Open June 17A 2011 Draft--Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open June 17A 2011 Draft--Final The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Education FY 2010: THE RESPONSE OF THE IN-HOUSE LOBBYISTS AT THE STATE- RELATED RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA TO AN ECONOMIC CRISIS A Dissertation in Higher Education by Tyrone H. Glade © 2011 Tyrone H. Glade Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education August 2011 The dissertation of Tyrone H. Glade was reviewed and approved* by the following: Dorothy Evensen Professor of Education Professor-in-Charge of the Higher Education Program Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Robert Hendrickson Professor of Education Nona Prestine Professor of Education Jacqueline Edmondson Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Graduate Studies, College of Education *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to understand: 1) how the in-house lobbyists of Pennsylvania‘s state-related public research universities dealt with an economic crisis as it affected the FY 2009-2010 appropriation process; and 2) how the in-house lobbyists at the state- related public research universities of Pennsylvania defined successful lobbying during an economic crisis? The state-related public research universities of Pennsylvania include: Penn State University, Temple University, and the University of Pittsburgh. The political perspective as described by Pfeffer (1981; 1992), Bolman and Deal (2008), Oliver (1991), and others served as the conceptual framework for this study. The political perspective views conflict between individuals and/or organizations as normal because of heterogeneous goals and scarce resources. Power becomes an important asset in determining what goals are pursued and allocation of resources. Resolution of conflict in not emphasized in the political perspective whereas the use of tactics and strategies to increase power are. To answer the questions, a qualitative case study was used. A document analysis was used to describe the economic crisis as it affected Pennsylvania, the FY 2009-2010 appropriation process, and the state-related public research universities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the in-house lobbyists at the state-related public research universities of Pennsylvania to gain their perspectives on the economic crisis and defining success. Analysis of the data revealed that the in-house lobbyist used a number of tactics and strategies to influence legislators during the contentious FY 2009-2010 appropriation process. They used rational arguments in value creation or value claiming terms; and given the economic realities being faced in the Commonwealth and the antagonistic proposals of the governor, many iii of the arguments were value claiming in nature. The importance of allies and friends at the statehouse, at the institution, and outside of the institution became apparent. The in-house lobbyists defined the FY 2009-2010 budgetary process as successful given the context of the economic crisis. Many of the successes achieved during the appropriation process were defensive in nature. Underlying successful lobbying was the importance of building relationships with legislators and other government officials. iv Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................x Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ xi CHAPTER I: Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 Appropriations for Higher Education in the United States ...........................................................6 Higher Education Lobbying ..........................................................................................................8 Research Questions and Methodological Considerations ...........................................................11 Conceptual Framework ...............................................................................................................13 Significance of Study ..................................................................................................................14 CHAPTER II: Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework .................................................16 What is Lobbying? .....................................................................................................................16 What is a Lobbyist? ....................................................................................................................17 A Brief History of Lobbying in the United States .....................................................................18 Lobbying Success in the Legislative Branch .............................................................................20 Lobbying Success in the Legislative Branch at the State Level ........................................24 Research on the Lobbyists Themselves .....................................................................................24 What Lobbyists Do—The Nature of Their Work ..............................................................25 What Lobbyists Do—Tactics They Use ............................................................................27 What Lobbyists Do—Explaining Their Actions to the Organizations They Serve ..........27 Research on Higher Education Lobbying and Lobbyists ...........................................................28 Higher Education Lobbying and State Appropriations ......................................................29 Dissertations that Examine Higher Education Lobbying...................................................29 Research on Higher Education Lobbyists ..........................................................................30 Tactics Used by Higher Education Lobbyists ...................................................................30 The State Environment and its Effect on State Higher Education Appropriations ....................31 Effect of Economic and Demographic Variables on State Appropriations .......................32 Effect of Political Variables on State Appropriations........................................................33 Summary of Research ................................................................................................................34 Conceptual Framework ..............................................................................................................35 Sources of Power: Strategies and Tactics to Gain or Increase Power ...............................40 Sources of Power ...................................................................................................41 Strategies and Tactics ............................................................................................45 Summary of Conceptual Framework ..........................................................................................47 CHAPTER III: Method ..................................................................................................................49 Case Study Method .....................................................................................................................49 Participant Selection ...................................................................................................................51 Data Collection ...........................................................................................................................52 Data Analysis ..............................................................................................................................56 Data Verification ................................................................................................................57 Role and Placement of the Researcher........................................................................................58 v Researcher Bias ..................................................................................................................59 Summary .....................................................................................................................................59 CHAPTER IV: The Context ..........................................................................................................61 Creating a State Budget in Pennsylvania ....................................................................................61 Passing a Bill in Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................66 Historical Financial Relationship between Pennsylvania and the State-Related Universities ...69 Appropriations for the State-Related Universities Today ...........................................................75 Higher Education in Pennsylvania Today...................................................................................76 The State-Related Universities ..........................................................................................79 Competition for State Dollars and Students Among Public Institutions ...........................82 The Financial Crisis in Pennsylvania and its Effect on FY 2010 ...............................................85 The Passage of the FY 2009 Budget .................................................................................85
Recommended publications
  • Pennsylvania MEDICAL SOCIETY ZQQ0JUH28 M 8" 56 PREVIEW Coiinissibwe DONALD H
    Pennsylvania MEDICAL SOCIETY ZQQ0JUH28 m 8" 56 PREVIEW coiinissibWe DONALD H. SMITH, MD June 26, 2000 President CAROL E. ROSE, MD Commissioner John R. McGinley, Jr., Chair President Elect Independent Regulatory Review Commission 14th Floor, 333 Market Street HOWARD A. RICHTER, MD Original: 2064 Vice President Harrisburg, PA 17101 JAMES R. REGAN, MD Re: Final Rulemaking: State Board of Medicine State Board of Nursing CRNP Prescriptive Authority (16A-499) JITENDRAM. DESAI, MD Secretary Dear Commissioner: ROGER F. MECUM Executive Vice President I am writing as President of the Pennsylvania Medical Society to support the proposed final rulemaking of the State Boards of Medicine and Nursing related to prescriptive authority for certified registered nurse practitioners (CRNPs) currently before the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC). The Boards are to be congratulated for their efforts which have resulted in the regulations before you for consideration. We understand that the Boards are continuing to clarify the regulations and their implementation, including the method nurse practitioners may utilize to request a waiver from the physician supervision limitation. The regulations in their current form address the educational quality and safety concerns raised by the Medical Society during the comment process. The Society urges the approval of these regulations by the IRRC. Sincerely, 777 East Park Drive Donald H. Smith, MD President P.O. Box 8820 Cc: The Honorable Clarence Bell, Chair Harrisburg, PA 17105-8820 Senate Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee The Honorable Mario Civera, Chair House Professional Licensure Committee Charles D. Hummer, MD, Chair Tel: 717-558-7750 State Board of Medicine Robert Muscalus, DO Fax: 717-558-7840 Physician General K.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE HEARING STATE CAPITOL MAJORITY CAUCUS ROOM ROOM 140 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2009 2:10 P.M. VOLUME IV OF IV PRESENTATION BY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS BEFORE: HONORABLE DWIGHT EVANS, MAJORITY CHAIRMAN HONORABLE MATTHEW D. BRADFORD HONORABLE TIM BRIGGS HONORABLE H. SCOTT CONKLIN HONORABLE DAN FRANKEL HONORABLE JOHN T. GALLOWAY HONORABLE WILLIAM F. KELLER HONORABLE WILLIAM C. KORTZ II HONORABLE DEBERAH KULA HONORABLE BRYAN R. LENTZ HONORABLE KATHY MANDERINO HONORABLE CHERELLE L. PARKER HONORABLE JOSH SHAPIRO HONORABLE JOHN J. SIPTROTH HONORABLE GREG VITALI HONORABLE JAKE WHEATLEY HONORABLE JEWELL WILLIAMS ————————— JEAN DAVIS REPORTING 7786 Hanoverdale Drive • Harrisburg, PA 17112 Phone (717)503-6568 • Fax (717)566-7760 2 1 BEFORE (cont.'d): HONORABLE MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., MINORITY CHAIRMAN 2 HONORABLE GORDON DENLINGER HONORABLE BRIAN L. ELLIS 3 HONORABLE JOHN R. EVANS HONORABLE MAUREE GINGRICH 4 HONORABLE THOMAS H. KILLION HONORABLE DAVID R. MILLARD 5 HONORABLE RON MILLER HONORABLE SCOTT A. PETRI 6 HONORABLE DAVE REED HONORABLE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY 7 HONORABLE MARIO M. SCAVELLO HONORABLE RICHARD R. STEVENSON 8 HONORABLE KATIE TRUE 9 ALSO PRESENT: 10 MIRIAM A. FOX MAJORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 11 EDWARD J. NOLAN MINORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 12 13 DEBRA B. MILLER 14 REPORTER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 I N D E X 2 TESTIFIERS 3 NAME PAGE 4 MAJ. GEN. JESSICA L. WRIGHT 5 ADJUTANT GENERAL, PA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS................4 6 DEBBIE STUBLJAR 7 DEPUTY FOR ADMINISTRATION, PA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS...............11 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 * * * 3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN EVANS: I would like to 4 reconvene the House Appropriations Committee 5 meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Legislative Journal
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2003 SESSION OF 2003 187TH OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY No. 27 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Save us all from the freedom of mere independence, and The House convened at 11 a.m., e.d.t. enable us to employ responsibility in our every decision. In a time when some still surrender easily, give us the convictions worthy of the courage we profess. Make us able to bear rule, to THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE wear the name “Representative” not as a cloak of power but as a (PATRICIA H. VANCE) PRESIDING seamless robe of integrity, knowing that while all fail, yet it remains so that our first call is to our own selves that we be true. PRAYER We would ask that we may dare to challenge injustice, to champion unpopular causes, and to buck the status quo. REV. JULIANN V. WHIPPLE, Chaplain of the House of For this day, this place, our life, strength, and health, we Representatives, offered the following prayer: praise You, O God. For good fellowship and honest disagreement in freedom and for those who make it possible, we Let us pray: give You thanks. Praise be to You, O God, now and forever. God of all worlds and lands, Lord of every nation and Amen. people, before we forget You, we pause to remember. Creator God, for this beautiful spring day, we lift our thanks. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE It is a powerful reminder that after every dark and cold winter comes the warmth of Your sun and the renewed beauty of Your (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by members and creation, coming alive with bursts of colors and scents for visitors.) which we have been waiting with eager anticipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE HEARING STATE CAPITOL MAJORITY CAUCUS ROOM ROOM 140 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA FRIDAY, MAY 22, 2009 9:00 A.M. PRESENTATION ON SENATE BILL 850 VOLUME I OF IX BEFORE: HONORABLE DWIGHT EVANS, MAJORITY CHAIRMAN HONORABLE WILLIAM C. KORTZ III HONORABLE DEBERAH KULA HONORABLE TIM MAHONEY HONORABLE JOSH SHAPIRO HONORABLE MATTHEW SMITH HONORABLE MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., MINORITY CHAIRMAN HONORABLE GORDON DENLINGER HONORABLE JOHN R. EVANS HONORABLE MAUREE GINGRICH HONORABLE DAVID R. MILLARD HONORABLE RON MILLER HONORABLE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY HONORABLE RICHARD R. STEVENSON ALSO IN ATTENDANCE: HONORABLE KEVIN P. MURPHY ————————— JEAN DAVIS REPORTING 7786 Hanoverdale Drive • Harrisburg, PA 17112 Phone (717)503-6568 • Fax (717)566-7760 2 1 ALSO PRESENT: MIRIAM A. FOX 2 MAJORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EDWARD J. NOLAN 3 MINORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 4 5 HEATHER L. ARTZ, RMR, CRR REPORTER 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 I N D E X 2 TESTIFIERS 3 NAME PAGE 4 Joel Rotz 5 5 Gene Barr 10 6 Secretary George Cornelius 16 7 John Oliver 22 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 * * * 3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN EVANS: I'd like to ask 4 the panel to join us at the table there, please. Now 5 the hour being 9:00, we'll reconvene the House 6 Appropriations Committee public hearing on Senate 7 Bill 850.
    [Show full text]
  • Center on Regional Politics Bulletin | Volume 5, Number 1 | Spring 2016
    Center On Regional Politics Bulletin Volume 5, Number 1 | Summer 2016 A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR CORP PENSION UPDATE: MOUNTING LIABILITIES WITH MODEST SIGNS OF PROGRESS The interrelated problems of adequately funding public pensions and public schools continue to weigh on Pennsyl- A new CORP Issue Memo documents the still growing vanians, as reports summarized in this bulletin suggest. Both unfunded liabilities of Pennsylvania’s state and local pension problems reflect what I call the cost of politics. They add up funds and summarizes approaches in the Commonwealth to roughly $3 billion a year that could have been used to and elsewhere to reduce burdens that will be weighing on improve schools or cut taxes or perhaps both. Our new taxpayers and citizens for years to come. The bad news report on pensions shows that the unfunded liability of our is that Pennsylvania’s combined state and local unfunded state and municipal plans now exceeds $60 billion. Our new liability tops $60 billion and with record low fund earnings report on fund balances for all 500 school districts shows last year, appears to be headed in the wrong direction. The that most have inadequate reserves to meet emergencies or good news is that there are signs of progress, albeit modest, pay higher pension costs stretching far into the future. including some ideas surfaced in CORP reports. How do I calculate the cost of politics? The Basic Education Entitled “The Problem of Funding Pensions: An Update,” Funding Commission concluded that our decades old policy the report, issued in June 2016, identifies five categories of of providing “hold harmless” funding to districts losing stu- reforms being tried or adopted in Pennsylvania and in other dents is misallocating $1 billion a year but in fairness cannot states and cities around the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Drexel-At-Large 2008 (OGCR Annual Report) [PDF]
    Drexel @@LLAARRGGEE DREXEL UNIIVERSIITY’’S OFFIICE OF GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNIITY RELATIIONS ANNUAL REPORT • 2007 – 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate at Drexel Message from the Vice President n Tuesday, October 30, 2007, he Office of Government and TCommunity Relations was Drexel University hosted one of very busy in 2007. I would like to take this opportunity to highlight the biggest and most exciting some of our accomplishments O since last year’s publication. events in the history of the University – We organized two prestigious events at our University. On May 4, 2007, Drexel University the Democratic Presidential Candidates hosted the 2007 Philadelphia Democratic Primary Mayoral Debate. Our faculty, staff, stu - Debate. The debate, which took place dents and guests had the chance to see the can - didates live and listen to their proposed plans of action if elected the next mayor of the City of in the Main Auditorium, was broadcast Philadelphia. Bob Brady, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, Tom Knox and Michael Nutter faced off live nationally on MSNBC. continued on page 4 in a fast-paced, frequently contentious debate. The debate was televised live by Channel 6, President Papadakis with Drexel Student volunteers at the Debate WPVI-TV. On October 30, 2007, Drexel University was the host of the 2008 Democratic Presidential Debate, one of the biggest events in the university’s histo - ry. We were thrilled to welcome the candidates to our great City of Philadelphia and host them on our campus for a night of political discourse. Joseph Biden, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, Barack Obama and continued on page 2 President Papadakis congratulates Drexel’s Vice President Brian T.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE HEARING STATE CAPITOL MAJORITY CAUCUS ROOM ROOM 140 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2009 9:00 A.M. VOLUME I OF IV PRESENTATION BY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE BEFORE: HONORABLE DWIGHT EVANS, MAJORITY CHAIRMAN HONORABLE MATTHEW D. BRADFORD HONORABLE TIM BRIGGS HONORABLE H. SCOTT CONKLIN HONORABLE DAN FRANKEL HONORABLE JOHN T. GALLOWAY HONORABLE WILLIAM F. KELLER HONORABLE WILLIAM C. KORTZ II HONORABLE DEBERAH KULA HONORABLE BRYAN R. LENTZ HONORABLE KATHY MANDERINO HONORABLE CHERELLE L. PARKER HONORABLE JOSH SHAPIRO HONORABLE JOHN J. SIPTROTH HONORABLE GREG VITALI HONORABLE JAKE WHEATLEY HONORABLE JEWELL WILLIAMS ————————— JEAN DAVIS REPORTING 7786 Hanoverdale Drive • Harrisburg, PA 17112 Phone (717)503-6568 • Fax (717)566-7760 2 1 BEFORE (cont.'d): HONORABLE MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., MINORITY CHAIRMAN 2 HONORABLE GORDON DENLINGER HONORABLE BRIAN L. ELLIS 3 HONORABLE JOHN R. EVANS HONORABLE MAUREE GINGRICH 4 HONORABLE THOMAS H. KILLION HONORABLE DAVID R. MILLARD 5 HONORABLE RON MILLER HONORABLE SCOTT A. PETRI 6 HONORABLE DAVE REED HONORABLE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY 7 HONORABLE MARIO M. SCAVELLO HONORABLE RICHARD R. STEVENSON 8 HONORABLE KATIE TRUE 9 ALSO PRESENT: 10 DEBBIE REEVES MAJORITY BUDGET ANALYST 11 EDWARD J. NOLAN MINORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 12 13 JEAN M. DAVIS, REPORTER 14 NOTARY PUBLIC 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 I N D E X 2 TESTIFIERS 3 NAME PAGE 4 JEFFREY A. BEARD, PH.D. 5 SECRETARY, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS....................4 6 CATHERINE C. McVEY 7 CHAIRMAN, PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE................4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 * * * 3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN EVANS: The hour of 4 9 o'clock having arrived, I would like to reconvene 5 the House Appropriations Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives Appropriations Committee Hearing Budget Hearing
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE HEARING BUDGET HEARING STATE CAPITOL MAJORITY CAUCUS ROOM HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2008, 11:30 A.M. VOLUME II OF VI PRESENTATION BY STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION BEFORE: HONORABLE DWIGHT EVANS, CHAIRMAN HONORABLE MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., CHAIRMAN HONORABLE STEPHEN E. BARRAR HONORABLE STEVEN W. CAPPELLI HONORABLE H. SCOTT CONKLIN HONORABLE CRAIG A. DALLY HONORABLE GORDON R. DENLINGER HONORABLE BRIAN ELLIS HONORABLE DAN B. FRANKEL HONORABLE JOHN T. GALLOWAY HONORABLE WILLIAM F. KELLER HONORABLE TIM MAHONEY HONORABLE KATHY M. MANDERINO HONORABLE FRED McILHATTAN HONORABLE DAVID R. MILLARD HONORABLE RON MILLER HONORABLE JOHN MYERS HONORABLE CHERELLE PARKER HONORABLE JOSEPH A. PETRARCA HONORABLE SCOTT A. PETRI HONORABLE SEAN M. RAMALEY 2 1 BEFORE (cont.'d): HONORABLE DAVE REED 2 HONORABLE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY HONORABLE DANTE SANTONI, JR. 3 HONORABLE MARIO M. SCAVELLO HONORABLE JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO 4 HONORABLE JOHN SIPTROTH HONORABLE MATTHEW SMITH 5 HONORABLE KATIE TRUE HONORABLE GREGORY S. VITALI 6 HONORABLE DON WALKO HONORABLE JAKE WHEATLEY, JR. 7 8 ALSO PRESENT: MIRIAM FOX 9 EDWARD NOLAN 10 11 JEAN M. DAVIS, REPORTER NOTARY PUBLIC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 I N D E X 2 TESTIFIERS 3 4 NAMES PAGE 5 DR. PETER H. GARLAND 4 6 STUDENT JOSEPH M. PELTZER 4 7 DR. ANGELO ARMENTI, JR. 27 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 CHAIRMAN EVANS: We will now reconvene the 2 House Appropriations Committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Center on Regional Politics Bulletin | Volume 2, Number 3| Fall 2013
    Center On Regional Politics Bulletin Volume 2, Number 3 | Fall 2013 A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR PUBLIC PENSIONS, SCHOOL FUNDING, AND ARTS AND CULTURE TOP CORP’S 2014 AGENDA As Temple’s Center on Regional Politics begins its second year, we look forward to working on ways to address two Continued work on reforming and funding public pensions, huge and inter-related challenges that face our region and helping rebuild Pennsylvania’s state education funding the Commonwealth: the rising costs of funding public formula, and identifying options to strengthen the arts and pensions and the increasing strains of adequately and fairly culture sector in Southeastern Pennsylvania top the 2014 funding public education. Polls shows schools are a top agenda for Temple’s Center on Regional Politics (CORP), as concern of voters. approved by its Executive Committee in November. Modest increases in the state’s basic education subsidy in the wake of the recession have been overtaken by even “These issues, all of which involve large public finance larger increases in the costs of funding the Public School challenges and could require the restructuring of delivery Employees’ Retirement System, which has an unfunded systems, have eluded durable solutions for many years,” liability of $29 billion. CORP’s Fall 2012 Issue Memo, said Joseph P. McLaughlin, Jr., center director, “despite January 2013 Board of Fellows Symposium, and June 2013 widespread agreement of their importance to the Working Group Report raised the visibility of the pension economy and quality of life in our region. problem, influenced the debate, and identified options. During 2014, we will attempt to build on that momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • 1434 Legislative Journal—House October 17
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2018 SESSION OF 2018 202D OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY No. 46 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE MESSAGE The House convened at 9:30 a.m., e.d.t. AMENDED HOUSE BILLS RETURNED FOR CONCURRENCE AND THE SPEAKER (MIKE TURZAI) REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON RULES PRESIDING The clerk of the Senate, being introduced, returned HB 26, PRAYER PN 4146; HB 99, PN 4254; HB 149, PN 4251; HB 353, PN 3779; HB 1013, PN 4069; HB 1511, PN 4253; HB 1885, HON. HARRY READSHAW, member of the House of PN 4255; and HB 2075, PN 4249, with information that the Representatives, offered the following prayer: Senate has passed the same with amendment in which the concurrence of the House of Representatives is requested. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Colleagues, I solicit your personal prayers, and let us SENATE MESSAGE remember the families of Representative Mike O'Brien and Representative Sid Kavulich not only today but in the weeks to HOUSE BILLS come. CONCURRED IN BY SENATE Let us pray. Father, our God, we cry out in our times of need, for hope in The clerk of the Senate, being introduced, returned HB 927, times of despair, for faith in times of doubt, for comfort in times PN 1080; HB 1539, PN 3353; HB 2049, PN 3127; and HB 2453, of grief, for grace in times of sin, and for love in times of PN 3590, with information that the Senate has passed the same loneliness. Answer our cry. Be our refuge and our help. Restore without amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Legislative
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2011 SESSION OF 2011 195TH OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY No. 1 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES proclaimed in word and action when we were baptized.) Each of The House convened at 12 m., e.s.t. us is now a part of his resurrection body, refreshed and sustained at one fountain – his Spirit – where we all come to drink. The old labels we once used to identify ourselves – labels THE CHIEF CLERK like Jew or Greek, slave or free" – I know it does not really say (ANTHONY FRANK BARBUSH) PRESIDING this; Democrat or Republican – "are no longer useful. We need something larger, more comprehensive. CALL TO ORDER "I want you to think about how all this makes you more significant, not less. A body isn't just a single part blown up into The CHIEF CLERK. This being the day and hour appointed something huge. It's all the different-but-similar parts arranged by Article II, section 4, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania for and functioning together. If Foot said, 'I'm not elegant like the meeting of the General Assembly, the House of Hand, embellished with rings; I guess I don't belong to this Representatives will now come to order. body,' would that make it so? If Ear said, 'I'm not beautiful like The Sergeants at Arms will close the doors of the House. Eye, limpid and expressive; I don't deserve a place on the head,' The prayer will be offered by the Reverend James Pond, would you want to remove it from the body? If the body was all pastor, First United Methodist Church, Punxsutawney, eye, how could it hear? If all ear, how could it smell? As it is, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Center on Regional Politics Bulletin | Volume 4, Number 1 | Spring 2015
    Center On Regional Politics Bulletin Volume 4, Number 1 | Spring 2015 MAY 6 SYMPOSIUM IN HARRISBURG WILL A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR FOCUS ON LIFTING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT TO GROW PENNSYLVANIA’S ECONOMY Here is the key question in the Pennsylvania Capitol this spring: Can our divided government fix broken school In cooperation with faculty leaders across Pennsylvania uni- funding, attack huge pension liabilities, and relieve oppressive versities, Temple’s Center on Regional Politics (CORP) will property taxes while also eliminating a structural general host a symposium on Wednesday, May 6, for state legislators, fund deficit? And can they achieve these goals in ways that policy makers, and advocates with the theme: “Beyond a also promote economic growth? New School Funding Formula: Lifting Student Achievement to Grow Pennsylvania’s Economy.” Our third school funding symposium May 6 in Harrisburg features a RAND study that estimates the cost to our econ- The event, to be held in the auditorium of Harrisburg Uni- omy of underperforming schools. Temple commissioned versity, 326 Market Street, just a block from the Main Capi- the study with business support to encourage the General tol Complex, will feature RAND Corporation’s study of the Assembly, policymakers, school officials, and teachers to aim economic payoff to Pennsylvania from raising student test for ambitious, long run student performance gains while scores and high school graduation rates, and an internation- they are addressing the immediate shortfalls and inequities ally recognized expert’s look at how other countries helped in school funding. Also featured is a presentation on how their students move to the top of world rankings while the the world’s best education systems got to the top and grew US hovered just above or below the average for developed their economies.
    [Show full text]