high seismic potential, especially in seismic Q oD S * * »»»»»»»»» ^»^»»»»»«»»^»»»»»^^»»»»^» 580 Page Objective 2. Obtain definitive data that may reflect precursory changes near the source of moderately large earthquakes. Short term variations in the strain field prior to moderate or large earthquakes require careful documentation in association with other phenomena. Measure strain and tilt near-continuously to search for short term variations preceding large earthquakes. Complete development of system for stable, continuous monitoring of strain. Monitor radon emanation water properties and level in wells, especially in close association with other monitoring systems. Monitor apparent resistivity, magnetic field to determine whether precursory variations in these field occur. Monitor
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August 1994 New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement by Donald L. Wells and Kevin J. Coppersmith Abstract Source parameters for historical earthquakes worldwide are com­ piled to develop a series of empirical relationships among moment magnitude (M), surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, rupture area, and maximum and average displacement per event. The resulting data base is a significant update of previous compilations and includes the ad­ ditional source parameters of seismic moment, moment magnitude, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, and average surface displacement. Each source parameter is classified as reliable or unreliable, based on our evaluation of the accuracy of individual values. Only the reliable source parameters are used in the final analyses. In comparing source parameters, we note the fol­ lowing trends: (1) Generally, the length of rupture at the surface is equal to 75% of the subsurface rupture length; however, the ratio of surface rupture length to subsurface rupture length increases with magnitude; (2) the average surface dis­ placement per event is about one-half the maximum surface displacement per event; and (3) the average subsurface displacement on the fault plane is less than the maximum surface displacement but more than the average surface dis­ placement. Thus, for most earthquakes in this data base, slip on the fault plane at seismogenic depths is manifested by similar displacements at the surface. Log-linear regressions between earthquake magnitude and surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, and rupture area are especially well correlated, show­ ing standard deviations of 0.25 to 0.35 magnitude units.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest and the Panamint Shoshone (E.G., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934)
    109 VyI. NOTES ON BOUNDARIES AND CULTURE OF THE PANAMINT SHOSHONE AND OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE * Gordon L. Grosscup Boundary of the Panamint The Panamint Shoshone, also referred to as the Panamint, Koso (Coso) and Shoshone of eastern California, lived in that portion of the Basin and Range Province which extends from the Sierra Nevadas on the west to the Amargosa Desert of eastern Nevada on the east, and from Owens Valley and Fish Lake Valley in the north to an ill- defined boundary in the south shared with Southern Paiute groups. These boundaries will be discussed below. Previous attempts to define the Panamint Shoshone boundary have been made by Kroeber (1925), Steward (1933, 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1941) and Driver (1937). Others, who have worked with some of the groups which border the Panamint Shoshone, have something to say about the common boundary between the group of their special interest and the Panamint Shoshone (e.g., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934). Kroeber (1925: 589-560) wrote: "The territory of the westernmost member of this group [the Shoshone], our Koso, who form as it were the head of a serpent that curves across the map for 1, 500 miles, is one of the largest of any Californian people. It was also perhaps the most thinly populated, and one of the least defined. If there were boundaries, they are not known. To the west the crest of the Sierra has been assumed as the limit of the Koso toward the Tubatulabal. On the north were the eastern Mono of Owens River.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Seismic Mitigation Policy Gap Analysis
    Washington State Seismic Mitigation Policy Gap Analysis A Cross‐State Comparison Scott B. Miles, Ph.D. Brian D. Gouran, L.G. October, 2010 Prepared for Washington State Division of Emergency Management Resilience Institute Working Paper 2010_2 1 Washington State Gap Analysis; S. Miles & B. Gouran Resilience Institute Working Paper 2010_2 October, 2010 This document was prepared under an award from FEMA, Department of Homeland Security. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of FEMA or the US Department of Homeland Security. Washington State Gap Analysis; S. Miles & B. Gouran Resilience Institute Working Paper 2010_2 October, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to understand how Washington State compares with other states with respect to state‐level seismic mitigation policies. This facilitates the identification of potential Washington State policy gaps that might be filled with policies similar to those of other states. This study was accomplished by compiling, synthesizing, and analyzing state‐level policies listed in the mitigation plan of 47 states (3 could not be obtained by the completion of the study). A catalog of describing each of the compiled policies – legislation or executive orders – was assembled. A spreadsheet database was created in order to synthesize, search, and analyze the policies. Quantitative analysis was conducted using a cross‐state analysis and two different computed indicators based on seismic risk and policy count. The cross‐state analysis facilitate a broad assessment of Washington State’s policy coverage given its seismic risk, as well as identification of policies from states with more seismic mitigation policies that Washington State.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Losses to Single-Family Dwellings: California Experience
    Earthquake Losses to Single-Family Dwellings: California Experience U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1939-A Prepared in cooperation with the State of California Department of Insurance /§ L ---. =. i wt. 9<m III Cover: Damage caused by the 1933 Long Bench California, earthquake. Photograph by Harold Er^le, 1933. Chapter A Earthquake Losses to Single-Family Dwellings: California Experience By KARL V. STEINBRUGGE and ST. ALGERMISSEN Prepared in cooperation with the State of California Department of Insurance U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1939 ESTIMATION OF EARTHQUAKE LOSSES TO HOUSING IN CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1990 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Catalog-in-Publication Data Steinbrugge, Karl V. Earthquake losses to single-family dwellings. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1939-A) (Estimation of earthquake losses to housing in California) "Prepared in cooperation with the State of California Department of Insurance." Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1939-A 1. Insurance, Earthquake California. 2. Earthquakes California. I. Algermissen, Sylvester Theodore, 1932- . II. California. Dept. of Insurance. III. Title. IV. Series. V. Series:
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Minority Report to “Improving Natural Gas Safety in Earthquakes”
    Draft Minority Report to “Improving natural gas safety in earthquakes,” Prepared by Carl L. Strand For the ASCE-25 Task Committee on Earthquake Safety Issues for Gas Systems and the California Seismic Safety Commission July 10, 2002 I appreciate the opportunity of serving as a Member of the ASCE-25 Task Committee on Earthquake Safety Issues for Gas Systems. Ours was a consensus committee in the sense that efforts were made to achieve a consensus among the members on the wording of the Committee’s reports, which include a 1-page insert for the Seismic Safety Commission’s (SSC’s) “Homeowners’ guide to earthquake safety,” and a 40—50 page report. However, as is often the case with consensus committees, there was considerable disagreement on many of the issues that were raised. It is traditional in such cases for those in the minority to express their disagreements in a minority report, which is published at the end of the report that was approved by the majority. The Forward to this minority report—submitted as a letter to the SSC on June 26, 2002—summarizes my deep concerns about the majority report and the insert to the homeowners’ guide. This is a first draft of the minority report. It is my intention to revise it following the Hearing on July 11th, which will give me an opportunity to correct any errors, incorporate any additional comments raised during the Hearing that I believe should be included, and consider any suggestions that are made that might improve the document. If the majority report is revised, I may find it appropriate to delete certain sections of the minority report.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Plan for the International Masters Programme in Geophysics
    Study Plan for the International Masters Programme in Geophysics Credits 6 12 18 24 30 P1 Mathematical Geophysics P2 Statistical Geophysics P 3 Earth System Science P 4 Geocontinua r e t s e P3.1 Introduction to Earth System Science 1 [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P2.1 Statistics for Geosciences (Lecture) P4.1 Methods of Geocontinua (Lecture) m e S P1.1 Mathematical Geophysics (Lecture) [4 SWS, 6 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] t P3.2 Introduction to Earth System Science 2 [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] s 1 P1.2 Mathematical Geophysics (Exercise) [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P2.2 Statistics for Geosciences (Exercise) P4.2 Methods of Geocontinua (Exercise) P3.3 Geophysics Research: Overview on Methods and Open [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] Questions [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P8 Geophyiscal Data P 5 Computational Geophysics P6 Scientific Programming P7 Advanced Geophysics Acquisition and WP: Specialisation I r Analysis e t s e P7.1 Geodynamics [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P5.1 Computational Geophysics (Lecture) P6.1 Scientific Programming (Lecture) m e P8.1 Geophysical S [2SWS, 3ECTS] [2SWS, 3 ECTS] d P7.2 Seismology [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] Data Analysis: Elective Module, 6 ECTS n 2 Practical Introduction Choose one of WP1, WP2, WP3 P5.2 Computational Geophysics (Exercise) P6.2 Scientific Programming (Exercise) P7.3 Geo- and Paleomagnetism [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2SWS, 3ECTS] [2SWS, 3 ECTS] P9 Research Training P10 Advanced Topics in Geophysics Elective Modules: Interdisciplinarity WP: Specialisation II r e t s P10.1 Tools, Techniques and current Trends e P9.1 Presentation, Communication, in
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors to This Issue
    Contributors to this issue Faruq E. Akbar received his BS (1988) in civil engineering from Xiaofei Chen received his BSc (1982) in geophysics from the Univ- Bangladesh University of Engineering and ersity of Sciences and Technology of China, Technology and his MS (1992) in geophysics MSc (1985) from the Institute of Geophysics of from the University of New Orleans, Louisiana. SSB of China, and PhD (1991) from the He is currently a PhD student in the Department University of Southern California. He was with of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at IG/SSBC from 1985 to 1986. He is currently a Austin. His professional interests are seismic research associate at USC. His main research data processing, modeling, migration, and interests are seismic waves in complex hetero- inversion. geneous media, inversion techniques, and earthquake seismology. Mike D. Dentith is senior lecturer in geophysics at the Department T. Alkhalifah, see biography and photograph in September-October 1995 GEOPHYSICS, p. 1599. of Geology and Geophysics, University of Western Australia. His current research inter- ests include regional geophysical studies to Estelle Blais received her MScA (1994) in mineral engineering from determine the 3-D structure of greenstone belts, Ecole Polytechnique. She is currently working as a junior geophysi- the geometry of the Darling Fault and the min- cist for SIAL Geosciences in Montreal. eralization in the Canning Basin. He has edited ASEG's geophysics publication "Geophysical Fabio Boschetti graduated in geology from the University of Genoa, Signatures of Western Australia Mineral Italy. He then worked for four years with the Deposits." same university's physics department, special- izing in alternative energy assessment, atmos- pheric pollutant diffusion, and climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Research Results Described in the Following Summaries Were Submitted by the Investigators on May 10, 1984 and Cover the 6-Mo
    The research results described in the following summaries were submitted by the investigators on May 10, 1984 and cover the 6-months period from October 1, 1983 through May 1, 1984. These reports include both work performed under contracts administered by the Geological Survey and work by members of the Geological Survey. The report summaries are grouped into the three major elements of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. Open File Report No. 84-628 This report has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Parts of it were prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and the opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. The data and interpretations in these progress reports may be reevaluated by the investigators upon completion of the research. Readers who wish to cite findings described herein should confirm their accuracy with the author. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XVIII Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM Compiled by Muriel L. Jacobson Thelraa R. Rodriguez CONTENTS Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Page I. Recent Tectonics and Earthquake Potential (T) Determine the tectonic framework and earthquake potential of U.S. seismogenic zones with significant hazard potential. Objective T-1. Regional seismic monitoring........................ 1 Objective T-2. Source zone characteristics Identify and map active crustal faults, using geophysical and geological data to interpret the structure and geometry of seismogenic zones.
    [Show full text]
  • December 1987 #73
    December 1987 #73 CHINA LAKE MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP P. 0. BOX 2037 RIDGECREST, CA 93555 SCHEDULEOFEVENTS DECEMBER 4-6 American Alpine Club Annual Meeting B. Rockwell DECEMBER 5-6 Kidd Mountain Derrickson DECEMBER 9 Stretcher Hut Night Renta DECEMBER 12 Stretcher Practice Renta DECEMBER 14 Meeting Green DECEMBER 16 Christmas Party J. Westbrook JANUARY 1-4 Mt. Whitney North Fork Hinman JANUARY 6 Sign Cutting Practice Training Committee JANUARY 9-10 Joshua Tree Martin JANUARY 11 Meeting Finco JANUARY 16-17 RedSlateMountain B. Rockwell JANUARY 20 Map and Compass Training Training Committee JANUARY 23 CRMRA (CLMRG Hosting) Stogsdill JANUARY 24 Ice Climbing Mason JANUARY 30-31 Bald Mountain (Ski & Snowshoe Trip) Adams z PEANUTS By Schulz WE DID IT! WE MADE I'M 50 EXCITED I IT T0 THE TOP! FEELLIKEYODELING! SEARCHANDRESCUEOPERATIONS 87-28 9/16/87 Recovery CLMRG field members were Huey, Hinman, Palisades Huey Mason, McDowell, Mitchell, R. Walker, Silverman, Rogers and Derrickson. Janet Westbrook I received a call from Sgt. Dan Lucas of the coordinated. Two Inyo Posse members also Inyo County Sheriffs Office (ICSO) at 2100 on participated. 15 September, asking for assistance with a body recovery. Ed Wallacer had reportedly fallen when his anchor came loose while 87-29 9/30/87 Search descending Starlight Peak. Palisades Finco Wallacer's partner, Al Johnson, reported that the At 1800 on Wednesday, 30 September, the two of them were climbing the northwest ridge of pager went off with a message from Sgt. Dan Starlight (the north summit of North Palisade) but Lucas of the ICSO. We were needed for a retreated at 1430 without making the peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Haywired Area Affected by Collapse.Docx.Docx
    SESM 16-03 An Earthquake Urban Search and Rescue Model Illustrated with a Hypothetical Mw 7.0 Earthquake on the Hayward Fault By Keith A. Porter Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics Program Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering University of Colorado July 2016 UCB 428 Boulder, Colorado 80309-0428 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................................. ii An Earthquake Urban Search and Rescue Model Illustrated with a Hypothetical Mw 7.0 Earthquake on the Hayward Fault ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Objective ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Literature Review ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Literature About People Trapped by Building Collapse ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Geophysics a Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics
    Mathematical Geophysics A Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics edited by N. J. VU\AR G. NOLET M. J. R. WORTEL and S. A. P. L CLOETINGH University of Utrecht, The Netherlands D. Reidel Publishing Company AMEMBER OF THE KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS GROUP Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster / Tokyo CONTENTS Preface I. SEISMOLOGY AND THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH Waves in a 3-D Earth Chapter 1 G. Masters and M. Rilzwoller Low frequency seismology and three-dimensional structure - observational aspects. 1 Chapter 2 J.Park Free-oscillation coupling theory. 31 Chapter 3 K. Yomogida Surface waves in weakly heterogeneous media. 53 Chapter 4 R. Snieder On the connection between ray theory and scattering theory for surface waves. 11 Chapter 5 A. van den Berg A hybrid solution for wave propagation problems in inhomogeneous media. 85 Large-scale inversion Chapter 6 P. Mora Elastic wavefield inversion and the adjoint operator for the elastic wave equation. 117 Chapter 7 B.L.N. Kennett and P.R. Williamson Subspace methods for large-scale nonlinear inversion. 139 Chapter 8 W. Spakman and G. Nolet Imaging algorithms, accuracy and resolution in delay time tomography. 155 VI CONTENTS II. CONVECTION AND LITHOSPHERIC PROCESSES Geomagnetism Chapter 9 J. Bloxham The determination of fluid flow at the core surface from geomagnetic observations . Mantle convection Chapter 10 G.T. Jarvis and W.R. Peltier Long wavelength features of mantle convection. Chapter 11 F. Quareni and D.A. Yuen Mean-field methods in mantle convection. Chapter 12 P. Machetel and D.A. Yuen Infinite Prandtl number spherical-shell convection .
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Ground Motion
    The Lorna Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989-Strong Ground Motion ROGER D. BORCHERDT, Editor STRONG GROUND MOTION AND GROUND FAILURE Thomas L. Holzer, Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1551-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication, October 6, 1993 Text and illustrations edited by George A. Havach Library of Congress catalog-card No. 92-32287 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page A1 Strong-motion recordings ---................................. 9 By A. Gerald Brady and Anthony F. Shakal Effect of known three-dimensional crustal structure on the strong ground motion and estimated slip history of the earthquake ................................ 39 By Vernon F. Cormier and Wei-Jou Su Simulation of strong ground motion ....................... 53 By Jeffry L. Stevens and Steven M. Day Influence of near-surface geology on the direction of ground motion above a frequency of 1 Hz----------- 61 By John E. Vidale and Ornella Bonamassa Effect of critical reflections from the Moho on the attenuation of strong ground motion ------------------ 67 By Paul G. Somerville, Nancy F. Smith, and Robert W. Graves Influences of local geology on strong and weak ground motions recorded in the San Francisco Bay region and their implications for site-specific provisions ----------------- --------------- 77 By Roger D.
    [Show full text]