DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Dye Tracing in Water- Resources Investigations in Wyoming, 1967-94

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Dye Tracing in Water- Resources Investigations in Wyoming, 1967-94 USE OF DYE TRACING IN WATER- RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS IN WYOMING, 1967-94 By James F. Wilson, Jr. and James G. Rankl U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4122 Cheyenne, Wyoming 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Branch of Information Services 2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite B Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001-5662 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract...........................................................^ 1 Introduction..............................................................................................._^ 2 Chronology of dye tracing in water-resources investigations in Wyoming.......................................................................... 3 Time of travel and dispersion of solutes in streams.............................................................................................................. 4 Methods....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Wind/Bighorn River, 1971.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Green River and tributaries, 1975-77.......................................................................................................................... 8 Little Snake River, 1976-77........................................................................................................................................ 10 North Platte River, 1978, 1985.................................................................................................................................... 12 Reaeration coefficients in streams......................................................................................................................................... 14 Methods....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 North Platte River, 1985.............................................................................................................................................. 16 Discharge measurements in streams ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Methods....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Laramie River under ice, 1967.................................................................................................................................... 20 North and South Brush Creeks, 1967-68 .................................................................................................................... 22 Physical setting ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Data collection.................................................................................................................................................. 24 Results............................................................................................................................................................... 26 South Piney Creek, 1971-78 ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Madison Limestone recharge study, 1975-78 ............................................................................................................. 30 Data collection .................................................................................................................................................. 30 Results............................................................................................................................................................... 32 Other measurements, 1971-82 .................................................................................................................................... 34 Investigations in karst terrane ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Methods...........................................................^ 36 North Fork Powder River below Dullknife Reservoir, 1970...................................................................................... 38 North Fork Crazy Woman Creek, 1974 ...................................................................................................................... 40 Little Tongue River and Tongue River Cave, 1974 .................................................................................................... 42 Middle Popo Agie River in Sinks Canyon State Park, 1983 ...................................................................................... 44 Physical setting ................................................................................................................................................. 44 Data collection .................................................................................................................................................. 46 Results............................................................................................................................................................... 48 Smith Creek below Otter Creek, 1991........................................................................................................................ 50 Other investigations .............................................................................................................................................................. 52 Methods....................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Pass Creek flow tagging, 1967.................................................................................................................................... 53 Old Faithful wastewater lagoon, 1975-76................................................................................................................... 54 Interstate Highway 25 edgedrain test, 1989................................................................................................................ 56 F.E. Warren Air Force Base fire-protection training area, 1990 ................................................................................. 58 Summary and conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 60 References.........................................................................................................................................................^ 63 Contents iii FIGURES Page 1. Typical response curve (concentration-time curve) at a point downstream from slug injection of a solute, such as a tracer dye................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Example of dye-response curves at several sampling sites for a single injection of dye, Wind/Bighorn River, March 1971 ............................................................................................................................................ 5 3. Example of graphical relation of time of travel to distance traveled, Wind/Bighorn River, 1971........................ 5 4. Map showing location of streamflow-gaging stations and dye-injection and sampling sites, Wind/Bighorn River.......................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Graph showing relation of time of travel to water discharge, Wind/Bighorn River.............................................. 7 6. Map showing location of streamflow-gaging stations and dye-injection and sampling sites, Green River, East Fork River, Big Sandy River, Horse Creek, and Blacks Fork............................................. 9 7. Graph showing relation of mean velocity to water discharge at two streamflow-gaging stations and in a 70.3-mile reach, Green River downstream from Fontenelle Reservoir......................................................... 9 8. Map showing location of streamflow-gaging stations and dye-injection and sampling sites, Little Snake River............................................................................................................................................. 11 9. Graph showing relation of time of travel to water discharge at streamflow-gaging station 09257000, Little Snake River near Dixon, Wyoming......................................................................................................... 11 10. Map showing location of streamflow-gaging stations and dye-injection and sampling sites, North Platte River........................................................................................................................................................ 13 11-13. Graphs showing:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary Terms
    Glossary Terms € 1584 5W6 5501 a 7181, 12203 5’UTR 8126 a-g Transformation 6938 6Q1 5500 r 7181 6W1 5501 b 7181 a 12202 b-b Transformation 6938 A 12202 d 7181 AAV 10815 Z 1584 Abandoned mines 6646 c 5499 Abiotic factor 148 f 5499 Abiotic 10139, 11375 f,b 5499 Abiotic stress 1, 10732 f,i, 5499 Ablation 2761 m 5499 ABR 1145 th 5499 Abscisic acid 9145 th,Carnot 5499 Absolute humidity 893 th,Otto 5499 Absorbed dose 3022, 4905, 8387, 8448, 8559, 11026 v 5499 Absorber 2349 Ф 12203 Absorber tube 9562 g 5499 Absorption, a(l) 8952 gb 5499 Absorption coefficient 309 abs lmax 5174 Absorption 309, 4774, 10139, 12293 em lmax 5174 Absorptivity or absorptance (a) 9449 μ1, First molecular weight moment 4617 Abstract community 3278 o 12203 Abuse 6098 ’ 5500 AC motor 11523 F 5174 AC 9432 Fem 5174 ACC 6449, 6951 r 12203 Acceleration method 9851 ra,i 5500 Acceptable limit 3515 s 12203 Access time 1854 t 5500 Accessible ecosystem 10796 y 12203 Accident 3515 1Q2 5500 Acclimation 3253, 7229 1W2 5501 Acclimatization 10732 2W3 5501 Accretion 2761 3 Phase boundary 8328 Accumulation 2761 3D Pose estimation 10590 Acetosyringone 2583 3Dpol 8126 Acid deposition 167 3W4 5501 Acid drainage 6665 3’UTR 8126 Acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) 167 4W5 5501 Acid (rock or mine) drainage 6646 12316 Glossary Terms Acidity constant 11912 Adverse effect 3620 Acidophile 6646 Adverse health effect 206 Acoustic power level (LW) 12275 AEM 372 ACPE 8123 AER 1426, 8112 Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) 4997, Aerobic 10139 11129 Aerodynamic diameter 167, 206 ACS 4957 Aerodynamic
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
    Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 September 7, 2017 Draft Pre-Decisional Document - Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary and Interpretation of Dye-Tracer Tests to Investigate The
    SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF DYE-TRACER TESTS TO INVESTIGATE THE HYDRAULIC CONNECTION OF FRACTURES AT A RIDGE-AND-VALLEY- WALL SITE, NEAR FISHTRAP LAKE, PIKE COUNTY, KENTUCKY By Charles J. Taylor U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4189 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT Louisville, Kentucky 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Office Open-File Reports Section 2301 Bradley Avenue Box 25286, MS 517 Louisville, KY 40217 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................~^ 1 Introduction.........................................................................._^ Purpose and scope.......................................................................................................................................................3 Description of study site............................................................................................................................................. 3 Geologic setting ...................................................................................................................................................3 Hydrogeologic framework...................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • LSWEETWATER Z^A,,, WILD and SCENIC RIVER STUDY REPORT S&Ws^D °QG4
    t File LSWEETWATER z^a,,, 1 WILD AND SCENIC 1 RIVER STUDY REPORT 1 1 l 1 U S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1 Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service 1 Mid-Continent Region 1 1 March 1978 ON MICROFILM PLEASE RE U iN Ta CENTER TECIHNNICAL tP-WWORMATIONIC C ws^ D °QG4 ENTER s& SERVICE NgIOALEPARK As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, pre- serving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under United States administration. Department of the Interior Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service Chris T. Delaporte, Director This report was prepared pursuant to Public Law 90-542, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Publication of the findings herein should not be construed as representing either the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior. This report provides information for further consideration by the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, the Secretary of the Interior, other Federal and State agencies, and the public. March 1978 t 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Abstracts from the 2007 National Speleological Society Convention Marengo, Indiana
    2007 NSS CONVENTION ABSTRACTS SELECTED ABSTRACTS FROM THE 2007 NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CONVENTION MARENGO, INDIANA BIOSPELEOLOGY Palpigradida (1), Araneae (6), Opiliones (2), Pseudoscorpiones (3), Copepoda (5), Ostracoda (2), Decapoda (4), Isopoda (7), Amphipoda THE SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA OF INDIANA (12), Chilopoda (2), Diplopoda (4), Collembola (4), Diplura (1), Julian J. Lewis and Salisa L. Lewis Thysanura (1), Coleoptera (14), and Vertebrata (1). Vjetrenica is also Lewis & Associates LLC, Cave, Karst & Groundwater Biological Consulting; 17903 the type locality for 37 taxa, including16 endemics and 3 monotypic State Road 60, Borden, IN 47106-8608, USA, [email protected] genera: Zavalia vjetrenicae (Gastropoda), Troglomysis vjetrenicensis Within Indiana are two distinct cave areas, the south-central karst (Crustacea) and Nauticiella stygivaga (Coleoptera). Some groups have containing most of the state’s 2,000+ caves, and the glaciated southeastern not yet been studied or described (Nematoda, Oligochaeta, Thysanura). karst. Field work from 1971 to present resulted in sampling over 500 caves Due to changes in hydrology, highway building, intensive agriculture, for fauna. Approximately 100 species of obligate cavernicoles have been garbage delay, local quarrying, and lack of state protection mechanisms, discovered, with over 70 of these occurring in the south-central karst area. Vjetrenica is strongly endangered. Besides continuing research, protection Dispersal into the southeastern cave area was limited to the period after of the whole drainage area, along with sustainable cave management, is the recession of the Illinoian ice sheet, accounting for the paucity of fauna, necessary. with only 30 obligate cavernicoles known. The fauna of southeastern Indiana is believed to have dispersed into the area during the Wisconsin MARK-RECAPTURE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATES OF THE MADISON glaciation, whereas the south-central karst has been available for CAVE ISOPOD, ANTROLANA LIRA colonization over a longer time.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Guide
    COLORfUL PAST \iYOMIN6 Since the 16th Century, a number of governments have claimed parts of what is now the State of Wyoming. The following national flags have. flown STUDE~ GUIDE over the Wyoming Territory: France, ~ Great Britain, Mexico, Spain, Texas and the United States. Wyoming officially became the 44th U.S. state in 1890. 'The name Wyoming was adopted from two Algonquin Indian words meaning "at the big plains" or "large prairie place." Gold in California and the lure of rich land in Oregon brought increasing numbers of pioneer wagon trains rolling over the Oregon Trail through Wyoming. Soldiers came to protect the wagon trains from Indians, and they also established forts along the trails. The most important of the western military posts was Fort Laramie in southeastern Wyoming. Fort Laramie became a haven for gold seekers and weary emigrants. It was also an important station for the Pony Express and the Overland Stagecoaches, and it served as a vital military post in the wars with the Plains Indians. Chief Washakie (WASH-ah-key) became known as the Indian Chief that helps white men. He '" assisted the U.S. military in their campaigns > against the Sioux and Cheyenne tribes. i:<.> ~ Washakie was chief of the Eastern Shoshones '" 1ij for sixty years and is the only Native American 1i5 OJ to have a military fort named after him. Chief <= E Washakie signed the treaty that established the 0 ~ boundaries of what is now the Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming. A graveyard in the town of Fort Washakie houses a substantial granite memorial with an inscription that reads: "Always loyal to the government and his white brothers." Chief Washakie Great herds of buffalo once grazed on the rolling hills of Wyoming, giving rise to one of the state's best known citizens, William F.
    [Show full text]
  • SOAR 2021 Wyoming State Parks, Historic
    Kite Festival at Hot Springs State Park SOAR 2021 Wyoming State Parks, Historic Black & Orange Cabins at Fort Bridger Sites & Trails Strategic Plan Kayaking at Curt Gowdy State Park CCC Castle at Guernsey State Park Broom Making at Wyoming Terrorial Prison Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................2 Executive Summary.................................................................................3 Mission and Vision Statement...............................................................5 Introduction..............................................................................................6 Information.Collection........................................................................6 Wyoming.Tourism.Industry.Master.Plan,.2010.–.2020...................6 Development.of.the.SOAR..................................................................7 Implementation.and.Tracking.Progress.Of..The.SOAR......................7 SPHST Overview and Statistics..............................................................8 Philosophy...........................................................................................8 Function...............................................................................................8 Organization/Staffing....................................................................... 10 Facilities............................................................................................ 11 History..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lahaina Groundwater Tracer Study Lahaina, Maui, Hawai‘I
    Lahaina Groundwater Tracer Study Lahaina, Maui, Hawai‘i Final Report Craig R. Glenn, Robert B. Whittier, Meghan L. Dailer, Henrieta Dulaiova, Aly I. El-Kadi, Joseph Fackrell, Jacque L. Kelly, Christine A. Waters and Jeff Sevadjian June 2013 Prepared For State of Hawaii Department of Health U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Principal Investigator: Craig R. Glenn School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Hawai‘i at Manoa Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 LAHAINA GROUNDWATER TRACER STUDY – LAHAINA, MAUI, HAWAII Final Report Craig R. Glenn, Robert B. Whittier, Meghan L. Dailer, Henrieta Dulaiova, Aly I. El-Kadi, Joseph Fackrell, Jacque L. Kelly, Christine A. Waters and Jeff Sevadjian June 2013 PREPARED FOR State of Hawaii Department of Health U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Principal Investigator: Craig R. Glenn School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation: Glenn, C.R., Whittier, R.B., Dailer, M.L., Dulaiova, H., El-Kadi, A.I., Fackrell, J., Kelly, J.L., Waters, C.A., and J. Sevadjian, 2013. Lahaina Groundwater Tracer Study – Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii, Final Report, prepared for the State of Hawaii Department of Health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center This page is intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluorescent Dye Tracer Test at the W-Canal Aquifer Recharge Site
    Idaho Department of Water Resources Open File Report FLUORESCENT DYE TRACER TEST AT THE W-CANAL AQUIFER RECHARGE SITE By Neal Farmer and Dennis Owsley Idaho Department of Water Resources March 11, 2009 Idaho Department of Water Resources ABSTRACT A tracer test was successfully conducted at the W-Canal Recharge site on the Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer during the fall of 2008. The W-Canal Recharge site is pilot scale recharge site that was designed to investigate the potential of artificially recharging the declining water levels of the ESPA. The source of the recharge water for the project was canal water, derived from the existing W-Canal that flows adjacent to the site. Approximately 4.6 acre-feet (AF) were diverted from the canal into the constructed seepage basins on the site on October 8, 2008. The poor water quality of the canal water raised public health and safety concerns due to the potential of contaminating the aquifer through this recharge effort. To provide a measure of safety and a mechanism to track the movement of the recharged water, a Fluorescein dye was added to the seepage basins as they were being filled. Following the infiltration of the diverted water, nearby domestic and monitoring wells were routinely sampled for the dye, with detections only present in the closest monitoring well. The detected concentrations in the monitoring well have provided valuable information regarding the seepage rates, movement, and potential for additional recharge and tracer investigations to be conducted on the ESPA. TABLE OF CONTENTS By Farmer and Owsley ii 3/13/2009 Title Page ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Dye Tracing to Determine the Direction of Ground-Water Flow in Karst Terrane at the Kentucky State University Research Farm Near Frankfort, Kentucky
    USE OF DYE TRACING TO DETERMINE THE DIRECTION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW IN KARST TERRANE AT THE KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FARM NEAR FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY By D. S. Mull U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4063 Prepared in cooperation with the KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY Louisville, Kentucky 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section District Office Box 25425, Mail Stop 517 2301 Bradley Avenue Federal Center Louisville, KY 40217-1807 Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Page Abstract.......................................................... 1 Introduction...................................................... 1 Purpose and scope............................................. 2 Previous investigations....................................... 2 Acknowledgments............................................... 2 Description of study area......................................... 3 Location and extent of study area............................. 3 Physiography.................................................. 3 Geologic framework............................................ 6 Precipitation................................................. 7 Occurrence and movement of ground water....................... 7 Use of dye tracing to determine the direction of ground-water flow..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    05_255629 ch01.qxp 4/18/08 6:13 PM Page 4 1 The Best of Montana & Wyoming A mix of the rugged Wild West, the even more rugged Rocky Mountains, and a few almost-modern cities—or what we might call overgrown cow towns—make the states of Montana and Wyoming delightful vacation spots. This is especially true for people who savor outdoor adventures, but it’s also the case for those looking to discover a part of the United States that many of us have seen only in the movies and on television (and that’s a rather distorted view). Here you’ll find some of the most breathtaking scenery in America; a vast array of wildlife that not only thinks it owns the place, but actually does; and even some first-class Western-style lodges, restaurants, and museums. Following are what I consider some of the best experiences in Montana and Wyoming. 1 The Best Vacation Experiences • Glacier National Park (MT): The • Grand Teton National Park (WY): best vacation spot in Montana is also The Grand Tetons are an excellent the most obvious one. By the stan- short course in Rocky Mountain dard of other crowded national parks, parks for travelers with less time: this spectacular country is virtually magnificent peaks rising from the undiscovered. See chapter 5. Snake River plain, alpine lakes, wild- • Yellowstone National Park (WY): flowers, and wildlife, all in a relatively It’s the crown jewel of American small park that can be seen in a few parks, and it remains the prime days or combined with Jackson for a attraction in the Rocky Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREDATOR DAMAGE and CONFLICT MANAGEMENT in WYOMING Prepared By
    PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREDATOR DAMAGE AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN WYOMING Prepared by: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS) WILDLIFE SERVICES (WS) - WYOMING Cooperating Agencies: United States Forest Service (USFS) Wyoming Animal Damage Management Board (ADMB) Wyoming Department of Agriculture (WDA) Wyoming Office of Stand Lands and Investments Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) Consulting Agencies: United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) July 2020 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms Used .......................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................9 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................9 1.2 In Brief, What is this EA About? .............................................................................................. 10 1.3 What Species are Included in this EA?...................................................................................... 12 1.4 What is the Value of Wildlife? ................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Why Do Wildlife Damage and Risks to Human Health and Safety Occur? .................................. 12 1.6 How Do People Feel About Wildlife? ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]