DOCSLIB.ORG

Contributors to This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contributors to This Issue Contributors to this issue Faruq E. Akbar received his BS (1988) in civil engineering from Xiaofei Chen received his BSc (1982) in geophysics from the Univ- Bangladesh University of Engineering and ersity of Sciences and Technology of China, Technology and his MS (1992) in geophysics MSc (1985) from the Institute of Geophysics of from the University of New Orleans, Louisiana. SSB of China, and PhD (1991) from the He is currently a PhD student in the Department University of Southern California. He was with of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at IG/SSBC from 1985 to 1986. He is currently a Austin. His professional interests are seismic research associate at USC. His main research data processing, modeling, migration, and interests are seismic waves in complex hetero- inversion. geneous media, inversion techniques, and earthquake seismology. Mike D. Dentith is senior lecturer in geophysics at the Department T. Alkhalifah, see biography and photograph in September-October 1995 GEOPHYSICS, p. 1599. of Geology and Geophysics, University of Western Australia. His current research inter- ests include regional geophysical studies to Estelle Blais received her MScA (1994) in mineral engineering from determine the 3-D structure of greenstone belts, Ecole Polytechnique. She is currently working as a junior geophysi- the geometry of the Darling Fault and the min- cist for SIAL Geosciences in Montreal. eralization in the Canning Basin. He has edited ASEG's geophysics publication "Geophysical Fabio Boschetti graduated in geology from the University of Genoa, Signatures of Western Australia Mineral Italy. He then worked for four years with the Deposits." same university's physics department, special- izing in alternative energy assessment, atmos- pheric pollutant diffusion, and climatology. He currently holds an Overseas Postgraduate Gary D. Egbert received his BA (1977) in mathematics from the Research Scholarship and is a PhD student in University of California at Berkeley, and an MS (1981) in statistics mathematical geophysics at the University of and PhD (1987) in geophysics from the University of Washington. He Western Australia. His PhD project is on the is an associate professor in the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric inversion of geophysical data using genetic Sciences at Oregon State University. His interests include electro- algorithms. magnetic induction, signal processing, geophysical inverse theory, and oceanographic data assimilation. Wenying Cai, see biography and photograph in March 1992 Ezio Faccioli received his dr. eng. (1964) from the Technical Univer- GEOPHYSICS, p. 515. sity of Milano (TUM) and PhD (1968) in civil engineering from the University of Illinois. From 1971 to 1976 he was employed by Anat Canning, see biography and photograph in March-April UNESCO as coordinator of the U.N.-sponsored GEOPHYSICS 1996, p. 615. Soil Dynamics Project at the National Univer- sity of Mexico. Since 1977 he has been espe- David A. Casper received his BSEE degree (1988) from the Univ- cially active in international projects sponsored ersity of Rochester, New York, and MSEE by the European Commission in earthquake (1991) from the University of Wisconsin, engineering and related fields. He has contri- Madison. He is currently working toward a PhD buted to the analysis of earthquake site effects in electrical engineering at the University of and to numerical models for deterministic and Wisconsin, Madison. His doctoral research ap- stochastic wave propagation in both linear and nonlinear earth media. plies electromagnetic wave theory and signal Among his main present interests is the numerical modeling of earth- processing techniques to improve groundwater quake wave in 2-D and 3-D irregular geological configurations. He is radar for agricultural applications. a member of the Seismological Society of America. James E. Gaiser received his MS (1977) in geophysics from the University of Utah and his PhD (1989) in geo- physics from the the University of Texas at Dallas. In 1977 he joined ARCO in the geo- David A. Chapin received his BSc (1979) from the George Wash- physical analysis and processing group, before ington University and his MSc (1981) from moving to research and development in 1981 Lehigh University, both in geology. He was where he worked on vertical seismic profiling, employed by Gulf Research from 1981 to 1984. elastic wave propagation, and seismic aniso- Since 1984 he has been with ARCO. His spe- tropy. Since 1992 he has been working for cialty is in interpretation of gravity and mag- Western Geophysical in Englewood, Colorado, netics data. He is a senior principal geophysi- cist responsible for research in new exploration where he is currently a senior research geo- physicist. His research interests are in 3-D seis- technology utilizing potential-fields data. He is mic imaging in anisotropic media, noise attenuation, and 3-D con- a member of SEG and the Dallas Geophysical Society. verted wave seismology. He is a member of SEG, EAGE, RAS, and EEGS. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geophysics/article-pdf/61/4/1237/3173296/1237.pdf 1237 by guest on 25 September 2021 1238 This issue of GEOPHYSICS Gerald H. F. Gardner, see biography and photograph in March- King-Jau Samuel Kung received a BS (1975) in soil and water con- April 1996 GEOPHYSICS, p. 616. servation from Chung-Hsing University, Taiching, Taiwan, and MS (1982) and PhD (1984) degrees in soil and water engineering from Mark Grasmueck received his MSc (1991) and PhD (1995) degrees Cornell University, Ithica, New York. In 1986 he joined the faculty of in geophysics from the Swiss Federal Institute the University of Wisconsin, Madison, where he is currently an asso- of Technology in Zurich. He worked in a disci- ciate professor with a joint appointment to the departments of Soil plinary research group combining engineering Science and Agricultural Engineering. and applied geophysics. His main research goal was to produce more reliable interpretations of Mickaele Le Ravalec graduated (1992) from the Ecole et Observa- georadar data in order to foster the application toire de Physique de Strasbourg. She is current- of georadar in geological engineering. In 1996 ly a PhD student in the Geophysics Department he joined Shell International Exploration and at the University of Rennes I. Her research Production B.V, The Netherlands. interests are in the numerical modeling of elas- tic properties of rocks. Stephan Grollwig studied geophysics at the University of Jena, Germany, and obtained a Dr. rer. nat (1985) from the same university. He was a scientist and lecturer at the physical department of the Univ- ersity of Jena from 1980 to 1988 before moving Ron D. List obtained an MSc from the University of New England to the Central Institute for Physics of the Earth and a PhD from the University of Sheffield. He and GeoForschungsZentrum in Potsdam, is a senior lecturer in applied mathematics at Germany. Since 1992 he has been the managing the University of Western Australia. His director of GESO GmbH in Jena. His main research interests include the inversion of geo- research fields are solid body physics, X-ray physical data. physics, crystallography, physics of measuring techniques, fiber optics, fiber optic sensors, seismometry, environmental physics, and geophysics. He has pub- lished approximately 50 papers in German and international journals. He is a member of the German Physical Society. Yves Gueguen, see biography and photograph in June 1991 GEOPHYSICS, p. 896. Ce Liu received his BS (1982), MS (1984), and PhD (1988) degrees in engineering from Xian Jiatong University, P. R. China. He is now an assistant professor in Jerry M. Harris, see biography and photograph in March-April the Department of Electrical Engineering at the 1995 GEOPHYSICS, p. 616. University of Houston, Texas. His research interests include subsurface sensing, EM mod- Eckart Hurtig earned his Dr. rer.nat (1961) in geology from the Univ- eling and inversion, well logging, and wireless ersity of Greifswald and his Dr. rer.nat.habil. communications. He is a member of IEEE, (1967) from the University of Leipzig, where SPWLA, and EEGS. he was a lecturer at the Institute for Geo- physical Research. From 1971 to 1992 he was with the Central Institute for Physics of the Earth and the GeoFor-schingsZentrum in Potsdam, Germany. He is presently with GESO Dean W. Livelybrooks received a BS (1977) in earth sciences from GmbH Jena, Germany. His research interests MIT and an MSc (1984) and PhD (1990) in include geothermica, seismology, high pressure physics from the University of Oregon. From geophysics, structure of the Earth's crust and of 1977 to 1981 he worked in the mining and geot- the lithosphere, and environmental geophysics. hermal exploration industries. From 1991 to He has published more than 100 scientific articles in national and 1993 he worked at the University of Edinburgh international journals. He is a member of the German Geophysical using magnetotellurics as a tool for studying Society and the Geothermal Association of Germany. regional-scale tectonic features such as the Iapetus Suture Zone. Since 1993 he has been a research professor at the Ecole Polytechnique. Katrin Kuhn studied mathematics at the University of Jena, His interests include all aspects of the mag- Germany. From 1989 to 1992 she was a scien- netelluric method and the use of ground-pene- tist at the Central Institute for Physics of the trating radar applied to mining and environmental problems. He is a Earth and the GeoForschungsZentrum in member of SEG, AGU, and EEGS. Potsdam, Germany. Since 1992 she has been with GESO GmbH Jena. Her main research Fabio Maggio graduated with honors (1992) in physics from the interests are in mathematical modeling and sim- University of Genoa, Italy. In the same year he joined the Center for ulation, physics of measuring techniques, seis- Advanced Studies, Research, and Development in Sardinia in mometry, and environmental geophysics. She Cagliari, Italy, where he worked as a trainee researcher in the Group has been published in scientific journals world- of Applied Mathematics and Simulation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Study Plan for the International Masters Programme in Geophysics
    Study Plan for the International Masters Programme in Geophysics Credits 6 12 18 24 30 P1 Mathematical Geophysics P2 Statistical Geophysics P 3 Earth System Science P 4 Geocontinua r e t s e P3.1 Introduction to Earth System Science 1 [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P2.1 Statistics for Geosciences (Lecture) P4.1 Methods of Geocontinua (Lecture) m e S P1.1 Mathematical Geophysics (Lecture) [4 SWS, 6 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] t P3.2 Introduction to Earth System Science 2 [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] s 1 P1.2 Mathematical Geophysics (Exercise) [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P2.2 Statistics for Geosciences (Exercise) P4.2 Methods of Geocontinua (Exercise) P3.3 Geophysics Research: Overview on Methods and Open [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] Questions [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P8 Geophyiscal Data P 5 Computational Geophysics P6 Scientific Programming P7 Advanced Geophysics Acquisition and WP: Specialisation I r Analysis e t s e P7.1 Geodynamics [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] P5.1 Computational Geophysics (Lecture) P6.1 Scientific Programming (Lecture) m e P8.1 Geophysical S [2SWS, 3ECTS] [2SWS, 3 ECTS] d P7.2 Seismology [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] Data Analysis: Elective Module, 6 ECTS n 2 Practical Introduction Choose one of WP1, WP2, WP3 P5.2 Computational Geophysics (Exercise) P6.2 Scientific Programming (Exercise) P7.3 Geo- and Paleomagnetism [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2 SWS, 3 ECTS] [2SWS, 3ECTS] [2SWS, 3 ECTS] P9 Research Training P10 Advanced Topics in Geophysics Elective Modules: Interdisciplinarity WP: Specialisation II r e t s P10.1 Tools, Techniques and current Trends e P9.1 Presentation, Communication, in
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Geophysics a Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics
    Mathematical Geophysics A Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics edited by N. J. VU\AR G. NOLET M. J. R. WORTEL and S. A. P. L CLOETINGH University of Utrecht, The Netherlands D. Reidel Publishing Company AMEMBER OF THE KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS GROUP Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster / Tokyo CONTENTS Preface I. SEISMOLOGY AND THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH Waves in a 3-D Earth Chapter 1 G. Masters and M. Rilzwoller Low frequency seismology and three-dimensional structure - observational aspects. 1 Chapter 2 J.Park Free-oscillation coupling theory. 31 Chapter 3 K. Yomogida Surface waves in weakly heterogeneous media. 53 Chapter 4 R. Snieder On the connection between ray theory and scattering theory for surface waves. 11 Chapter 5 A. van den Berg A hybrid solution for wave propagation problems in inhomogeneous media. 85 Large-scale inversion Chapter 6 P. Mora Elastic wavefield inversion and the adjoint operator for the elastic wave equation. 117 Chapter 7 B.L.N. Kennett and P.R. Williamson Subspace methods for large-scale nonlinear inversion. 139 Chapter 8 W. Spakman and G. Nolet Imaging algorithms, accuracy and resolution in delay time tomography. 155 VI CONTENTS II. CONVECTION AND LITHOSPHERIC PROCESSES Geomagnetism Chapter 9 J. Bloxham The determination of fluid flow at the core surface from geomagnetic observations . Mantle convection Chapter 10 G.T. Jarvis and W.R. Peltier Long wavelength features of mantle convection. Chapter 11 F. Quareni and D.A. Yuen Mean-field methods in mantle convection. Chapter 12 P. Machetel and D.A. Yuen Infinite Prandtl number spherical-shell convection .
    [Show full text]
  • Review 2012 I
    Geomagnetism Review 2012 i Geomagnetism Review 2012 Alan W P Thomson (editor) [email protected] Contributors: Orsi Baillie, Ciarán Beggan, Ellen Clarke, Ewan Dawson, Simon Flower, Brian Hamilton, Ted Harris, Gemma Kelly, Susan Macmillan, Sarah Reay, Tom Shanahan, Alan Thomson, Christopher Turbitt The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey licence number 100017897/2012 Key words Geomagnetism. Front cover A snapshot of the electric field strength across the UK during the geomagnetic storm of 17 March 2013. Bibliographical reference THOMSON, A.W.P. ET AL 2013. Geomagnetism Review 2012. British Geological Survey Open Report OR/13/030 44pp. © NERC 2013 Edinburgh British Geological Survey 2013 To Contents Page ii To Contents Page 1 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 Technical, Observatory and Field Operations .......................................... 8 UK and Overseas Observatories ................................................................................... 8 Geoelectric Field Monitoring ........................................................................................ 10 High Frequency Magnetometers ................................................................................. 12 The BGS contribution to INTERMAGNET ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Knowledge and Data in Active Seismology1
    Integration of Knowledge and Data in Active Seismology1 Ludmila P. Braginskaya, Andrey P. Grigoruk, Valery V. Kovalevsky Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS (ICM&MG SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia, [email protected] Abstract. The paper presents the principles of organization of an information environment providing a holistic view of the subject area and various aspects of scientific activity in active seismology. The subject ontology “Active Seismology” is used as a conceptual basis and information model. Keywords: active seismology, ontology, knowledge portal 1 Introduction Since the 1970s a new direction in geophysics has been developing, which has recently been called active seismology, based on powerful controlled vibration sources of seismic waves of the low-frequency range [1]. The use of such sources has opened up new possibilities for investigations of the deep structure of Earth's crust and upper mantle and the geodynamic processes in earthquake-prone and volcanic zones. The active seismology methods have found application in new areas of geophysics and geophysical engineering. Currently, the following new vibrational geotechnologies are being actively developed: active vibroseismic monitoring of earthquake-prone and volcanic zones; vibroseismic action on oil formations to increase oil recovery; vibrational microseismic zoning; study of the stability of deep structures in areas of construction and operation of environmentally hazardous constructions, etc. During the formation and development of the active seismology methods, numerous theoretical and experimental works have been carried out to substantiate the vibroseismic method, to study the processes of radiation of seismic waves by vibrational sources, the characteristics of their wave fields and physical effects under the vibrational action on the geological medium [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Coulomb Stress Accumulation Along the San Andreas Fault System
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. B6, 2296, doi:10.1029/2002JB002136, 2003 Coulomb stress accumulation along the San Andreas Fault system Bridget Smith and David Sandwell Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, USA Received 2 August 2002; revised 16 January 2003; accepted 18 February 2003; published 11 June 2003. [1] Stress accumulation rates along the primary segments of the San Andreas Fault system are computed using a three-dimensional (3-D) elastic half-space model with realistic fault geometry. The model is developed in the Fourier domain by solving for the response of an elastic half-space due to a point vector body force and analytically integrating the force from a locking depth to infinite depth. This approach is then applied to the San Andreas Fault system using published slip rates along 18 major fault strands of the fault zone. GPS-derived horizontal velocity measurements spanning the entire 1700 Â 200 km region are then used to solve for apparent locking depth along each primary fault segment. This simple model fits remarkably well (2.43 mm/yr RMS misfit), although some discrepancies occur in the Eastern California Shear Zone. The model also predicts vertical uplift and subsidence rates that are in agreement with independent geologic and geodetic estimates. In addition, shear and normal stresses along the major fault strands are used to compute Coulomb stress accumulation rate. As a result, we find earthquake recurrence intervals along the San Andreas Fault system to be inversely proportional to Coulomb stress accumulation rate, in agreement with typical coseismic stress drops of 1–10 MPa.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (Iugg)
    Annual Report for 2005 of the INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEODESY AND GEOPHYSICS (IUGG) INTRODUCTION Established in 1919, the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) is the international organization dedicated to advancing, promoting, and communicating knowledge of the Earth system, its space environment, and the dynamical processes causing change. Through its constituent Associations, Commissions, and services, IUGG convenes international assemblies and workshops, undertakes research, assembles observations, gains insights, coordinates activities, liaises with other scientific bodies, plays an advocacy role, contributes to education, and works to expand capabilities and participation worldwide. Data, information, and knowledge gained are made openly available for the benefit of society – to provide the information necessary for the discovery and responsible use of natural resources, sustainable management of the environment, reducing the impact of natural hazards, and to satisfy our need to understand the Earth’s natural environment and the consequences of human activities. IUGG Associations and Union Commissions encourage scientific investigation of Earth science and especially interdisciplinary aspects. Each Association establishes working groups and commissions that can be accessed by using the links on our website. The web site, available in English and French, can be found at http://www.IUGG.org. MEMBERSHIP By their very nature, geodetic and geophysical studies require a high degree of international co-operation. IUGG is critically dependent on the scientific and financial support of its member Adhering Bodies. The list of present and past IUGG Adhering Bodies is published annually in the IUGG Yearbook, which is posted on the web site and is available from the Secretariat. Each Adhering Body establishes a National Committee for IUGG, and names Correspondents to each Association (as appropriate).
    [Show full text]
  • Course Catalogue Master Geophysics
    Course Catalogue Master Geophysics Master of Science, M.Sc. (120 ECTS points) According to the Examination Regulations as of 30 October 2007 88/066/—/M0/H/2007 The master’s programme is jointly offered by Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Technische Universität München. Munich, 5 February 2014 Contents 1 Abbreviations and Remarks 3 2 Module: P 1 Fundamentals from Mathematics and Physics 4 3 Module: P 2 Basic Geophysics 7 4 Module: P 3 Tools 10 5 Module: P 4 Advanced Geophysics 13 6 Module: WP 1 Advanced Geodynamics 15 7 Module: WP 2 Advanced Seismology 18 8 Module: WP 3 Advanced Paleo- and Geomagnetism 21 9 Module: WP 4 Geochemistry and Geomaterials 24 10 Module: WP 5 Applied and Industrial Geophysics 26 11 Module: WP 6 ESPACE 29 12 Module: P 5 Independent Scientific Research 32 2 1 Abbreviations and Remarks CP Credit Point(s), ECTS Point(s) ECTS European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System h hours SS summer semester WS winter semester SWS credit hours 1. Please note: The course catalogue serves as an orientation only for your course of study. For binding regulations please consult the official examination regulations. These can be found at: www.lmu.de/studienangebot for the respective programme of study. 2. In the description of the associated module components ECTS points in brackets are for internal use only. ECTS points without brackets are awarded for passing the corre- sponding examination. 3. Modules whose identifier starts with P are mandatory modules. Modules whose identi- fier starts with WP are elective modules.
    [Show full text]
  • An Extended Version of the C3FM Geomagnetic Field Model: Application of a Continuous Frozen-Flux Constraint
    Originally published as: Wardinski, I., Lesur, V. (2012): An extended version of the C3FM geomagnetic field model: application of a continuous frozen-flux constraint. - Geophysical Journal International, 189, 3, pp. 1409—1429. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05384.x Geophysical Journal International Geophys. J. Int. (2012) 189, 1409–1429 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05384.x An extended version of the C3FM geomagnetic field model: application of a continuous frozen-flux constraint Ingo Wardinski and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 2.3: Earth’s Magnetic Field, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 2012 January 11. Received 2012 January 11; in original form 2011 May 3 SUMMARY A recently developed method of constructing core field models that satisfies a frozen-flux constraint is used to built a field model covering 1957–2008. Like the previous model C3FM, we invert observatory secular variation data and adopt satellite-based field models to constrain the field morphology in 1980 and 2004. To derive a frozen-flux field model, we start from a field model that has been derived using ‘classical’ techniques, which is spatially and temporally smooth. This is achieved by using order six B-splines as basis functions for the temporal evolution of the Gauss coefficients and requiring that the model minimizes the integral of the third-time derivative of the field taken over the core surface. That guarantees a robust estimate of the secular acceleration. Comparisons between the ‘classical’ and the frozen-flux field models are given, and we describe to what extend the frozen-flux constraint is adhered.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Flows and the Effects of a Strong Surface Tension Francesco Fanelli
    Geophysical flows and the effects of a strong surface tension Francesco Fanelli To cite this version: Francesco Fanelli. Geophysical flows and the effects of a strong surface tension. 2016. hal-01323692 HAL Id: hal-01323692 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01323692 Preprint submitted on 31 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Geophysical flows and the effects of a strong surface tension Francesco Fanelli Institut Camille Jordan - UMR CNRS 5208 Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Bâtiment Braconnier 43, Boulevard du 11 novembre 1918 F-69622 Villeurbanne cedex – FRANCE [email protected] May 31, 2016 Abstract In the present note we review some recent results for a class of singular perturbation problems for a Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system with Coriolis force. More precisely, we study the asymptotic behaviour of solutions when taking incompressible and fast rotation limits simultaneously, in a constant capillarity regime. Our main purpose here is to explain in detail the description of the phenomena we want to capture, and the mathematical derivation of the system of equations. Hence, a huge part of this work is devoted to physical considerations and mathematical modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Observational and Theoretical Studies of the Dynamics of Mantle Plume–Mid-Ocean Ridge Interaction
    OBSERVATIONAL AND THEORETICAL STUDIES OF THE DYNAMICS OF MANTLE PLUME–MID-OCEAN RIDGE INTERACTION G. Ito J. Lin D. Graham Department of Geology and Department of Geology and College of Oceanic and Geophysics, School of Ocean Geophysics, Atmospheric Sciences, and Earth Science and Technology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Oregon State University, University of Hawaii, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA Corvallis, Oregon, USA Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Received 24 July 2002; revised 16 May 2003; accepted 5 August 2003; published 20 November 2003. [1] Hot spot–mid-ocean ridge interactions cause many interaction remain enigmatic. Outstanding problems of the largest structural and chemical anomalies in pertain to whether plumes flow toward and along mid- Earths ocean basins. Correlated geophysical and geo- ocean ridges in narrow pipe-like channels or as broad chemical anomalies are widely explained by mantle expanding gravity currents, the origin of geochemical plumes that deliver hot and compositionally distinct mixing trends observed along ridges, and how mantle material toward and along mid-ocean ridges. Composi- plumes alter the geometry of the mid-ocean ridge plate tional anomalies are seen in trace element and isotope boundary, as well as the origin of other ridge axis anom- ratios, while elevated mantle temperatures are suggested alies not obviously related to mantle plumes. by anomalously thick crust, low-density mantle, low INDEX TERMS: 8121 Tectonophysics: Dynamics, convection currents mantle seismic velocities, and elevated degrees
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth A. Hoffman
    KENNETH A. HOFFMAN https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kenneth_Hoffman3/?ev=hdr_xprf DEGREES: University of California, Berkeley, CA (thesis advisor: John Verhoogen) • 1966 B.A. Physics • 1969 M.A. Geophysics • 1973 Ph.D. Geophysics POSTDOCTORAL: • 1972-73 Dept. Geology & Geophysics, University of Minnesota PROFESSORSHIP: Physics Department, Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA • 1974 Lecturer • 1974-78 Assist. Prof. • 1978-83 Assoc. Prof. • 1983-2006 Prof. • Now Emeritus VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS & RESEARCH POSITIONS: • 2007-14 Senior Research Scientist, Geoscience Department, University of Wisconsin–Madison • 2004 Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France • 1998 Institut für Geophysik, ETH-Zürich, Switzerland • 1997-98 Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland • 1988 Institute de Physique du Globe, Université de Paris, France • 1980-81 Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia • 1981 Victoria University, Wellington, NZ • 1977-78 University of Minnesota __________________________________ PRIMARY DISTINCTIONS: 2001 • Allan Cox Memorial Lecture [Fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), San Francisco] Featured Webcast: http://www.agu.org/webcast/hoffman.html 2001 • Series of invited talks in Beijing, China 1999 • Invited talk at the Royal Society of London 1998 • Invited public lecture at Geneva’s Museum of Natural History 1997-00 • President: Geomagnetism-Paleomagnetism (GP) Section of the American Geophysical Union 1995-99 • Chairman: Division I 'Internal Fields'
    [Show full text]
  • Monte Carlo Methods in Geophysical Inverse Problems
    MONTE CARLO METHODS IN GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS Malcolm Sambridge Klaus Mosegaard Research School of Earth Sciences Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy Institute of Advanced Studies Physics and Geophysics Australian National University University of Copenhagen Canberra, ACT, Australia Copenhagen, Denmark Received 27 June 2000; revised 15 December 2001; accepted 9 September 2002; published 5 December 2002. [1] Monte Carlo inversion techniques were first used by simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, and other im- Earth scientists more than 30 years ago. Since that time portance sampling approaches. The objective is to act as they have been applied to a wide range of problems, both an introduction for newcomers to the field and a from the inversion of free oscillation data for whole comprehensive reference source for researchers already Earth seismic structure to studies at the meter-scale familiar with Monte Carlo inversion. It is our hope that lengths encountered in exploration seismology. This pa- the paper will serve as a timely summary of an expanding per traces the development and application of Monte and versatile methodology and also encourage applica- Carlo methods for inverse problems in the Earth sci- tions to new areas of the Earth sciences. INDEX TERMS:3260 ences and in particular geophysics. The major develop- Mathematical Geophysics: Inverse theory; 1794 History of Geophysics: ments in theory and application are traced from the Instruments and techniques; 0902 Exploration Geophysics: Computa- earliest work of the Russian school and the pioneering tional methods, seismic; 7294 Seismology: Instruments and techniques; studies in the west by Press [1968] to modern importance KEYWORDS:Monte Carlo nonlinear inversion numerical techniques sampling and ensemble inference methods.
    [Show full text]