Magazine Kenneth D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
History 1890 – 1966
A HISTORY OF GLOUCESTER HARBOUR TRUSTEES By W. A. Stone Clerk to the Trustees 1958 -1966 PART 1 1890 - 1966 CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 Origin, Constitution and Membership, with details of Navigational Aids erected prior to the incorporation of the Gloucester Harbour Trustees on 5 July 1890 3 2 Navigational Aids 20 3 Finances 39 4 Spanning the Severn Estuary 51 5 New Works and other installation in the Severn Estuary 56 6 Stranding of Vessels and other Incidents 61 7 Northwick Moorings 71 8 Officers and Staff 74 1 FOREWORD In compiling this History I have endeavoured to give the reasons for the appointment of a body of Trustees to control a defined area of the Severn Estuary, and to tell of the great amount of work undertaken by the Trustees and the small staff in administering the requirements of the 1890 Act. It is probable that I have given emphasis to the erection and upkeep of the Navigational Aids, but it must be realised that this was the main requirement of the Act, to ensure that the Trustees, as a Harbour authority, disposed of their income in a manner which was calculated to benefit the navigation of the Severn Estuary. A great deal of research has been necessary and the advice and assistance given to me by the present Officers, and by others who held similar posts in the past, is greatly appreciated. Without their help the task would have been much more formidable. W A Stone Clerk to the Trustees December 1966 2 Chapter One ORIGIN, CONSTITUTION AND MEMBERSHIP WITH DETAILS OF NAVIGATIONAL AIDS ERECTED PRIOR TO THE INCORPORATION OF THE GLOUCESTER HARBOUR TRUSTEES ON 5 JULY 1890 To obtain the reasons for the constitution of a body of Trustees to control a defined area of the River Severn, it is necessary to go back to the year 1861. -
Educational Resource Pack Front Sheet
Educational Resource Pack Fellowship Afloat FELLOWSHIP AFLOAT CHARITABLE TRUST RESOURCES AND IDEAS FOR EDUCATIONAL VISITS TO TOLLESBURY Contents 1. Introduction to teachers accompanying Educational Visits to Fellowship Afloat. Useful materials to bring 2. The National Curriculum 3. The Lightvessel Suggestions for Preparation and Follow-up Lightvessel Tour Lightvessel Quiz Trinity House information 4. Boat Study 5. Habitat and Saltmarsh study The Saltmarsh Managed retreat Saltmarsh plants 6. Birds 7. Local area Borrowdyke Red Hills Extracts from Blackwater Matters Pill Boxes Yacht Stores Packing Shed 8. Dredging Benthos (animals that live on the river bed) 9. Tollesbury village Suggestions for Preparatory Work Quiz Study 10. Basic principles of sailing 11. Local maps, charts and walks 12. Ideas for language development 13. Bibliography FELLOWSHIP AFLOAT CHARITABLE TRUST • THE SAIL LOFTS • WOODROLFE ROAD TOLLESBURY • ESSEX • CM9 8SE • TEL: 01621 868113 • FAX: 01621 869771 E-mail: [email protected] • Web site: www.fact.co.uk Fellowship Afloat Charitable Trust is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered office as above. Company No: 3264887 Charity No: 1059143 Introduction Fellowship Afloat have been receiving Junior School groups on board since1980 and are able to provide a great deal of expertise and local knowledge. Living on board is an amazing experience and we have no doubt that your visit will be worthwhile, educationally and socially. The aim of this resource book is to give you information and ideas, so that you and the children can derive the maximum benefit whilst you are in Tollesbury. We are happy to meet with teachers beforehand to organise the programme and plan the visit to suit individual requirements. -
Celebrating 30 Years
VOLUME XXX NUMBER FOUR, 2014 Celebrating 30 Years •History of the U.S. Lighthouse Society •History of Fog Signals The•History Keeper’s of Log—Fall the U.S. 2014 Lighthouse Service •History of the Life-Saving Service 1 THE KEEPER’S LOG CELEBRATING 30 YEARS VOL. XXX NO. FOUR History of the United States Lighthouse Society 2 November 2014 The Founder’s Story 8 The Official Publication of the Thirty Beacons of Light 12 United States Lighthouse Society, A Nonprofit Historical & AMERICAN LIGHTHOUSE Educational Organization The History of the Administration of the USLH Service 23 <www.USLHS.org> By Wayne Wheeler The Keeper’s Log(ISSN 0883-0061) is the membership journal of the U.S. CLOCKWORKS Lighthouse Society, a resource manage- The Keeper’s New Clothes 36 ment and information service for people By Wayne Wheeler who care deeply about the restoration and The History of Fog Signals 42 preservation of the country’s lighthouses By Wayne Wheeler and lightships. Finicky Fog Bells 52 By Jeremy D’Entremont Jeffrey S. Gales – Executive Director The Light from the Whale 54 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By Mike Vogel Wayne C. Wheeler President Henry Gonzalez Vice-President OUR SISTER SERVICE RADM Bill Merlin Treasurer Through Howling Gale and Raging Surf 61 Mike Vogel Secretary By Dennis L. Noble Brian Deans Member U.S. LIGHTHOUSE SOCIETY DEPARTMENTS Tim Blackwood Member Ralph Eshelman Member Notice to Keepers 68 Ken Smith Member Thomas A. Tag Member THE KEEPER’S LOG STAFF Head Keep’—Wayne C. Wheeler Editor—Jeffrey S. Gales Production Editor and Graphic Design—Marie Vincent Copy Editor—Dick Richardson Technical Advisor—Thomas Tag The Keeper’s Log (ISSN 0883-0061) is published quarterly for $40 per year by the U.S. -
What Is a Lighthouse? a Modern Definition
What Is A Lighthouse? A Modern Definition By Ken Trethewey Introduction Many of the published definitions for the term ‘lighthouse’ are inadequate in today’s English language cultures. A proposed new definition of a lighthouse is: A fully or partially enclosed built structure bearing a light that is used as a navigational aid, and that is capable of admitting at least one person to operate or maintain the light entirely from within. Structures that were once lighthouses, but are no longer lit are known as historic lighthouses. In this paper the author describes a set of definitions suitable for use in pharology, and especially in applications involving databases. The differences between various kinds of navigational aids are explained. The Terminology of Navigational Aids The origin of lightstructures for assistance with marine navigation at night is lost in the unwritten pages of history, for we are fairly sure that the first lighthouses were built before humans committed their thoughts to paper (or the equivalent medium of the time).1 In the English language this lighthouse legacy, spanning about three millennia, inevitably leads to imprecise use of terms associated with lighthouses and navigation, a matter that can be of importance in different situations. Humans grow up learning how to interpret the ambiguities that commonly arise in daily life. For example, people easily distinguish words that sound identical but which have different meanings: bow and bough is a typical example. Sometimes two people use the same word to mean different things. This is not easy to deal with and, if a question is not asked to resolve the uncertainty, a mistake may be made. -
Fog Horn Spring'09
THE FOG HORN I WILL NOT ABANDON YOU LIGHTSHIP NOT IN CORRECT POSITION Volume 2 Issue 24 Newsletter of The U.S. Coast Guard Lightship Sailors Association SPRING 2009 PRESIDENT • Larry Ryan 1st VICE PRESIDENT • George (Skip) Coleman 2nd VICE PRESIDENT My Brother Lightship Sailors, Members and Friends: • Bob Gubitosi We have several feature articles in this edition. Our Lightship Sailors Collection inside The CG Heri- tage Museum under the tutelage of Bill Collette continues to grow with additional items both loaned SECRETARY and MEMBERSHIP and donated. Certainly one of our most treasured items for this period is the uniform worn by George • Dave Orszak Rongner when serving as the commanding officer of the Buzzards Bay Lightship. And we are long TREASURER overdue on featuring The Five Fathom Lightship as our Lightship of the Quarter. And we seemed to • Fred A. Pelger have had an unusual amount of late breaking news both Coast Guard and Lightship Sailors in this past DIRECTORS AT LARGE: quarter. Please read and mark your calendars regarding the following notice. • Bernie Byrnes • Rick Gryder • Peter Marx ***VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE*** VETERAN AFFAIRS: Since the last issue of our newsletter, several incidences involving either our members or ‘Coasties’ • Bernie Byrnes in general has occurred. We tried to pass the information to our members in a timely fashion by e- SPECIAL PROJECTS mail, with only 50% success due to incorrect e-mail addresses. Some of these have not been up- • Bob Gubitosi dated in several years. Plus many of our members have since acquired an email address which we do Arts and Graphics not have on record. -
159 \ Some History of the Coastwise Lights Of
159 \ SOME HISTORY OF THE COASTWISE LIGHTS OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE PART II By E. Cuthbert Woods, L.D.S.R.C.S.(Eng.), F.R.Hist.S. \ Read 27 October, 1945. "DEFORE we leave the Mersey estuary, a word or two about -^-* the lightships may not be out of place. The earliest reference that I have found to a lightship per se, is the resolution passed by the Liverpool Council in 1759, to fix a vessel with two lights at the N.E. spit of the Hoyle Bank, " which will tend greatly to the preservation of lives and property, and hope it may induce our captains and masters to inform themselves how to bring a vessel into the Hoyle Lake, without, as was formerly the case, trusting to the chance of meeting a pilot." Twenty years earlier (1738), there is a resolution of the Cor poration " that an addition be made to the present dock, or basin, for light ships to lie in, whilst refitting . ." but this I take to mean ships which had discharged their cargo, and were " light." By 1811, the Mersey was beginning to be used by ships, in preference to the Hoyle Lake, and the mariners bringing ships into the port after dark had to rely on five lighthouses, viz. Pt. Lynas, Upper and Lower Hoylake, Leasowe, and Bidston. Some of the leading shipowners of Liverpool petitioned the Dock Committee to replace the North West Buoy by a lightship, as there were as yet no lighted buoys. The Dock Committee, having an act (53 George III) which empowered them to place a lightship on the N.W. -
SRC-Skriptum
Maritime Radio Operator Certificate of Competence SHORT RANGE CERTIFICATE Nautic Academy KG Martin Kempf - www.segeln.co.at INHALT: 1. WAS IST GMDSS? ..................................................................................................4 2. FUNKANLAGEN IM GMDSS...................................................................................4 2.1. DSC-Seefunkanlagen DSC = Digital Selective Calling..................................................................................4 2.2. UKW-DSC-Seefunkanlagen.................................................................................4 3. GRUNDREGELN IM SPRECHFUNK:......................................................................8 4. KANALVERTEILUNG – CHANNEL ALLOCATION:...............................................8 5. SIMPLEX – DUPLEX:...............................................................................................9 5.1. Simplex = Wechselsprechen: .............................................................................9 5.2. Duplex = Gegensprechen: ..................................................................................9 5.3. Semiduplex: .........................................................................................................9 6. KENNZEICHNUNG DER FUNKSTELLEN:.............................................................9 6.1. Name und Rufzeichen:.........................................................................................9 6.2. MMSI (Maritime Mobile Service Identity)..........................................................9 -
Organizations and Efficiency in Lighthouses: the English
Organizations and efficiency in lighthouses: the English case revisited Oliver Dunn1, Dan Bogart2, Eduard J Alvarez-Palau3, and Leigh Shaw Taylor4 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE Abstract5 Complex policy challenges in the infrastructure sector are seen in a fresh light when studying one of the most celebrated historical examples: lighthouses in England. We show that in 1832, the largest actor in the market, Trinity, provided services more efficiently than numerous private operators. Trinity’s advantages partly came from lower revenue collection costs. Moreover, Trinity was pressured into charging lower prices, which proved illuminating to policy makers. While much of analysis shows the advantages of Trinity, we document that privates built many more lighthouses. Trinity became active only after a technological shock which increased the utility of lights. Finally, our analysis sheds light on a largely ignored provider: harbour authorities. They relied on alternative pricing and bundling strategies, achieved low operating costs, and served in markets largely ignored by Trinity and privates. 1 Research Associate in History, University of Cambridge, [email protected] 2 Professor, Department of Economics, UC Irvine, [email protected] 3 Senior Lecturer, Economics and Business, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, [email protected] 4 Senior Lecturer, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge, [email protected] 5 New data for this paper was created thanks to grants from the Keynes Fund at Cambridge University. Earlier grants from the Leverhulme Trust grant (RPG-2013-093) Transport and Urbanization c.1670-1911 and NSF (SES-1260699), Modelling the Transport Revolution and the Industrial Revolution in England helped develop prior data. -
NAVGUIDE Aids to Navigation Manual
NAVGUIDE Aids to Navigation Manual 2010 Edition IALA Aids to Navigation Manual NAVGUIDE 2010 AISM-IALA : 20 ter rue Schnapper - 78100 Saint-Germain en Laye - France Telephone: + 33 1 34 51 70 01 - fax: + 33 1 34 51 82 05 e-mail : [email protected] - internet: www.iala-aism.org © IALA-AISM 2010 Reproduction for training / educational purposes permitted. FOREWORD The IALA NAVGUIDE 2010 will be of interest and assistance to all organisations, training institutions and individuals who are associated with aids to navigation (AtoN). This sixth edition has been developed over the past four years (2006 – 2010), and represents a continuing commitment to excellence and clarity of presentation. A key change from the 2006 version is the focus on e-navigation in recognition of the extensive conceptual work done to date, the central role e-navigation is expected to play in the future work program of IALA and its impact on the way Competent Authorities provide an aids to navigation service to mariners in the longer term. The IALA Aids to Navigation Management (ANM) Committee has coordinated the review of the IALA NAVGUIDE. All sections have been reviewed and revisions made through expert input from all of the IALA Committees – ANM, Engineering, Environment and Preservation (EEP), e-Navigation (e-NAV) and Vessel Traffic Services (VTS). This NAVGUIDE is a tribute to professionals already very busy in their own organisations worldwide, who are happy to share their expertise with other members of the international maritime community to assist in reaching the ultimate goal of harmonization of maritime aids to navigation. -
Shippingnews and Gossip Ofthe Water Front
the sak francisco; caia, Sunday,; otne 21, -1308. 43 \u25a0 :.\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0>*"-,\u25a0. v . --V- -.-\u25a0\u25a0-•"- '>-•;\u25a0\u25a0• •\u25a0.:•> \u25a0 -\u25a0--'\u25a0: -.<- * - — ' • for San Francisco. The schooner -H. X..Hall except the' Garfleld were chartered prior to ar- llarshfield. for Saa Francisco. PUERTO MEXlCO—Sailed June 19 Stml will load lumber tomorrow ; for. Kobe.' The rtval.•\u25a0-.-.•.. \u25a0'-.\u25a0\u25a0- ,-.-: -•.•..-.-..- -.- \u25a0 .- \u25a0- .\u25a0 ASTORlA—Arrived Jnn» 20—Stmr Atlia, Hawaiian, for Delaware Breakwater. river at this place Is expected to begin falling ,to Mariners hence June 17. — OCEAN— STEAMERS — Weather Report .Notice Sailed,' having , \u25a0 -June -10 Stmr Cascade, for Saa Fran- CHERBOURG Arrived June 20 Stmr Oro*. after reached . a height 21 \u25a0 light 83, page 22, No. 80 -• • tomorrow \u25a0\u0084 ' ioft. Blunts reef vessel N0.' \u25a0 .: • - - < ctsco. .-'.:\u25a0• . ».•\u25a0.-»- ser Kurtuerst. from New York, via Plymouth, ' at the Cascades to Daymarks, Pacific \u25a0 • - feet. % The locks are closed CIAaU Lights, Buoys i Shipping of and Sailed June 20—Stmr Rose City, for;Ban ?fnd \u25a0 proceeded. United States Department of Agrlculture-^- . for Gossip navigation, but probably-will opened Monday. Coast, 38), stationed miles 61 de- Bremen. - News be 1908, page and Ift Francisco, Bureau, Francisco, 20, 1 ' r Sailed June 19—Stmr from Ham- Weather Kan Juno 1008. The iHarriman liner Rose City sailed -for, San grees 20:minutes (SW S) from Blunts reef, . \u25a0 . % \ COOS BA June 20— Redondo, burg and Southampton, for New RAINFALL DATA this ;morning. \u25a0 Two charters were ait, California, miles So Y-^Arrived Stair York. Francisco • off the seacoast of and 4% faence June stmr M. -
Records of the Corporation of Trinity House
RESEARCH GUIDE 51 - Records of the Corporation of Trinity House CONTENTS Introduction Background General lighthouse authority for England, Wales, the Channel Islands and Gibraltar Charitable organisation for the relief of mariners and their dependants Other functions and records Records held elsewhere Introduction The records of the Corporation of Trinity House have suffered from fire in 1666 and 1714 and from bombing in 1940. Though the court minutes survive from 1661, many other series of records are only present from the 19th century. Because of the many ways in which the Corporation of Trinity House has touched on British maritime life, the records which survive are still very rich and extremely varied. NB: The archive is subject to a thirty year closure period and researchers must seek permission to see any record less than thirty years old. Please ask staff at the Information Desk or email [email protected] for further details. Background The Corporation of Trinity House was incorporated by royal charter in 1514. There is a tradition which dates the existence of a Trinity guild from the 13th century but there is no firm evidence to support this. When the charter was granted, Trinity House had a hall and almshouses at Deptford. Premises were acquired in Ratcliff and Stepney in the 17th century and meetings were held at all three sites. The Corporation bought a property in Water Lane in the City of London in 1660. The Hall in Water Lane burnt down and was rebuilt twice, in 1666 and 1714. When it proved too cramped for proposed improvements in the 1790s, the Corporation bought land at Tower Hill on which Trinity House was built 1793-6. -
Alternate Use Study Surplus Lighthouses, Canada
Alternate Use Study Surplus Lighthouses, Canada Final Report March 2011 Prepared for: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Prepared by: Room 10E262, 10th Floor CRG Consulting 200 Kent Street 325-301 Moodie Drive Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, ON K2H 9C4 K1A 0E6 Tel: (613) 596-2910 Fax: (613) 820-4718 www.thecrg.com In Association with: Colliers International 1 Table of Contents Alternate Use Study Surplus Lighthouses, Canada ....................................................................... 1 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Mandate and Approach ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Research Findings ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Alternate Uses ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 Ownership Models ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Disposal Processes ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Key Success Factors ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.5 Portfolio Tiering ........................................................................................................................