DOCSLIB.ORG

Bureau of Land Management Lander Field Office Resource Management Plan Revision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bureau of Land Management Lander Field Office Resource Management Plan Revision BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LANDER FIELD OFFICE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Requirements for ACEC Designation ............................................................................................... 2 3.1 Relevance Criteria ............................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Importance Criteria ............................................................................................................. 3 3.3 Need for Special Management ........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Evaluation Process ........................................................................................................................... 5 Lander Slope ACEC .......................................................................................................................... 9 Red Canyon ACEC .......................................................................................................................... 16 Whiskey Mountain ACEC............................................................................................................... 22 East Fork ACEC .............................................................................................................................. 26 Dubois Badlands ACEC .................................................................................................................. 30 Beaver Rim ACEC ........................................................................................................................... 33 Green Mountain ACEC .................................................................................................................. 39 National Historic Trails ACEC......................................................................................................... 43 South Pass Historic Mining Area ACEC .......................................................................................... 47 Castle Gardens Proposed ACEC ..................................................................................................... 52 Cedar Ridge ACEC .......................................................................................................................... 55 Continental Divide National Scenic Trail ACEC ............................................................................. 58 Sweetwater Rocks ACEC ............................................................................................................... 62 Government Draw‐Upper Sweetwater Sage‐Grouse ACEC .......................................................... 67 Regional Historic Trails and Early Highways ACEC ........................................................................ 72 Pathfinder Prairie Dog Complex ACEC .......................................................................................... 74 Blackjack Lek ACEC ........................................................................................................................ 76 Upper Willow Creek ACEC ............................................................................................................. 78 Sweetwater River Watershed ACEC .............................................................................................. 80 Water Quality ACEC ...................................................................................................................... 82 Riparian‐Wetlands ACEC ............................................................................................................... 84 Schoettlin Mountain ACEC ............................................................................................................ 86 Twin Creek ACEC ........................................................................................................................... 87 5.0 List of Preparers ............................................................................................................................. 92 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Relevance and Importance Criteria Determinations ................................................................ 5 Table 2. Summary of ACECs Reviewed in this Report ............................................................................. 6 ACEC Report Page i Acronyms and Abbreviations ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACEC Areas of Critical Environmental Concern AML Abandoned Mine Lands BLM Bureau of Land Management CDNST Continental Divide National Scenic Trail CFR Code of Federal Regulations ESA Endangered Species Act FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act GMCA Green Mountain Common Allotment GMSR Granite Mountains – Sweetwater Rocks ID Interdisciplinary INNS Invasive nonnative species LFO Lander Field Office NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NHT National Historic Trail NLCS National Landscape Conservation System NNL National Natural Landmark NSO No surface occupancy NTSA National Trails System Act OHV Off‐highway vehicle PFC Proper Functioning Condition RMP Resource Management Plan ROW Right‐of‐way SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer SRMA Special Recreation Management Area T&E Threatened and endangered TCP Traditional Cultural Property U.S. United States USFS United States Forest Service USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service VRM Visual Resource Management WGFD Wyoming Game and Fish Department WHMA Wildlife Habitat Management Area WSA Wilderness Study Area WUI Wildland urban interface Page ii ACEC Report Lander Field Office – RMP Revision – ACEC Report 1.0 Executive Summary As part of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Lander Field Office (LFO) Resource Management Plan (RMP) revision, the LFO Interdisciplinary (ID) Team followed federal guidelines and determined that sixteen (16) proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) satisfy the relevance and importance criteria, and special management practices necessary for ACEC designation. These are: National Register Historic Trail (existing) with expanded boundaries Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (new) Lander Slope (existing) Red Canyon (existing) Whiskey Mountain (existing) East Fork (existing) with expanded boundaries Dubois Badlands (existing) Beaver Rim (existing) with expanded boundaries Green Mountain (existing) with expanded boundaries South Pass Historic Mining Area (existing) with expanded boundaries Cedar Ridge (new) Castle Gardens (new) Regional Historic Trails (new) Sweetwater Rocks (new) Government Draw‐Upper Sweetwater Sage‐Grouse (new) (the Blackjack Lek, which is nominated as a separate ACEC, is located within the physical boundaries of the Government Draw‐Upper Sweetwater Sage‐Grouse ACEC. Twin Creek (new) For the areas found not to meet the relevance and importance criteria or do not require special management, the range of alternatives will include prescriptions to protect the identified values as required by guidance: the “management prescriptions which are eventually established in the plan for such areas shall reflect consideration of the identified values” (BLM Manual 1613.2.21). In addition to the proposed ACEC, the following ID Team received and evaluated the following nominations: Upper Willow Creek Sweetwater River Watershed Shallow or High‐Risk Aquifers Riparian‐Wetlands ACEC Report Page 1 Lander Field Office – RMP Revision – ACEC Report Schoettlin Mountain was considered by the ID Team, but not fully evaluated. The proponent was not able to provide enough information for the BLM to identify the values or resources to be protected. The proponent withdrew the nomination. This Draft ACEC Report presents each of the proposed ACEC and provides individual reports to explain why each area satisfied or failed to satisfy criteria for special consideration as an ACEC. 2.0 Introduction Under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 43 Code of Federal Regulations 1610.7‐2, and BLM Manual 1613 (1988a), the BLM must give priority to the designation and special management of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). The BLM Lander Field Office (LFO) is currently revising the 1987 Lander Resource Management Plan (RMP). The Approved Lander RMP will provide an updated comprehensive federal land use plan to guide the management of BLM lands within the Lander planning area. The Lander planning area is located in Fremont County, Wyoming (as shown in Map 1) and the BLM administers approximately 2.4 million acres of public surface land and 400,000 acres of federal mineral estate where the surface is owned by other entities. 3.0 Requirements for ACEC Designation A potential ACEC must meet two factors: the relevance and importance criteria defined in federal law and regulations, and requires a showing of special management. This Report explains the relevance and importance criteria for each proposed ACEC and identifies the need for special management attention. For those areas that did not satisfy the special management attention factor, this Report addresses management of those areas in the alternatives. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations
    WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Antelope, 2020 Deer and Elk Hunting Regulations Don't forget your conservation stamp Hunters and anglers must purchase a conservation stamp to hunt and fish in Wyoming. (See page 6) See page 18 for more information. wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS Access on Lands Enrolled in the Department’s Walk-in Areas Elk or Hunter Management Areas .................................................... 4 Hunt area map ............................................................................. 46 Access Yes Program .......................................................................... 4 Hunting seasons .......................................................................... 47 Age Restrictions ................................................................................. 4 Characteristics ............................................................................. 47 Antelope Special archery seasons.............................................................. 57 Hunt area map ..............................................................................12 Disabled hunter season extension.............................................. 57 Hunting seasons ...........................................................................13 Elk Special Management Permit ................................................. 57 Characteristics ..............................................................................13 Youth elk hunters........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Draft Regulation
    Chapter 5, Antelope Hunting Seasons At the time of this filing, the 2020 antelope harvest information is not yet available to the Department. Individual hunt area regular hunting season dates, special archery hunting season dates, hunt area limitations, license types and license quotas may be modified after harvest data has been evaluated. Any additional proposed changes to regular hunting season dates, special archery hunting season dates, hunt area limitations, numbers of limited quota licenses, license types, hunt area boundaries or modifications to other hunting provisions shall be made available for public comment on the Department website. An updated draft of 2021antelope hunting season proposals will also be posted to the Department website during the later portion of the public comment period. Section 4, edits have been proposed to further clarify antelope hunting season provisions for persons who qualify for and are in possession of hunting season extension permits. During the 2020 hunting season, special archery season information was repositioned within this regulation and caused some confusion among hunting season extension permit holders. The edited language in this Section is meant to clarify when a hunting season extension permit is valid. Please scroll down to view the regulation or click the down arrow for the next page. Draft 1-25-2021.2 CHAPTER 5 ANTELOPE HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703 and § 23-2-104. Section 2. Regular Hunting Seasons. Hunt areas, season dates and limitations. Special Archery Regular Hunt License Dates Season Dates Area Type Opens Closes Opens Closes Quota Limitations 1 1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • FCCWPP 2019 Update
    June 30, 2019 Fremont County, Wyoming This plan developed by the Fremont County CWPP Operating Group in cooperation with: Technical Forestry Services, LLC 6628 W Riverside Drive Casper, Wyoming 82604 www.wytfs.com This Page Left Intentionally Blank Fremont County 2019 CWPP Update Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.1 Public Outreach in Fremont County ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 Emergency Management Capabilities ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Wildland-Urban Interface .......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Other Values at-risk ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eden Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Farson F2 and F5 Laterals Salinity Control Project Sweetwater County, Wyoming
    Final Environmental Assessment Eden Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Farson F2 and F5 Laterals Salinity Control Project Sweetwater County, Wyoming PRO-EA-16-014 Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah July 2019 Mission Statements The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Final Environmental Assessment Eden Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Farson F2 and F5 Laterals Salinity Control Project Sweetwater County, Wyoming Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah Interdisciplinary Team Lead: Thomas Davidowicz Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, UT 84606 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah July 2019 I. Introduction In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), the Bureau of Reclamation - Provo Area Office (Reclamation) has conducted an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a Proposed Action to replace approximately 5.1 miles of unlined, open canal along the Farson F2 (including F2B and F2D) and F5 Laterals in the Eden Valley Irrigation and Drainage District (EVIDD) irrigation system with a high-density polyethylene pipeline. The Farson-Eden area is located in southwest Wyoming, approximately 40 miles north of Rock Springs, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
    Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 September 7, 2017 Draft Pre-Decisional Document - Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • LSWEETWATER Z^A,,, WILD and SCENIC RIVER STUDY REPORT S&Ws^D °QG4
    t File LSWEETWATER z^a,,, 1 WILD AND SCENIC 1 RIVER STUDY REPORT 1 1 l 1 U S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1 Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service 1 Mid-Continent Region 1 1 March 1978 ON MICROFILM PLEASE RE U iN Ta CENTER TECIHNNICAL tP-WWORMATIONIC C ws^ D °QG4 ENTER s& SERVICE NgIOALEPARK As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, pre- serving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under United States administration. Department of the Interior Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service Chris T. Delaporte, Director This report was prepared pursuant to Public Law 90-542, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Publication of the findings herein should not be construed as representing either the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior. This report provides information for further consideration by the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, the Secretary of the Interior, other Federal and State agencies, and the public. March 1978 t 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration in Action
    “I am honored to have helped to create the Forest Service Legacy Roads and Trails Program. I have watched the work across the nation, especially in the Skokomish Valley in the Sixth Congressional District. This work has helped restore watersheds and improve water quality and !sh habitat, and at the same time provided jobs that are desperately needed in our rural communities. This is a great program and one that I am proud to have sponsored. A lot more restoration work is needed, so I hope this program will continue to help the Forest Service get the job done.” — The Honorable Norm Dicks U.S. Representative for Washington’s 6th Congressional District, 1977 – 2012 We thank USDA Forest Service staff for their assistance in providing data and images, and Marlies Wierenga, Dave Heller, and Dan Funsch for their dedication, long hours, and hard work. Cover photo credits: Recontoured road on the Gallatin National Forest, MT, credit: Wildlands CPR; fisherperson, photo credit: Kent Miller. he Legacy Roads and Trails Remediation Program T(Legacy Roads and Trails) is a cornerstone of watershed restoration in our National Forests. Created to !x environmental problems resulting from the Forest Service’s extensive road and trail system, Legacy Roads and Trails has reduced stream pollution, restored !sh and wildlife habitat, created jobs, and improved essential roads to ensure safe access. Legacy Roads and Trails has been a success from the start; it is smartly and e"ciently managed, and achieves on-the-ground results in real time. Since its inception in 2008, Congress has appropriated $270 million to Legacy Roads and Trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Guide
    COLORfUL PAST \iYOMIN6 Since the 16th Century, a number of governments have claimed parts of what is now the State of Wyoming. The following national flags have. flown STUDE~ GUIDE over the Wyoming Territory: France, ~ Great Britain, Mexico, Spain, Texas and the United States. Wyoming officially became the 44th U.S. state in 1890. 'The name Wyoming was adopted from two Algonquin Indian words meaning "at the big plains" or "large prairie place." Gold in California and the lure of rich land in Oregon brought increasing numbers of pioneer wagon trains rolling over the Oregon Trail through Wyoming. Soldiers came to protect the wagon trains from Indians, and they also established forts along the trails. The most important of the western military posts was Fort Laramie in southeastern Wyoming. Fort Laramie became a haven for gold seekers and weary emigrants. It was also an important station for the Pony Express and the Overland Stagecoaches, and it served as a vital military post in the wars with the Plains Indians. Chief Washakie (WASH-ah-key) became known as the Indian Chief that helps white men. He '" assisted the U.S. military in their campaigns > against the Sioux and Cheyenne tribes. i:<.> ~ Washakie was chief of the Eastern Shoshones '" 1ij for sixty years and is the only Native American 1i5 OJ to have a military fort named after him. Chief <= E Washakie signed the treaty that established the 0 ~ boundaries of what is now the Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming. A graveyard in the town of Fort Washakie houses a substantial granite memorial with an inscription that reads: "Always loyal to the government and his white brothers." Chief Washakie Great herds of buffalo once grazed on the rolling hills of Wyoming, giving rise to one of the state's best known citizens, William F.
    [Show full text]
  • SOAR 2021 Wyoming State Parks, Historic
    Kite Festival at Hot Springs State Park SOAR 2021 Wyoming State Parks, Historic Black & Orange Cabins at Fort Bridger Sites & Trails Strategic Plan Kayaking at Curt Gowdy State Park CCC Castle at Guernsey State Park Broom Making at Wyoming Terrorial Prison Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................2 Executive Summary.................................................................................3 Mission and Vision Statement...............................................................5 Introduction..............................................................................................6 Information.Collection........................................................................6 Wyoming.Tourism.Industry.Master.Plan,.2010.–.2020...................6 Development.of.the.SOAR..................................................................7 Implementation.and.Tracking.Progress.Of..The.SOAR......................7 SPHST Overview and Statistics..............................................................8 Philosophy...........................................................................................8 Function...............................................................................................8 Organization/Staffing....................................................................... 10 Facilities............................................................................................ 11 History..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan for the Shoshone National Forest
    Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Shoshone National Forest Clocktower Creek and Wapiti Ridge, Washakie Wilderness Prepared by: /s/ Greg Bevenger __________________________________ Greg Bevenger, Air Program Manager Recommended by: /s/ Bryan Armel ______________________________________________ Bryan Armel, Resources Staff Officer Recommended by: /s/ Loren Poppert ______________________________________________ Loren Poppert, Recreation Staff Officer Approved by: /s/ Rebecca Aus ______________________________________________ Rebecca Aus, Forest Supervisor May 2010 Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Introduction Background As part of the USDA Forest Service effort to better understand and monitor wilderness areas, the agency has adopted the 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge (Forest Service 2005). The 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge was developed by the Chief’s Wilderness Advisory Group (WAG) as a quantifiable measurement of the Forest Service’s success in wilderness stewardship. The goal identified by the Wilderness Advisory Group, and endorsed by the Chief, is to bring each wilderness under Forest Service management to a minimum stewardship level by the year 2014, the fiftieth anniversary of the Wilderness Act. The Challenge was initiated in fiscal year 2005. The Challenge contains ten items that highlight elements of wilderness stewardship. These elements are 1) the natural role of fire, 2) invasive plants, 3) air quality, 4) education, 5) protection of recreational opportunities, 6) recreational site inventory, 7) outfitters
    [Show full text]
  • WYOMING NATIONAL FORESTS Wyomingites Value Their Public
    FACT WYOMING NATIONAL FORESTS SHEET VITAL TO PEOPLE, WILDLIFE AND THE ECONOMY THE NATIONAL FORESTS of Wyoming are a natural treasure highly valued by the state’s residents. ese public lands support an abundance of wildlife—including many imperiled species—protect pristine wilderness, supply critical drinking water and are integral to economic growth in the state, especially the booming recreation and tourism industries. Conserving national forests means protecting all of these important values. Habitat for Wildlife Wyoming national forests are home to a dazzling diver- The U.S. Forest Service manages more than 9 million sity of wildlife, including black bears, mountain lions, acres in Wyoming, including one national grassland (light orange on map) and 10 national forests (green on map), bobcats, martens, minks, swift foxes, elk, moose, big- fi ve within the state and fi ve that cross state lines. horn sheep, mule deer, white-tailed deer, pronghorn, bison, bats, pikas, prairie dogs, snowshoe hares, beavers, paddling, backcountry skiing, horseback riding, wildlife bald eagles, greater sage-grouse, sandhill cranes, cut- watching and other outdoor pursuits. throat trout and brook trout. Fitzpatrick Wilderness in the Shoshone National ese public lands also provide vital habitat for several Forest boasts 44 active glaciers, Gannett Peak—the species protected under the Endangered Species Act such highest point in Wyoming, 75 miles of streams and as the Canada lynx, grizzly bear, gray wolf, yellow-billed 60 lakes. Popo Agie Wilderness also in the Shoshone cuckoo, Kendall warm springs dace and Preble’s meadow National Forest protects 300 alpine and subalpine lakes. jumping mouse. Gros Ventre Wilderness in the Teton National Forest o ers 250 miles of trails and attracts hundreds of hunt- Wilderness for Conservation and Recreation ers in search of moose, elk and bighorn sheep annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming 2008-09 Mountain Lion Hunting Harvest Report
    MOUNTAIN LION Mountain Lion, Photo by LuRay Parker jjj TABLE I MOUNTAIN LION HUNTERS, HUNTER DAYS, HARVEST, DAYS PER HARVEST, AND HUNTER SUCCESS RATE HUNT SEASON: SEPTEMBER 1, 2008–MARCH 31, 2009 Hunter Days/ Hunter AREA Hunters Days Harvest Harvest Success 1. Black Hills Resident 133 1434 10 143.4 7.5% Nonresident 12 60 4 15.0 33.3% Total 145 1494 14 106.7 9.7% 2. Teton Resident 30 158 1 158.0 3.3% Nonresident 3 18 0 0.0 0.0% Total 33 176 1 176.0 3.0% 3. Bridger Resident 34 312 1 312.0 2.9% Nonresident 16 69 9 7.7 56.3% Total 50 381 10 38.1 20.0% 4. Popo Agie Resident 13 205 0 0.0 0.0% Nonresident* 0 0 1 0.0 - Total 13 205 1 205.0 7.7% 5. Iron Mountain Resident 59 402 1 402.0 1.7% Nonresident 2 14 0 0.0 0.0% Total 61 416 1 416.0 1.6% 6. Laramie Peak Resident 121 1149 10 114.9 8.3% Nonresident 3 17 0 0.0 0.0% Total 124 1166 10 116.6 8.1% 7. South Snowy Range Resident 66 507 7 72.4 10.6% Nonresident 6 14 5 2.8 83.3% Total 72 521 12 43.4 16.7% 8. Seminoe Resident 39 248 3 82.7 7.7% Nonresident 0 0 0 0.0 0.0% Total 39 248 3 82.7 7.7% 9. Sierra Madre Resident 29 196 1 196.0 3.4% Nonresident 1 10 0 0.0 0.0% Total 30 206 1 206.0 3.3% *NOTE: Number of hunters estimated from survey data is lower than actual harvest data provided by WY Game and Fish.
    [Show full text]