UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XIX Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM December 1984 OPEN-FILE REPORT 85-22 This report (map) is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards (and stratigraphic nomenclature). Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Menlo Park, California 1985 The research results described in the following summaries were submitted by the investigators on October 10, 1984 and cover the 6-months period from May 1, 1984 through October 1, 1984. These reports include both work performed under contracts administered by the Geological Survey and work by members of the Geological Survey. The report summaries are grouped into the three major elements of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. Open File Report No. 85-22 This report has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Parts of it were prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and the opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. The data and interpretations in these progress reports may be reevaluated by the investigators upon completion of the research. Readers who wish to cite findings described herein should confirm their accuracy with the author. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XIX Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM Compiled by Muriel L. Jacobson Thelma R. Rodriguez CONTENTS Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Page I. Recent Tectonics and Earthquake Potential (T) Determine the tectonic framework and earthquake potential of U.S. seismogenic zones with significant hazard potential. Objective T-1. Regional seismic monitoring Objective T-2. Source zone characteristics Identify and map active crustal faults, using geophysical and geological data to interpret the structure and geometry of seismogenic zones. Identify and map active faults in seismic regions. Combine geophysical and geologic data to interpret tectonic setting of seismogenic zones.................... 47 Objective T-3. Earthquake potential Estimate fault slip rates/ earthquake magnitudes, and recurrence intervals for seismogenic zones and faults disclosed by research under Objectives T-1 and T-2, using geological and geophysical data. Earthquake potential estimates for regions of the U.S. west of 100°W. Earthquake potential estimates for regions of the U.S. east of 100 W. Support studies in geochemistry, geology, and soils science that enable fault movements to be accurately dated.................................................. 92 II. Earthquake Prediction Research (P) Collect observational data and develop the instrumentation, methodologies, and physical understanding needed to predict damaging earthquakes. Objective P-1. Prediction Methodology and Evaluation Develop methods to provide a rational basis for estimates of increased earthquake potential. Evaluate the relevance of various geophysical, geochemical, and hydrological data for earthquake prediction. Page Develop, operate and evaluate instrumentation for monitoring potential earthquake precursors. Analyze and evaluate seismicity data collected prior to medium and large earthquakes. Obtain and analyze data from seismically active regions of foreign countries through cooperative projects with the host countries. Systematically evaluate data and develop statistics that relate observations of specific phenomena to earthquake occurrence. Develop, study and test prediction methods that can be used to proceed from estimates of long-range earthquake potential to specific short-term predictions............... 158 Objective P-2. Earthquake Prediction Experiments Conduct data collection and analysis experiments in areas of California capable of great earthquakes, where large popula­ tions are at risk. The experiments will emphasize improved coordination of data collection, data reporting, review and analysis according to set schedules and standards. Collect and analyze data for an earthquake prediction experiment in southern California, concentrating on the southern San Andreas fault from Parkfield, California to the Salton Sea. Collect and analyze data for an earthquake prediction experiment in central California, concentrating on the San Andreas fault north of Parkfield, California......... 283 Objective P-3. Theoretical, Laboratory and Fault Zone Studies Improve our understanding of the physics of earthquake processes through theoretical and laboratory studies to guide and test earthquake prediction observations and data analysis. Measure physical properties of those zones selected for earthquake experiments, including stress, temperature, elastic and anelastic characteristics, pore pressure, and material properties. Conduct theoretical investigations of failure and pre-failure processes and the nature of large-scale earthquake instability. Conduct experimental studies of the dynamics of faulting and the constitutive properties of fault zone materials. Through the use of drilled holes and appropriate down hole instruments, determine the physical state of the fault zone in regions of earthquake prediction experiments...................... 422 ii Page Objective P-4. Induced Seismicity Studies Determine the physical mechanism responsible for reservoir- induced seismicity and develop techniques for predicting and mitigating this phenomena. Develop , test, and evaluate theories on the physics of induced seismicity. Develop techniques for predicting the character and severity of induced seismicity. Devise hazard assessment and mitigation strategies at sites of induced seismicity.............................. 482 III. Evaluation of Regional and Urban Earthquake Hazards (U) Delineate, evaluate, and document earthquake hazards and risk in urban regions at seismic risk. Regions of interest, in order of priority, are: 1) The Wasatch Front 2) Southern California 3) Northern California 4) Anchorage Region 5) Puget Sound 6) Mississippi Valley 7) Charleston Region Objective U-1. Establishment of information systems............. 504 Objective U-2. Mapping and synthesis of geologic hazards Prepare synthesis documents, maps and develop models on surface faulting, liquefaction potential, ground failure and tectonic deformation...................... 520 Objective U-3. Ground motion modeling Develop and apply techniques for estimating strong ground shaking....................... 555 iii Page Objective U-4. Loss estimation modeling Develop and apply techniques for estimating earthquake losses. Objective U-5. Implementation Index 1: Alphabetized by Principal Investigator....................... 599 Index 2: Alphabetized by Institution.................................. 604 Most of the technical summaries contained in this volume are for research contracts solicited by RFP-1284. The description in the previous table of contents corresponds to respective Elements and Objectives of that RFP. Additionally some of the summaries are for research objectives that were initiated in earlier years. These objectives are covered in the descriptions found in the following table of contents. iv Initiated before FY83 Page Earthquake Hazards and Risk Assessment (H) Objective 1. Establish an accurate and reliable national earthquake data base. Objective 2. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in the United States on a national scale. Objective 3. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in earthquake-prone urbanized regions in the western United States. Objective 4. Delineate and evaluate earthquake hazards and risk in earthquake-prone regions in the eastern United States. -- Objective 5. Improve capability to evaluate earthquake potential and predict character of surface faulting.-- --- ---- ---- --------- . 570 Objective 6. Improve capability to predict character of damaging ground shaking.--------- -------- 578 Objective 7. Improve capability to predict incidence, nature and extent of earthquake-induced ground failures, particularly landsliding and liquefaction.--- -- Objective 8. Improve capability to predict earthquake losses. Earthquake Prediction (P) Objective 1. Obtain pertinent geophysical observations and attempt to predict great or very damaging earthquakes. Operate seismic networks and analyze data to determine character of seismicity preceding major earthquakes. Measure and interpret geodetic strain and elevation changes in regions of high seismic potential, especially in seismic Q oD S * * »»»»»»»»» ^»^»»»»»«»»^»»»»»^^»»»»^» 580 Page Objective 2. Obtain definitive data that may reflect precursory changes near the source of moderately large earthquakes. Short term variations in the strain field prior to moderate or large earthquakes require careful documentation in association with other phenomena. Measure strain and tilt near-continuously to search for short term variations preceding large earthquakes. Complete development of system for stable, continuous monitoring of strain. Monitor radon emanation water properties and level in wells, especially in close association with other monitoring systems. Monitor apparent resistivity, magnetic field to determine whether precursory variations in these field occur. Monitor