DOCSLIB.ORG

British Local Authorities and How Much Council Tax They Hold in Dormant/Closed Accounts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
British Local Authorities and How Much Council Tax They Hold in Dormant/Closed Accounts British local authorities and how much council tax they hold in dormant/closed accounts Amount of credit in Name of local authority closed/dormant Number of closed/dormant accounts accounts in credit Aberdeen City Council £611,837 3,510 Aberdeenshire Council N/A* N/A* Adur District Council £23,988 103 Allerdale Borough Council £91,857 1,386 Amber Valley Borough Council £538,953 5,831 Angus Council £252,600 2,176 Argyll & Bute Council N/A N/A Arun District Council £232,609 1,817 Ashfield District Council N/A N/A Ashford Borough Council £224,143 1,783 Aylesbury Vale District Council £446,445 2,222 Babergh District Council £69,043 417 Barnsley Borough Council £126,722 967 Barrow Borough Council £517,500 4,520 Basildon District Council N/A N/A Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council £232,736 1,513 Bassetlaw District Council N/A N/A Bath & North East Somerset Council £1,250,000 9,714 Bedford Borough Council N/A N/A Birmingham City Council £6,684,216 39,274 Blaby District Council N/A N/A Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £466,939 4,680 Blackpool Council £104,253 545 Blaenau Gwent County Borough £418,978 10,888 Bolsover District Council £173,679 1,309 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £293,576 1,546 Borough Council of Wellingborough N/A N/A Boston Borough Council £394,529 4,462 Bournemouth Borough Council £191,943 3,045 Bracknell Forest Council £43,398 577 Braintree District Council N/A N/A Breckland District Council £39,124 311 Brentwood Borough Council N/A N/A Bridgend County Borough Council £625,133 8,417 Brighton & Hove City Council £1,004,563 6,830 Bristol City Council N/A N/A Broadland District Council £75,502 484 Bromsgrove District Council £320,449 2,057 Broxbourne Council £161,677 978 Broxtowe Borough Council N/A N/A Burnley Borough Council £239,159 1,928 Bury Council £919,422 11,363 Caerphilly County Borough Council £408,000 4,946 Calderdale Council £795,307 8,458 Cambridge City Council £3,140,000 1,983 Cannock Chase District Council £238,697 2,399 Canterbury City Council £873,128 6,516 Cardiff Council £599,628 6,670 Carlisle City Council N/A N/A Carmarthenshire County Council N/A N/A Castle Point Borough Council £180,652 1,463 Central Bedfordshire Council £550,732 4,909 Ceredigion County Council N/A N/A Charnwood Borough Council £435 82 Chelmsford City Council N/A N/A Cheltenham Borough Council £41,407 338 Cherwell District Council £837,102 3,510 Cheshire East Council £2,419,640 12,558 Cheshire West & Chester Council £551,718 4,293 Chesterfield Borough Council £296,509 3,035 Chichester District Council £802,342 3,323 Chiltern District Council £179,591 571 Chorley Council £403,739 3,710 Christchurch Borough Council £44,950 450 City & County of Swansea £91,364 1,105 City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council £356,766 2,107 City of Edinburgh Council £13,201,363 119,061 City of Lincoln Council £759,088 9,670 City of London Corporation £73,623 392 City of Westminster N/A N/A City of Wolverhampton Council £360,138 2,367 City of York £761,824 7,824 Clackmannanshire Council £0 0 Colchester Borough Council £1,020,722 9,583 Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) £15,917 206 Conwy County Borough Council £3,335 18 Copeland Borough Council £62,773 719 Corby Borough Council £206,714 2,486 Cornwall Council £1,696,183 15,887 Cotswold District Council £294,550 1,340 Council of the Isles of Scilly N/A N/A Coventry City Council £882,515 6,213 Craven District Council N/A N/A Crawley Borough Council £240,817 1,917 Dacorum Borough Council £154,076 1,152 Darlington Borough Council £343,178 2,297 Dartford Borough Council N/A N/A Daventry District Council £148,461 1,053 Denbighshire Council £183,606 1,612 Derby City Council £202,075 2,933 Derbyshire Dales £58,809 372 Doncaster Council £463,163 4,701 Dover District Council £615,290 5,198 Dudley Metropolitan Borough £356,000 3,482 Dumfries & Galloway Council N/A N/A Dundee City Council £54,914 366 Durham County Council £99,314 625 Ealing Council £5,929,560 29,812 East Ayrshire Council £32,840 276 East Cambridgeshire District Council £355,731 2,165 East Devon District Council £144,579 965 East Dorset District Council £148,433 941 East Dunbartonshire Council £115,290 1,080 East Hampshire District Council £82,255 355 East Herts Council £112,766 540 East Lindsey District Council £73,083 524 East Lothian Council £584,570 7,580 East Northamptonshire Council £48,774 332 East Renfrewshire Council £156,457 1,490 East Riding of Yorkshire Council £427,704 3,299 East Staffordshire Borough Council £644,064 9,296 Eastbourne Borough Council £329,930 1,564 Eastleigh Borough Council £253,144 1,569 Eden District Council N/A N/A Elmbridge Borough Council £496,590 1,617 Epping Forest District Council £661,119 3,665 Epsom & Ewell Borough Council £151,213 406 Erewash Borough £110,273 1,429 Exeter City £209,137 1,873 Falkirk District Council £345,071 4,862 Fareham Borough Council N/A N/A Fenland District Council £539,373 4,462 Fife Council N/A N/A Flintshire County Council N/A N/A Folkestone & Hythe £69,012 430 Forest Heath District Council £239,953 1,472 Forest of Dean District Council £87,896 599 Fylde Borough Council £42,980 150 Gateshead Council £489,713 5,659 Gedling Borough Council £61,858 483 Glasgow City Council £12,790,250 65,636 Gloucester City Council £634,432 5,449 Gosport Borough Council N/A N/A Gravesham Borough Council £476,661 4,690 Great Yarmouth Borough Council N/A N/A Guildford Borough Council £971,856 11,304 Gwynedd Council N/A N/A Halton Borough Council £211,826 2,951 Hambleton N/A N/A Harborough District Council N/A N/A Haringey Council £5,261,025 24,704 Harlow Council £222,895 2,038 Harrogate Borough Council N/A N/A Harrow Council £756,659 2,249 Hart District Council N/A N/A Hartlepool Borough Council £163,836 2,036 Hastings Borough Council £726,394 6,042 Havant District Council £867,427 6,809 Herefordshire Council £350,890 3,068 Hertsmere Borough Council £694,998 4,840 High Peak Borough N/A N/A Highland Council N/A N/A Hinckley & Bosworth District Council N/A N/A Horsham District Council N/A N/A Hull City Council £453,020 7,285 Huntingdonshire District Council £39,964 174 Hyndburn Borough Council £0 0 Inverclyde Council £74,466 601 Ipswich Borough Council £220,377 1,561 Isle of Anglesey County Council £135,483 467 Isle of Wight Council £599,497 4,111 Kettering Borough Council £31,476 233 King's Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council £40,544 163 Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council N/A N/A Knowsley Metropolitan Borough N/A N/A Lancaster City Council £2,920,055 2,302 Leeds City Council £1,508,883 12,868 Leicester City Council N/A N/A Lewes District Council £329,930 1,564 Lichfield District Council £600,848 5,168 Liverpool City Council £396,000 3,411 London Borough of Barking & Dagenham £1,658,141 14,728 London Borough of Barnet £485,720 2,763 London Borough of Bexley £2,677,101 19,939 London Borough of Brent N/A N/A London Borough of Bromley £3,600,778 24,622 London Borough of Camden £4,602,791 22,382 London Borough of Croydon N/A N/A London Borough of Enfield N/A N/A London Borough of Hackney £5,536,132* 65,606 London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham £3,600,000 27,492 London Borough of Havering N/A N/A London Borough of Hillingdon £1,366,167 8,987 London Borough of Hounslow £6,004,317 55,626 London Borough of Islington N/A N/A London Borough of Lambeth £4,817,571 24,253 London Borough of Lewisham N/A N/A London Borough of Newham N/A N/A London Borough of Redbridge £3,411,538 24,302 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames £4,113,418 27,791 London Borough of Southwark £4,818,712 27,267 London Borough of Sutton £704,279 3,430 London Borough of Tower Hamlets £6,547,419 66,072 London Borough of Waltham Forest £2,715,955 19,227 London Borough of Wandsworth N/A N/A Luton Borough Council £642,352 5,526 Maidstone Borough Council £284,034 2,114 Maldon District Council N/A N/A Malvern Hills District Council £80,479 386 Manchester City Council £4,887,574 54,393 Mansfield District Council £418,372 1,457 Medway Council £1,130,792 380 Melton Borough Council £5,379 123 Mendip District Council £1,008,391 9,963 Merthyr Tydfil Council £105,651 1,075 Merton Council £2,263,239 14,349 Mid Devon District Council £77,714 486 Mid Suffolk District Council £74,288 419 Mid Sussex District Council £1,250,096 6,250 Middlesbrough Borough Council £1,176,215 12,276 Midlothian Council £1,130,402 12,048 Milton Keynes Council N/A N/A Mole Valley Council £235,863 1,185 Monmouthshire County Council £61,545 255 Moray Council £385,441 4,750 Neath Port Talbot Council £8,302 47 New Forest District Council £57,360 269 Newark & Sherwood District Council N/A N/A Newcastle upon Tyne City Council N/A N/A Newcastle-under-Lyme Council N/A N/A Newport City Council £210,186 2,373 North Ayrshire Council £237,861 3,474 North Devon District Council N/A N/A North Dorset District Council £143,171 1,001 North East Derbyshire £361,832 2,978 North East Lincolnshire Council £832,243 7,944 North Hertfordshire District Council £1,444,137 7,077 North Kesteven District Council £267,982 2,147 North Lanarkshire Council £953,795 11,373 North Lincolnshire Council £75,807 1,163 North Norfolk District Council £65,634 398 North Somerset Council N/A N/A North Tyneside Council £354,142 3,339 North Warwickshire Borough Council £16,826 99 North West Leicestershire N/A N/A Northampton Borough Council £1,337,725 11,463 Northumberland County Council £78,767 591 Norwich City Council £293,693 2,921 Nottingham City Council N/A N/A Nuneaton & Bedworth N/A N/A Oadby & Wigston District Council £159,994 1,825 Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council N/A N/A Orkney
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Verification Requirements for Cover Systems YALPAG Technical Guidance for Developers, Landowners and Consultants Page | 1 Overview Flowchart
    VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR COVER SYSTEMS Technical Guidance for Developers, Landowners and Consultants Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Pollution Advisory Group Version 4.1 – June 2021 The purpose of this guidance is to promote consistency and good practice for development on land affected by contamination. The Local Authorities in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, the North East of England, East Anglia, Greater Manchester and St Helens who have adopted this guidance are shown below: Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 The Process of Verification .................................................................................................... 1 Overview Flowchart ................................................................................................................ 2 Key Points ............................................................................................................................... 3 KP1: Source of Material ...................................................................................................... 3 KP2: Characterisation of Material ...................................................................................... 3 KP3: Suitability of Material ................................................................................................. 5 KP5: Verification of Required Depth .................................................................................. 6 KP6: Reporting ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Datagm Type: Website Organisation(S): GM Local Authorities, Open Data Manchester, GMFRS Tags: Open Data, Process, Standards, Website
    Case Study: DataGM Type: Website Organisation(s): GM local authorities, Open Data Manchester, GMFRS Tags: open data, process, standards, website This was the earliest attempt in Greater Manchester to create a simple datastore that would hold important data from across the region, focussing on government transparency and providing better public services. The result was a highly functional datastore with which brought together data from a wider range of data publishers, and included a total of 371 datasets. It was ultimately not successful in creating a lasting basis for open data cooperation and access in Greater Manchester. However, it provides interesting lessons on how to proceed with future projects. Background DataGM was launched in February 2011, inspired by successful projects in North American cities, such as Track DC (now Open Data DC) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore City Stats (now Open Baltimore). It was conceived as a one-stop-shop for key datasets on all aspects of city life. The programme emerged through a partnership between Trafford Council and the digital culture agency Future Everything. This began in 2009 when the Manchester Innovation Fund supported Future Everything to build open data innovation architecture in Greater Manchester, funded by NESTA, Manchester Council and the North West Regional Development Agency (now closed). Future Everything and Trafford Council in turn partnered with a wide range of data publishing organisations. These included local authority partners, as well as Greater Manchester Policy, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive (now Transport for Greater Manchester), and the North West Strategic Health Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK COUNTRY EXECUTIVE JOINT COMMITTEE Access to Information Procedure Rules – General Exception Key Decisions Notified After Publication Deadline
    BLACK COUNTRY EXECUTIVE JOINT COMMITTEE Access to Information procedure rules – General Exception Key Decisions notified after publication deadline Project Name Key Decision to be considered (to provide adequate details for Contact Officer Date Item to Chair of relevant Overview and Scrutiny those both in and outside of the Council) be Committee informed considered Growth Hub - Grant Funding Approval for the Accountable Body for the Black Simon Neilson 24/06/20 Dudley Council Agreement Approval 2020/21 Country Growth Hub (Walsall Council) to [email protected] - Cllr Ray Burston – 11/06/20 proceed to a Grant Agreement, with the Black Country Consortium Ltd, to deliver the Black Sandwell Council Country Growth Hub Funding for 2020/21. - Cllr Laura Rollins – 15/06/20 Walsall Council - Cllr John Murray – 15/06/20 City of Wolverhampton Council - Cllr Paul Sweet – 10/06/20 Hub to Home Transport Approval for the Accountable Body for the Alan Lunt 25/09/19 Dudley Council Innovation Centre and Test Local Growth Deal programme (Walsall [email protected] - Cllr Nicola Richards – 28-8-19 Track Project: Very Light Rail Council) to proceed to enter into a Grant and Autonomous Agreement and/or other appropriate Stuart Everton Sandwell Council Technologies – Test Track documentation, with Dudley Council to [email protected] - Cllr Laura Rollins – 29-8-19 Project Grant Agreement deliver the Local Growth Deal funded elements ov.uk of the Very Light Rail Test Track Project. Walsall Council - Cllr Louise Harrison – 29-8-19 Notes that there is work currently ongoing with Dudley Council, the BC LEP and the City of Wolverhampton Council Accountable Body, to validate the available - Cllr Paul Sweet – 3-9-19 funds in the Black Country Enterprise Zone, to fund the next phases of the project which will include the Innovation Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Plan Southport Town Deal
    Community Engagement Plan Southport Town Deal June 2020 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Town Deals 2 3. Engagement Plan and Programme 5 4. Next steps 11 Appendix 1: Towns Fund Prospectus 1 1. Introduction 1.1 This Community Engagement Plan has been produced to support the emerging Southport Town Investment Plan. Its purpose is to outline the key engagement activities that have been undertaken to date with stakeholders, including elected members and representatives of the local community, and to detail the planned engagement and consultation prior to finalisation of the Southport Town Investment Plan. 1.2 This document is structured to provide: • An introduction to Town Deals and Town Investment Plans • Details of the engagement activities carried out to date and the proposed Engagement Plan and Programme • The proposed next steps 1.3 This Community Engagement Plan has been informed by information set out in the ‘Towns Fund Prospectus’ published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) in November 2019. The Prospectus is included as Appendix 1 to this document. 1.4 The Community Engagement Plan has been produced by Turley on behalf of Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC). It will be published by SMBC to ensure transparency over the engagement process to inform preparation of the Southport Town Investment Plan. 1 2. Town Deals 2.1 In November 2019 the Local Government Secretary invited 101 towns, including Southport, to develop proposals for a Town Deal with the Government, each one potentially receiving up to £25 million investment from the national £3.6 billion Towns Fund. 2.2 While Government has entered into a number of ‘City Deals’ to stimulate growth in large urban areas, smaller towns have been overlooked by that process and not always benefitted from economic growth even where located in close proximity to more prosperous areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Its Integrated Coastal Zone Management The
    Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vol. 1 475 The ‘Sefton Coast Partnership’: an overview of its integrated coastal zone management A. T. Worsley1, G. Lymbery2, C. A. Booth3, P. Wisse2 & V. J. C. Holden1 1Natural, Geographical and Applied Sciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, U.K. 2Coastal Defence Unit, Ainsdale Discovery Centre Complex, Southport, Merseyside, U.K. 3Environmental and Analytical Sciences Division, Research Institute in Advanced Technologies (RIATec), The University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, U.K. Abstract The Sefton Coast Partnership (SCP), based in Sefton, Merseyside, UK, is set within the context of and reported as an example of Integrated Coastal Zone Management. It has developed out of a well-established and successful Management Scheme and, since its inception, attempted with varying success to develop a ‘working partnership’ which has sustainable management at its heart and which is responsible for conservation and the needs of the local community. The history, function and structure of the SCP are described together with the problems that emerged as the partnership developed. Keywords: ICZM, partnership, sustainable management, Sefton. 1 Introduction The coastal zone is hugely significant in terms of sustainable management since this is where human activities affect and are inseparable from marine and terrestrial processes and environments both in developed countries and the Third World. Integrated management therefore requires a holistic, geographic approach and, in order to be successful, action at the local and regional level which is supported by the national government. This paper introduces the Sefton Coast Partnership as an example of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 84, © 2005 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) 476 Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt-Newcastle.Pdf
    North Tyneside Council Cobalt 14, Quicksilver Way, North Tyneside NE27 0QQ Modern Government Let Office Investment Long Unexpired Lease Term with Annual Rent Reviews • Located on Cobalt Business Park, in Newcastle, with easy access to the A1 dual carriageway via the A19 dual carriageway. • Built in February 2007, the property comprises a modern, well specified office building totalling approximately 46,136 sq ft (4,286 sq m). • The property is offered on a long leasehold basis with an unexpired term of 108 years at an annual peppercorn rent. • Entirely let to North Tyneside Council on a 23 year term from 1st July 2009 (with currently around 19 years unexpired) . • The property is let on a Lease Plus Agreement with a total current income of £878,981 per annum. • Under the Lease Plus Agreement the total initial rent payable is apportioned 68% to the base occupational rental income and 32% for the Facilities Management Service provision. • The 68% base Occupational Income is subject to fixed annual increases of 2.6% per annum and currently amounts to £586,914 per annum (£12.72 per sq ft). The 32% FM element is subject to annual increases in line with the movement in RPIx. • In addition to the Income received from North Tyneside Council, the landlord also benefits from a Rental Top Up which is held in an escrow account. The total value of the cash pot amounts to approximately £790,000 and is released on a monthly basis. For 2013 the annual top up amounts to £150,869. • By virtue of a renegotiated FM Service contract, the landlord also y benefits from a saving by virtue of receiving a higher annual FM r payment from North Tyneside Council when compared with the actual cost of the FM service provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Users (Clients)
    TC622 – NORTH WEST CONSTRUCTION HUB MEDIUM VALUE FRAMEWORK (2019 to 2023) Framework Users (Clients) Prospective Framework users are as follows: Local Authorities - Cheshire - Cheshire East Council - Cheshire West and Chester Council - Halton Borough Council - Warrington Borough Council; Cumbria - Allerdale Borough Council - Copeland Borough Council - Barrow in Furness Borough Council - Carlisle City Council - Cumbria County Council - Eden District Council - South Lakeland District Council; Greater Manchester - Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council - Bury Metropolitan Borough Council - Manchester City Council – Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council - Salford City Council – Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council - Trafford Metropolitan Borough - Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Lancashire - Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council – Blackpool Borough Council - Burnley Borough Council - Chorley Borough Council - Fylde Borough Council – Hyndburn Borough Council - Lancashire County Council - Lancaster City Council - Pendle Borough Council – Preston City Council - Ribble Valley Borough Council - Rossendale Borough Council - South Ribble Borough Council - West Lancashire Borough Council - Wyre Borough Council; Merseyside - Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council - Liverpool City Council - Sefton Council - St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council - Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council; Police Authorities - Cumbria Police Authority - Lancashire Police Authority - Merseyside
    [Show full text]
  • Executive's Revenue Budget Proposals 2021/22 and Medium Term Financial Strategy
    TRAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Report to: Executive and Council Date: 17 February 2021 Report for: Decision Report of: Executive Member for Finance and Governance and the Director of Finance and Systems Report Title Executive’s Revenue Budget Proposals 2021/22 & MTFS 2022/23 - 2023/24 Summary This report sets out the Executive’s updated 3 year budget strategy proposals and detailed revenue budget proposals for 2021/22 and Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) for the period 2022/23 - 2023/24. The key summary of figures for the revenue budget are: The overall budget movement for 2021/22 is an increase in the net budget of £3.78m or 2.15%, from £175.52m to £179.30m. The budget funding gap for the three years before applying these proposals is now estimated to be £43.27m comprising : o £35.19m of additional cost pressures o £8.08m of reductions to funding The budget gap for 2021/22 of £25.52m comprises o £17.18m of business as usual pressures o £8.34m of COVID-19 pressures The proposals contained in the report close the 2021/22 budget gap of £25.52m via a mixture of measures: o Use of reserves of £8.34m to address the COVID-19 pressures Business as Usual Pressures will be addressed by: o Additional funding from Council Tax of £5.20m o Use of reserves £2.80m o Income generation and Service delivery savings £9.18m It should be noted that if all the proposals in this report are implemented there currently still remains a residual budget gap of: o £11.12m in 2022/23, and o £10.30m in 2023/24 Throughout 2021 the Executive will continue to review proposals to address this budget gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Accessibility Across UK Local Authorities
    Accessibility across UK Local Authorities Socitm and Sitemorse collaboration – supporting BetterConnected Introduction Digital accessibility regulation is challenging to manage and is negatively impacting those for whom the rules should be assisting. Public sector bodies must deal with accessibility, against a timetable. Now with a specific timeline in relation to the public sector achieving accessibility compliance for their websites, we have summarised our Q3 / 2019 results, reporting the position across the sector. For over 10 years Sitemorse have been in partnership with Socitm, working on numerous initiatives including BetterConnected. Sept. 29th 2019 | Ver. 1.9 | Release | © Sitemorse In Summary. For the Sitemorse 2019 Q3 UK Local Government INDEX we assessed over 400 authority websites for adherence to WCAG 2.1. The INDEX was compiled 37% following some 250 million tests, checks and measures across nearly 820,000 URLs. 17% Comparing the Q3 to the Q2 results; 49 improved, 44 dropped, with the balance remaining the same. Three Local Authorities achieved a score of 10 (out of 10) for accessibility. It’s important to note that the INDEX covers the main website of each authority. The law applies to all websites operated, directly or on behalf of the authority. 46% The target score is 7.7 out of 10. • Pages passing accessibility level A: 87.11% • Pages passing accessibility level AA: 12.2% • Of the 3,550 PDF’s 56.4% PDF’s passed the accessibility tests. Score 10 - 7 Score 5 - 6 Score 1 - 4 It is important to note that this score is for automated tests; there are still manual tests that need to be performed however, a score of 10 demonstrates a thorough understanding of what needs to be done and it is highly likely that the manual tests will pass too.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • North Tyneside Infrastructure Delivery 2017
    North Tyneside Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan August 2017 North Tyneside Infrastructure Delivery 2017 Contents Table of Figures.......................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................4 2 Methodology.................................................................................................................. 11 3 Transport ....................................................................................................................... 12 4 Community Facilities.................................................................................................... 29 5 Utility Services ................................................................................................................... 36 6 Waste Management ......................................................................................................... 39 7 Water/Flooding .................................................................................................................. 44 8 Open Space .................................................................................................................. 49 9 Health ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Tyneside Council
    W C A U E C H M D B 5 y L R L A R E E A N A 0 N D L M IN P R G R 5 M FO O B I U S E R O Y LA N T W 1 R W O E O N A D H E E B H R O H D T U C O T Y D L A B S Seaton W R O L R R CLIF STO T E E R C N TO I E R L O N R R IF T RO B Seaton W AD H S R L O C A A G LI O E FT W L O T M C N N R E H O A D A A 26 O 27 D A S 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 32 33 R D 34 35 36 37 D F E 1 A E O M U NWO L ORWI 7 OD DR W R CK C N IVE Sluice 1 elcome to the new North Tyneside cycling map, and its OAD E IN D V 1 R C R W A M L W E E E MEL EA B A 0 O O A K L I R E S 9 IDG E C TON L S E ID 1 L P C A L A D V A E R S T I E E A F E E I CY TR H N E R S E D S E U L P I A M C R E EL M P surrounding area.
    [Show full text]