Delivering Better Health and Care for Everyone
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Social Prescribing Across West Yorkshire and Harrogate
Mapping Social Prescribing Across West Yorkshire & Harrogate ICS Summary Characteristics of social Harrogate Wakefield Leeds Kirklees Bradford Calderdale prescribing scheme A Commissioned YES YES YES YES YES YES service with a feedback link Living Well can Live Well Social Prescribing service in Social prescribing The Community Staying Well is the from link support adults who Wakefield place across NHS Leeds CCG service in place. Connectors social social prescribing workers to are currently not area. Currently 3 schemes Better IN Kirklees prescribing service model in commissioners eligible for on-going Commissioned by reflecting previous 3 CCG commissioned for Calderdale. It is to identify gaps social care support Public Health areas – the schemes work Care navigators in Bradford CCGs with provided by the in services and and who: closely together sharing best place in primary care some joint funding from local authority unmet need. • are lonely and / or Fund available to practice and ensuring that the Local Authority. and funded by the socially isolated; micro-commission there is ‘no wrong front door Local Areas local authority • had a recent loss of to meet gaps in for Leeds’. Coordinators The provider sends and CFfC. a support provision locally currently being through quarterly network, ; compared to NHS Leeds CCG recruited. monitoring reports There is also work • had a loss of identified need. commissioning a single model which include feedback underway to confidence due to a for the city to start Community Plus about gaps in services develop the recent change September 2019 (when provide community and issues which the thinking on social • require face-to-face current contracts end). -
Verification Requirements for Cover Systems YALPAG Technical Guidance for Developers, Landowners and Consultants Page | 1 Overview Flowchart
VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR COVER SYSTEMS Technical Guidance for Developers, Landowners and Consultants Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Pollution Advisory Group Version 4.1 – June 2021 The purpose of this guidance is to promote consistency and good practice for development on land affected by contamination. The Local Authorities in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, the North East of England, East Anglia, Greater Manchester and St Helens who have adopted this guidance are shown below: Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 The Process of Verification .................................................................................................... 1 Overview Flowchart ................................................................................................................ 2 Key Points ............................................................................................................................... 3 KP1: Source of Material ...................................................................................................... 3 KP2: Characterisation of Material ...................................................................................... 3 KP3: Suitability of Material ................................................................................................. 5 KP5: Verification of Required Depth .................................................................................. 6 KP6: Reporting ................................................................................................................... -
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More Or Allocation System Year from to Less?) Source References
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More or Allocation System Year From To Less?) Source References (1) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila and Tayfun Sonmez. 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach." American Economic Review , 101(1): 399‐410. (2) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin Roth and Tayfun Sonmez. 2005. "The Boston Public Schools Match." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96: 368‐371. (3) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sonmez. 2006. "Changing the Boston Mechanism: Strategy‐proofness as Equal Access." NBER Working Paper 11965. (4) Cook, Gareth. 2003. "School Assignment Flaws Detailed: Two economists study problem, offer relief." Boston Boston Public Schools (K, 6, 9) 2005 Boston GS Less A,B,E Globe, September 12. (5) BPS. 2002‐2010. "Introducing the Boston Public Schools." (1) Rossi, Rosalind. 2009. "8th Graders' Shot at Elite High Schools Better." Chicago Sun‐Times, November 12. (2) CPS, 2009. "Post Consent Decree Assignment Plan." Office of Academic Enhancement, November 11. (3) Chicago Public Schools. 2009. "New Admissions Process: Frequently Asked Questions." (describes the advice 4 4 Chicago Selective High Schools 2009 Boston SD Less A,B,C for re‐ranking schools). (1) CPS. 2010. "Guidelines for Magnet and Selective Enrollment Admissions for the 2011‐2012 School Year." November 29. (2) Joseph, Abigayil and Katie Ellis, 2010. "Refinements to 2011‐2012 Selective Enrollment and Magnet School Admission Policy." November 4. (3) CPS, 2011. "Application to Selective Enrollment High 4 6 2010 SD SD Less A,B,C Schools." Available at www.cpsoae.org, Last accessed December 28, 2011. (1) Ajayi, Kehinde. -
Kirklees Joint Agency Protocol for Domestic Violence and Abuse - School Notifications
Kirklees Joint Agency Protocol for Domestic Violence and Abuse - School Notifications Front Door Safeguarding Hub – Protocol for a Domestic Violence and abuse notification for schools. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Aims and proposed process 3. Legal Requirements 4. Responsibilities 5. Schools` Responsibilities 6. Cross Border considerations Appendices Appendix 1 Early notification for Schools Process Map Appendix 2 Officer Training: Preparing for the notification checklist Appendix 3 Domestic Violence Designated Officer Leadership Responsibilities Appendix 4 Silent and Overt Approaches Appendix 5 Letter to Parents Appendix 6 School Template Appendix 7 Signatories to the Join Agency Domestic Violence School Notification Appendix 1 - Early notification process for schools for DV incidents This process intends to provide early information to schools where their pupils have been present/ witnessed an incident of Domestic violence, where police attended. It does not replace existing child protection/ safeguarding arrangements. Schools will still receive safeguarding notifications through existing routes and arrangements Police Officer attends domestic violence incident. Details of all children who reside at the address, D.O.B obtained Was the child present/ witness at the incident? Details Recorded on incident log/ DASH assessment. Police provide daily download to Front Door Duty & Advice of incidents Front Door Duty & Advice Information checks/ Educational setting identified Education staff telephone contact made with Designated Officer (Safeguarding Lead) at relevant school within 24 hours Mon-Fri. Weekend by Monday. Excel/SharePoint record maintained by Front Door Duty & Advice. Detailing incident number, school, safeguarding lead to who disseminated and date. Designated safeguarding officer to record information received in school Child protection file School to determine/ deliver appropriate level of support Link with Safer Schools Officer, where available/ appropriate. -
Introduction Accessibility Across UK Local Authorities
Accessibility across UK Local Authorities Socitm and Sitemorse collaboration – supporting BetterConnected Introduction Digital accessibility regulation is challenging to manage and is negatively impacting those for whom the rules should be assisting. Public sector bodies must deal with accessibility, against a timetable. Now with a specific timeline in relation to the public sector achieving accessibility compliance for their websites, we have summarised our Q3 / 2019 results, reporting the position across the sector. For over 10 years Sitemorse have been in partnership with Socitm, working on numerous initiatives including BetterConnected. Sept. 29th 2019 | Ver. 1.9 | Release | © Sitemorse In Summary. For the Sitemorse 2019 Q3 UK Local Government INDEX we assessed over 400 authority websites for adherence to WCAG 2.1. The INDEX was compiled 37% following some 250 million tests, checks and measures across nearly 820,000 URLs. 17% Comparing the Q3 to the Q2 results; 49 improved, 44 dropped, with the balance remaining the same. Three Local Authorities achieved a score of 10 (out of 10) for accessibility. It’s important to note that the INDEX covers the main website of each authority. The law applies to all websites operated, directly or on behalf of the authority. 46% The target score is 7.7 out of 10. • Pages passing accessibility level A: 87.11% • Pages passing accessibility level AA: 12.2% • Of the 3,550 PDF’s 56.4% PDF’s passed the accessibility tests. Score 10 - 7 Score 5 - 6 Score 1 - 4 It is important to note that this score is for automated tests; there are still manual tests that need to be performed however, a score of 10 demonstrates a thorough understanding of what needs to be done and it is highly likely that the manual tests will pass too. -
Explanatory Memorandum to the City of Leeds (Mayoral Referendum) Order 2012
GROUPED EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF BRADFORD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF BRISTOL (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF COVENTRY (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF LEEDS (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF LIVERPOOL (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF MANCHESTER (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF NOTTINGHAM (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF WAKEFIELD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 2012 Nos. [XXXX] 1. This grouped explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Communities and Local Government and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the instruments Each of these Orders require the local authority named therein to hold a referendum, on 3 May 2012, on whether it should start to operate a mayor and cabinet executive form of governance (i.e. have a directly elected mayor). 3. Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments None. 4. Legislative Context 4.1 Part 1A (Arrangements with respect to local authority governance in England) and new Schedule A1 (Executive arrangements in England: further provision) of the Local Government Act 2000 (“the 2000 Act”) (as inserted by section 21 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Localism Act 2011 (“the 2011 Act”)), make provision for the governance of local authorities in England. One of the permitted forms of governance, under these provisions, is the mayor and cabinet executive. 4.2 Section 9N of the 2000 Act gives the Secretary of State the power by order to require a specified local authority to hold a referendum on whether the authority should have a directly elected mayor. -
Transforming Care Partnership Plan
Transforming Care Partnership Plan Calderdale, Kirklees, Wakefield and Barnsley 1 What is the Calderdale, Kirklees, Wakefield and Barnsley Transforming Care Partnership? This group has been started to work on making care and services better for people with a learning disability in the Calderdale, Kirklees, Wakefield and Barnsley areas. We are making plans on how to do this work. When the work starts, we will have a board of people that will check and make sure our plans are happening. Who is on the board? Kirklees Council Calderdale Council Wakefield Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Calderdale Clinical Commissioning Group Greater Huddersfield Commissioning Group Transforming Care North Kirklees Clinical Commissioning Group Partnership Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group Barnsley Clinical Commissioning Group Specialist Commissioning Services Learning Disability Partnership Boards. 2 What isWhat the Calderdale, is the Calderdale, Kirklees, Wakefield Kirklees, and BarnsleyWakefield Transforming and Care Barnsley Partnership (CKWB) Plan about? Transforming Care Partnership Plan about? We are working on a plan to change care for people with a learning disability and/or autism in our areas. There are 2 national plans called: Building the Right Support National Service Model October 2015. National plans are plans for the whole of England. We will make our plan fit in with the National plans. Each area in Calderdale, Kirklees, Wakefield and Barnsley will use the plan to work on their own local services. Our Partnership will check how the areas are doing. It will help to share good information across the areas to make sure we are all working in the best way. 3 Who is the plan for? The plan is for everyone in the community but we want to make sure it is good for people who: Have a mental health illness. -
Service Bradford Calderdale Kirklees Greater Huddersfield CCG Area
Kirklees Kirklees Service Bradford Calderdale Greater Huddersfield CCG Area North Kirklees CCG Area Leeds Wakefield (HD postcode) (non HD postcode) Month Claims Submissions Jon Hainsworth Contracting Team NHS England West Yorkshire Area Team Calderdale CCG Ground Floor Service not commissioned in this Service not commissioned in this Care Homes 5th Floor, F Mill Service not commissioned in this area. 3 City Office Park Service not commissioned in this area. area. area. Dean Cough Meadow Lane Halifax Leeds HX3 5AX LS11 5BD Service not commissioned in this Commissioned as part of the Sexual Health (EHC) Chlamydia Via CLASP Via CLASP/Locala Via CLASP/Locala TBC area. Service Service not commissioned in this Service not commissioned in Service not commissioned in this Flu Vaccination Service not commissioned in this area. Service not commissioned in this area. Service not commissioned in this area. area. this area. area. Month Claims Submissions Health Informatics Department Health Informatics Department Contracting Team Broad Lea House Broad Lea House Calderdale CCG Service not commissioned in this Bradley Park Bradley Park Head Lice 5th Floor, F Mill Service not commissioned in this area. Service not commissioned in this area. area. Dyson Wood Way Dyson Wood Way Dean Cough Huddersfield Huddersfield Halifax HD2 1GZ HD2 1GZ HX3 5AX Andrew Harter Adult Social Care Commissioning 2nd Floor East Service not commissioned in Service not commissioned in this MAR Chart Scheme TBC Service not commissioned in this area. Merrion House Service not commissioned in this area. this area. area. 110 Merrion Centre Leeds LS2 8QB Month Claims Submissions Jon Hainsworth Health Informatics Department Health Informatics Department Contracting Team NHS England West Yorkshire Area Team Broad Lea House Broad Lea House Calderdale CCG Ground Floor Service not commissioned in this Bradley Park Bradley Park Minor Ailments 5th Floor, F Mill 3 City Office Park Service not commissioned in this area. -
The Tort Liability of American Municipalities*
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky Kentucky Law Journal Volume 40 | Issue 2 Article 1 1951 The orT t Liability of American Municipalities Chester James Antieau Washburn University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Antieau, Chester James (1951) "The orT t Liability of American Municipalities," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 40 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol40/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TORT LIABILITY OF AMERICAN MUNICIPALITIES* By CHESTER JAMES ANTIEAUT * For torts committed in the performance of activities ultra vires the municipal corporation, the city is customarily immune from liability.1 The great majority of courts further deny municipal liability when negligent torts are committed beyond the author ized powers of particular agents, but infra vires the municipal corporation,2 although there are well-reasoned cases contra. 3 Al- though cities are occasionally held responsible for the wilful torts of employees, 4 the majority rule is contrary - Municipalities have by adoption or ratification been held liable for torts of agents un- authorized but within the power of the municipal corporation.6 Municipalities are regularly not liable for torts when the actor is an independent contractor. -
Street Lighting As an Asset; Smart Cities and Infrastructure Developments ADEPTE ASSOCIATION of DIRECTORS of ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING and TRANSPORT
ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT DAVE JOHNSON ADEPT Street Lighting Group chair ADEPT Engineering Board member UKLB member TfL Contracts Development Manager ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT • Financial impact of converting to LED • Use of Central Management Systems to profile lighting levels • Street Lighting as an Asset; Smart Cities and Infrastructure Developments ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY, PLANNING AND TRANSPORT Representing directors from county, unitary and metropolitan authorities, & Local Enterprise Partnerships. Maximising sustainable community growth across the UK. Delivering projects to unlock economic success and create resilient communities, economies and infrastructure. http://www.adeptnet.org.uk ADEPTE SOCIETY OF CHIEF OFFICERS OF CSS Wales TRANSPORTATION IN SCOTLAND ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT ADEPTE SOCIETY OF CHIEF OFFICERS OF CSS Wales TRANSPORTATION IN SCOTLAND ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT Bedford Borough Council Gloucestershire County Council Peterborough City Council Blackburn with Darwen Council Hampshire County Council Plymouth County Council Bournemouth Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Portsmouth City Council Bristol City Council Hull City Council Solihull MBC Buckinghamshire County Council Kent County Council Somerset County -
A Report Into the Impact of Multi-Agency Work Supporting Roma Children in Education
A report into the impact of multi-agency work supporting Roma children in education Dr John Lever www.jblresearch.org December 2012 1 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 Migration from Central and Eastern Europe 4 1.2 UK legislation 4 1.3 Multi-agency partnership work 5 1.4 Research Aims 6 1.5 Research design and methodology 6 1.6 Research limitations 7 2. Culture and engagement 2.1 Reluctance to engage 7 2.2 Cultural tensions migrate west 7 2.3 Established residents and new communities 8 2.4 Barriers to school access 9 3. Strategic and political leadership 3.1 Manchester 10 3.2 Calderdale 11 3.3 Bradford 12 3.4 Redbridge 12 4. Multi-agency work at the local level 4.1 Manchester 13 4.2 Calderdale 17 4.3 Bradford 18 4.4 Redbridge 19 5. Organisational and political change 21 5.1 Schools as independent business units and multi agency hubs 22 5.2 Knowledge and national traveller networks 23 5.3 New ways of working 24 6. Conclusions 25 Recommendations 27 Appendix 27 2 Executive summary Roma migration from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has increased significantly over the last decade as a result of EU expansion. There are now sizable Roma communities in many parts of England – including London, the Midlands and Northern England. Roma are one of the most persecuted groups in history and they can be extremely suspicious of the intentions and actions of non-Roma. Self-help is thus a key feature of Roma culture and many Roma migrants are extremely reluctant to engage with support agencies when they arrive in England. -
Carbon Footprint of Housing in the Leeds City Region – a Best Practice Scenario Analysis
Future Sustainability Programme - Policy Paper Carbon Footprint of Housing in the Leeds City Region – A Best Practice Scenario Analysis John Barrett and Elena Dawkins 2008 Carbon Footprint of Housing in the Leeds City Region – A Best Practice Scenario Analysis John Barrett and Elena Dawkins Commissioned by the Environment Agency Stockholm Environment Institute Kräftriket 2B 106 91 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 674 7070 Fax: +46 8 674 7020 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.sei.se Publications Manager: Erik Willis Web Manager: Howard Cambridge Layout: Richard Clay Cover Photo: Winter sunrise, Otley Road Leeds ©RClay Copyright © 2008 by the Stockholm Environment Institute This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educa- tional or non-profit purposes, without special permission from the copyright holder(s) provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose, without the written permission of the copyright holder(s). ii CONTENTS Executive Summary iv Introduction 1 Scope of this report 2 Policy Targets for GHG Reduction 3 Profile of Leeds City Region 4 Results from Other Studies 6 Using Reap For an Environmental Assessment of the Leeds City Region RSS Housing Policy 6 Regional Strategies and Climate Change – Evaluating the Contribution that Key Regional Strategies Make Towards Addressing Climate Change 6 What is a “Continuing Trends Scenario? 7 Continuing Trends Scenario 7 Continuing trends results 8 What would the total CO2e emissions