DOCSLIB.ORG

1 MPCP(20)28 Church Commissioners Mission, Pastoral

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 MPCP(20)28 Church Commissioners Mission, Pastoral MPCP(20)28 Church Commissioners Mission, Pastoral and Church Property Committee Closed Church of Croglin St John (Diocese of Carlisle) Representations Concerning a draft Pastoral (Church Buildings Disposal) Scheme Note by Harvey Howlett Summary (i) The Committee is invited to consider one representation against and one letter of comment concerning a draft Pastoral (Church Buildings Disposal) Scheme providing for the sale of the closed church building of Croglin St John and part of the annexed land for residential use. (ii) The representors against strongly objects to the conversion of the church building because of the impact on the surrounding open churchyard. He argues that the church’s desire for capital is being put in front of the wishes of the dead and that there is a distinct lack of respect being shown to those buried who are under the protection of the church. (iii) The letter of comment from the Parish Council notes that whilst the Council would have preferred to see the building remain in community use there has not been sufficient interest from within the local community to take on a project of this kind. (iv) The Diocese has confirmed that they wish the draft Scheme to proceed notwithstanding the representation. The Dioceses recognise that they have a responsibility of care and respect to those buried in the churchyard, and to their families, but that there is similarly a statutory responsibility laid on them to secure a suitable and sustainable future for the church building itself. They argue that the proposed scheme successfully resolves the tension in handling these competing responsibilities, through keeping to an absolute minimum the area of land sold with the church and ensuring that there is appropriate access into the retained churchyard for visitors and on the occasion of new burials. (v) The case has been examined by the Committee’s case sifting representatives who agreed the case should be considered on the papers alone. (vi) In considering the representations, the Committee will need to have regard to the legislative requirement as to the suitability of what is being 1 proposed. If the Committee considers the proposed use to be suitable in principle, it is still possible that the use might be unsuitable in the particular circumstances of this building because of its location or other factors relating to the impact of the use. These could include the potential for disruption and disturbance of the surrounding churchyard. (vii) The main issues to be considered are therefore, as follows: • Is the proposed use of the building residential use a “suitable” use within the meaning of the Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011? • Are the concerns expressed in the representation against the draft Scheme of such substance and weight that the proposed use is to be considered unsuitable for the building in this location? • Will the proposals, taken as a whole, support the furtherance of the mission of the Church of England? Recommendation The Committee is invited to consider the representations and the issues set out in this report and, in the light of these, whether the draft Scheme should proceed. 2 Introduction 1. The Committee is invited to consider one representation against and one letter of comment received concerning a draft Pastoral (Church Buildings Disposal) Scheme providing for the sale of the closed church building of Croglin St Johnin the Diocese of Carlisle and part of the annexed land for educational, cultural and community purposes 2. St John’s is a small Grade II Listed Victorian church building constructed of local red sandstone underneath a graduated green slate roof standing within a rural village in the picturesque Eden valley to the south-east of Carlisle, flanked by the Pennines to the east and within the North Pennines Area Of Natural Beauty (AONB). 3. The present church building replaced an earlier medieval building. The most prominent feature is the gabled double belcote at the west end, with a clock face and two lancets beneath. The interior of the church is whitewashed, with plain softwood benches and choir stalls. 4. The building stands in a well-buried churchyard and occupies a sloping site, bounded by a drystone wall. Under the current proposals the churchyard will continue to be used as a burial ground and maintained by the parochial church council, with the existing access arrangements being retained. 5. Due to a decline in the size of the congregation, St John’s was closed for regular public worship in April 2012. Early proposals for the appropriation of the building to residential use were consulted on in 2014 and 2015, but following the submission of representations the Diocese decided to allow time for the Parish Council and local residents to investigate the possibility of a community use being secured for St John’s. In the event such a use has not been forthcoming, and the current residential proposal has resulted from the recent further marketing of the property. 6. Attached are: Annex A Background to the case; Annex B The report on the church building by the Church Buildings Council and the advice of the Statutory Advisory Committee; Annex C A copy of the draft Scheme and accompanying note which includes a site plan; Annex D A copy of the letter referring the representations to the Bishop together the response from the Diocese; Annex R A copy of the representations; and Annex S Supplementary Comments (if any). 3 Representations Received 7. Following the publication of the draft Scheme in February 2020 the Commissioners received one representation against and one letter of comment. 8. The representation against the proposals comes from Mr George Ritchie, who had previously represented against earlier similar proposals affecting the church and re-affirmed his earlier strong objection to the appropriation of the building to residential use. He argues that those buried in the churchyard have a right to rest in peace. He argues that the church’s desire for capital is being put in front of the wishes of the dead and that there is a distinct lack of respect being shown to those buried who are under the protection of the church. He argues that the churchyard should be left as it is and asks whether the people who have plots in Croglin, those currently buried there and those to be buried there, would have purchased them if there was a house in the graveyard instead of a church. 9. The note from the Chairman of Ainstable Parish Council expresses thanks for giving the local community time to try and find a use for the building. He notes that whilst the Council would have preferred to see the building remain in community use there has not been sufficient interest from within the local community to take on a project of this kind. 10. Copies of the representations are attached at Annex R. Diocesan Response to the Representations 11. Following normal practice, a copy of the representations was sent to the Bishop of Carlisle to seek his comments. A copy of the letter referring the representations to the Bishop together with a copy of the response, sent on the Bishop’s behalf are attached at Annex D. 12. The response sets out the background and history of marketing the building, including consultations with the local planning authority and with Ainstable Parish Council. The Diocese explains that, whilst many people place a high value on the peace and tranquillity of a church and its associated churchyard, churches have quite often been the centre of village life and a hub of community activity. The response argues that It does not seem inappropriate that a church building should be fully used for a variety of purposes beyond purely ‘ecclesiastical’ ones, nor that this would be disrespectful to those who are buried nearby. 13. The Diocese has set out the belief that at least a small area of outdoor space is a desirable element in residential accommodation, although in the case of St John’s an attempt has been made to keep this to the absolute minimum in line with the local planning authority’s advice. However they write that the quiet nature of the open churchyard will be respected by virtue of the fact that only a very small area of land at the rear of the church building would be made available for domestic use. To all intents and purposes the view of the churchyard from the main road would remain unaffected by a residential use 4 of the property. The Diocese also makes suggestions for the Commissioners as to covenants which would ensure outdoor activity in the residential part ceased when funerals are taking place, provided appropriate notice has been given in advance to the occupiers of the former church. 14. The Diocese notes that the Church of England is required to secure an appropriate future use for those buildings which may no longer be required pastorally or for regular public worship and argues that, in fulfilling this responsibility, they are contributing to the mission of the Church of England. In the case of St John’s, they write that the proposal will ensure that this important heritage asset will be preserved and funds from the sale of the property will be applied to the mission of the Church of England at the diocesan level. 15. The Diocese notes that proposals enable the churchyard to continue in use including the annual Remembrance Service around the war memorial in the churchyard and unrestricted access for the purpose of visiting and tending graves. 16. The end noting that the church was closed for regular public worship eight years ago and that I t would be good to put an end to this long period of uncertainty over the future of the building.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LD19 Carlisle City Local Plan 2001-2016
    Carlisle District Local Plan 2001 - 2016 Written Statement September 2008 Carlisle District Local Plan 2001-2016 Written Statement September 2008 If you wish to contact the City Council about this plan write to: Local Plans and Conservation Manager Planning and Housing Services Civic Centre Carlisle CA3 8QG tel: 01228 817193 fax: 01228 817199 e-mail: [email protected] This document can also be viewed on the Council’s website: www.carlisle.gov.uk/localplans A large print or audio version is also available on request from the above address Cover photos © Carlisle City Council; CHedley (Building site), CHedley (Irish Gate Bridge), Cumbria County Council (Wind turbines) Carlisle District Local Plan 2001-16 2 September 2008 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction Purpose of the Local Plan ........................................................................................ 5 Format of the Local Plan .......................................................................................... 5 Planning Context ....................................................................................................... 6 The Preparation Process ........................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Spatial Strategy and Development Principles The Vision ..................................................................................................................... 9 The Spatial Context ................................................................................................... 9 A Sustainable Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Paper 5
    Planning Cumbria Cumbria and Lake District Joint Structure Plan 2001 – 2016 Technical Paper 5 Landscape Character Preface to Technical Paper 5 Landscape Character 1. The Deposit Structure Plan includes a policy (Policy E33) on landscape character, while the term landscape character is also used in other policies. It is important that there is clear understanding of this term and how it is to be applied in policy terms. 2. This report has been commissioned by the County Council from CAPITA Infrastructure Consultancy in Carlisle. It is currently not endorsed by the County Council. On receipt of comments the County Council will re draft the report and then publish it as a County Council document. The final version will replace two previous publications: Technical paper No 4 (1992) on the Assessment of County Landscapes and the Cumbria Landscapes Classification (1995). 3. The report explains how landscape has been characterised in Cumbria (outside the National Parks) using landscape types and provides details of the classification into 37 landscape types and sub types. A recent review of the classification of County Landscapes (now termed Landscapes of County Importance) and their detailed boundaries are also included. 4. It should be noted that this report does not constitute Structure Plan Policy. It provides background information to enable the policy to be implemented and monitored. 5. Comments on this report should be sent to: Mike Smith Countryside and Landscape Officer Cumbria County Council County Offices Kendal Cumbria LA9 4RQ Tel:
    [Show full text]
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • [CUMBERLAND.] BRAMPTON. 120 POST OFFICE Liddle Joseph, Blacksmith Commercial
    [CUMBERLAND.] BRAMPTON. 120 POST OFFICE Liddle Joseph, blacksmith coMMERCIAL. Holliday Nathan, farmer Mitchison Robert, joiner, Green spot Barnes John, Travellers' Rest Pattinson Robert, farmer, Whitrigg ho Wbiterigg. Crozier Thomas, farmer V ever Sarah (Mrs.), shopkeeper Pattinson Mr. Robert, Whitrigg hall Glaister John & William, farmers V ever William, farmer BRAMPTON is a township, parish, small market town, National school was completed in 1857, at a cost of £1,260, and polling place for the eastern division of Cumberland, and has an average attendance of 150 children. The English distant 9~ miles-east-north-east from Carlisle, 50~ west from Presbyterian school is attended by about 60 scholars. The Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 305 north-north-west from London, Infant school has an average attendance of 100 children. and H from Milton station on the Newcastle and Carlisle This township is situate in the Eskdale Ward, union of its railway; it is bounded on the north by Deuton, Lanercost, own name, eastern division of the county, and diocese of and Walton ; on the east by Northumberland; on the south Carlisle, and according to the historian Camtlen, this town by Hayton, Castle Carrock, and Geltsdale Forest, and on the was formerly the site of the Roman station Bremetenracum, west hy Irthington. The town is situated between the rivers which some modern writers, with more probability, have Irthing and Gelt, tributaries of the Eden, about 1 mile south fixed as Old Penrith. The town sustained an extensive of the former, and 2~ from the point where they unite, and siege during the wars of Edward II., of which, as well as of lies about 2 miles south of the Roman wall, in a deep its e!ll'lier importance it still exhibits evident marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Conservation Action Plan Part 1
    Fellfoot Forward Landscape Conservation Action Plan Part 1 Fellfoot Forward Landscape Partnership Scheme Landscape Conservation Action Plan 1 Fellfoot Forward is led by the North Pennines AONB Partnership and supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Our Fellfoot Forward Landscape Partnership includes these partners Contents Landscape Conservation Action Plan Part 1 1. Acknowledgements 3 8 Fellfoot Forward LPS: making it happen 88 2. Foreword 4 8.1 Fellfoot Forward: the first steps 89 3. Executive Summary: A Manifesto for Our Landscape 5 8.2 Community consultation 90 4 Using the LCAP 6 8.3 Fellfoot Forward LPS Advisory Board 93 5 Understanding the Fellfoot Forward Landscape 7 8.4 Fellfoot Forward: 2020 – 2024 94 5.1 Location 8 8.5 Key milestones and events 94 5.2 What do we mean by landscape? 9 8.6 Delivery partners 96 5.3 Statement of Significance: 8.7 Staff team 96 what makes our Fellfoot landscape special? 10 8.8 Fellfoot Forward LPS: Risk register 98 5.4 Landscape Character Assessment 12 8.9 Financial arrangements 105 5.5 Beneath it all: Geology 32 8.10 Scheme office 106 5.6 Our past: pre-history to present day 38 8.11 Future Fair 106 5.7 Communities 41 8.12 Communications framework 107 5.8 The visitor experience 45 8.13 Evaluation and monitoring 113 5.9 Wildlife and habitats of the Fellfoot landscape 50 8.14 Changes to Scheme programme and budget since first stage submission 114 5.10 Moorlands 51 9 Key strategy documents 118 5.11 Grassland 52 5.12 Rivers and Streams 53 APPENDICES 5.13 Trees, woodlands and hedgerows 54 1 Glossary
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No. 26 – WINTER 2019
    NEWSLETTER No. 26 – WINTER 2019 1. From the Chairman Seasons Greetings to all our members. We have a new programme for a new year. I hope that everyone will find something of interest in it. CVBG has been in existence since 2013. Many members joined in that year and have been regular attenders at events. New members are joining all the time. Over the six or seven years, we have acquired much experience of a wide variety of building types and materials. Many of our newer members come with a great deal of knowledge of vernacular buildings and/or live in a traditional house and want to know more about it. With this in mind, the events at the start of the year are based indoors. We have learned from experience that the winter months are not the best time to work outdoors. Along the Lines, in January and February,all members will have the chance to contribute to a publication or display, by using a photograph, drawing or description of a building in their part of Cumbria. The end result will be a booklet or an illustrated map. Please make every effort to join in this project. We have by now, had sufficient experience of Cumbria's vernacular architecture to be able to publish material, either for general readers, or as contributions to other societies' journals. One of the stated aims of CVBG is to “increase enjoyment and understanding of the county's traditional buildings”. We can share our discoveries with a wider public. To help in this regard, we are investing in ISBN numbers so that our publications will be recognised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bulletin 77 – Summer 2018
    Bulletin 77 – Summer 2018 Yanwath Hall, Eamont Bridge, Penrith © Mike Turner CVBG Chairman’s Chat – Peter Roebuck 2 CLHF Members News - Holme and District LHS, Cumbria Railways 3 Association Other News from Member Groups 7 Cumbria Archive News 9 Help Requested 11 Welcome to new CLHF Committee Member 13 CLHF Museum Visits 14 Cumbria County History Trust 16 Proposed New CLHF Consitution 18 Funding for Local History Societies 19 General Data Protection Regulations 20 Useful Websites 20 Events 21 Final Thoughts 24 1 www.clhf.org.uk Chairman’s Chat. The recent spell of glorious weather prompts thoughts about the impact of climate on history. The great threat to local communities before modern times was harvest failure. Crisis mortality rates were often the result, not just of outbreaks of deadly disease; and the two sometimes combined. Cattle droving was fundamentally affected by climate, only getting underway sometime from mid-April once grass growth removed the need to use hay as fodder. Bees have rarely had such a good start as this year to their foraging season, reminding us of the significance of honey as the major sweetener before sugar became widely used. Cane sugar was first grown by the Portuguese in Brazil during the 16th century but entered the British market from the Caribbean only from 1650. Not until well beyond 1700 was it cheap enough to rival honey. The numerous bee boles and other shelters for straw skeps (hives) in Cumbria pay tribute to the care with which bees were kept. Beekeeping was no mere pastime but an activity of considerable economic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Lazonby Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029
    1 Lazonby Neighbourhood Plan [Pre-submission draft 29/06/17] LAZONBY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2014-2029 29/06/17 Pre-submission draft 2 Lazonby Neighbourhood Plan [Pre-submission draft 29/06/17] This plan has been prepared by the Lazonby Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, on behalf of Lazonby Parish Council and residents of the parish. It is dedicated to the Memory of Elizabeth Howe, who made an outstanding contribution to its production. 3 Lazonby Neighbourhood Plan [Pre-submission draft 29/06/17] Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Lazonby and its setting ................................................................................................................. 5 2 The Plan Development ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Initial Community Engagement ................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Pre-Submission Stage ................................................................................................................ 14 2.3 Sustainability Issues .................................................................................................................... 15 2.4 The Submission Plan for Independent Examination ................................................................... 15 2.5 Monitoring and Review ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tyneside Wednesday Hancock Coach Walks for Wednesday 11Th March 2020 Castle Carrock Route: A69, B6413 Maps: Ex315 Carlisle, OL5 Lakes NE Return at 5.30 Pm
    Tyneside Wednesday Hancock Coach Walks for Wednesday 11th March 2020 Castle Carrock Route: A69, B6413 Maps: Ex315 Carlisle, OL5 Lakes NE Return at 5.30 pm Pick up point: Lay-by adjacent to Hancock Museum, Claremont Rd, Newcastle NE2 4PT New members always welcome Return point: Lay-by adjacent to Hancock Museum To book a seat contact the Booking Secretary: 0191 284 0357 / 0191 680 0862 Please observe the following: Arrive 15 minutes before departure For safety reasons a minimum of 3 walkers (incl leader) is required on any walk Please stay behind or near the leader at all times. Observe the Country Code Leaders plan walks carefully, but you are ultimately responsible for your own Health & Safety Please fasten your seat belt when the coach is in motion OUR WALKS ARE GRADED AS FOLLOWS EASY Up to 12km/7mls Up to 200m/500ft ascent LEISURELY 12-16km/7-10mls Up to 300m/1000ft ascent MODERATE 10-20km/8-13mls Up to 600m/2000ft ascent STRENUOUS 20km/13mls or more. Ascent may be over 600m/2000ft 1 Christine Jackson LEISURELY NY539594 Tarn Road (B6413); Wreay; Low Gelt Bridge; Gelt Woods; 9mls/14.5km River Gelt; Middle Gelt Bridge; Greenwell; Meadow View; Garth Head; 1000 ft/305m Tottergill; Nixon Head; Reservoir; Castle Carrock 2 Tom Lancaster & John STRENUOUS NY542554-Castle Carrock; Garth Head; Low Hynam; track NY568562; Woodhouse Talkin Fell- trig and special cairns; no track NY576562; Simmerson Hill; 13mls/21km Gairs; Old Water Bridge; Shooting Box; NY574505; Cumrew Fell; 2300ft/700m ascent Carduneth Pike (ancient burials); Castle Carrock Fell;
    [Show full text]
  • Croglin Flood Report
    Croglin Flood Investigation Report No 66 Flood Event 28th June 2012 And 23rd July 2013 Cumbria County Council This flood investigation report has been produced by Cumbria County Council as a Lead Local Flood Authority under Section 19 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010. Version Undertaken by Reviewed by Approved by Date Preliminary Helen Renyard/ Anthony Lane 23rd Sept 2013 David White Draft Helen Renyard Anthony Lane 25th Sept 2013 Published Helen Renyard Anthony Lane Doug Coyle 9th April 2014 2 Serving the people of Cumbria Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Event Background ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Flooding Incident ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1: Location Plan. ............................................................................................................................... 5 Investigation ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Rainfall Event ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 th rd Figure 2: Rainfall
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Profile Report for DUKES HEAD, CARLISLE (Punch Outlet Number: 201769) ARMATHWAITE, CARLISLE, CA4 9PB (CA 4 9PB)
    Customer Profile Report for DUKES HEAD, CARLISLE (Punch Outlet Number: 201769) ARMATHWAITE, CARLISLE, CA4 9PB (CA 4 9PB) Copyright Experian Ltd, HERE 2015. Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright 2015 Age Data Table Count: Index: 0 - 0.5 0 - 1.5 0 - 3.0 0 - 5.0 15 Min 0 - 0.5 0 - 1.5 0 - 3.0 0 - 5.0 15 Min Miles Miles Miles Miles Drivetime Miles Miles Miles Miles Drivetime 0-15 36 70 286 880 1,167 63 70 83 87 87 16-17 9 13 34 92 125 127 104 80 73 75 18-24 14 24 70 261 354 51 49 42 53 55 25-34 16 27 92 299 429 38 37 37 40 44 35-44 35 67 236 681 883 90 99 102 99 97 45-54 74 128 399 1,131 1,482 171 168 154 147 146 55-64 51 100 339 998 1,301 147 165 164 163 160 65+ 71 107 373 1,069 1,427 129 111 113 110 111 Population estimate 2015 306 536 1,829 5,411 7,168 100 100 100 100 100 Ethnicity - Census 2011 Count: %: 0 - 0.5 0 - 1.5 0 - 3.0 0 - 5.0 15 Min 0 - 0.5 0 - 1.5 0 - 3.0 0 - 5.0 15 Min Miles Miles Miles Miles Drivetime Miles Miles Miles Miles Drivetime White 328 554 1,818 5,378 7,161 100% 99% 99% 99% 99% Mixed / Multiple Ethnic Groups 0 2 7 19 25 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Asian / Asian British 1 2 8 18 40 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Black / African / Caribbean / Black British 0 0 1 1 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other Ethnic Group 0 0 1 6 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% All People (Ethnic Group) 329 558 1,835 5,422 7,234 100 100 100 100 100 Copyright © 2016 Experian Limited.
    [Show full text]