NOTICE OF A VINEYARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING June 23, 2021 – 6:00 PM ______

Public Notice is hereby given that the Vineyard Redevelopment Agency Board will hold a meeting on Wednesday, June 23, 2021, starting at approximately 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible following the City Council meeting in the City Council Chambers at 125 South Main Street, Vineyard, Utah. This meeting can also be viewed on our live stream webpage.

AGENDA

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. CONSENT AGENDA 2.1. Approval of the June 9, 2021 RDA Meeting Minutes

3. BUSINESS ITEMS 3.1. PUBLIC HEARING – Amending the Fiscal Year 2021-2021 RDA Budget City Manager Jacob McHargue will present amendments to the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 RDA budget. The RDA Board will act to approve (or deny) by resolution the amended Fiscal Year 2020-2021 RDA Budget.

3.2. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – Waterfront Planning and Design Consultant (5 minutes) Community Development Director Morgan Brim is recommending the RDA approve and sign a contract with FFKR and EDSA. The RDA Board will take appropriate action.

4. ADJOURNMENT

RDA meetings are scheduled as necessary.

The Public is invited to participate in all Vineyard Redevelopment Agency meetings. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the City Recorder at least 24 hours before the meeting by calling (801) 226-1929.

I the undersigned duly appointed City Recorder for Vineyard, Utah, hereby certify that the foregoing notice and agenda was emailed to the Salt Lake Tribune, posted at the Vineyard City offices, the Vineyard City website, the Utah Public Notice website, delivered electronically to city staff and to each member of the Governing Body.

AGENDA NOTICING COMPLETED ON: June 22, 2021

CERTIFIED (NOTICED) BY: /s/Pamela Spencer PAMELA SPENCER, CITY RECORDER Page 1 of 1; June 23, 2021 Vineyard Redevelopment Agency Agenda

1 2 3 MINUTES OF A VINEYARD REDEVELOPMENT 4 AGENCY BOARD MEETING 5 City Council Chambers 6 125 South Main Street, Vineyard Utah 87 June 9, 2021 at 8:11 PM 9 ______10 11 Present Absent 12 Chair Julie Fullmer 13 Boardmember John Earnest 14 Boardmember Tyce Flake 15 Boardmember Chris Judd 16 Boardmember Cristy Welsh 17 18 Staff Present: City Manager Jacob McHargue, Assistant Finance Director/Treasurer Mariah Hill, 19 Accountant Bayley Deason, City Attorney Jayme Blakesley, Assistant Public Works Director 20 Chris Wilson, City Engineer Naseem Ghandour, Sergeant Holden Rockwell with the Utah County 21 Sheriff’s Office, Community Development Director Morgan Brim, City Planner Briam Perez, 22 Water Manager Sullivan Love, City Recorder Pamela Spencer, Planning Commissioner Amber 23 Rasmussen 24 25 26 1. CALL TO ORDER 27 Chair Fullmer opened the meeting at 8:11 PM. 28 29 30 2. CONSENT AGENDA 31 2.1. Approval of the May 26, 2021 RDA Meeting Minutes 32 Chair Fullmer called for a motion. 33 34 Motion: BOARDMEMBER JUDD MOVED TO APPROVE CONSENT ITEM 2.1. 35 BOARDMEMBER FLAKE SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, 36 BOARDMEMBERS EARNEST, FLAKE, JUDD, AND WELSH VOTED AYE. THE MOTION 37 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 38 39 40 3. BUSINESS ITEMS 41 3.1 DISCUSSION AND ACTION – Final Fiscal Year 2021-2022 RDA Budget 42 Assistant Finance Director/Treasurer Mariah Hill will present the Final Fiscal Year 2021- 43 2022 RDA budget. The RDA Board will act to approve (or deny) by resolution the Final 44 Fiscal Year 2021-2022 RDA Budget. (A public hearing was held on the tentative budget 45 during the May 26, 2021 RDA meeting.) 46 47 Assistant Finance Director Mariah Hill explained that they had added to the budget a sewer master 48 plan line item and a staff engineer position to help with the town center to the budget. 49 Page 1 of 2; June 9, 2021 Vineyard Redevelopment Agency Minutes

50 Boardmember Flake asked for an update on the bond. City Manager Jacob McHargue explained 51 that the RDA had received a Triple B rating which was lower than expected. He said that they 52 were working through the bonding process. There was a discussion about how the credit rating 53 worked. 54 55 Motion: BOARDMEMBER JUDD MOVED TO ADOPT, BY RESOLUTION, THE 56 FISCAL YEAR 2022 RDA FINAL BUDGET AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. BOARDMEMBER 57 FLAKE SECONDED THE MOTION. ROLL CALL WENT AS FOLLOWS: CHAIR 58 FULLMER, BOARDMEMBERS EARNEST, FLAKE, JUDD, AND WELSH VOTED AYE. 59 THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 60 61 62 4. ADJOURNMENT 63 Chair Fullmer called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. 64 65 Motion: BOARDMEMBER FLAKE MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:16 66 PM. BOARDMEMBER EARNEST SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR FULLMER, 67 BOARDMEMBERS EARNEST, FLAKE, JUDD, AND WELSH VOTED AYE. THE MOTION 68 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 69 70 71 MINUTES APPROVED ON: 72 73 CERTIFIED CORRECT BY: /s/ Pamela Spencer 74 PAMELA SPENCER, CITY RECORDER

Page 2 of 2; June 9, 2021 Vineyard Redevelopment Agency Minutes

VINEYARD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Meeting Date: June 23, 2021 Agenda Item: 3.1 Budget Amendment Department: Finance Presenter: Jacob McHargue, City Manager

Background/Discussion: As staff prepares to finish out Fiscal Year 2020-2021, we have prepared adjustments to the budget to reflect one change – which is the adjustment to the amount transferred to the Internal Service Fund to appropriately cover expenditure increases. This change is reflected in the FY21 Final Budget Amendment worksheet.

Fiscal Impact: The increases the transfer from $38,100 to $42,100.

Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the FY2021 final budget adjustment as presented.

Sample Motion: I move to adopt the Fiscal Year 2021 Final Budget Amendment as presented by staff.

Attachments: Resolution and FY 2021 Final Budget Amendment worksheet

RESOLUTION NO. U-2021-03

A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VINEYARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) BUDGET FOR THE 2020-2021 FISCAL YEAR.

WHEREAS, Vineyard Redevelopment Agency has previously adopted a budget for the 2020-2021 fiscal year in accordance with the Utah Fiscal Procedures Act for cities; and

WHEREAS, the Vineyard Redevelopment Agency needs to now amend that adopted budget; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and was held on the 23rd of June 2021 on the proposed amendments to the 2020-2021 fiscal year budget for the Redevelopment Agency.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF VINEYARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS FOLLOWS:

1. The attached exhibit A hereby adopted as the amended 2020-2021 fiscal year budget for the Vineyard Redevelopment Agency.

2. This resolution shall take effect upon passing.

PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board of the Vineyard Redevelopment Agency this 23rd day of June 2021

______Chair Julie Fullmer

Attest:

______Executive Secretary

Vineyard City Budgeting Worksheet 25 Redvelopment Agency - 07/01/2020 to 06/09/2021 100.00% of the fiscal year has expired

2018 2019 2020 2020 2021 Original Revised Worksheet Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Budget Notes Change In Net Position Revenue: Taxes 3110 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 6,786,593 7,949,296 8,232,538 8,092,400 9,046,828 8,643,000 9,040,000 3113 PROPERTY TAX ADMIN 357,189 0 343,022 323,700 376,951 360,000 360,000 Total Taxes 7,143,782 7,949,296 8,575,560 8,416,100 9,423,779 9,003,000 9,400,000 Interest 3660 INTEREST INCOME 954,156 1,515,281 1,148,546 500,000 210,047 600,000 600,000 Total Interest 954,156 1,515,281 1,148,546 500,000 210,047 600,000 600,000 Miscellaneous revenue 3690 MISCELLENEOUS REVENUE 0 0 12,513 0 70,243 0 0 3820 BOND PROCEEDS 32,292,580 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Miscellaneous revenue 32,292,580 0 12,513 0 70,243 0 0 Contributions and transfers 3810 GRANT REVENUE 0 0 15,000 0 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 3815 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS 508,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 3960 EXCESS BEG. FUND APPROPRIATION 0 0 0 20,375,800 0 15,614,000 15,614,000 Total Contributions and transfers 508,248 0 15,000 20,375,800 0 18,614,000 18,614,000 Total Revenue: 40,898,766 9,464,577 9,751,619 29,291,900 9,704,069 28,217,000 28,614,000 Expenditures: Miscellaneous 5500 RDA Salaries & Wages 171,179 189,755 197,099 237,300 235,332 302,200 302,200 5510 Employee Benefits 37,805 41,874 44,402 68,100 63,867 68,800 68,800 5520 PUBLIC NOTICES 0 0 0 2,000 315 2,000 2,000 5531 PROF & TECH - GENERAL 72,256 70,217 81,353 27,600 55,963 27,600 27,600 5532 PROF & TECH - PLANNER 0 50,000 0 57,500 0 0 0 5533 PROF & TECH - ENGINEER 138,577 252,770 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 5534 PROF & TECH - FIN PLAN 33,150 15,800 24,125 30,000 6,250 30,000 30,000 5535 PROF & TECH - AUDITOR 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 5540 HOUSING FUND 255,728 129,435 0 0 0 0 0 5542 TIFF PAYMENTS 1,024,712 2,348,512 3,244,467 3,387,500 3,947,906 4,176,100 4,176,100 5561 MISCELLENEOUS EXPENSES 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 5600 Bond issuance costs 178,616 0 0 0 0 0 0 8010 DEBT PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 3,429,580 2,972,000 2,969,265 2,969,000 1,348,265 3,423,000 3,423,000 8020 DEBT INTEREST PAYMENT 1,258,540 1,504,731 1,421,806 1,426,700 863,042 1,343,700 1,343,700 9070 CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,294,885 7,193,892 12,407,241 20,800,000 5,556,593 18,701,200 19,094,500 Total Miscellaneous 10,899,028 14,773,036 20,393,758 29,009,700 12,081,533 28,178,600 28,571,900 Transfers 9515 TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 0 0 25,000 25,500 40,100 38,400 42,100 Total Transfers 0 0 25,000 25,500 40,100 38,400 42,100 Total Expenditures: 10,899,028 14,773,036 20,418,758 29,035,200 12,121,633 28,217,000 28,614,000 Total Change In Net Position 29,999,738 (5,308,459) (10,667,139) 256,700 (2,417,564) 0 0

INTENDED FOR MANAGEMENT USE ONLY Page 5 6/9/2021 04:08 PM

VINEYARD RDA STAFF REPORT

Meeting Date: June 23, 2021 Agenda Item: Waterfront Planning and Design Services Consultant Department: Community Development Presenter: Morgan Brim, Community Development Director

Background/Discussion: The city issued an RFP in May, 2021 for a consultant to complete a comprehensive design and plan for Vineyard’s 3.4-mile waterfront. During the planning process the consultant will work with the project steering committee to determine high priority projects to be funded through the $3,000,000 TRCC grant afforded the city earlier this year. The objective of the comprehensive plan of the entire waterfront will be to create a unique vision which represents the community’s desires of the waterfront, including Walkara Way to the south and the Vineyard Downtown positioned on the north. This plan will guide the city in applying for grants and in soliciting donations to implement waterfront projects.

Due to the diverse nature of Vineyard’s waterfront, this plan requires expertise in city planning, urban design, recreation/tourism planning and economic development. The city received eight submissions from qualified firms and interviewed five firms. After scoring these firms in various categories like economic development, experience in public participation, cost analysis and overall project costs, the interview panel recommends contracting with the consultant team of FFKR Architects and EDSA.

Fiscal Impact: The total concept plan for the waterfront is $241,121. Creating construction documents for high-priority projects will be determine once high-priority projects have been determined. The consultant’s response to the RFP is attached.

Recommendation: Staff recommends the RDA Board approve and enter into a contract with FFKR and EDSA.

Sample Motion: I move to approve Chair Fullmer to sign a contract with FFKR and EDSA for the Vineyard Waterfront planning and design services.

Attachments: FFKR and EDSA RFP proposal 14 June 2021

Mr. Morgan Brim Community Development Director, Vineyard City Vineyard, Utah 84059

Email: [email protected]

Re: Vineyard City Waterfront | Fee Proposal

Dear Mr. Brim,

FFKR x EDSA is pleased to offer you the following proposal for Waterfront Design Services to create the Conceptual Design of the Vineyard City Waterfront. We welcome the opportunity to collaborate with Vineyard City and are excited about our hand-picked consultant team that includes world renowned experts in the waterfront design industry. As outlined in the original project RFP, we understand that the project addresses the entirety of the Vineyard City waterfront and the projects developed must improve the ecological quality of the waterfront, improve public access, create economic development opportunities for adjacent land. With our extensive experience in public realm planning and design, we feel confident that we will provide the assistance needed to create a desirable destination with a unified sense of place.

Our team brings over 200 years combined of industry experience and collective wisdom. Our team is made up of local as well as global design leaders in the art and science of planning and landscape architecture, waterfront engineering and design, environmental remediation, and economic feasibility.

Our fee and proposed scope of work our based on our understanding of the project from the RFP and interview process. Our team offers the design acumen and expertise we feel will get the job done and done right. We have provided some details to help you understand the estimated efforts of each of our team members during the different phases of developing a Concept Design for the Waterfront areas. We recognize that budgets can be limited, and we are willing to work to right size our approach and scope to meet your needs.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Vineyard City Waterfront is separated into two planning areas: Waterfront South and Waterfront North and the scope of services will address both areas (See Attachment A: Scope Diagram). Our understanding of the needs for each area are as follows:

Waterfront South Projects - Improvements to the Walkara Way Beach and associated amenities - Trailhead and park area west of Clegg Farm - Improvements to the existing Center Street Trailhead - Restoration of beach areas and added waterfront access points - Revisioning of an existing stormwater outfall on the northside of Sunset Beach Park to establish a water feature attraction that is safe and usable.

Waterfront North Projects - Reuse of the former Geneva Mill detention pond - Economic development recommendations for future board walk area and Downtown land abutting waterfront - Transition considerations from promenade parks into the waterfront - Design of waterfront park and Vineyard Beach/expansion areas - Incorporation of lake front elements shown in the Vineyard Downtown Special Use District and Lake Front Improvement grant application

SCOPE OF WORK The following section describes in more detail the design process and deliverables we propose to complete the Concept Design stage of the planning and design work. Once the outcome of the Concept Design phase is finalized and priority projects have been identified, the FFKR x EDSA team will be able to provide a proposal for further design services. EDSA will lead the conceptual design effort in collaboration with FFKR, while FFKR will lead the community outreach efforts and provide local knowledge and assistance. In the subsequent phases of design documentation and implementation, FFKR will lead and coordinate our team’s efforts.

Stage 1 Concept Design

Future Stages: Stage 2 Schematic Design Stage 3 Design Development Stage 4 Construction Documents Stage 5 Construction Administration

FFKR x EDSA, along with our consultant team, will provide design services as detailed below including:

1. Concept Design Duration: ±12 to 16 weeks

During Concept Design, FFKR x EDSA will work with the City and Design Team to create and develop the concept designs for the projects. This stage will include development of the landscape design aesthetic for each of the project components and open spaces, to establish a cohesive and implementable landscape design that is consistent with the vision of the Master Plan and will be further developed in each subsequent phase.

To initiate the project, FFKR x EDSA will participate in a kick-off workshop and site visit to understand the site and parameters to develop the overall project. Following the kick-off meeting, FFKR x EDSA will establish the initial overall design direction for the project through sketch studies and options that consider the features and physical constraints of the project site.

In the Initial steps of Concept Design, FFKR x EDSA will develop design alternatives showing alternative approaches to the landscape architecture and aesthetic for the overall project areas. These will be in enough depth to evaluate and select a single direction or combination of elements for further development into a complete Concept Design.

The waterfront specific design elements and engineering will be led by Moffatt & Nichol (MN) and will focus on assembling the relevant environmental, wind, wave, climate, and physical data required for the design work. The results will be incorporated into the Concept Plan documents developed in subsequent tasks. Major topics may include: - Water Level - Winds - Waves - Currents - Bathymetry - Topography - Rainfall - Jurisdictional Limits - Navigational Boundaries - Environmentally sensitive areas - Geotechnical Information

MN will work with the City and design team to develop waterfronts concepts (~10% design) that could include elements such as: - Beaches - Wetlands - Marinas - Piers - Overlooks - Floating Structures - Dredging/Filing/Land Creation - Channels - Bridges

In addition, Moffat & Nichol will assist the City in researching available waterfront-related grants and identify potential opportunities to help bolster the available budget in order to create a bigger splash during the initial phase to help create excitement for future phases and generate revenue as quickly as possible to sustain the momentum.

Cost estimation and economic analysis will be provided in a parallel workflow to the project design effort. It is intended that the design information will be presented at each milestone and will require the estimation of all project/construction costs, which will include general conditions, bonds, insurances, fee’s design/construction contingencies and escalation. All soft/ project costs are excluded. The estimate will be prepared in a format to suit and where applicable will measure and quantify scope in order to provide detailed cost information. Where areas, details, systems and the like cannot be specifically identified, we shall provide details based upon historic and parametric data from our benchmarks of similar projects and developments.

Deliverables developed during the initial steps will be revised and elaborated for the Final Concept Design at the conclusion of this design stage. At the conclusion of this stage, FFKR x EDSA will present the Concept Design to Vineyard City authorities. Comments from the design presentation will be addressed and resubmitted, ready for the Schematic Design stage.

During the delivery of the design products and engagement with the City and residents, there are opportunities to provide deliverables beyond the standard quantity and detail for Concept Design. We have outlined Deliverables as Baseline and Enhanced should the City feel that these additional deliverables would be worthwhile in their efforts.

Baseline Deliverables 1. Draft Concept Design o (2) Concept Design alternatives where one will be selected as the preferred Concept Design direction o Design and Function Diagrams to illustrate key design principles o Design Character and Precedent Image Studies 2. Revised Concept Design o Preferred Overall Illustrative Conceptual Site Plan o Site Sections of key elements/relationships o Design and Function Diagrams to illustrate key design principles o Design Character and Precedent Image Studies o Landscape diagram and landscape materials palette o Hardscape diagram and hardscape materials palette o 3D study models of key elements/views o Area summary in support of Cost Managers o Commissioning of three (3) eye-level and one (1) CGI rendering 3. Program and Conceptual Economic Analysis o Updated Market Study / Analysis o Benchmark analysis of similar project(s) o Estimate project costs based upon cost per sf 4. Waterfront Engineering o CADD figures and presentation materials for workshops, meetings, and presentations o Concept-level quantities and costs o Grant strategy workshop o Evaluate quantities and develop concept-level cost estimates for the waterfront elements 5. Final Concept Design o Revised package to address any minor comments from the City presentation 6. Facilitation and Participation in three (3) meetings/workshops in Vineyard City during the Concept Design Phase o Kick off Meeting / Visioning Workshop [Vineyard City] o Draft Concept Community Engagement Session and Presentation [Vineyard City] o Revised Concept Presentation 7. Facilitation and Participation in up to two (2) Virtual Community Engagement Sessions 8. Facilitation and Participation in up to three (3) Pop-up/Mobile Outreach Engagement Sessions

Enhanced Deliverables 1. Draft Concept Design o (1) additional Concept alternative o 3D study models of key elements / views 2. Final Concept Design o Concept Grading Plans o Additional CGI renderings o 3D fly-through animation 3. Participation in additional meetings in Vineyard City (up to two)

Baseline Meetings - Kick off Meeting / Workshop [Vineyard City] - Design Coordination web meetings as required - Virtual Community Engagement Sessions (up to two) - Draft Concept Presentation and Community Engagement Session [Vineyard City] - Revised Concept Presentation [Vineyard City]

Enhanced Meetings - Additional Community Engagement Sessions (up to two) [Vineyard City]

At the conclusion of the Concept phase, the City and the Design Team will collaborate to identify the priority projects to continue into Construction Documents. At that point, our team will be able to provide our proposal and fee estimate to continue team through the remaining design stages.

Exclusions During the Concept Design phase FFKR x EDSA will endeavor to provide all necessary information needed to clearly describe the project vision and create a lasting concept that will set the overall project up for long term success. Understanding the importance that the concept design phase plays in the success of the overall project, we don’t want to prematurely exclude any work or deliverables that the Design Team or City feels will help achieve the vision. Upon selection, we will negotiate any exclusions or additional content beyond that which is described in this proposal.

SCHEDULING

a) Upon execution of this agreement, our team will work with you to finalize a project schedule and / or major milestones dates related to the project deliverables. The fee is based upon the assumption that each phase will commence promptly after the approval of the prior phase. In the event of delay between phases, whether due to a failure to receive the city’s approvals, governmental approvals or otherwise, the fee may be modified accordingly to account for such delay. b) Our team is prepared to commence preparation immediately upon approval of this proposal and receipt of the initial payment. c) Based on our current understanding of the project, we estimate the following schedule of FFKR x EDSA’s involvement within each project phase (excluding review and approval time):

Concept Design Phases Estimated Schedule 1. Concept Design i. Phase One: Project Kick-Off 2 to 4 weeks ii. Phase Two: Visioning and Engagement 8 weeks iii. Phase Three: Preferred Concept Refinement 4 weeks iv. Final Concept Design 2 weeks Total Estimated Schedule ±12 to 16 weeks

d) All timeframes are subject to the Client’s and Consultant’s cooperation in accordance with the provisions mentioned above.

FEE PROPOSAL

The above-described design work can be provided for the following fee, broken down by stage as follows:

Baseline Deliverables Concept Design Stage Fee

Phase One: Project Kick-Off/Analysis/Management $68,971 Phase Two: Visioning and Engagement $114,902 Phase Three: Preferred Concept Refinement $44.329 Final Concept Design $12.920 TOTAL $241,121 *Reimbursable Expenses (see below for details)

Enhanced Deliverables – estimated cost Concept Design Stage Fee

Additional Draft Concept $ 12,000 Modeling at Draft Concept Stage $ 12,000 Additional Renderings (each) $ 3,500 3D Flythrough Animation/Multimedia Presentation (per :30 seconds) $ 10,000 Additional Community Engagement Sessions (each) $ 5,000

Note: The above referenced fees are net of any and all taxes.

Reimbursable Expenses: a) Travel and lodging expenses in connection with the Project are in addition to the base fee above. Estimated expenses for travel and lodging are as follows using a figure of $1,000 per trip, per person for one, full day on site. The Design Team will only bill for reimbursement of actual costs incurred associated to travel:

Design Stage Estimated Expenses (Trips per Phase) Concept Design (2 people from EDSA; 1 person from MN) $9,000.00 (3 Trips / 3 People per Trip)

b) Costs of CGI renderings, photographs and models beyond those outlined in the above scope and deliverables. c) Expense of Professional Liability Insurance dedicated exclusively to the Project, or additional insurance coverage requested by the client. d) Costs of printing, reproduction, postage and delivery of drawings required for submission or coordination requested by client or consultants. e) Services of professional consultants, including engineers or specialists. Any costs for necessary external services to be approved by the client prior to moving forward. f) All fees associated with permits and/or plans processors (expeditors). g) Other Project-related expenditures approved in advance by the client. h) All reimbursable expenses will be billed to the client at cost.

Project Requirements Vineyard City will be responsible to provide the FFKR x EDSA design team with the required information during the detailed design process. The Design Team will rely on information and input from the City to include the following: a) Certified property survey(s) including boundary, topography, aerial photographs and existing conditions, and features. The Design Team will rely on the accuracy of this information. b) Site conditions including public utilities, geographic conditions, rights of way, restrictions, easements, deed restrictions, environmental impact reports, etc. c) Survey and site conditions data will be provided to the Design Team in electronic file format compatible with AutoCAD. d) The Client will provide the Design Team with all zoning and planning requirements and will be responsible for securing planning, zoning and environmental impact report approvals from all relevant government agencies. e) The Client will provide all necessary development program and budget information for the project.

Approval of Services/ Changes to Approved Services a) The Design Team will only proceed with a phase or design package after receiving the Client’s written approval of the services and deliverables provided in the previous. b) Revisions to drawings or other documents will be considered Additional Services when made necessary due to Client requested changes to previously approved drawings or due to Client changes to previously established budget and/or Program. c) If the Design Team is requested to provide additional submissions outbound of those listed in the provided Scope of Services, the Design Team will need to receive the request in writing. Changes to that portion of the Scope of Services will be billed at an hourly rate. d) Quantity and method of deliverables will be the decision of the Design Team provided they are sufficient to describe the design intent. e) Client’s decisions, approvals, reviews, and responses shall be communicated to the Design Team in a timely manner so as not to delay the performance of the Design Services. f) Payments are due upon Submission of the specific task being submitted as outlined above and are not contingent upon Government or Client approvals. g) In an effort to meet project timeframe, the Design Team will require written comments from the Client in advance of proceeding into the next stage of work. Comments must be coordinated and representative of all necessary entities of the Client team and will provide a clear direction for the next steps of design. h) The Design Team will revise the design packages if errors are caused by the fault of the Design Team. The efforts associated with these changes will be at no charge to the client. However, if through the fault of others or other program changes, the Design Team has to make changes to the design packages, then these changes would be deemed additional services and the Design Team will seek authorization from the Client, and an appropriate fee before completing the work.

Invoicing/Payment Schedule: a) Invoices for work complete will be submitted monthly. b) The Design Team will not begin work until the mobilization payment has been received and requires a two-week mobilization period. c) Payments are due and payable 30 days from the date of the invoice. Invoiced amounts unpaid 45 days after the invoice dote shall be deemed overdue and may result in a suspension of services. d) The Design Team will require payment/ payment confirmation in advance of proceeding into the next stage of work.

All of us as part of the FFKR x EDSA Design Team would like to thank you for the opportunity to work with Vineyard City team on such an exciting project. We look forward to forging a new relationship. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or if there are any modifications to this proposal.

Once mobilization is received, we will schedule the design team immediately. We welcome a call with you to initiate the project.

Best Regards,

J David Giles, AIA Susan Petheram, AICP [email protected] [email protected] 7

Attachment A: Scope Diagram

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 8 TEAM ORGANIZATION

J. DAVID GILES SUSAN PETHERAM ABRAM NIELSEN AIA AICP PLA, ASLA, AICP, LEED AP Executive Principal Project Manager and Planner & Landscape Architect Community Outreach Lead Main Point of Contact

KONA GRAY COURTNEY MOORE KATIE POPPEL FASLA, PLA PLA, ASLA, LEED AP ASLA Design Principal Lead Designer Planner & Landscape Architect

BRIAN NICHOLSON ROBERT SLOOP BRIAN VANNEMAN MS PE Real Estate Wetland Planning & Waterfront Planner & Development Permitting Specialist Engineer Strategist

JERRY HOLCOMB SAM BROOKHAM PE Real Estate Market Waterfront Designer and GIS Analyst & Engineer LUCAS STOVER Associate Director

MATT HIGHLAND Senior Estimator

Vineyard | Waterfront Project SCOPE OF WORK

CONCEPT DE- FFKR EDSA MN (Mof- Leland M&N Cummings Civil Task SubTotal SIGN fat&Nichol) Phase 1: Project $13,200 $8,320 $32,573 $5,120 $4,608 $1,650 $3,500 $68,971 Kick Off & Man- agement Phase 2: Vision- $31,480 $46,840 $26,952 $4,720 $2,560 $1,650 $700 $114,902 ing & Engage- ment Phase 3: Con- $13,100 $15,000 $1,068 $5,800 $2,560 $3,300 $3,500 $44,328 cept Refine- ment & Focus Phase 4: Final- $4,920 $8,000 $12,920 Concept Plan Firm SubTotal: $62,700 $78,160 $60,593 $15,640 $9,728 $6,600 $7,700 $241,121 10 SUSIE PETHERAM ABRAM NIELSEN AICP PLA, AICP, ASLA, LEED AP

ROLE: PROJECT MANAGER AND ROLE: PLANNER + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OUTREACH LEAD With 19 years of experience as a planner and project Abe has master planned communities all over the world manager in Utah, Susie brings a depth of knowledge and is a Senior Associate at FFKR. His passion for planning working with communities and agencies where multiple vibrant communities is evident in his portfolio of great stakeholders are involved in the planning process. Her projects. Abe is known for his acumen in managing community engagement skills are geared toward listening complex projects and for his ability to keep multiple to and processing multiple viewpoints and translating them team members on the same page to meet budget and into common themes. She infuses creativity into involving schedule deadlines. the community on projects and weaves a combination of platforms and opportunities together for a comprehensive RELEVANT EXPERIENCE outreach strategy. Susie has been involved in several  Provo Downtown Redevelopment Study, Provo, Utah large environmental planning projects, including the  Monument Park, Lehi, Utah Jordan River CMP, Bear River CMP, and Green/Colorado River CMPs and has loved working on open space and  Layton TOD Study, Layton, Utah recreation plans that balance public and private  Wavetronix Corporate Campus, Springville, UT interests. Her skills at developing visionary, innovative  BYU-Idaho College Ave. Mixed-Use Master Plan, plans help communities develop policies and implement Rexburg, ID projects that reflect their unique character and needs.  Fallon Shoshone-Paiute Community Master Plan, Fallon, NV COMMUNITY OUTREACH EXPERIENCE  Thanksgiving Point Master Plan, Lehi, UT  Herriman City General Plan, Herriman, UT  Alabama-Coushatta Master Plan, Livingston, TX  South Ogden City General Plan, South Ogden, UT  Orem City Center Planned Development Code, Orem, UT*  North Ogden Downtown Form-Based Code, North Ogden, PREVIOUS WORK AT EDSA UT*  Opera House Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates*  Farmington Transit Oriented Development Ordinance &  Biscayne Landing, North Miami, FL* Regulating Plan, Farmington, UT* *work completed prior to joining FFKR Architects  Sugar House Business District Design Guidelines and Small Area Plan, Salt Lake City, UT* EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE  Daybreak Commercial Design Guidelines, South Jordan, Utah State University, 20 per week UT* Bachelors of Landscape Architecture and  Wasatch Front Transit Oriented Development Design Environmental Planning Guidelines, Envision UT* LICENSES & *work completed prior to joining FFKR Architects REGISTRATIONS Licensed Landscape EDUCATION LICENSES & Architect – Utah University of Utah, Ph.D. REGISTRATIONS Candidate in Metropolitan American Institute of AICP Certified Planning, Policy, and Design Certified Planners, 2010, CLARB Certified AICP #024247 University of Utah, Master LEED® Accredited, US of City and Metropolitan HOURS AVAILABLE Green Building Council Planning 25 per week

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 11 KONA GRAY COURTNEY MOORE FASLA, PLA PLA, ASLA, LEED AP

ROLE: DESIGN PRINCIPAL / EDSA ROLE: LEAD DESIGNER / EDSA

Strong leadership and a sense of purpose are part of Combining environmental stewardship and social Kona’s DNA. Having practiced in 30+ countries, his global responsibility with a design philosophy that focuses on management sense has positively shaped the outcomes elegance and simplicity, Courtney achieves timeless of many award-winning assignments. He successfully quality with every project he undertakes. With an integrates creativity and regional resources into imaginative and perceptive talent, his built works have functional environments that invigorate the energy, economic viability and a design aesthetic that imagination. With an uncompromising dedication to reflects his sense for visual boundaries, function and form. quality, Kona creates welcoming public places that bring a His appreciation for how the environment meets the strong sense of vitality back to neighborhoods. Blending needs of diverse populations leads to innovative sensitivity with innovative design solutions, he unites a designs solutions that transform communities and client’s vision with his own vanguard designs to produce habitats into better places. In practice, Courtney has programs with purpose and presence. worked with a broad, complex range of clients on a global level inciting emotion and driving project development. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Cairo Central Park, Cairo, Egypt RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Turks and Caicos National Physical Development Plan  Wuhan East Lake Greenway (TCI NPDP)  New Bund Sports Park, Shanghai, China  Wildflower and Silver Palm Park  Vinhomes Central Park, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam  Savannah historic Downtown Streetscapes  Water Street of Wujiang, Suzhou, China  Gainesville CRA Master Plan  Mohammed Bin Zayed City Public Realm, Abu Dhabi,  Baha Mar Resort, Nassau, Bahamas United Arab Emirates

EDUCATION REGISTRATIONS EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE University of Georgia, School Landscape Architect (FL) North Carolina State 20 per week of Environment and Design, #6666950; (GA) #001789; University, Bachelor of Bachelor of Landscape (VA) #406001878; (AR), Landscape Architecture, Architecture, 1997 #9215 2002 CLARB Certified #43648 REGISTRATIONS HOURS AVAILABLE Landscape Architect 5 per week (Florida) #6666909

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 12 KATIE POPPEL BRIAN NICHOLSON ASLA MS

ROLE: PLANNER & LANDSCAPE ROLE: WETLAND SPECIALIST / M&N ARCHITECT / EDSA ENVIRONMENTAL Having worked on a wide range of domestic and For over 20 years Mr. Nicholson has worked in the natural international projects, Katie focuses on multifunctional and built environment, assisting communities in public spaces that bring about economic development to implementing projects that engage people with their local benefit people, their health and wellbeing and the ecosystems. He is very familiar with the conditions in ecosystems that surround them. Her systematic and around Utah Lake having conducted a shoreline approach focuses on the holistic design of urban public wetland and cultural resource assessment for spaces, while providing opportunities for sustainability Saratoga Springs. He is currently completing a and innovation. As a talented designer and ardent management plan for the Utah Lake Wetland Preserve. As photographer, Katie’s human-centric approach brings a wetland ecologist he regularly integrates soil, sensibility and meaning to a place. vegetation, and hydrology into restoration design. He will ensure that aquatic resource restoration projects are RELEVANT EXPERIENCE designed within permittable Clean Water Act guidelines.  Cairo Central Park, Cairo, Egypt AQUATIC RESOURCE EXPERIENCE  Turks and Caicos National Physical Development Plan (TCI NPDP)  Utah Lake Wetland Preserve Management Plan, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission /  Las Olas Corridor Improvements, Fort Lauderdale, Division of Wildlife Resources Florida  Assessment of Potential Costs of Declining Water Levels  Fort Lauderdale Beach Streetscape Improve, Fort of Great Salt Lake, Great Salt Lake Advisory Council Lauderdale, Florida  Lakeview Parkway Wetland Permitting and Mitigation,  Oasis West, Cairo, Egypt Provo City  Shoreline Wetland and Cultural Resource Inventory and Assessment, City of Saratoga Springs*  Jordan River Riparian Restoration, Salt Lake City Corporation*  Jordan River Comprehensive Management Plan, Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands*  Utah Lake Water Quality / Community Engagement White Paper, Utah Division of Water Quality* *work completed prior to joining M&N Environmental EDUCATION AFFILIATIONS University of Washington, American Society of EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE Master of Landscape Landscape Architects, Graduate Certificate. 10 per week Architecture and Master of Member Conflict Resolution, Urban Design and Planning, American Planning University of Utah 2018 Association, Member M.S. Watershed Science, American Institute of Utah State University, 2000 Planners, Candidate B.A. Environmental Studies, HOURS AVAILABLE Middlebury College, 1991 35 per week

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 13 ROBERT SLOOP, PE JERRY HOLCOMB, PE

ROLE: WATERFRONT PLANNER & ROLE: WATERFRONT DESIGNER & ENGINEER / MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEER / MOFFATT & NICHOL Mr. Sloop leads the planning, permitting, design, and Mr. Holcomb brings nearly 15 years of waterfront project engineering teams that create ideas and deliver projects design experience and a specialized expertise in for the places along the shoreline that attract people. Mr. structural engineering and marine construction. Key roles Sloop brings expert-level knowledge in Coastal, include master plan analyses, feasibility studies, financial Environmental, Ecosystems, and Waterfront design. His market analyses, value engineering, capital improvement present focus is on applying these skills to increase reports, developing project submittal documents, grant the resiliency of waterfront projects with creative and writing and funding sourcing, stakeholder and public practical solutions using the best of today’s science, outreach, regulatory and local agency project permitting, while considering future variability and the time value and construction management. His grant funding of investment dollars. He is presently leading efforts for experience which has resulted in securing more than three of the largest Urban Waterfront revivals in the US. $10M in grant funding for various marine facilities across the US through federal, state, and local RELEVANT EXPERIENCE government grant programs.  District Wharf, Washington DC  Cardiff Beach Living Shoreline, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Redondo Beach Sportfishing Pier Replacement, CA  San Pedro Bay Ecological Restoration, Long Beach, CA  Dana Point Harbor Boat Ramp, CA  Seaport, San Diego, CA  Wilmington Waterfront Promenade, LA, CA  Port Covington, Baltimore  Marina Park Harbor Development, Newport CA  AltaSea Facility, Port of Los Angeles  Ocean Institute Waterfront Rehabilitation, CA  Middle Branch Master Plan, Baltimore  Seaport San Diego, CA  79th Street Boat Basin, Manhattan  The Wharf, Washington DC  Cabrillo Way Marina, Los Angeles  Riverpoint, Washington DC

EDUCATION REGISTRATION EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE M.E., Coastal and Professional Engineer: BS, Civil Engineering with 15 per week Oceanographic Engineering, California, Florida, Structural Emphasis, University of Florida, 1995 California State Polytechnic HOURS AVAILABLE B.S., Mechanical University, Pomona, 2008 10 per week Engineering, University of REGISTRATION South Florida, California, Civil, C80027, 2012 Minor Degrees in Philosophy, Environmental Engineering, and Marine Biology

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 14 BRIAN VANNEMAN SAM BROOKHAM

ROLE: REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ROLE: REAL ESTATE MARKET AND GIS STRATEGIST / LELAND ANALYST / LELAND Brian Vanneman is a real estate development advisor and Sam Brookham is an innovative and technically astute urban planner who works with public agencies and private urban planner, real estate strategist, and project manager developers to create great urban places. Brian’s passion is with a passion for sustainability. Sam is dedicated to for mixed-use destinations that blend adaptive reuse with helping small-to-mid-size cities become and remain ground-up development, missing middle housing economically vibrant. He believes in taking a holistic and communities, and transit-oriented development—places equitable approach to planning and development by where people can meet, work, recreate, and thrive. In pursuing vision-driven economic objectives that are support of these and other projects, Brian assists public based on tailored, quantitative, market-based analysis agencies and private developers to envision new uses and targeted engagement. for underutilized property, conduct market and financial analysis, build partnerships among diverse parties, and REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE take action that makes better places possible.  Port of Camas-Washougal Waterfront Development Advisory Services, Washougal, WA REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE  Transit-Oriented Development Study, Ogden, UT  Port of Camas-Washougal Waterfront Development  Riverfront Master Plan, Newberg, OR Advisory Services, Washougal, WA  Commercial Centers Master Planning, Taylorsville, UT  Town Center and East Bay Shopping Center Redevelopment, Provo, UT  Waterfront Area-Wide Plan, Cosmopolis, WA  Waterfront Master Plan and Development Strategy, Port  Redwood Road Corridor Study, Salt Lake City to South of Vancouver, WA Jordan, UT  Beach Boulevard Property Redevelopment Strategy,  Rail Yards Development Options, Albuquerque, NM Pacifica, CA  City Center Station Area Plan, West Jordan, UT  Riverfront Master Plan and Preliminary Development  Port of Pasco Waterfront Strategic Development Strategy, Eugene, OR Advisory Services, Pasco, WA  City Center Station Area Plan, West Jordan, UT  Town Center and East Bay Shopping Center  Port of Pasco Waterfront Strategic Development Advisory Redevelopment, Provo, UT Services, Pasco, WA  Town Center Development Strategy and Regional  Riverfront Master Plan, Newberg, OR Growth Area Plan, University Place, WA  Redwood Road Corridor Study, Salt Lake City to South  Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update, Aberdeen, WA Jordan, UT

EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL Master of Urban and MEMBERSHIPS Bachelor of Science, MEMBERSHIPS Regional Planning, Urban Land Institute (ULI) Urban Planning, University American Planning Graduate Certificate of and ULI NEXT of Utah; Bachelor of Association Real Estate Development, Science, Environmental Urbanism Next, National Portland State University; and Sustainability Studies, HOURS AVAILABLE Conference Steering Bachelor of Arts, History University of Utah 20 per week Committee and Journalism, University of Oregon, Clark Honors The Street Trust, Portland, College Oregon

HOURS AVAILABLE 12 per week Vineyard | Waterfront Project 15 LUCAS STOVER MATT HIGHLAND

ROLE: ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR / CUMMING ROLE: SENIOR ESTIMATOR / CUMMING

Lucas’ background knowledge in Civil Engineering Matt is an experienced estimator with international provides him with the skills necessary to prepare experience on all sectors, with a specific focus on estimates at various design stages. As Associate Director residential commercial, industrial, and mixed-use his responsibilities include quantity take-offs, developments. Since joining Cumming, he has provided a specification review, obtaining price quotes, change order full suite of estimating services to our clients nationally, estimating, and coordinating and incorporating estimates including high-profile projects in the Midwest. As a Senior from various project trades and construction phases. He Cost Manager, Matt works closely with our estimating also assists in bid analysis and change order review. Lucas has extensive mixed-use and commercial development team to provide clients procurement advice, QA services experience, including ground-up development, and value engineering, making sure that all divisions are renovations, Tis, and core-and-shell projects. represented within estimates.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Bay Street Commercial Bldg., Proposed TI for  Colorado Parks & Wildlife, Staunton State Park Phase III Restaurant/Distillery w-Office-Retail-Event Space, San Development incl. Roadways-Campground-Picnic Francisco, CA Area-Trails-Power, Pine, CO  Confidential Client, New Mixed-Use Development Phase  Environmental Learning for Kids (ELK) Education Center, 3 Amenity Bldg.-Conference Center, Menlo Park, CA Denver, CO  First & Mission Towers, MEP Estimates for New Office-  Redrocks Upper South Lot Access, Morrison, CO Residential-Hotel Buildings, San Francisco, CA  Riverdale Regional Park Arena, Denver, CO  Mission Rock Development, New Mixed-Use Dev.-  Town of Winter Park, Public Transit Operations Facility, Commercial-Residential-Retail, San Francisco, CA Winter Park, CO  Oyster Point, Infrastructure for New Mixed-Use  City of Fort Collins, Transfort Charging Station, Fort Development with Life Science R&D Offices-Hotel- Collins, CO Retail-Park-Marina, So. San Francisco, CA  City of Fort Collins Park, Trail Head Arch, Fort Collins, CO  The Globe, New Themed Retail & Entertainment Lifestyle  Lompoc Maintenance Facility, Lompoc, CA Center, Fremont, CA  Denver Center for Performing Arts, Buell Theater,  The Hills at Vallco, New Mixed-Use Development, Denver, CO Cupertino, CA  Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority North  Lompoc Maintenance Facility, Lompoc, CA Building Study, Chicago, IL  Vallco Town Center, New Mixed-Use Development-  RidgeGate Campus, New Commercial Buildings & Residential-Office-Retail, Cupertino, CA Parking Garage, Lone Tree, CO  Westfi eld Valley Fair Mall, Expansion & Renovation,  Confidential Corporate Client, Pearl Place Building C Santa Clara, CA Renovation for Relocation Project, Boulder, CO

EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE EDUCATION HOURS AVAILABLE Bachelor of Science, Civil 10 per week Bachelor of Construction 10 per week Engineering, California Management Building Polytechnic State University, (Hons.), University of San Luis Obispo Newcastle, Australia

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 16 REFERENCES

The team we are proposing has significant experience with community engagement, cost estimating, economic analysis, and designing for waterfront projects. We are including references for the both our project manager and team members who will manage efforts for each service provided.

FFKR ARCHITECTS

HERRIMAN CITY

Michael Maloy, City Planner for Herriman City 801-285-9717, [email protected]

Susie Petheram lead the General Plan efforts and coordinated more than 20 community engagement opportunities using a combination of platforms and strategies. The goal was to have the engagement be inclusive and provide a wide range of ways for the community to be informed and involved. This meant we went TO the community at many of the city’s events as well as hosting project-specific workshops. Michael Maloy can speak to the extent and success of the outreach efforts.

EDSA

CITY OF BOCA RATON

Jennifer Bistyga, E.I., MBA, Coastal Program Manager 561-212-5198, [email protected]

Jennifer is the City’s project manager responsible for overseeing the planning efforts for the Boca Raton Waterfront Master Plan which led to the design of a destination park on the Intracoastal Waterway. It was EDSA’s collaborative engagement approach with an active Community that facilitated the priority project. Jennifer can attest to the successful EDSA outreach and inclusive design process that is being realized in construction now.

EDSA

CITY OF DELRAY BEACH

Missie Barletto, Assistant Public Works Director [email protected]

Missie was involved throughout the duration of the design and construction of the project, serving in several different capacities at the City. She can elaborate on EDSA’s impact to the design creativity, public outreach, and implementation efforts of the revitalization of the City’s signature recreational asset.

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 17 REFERENCES

LELAND CONSULTING

PORT OF CAMAS-WASHOUGAL

David Ripp Chief Executive Officer, Port of Camas-Washougal 360-835-2196 [email protected]

Brian Vanneman is the Project Manager and Senior Strategic Development Advisor an d Lead Market and Financial Analyst with Sam Brookham for Land Use Forecasting and Market Analyst. David Ripp can speak to the success of the market analysis, soliciting input from developers and community, site planning, and implementation.

M&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

UTAH LAKE WETLAND PRESERVE

David Lee Central Utah Project Leader, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources 801-243-4103 [email protected]

David Lee is the Manager of the Utah Lake Wetland Preserve and employee of the Division of Wildlife Resources. Mr. Lee can speak to environmental conditions in and around Utah Lake, public use of the Preserve, and Brian’s involvement in the natural area planning in the midst of growing communities.

COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN THE TIME OF COVID-19 Our team has been implementing and refining digital other techniques of reaching people remotely. We tools and facilitation techniques for remote share project information online utilizing a variety of collaboration with client teams and committees and is platforms and multiple methods for interaction and well prepared to launch the project effectively without collection of information and perspective. Examples of the need for in-person meetings or in-person virtual tools that are effective include: engagement events. • Surveys, including visual preference surveys, using We hold on to hope that in later project phases best Survey 123 and Survey Monkey practices for using civic gatherings and in-person • Webcast Town Hall meetings and Open Houses using listening sessions as described in the scope of work Zoom, video creation, ArcGIS Storymaps, Menti, MIRO will be feasible. However, if this situation continues • Mapping input using ArcGIS Hub and interactive PDF throughout the project, we are very confident we can documents adapt the project scope using

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 18 HERRIMAN CITY GENERAL PLAN Herriman, Utah

Herriman NEXT: Planning our Future

SOUTH JORDAN

11800 south Future Land Use Analysis

Residential

12600 south Mixed Use/Commercial

Towne Center

RIVERTON Business Park/Industrial

13400 south Parks

HERRIMAN Open Space

Current City Boundary

City Streets & Highways

mountain view hwy BLUFFDALE

redwood road

LEVERAGING GROWTH INTO OPPORTUNITIES WEBSITE FFKR is working with Herriman City to update their General Plan. As a fast- https://www.herriman.org/general- growing community on the southwest corner of Salt Lake County, Herriman has plan been leveraging regional growth into local opportunities while also feeling TEAM MEMBERS AND ROLE burdened with its impacts. To help the community understand the impacts Susie Petheram, Project Manager and related to alternative scenarios for undeveloped land within city boundaries as Senior Planner well as areas adjacent, FFKR has utilized the Urban Footprint scenario software. CONTACT Knowing that Herriman, like many cities, is a community with a diverse range of Michael Maloy views, FFKR has utilized a range of outreach platforms. City Planner for Herriman City 801-285-9717 By having a table at several different community events throughout the year, we COST ESTIMATE have heard from many voices. Conducting “pop-up” events at local stores and $100,000 activity centers were successful in getting a range of opinions on controversial issues like housing density and mixed use. CONSTRUCTION COST N/A A key component of the process has been educating the community on the role FFKR ARCHITECTS SERVICES of master development agreements and helping them understand which areas Public Outreach and Engagement, of the city are not yet built, but already planned out. Land Use Policy, Visioning,Scenario Planning, Graphics and Mapping

DESIGN START 2019

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 19 POMPANO BEACH Pompano Beach, Florida

Due to the public nature and high visibility of this project, promoting community WEBSITE engagement and building consensus during the earliest stages was imperative https://www.edsaplan.com/ in guiding the framework for this plan. The collaborative and inclusionary project/pompano-beach- process bolstered public support and proved successful in the procurement of boulevard-streetscape-and-dune- additional funds to benefit its implementation. Primary design elements include enhancements/ a signature plaza with interactive water feature, roadway and parking improvements, an extensive beach promenade, multi-purpose kiosk building, TEAM MEMBERS AND ROLE Betsy Suiter, Shannon Kenyon and state of the art playground. Critical to the restorative nature of the project was the reestablishment of the deteriorated dune system through native CONTACT plantings, protective barriers, and controlled beach access. Greg Harrison, City Manager City of Ponpano Beach Working with the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), 954-786-4601 EDSA led a multidisciplinary team of consultants, in creating a plan for the COST ESTIMATE beach environment and existing streetscape along Pompano Beach Boulevard. $9 million Today, the Pompano Beach Streetscape has garnered regional and local CONSTRUCTION COST acclaim for its promenade, public plaza, and restored dunes. $9 million

EDSA SERVICES Detailed Design and Construction Services

DESIGN START 2010

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 20

Pompano Beach Pompano Beach, Florida

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 21 WILDFLOWER AND SILVER PALM PARK Boca Raton, Florida

This collaborative investment between the residents and city of Boca Raton WEBSITE celebrates the local water bodies and connective vessels that link the inner city https://www.myboca.us/1773/ to the beachfront. Promoting safe and equitable waterside activity, the design Wildflower-Silver-Palm-Park-Site levels grade changes and eliminates barriers between two pre-existing park spaces for seamless transition and circulation. Oriented for unobstructed views TEAM MEMBERS AND ROLE Kona Gray, Bob Dugan, Jeff Suiter of the Intercoastal waterway, pedestrian traffic is cycled through the active Wildflower Park through the passive Silver Palm Park, home to the city’s only CONTACT boating ramps. Underscoring modern downtown structures, terraced steps, Jennifer Bistyga, E.I., MBA event promenades and picnic pavilions are fashioned with neutral palettes and Coastal Program Manager 561-212-5198 preserved vegetation, while an interactive family-friendly zone decked with splash pads, fitness equipment and pockets of green spaces create a series of COST ESTIMATE unprecedented gathering spaces for play, relaxation and public engagement. $10.3 million

EDSA’s focus on both protecting the natural environment and honoring the local CONSTRUCTION COST Under Construction culture influenced a new generation of attraction that not only conserves the delicate sea wall but prepares it for a high-style reintroduction to the South EDSA SERVICES Florida coastal community. Detailed Design and Construction Services

DESIGN START 2021

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 22

Wildflower and Silver Palm Park Boca Raton, Florida

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 23 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY SERVICES Washougal, Washington

Image credit: YBA Architects

LCG was engaged by the Port of Camas-Washougal in early 2019 to assist with WEBSITE development of the Port’s 26-acre waterfront property. The Port’s vision is for a http://parkerslandingwaterfront.com/ gathering place and regional destination, where employment, restaurants and retail, and housing are combined with public open spaces, parks, beach and TEAM MEMBERS AND ROLE Brian Vanneman, Project Manager, boat access to the Columbia River, and regular community events. As the Port’s waterfront development owner’s representative, the LCG team has helped the Sam Brookham, Land Use Forecasting and Market Analyst Port to market the site to potential developers; releases a developer Request for Qualifications (RFQ); evaluate various aspects of the site including zoning, CONTACT environmental conditions, and the local and regional real estate market; David Ripp Chief Executive Officer interview developers and discuss preliminary development deal terms; and 360-835-2196 select RKM Development as the Port’s waterfront master developer. In May 2019, LCG worked with the Port to negotiate and sign an Exclusive Negotiating COST ESTIMATE Agreement (ENA) between the Port and RKm, which spells out the actions that $220,417 (LCG budget including subcontractors) both parties will take including site planning and financial analysis. LCG continues to work with the Port during 2021 as the parties work towards CONSTRUCTION COST groundbreaking and development, planned for 2022. N/A LELAND SERVICES Market analysis, demographic analysis, due diligence for site development, soliciting input and interest, site planning, implementation and development, and project management

DESIGN START 2019

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 24 WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Vancouver, Washington

Image credit: NBBJ

LCG was engaged by the Port of Vancouver USA to guide the market and WEBSITE financial analysis, economic and fiscal impact analysis, and development http://www.discoverterminal1.com/ strategy for its 12-acre property on the Columbia River adjacent to downtown Vancouver. The work began and with market and financial analysis, site TEAM MEMBERS AND ROLE Brian Vanneman, Project Manager, planning, conceptual building design, cost estimation, and due diligence with Market and Financial Analyst, and Real office and hotel development being the lead land uses. Following the Port’s Estate Strategist and Development internal adoption of a Waterfront Master preparation of two developer RFQs and Advisor worked with the Port of select two preferred development partners: Vesta CONTACT Hospitality, office, retail, and housing. LCG continued to work with the port on Jack Flug ground lease negotiations for the hotel project, and a lease assisted with the Senior Financial Analyst, Port of recruitment of a new waterfront restaurant, Warehouse 23, and other elements Vancouver USA of the project including waterfront trails, plazas, and other features of the site. 360-816-9856 COST ESTIMATE $472,453 (LCG budget including subcontractors)

CONSTRUCTION COST N/A

LELAND SERVICES Market analysis for office, hotel, multifamily, and other uses; pro forma financial analysis; supervision of site and building plans; project management of multidisciplinary team

DESIGN START 2014

Vineyard | Waterfront Project 25 HOURLY RATE & SERVICE STRUCTURE

FFKR Architects – Architect of Record and EDSA – Lead Master Planner and Designers Community Engagement Lead

Dave Giles $220 Kona Gray $300 Executive Principal Design Principal Susan Petheram $140 Courtney Moore $300 Lead Planner & Community Engagement Principal-in-Charge Abram Nielsen $140 Katie Poppel $110 Co-Master Planner Planner and Landscape Architect

M&N Environmental – wetland planning, restoration, Moffatt + Nichol – in lake, lake bed, and lake shoreline enhancement, and permitting enhancement or restoration

Brian Nicholson $128 Robert Sloop $267 Wetland Specialist Waterfront Planner and Engineer Jerry Holcomb $250 Waterfront Designer and Engineer

Leland Consulting – Economic Analysis Cummings – Cost Management

Brian Vanneman $200 Lucas Stover $180 Principal Associate Director Sam Brookham $140 Matt Highland $150 Associate Senior Estimator LCG bills in quarter-hour (0.25) increments. Expenses are charged at cost plus 10%.

 Reimbursable expenses such as printing, reproduction, and shipping are in addition to the described fees and billed at a multiple of 1.1 times actual expense.  Consultants and Additional Services that are not described in the scope of work may be provided after the execution of this agreement and are subject to standard hourly billing rates.  Payments due within thirty (30) days of invoice date.

Vineyard | Waterfront Project