DOCSLIB.ORG

Typography One Typeface Classification Why Classify?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Typography One typeface classification Why classify? Classification helps us describe and navigate type choices Typeface classification helps to: 1. sort type (scholars, historians, type manufacturers), 2. reference type (educators, students, designers, scholars) Approximately 250,000 digital typefaces are available today— Even with excellent search engines, a common system of description is a big help! classification systems Many systems have been proposed Francis Thibaudeau, 1921 Maximillian Vox, 1952 Vox-ATypI, 1962 Aldo Novarese, 1964 Alexander Lawson, 1966 Blackletter Venetian French Dutch-English Transitional Modern Sans Serif Square Serif Script-Cursive Decorative J. Ben Lieberman, 1967 Marcel Janco, 1978 Ellen Lupton, 2004 The classification system you will learn is a combination of Lawson’s and Lupton’s systems Black Letter Old Style serif Transitional serif Modern Style serif Script Cursive Slab Serif Geometric Sans Grotesque Sans Humanist Sans Display & Decorative basic characteristics + stress + serifs (or lack thereof) + shape stress: where the thinnest parts of a letter fall diagonal stress vertical stress no stress horizontal stress Old Style serif Transitional serif or Slab Serif or or reverse stress (Centaur) Modern Style serif Sans Serif Display & Decorative (Baskerville) (Helvetica) (Edmunds) serif types bracketed serifs unbracketed serifs slab serifs no serif Old Style Serif and Modern Style Serif Slab Serif or Square Serif Sans Serif Transitional Serif (Bodoni) or Egyptian (Helvetica) (Baskerville) (Rockwell/Clarendon) shape Geometric Sans Serif Grotesk Sans Serif Humanist Sans Serif (Futura) (Helvetica) (Gill Sans) Geometric sans are based on basic Grotesk sans look precisely drawn. Humanist sans are based on shapes like circles, triangles, and They have have uniform, human writing. They have rectangles. symetrical curves asymetrical curves, open apetures, and finials that reach away from the letter. problem area: stress direction Remember the clock Look at all the round letters diagonal stress Old Style serif (Caslon) & : vertical stress & : horizonal stress Everything else: diagonal stress vertical stress Transitional serif (Baskerville) problem area: humanist vs. grotesk Grotesk Sans Serif Humanist Sans Serif symetrical curves asymetrical curves (Helvetica) (Gill Sans) Black Letter Black letter was developed from the handwritten manuscripts of 1400’s Germany. + upright calligraphic strokes + looks medieval Old style serif A style popular from the 1460’s–1770’s + diagonal stress in the round strokes + Minimal variation of thick and thin strokes + small, coarse serifs, often with concave bases + small x-height + lowercase ascenders often exceed the capital height Transitional serif A style introduced in the 1780’s by John Baskerville. + vertical stress in rounded strokes + bracketed serifs with flat bases + greater contrast between thick and thin strokes + larger x-height + lowercase ascenders often match the capital height Modern Style serif Introduced in the 1770s by Didot and Bodoni. + vertical stress in rounded strokes + unbracketed hairline serifs + extreme contrast between thick and thin strokes + small x-height Script Designed to mimic hand-written text + looks hand written + joined lowercase letters + variation between thick and thin strokes + no serifs (often replaced by swashes) + a variety of x-heights Cursive Designed to mimic hand-written text + looks hand written + unjoined lowercase letters + variation between thick and thin strokes + no serifs (often replaced by swashes) + a variety of x-heights Display & Decorative Introduced in the 1800s to meet the demands of advertising. + often whimsical or decorated + usually only legible at large sizes + wide variation in stroke weight and quality + both serif and sans serif Slab Serif (Also called Square Serif or Egyptian) Introduced in the early 1800s. + thick serifs with squared-off ends; serifs are nearly as thick as strokes + slab serifs may be bracketed or unbracketed) + minimal variation of thick and thin strokes + large x-height + vertical stress (if any) in rounded strokes Geometric Sans + Sans serif constucted with geometric forms: triangles, circles, squares Grotesque Sans Sans serif with a precise, mechanical appearance + uniform, symetrical curves + little to no variation of thick and thin strokes + May also be spelled “Grotesk” Humanist Sans Sans serif with the shape of human writing + asymetrical curves and open apetures + some variation of thick and thin strokes Classification decision guide sheet: use for practice and worksheets. Typography 1 Professor King Typography 1 Type classification Professor King Type classification characteristics decisions 1: start easy: Does it look like handwriting? If yes, are the letters Does it look like medeival calligraphy, like Goudy Text? connected, like Snell Roundhand? Then it’s Script. Then it’s Blackletter. Does it look decorated? Is it only legible in large sizes, If it looks like writing but the letters do not connect, like like Cottonwood? Then it’s Display & Decorative. Charme, then it’s Cursive. diagonal stress vertical stress no stress horizontal stress Old Style serif Transitional serif or Slab Serif or or reverse stress (Centaur) Modern Style serif Sans Serif Display & Decorative (Baskerville) (Helvetica) (Edmunds) 2: is it a serif face? Look at the stress of the round letters and the serif style. Does it have vertical stress and bracketed serifs, Does it have thick square serifs, like Rockwell or Clarendon? like Baskerville? Then it’s a Transitional Serif. It’s a Slab Serif. (Also known as a Square Serif or Egyptian.) Do the round letters have diagonal stress, like Centaur? Does it have vertical stress and unbracketed serifs, It’s an Old Style Serif. like Bodoni? Then it’s a Modern Style Serif. bracketed serifs unbracketed serifs slab serifs no serif Old Style Serif and Modern Style Serif Slab Serif or Square Serif Sans Serif Transitional Serif (Bodoni) or Egyptian (Helvetica) (Baskerville) (Rockwell/Clarendon) 3: is it a sans serif face? Is it based on circles, squares, and triangles, like Futura? Does it have have asymetrical curves and open apetures, like Then it’s a Geometric Sans Serif. Gill Sans? Then it’s a Humanist Sans Serif. (Some Humanist Sans faces also have variations of thick and thin strokes.) Geometric Sans Serif Grotesk Sans Serif Humanist Sans Serif Does it have uniform, symetrical curves? Does it look (Futura) (Helvetica) (Gill Sans) carefully drawn instead of written, like Helvetica? Then Geometric sans are based on basic Grotesk sans look precisely drawn. Humanist sans are based on it’s a Grotesk Sans Serif. (Also spelled Grotesque.) shapes like circles, triangles, and They have have uniform, human writing. They have rectangles. symetrical curves asymetrical curves, open apetures, and finials that reach away from the letter. rev: 22 Sept. 2012 revised 23 Sep 2014 2 type classification quiz: + 25 typefaces to classify (None from worksheet: all new.) + Classification: 2 points + Explanation: 2 points You must understand the process and explain your thinking to do well. type classification practice fill in the worksheet along with the lecture 1. Goudy Text: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. 1. Goudy Text: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. Black Letter, because it looks like medieval calligraphy 2. Centaur: Big fjords vex quick waltz nymph. 2. Centaur: Big fjords vex quick waltz nymph. Old Style, because it has diagonal stress and bracketed serifs 3. Baskerville: Two driven jocks help fax my big quiz. 3. Baskerville: Two driven jocks help fax my big quiz. Transitional serif, because it has vertical stress and bracketed serifs 4. Didot: Fickle jinx bog dwarves spy math quiz. 4. Didot: Fickle jinx bog dwarves spy math quiz. Modern Style, because it has vertical stress and unbracketed serifs 5. Rockwell: Bawds jog, flick quartz, vex nymph. 5. Rockwell: Bawds jog, flick quartz, vex nymph. Slab Serif, because it has thick square serifs 6. Snell Roundhand: Nymphs blitz quick vex dwarf jog. 6. Snell Roundhand: Nymphs blitz quick vex dwarf jog. Script, because it looks like handwriting with joined lowercase 7. Gill Sans: Vamp fox held quartz duck just by wing. 7. Gill Sans: Vamp fox held quartz duck just by wing. Humanist Sans Serif, because it has asymetrical curves, open apetures, spread finials 8. Classic Grotesque: DJs flock by when MTV ax quiz prog. 8. Classic Grotesque: DJs flock by when MTV ax quiz prog. Grotesque Sans Serif, because it has even, symetrical curves 9. Eagle light: Brick quiz whangs jumpy veldt fox. 9. Eagle light: Brick quiz whangs jumpy veldt fox. Geometric Sans Serif, because it is based on geometric shapes 10. Rosewood: Fickle bog dwarves jinx empathy quiz. 10. Rosewood: Fickle bog dwarves jinx empathy quiz. Display & Decorative, because it is whimsical and ornamented, and only legible at large sizes 11. Helvetica: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. 11. Helvetica: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. Grotesque Sans Serif, because it has even, symetrical curves 12. cottonwood: Big fjords vex quick waltz nymph. 12. cottonwood: Big fjords vex quick waltz nymph. Display & Decorative, because it is whimsical and ornamented, and only legible at large sizes 13. Bell: Two driven jocks help fax my big quiz. 13. Bell: Two driven jocks help fax my big quiz. Transitional serif, because it has vertical stress and bracketed serifs 14. Village: Fickle jinx bog dwarves spy math quiz. 14. Village: Fickle jinx bog dwarves spy math quiz. Old Style, because it has diagonal stress and bracketed serifs 15. Mrs. Eaves: Bawds jog, flick quartz, vex nymph. 15. Mrs. Eaves: Bawds jog, flick quartz, vex nymph. Transitional serif, because it has vertical stress and bracketed serifs Classify typefaces 16–30 on your own. (classification worksheet 2).
Recommended publications
  • Design One Project Three Introduced October 21. Due November 11

    Design One Project Three Introduced October 21. Due November 11

    Design One Project Three Introduced October 21. Due November 11. Typeface Broadside/Poster Broadsides have been an aspect of typography and printing since the earliest types. Printers and Typographers would print a catalogue of their available fonts on one large sheet of paper. The introduction of a new typeface would also warrant the issue of a broadside. Printers and Typographers continue to publish broadsides, posters and periodicals to advertise available faces. The Adobe website that you use for research is a good example of this purpose. Advertising often interprets the type creatively and uses the typeface in various contexts to demonstrate its usefulness. Type designs reflect their time period and the interests and experiences of the type designer. Type may be planned to have a specific “look” and “feel” by the designer or subjective meaning may be attributed to the typeface because of the manner in which it reflects its time, the way it is used, or the evolving fashion of design. For this third project, you will create two posters about a specific typeface. One poster will deal with the typeface alone, cataloguing the face and providing information about the type designer. The second poster will present a visual analogy of the typeface, that combines both type and image, to broaden the viewer’s knowledge of the type. Process 1. Research the history and visual characteristics of a chosen typeface. Choose a typeface from the list provided. -Write a minimum150 word description of the typeface that focuses on two themes: A. The historical background of the typeface and a very brief biography of the typeface designer.
  • Cloud Fonts in Microsoft Office

    Cloud Fonts in Microsoft Office

    APRIL 2019 Guide to Cloud Fonts in Microsoft® Office 365® Cloud fonts are available to Office 365 subscribers on all platforms and devices. Documents that use cloud fonts will render correctly in Office 2019. Embed cloud fonts for use with older versions of Office. Reference article from Microsoft: Cloud fonts in Office DESIGN TO PRESENT Terberg Design, LLC Index MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS A B C D E Legend: Good choice for theme body fonts F G H I J Okay choice for theme body fonts Includes serif typefaces, K L M N O non-lining figures, and those missing italic and/or bold styles P R S T U Present with most older versions of Office, embedding not required V W Symbol fonts Language-specific fonts MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS Abadi NEW ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Abadi Extra Light ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic or bold styles provided. Agency FB MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Agency FB Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic style provided Algerian MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 01234567890 Note: Uppercase only. No other styles provided. Arial MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
  • Bitstream Fonts in May 2005 at Totaling 350 Font Families with a Total of 1357 Font Styles

    Bitstream Fonts in May 2005 at Totaling 350 Font Families with a Total of 1357 Font Styles

    Bitstream Fonts in May 2005 at http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/bitstream totaling 350 font families with a total of 1357 font styles The former Bitstream typeface libraries consisted mainly of forgeries of Linotype fonts and of ITC fonts. See the list below on the pages 24–29 about the old Bitstream Typeface Library of 1992. The 2005 Bitstream typeface library contains the same forgeries of Linotype fonts as formerly and also the same ITC fonts, but it also includes a lot of new mediocre „rubbish fonts“ (e.g. „Alphabet Soup“, „Arkeo“, „Big Limbo“), but also a few new quality fonts (e.g. „Drescher Grotesk“, „Prima Serif“ etc.). On the other hand, a few old fonts (e.g. „Caxton“) were removed. See the list below on pages 1–23. The typeface collection of CorelDraw comprises almost the entire former old Bitstream typeface library (see the list below on pages 24–29) with the following exceptions: 1. A few (ca. 3) forgeries of Linotype fonts are missing in the CorelDraw font collections, e.g. the fonts „Baskerville No. 2“ (= Linotype Baskerville No. 2), „Italian Garamond“ (= Linotype Garamond Simoncini), and „Revival 555“ (= Linotype Horley Old Style). 2. A lot (ca. 11) of ITC fonts are not contained in the CorelDraw font collections, e.g. „ITC Berkeley Oldstyle“, „ITC Century“, „ITC Clearface“, „ITC Isbell“, „ITC Italia“, „ITC Modern No. 216“, „ITC Ronda“, „ITC Serif Gothic“, „ITC Tom’s Roman“, „ITC Zapf Book“, and „ITC Zapf International“. Ulrich Stiehl, Heidelberg 3-May 2005 Aachen – 2 styles Ad Lib™ – 1 styles Aerospace Pi – 1 styles Aldine
  • Afgbaskerville (The Type Face)

    Afgbaskerville (The Type Face)

    gfaBaskerville (the type face) xagfi {the type} {the man} abcdefghijklmn opqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHI JKLMNOPQR STUVWXYZ Having been an early admirer of the beauty of letters, I vertical stress relatively low contrast “became insensibly desirous of contributing to the perfection Baskerville is a transitional type of them. I formed to myself ideas of greater accuracy than had yet appeared, and had endeavoured to produce a set of types according to what I conceived to be their true { old style type modern type proportion. oblique stress vertical stress —John Baskerville, preface to Milton, 1758 relatively low contrast high contrast (Anatomy of a Typeface) ” {looks} use of orthogonal lines use of orthogonal + curvy lines FHTt BDp use of curvy lines use of diagonal lines cOQ vwXZ In order to truely appreciate the quialities of Baskerville, one must understand the The Baskerville type is known for the crisp edges, high contrast and generous process of its creation. Being a printer, John Baskerville paid close attention to the proportions. Baskerville is categorized as a transitional typeface in between classical technology, creating his own intense black ink. He boiled fine linseed oil to a certain typefaces and the high contrast modern faces. density, dissolved rosin, and let it subside for months before using it. He also studied and invested in presses, resulting in the development of high standards for presses altogether. {anatomy} crossbar serif ear head serif ascender counter apex A a x g Q b q O spur x-height descender swash {characteristics} {1}g Q {2} A {3} {4}J {5}C {6}E {7}ea {1} tail on lower case g does not close {2} swash-like tail of Q {4} J well below baseline {3} high crossbar and pointed apex of A {5} top and bottom serifs on C {6} long lower arm of E {7} small counter of italic e compared to italic a {comparison} Bembo Baskerville Bembo Baskerville d The head serif of Baskerville is generally more horizontal than that of Bembo.
  • Type ID and History

    Type ID and History

    History and Identification of Typefaces with your host Ted Ollier Bow and Arrow Press Anatomy of a Typeface: The pieces of letterforms apex cap line serif x line ear bowl x height counter baseline link loop Axgdecender line ascender dot terminal arm stem shoulder crossbar leg decender fkjntail Anatomy of a Typeface: Design decisions Stress: Berkeley vs Century Contrast: Stempel Garamond vs Bauer Bodoni oo dd AAxx Axis: Akzidenz Grotesk, Bembo, Stempel Garmond, Meridien, Stymie Q Q Q Q Q Typeface history: Blackletter Germanic, completely pen-based forms Hamburgerfonts Alte Schwabacher c1990 Monotype Corporation Hamburgerfonts Engraver’s Old English (Textur) 1906 Morris Fuller Benton Hamburgerfonts Fette Fraktur 1850 Johan Christian Bauer Hamburgerfonts San Marco (Rotunda) 1994 Karlgeorg Hoefer, Alexei Chekulayev Typeface history: Humanist Low contrast, left axis, “penned” serifs, slanted “e”, small x-height Hamburgerfonts Berkeley Old Style 1915 Frederic Goudy Hamburgerfonts Centaur 1914 Bruce Rogers after Nicolas Jenson 1469 Hamburgerfonts Stempel Schneidler 1936 F.H.Ernst Schneidler Hamburgerfonts Adobe Jenson 1996 Robert Slimbach after Nicolas Jenson 1470 Typeface history: Old Style Medium contrast, more vertical axis, fewer “pen” flourishes Hamburgerfonts Stempel Garamond 1928 Stempel Type Foundry after Claude Garamond 1592 Hamburgerfonts Caslon 1990 Carol Twombley after William Caslon 1722 Hamburgerfonts Bembo 1929 Stanley Morison after Francesco Griffo 1495 Hamburgerfonts Janson 1955 Hermann Zapf after Miklós Tótfalusi Kis 1680 Typeface
  • CSS Font Stacks by Classification

    CSS Font Stacks by Classification

    CSS font stacks by classification Written by Frode Helland When Johann Gutenberg printed his famous Bible more than 600 years ago, the only typeface available was his own. Since the invention of moveable lead type, throughout most of the 20th century graphic designers and printers have been limited to one – or perhaps only a handful of typefaces – due to costs and availability. Since the birth of desktop publishing and the introduction of the worlds firstWYSIWYG layout program, MacPublisher (1985), the number of typefaces available – literary at our fingertips – has grown exponen- tially. Still, well into the 21st century, web designers find them selves limited to only a handful. Web browsers depend on the users own font files to display text, and since most people don’t have any reason to purchase a typeface, we’re stuck with a selected few. This issue force web designers to rethink their approach: letting go of control, letting the end user resize, restyle, and as the dynamic web evolves, rewrite and perhaps also one day rearrange text and data. As a graphic designer usually working with static printed items, CSS font stacks is very unfamiliar: A list of typefaces were one take over were the previous failed, in- stead of that single specified Stempel Garamond 9/12 pt. that reads so well on matte stock. Am I fighting the evolution? I don’t think so. Some design principles are universal, independent of me- dium. I believe good typography is one of them. The technology that will let us use typefaces online the same way we use them in print is on it’s way, although moving at slow speed.
  • Serif Fonts Vol 2

    Serif Fonts Vol 2

    Name Chaparral Pro Basic Latin ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ 24 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 18 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 12 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 10 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 8 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog Name Chaparral Pro Bold Basic Latin ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ 24 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 18 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 12 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 10 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 8 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog Name Chaparral Pro Bold Italic Basic Latin ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ 24 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 18 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 12 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 10 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 8 Te quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog Name Chaparral Pro Italic Basic Latin ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - .
  • Choosing Fonts – Quick Tips

    Choosing Fonts – Quick Tips

    Choosing Fonts – Quick Tips 1. Choose complementary fonts – choose a font that matches the mood of your design. For business cards, it is probably best to choose a classic font. *Note: These fonts are not available in Canva, but are in the Microsoft Office Suite. For some good Canva options, go to this link – https://www.canva.com/learn/canva-for-work-brand-fonts/ Examples: Serif Fonts: Sans Serif Fonts: Times New Roman Helvetica Cambria Arial Georgia Verdana Courier New Calibri Century Schoolbook 2. Establish a visual hierarchy – Use fonts to separate different types of information and guide the reader - Use different fonts, sizes, weights (boldness), and even color - Example: Heading (Helvetica, SZ 22, Bold) Sub-heading (Helvetica, SZ 16, Italics) Body Text (Garamond, SZ 12, Regular) Captions (Garamond, SZ 10, Regular 3. Mix Serifs and Sans Serifs – This is one of the best ways to add visual interest to type. See in the above example how I combined Helvetica, a sans serif font, with Garamond, a serif font. 4. Create Contrast, Not Conflict: Fonts that are too dissimilar may not pair well together. Contrast is good, but fonts need a connecting element. Conflict Contrast 5. Use Fonts from the Same Family: These fonts were created to work together. For example, the fonts in the Arial or Courier families. 6. Limit Your Number of Fonts: No more than 2 or 3 is a good rule – for business cards, choose 2. 7. Trust Your Eye: These are not concrete rules – you will know if a design element works or not! .
  • Background a Short Introduction to Font Characteristics

    Background a Short Introduction to Font Characteristics

    fonts: background A short introduction to font characteristics Maarten Gelderman Hardly anyone will dispute the statement that proporion- ally spaced fonts are more beautiful and legible than mono- abstract spaced designs. In a monospaced design the letter i takes as Almost anyone who develops an interest in fonts is bound to much space as a letter m or W. Consequently, some char- be overwelmed by the bewildering variety of letterforms acters look simply too compressed, whereas around oth- available. The number of fonts available from commercial ers too much white space is found. Monospaced fonts are suppliers like Adobe, URW, LinoType and others runs into the simply not suited for body text. Only in situations where it thousands. A recent catalog issued by FontShop [Truong et al., is important that all characters are of equal width, e.g., in 1998] alone lists over 25.000 different varieties.1 And listings of computer programs, where it may be important somehow, although the differences of the individual letters are that each individual character can be discerned and where hardly noticable, each font has its own character, its own the layout of the program may depend on using mono- personality. Even the atmosphere elucided by a text set from spaced fonts, can the usage of a monospaced font be de- Adobe Garamond is noticably different from the atmosphere of the same text set from Stempel Garamond. Although fended. In most other situations, they should simply be decisions about the usage of fonts, will always remain in the avoided. realm of esthetics, some knowledge about font characteristics may nevertheless help to create some order and to find out Romans, italics and slant A second typeface character- why certain design decisions just do not work.
  • Designed by Zuzana Licko Licensed and Distributed by Emigre * Mr Eaves Type Specimen Mr Eaves Type Specimen

    Designed by Zuzana Licko Licensed and Distributed by Emigre * Mr Eaves Type Specimen Mr Eaves Type Specimen

    mr eaves type specimen 1 MReaves DesigneD by ZuZana Licko LicenseD anD DistributeD by emigre *www.emigre.com mr eaves type specimen mr eaves type specimen 2 Mr Eaves Design Notes 3 Mr Eaves is the often requested sans-serif companion to Mrs Eaves, one of Emigre’s classic typeface designs. Created by Zuzana Licko, this latest addition to the Emigre Type Library is based on the proportions of the original Mrs Eaves. aa gg tt Mr Eaves Sans and Mr Eaves Modern counterparts. A matching Modern family provides a less humanistic look, with simpler and more geometric-looking shapes, most noticeably in the squared-off aOriginal Mrs Eavesa Sans in black.d Mr Eaves Sans companiond font in white.ee terminals and symmetric lower case counters. This family has moved furthest from its roots, yet still contains some of Mrs Eaves’ DNA. Licko took some liberty with the design of Mr Eaves. One of the main concerns was to avoid creating a typeface that looked like it simply had its serifs cut off. And while it matches Mrs Eaves in weight, color, and armature, Mr Eaves stands as its own typeface with many unique charac- teristics. mMr Eaves Sans and Mrm Eaves Modern counterparts. ww The Modern Italic is free of tails, and overall the Modern exhibits more repetition of forms, projecting a cleaner look. This provides stronger differentiation from the serif version whenever a more contrasting look is f f tt cc desired. Deviations from the Mrs Eaves model are evident in the overall decrease of contrast, as well as in details such as the flag and tail of the f and j, and the finial of the t, which were shortened to maintain a cleaner, sans serif look.
  • Patrick Reagh Printers Note: the Number Following the Name Indicates the Monotype Series

    Patrick Reagh Printers Note: the Number Following the Name Indicates the Monotype Series

    Monotype typefaces available for fonts and composition at Patrick Reagh Printers note: the number following the name indicates the Monotype series. An e or an a after the number indicates either English- or American-manufactured matrices. R-roman / I-italic / SC-small caps / B-boldface lc-large composition* Antique 26a R 8 10 12 Baskerville 353a R/I/SC 7 8 10 11 12 Bembo 270e R/I/SC 8 10 11 12 13 14 (16 & 18 lc R/I) Narrow Bembo Italic 194e 10 12 13 (16 lc) Bodoni Medium 375a R/I/SC 8 10 12 Bodoni Book 875a R/I/SC 6 8 10 12 Bookman 98a R/I/SC 6 8 10 12 Bulmer 462a R/I/SC 6 8 9 10 12 (18 lc R) Centaur 252a (16 lc roman only) Cochin 61a R/I/SC 6 8 10 12 Deepdene 315a R/I/SC 6 8 10 12 Ehrhardt 453e R/I/SC 10 12 14 Fournier 185e R/I/SC 10 12 13 Franklin Gothic 107a R 6 8 10 12 Futura Light 606a R/I 6 8 10 12 Futura Medium /Extra Bold 605a & 603a R 6 8 10 12 Garamont 248a R/I/SC 8 10 12 Garamond Bold 548a R/I 6 8 10 12 Gill Sans 262e R/I/B 6 7 8 10 12 Goudy Bold 294a R/I 8 10 12 Goudy Modern 249e R/I/SC 8 10 11 12 Goudy Old Style 394a R/I/SC 6 8 10 12 Janson 401a R/I/SC 8 9 10 11 12 (14 & 18 lc R/I) Jenson Old Style 58a R 8 10 12 Sans Serif 329a (Kabel) R/B 8 10 12 Sans Serif Light/Bold 329a & 330a R 8 10 12 Univers Light 45e R/I 6 8 10 12 14 Univers Medium 55e R/I 6 8 10 12 14 Univers Bold 65e R/I 6 8 10 12 14 Univers Extra Bold 75e R/I 6 8 10 12 14 *Large composition can only be composed in roman or italic separately 1 Monotype display typefaces available for fonts at Patrick Reagh Printers note: the letter d following the size on English matrices indicates Didot which is the European standard for type sizing and is generally a point or two larger than the American point system.
  • Vision Performance Institute

    Vision Performance Institute

    Vision Performance Institute Technical Report Individual character legibility James E. Sheedy, OD, PhD Yu-Chi Tai, PhD John Hayes, PhD The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence the legibility of individual characters. Previous work in our lab [2], including the first study in this sequence, has studied the relative legibility of fonts with different anti- aliasing techniques or other presentation medias, such as paper. These studies have tested the relative legibility of a set of characters configured with the tested conditions. However the relative legibility of individual characters within the character set has not been studied. While many factors seem to affect the legibility of a character (e.g., character typeface, character size, image contrast, character rendering, the type of presentation media, the amount of text presented, viewing distance, etc.), it is not clear what makes a character more legible when presenting in one way than in another. In addition, the importance of those different factors to the legibility of one character may not be held when the same set of factors was presented in another character. Some characters may be more legible in one typeface and others more legible in another typeface. What are the character features that affect legibility? For example, some characters have wider openings (e.g., the opening of “c” in Calibri is wider than the character “c” in Helvetica); some letter g’s have double bowls while some have single (e.g., “g” in Batang vs. “g” in Verdana); some have longer ascenders or descenders (e.g., “b” in Constantia vs.