Oldham Borough Council Council Meeting Wednesday 7 November

Oldham Borough Council

Council Meeting Wednesday 7 November 2012

OLDHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL

To: ALL MEMBERS OF OLDHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL, CIVIC CENTRE, OLDHAM Tuesday, 30 October 2012 You are hereby summoned to attend a meeting of the Council which will be held on Wednesday 7 November 2012 at 4.00 pm in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, for the following purposes:

1 Honorary Alderman Ceremony

A presentation will take place for Richard Knowles to honour his title of Honorary Alderman, as appointed by Council on 12 th September 2012, in accordance with Section 249(1) of the Local Government Act 1972, in recognition of his service and dedication to the local community as a Councillor for the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham. It is anticipated that the meeting will reconvene at 6.00pm or at a time thereafter declared by the Mayor

Open Council

2 Questions to Cabinet Members from the public and Councillors on ward or district issues

(20 minutes for public questions and 20 minutes for Councillor questions)

Formal Council

3 To receive apologies for absence

4 To order that the Minutes of the meeting of the Council held on the 12th September 2012 be signed as a correct record (Pages 1 - 24)

5 To receive declarations of interest in any matter to be determined at the meeting

6 To deal with matters which the Mayor considers to be urgent business

7 To receive communications relating to the business of the Council

8 To receive and note petitions received relating to the business of the Council

(time limit 20 minutes) No petitions received.

9 Outstanding Business from the previous meeting

(time limit 15 minutes). There is no outstanding business.

10 The Leader's Annual Statement

11 Youth Council

(time limit 20 minutes) Youth Council resolution for consideration at the Full council meeting – 7th November The Youth Council would like to ask Council to note their views on the costly and unsightly issue of Chewing Gum Disposal, In particular in the town centre and District centres of Oldham. There are three and a half billion pieces of Chewing gum that are irresponsibly disposed of every year in the UK. 80-90% of Chewing gum is not disposed of in any litter receptacle and it costs the British tax payer £150million each year to clean chewing gum off the streets. To help combat the cost of this in Oldham and improve the look of our streets the Youth Council feel we need to look at encouraging responsible disposal of Chewing gum. In researching solutions to this problem we have identified an ecological, attractive and effective solution – Gum Drop Bins. This small, round bins can be easily installed in town centres and offer an easy means to dispose of Chewing gum. The Gum drop Bins are made of recycled Chewing gum, and the Gumdrop along with its contents of used gum gets recycled to produce new gumdrop bins that are redistributed and the cycle begins again. This solution not only saves on the cost of cleaning up chewing gum, improves the cleanliness of our streets but reduces the growing strain on the environment. We would ask the council to note the Youth Councils view on this issue and to investigate the feasibility of providing this facility in Oldham.

12 Leader and Cabinet Question Time

(time limit 30 minutes – maximum of 2 minutes per question and 2 minutes per response)

13 To note the Minutes of the meetings of the Cabinet held on the undermentioned dates, including the attached list of urgent key decisions taken since the last meeting of the Council, and to receive any questions or observations on any items within the Minutes from Members of the Council who are not Members of the Cabinet, and receive responses from Cabinet Members (Pages 25 - 50)

(time limit 20 minutes) :-

a) 3 rd September 2012 b) 17 th September 2012 c) 22 nd October 2012 e) Urgent Key decisions – None

14 Notice of Administration Business

(time limit 30 minutes)

1. Councillor Jabbar to MOVE and Councillor J Harrison to SECOND

This council expresses its deep concern about the Government’s announcement to offer councils in England a one off payment to fund a council tax freeze in 2013/14. By limiting the council tax freeze to one year only, it will mean the deficit the following year is increased by the same amount. This means that a £1million government grant next year in exchange for not increasing council tax will cost Oldham Council £1million year after year. This is equivalent to every district library closing its doors to finance the gap in funding. Savage cuts to the public sector have reached breaking point and the time for one off grants is long gone. If the government is serious about fully funding grants to enable councils to freeze council tax it should make the grant permanent. The matter is so serious that unless the government confirms a permanent increase in the grant to at least a level equivalent to inflation, this council and many others across the country will be excluded from the scheme simply because it is not sustainable nor is it in the long term interests of our residents. The council also notes with concern that the government has placed a limit of 2% on the increase in council tax without a referendum, if a council chose not to take advantage of the current freeze grant offer. This council resolves to: 1. Support the Local Government Association (LGA) in lobbying government to fully fund the council tax freeze grant on a permanent basis and to at least a level equivalent to the rate of inflation, including submitting evidence on the impact on council services in Oldham if the Government keeps to its current plan. 2. Instruct the Chief Executive to write to the Secretary of State outlining the councils position and requesting urgent clarification on this matter, countersigned by the leaders of all political parties represented on Oldham Council (also copied to the LGA). 3. Enlist the support of the three MPs representing Oldham on this unfair proposal by the Government.

2. Councillor Williams to MOVE and Councillor Judge to SECOND

This Council welcomes the campaign of Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority (GMFRA), in partnership with the other Metropolitan Fire & Rescue Authorities, against the unfairness applied to the Government's Formula for the distribution of grant. The distribution of government funding, through the Formula, now favours Shire Fire & Rescue Authorities and Combined Fire Authorities, and protects London, at the expense of the urban/regional cities. Between 2011 and 2013, GMFRA, West Midlands, Merseyside, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire and Tyne & Wear Metropolitan Authorities will shoulder around 80% of the cuts compared to the rest of the Fire Services across the country. Shires, Combined Authorities and London between them will shoulder just short of 20%. Indeed, six of these Fire Authorities have perversely seen grant increases in the last two years. GMFRA are certain that, if the Formula Grant is not re-adjusted to ensure greater fairness, Greater Manchester will be faced with further damaging cuts, further significant reduction of firefighters, further significant fewer fire appliances, and potentially closures of fire stations. This level of cuts will also have serious consequences for the delivery of Fire & Rescue services for the people of Oldham and Greater Manchester and impact on the resilience of the infrastructure of Greater Manchester. This Council, therefore, calls on the Government to ensure everyone 'shares the pain of austerity' and introduces a fairer Grant Formula model for GMFRA and other Metropolitan Fire & Rescue Authorities elsewhere.

3. Councillor Dean to MOVE and Councillor Dearden to SECOND

This Council opposes the Government’s Welfare Reforms, which will have a devastating effect on the people of Oldham by reducing income for the poorest in our society to below subsistence level. This Council condemns the significant reduction in support for working families and for people with disabilities. This Council is concerned that the introduction of Universal Credit is ill thought out and is being introduced without any appropriate safeguards or adequate technical structures in place to help support families affected or to deliver the benefit to the people of Oldham. The Council intends to: - Write to the three Oldham MPs to express our concerns about the introduction of the Universal Credit, asking them to voice their concerns to Parliament - Write to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Ian Duncan Smith, outlining the devastating effects this change in benefits will have on the poorest people of Oldham. - Request the Chief Executive of Oldham Council prepare a detailed report outlining what action the Council can take to help support the most vulnerable, through programmes of advice, help with budget setting and counselling to help those affected through the changes in the benefit system.

15 Notice of Opposition Business

(time limit 30 minutes)

1. Councillor Thompson to MOVE and Councillor Williamson to SECOND

This council notes with concern: a) The recent announcement by the government of the proposal to relax certain planning laws relating to housing. b) That this announcement includes the intention to allow extensions of up to eight metres to be permitted development and the proposal to waive rules and existing commitments on affordable housing from proposed housing developments in certain circumstances. This council believes that: 1. The current planning laws are not the reason for a failure to proceed with existing approved housing developments. 2. These proposals go against the spirit of the Localism Act 2011 which encourages more local control of planning policies. 3. These proposals ignore local democracy, will fail to protect local communities and will encourage more neighbourhood disputes. Council therefore calls on the Chief Executive to write: - to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and to the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Planning) for Communities and Local Government, stating these concerns and urging them to withdraw the proposals. - to the borough’s three MPs, urging them to press the case for withdrawing the proposals.

2. Councillor Sykes to MOVE and Councillor Sedgwick to SECOND

The Localism Act 2011 makes provision for Local Authorities, subject to certain conditions, to replace the Leader and Cabinet or Elected Mayor models and allow a return to the traditional Committee based Governance System. Despite the Act being on the Statute Books for many months, to date, this Council has not been afforded an opportunity to consider options for a return to what was a well understood and respected decision making system. This Council believes that in the interests of democracy, openness and transparency, members of this Council should ultimately be offered the prospect of debating and determining (in a free vote) whether it would wish to see a return to a traditional form of Committee based Governance. This Council further believes that this matter would benefit from detailed consideration and examination by Overview and Scrutiny who, by reporting back to the Council meeting on 6 th February 2013 would allow, should Council should so determine, the opportunity for implementation in the new Municipal year. This Council therefore resolves that consideration of options for return to a Committee based Governance system for Oldham Council be referred to Overview and Scrutiny and that they be required to report back with recommendations to the 6 th February 2012 Council meeting.

16 To note the Minutes of the following Joint Authority and Oldham Partnership meetings and the relevant spokespersons to respond to questions from Members (Pages 51 - 124)

(time limit 20 minutes):- Greater Manchester Waste Disposal 8th June 2012 Authority Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue 6th September 2012 Authority Greater Manchester Police Authority 23 rd August 2012 14 th September 2012

Transport for Greater Manchester 13 th July 2012 Committee 14 th September 2012

Association of Greater Manchester 31 st August 2012 Authorities Executive 28 th September 2012

Greater Manchester Combined 31 st August 2012 Authority 28 th September 2012

Peak District National Park Authority 6th July 2012 (AGM)

17 Update on Actions from Council (Pages 125 - 140)

18 The Nomination for the Civic Appreciation Award - Report of the Chief Executive (Pages 141 - 142)

19 Amendments to the Financial Procedure Rules and Introduction of Business Unit Finance/Contract Procedure Rules - Report of the Borough Treasurer (Pages 143 - 218)

20 Changes to Committee Appointments for the Municipal Year 2012/13 - Report of the Borough Solicitor (Pages 219 - 220)

21 Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) Regulations - Report of the Borough Solicitor (Pages 221 - 226)

22 The Municipal Calendar 2013-2015 - Report of the Borough Solicitor (Pages 227 - 256)

PROCEDURE FOR NOTICE OF MOTIONS NO AMENDMENT

MOTION – Mover of the Motion to MOVE

MOTION – Seconder of the Motion to SECOND – May reserve right to speak

DEBATE ON THE MOTION: Include Timings

MOVER of Motion – Right of Reply

VOTE – For/Against/Abstain

Declare outcome of the VOTE

RULE ON TIMINGS PROCEDURE FOR NOTICE OF MOTIONS (a) No Member shall speak longer than five minutes on any Motion or Amendment , or by way of question,WITH AMENDMENTobservation or reply, unless by consent of the MembersPROCEDURE of the Council FOR NOTICEpresent, hOFe/she MOTIONS is allowed an extension, in which case only one extension of One Minute shall be allowed. WITH AMENDMENT

(b) A Member replying to more than question will have up to five minutes to reply to each question. WITH AMENDMENT

MOTION – Mover of the Motion to MOVE

MOTION – Seconder of the Motion to SECOND – May reserve right to speak

AMENDMENT – Mover of the Amendment to MOVE

AMENDMENT – Seconder of the Amendment to SECOND

DEBATE on the Amendment For Timings - (See Overleaf)

AMENDMENT – Mover of Original Motion – Right of Reply

IF LOST –Declare AMENDMENT – Mover of Amendment – Lost Right of Reply

VOTE ON AMENDMENT ONLY – Call for any debate For/Against/Abstain – CARRIED/LOST on Original Motion and then Call upon Mover of Original IF CARRIED – Declare Carried Motion – Right of Reply Call for any debate on Substantive Motion as Amended and then Call upon Mover of Original Motion – Right of Reply VOTE – On Original Motion – For/Against/Abstain VOTE – ON SUBSTANTIVE MOTION as amended - For/Against/Abstain

Declare outcome of Declare Substantive Motion as amended the Vote Carried/Lost This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 4 COUNCIL 12/09/2012 at 6.00 pm

Present: The Mayor – Councillor O Chadderton

Councillors Akhtar, Alexander, Alcock, Ames, Azad, Ball, Bashforth, Battye, Beeley, Blyth, Briggs, Brownridge, O Chadderton, Dawson, Dean, Dearden, J Dillon, P Dillon, Fielding, Fletcher, Haque, Harkness, J Harrison, P Harrison, Heffernan, Hibbert, Hindle, Houle, Hudson, Hussain, Iqbal, Jabbar, Judge, Larkin, Malik, McCann, McDonald, McLaren, McMahon, Moores, Price, Qumer, Rehman, Roughley, Salamat, Sedgwick, Shah, Sheldon, Shuttleworth, Stretton, Sykes, Thompson, Toor, Ur-Rehman, Williams, Williamson and Wrigglesworth

1 QUESTIONS TO CABINET MEMBERS FROM THE PUBLIC AND COUNCILLORS ON WARD OR DISTRICT ISSUES The Mayor advised the meeting that the first item in open Council would be public question time. Questions had been received for Cabinet Members from members of the public and would be taken in order that they had been received. If the questioner was not present then the question would appear on screen in the Chamber.

The following questions had been submitted:

1. Question received from Barry Ratcliffe via facebook:

“I live on Putney Close, Opposite Oldham Hospital our street suffers from Hospital parking by staff, visitors and workmen from the hospital, the bin wagon regularly can’t get down the street hence missing bin collections, and emergency vehicles would not stand a chance. The council say its highways or police, and highways and police say it’s the council. Resident parking has been introduced off Sheepfoot Lane at the side of the hospital could the same be introduce on Putney Close and surrounding residential streets?”

Councillor Hibbert referred the response to Councillor Jabbar, Ward member who asked to respond. Councillor Jabbar informed that this issue had been ongoing for a number of years and Putney Close residents had been contacted on two occasions, but on both occasions there had not been enough support from residents. He further informed that he had been speaking to residents and a small survey had been completed which indicated most were now in support and he would organise a meeting.

2. Question received from Gemma 1981 via Twitter

“Any chance Sharples Hall Street lower can get alley gates. We’re having a lot of trouble with them.”

Page 1

Councillor Stretton, Cabinet Member for Neighbourhoods and Devolved Services, responded by saying that the question was not 100% clear, however, arrangements would be made to meet with residents to clarify if this was a request for alleygates and if so, this would go through consultation.

3. Question received from Susan Richardson via email:

“Are the ugly steel shores at the base of the grassland at the side of the new school going to be camouflaged? These are facing onto Broadway and at the moment look hideous. Also WHY could the new railings not have been continued up to Milton Drive? I think this is the least you could have done for us considering the disruption we have had to put up with.”

Councillor McDonald, Cabinet Member for Education and Safeguarding, responded by stating that the steel shores would be faced with timber and the railings fit in with design requirements and provide the required protection for school pupils and passers by.

4. Question received from Aaron Simmons via Facebook

“When will the much needed speed bumps or sleeping policemen on Waverly Street be put down due to the increase of speeding cars using the road to cut though and using speeds of 50mph + when the kids are out playing.”

Councillor David Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning responded by stating that during the last five years the police had recorded no injury accidents along the entire length of Waverly Street. The policy was not to install unless there was a record and current budget restraints stop the Council from spending money if there was no need identified. Councillor Hibbert suggested that Mr. Simmons contact the police if there were further accidents to ensure they are reported and they can be considered along with other priorities.

5. Question received from Stephen Hewitt via Facebook

“For the council meeting: With Oldham becoming a trial area for the Universal credit Digital by default, why is the council not embracing the Go-On Oldham campaign which is trying to engage residents by getting them online through digital champion network.”

Councillor McDonald, Cabinet Member for Education and Safeguarding, responded that the Library Services held two sessions in June and July and had been arranged in conjunction with Steve Hewitt, Union Learning Co-ordinator. The Library Service intended to roll this initiative out to other libraries, building upon the two pilot programmes. This work had been supported by Digital Champions.

Page 2

6. Question received from Dave Murphy via email

“Following on from Simon Martin's question to the Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning at the July Council meeting, regarding charging blood donors for parking at the Queen Elizabeth, Cllr Hibbert responded by stating that "it was inappropriate for donors to be charged for parking and once a resolution issue was found it would be implemented.

As a blood donor, living in Shaw, which has no facilities to donate and the closest town being Royton, working close to Oldham Town Centre, the QE Hall would be ideal.

Could the Cabinet member explain where he is up to with this issue so that this valuable service is not disrupted because of car parking charges?

I find it shocking that you had to pay to park and donate to a service that saves lives.”

Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning thanked Mr. Murphy for his question. He had previously responded that this was unacceptable and stood by that. The Integrated Care Centre had a car park and he asked the questioner to contact the centre if they would agree to free car parking for those giving blood and if he was unsuccessful, to contact Councillor Hibbert who would look into it.

7. Question from Janet Smith via email

“I live in an area where there is a high level of antisocial behaviour. It is difficult to report to the police or the council as the people who carry out this antisocial behaviour will typically deny it, and it's difficult to catch them committing the behaviour. Even so, property, community areas and vehicles are regularly vandalised and damaged. This leaves law abiding people reluctant to report this behaviour as they can't 'prove' who has done it, even if they have seen them.

Would the Council consider placing CCTV in areas such as Forest Street and Alton Street in order collect evidence on this anti social behaviour? Are there any other measures the Council can carry out to help law abiding residents feel safe and secure?”

Councillor Jean Stretton, Cabinet Member for Neighbourhoods and Devolved Services responded by explaining that Oldham Community Safety and Cohesion Partnership deploys a range of tactics to reduce crime and disorder. These included alleygating, youth engagement projects, crime prevention, enforcement operations and the deployment of CCTV.

Page 3

A problem solving model known as SARA was applied to identify the most appropriate tactic and this was based in part on reported levels of crime and disorder and it was essential that members of the community had the confidence to report issues to either GMP, OMBC, CRIMESTOPPERS or the third party reporting process Stop Hate UK. The information from all these separate reporting processes was fed into the joint Police and OMBC Analytical Team housed in the Civic Centrem where hot spots, crime patterns, vulnerable people etc were identified and plans were developed to address each threat to community safety.

Over the last 12 months on these streets there had been a total of 12 calls for service relating to 'rowdy or inconsiderate behaviour' a proportion being related to neighbour disputes or single household issues not unknown offender anti-social behaviour taking place in public areas. To identify the full extent of the situation on these streets she informed that she would arrange for a 'neighbourhood survey' to be undertaken where residents experience of crime and disorder would be examined and an appropriate response be developed.

8. Question from Steve from Fitton Hill submitted via email

“When will we see a cinema/entertainment complex in Oldham? We have had enough promises over the years.

How about Alexandra retail park / old warehouse land. This could be utilised .”

Councillor McMahon, Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Strategic Projects and External Relations responded that excellent progress was being made towards a 1000 seat cinema in the Old Town Hall which would go to Planning Committee the following week. It was anticipated that work would commence next year and that there had been significant interest from cinema operators and restaurateurs. The cinema itself would not turn around the town centre but would be part of a catalyst along with facelift improvements to Union Street.

9. Question submitted from Steven Ferguson via Twitter

“Patience is running low, how much longer will the traffic chaos last? Where is the metro install up to? Dates Please?”

Councillor David Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning stated that the Metrolink tram installation was in two phases and the line had opened as far as Oldham. The phase 3 was anticipated to be completed later this year. Phase 3b would go through Union Street. Tracks were still to be completed in some sections and overhead lines to carry the power were still to be installed. The town centre would see disruption until 2014. Page 4

Some difficult work had been brought forward for completion during the school holidays. The Council was working with Transport for Greater Manchester to minimise disruption, however some incidents could not be planned for. As time passes, disruption would reduce.

10. Question from Amelia via Twitter

“What are u doing about challenging homophobia in schools?”

Councillor Hugh McDonald, Cabinet Member for Education and Safeguarding stated that a presentation from the Youth Council later on this agenda would highlight bullying as an issue. The Council was working closely with partners to prevent bullying and not just physical but also internet bullying.

11. Question from Steven Ferguson via Twitter

“When will the regeneration of Derker restart? The roads are awful, are we to wait until houses are built to get decent roads?”

Councillor David Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning stated that with the disappointing withdrawal of HMR funding which had caused problem, the Council did have a £10 million investment programme to improve roads across the borough and work had been undertaken on arterial routes including Ripponden Road. Further works were currently under consideration.

12. Question submitted by Steven Ferguson via Twitter

“Why are the bay markings at the market hall car park not being renewed?”

Councillor David Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning stated that the relining of the bays at Tommyfield Market had been identified and would be programmed for later this year with similar works programmes.

13. Question submitted from Jordan “Chaddy” Chadwick via Facebook

“Why when students/school members started this week did Mumps and Manchester roundabout go down to on lane? Surely to stop congestion this should of been done the week before? This is bad communication with Oldham council and the team doing the metro links. Will there be better organisation from now one with the metro service??”

Councillor David Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning referred to his previous response to Mr. Ferguson and added that over the previous weekend Page 5

there had been extensive work undertaken. It was accepted that there were problems and there were lessons being learned along the way. Information was being sent out as fast as possible.

14. Question received from Michael Cunniffe via Twitter

“Hi, Why is Oldham going like a huge car park. Is there nothing u can do to easy the car park and get Oldham back like a town.”

The Mayor announced that this had already been answered in previous responses.

15. Question received from Shaw Parish Councillor Dave Murphy via email

“When I sat in the gallery seating at the Full Council meeting back in May, Cllr Howard Sykes asked for justification in the Leader's pay increase. The Council Leader avoided the question like the plague. Therefore, as Cllr McMahon did not answer the question appropriately, I am going to ask him again and again and again until he does. Just because Councillors are entitled to remuneration for their role as Community Leaders, as well as any Special Responsibility Allowance, it does not mean that they have to claim it. Therefore, The Leader, could have chosen not to take the 20% increase or even just taken part of it. WHICH HE HAS !

All this while the other 59 members of Council in this room have taken a 10% decrease in their allowance, together with being asked not to claim expenses.

So...... my question is... Could the Council Leader explain what aditional duties he has taken on to justifty a 20% increase or just shy of 5000 pounds pay award. Jim claims we are all in together, but does not lead by example.” Councillor McMahon, Leader of the Council responded that the Leader’s allowance had not increased and the report made that clear. The amount was an additional payment as a result of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority which is a statutory authority for work undertaken. This was the same as those other statutory functions such as Police and Fire. As with special responsibility allowances there was a voluntary 10% reduction. Councillor McMahon also clarified that he did not set the pay but instead set by an independent body. He highlighted that Oldham Council received scrutiny from the parish councils but the work of the parish councils did not get scrutinised.

Page 6

The following questions were submitted by Councillors on Ward or District matters:

1. Councillor Sheldon to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning “I would like to ask councillor Hibbert to assure full council that the sale of a piece of land called ‘Pitt Hill’ in Uppermill will be deferred or withdrawn, until a decision has been made on the future of Saddleworth School. I understand that the decision to relocate Saddleworth School or extend the facility on the current site may not be made until 2014/15. In the event that funding is granted to extend the School on the existing site, this piece of land will be an invaluable asset to any future development. The School and grounds with the exception of this land at Pitt Hill is land locked. I would also like to ask that as a matter of procedure in the future, the asset management team consult with ward councillors where large parcels of land are to be released for development.” Councillor Hibbert responded and assured that with regard to the second part of the question that this was the case. He had instructed officers that on substantial development of any kind to liaise with ward members and consult to come to a mutually agreeable approach. The development agreement had lapsed and the land had reverted back to the Council. Designs had been developed solely for marketing purposes. Prior to any marketing, consultation would take place with members. Saddleworth School had been designated to receive funds, however, the full details were yet to be finalised.

2. Councillor Heffernan to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning

“The Oldham & Rochdale Street Lighting PFI is causing a great deal of public anger.

Can the Leader of the Council or the responsible Cabinet Member advise members what steps are being taken to ensure that E.on and their sub-contractors are willing to respond to householders justifiable concerns regarding the siting of new lighting columns. Some householders are experiencing distress caused by the arrogant attitude shown by staff and sub-contractors.”

Councillor Hibbert stated that the PFI had been in place for 12 months. New energy efficiency lights were being installed. Independent satisfaction levels were monitored and responses so far had been good or excellent. E-on was responsible for resolving issues and it was not always possible to find a solution that everyone agreed to. On

Page 7

these occasions a detailed explanation should be applied. Service failures were met with severe financial penalties.

3. Councillor Harkness to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning

“At the last council meeting I asked about a regular maintenance scheme and asked that the blocked gullies be addressed. I thank the cabinet member for his intervention to begin to address some of the issues I have raised. I sense that there is no set programme and it is mainly reactive. In areas of Saddleworth we had some further flooding which is hampered by a lack of a maintenance programme &dig out teams with budget cuts meaning it is impossible to respond to emergencies let alone continue maintenance. More needs to be done on this. Only One team now is available to cover the whole of the Metropolitan Borough I respect that such a down pour means some flash floods are inevitable however, this seems to be getting worse. It does seem that the verges and blocked gullies are part of the issue. The scale at Churchfields in Dobcross resembled a river and residents had been flooded out. The Swan in Dobcross was also forced to close again. I was pleased with my dealings with the staff and management for their intervention. I requested a team to come in the evening which they did. They then arrived the next day to address some of the issues on Churchfields.” which was good to see. I was told that drainage issues had been identified here previously and a plan was in order. Could you confirm what plans there are to address the drainage issues at Churchfield Other areas such as Delph New Road ,Woods Lane, Ridings Court experienced difficulties too. Part was due to the huge downpour but I am told known problems have not been resolved making the situation much worse. Can the cabinet member confirm that these issues will be addressed, where necessary collaboration is sought with United Utilities and I am kept informed of the progress.”

Councillor Hibbert thanked Councillor Harkness for the acknowledgement of work and co-operation made. Councillor Hibbert informed that 6000 gullies had been cleaned in Saddleworth, there were 46,000 in total in the borough. Every gully was cleaned every year. The provision of the service had been re-engineered increased productivity and provided a better use of resources. Drainage issues on Churchill fields were well known and Councillor Hibbert was more than happy to discuss.

4. Councillor McCann to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning

“Could Cllr Hibbert the cabinet member for Housing, Transport and Planning advise whether the council is yet in a position to enforce the terms of the planning permission Page 8

granted some months ago regarding: Wellihole Farm, Greenfield and assure residents that the terms and limitations on numbers and use will be enforced.”

Councillor Hibbert stated that PA/331248/11 was approved with conditions by the planning committee on 07/12/2011 subject to conditions. The application was made on a retrospective basis for the change of use of the site to a caravan and camping site. The subsequent condition discharge application was approved on 13/08/2012 and therefore the conditions applied by the planning committee were now enforceable should a breach of these occur.

5. Councillor Rod Blyth to Councillor Jean Stretton, Cabinet Member for Neighbourhoods and Devolved Services

“Can the relevant Member please tell me what is happening to the repairs of alleygates as there is not a budget for it now. I have constituents who have waiting over a month for repairs. It seems senseless spending money on alleygates when they are ineffective as they cannot be locked.”

Councillor Stretton responded by outlining that the budget for alleygate repairs had remained unchanged at £50,000 per year and the average turn around for a straight forward repair was 5 days. There could be delays if a specific gate was being deliberately damaged, for example gluing the locks or blocking the retaining hole with stones, and specialist bespoke engineering solutions had to be developed. She asked Councillor Blyth for the details of the specific gate that had not been repaired and she would refer it to officers.

6. Councillor Briggs to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning

Councillor Briggs asked what was happening with regard to the Failsworth District Centre parking scheme to alleviate the problems and street lighting maintenance. He had reported on several occasions, problems with street lights in the area, the target timescale for repairs should be three days, he had reported 12 to 14 lamps but none had achieved the target.

Councillor Hibbert responded that the car parking arrangements in Failsworth were the responsibility of the stores / developers. The new street lamps being installed needed to be left on while programming took place. If there were specific issues, Councillor Hibbert should be advised.

Councillor McMahon, Leader of the Council, responded to the issue of the car park. He thanked Councillor Briggs for his question. The original layout was designed to slow traffic, pedestrian issues had not been specifically considered in the design and the Council recognised the Page 9

issue. Discussions were ongoing with the landowners and tenants to get agreement to a scheme which accommodated most. A ward meeting would be called on the issue.

7. Councillor Roughley to Councillor Hibbert, Cabinet Member for Housing, Transport and Planning

Councillor Roughley explained that the Street Lighting scheme issues were more serious that previously implied. Councillor Roughley had had a site meeting with scheme representatives. He had received complaints from residents which included the placement of the columns being situated in front of people’s drives and windows and disruption to cables to houses. Parish Councillors had faced abuse when approaching the contractors to raise issues. A review of the relationship was needed as there would be issues in every ward.

Councillor Hibbert responded that this needed to be addressed. The siting of columns at the rear of the kerbs versus the front of the kerb reduced hazards to motorists. Councillor Hibbert stated that if so requested, the matter would be referred to Scrutiny where relevant objections and concerns could be resolved.

2 TO RECEIVE APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor A Chadderton and Newton.

3 TO ORDER THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL HELD ON 11TH JULY 2012 BE SIGNED AS A CORRECT RECORD RESOLVED – That the Minutes of the Council meeting held on 11 th July 2012, be approved as a correct record.

4 TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN ANY MATTER TO BE DETERMINED AT THE MEETING There were no declarations of interest received. 5 TO DEAL WITH MATTERS WHICH THE MAYOR CONSIDERS TO BE URGENT BUSINESS The Mayor informed the meeting that no items of urgent business had been received.

6 TO RECEIVE COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL The Mayor made reference to the recent death of Councillor Glenys Butterworth and Councillors McMahon, Ames, Bashforth and Williamson all spoke in remembrance of Councillor Butterworth.

Page 10

The Mayor also made reference to the recent death of former Councillor Ian Hilton and Councillors Battye and J Dillon spoke in remembrance of former Councillor Hilton.

Council held a Minutes Silence in memory of Councillor Butteworth and former Councillor Hilton.

7 TO RECEIVE AND NOTE PETITIONS RECEIVED RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL The Mayor informed the meeting that no petitions had been received for noting by the Council.

8 OUTSTANDING BUSINESS FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING 1. Councillor Hindle MOVED and Councillor McCann SECONDED the following motion:

This Council notes the important work being undertaken by the Coalition Government in tackling the empty homes problem in this country and addressing the legacy left by the last Labour Government of over 3/4 million empty homes.

This Council also welcomes recent announcements made by Liberal Democrat MP Andrew Stunell, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at Communities and Local Government, on the introduction of the Empty Homes Fund, the New Homes Bonus and also the new Empty Homes Premium which will change the rules on Council tax discount for vacant properties, potentially generating additional income for Councils like Oldham to invest in keeping communities together by bringing long term empty homes back into use rather than demolish.

This Council further notes that the initial target of the Empty Homes initiatives of bringing 3,300 homes back into use has been massively exceeded and, current estimates indicate that £215m of investment will ensure a total of 11,200 homes brought back into use, with further investment to come.

This Council therefore resolves that the Chief Executive be requested to write to the Minster

(a) Welcoming the recent initiatives on the Empty Homes Fund, New Homes Bonus and the Empty Homes Premium all of which will assist Oldham Council in tackling the current homes shortages.

(b) Urging the investment of the remaining Government money available under the Empty Homes Fund as a matter of priority.

Councillor Hindle sought Council’s permission to MOVE an amendment to the original motion due to the Cabinet reshuffle to add the word “former” after MP Andrew Stunnell for correctness.

On being put the vote the AMENDMENT to the MOTION was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 11

Councillor Hibbert spoke against the motion.

Councillor Hindle exercised his right of reply.

It was MOVED that the Motion be put to the vote. On being put to the vote FOURTEEN votes were cast IN FAVOUR of the Motion and FORTY TWO votes were cast AGAINST and ONE ABSTENTION. The Motion was therefore LOST.

9 LEADER AND CABINET QUESTION TIME The Leader of the Opposition, Councillor Sykes raised the following questions:

1. Replacement Roman Catholic School

The controversial late opening of the Roman Catholic school, when was the Leader aware the contract was in danger, what did he do and when and why was it so late in the day to address the problem since the contract was let a number of years ago.

Councillor McMahon responded by clarifying two points raised in the question. No one was happy with the delay and wanted this resolved as a matter of urgency. This was brought to his attention very late in the day. He had no more notice than the parents. Confirmation had been received from the contractor that all was going well, but they had brought more workmen on site. On behalf of the Council he apologised for the inconveniences caused. Politically more could not have been done as the contractor was monitored. The school would be fit for purpose, one of the best in the country, fit for the next generation with a fantastic facility. This would be fantastic for education in Oldham.

2. Publication of Council

The attention to detail and openness and transparency were questioned with the omission of information such as the Cabinet Minutes in the published Council agenda. Would the Leader not agree that to allow such errors to slip through the net reflected badly on the Council and that he and his colleagues should take responsibility for ensuring that this particular document was correct before publication?

Councillor McMahon responded that the Council was more open and transparent than ever, more people were engaging the Council than ever before and residents were raising issues that affect them. The minutes had not gone in the minute book but they were available on line and circulated. He questioned the relevance of this question to members of the public and if Councillor Sykes did not have three legitimate questions to ask.

Page 12

3. Metrolink

Concerns were expressed regarding safety concerns at Mumps. It was a disgrace that these issues had not been anticipated as it was known it was coming. Can there be assurances when similar works were done that passenger safety would be addressed with stations and stops?

Councillor McMahon responded that Transport for Greater Manchester delivered the scheme. No-one was pleased how the Metrolink works had gone. Roadworks and diversion signs did not work effectively, it was a complex piece of work with not just Metrolink works but also utilities work that had been undertaken. The town centre was virtually being rebuilt and that could not be done without disruption. No-one was more fierce than himself and Councillor Hibbert by saying to the appropriate agencies that this had not been good enough. When other stations were planned, issues would be addressed.

The Minority Opposition Leader, Councillor Hudson, raised the following question:

Communications

As a backbencher, he expressed that the Council said everything through a press release to the Chronicle instead of being debated at Council. His question related to communications in that the public were not receiving proper responses for a wide variety of services and even he was finding it increasingly difficult. Were we progressing to make sure that our communication skills with the public were improving?

Councillor McMahon responded about working together. Two issues raised by councillors previously were genuine issues with no press release associated with them. Open council was about all councillors stepping up to the mark to assist people in their wards. With regard to responses, if it was a regular occurrence, it would be disappointing as a visit had recently been made to the Contact Centre where 5,000 calls per week were received. He also referred to Council responsibility but also the wider community responsibility with a common sense point of view.

The following questions were raised, advanced notice of which had been given:

Question from Councillor Shuttleworth to Councillor Philip Harrison, Cabinet Member for Social Services and Community Health.

Limecroft “Councillor Harrison - This Council recognises that free speech is essential within a democracy and that everyone has the right to be heard. However, Council also recognises that when statements are

Page 13

made that are, or may be regarded as, misleading, that such statements should be challenged.

In view of the statement made by Councillor Allcock in relation to Limecroft Residential Home at the Council Meeting held on Wednesday 11 July 2012 in relation to; 1. the expenditure incurred on and since the re-opening of the Home, and; 2. the level of occupancy Could the Cabinet Member responsible for Adult Social Services provide a full and frank update on the Home, with particular emphasis on these two points.”

Councillor P. Harrison expressed sadness at this being brought back to the Chamber. He responded that it brought unrest amongst those people and their families who live in that part of Failsworth, Oldham, Hollinwood and Chadderton that place their families in Limecroft. He asked that the opposition find time to visit Limecroft and meet with the Director who can provide information which show the positive way in which Limecroft was managed. The costs of Limecroft refurbishment were detailed. The occupancy levels were also referred to and were likely to remain at full capacity.

The following questions were raised by Members at the meeting:

Question from Councillor Alcock to Councillor P. Harrison, Cabinet Member for Social Services and Community Health who asked about the cost of demolishing the facility and how £403,000 had been spent subsidising it. How much was the cost of the new premises to replace it.

Councillor McMahon responded that the centre had reopened, and residents were wanting to use it. There was a need in the community. The people of Oldham had a proper respite centre.

RESOLVED – That the questions raised and responses given be noted.

10 TO NOTE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF THE CABINET HELD ON THE UNDERMENTIONED DATES, INCLUDING THE ATTACHED LIST OF URGENT KEY DECISIONS TAKEN SINCE THE LAST MEETING OF THE COUNCIL, AND TO RECEIVE ANY QUESTIONS OR OBSERVATIONS ON ANY ITEMS WITHIN THE MINUTES FROM MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET, AND RECEIVE RESPONSES FROM CABINET MEMBERS The following Cabinet Minutes were submitted:

25 th June 2012 23 rd July 2012

Page 14

Councillor Thompson withdrew her question given in advance regarding Cabinet minutes.

The following questions and observations regarding the Cabinet Minutes were raised at the meeting:

1. Councillor Judge to Councillor McMahon, Leader of the Council, regarding Page 11, Item 10, ‘Royton Town Centre Regeneration’, asked about a quality supermarket for Royton Precinct.

Councillor McMahon responded that Royton District Centre was extremely important and the shopping offer was not as it could be. The market could be better. Councillor McMahon confirmed there had been meetings with two major supermarkets and interest was buoyant and hard work would ensure a quality scheme.

2. Councillor Blyth to Councillor McDonald, Cabinet Member for Education and Safeguarding, regarding Page 7, Item 4, which referenced a public question on the deep dive pool asked questions in relation to the funding and consultation.

Councillor McDonald responded that he had met with divers and would be undertaking additional consultation as well as discussing the issues with contractors through the procurement process.

3. Councillor Alcock to Councillor McMahon, Leader of the Council, regarding Page 14, Item 10, ‘Royton Town Centre Regeneration’, asked questions relating to resolutions 2, 3, 6 and 11 specifically about the virement from the 2012/13 capital programme, what was going to be missed and the grounds for the CPOs.

Councillor McMahon responded that this was a priority. Each area would be dealt with differently to understand the issues and potential settlements if needed. The costs were there for transparency and the cost of doing nothing would mean further decline for the precinct. Retail was a major employment sector in the borough. Commercial contracts would form part of the negotiations and where necessary would be private.

4. Councillor Williamson to Councillor McDonald, Cabinet Member for Education and Safeguarding, regarding Page 7, Item 4, which referenced a public question on the deep dive pool asked about the petition regarding saving Shaw and Crompton Pool.

Councillor McDonald responded said the petition had been reported to Council and officers were dealing with it.

5. Councillor Thompson to Councillor Jabbar, Cabinet Member for Finance, Human Resources and Strategic Partnerships regarding page 4, Item 11, “Council Performance Report – Page 15

Quarter 4 (2011-2012)” and made an observation that out of 9 areas of work only 3 reached an acceptable standard. She reflected on the new corporate objectives but no performance framework was in place.

Councillor Jabbar responded that the severe cuts in the budget would impact on performance. The issue with the indicators was being addressed. He referred to the accounts being closed in record time and that despite massive reduction the Council was punching above its weight.

RESOLVED – That:

1. The Minutes of the Cabinet meetings held on 25 th June 2012 and 23 rd July 2012 be noted. 2. The questions put forward at the meeting and the responses given be noted. 3. The observations and the responses be noted.

11 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION BUSINESS 1. Councillor Bashforth MOVED and Councillor Ball SECONDED the following motion:

“This Council calls on the MoD and the Chief of the General Staff to reconsider their plans to disband the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, one of the best manned battalions in the army. The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers and it’s predecessor the Lancashire Fusiliers has a long history of recruiting from the Oldham area. The disbanding of the 2nd Battalion will result in loyal and well-trained fusiliers from this fully manned battalion being posted to other less successful battalions that cannot recruit or retain their own troops. This council calls on the MoD and Chief of General Staff to instead support the success and leadership shown by the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers in recruiting, training and retaining loyal soldiers.

This Council further calls on the government to act to save the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, in recognition of its proud history and the heroism of its servicemen.”

Councillor Sedgwick spoke in support of the motion. Councillor McMahon spoke in support of the motion. Councillor Bashforth reserved his right of reply.

On being put to the vote the Motion was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

RESOLVED – That:

This Council calls on the MoD and the Chief of the General Staff to reconsider their plans to disband the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, one of the best manned battalions in the army. The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers and it’s predecessor the Lancashire Fusiliers has a long history of recruiting from the Page 16

Oldham area. The disbanding of the 2nd Battalion will result in loyal and well-trained fusiliers from this fully manned battalion being posted to other less successful battalions that cannot recruit or retain their own troops. This council calls on the MoD and Chief of General Staff to instead support the success and leadership shown by the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers in recruiting, training and retaining loyal soldiers.

This Council further calls on the government to act to save the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, in recognition of its proud history and the heroism of its servicemen.

2. Councillor Shah MOVED and Councillor Price SECONDED the following motion:

However, there is much more to do. As a result, this Council welcomes the creation of an Oldham Energy Co-operative which supports the Council’s co-operative and campaigning values. By doing this the council will create the Oldham Energy Tariff which will focus on fair energy for everybody.

This tariff will focus not just on those householders on direct debit schemes, but by working with the council’s existing energy providers and partners, provide a fairer deal for Oldham residents, using an innovative approach to lift residents in our most vulnerable communities out of fuel poverty.”

AMENDMENT

Councillor Heffernan MOVED and Councillor Roughley SECONDED the following amendment:

Paragraph three, lines four and five – delete the words “in our most vulnerable communities” and add after the word “lift”, the words “our vulnerable”

The motion to read: -

“The Council welcomes the existing continually hard and successful work that is done to reduce fuel poverty in Oldham. Through the affordable Warmth Strategy we have brought about programmes such as the Toasty Oldham campaign. However, there is much more to do. As a result, this Council welcomes the creation of an Oldham Energy Co-operative which supports the Council’s co-operative and campaigning values. By doing this the Council will create the Oldham Energy Tariff which will focus on fair energy for everybody. This tariff will focus not just on those householders on direct debit schemes, but by working with the council’s existing energy providers and partners, provide a

Page 17

fairer deal for Oldham residents, using an innovative approach to lift our vulnerable residents out of fuel poverty.”

Councillor Shah exercised her right of reply and accepted the AMENDMENT.

Councillor Jabbar spoke in support of the substantive motion. Councillor Thompson spoke in support of the substantive motion.

A vote was then taken on the substantive motion as amended.

On being put to the vote the substantive motion was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

RESOLVED: That the Council welcomes the existing continually hard and successful work that is done to reduce fuel poverty in Oldham. Through the affordable Warmth Strategy we have brought about programmes such as the Toasty Oldham campaign. However, there is much more to do. As a result, this Council welcomes the creation of an Oldham Energy Co-operative which supports the Council’s co-operative and campaigning values. By doing this the Council will create the Oldham Energy Tariff which will focus on fair energy for everybody. This tariff will focus not just on those householders on direct debit schemes, but by working with the council’s existing energy providers and partners, provide a fairer deal for Oldham residents, using an innovative approach to lift our vulnerable residents out of fuel poverty. 12 NOTICE OF OPPOSITION BUSINESS 1. Councillor Harkness MOVED and Councillor Beeley SECONDED the following motion:

“This Council expresses dismay at the Prime Minister’s recent comments outlining an intention to withdraw all housing benefit for the under 25s. Council acknowledges that schemes such as the Work Experience Programme and the Youth Contract give opportunities for young people to gain skills but feels that the Prime Minister’s comments undermine this work, only add extra pressure and do nothing to support young people in their ambitions.

Council recognises that it is difficult for young people to gain employment at the current time and feels that they should have reassurance that there will be financial support if required.

Council therefore requests the Chief Executive to write to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to express concern at the suggestion and to ask for reassurances that proposals to cut housing benefit for the under 25s will not be implemented.”

Councillor Battye spoke in support of the motion Councillor Hibbert spoke in support of the motion Councillor Houle spoke in support of the motion

It was MOVED that the Motion be put to the vote, and was CARRIED unanimously.

Page 18

Councillor Harkness exercised his right of reply.

On being put to the vote the motion was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

RESOLVED – That the Chief Executive write to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to express concern at the suggestion and to ask for reassurances that proposals to cut housing benefit for the under 25s would not be implemented.

2. Councillor Thompson MOVED and Councillor McCann SECONDED the following motion:

“This Council welcomes the Coalition Government's move to extend to businesses the facility to reclaim mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance. Previously it could only be claimed by individuals.

Small and medium sized enterprises are a vital driver of our local economy and many could potentially benefit from this measure to recover much-needed cash.

This Council, therefore, should assist local businesses by publicising this recent change so that those who have previously been refused, or who are unaware of their right to claim, can benefit from this change in policy.”

Without further discussion the MOTION was put to the vote and was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

RESOLVED – That this Council welcomes the Coalition Government's move to extend to businesses the facility to reclaim mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance. Previously it could only be claimed by individuals.

Small and medium sized enterprises are a vital driver of our local economy and many could potentially benefit from this measure to recover much-needed cash.

13 YOUTH COUNCIL The Council received a presentation from the Youth Council, titled ‘Youth Council Priority Projects for 2012-2014’.

The representatives from the Youth Council outlined the three priority themes which were Bullying, Employment Opportunities and “I Love Me” Campaign. The Youth Council’s aims were to work with the Council and partner agencies to review anti-bullying help in schools and colleges, promote self-esteem and build on the Olympic legacy. The “I Love Me” Campaign was inspired by the Page 19

Love Where You Live campaign and would include the encouragement of young people to help out in their communities and challenge negative stereotypes. With regard to youth unemployment, the Youth Council would address the opportunity to further career progression, link to local and national campaigns, the British Youth Council and would also make a resource available to young people for assistance in gaining employment through increased work experience offers. A detailed action plan would be developed and more consultation would be carried out.

The Mayor thanked the Youth Council for their presentation.

Councillor McMahon commented on the quality of the presentation given and the links to the Council. He asked that the Cabinet Members with the links to the themes, Councillors Akhtar, McDonald and Brownridge work with the Youth Council to match priorities and to assist in the delivery of the Youth Council’s aims.

Councillor Hudson also commented on the excellent ideas put forward and to request help when needed.

Councillor Sykes thanked the Youth Council for their presentation and offered the assistance of the Shadow Cabinet Members. The ideas brought forward by the Youth Council could feed into the District Partnerships.

RESOLVED – That the presentation be noted.

Council AGREED to suspend Council Procedure Rules for a period of 30 minutes to enable discussions to take place on the remaining Items of Business. 14 TO NOTE THE MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING JOINT AUTHORITY AND OLDHAM PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS AND THE RELEVANT SPOKESPERSONS TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS Minutes of the Joint Authorities were submitted as follows:

Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue 21 st June 2012 Authority

Greater Manchester Police Authority 22 nd June 2012 13 th July 2012

Transport for Greater Manchester 15 th June 2012 (AGM) Committee 15 th June 2012

Association of Greater Manchester 29 th June 2012 Authorities Executive 27 th July 2012

Greater Manchester Combined Authority 29 th June 2012 27 th July 2012

The following questions and observations were raised in relation to the Joint Authority Minutes:

Page 20

1. Councillor Harkness referred to the Minutes of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority held on 27 July 2012, page 92, Minute 40/12, ‘Northern Hub and Railway Funding 2014 - 2019’, and asked a question relating to concerns of what the Borough would receive from the Northern Hub, there was one station currently at Greenfield and there were proposals for opening the station at Diggle. A survey had been completed but not heard the results. Could an update be provided?

Councillor Dean responded that there was pressure on TfGM and the consultation had revealed interesting issues including the number of people that travel to Leeds from Oldham. Councillors would be pursuing to ensure Oldham gets a good deal.

2. Councillor Hindle referred to the Minutes of the Transport for Greater Manchester Committee held on 15 June 2012, page 45, Minute 12/02 b.), ‘Metrolink to Oldham Mumps’, and asked for the further details about the extension of the line to Shaw and Rochdale and when the line would be opening.

Councillor Dean responded that a commitment had been made for the line to open in the autumn. Pressure was being applied by TfGM and Oldham Council to complete the works as soon as possible.

3. Councillor McCann referred to the Minutes of the Transport for Greater Manchester Committee held on 15 June 2012, pages 54/55, Minute 12/17, ‘DFT Fares and Ticketing Review” and asked about the provision of the multi-modal ticket across the conurbation. Was the authority pressing for a “through” ticket and was there a threat of refranchising? He sought assurance that local authorities were aware.

Councillor Dean responded that something new needed to be deve