Curt Jacob Stern (1902-1981) [1]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Curt Jacob Stern (1902-1981) [1] Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Curt Jacob Stern (1902-1981) [1] By: Garcia, Dasia Keywords: Genetics [2] Curt Jacob Stern studied radiation [3] and chromosomes in humans [4] and fruit flies in the United States during the twentieth century. He researched the mechanisms of inheritance and of mitosis [5], or the process in which the chromosomes in the nucleus [6] of a single cell, called the parent cell, split into identical sets and yield two cells, called daughter cells. Stern worked on the Drosophila melanogaster [7] fruit fly, and he provided early evidence that chromosomes exchange genetic material during cellular reproduction. During World War II, he provided evidence for the harmful effects of radiation [3] on developing organisms. That research showed that mutations can cause problems in developing fetuses and can lead to cancer. He helped explain how genetic material transmits from parent to progeny, and how it functions in developing organisms. Stern, the first son of Anna Stern and Earned S. Stern, was born to a middle-class Jewish family in Hamburg, Germany, on 30 August 1902. Stern's father was an antiques dealer and sold dental supplies, and Stern's mother was a teacher. Shortly after Stern's birth, the family moved to Berlin, Germany. In 1918, Stern graduated from secondary school at Gymnasium Hindenburgschule in Berlin at the age of sixteen. Early graduation was common during the war because it enabled young men to be drafted into the military two years early. However, World War I [8] ended in 1918, and Stern did not join the army and continued his education. During his early education, Stern pursued microscopic studies of pond water, and he later studied zoology at the University of Berlin [9] in Berlin. After obtaining his bachelor's degree in zoology in 1920, Stern began his doctoral work at the University of Berlin [9]. He conducted his doctoral research on the process of mitosis [5] in the microbial eukaryote Heliozoa [10] in the lab of Max Hartmann, who studied protozoa [11]. Mitosis results in the transfer of genetic material from the parent cell to daughter cells, which enable tissues to grow or repair themselves. Scientists label most of the cells in eukaryotic organisms as somatic cells, which include every cell other than sex cells. Mitosis ensures that each cellular generation has the same genetic information as the previous generation. Stern received a PhD from the University of Berlin [9] in 1923 at the age of twenty-one. Stern began postdoctoral work in 1924 at Columbia University [12] in New York City, New York, in Thomas Hunt Morgan [13]'s lab, often called the Fly Room [14]. The Rockefeller Foundation [15], also in New York City, funded promising European postdoctoral researchers to spend a year or more researching in the United States. Stern received one of the first of those fellowships. Morgan's team studied the mechanisms of heredity and evolution [16] in fruit flies from the genus Drosophila [17]. Morgan had helped to show that genes [18] are located on chromosomes and are the basis of Gregor Mendel's 1866 theory of heredity, work the earned Morgan the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1933. Morgan helped to describe the process of meiosis [19] of germ cells [20], which produce sperm [21] or egg [22] cells. Scientists distinguish germ cells [20] from somatic cells, the latter of which include all kinds of cells except germ cells [20]. Like its somatic cells, an organism's germ cells [20] generally have a complete set of chromosomes. Many kinds of organisms, including humans [4] and fruit flies, have two sets of chromosomes in their somatic and germ cells. In those organisms, called diploids, one set is inherited from the mother and the other from the father. Germs cells go through a process called meiosis [19], in which they divide into two sex cells, sperm [21] cells in males or egg [22] cells in females, and each of those cells has only one set of chromosomes. During the first stage of meiosis [19], however, the chromosomes in the germ cells [20] align up next to each other such that each maternal chromosome pairs with one paternal chromosome. In a process called crossing over, the paired chromosomes separate parts from their own strands, exchange those parts, and incorporate the new parts in place of the old parts. Via the process of crossing-over (recombination), germ cells [20] produce gametes that have different chromosomes than either of the organism's parents, increasing genetic diversity across generations. Stern relied on the processes of meiosis [19] and recombination in his Columbia experiments. In the Fly Room [14], Stern collaborated with Calvin Bridges, also at Columbia University [12], to describe the relative placement of five genes [18] on the left end of the second chromosome in Drosophila [17] melanogaster. Especially in the eyes and wings of those fruits flies, researchers had identified five normal characteristics (wild-type), but for each of those characteristics, some flies had abnormal characteristics (mutant). They hypothesized that a normal gene caused a normal characteristic to develop, and an abnormal gene caused the abnormal characteristics to develop. Bridges had earlier shown that the hypothesized genes [18] were likely on the second chromosome of Drosophila [17]. Stern and Bridges collaborated to determine the locations on the second chromosome of those genes [18], in relation to each other. Stern and Bridges mated normal and mutant individuals in different combinations to observe the physical characteristics (phenotypes) of the offspring. Stern and Bridges observed the phenotypic results of genetic recombination in multiple generations of Drosophila [17] offspring. They used that information to develop a linkage map showing which characteristics are most often inherited together, and they established the relative order of the genes [18] on the left end of the chromosome. When two genes [18] are inherited together in a chromosome, scientists describe them as linked. Stern and Bridges reasoned that the greater the frequency of genetic recombination between known genetic markers, the further apart they were on the chromosome. In other work conducted at Columbia, Stern showed that temperature and age affect the occurrence of crossing-over in the first chromosomes of Drosophila [17]. Stern found that the rate of crossing-over increased in female Drosophila [17] as they aged in room temperature, but decreased as they aged in warmer temperatures. Stern concluded that environmental factors during reproduction in Drosophila [17] affect the genetic combinations of offspring, and therefore their phenotypic characteristics. Stern met a US citizen, Evelyn Sommerfield, in 1925 while working in Morgan's lab. The couple later married in 1931, and had three daughters. Stern returned to the University of Berlin [9] in 1926 and worked as an assistant to Richard Goldschmidt [23] at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Biology. During this time, Stern helped Goldschmidt edit his book Physiologische Theorie der Vererbung (Physiological Theory of Heredity [24]), and was otherwise free to pursue his own research on crossing over. He stayed in Berlin for six years, where he wrote his first two books, Multiple Allelie (Multiple Allelism) in 1930, and Faktorenkoppelung und Faktorenaustausch (Coupling Factors and Factors Exchange) in 1933, and he published dozens of papers. Stern returned to the United States in 1932. He received a second fellowship from the Rockefeller Foundation [15] to visit the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California, where he again joined Morgan's Fly Room [14], as the lab had moved. In 1933, Adolf Hitler assumed power in Germany. Stern, of Jewish decent, and his wife decided that his return to Germany was not safe, and the couple elected to stay in the United States permanently. Stern accepted a research associate position in 1933 at the University of Rochester in Rochester, New York. In 1936, Stern published the results of his ten years of research on crossing-over in Drosophila [17]. In his research, Stern studied traits that offspring inherit from their mothers, especially those hypothesized to result from genes [18] on the X chromosome inherited from their mothers. The process of mitosis [5] normally results in two daughter cells identical to the parent cell and to each other. While studying fruit flies, Stern observed that a parent cell sometimes divided and produced daughter cells that were not identical to each other, as one part or tissue of a fruit fly would be normal but would have underdeveloped spots within it. Stern found that the difference between daughter cells occurred during mitosis [5] when crossing-over occurred, a process previously theorized to happen only during meiosis [19]. Stern found that somatic crossing-over does not follow the normal process of mitosis [5]. By observing crossing-over of somatic cells, Stern found that genes [18] on the female X chromosome, genes [18] called sex-linked genes [18], could segregate themselves into combinations that, if they occurred in gametes, would be lethal if transmitted to offspring. In 1937 Stern became an assistant professor at the University of Rochester and, in 1941, a full professor and chair of the department of zoology. In 1939, Stern became a US Citizen. During World War II, Stern conducted research for the US government on the effects of radiation [3]. Stern's research studied the effects of exposure to low doses of x-rays and gamma radiation [3] to assess if there was a safe level of exposure. He concluded that there is no safe level of exposure, and that x-rays can be harmful to the body by causing genetic mutations. In 1947, Stern accepted a position at the University of California, Berkeley, in Berkeley, California.
Recommended publications
  • ERNST CASPARI and CURT STERN2 University of Rochester, Rochester, N
    THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONlC IRRADIATION WITH GAMMA- RAYS AT LOW DOSAGES ON THE MUTATION RATE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER‘ ERNST CASPARI AND CURT STERN2 University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y. Received November 25, 1947 HE influence of radiation of short wave length on the mutation rate in TDrosophila has been measured repeatedly since the pioneer work of MUL- LER (1927). As a general rule it was found that the mutation rate is directly proportional to the dose of radiation, as expressed in r units. This linear pro- portionality between radiation dose and mutation rate applies to all dosages of X-rays tested to the present time except for the highest dosages, in which a “saturation effect” comes into play. At the low end of the curve, SPENCER and STERN(1948) found the proportionalitv maintained down to a dose of 25 r. It was furthermore found that at high and medium dosages the mutation rate was independent of the intensity, that is, of the time over which the ap- plication of a certain number of r units was spread. This was established by PATTERSON(1931) and OLIVER(1932) and others for X-rays, and by HANSON and HEYS(1929, 1932) and KAYCHAUDHURI(1939) for gamma-rays. TIMO- F~EFF-RESSOVSKYand ZrMMER (1935) have calculated that in all experiments a dose of about 3600 r would result in a mutation rate of ten sex-linked reces- sive lethals per IOO treated sperms. The experiments reported in this paper have been undertaken in order to examine the question of whether or not the rule that the mutation rate is independent of the time of irradiation also holds for low dosages.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock's World
    Barbara McClintock’s World Timeline adapted from Dolan DNA Learning Center exhibition 1902-1908 Barbara McClintock is born in Hartford, Connecticut, the third of four children of Sarah and Thomas Henry McClintock, a physician. She spends periods of her childhood in Massachusetts with her paternal aunt and uncle. Barbara at about age five. This prim and proper picture betrays the fact that she was, in fact, a self-reliant tomboy. Barbara’s individualism and self-sufficiency was apparent even in infancy. When Barbara was four months old, her parents changed her birth name, Eleanor, which they considered too delicate and feminine for such a rugged child. In grade school, Barbara persuaded her mother to have matching bloomers (shorts) made for her dresses – so she could more easily join her brother Tom in tree climbing, baseball, volleyball, My father tells me that at the and football. age of five I asked for a set of tools. He My mother used to did not get me the tools that you get for an adult; he put a pillow on the floor and give got me tools that would fit in my hands, and I didn’t me one toy and just leave me there. think they were adequate. Though I didn’t want to tell She said I didn’t cry, didn’t call for him that, they were not the tools I wanted. I wanted anything. real tools not tools for children. 1908-1918 McClintock’s family moves to Brooklyn in 1908, where she attends elementary and secondary school. In 1918, she graduates one semester early from Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    Copyright Ó 2006 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove Edward Novitski: Drosophila Virtuoso James F. Crow,*,1 Dan Lindsley† and John Lucchesi‡ *Genetics Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, †Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, California 92093, and ‡Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 DWARD Novitski, 1918–2006, was the acknowledged attempts to extricate himself make an amusing story. E master of that special art of manipulating chro- The second part of Ed’s book is the story of his own life. mosomes during what Lucchesi (1994) called ‘‘the age The third is his account of the rift between Alfred of Drosophila chromosome mechanics.’’ Following the Sturtevant and Theodosius Dobzhansky. Novitski had Sturtevant tradition, his guiding principle was to derive the unique vantage point of having been successively a as much information as possible from breeding experi- student of each of them, and he is clearly in Sturtevant’s ments with minimum use of direct cytological examina- corner. The fourth part is titled ‘‘The Pleasure of Find- tion. Nobody could perform this kind of chromosome ing Things Out.’’ It recounts some of his most interest- manipulation as well as Ed and he relished new chal- ing intellectual challenges. The book is as idiosyncratic lenges. (Novitski’s closest friends and relatives, especially as Ed himself, a mixture of deep science, anecdotes, in later years, called him Eddie, a name he seems to have intellectual depth, and whimsy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vigor. Balanced Polymorphism. in Other Words, the Population Fails To
    VOL. 46, 1960 GENETICS: DOBZHANSKY AND PAVLOVSKY 41 28 Wakil, S. J., E. B. Titchener, and D. M. Gibson, Biochim. et Biophys. Acta, 29, 225 (1958). 29 Lynen, F., J. Knappe, E. Lorch, G. Jutting, and E. Ringelmann, Angew. Chem., 71, 481 (1959). 30 Flavin, M., P. J. Ortiz, and S. Ochoa, Nature, 176, 823 (1955). 31 Smith, R. M., and K. J. Monty, Biochem. Biophys. Research Communications, 1, 105 (1959). 32 Barker, H. A., H. Weissbach, and R. D. Smyth, these PROCEEDINGS, 44, 1093 (1958). 33 Lipmann, F., and L. C. Tuttle, J. Biol. Chem., 159, 21 (1945). 34 Delwiche, E. A., E. F. Phares, and S. F. Carson, J. Bact., 71, 598 (1956). 36 Wakil, S. J., J. Am. Chem, Soc., 80, 6465 (1958). 36 Formica, J. V., and R. 0. Brady, J. Am. Chem Soc., 81, 752 (1959). 37 Stern, J. R., D. L. Friedman, and G. K. K. Menon, Biochim. et Biophys. Acta; 36, 299 (1959). 38 Tietz, A., and S. Ochoa, J. Biol. Chem., 234, 1394 (1959). 39 Ochoa, S., Personal communication. 40 Swick, R. W., and H. G. Wood (unpublished data). 41 Swick, R. W., and J. R. Stern (unpublished data)). HOW STABLE IS BALANCED POLYMORPHISM?* BY THEODOSIUS DOBZHANSKY AND OLGA PAVLOVSKY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Communicated November 24, 1959 Natural populations of many species of organisms are polymorphic, i.e., are composed of two or more distinct kinds of individuals. Several genetic mecha- nisms may participate in the maintenance of polymorphism in populations. -5 One of the most widespread and interesting ones is balanced polymorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics-PDF.Pdf
    Second Edition Karvita B. Ahluwalia Formerly ProfessorProfessor Cell Biology and Electron Microscope Section Department of Biophysics All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India Copyright © 2009, 1985, New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers Published by New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this ebook may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher. All inquiries should be emailed to [email protected] ISBN (13) : 978-81-224-2880-3 PUBLISHING FOR ONE WORLD NEW AGE INTERNATIONAL (P) LIMITED, PUBLISHERS 4835/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110002 Visit us at www.newagepublishers.com Dedicated to My Parents This page intentionally left blank Preface to the Second Edition In view of the dramatic advances in this rapidly progressing field, Genetics has been updated to present the most current information available. About 22 years ago when the first edition was printed, recombinant DNA technology was an emerging field, beginning to find its way into molecular biology laboratories. Over the years, the invention of new technologies have expanded recombinant DNA technology significantly. The sequencing of whole genomes, not only of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, even humans has been achieved successfully. In the scenario that now exists, sophisticated techniques have become more and more routine and available in many research laboratories. Bioinformatics has made inroads into, and become an integral component of molecular biology research. It is now time to develop new approaches for elucidating gene function and processes involved in running the metabolic machinery of the whole cell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of the Gene
    Dartmouth College Dartmouth Digital Commons Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty Faculty Work 1-1-2000 The problem of the gene Michael Dietrich Dartmouth College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa Part of the Biology Commons Dartmouth Digital Commons Citation Dietrich, Michael, "The problem of the gene" (2000). Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty. 27. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Work at Dartmouth Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty by an authorized administrator of Dartmouth Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la vie / Life Sciences 323 (2000) 1139–1146 © 2000 Académie des sciences/Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. Tous droits réservés S0764446900012579/FLA The problem of the gene Michael R. Dietrich* Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Abstract – During the early 20th century the diverse practices of genetics were unified by the concept of the gene. This classical gene was simultaneously a unit of structure, function, mutation, and recombination. Starting in the 1940s, however, the classical gene began to fragment. Today when we speak of a gene for some malady, a regulatory gene, a structural gene, or a gene frequency, it is entirely possible that we are deploying different gene concepts even though we are using the same term. The problem of the gene addresses the fragmentation of the classical gene concept by asking to what extent a comprehensive and unifying gene concept is possible or desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneticist LC Dunn: Politics, Activism, and Community
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Melinda Gormley for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of Science presented on December 15, 2006. Title: Geneticist L.C. Dunn: Politics, Activism, and Community Abstract Approved: Mary Jo Nye L. C. Dunn (1893-1974) spent most of his scientific career conducting research in developmental genetics as a member of the Zoology Department at Columbia University in the City of New York. He had an accomplished scientific career researching mutations in mice, which earned him respect from other geneticists and scientists. Genetics research, however, was only one aspect of Dunn’s activities. He also campaigned for political and social rights, usually focusing his attention on problems pertinent to scientists and science. Guiding Dunn were his beliefs in socialism, democracy, and intellectual freedom, as well as his humanitarianism. He effectively participated on campaigns in two ways, remaining out of the public eye by performing committee work and entering the public sphere by publishing and lecturing. Dunn did not act alone, but rather was a member of various networks forming an active community of intellectuals. Together these scholars organized privately and acted publicly in an effort to combat what they viewed as society’s injustices, and through their intellectual and political participation they shaped American society. This dissertation focuses on Dunn’s professional years from the 1920s to 1950s and explores L.C. Dunn’s role as a socio-political activist among a community of scholars. ©Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • Schaum's Outline of Genetics
    SCHAUM’S outlines Genetics This page intentionally left blank SCHAUM’S outlines Genetics Fifth Edition Susan L. Elrod, Ph.D. Professor of Biological Sciences California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo William D. Stansfield, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor of Biological Sciences California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo Schaum’s Outline Series New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto SUSAN L. ELROD has degrees in Biological Sciences from California State University, Chico (B.S., 1986) and Genetics from the University of California, Davis (Ph.D., 1995). Graduate work was followed by a Postdoctoral Fellowship at Novozymes Biotech, Inc., in Davis, California. Her research is focused on the molecular genetics of yeast and filamentous fungal systems, with a particular interest in industrial and environmental applications. She holds three patents and has published in the area of gene cloning and protein expression in Aspergillus oryzae. She has been Professor in the Biological Sciences Department at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, since 1997, where she teaches introductory and advanced Genetics, and is Director of the university Center for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Education. WILLIAM D. STANSFIELD has degrees in Agriculture (B.S., 1952), Education (M.A., 1960), and Genetics (M.S., 1962; Ph.D., 1963; University of California at Davis). His published research is in immunogenetics, twinning, and mouse genetics. From 1957 to 1959 he was an instructor in high school. He was a faculty member of the Biological Sciences Department of California Polytechnic State University from 1963 to 1992 and is now Emeritus Professor.
    [Show full text]
  • CURT STERN August 30, 1902-October 23, 1981
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C U R T S TERN 1902—1981 A Biographical Memoir by J AMES V. NEEL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1987 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CURT STERN August 30, 1902-October 23, 1981 BY JAMES V. NEEL HERE HAVE BEEN three remarkable periods in the his- Ttory of modern genetics. The first of these, in the early years of this century, encompasses the rediscovery and confirmation of Mendel's findings and the enunciation of the chromosomal theory of inheritance. The second period is characterized by a concatenation of discoveries regarding the more precise mechanisms of chromosomal behavior, largely based on the use of Drosophila and emanating from the "fly room" at Columbia University. The third is the period in which we now find ourselves, initiated in the 1940s by the seminal observations of Avery and collaborators and the later phage work demonstrating that the essential genetic material was DNA and the demonstration, using Neurospora, that genes have essential and specific roles in the synthesis of pro- teins. This was followed by the elucidation of the structure of DNA, leading to a cascade of discoveries concerning DNA fine structure and how it can be manipulated. Each of these flowerings dominated the conceptual biological thinking of the time. NOTE: This memoir is an expanded version of a manuscript published in the An- nual Review of Genetics. I am deeply indebted to the many people who have contrib- uted their remembrances and perspective to the writing of this memoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Goldschmidt and the Crossing-Over Controversy
    Copyright 2002 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove Richard Goldschmidt and the Crossing-Over Controversy Marsha L. Richmond* and Michael R. Dietrich†,1 *Interdisciplinary Studies Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 and †Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 NE of the basic tenets linking the Mendelian laws dictable ways, just as physicists had seen atoms as discrete O to the chromosomal theory of heredity was the units whose interactions followed definite ‘laws’” (Allen assumption of “crossing over.” On the basis of F. A. 1978, p. 51). Not surprisingly, then, the Morgan group Jannsen’s description of the “physical twisting or inter- responded forcefully when in 1917 Richard Gold- twining that occurred between paired homologous chro- schmidt directly challenged their mechanistic interpre- mosomes during the early stages of meiosis” (Jannsen tation of crossing over. 1909), the notion of crossing over was first employed by Thomas Hunt Morgan in 1911 as a satisfactory me- chanical explanation for the factorial recombination THE VARIABLE FORCES HYPOTHESIS found in Mendelian crosses. Crossing over, as Garland In “Crossing Over ohne Chiasmatypie?,” published in Allen noted, thus became a foundational assumption the second volume of Genetics, Goldschmidt did not, of in the subsequent articulation of the Mendelian chro- course, deny that crossing over or genetic recombina- mosome theory of heredity. Morgan and his co-workers tion took place. Rather, he questioned the chiasmatype proposed a “beads-on-a-string” model of the chromo- hypothesis. While praising the work of the Morgan some, with genes represented as particulate beads school by noting that they had provided, through the strung together linearly like pearls on a necklace.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Occurrence of Translocations and A
    36 GENETICS: C. STERN PROC. N. A S. 6 Metz, Biol. Zentralb., 51, 121 (1931); Metz and Schmuck, these PROCEEDINGS, 17, 272 (1931). 7 Metz, Amer. Nat., 68, 487 (1929). 8 DuBois, these PROCEEDINGS, 18, 352 (1932); Jour. Morph., 54, 161 (1932); Zeits. f. Zelf. u. mik. Anat., 19, 395 (1933). 9 Metz and Schmuck, Genetics, 16, 225 (1931). 10 Metz and Schmuck, these PROCEEDINGS, 15, 863 (1929); Ibid., 15, 867 (1929); Metz, Quart. Rev. Biol., 6, 306 (1931). ON THE OCCURRENCE OF TRANSLOCATIONS AND A UTOSOMAL NON-DISJUNCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER By CURT STERN' DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER, ROCHESTER, N. Y. Communicated November 28, 1933 Recent findings on different plants indicate that the presence of extra chromosomes in an organism facilitates the occurrence of exchanges of non-homologous chromosomal parts. It seemed desirable to test if such exchanges occur also in heteroploid Drosophila melanogaster both from the point of the validity of the generalization of the findings as well as for the possibility of finding a method to obtain non-homologous exchanges in non-radiated flies. Triploid Drosophilae were chosen for this investiga- tion. Translocations within one chromosomal pair as well as between non-homologous chromosomes were to be expected if the findings on plants would hold true for Drosophila. However, as a first part of the investiga- tion, only the possibility of translocations between non-homologous chromosomes was tested. The outcome was fully negative: None of the more than 900 haploid gametes coming from triploid females contained a translocation between the first, second or third chromosomes (the fourth chromosome was-on account of its comparatively small size-expected to be of less importance than the others and its fate therefore not followed).
    [Show full text]
  • 21Stcenturysciencetech.Com Ernment Had No Authority to Charter Such Foster Growing Impoverishment
    21st CENTURY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Vol. 24, No. 3 Fall 2011 Features News 28 N MEMORIAM Zbigniew Jaworowski (1927-2011) Are Carbonate Solutions Alive? 8 A Scientist Who Fought V.L. Voeikov, Do Minh Ha, N.D. Vilenskaya, For Truth S.I. Malishenko, and E.V. Bouravleva Laurence Hecht and Bicarbonate aqueous systems, the necessary constituents Marjorie Mazel Hecht of all biological liquids, exhibit a sustained non-equilibrium 30 Glaciers, Graves, and state and sensitivity to cosmic events. Stratosphere: Tracing the INTERVIEW: DR. EDWARD CALABRESE Prophets of Gloom 20 How a ‘Big Lie’ Launched the LNT Myth and Zbigniew Jaworowski’s outline for The Great Fear of Radiation his autobiography 35 Curriculum Vitae of A well-known toxicologist discusses Zbigniew Jaworowski his startling discovery that the linear no-threshold or LNT hypothesis, which governs radiation and chemical protection policy today, was founded on a deliberate lie to further a political agenda. Hermann Muller, Zbigniew Michael R. Fox receiving his Nobel Prize Jaworowski in 1946, for his discovery that mutations can be 37 IN MEMORIAM induced by X-rays. Michael R. Fox (1937-2011) Lilly Library, Indiana University, and Svenskt Press A Passionate Voice for Science Marjorie Mazel Hecht 38 AN INTERVIEW WITH BOOKS MICHAEL R. FOX Departments 49 Alias Papa: A Life of Fritz Schumacher, Author of What We Can Learn from EDITORIAL Small Is Beautiful Fukushima 2 We Need a Hamiltonian Solution! by Barbara Wood 43 Remembering Dr. Michael Fox: 3 VIEWPOINT Reviewed by Marjorie Mazel Hecht American
    [Show full text]