Highway Maintenance Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highway Maintenance Policy Controlled Document. Copy No…………………. Issued to ………………… MAJOR PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE POLICY H ghways % L ght ng Assets August 18 INDEX Page Foreword 2 THE HIGHWAY NETWORK AND HIERARCHY 3 The H ghway Network ,oute Length 3 Network H erarchy 3 Carr ageway H erarchy 4 Pr nc pal ,oads 4 Non Pr nc pal ,oads . /nclass f ed L nk ,oads . /nclass f ed Local Access ,oads 8 H ghway Class f cat on Map 1Append 2 34 Footway H erarchy 5 Prest ge Walk ng 6ones 10 Pr mary Walk ng ,outes 11 Secondary Walk ng ,outes 14 Cycle Network 17 TRAFFIC SENSITIVE STREETS 18 Spec al Areas 18 Traff c Sens t ve Street ,estr ct ons 15 HIGHWAY INSPECTIONS 23 The H ghway Inspectors ,ole 24 Frequency of Inspect ons 2. Safety Inspect on ,epa r T mescales 25 Safety Inspect on Gu de 30 Intervent on Levels For Other H ghway Elements 31 ,egulatory Inspect ons 34 Defect ve Works 1Sect on 714 34 Performance ,equ rements 34 /nsafe Work ng Pract ces 3. /nsat sfactory Apparatus 1Sect on 814 3. Street Author ty Powers 3. Enforcement of the H ghways Act 1580 36 The ssue of Perm ts 37 Page NETWORK SAFETY 40 Sk dd ng ,es stance of ,oad Surfaces 40 Invest gatory Levels 43 W nter Serv ce 44 Network Dra nage 44 Equality Impact Assessment 44 THIRD PARTY CLAIMS 4. Deal ng w th Th rd Party Cla ms 4. ,ecords and Arch ves 47 GLOSSARY 48 Foreword The publ c’s v ews on the cond t on of roads and footpaths f gure prom nently n nat onal and local op n on polls and are frequently dent f ed as major sources of d ssat sfact on w th a Local Author ty’s performance. 3est Value w ll, through the publ cat on of the performance nd cators, further h ghl ght any shortcom ngs n a Local Author ty’s serv ce del very. Prov d ng a h gh standard of ma ntenance to the h ghway network requ res close co- operat on between several sect ons of the Counc l. In t ally, appropr ate standards have to be set and approved and an nventory produced. The network then has to be nspected at the correct frequenc es wh ch are determ ned by the network h erarchy. Any necessary repa rs are dent f ed and the work t cket s ssued to the contractor who carr es out the repa r to a requ red standard w th n a g ven t mescale. Performance needs to be mon tored and rev sed, when necessary, to mprove del very of the serv ce. It s essent al that all dec s ons and act ons are recorded w th regards to all works on the publ c h ghway regardless of the r promoter and arch ved n case they are needed n defense of th rd party cla msC these deta ls are currently recorded n the Author ty’s Street Works ,eg ster wh ch n turn must be made ava lable to the publ c. Th s document has been produced n order to prov de gu del nes to all off cers w th respons b l ty for the management and ma ntenance of the H ghway Network and to ass st them n the course of the r day to day dut es. The follow ng statutory requ rements apply to any person or party carry ng out any type of work on or adjacent to the C ty’s h ghway network. Any works carr ed out on the H ghway Network shall conform to the requ rements ofD • The Health and Safety at Work Act 1574. • Management of Health and Safety at Work ,egulat ons 1555. • Construct on 1Des gn and Management4 ,egulat ons 201.. • Chapter 8 of the Traff c S gns Manual 115864. • The New ,oads and Street Works Act, 1551. • The H ghways Act,1580 • The Traff c Management Act 2004. • Equal t es Act 2010. Corporate Health and Safety off cers w ll prov de ass stance and gu dance on any safety ssues relat ng to the H ghway Network. 2 3 THE HIGHWAY NETWORK AND HIERARCHY The Highway Network (Route Length) The C ty’s H ghway Network s deemed to be 100E urban and compr sesD- • Trunk ,oads A63/A1033 1funded and ma nta ned by the H ghways Agency4 1. km. • Pr nc pal ,oads 1A4 .2 km • Non-Pr nc pal ,oads 134 12 km 1C4 60 km • L nk ,oads 1/4 100 km 1/4 .04 km • Footways 1.31 km • Cycletracks 1remote from the carr ageway4 31 km • Hous ng Footways 260 km Network Hierarchy. The GWell-managed H ghway Infrastructure’ Code of Pract ce for H ghway Ma ntenance 1October 20164 1here nafter referred to the CoP4 states that a properly establ shed Network H erarchy prov des the foundat on for a coherent, cons stent and aud table ma ntenance strategy. The parameters for n t ally determ n ng a network h erarchy, wh ch are well def ned n the CoP, are br efly descr bed as followsD- Carriageways Footways Cycle ways DfT ,oad H erarchy Category H erarchy Category H erarchy Class H erarchy Descr pt on Descr pt on Descr pt on 1 Motorways 1a Prest ge A Cycle lane Walk ng form ng part of 6one the C ty Centre carr ageway 3 A 2 Strateg c 1 Pr mary 3 Cycle Track ,oute Walk ng ,oute 4 3 3a Ma n 2 Secondary C Cycle Tra l D str butor Walk ng ,oads ,oute . C 3b Secondary 3 L nk ,oads D str butor ,oads 6 / 4a L nk ,oad 4 Local 6 / 4b Local Access Access ,oads ,oads 4 The CoP recommends that the Author ty should also cons der local ssues when des gnat ng h erarch es. It stresses that t s mportant that the h erarchy adopted by a H ghway Author ty reflects the needs and pr or t es for each nd v dual part of the network and for ts users. In add t on, t s essent al that consultat on s undertaken w th the Author ty’s Asset Development Team when des gnat ng h erarch es. The whole of the C ty’s H ghway Network has been assessed us ng both the CoP as gu dance and n consultat on w th network users e.g. Passenger Transport, safe routes to schools, H ghway Development Control, Transport Strategy etc. to dent fy local needs and pr or t es. The network h erarchy, dent f ed on the follow ng pages, has now been establ shed and sets the nspect on reg me. However, t should be borne n m nd that w th the redevelopment and regenerat on that s cont nually tak ng place n the c ty the h erarchy w ll need to be reassessed at regular ntervals. To ensure that the network h erarchy s ma nta ned at the appropr ate level, each safety nspect on undertaken w ll nclude recommendat ons for suggestedH changes to the current h erarchy for each nd v dual street. These recommendat ons w ll be cons dered on a monthly bas s by the H ghway Network Management Team who w ll mplement any changes to the network h erarchy that are deemed appropr ate. Carriageway Hierarchy Principal Roads (Category 2 Strategic Route) A Pr nc pal ,oad s des gnated as be ng of suff c ent mportance w th n the nat onal h erarchy to just fy pr nc pal status. Part al fund ng for cap tal ma ntenance of Pr nc pal ,oads s ava lable from Central Government through the Local Transport Plan process. The Pr nc pal ,oad Network w th n the C ty compr ses of the follow ng routesD • A1075, Ferensway, from A63 to junct on w th Spr ng 3ank. • A1075, 3everley ,oad, from Spr ng 3ank junct on to C ty boundary. • A16., Freetown Way and George Street, from Spr ng 3ank junct on to North 3r dge. • A16., W tham, Holderness ,oad and Ganstead Lane, from North 3r dge to C ty boundary. • A110., Anlaby ,oad, from Ferensway to 3oothferry ,oad. • A110., 3oothferry ,oad, from Anlaby ,oad to C ty boundary. • A1166, 3r ghton Street, Hessle ,oad 1over flyover4, Askew Avenue. • A1033, Mount Pleasant, Stoneferry ,oad, Holwell ,oad, Sutton ,oad 1between Holwell and Ennerdale roundabouts4, Thomas Clarkson Way and ,a ch Carter Way 1to Ennerdale 3r dge4. • A116., Great /n on Street 1 nclud ng Clarence Street4, New Cleveland Street, Cleveland Street. • A116., Clough ,oad and Ferry Lane. Non-Principal Roads. Main Distributor Roads 1Category 3a Main Distributor roads) are as followsD • 31237 ,obson Way • 31237 Leads ,oad • 31237 Salthouse ,oad • 31231 Anlaby ,oad 13oothferry ,oad roundabout to boundary4 • 31233 Cott ngham ,oad • 31238 Ma n ,oad 3 lton • 31401 P cker ng ,oad 13oothferry ,oad to Hessle ,oad4 Secondary Distributor Roads (Category 3b Secondary Distributor roads) are as followsD • West Dock Street • Goulton Street • Walcott Street • Hessle ,oad 1,awl ng Way to Hawthorne Ave4 • Iackson Street, Engl sh Street, Commerc al ,oad • St Georges ,oad • Albert Ave • North ,oad, Calvert Lane, Calvert ,oad, Pr ory ,oad • Spr ng 3ank, Spr ng 3ank West, W llerby ,oad • Pr nces Ave, Jueens ,oad • Chanterlands Ave, 3r cknell Ave • County ,oad South % North, Fa rfa2 Ave, Hall ,oad, Sutton ,oad • Holwell ,oad, 1north of Sutton ,oad4 Wawne ,oad • Sutton ,oad, Cavend sh ,oad, Ings ,oad, Maybury ,oad, Marfleet Lane • Southcoates Lane, Preston ,oad • Laburnum Ave, Chamberla n ,oad • Old Hedon ,oad • Clarence Street, Alfred Gelder Street, Lowgate, Market Place • Hessle ,oad 1West of Askew Ave4 Unclassified Link Roads (Category 4a 4 A new class f cat on to spl t the unclass f ed roads up nto those that l nk the res dent al streets and are ma nly bus routes and those rema n ng streets that are solely res dent al.
Recommended publications
  • Hull Development Framework
    HDF Hull Development Framework Core Strategy Volume 2: HDF report on engagement Hull Core Strategy issues-options October 2008 1 Report on engagement on the Hull Core Strategy 7. Views have also been sought from a series of ‘road show’ issues/options stage events which included a mobile exhibition involving a short DVD presentation at 4 venues across the city at East Park, 1. Purpose Queen Victoria Square, Pearson Park and North Point generally targeted to cover north, central, west and east Hull, 2. Purpose of this report is to inform others about the progress including over weekends. A number of local ‘drop in’ events made and feedback from the community, in developing a new also took place including a mini-exhibition and ‘looped’ DVD at broad plan for the city. It carries forward a report on all the Customer Services Centres across the city, which engagement (completed in June 2008) which is separately introduced the main issues, objectives and options. available and content of which has been taken into account in drafting the issues/options report and wider implications taken 9. At these recent events over 2,500 leaflets (with into account in the next draft ‘preferred approach’ stage. questionnaires) were distributed to individual members of the public which prompted discussion and debate along with 3. Key significant issues raised over a six week consultation written feedback. period undertaken in August/September are outlined below, along with the Council response to these as outlined in italics. 10. Over 1,000 Core Strategy issues/options documents were These, along with other detailed matters raised, are being also circulated to key stakeholders asking for their views and considered as part of the next draft ‘preferred approach’ plan preferences from the options raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Long / Short Yellow Pages
    MARFLEET 20/00566/FULL Land To The South, Preston Road, Kingston Upon Hull, , A hybrid planning application comprising:-, 1) Full planning application for residential development (242) dwellings, public and private access roads, public and private landscaping, recreational facilities and associated drainage works., 2) Outline planning application for residential development (all matters reserved except for access). c/o Strata Homes Ltd SUMMARY - Hybrid application for housing and associated development. - Objections received. Including holding objection from Highways England. - Recommended for conditional approval. Deferred to Head of Planning following withdrawal of Highways England objection. – Subject to a legal agreement to secure off-site tree planting - The Head of Planning has requested a Committee decision and site visit due to significance of the application. SITE The Site is located to the south of Preston Road, Archbishop Sentamu Academy and other facilities to the north off this double width roadway. Marfleet Lane running to Flinton Grove to the east. The southern boundary incorporates the properties to the south of St John’s Grove up to the junction of Hilton Grove and then follows an irregular line northward to Wansford Grove around properties to be retained. The western boundary is defined by Holderness Drain. The Site extends to approximately 16.08ha of brownfield (previously developed) scrubland. The site once formed part of wider residential development on the Preston Road Estate but has been cleared except for four properties, which are still occupied by their owners. It is understood that HCC is going through the Compulsory Purchase Order (“CPO”) process to acquire these last houses on the Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Strata/Keepmoat/Home Group Proposed Residential
    traffic engineering and transport planning Strata /Keepmoat/Home Group Proposed Residential Red evelopment Land South of Preston Road, Hull Travel Plan April 20 20 Armstrong House, The Flemingate Centre, Beverley, HU17 0NW 01482 679 911 info@local -transport -projects.co.uk www.local -transport -projects.co.uk Registered No. 5295328 Strata/Keepmoat/Home Group Proposed Residential Red evelopment Land South of Preston Road, Hull Travel Plan April 2020 Client Commission Client: Strata /Keepmoat/Home Group Date Commissioned: September 201 9 LTP Quality Control Job No: LTP/19 /318 5 File Ref: Preston Road Hull TP Final Issue 1 Issue Revision Description Author Checked Date 1 - Final issue for planning ZB MR/SW 06/04/20 20 Authorised for Issue: TK LTP PROJECT TEAM As part of our commitment to quality the following team of transport professionals was assembled specifically for the deliver y of this project . Relevant qualifications are shown and CV s are available upon request to demonstrate our experience and credentials. Team Member LTP Designation Qualifications Tony Kirby Director (Project Manager) IEng MSc MCIHT FIHE Steven Windass Head of Transport Planning BSc(Hons) MSc(Eng) CEng F IHE MCIHT Mike Raynor Senior Transport Planner BA(Hons) MIHE Zoe Boote Transport Planner BA(Hons) AMIHE The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced, in whole or in part, without the written consent of Local Tra nsport Projects Ltd. Document C ontrol www.local -transport -projects.co.uk Proposed Residential Redevelopment Land South of Preston Road, Hull Travel Plan PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL RE DEVELOPMENT LAND SOUTH OF PRESTON ROAD, HULL TRAVEL PLAN CONTEN TS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Brooks, Joanna, Bravington, Alison, Rodriguez, Alison, King, Nigel and Percy-Smith, Barry Public Health Participatory Research Project using an Assets Approach: Final report to funder Original Citation Brooks, Joanna, Bravington, Alison, Rodriguez, Alison, King, Nigel and Percy-Smith, Barry (2015) Public Health Participatory Research Project using an Assets Approach: Final report to funder. Project Report. University of Huddersfield. (Unpublished) This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/24816/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Hull Public Health Qualitative Research Project Final Report to Hull City Council Public Health Team, March 2015 Dr Joanna Brooks, Ms Alison Bravington, Dr Alison Rodriguez, Professor Nigel King, Professor Barry Percy-Smith ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work described in this report was commissioned by Hull City Council‟s Public Health team.
    [Show full text]
  • Hull, the Liberal Democrat
    Liberal Democrat Warding Submission – 27 October 2016 0 Local Government Boundary Commission for England 2016 Electoral Review of Hull City Council Liberal Democrat Warding Submission 27 October 2016 Liberal Democrat Warding Submission – 27 October 2016 1 Contents Page 1) Introduction 2 2) The River Hull – Primary Community Divide 3 3) Character of the city 4 4) 2001 Electoral Review 5 5) Requirement for Change 6 6) Basic principles of the Submission 7 7) Option A – Overview of the Proposal 9 8) Option A – Detailed Overview of the Proposed Wards 11 Wards West of the River Hull 12 a) Avenue Ward 13 b) Beverley Ward 16 c) Boothferry Ward 19 d) Cottingham Ward 24 e) Derringham Ward 29 f) Myton Ward 31 g) Newington and St Andrews Ward 35 h) Orchard Park Ward 38 i) Pickering Ward 41 j) University Ward 44 Wards East of the River Hull 49 a) Bransholme Ward 50 b) Drypool Ward 53 c) Holderness Ward 55 d) Ings Ward 57 e) Kings Park Ward 59 f) Longhill Ward 62 g) Marfleet Ward 65 h) Southcoates Ward 68 i) Sutton Ward 70 j) Wawne Ward 73 9) Option B – Overview of the proposal 77 a) Bransholme East Ward 79 b) Bransholme West Ward 82 c) Sutton Ward 85 10) Conclusion 89 Appendix – Supporting Evidence: Maps and Tables 90-107 Liberal Democrat Warding Submission – 27 October 2016 2 1) Introduction a) In submitting the warding proposal, the Liberal Democrats have met the requirements set out in the 2014 Electoral Reviews: Technical Guidance and legislation. In particular, they have taken note of Schedule 2 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoenvironmental Appraisal
    Geoenvironmental Appraisal Land at Preston Road, Hull For Keepmoat Homes Yorkshire East & Strata Homes Report no: 3039/1 Date: January 2019 Tel: 01937 545330 • [email protected] • www.lithos.co.uk SUMMARY OF GEOENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Job No. 3039 Site area/ha 16 hectares Client: Keepmoat Homes Yorkshire East & Strata Homes NGR: TA 135 302 Site: Preston Road, Hull Nearest postcode: HU9 5UN The site is located approximately 4km east of Hull city centre comprises part of the Preston Road Housing Estate. Prior to the ongoing demolition programme there were about 500 houses (256 pairs of semi-detached, 2-storey properties); about 50% of buildings across the site had been demolished; about 50% were vacant but remained standing; and about 1% remained occupied. Existing (and recently demolished) houses built in the 1930s were constructed on shallow (c. 0.5m deep) strip footings, and no obvious signs of structural distress were noted during the walkover. Lithos were commissioned to provide a geoenvironmental appraisal of the site, which it is understood is to be redeveloped with residential dwellings. Lithos’ investigation included a review of the site's history and environmental setting, and a ground investigation comprising 79 trial pits, 10 deep cable percussion boreholes and 40 road cores with dynamic sample follow-on. A summary of salient geoenvironmental issues is provided in the table below. Issue Remarks The site can be divided into three areas based on ground conditions – Area A (housing recently Areas cleared), Area B (houses remain) and Area C (existing estate roads). A veneer of Demolition Arisings or Made Ground Topsoil to depths of up to 1.1m, but typically c.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Democratic Services, Hull City Council, the Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull, HU1 2AA DX: 1
    Please ask for: Nikki Stocks Telephone: 01482 613421 Fax: 01482 613110 Email: [email protected] Text phone: 01482 300349 Date: Tuesday, 18 February 2014 Dear Councillor, Park Area Committee The next meeting of the Park Area Committee will be held at 09:30 on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 in Veterans' Pavilion, East Park, Holderness Road, Hull . The Agenda for the meeting is attached and reports are enclosed where relevant. Please Note: It is likely that the public, (including the Press) will be excluded from the meeting during discussions of exempt items since they involve the possible disclosure of exempt information as describe in Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. Yours faithfully, Democratic Services Officer for the Chief Executive Legal and Democratic Services, Hull City Council, The Guildhall, AlfredPage Gelder 1 of 236Street, Hull, HU1 2AA www.hullcc.gov.uk DX: 11934 HULL 1 Tel: 01482 300300 Park Area Committee To: Membership: Councillors S Brady, S Chaytor, D Gemmell, M Glew, J Hornby, G Kennett, T McVie, R. Pantelakis and C Sumpton Officers: Mark McEgan, Area Director for East and Park Debbie Akester, Community Manager for Park (3) Nikki Stocks, Democratic Services Officer (5) Public Set: Reference Library Inspector Ogden, Bransholme Police Station Alerts: Councillor J Hewitt, Portfolio Holder for Customer and Neighbourhood Services Chief Executives Office, Kingston upon Hull City Council Councillor M Ross, Leader of the Majority Opposition Guildhall Reception Press Office Group Secretariats Tom Clay, Political Assistant Viking Radio – [email protected] Yorkshire Post – [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] Radio Humberside – [email protected] Hull Daily Mail – [email protected] & [email protected] KCFM Radio – [email protected] Page 2 of 236 Park Area Committee 09:30 on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 Veterans' Pavilion, East Park, Holderness Road, Hull A G E N D A PROCEDURAL ITEMS 1 Apologies To receive apologies for those Members who are unable to attend the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Information Pack
    Vehicle Crossings Customer Information Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding constructing a vehicle crossing at your address. This information pack contains all the information you need to obtain a quotation for a crossing from an approved contractor. Hull City Council now allows vehicle crossings to be constructed by a number of approved contractors through the issuing of a road works permit. General Information • It is important to remember that once a crossing has been constructed it remains part of the highway and Hull City Council will be responsible for its maintenance, in addition parking is not permitted on the crossing once it has been constructed. Your vehicle must not overhang the footpath when you park within your property. • Crossings are constructed in tarmac however in some instances other materials may be approved for use. • If after completion of your vehicle crossing you encounter problems with other vehicles obstructing the access on a regular basis, and this persists over a prolonged period of 6 weeks or more, you should contact the Transport Development Team via Hull City Councils call centre on telephone number 01482 300300 who will advise on any action that can be taken. • Please note it is an offence to construct a vehicle footpath crossing without the appropriate approval and roadworks permit. To do so may result in prosecution. • Access from certain streets is restricted see page 7 for details. • You may need planning permission – please read the following notes carefully. 1 April 2014 How To Obtain A Quotation Step 1 – Do I need planning permission? If your crossing is to be constructed on a classified road or in the Avenues Conservation Area, planning permission will be required.
    [Show full text]