Griffin's Capitol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Griffin's Capitol GRIFFIN’S CAPITOL IT’S PLACE IN THE DESIGN OF CANBERRA AND THE CONNECTION WITH THE IDEAS OF LOUIS SULLIVAN Rosemarie Elizabeth Willett March 2009 A Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Built Environment by Research ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the valued contribution to the management of my thesis by my supervisor Professor Robert Freestone, Planning Program, Faculty of Built Environment, UNSW, and co supervisor Professor Jon Lang, Architecture Program. I also wish to acknowledge advice from the late Professor Paul Reid and from Professor James Weirick, Urban Development and Design, Faculty of Built Environment, UNSW. Professor Dustin Griffin, the Department of English, New York University assisted me with introductions during my Chicago study tour in 2005. I feel honoured by the interest shown in the examination of my thesis by American Professor Paul Kruty, University of Illinois, and thank him for his advice and encouragement to perfect detail. At the Faculty of Built Environment UNSW, the Director of Research Students, Associate Professor Patrick Zou, his administrative assistant, Chrisanthi Emmanouilidis, and Built Environment Computer Unit have provided valued assistance. For my research I am indebted to Andrew Sergeant and the team in the Petherick Room at the Australian National Library, to the staff of the National Archives of Australia and to Mary McDonell, UNSW library. I have been encouraged by the Griffin Society, Canberra Chapter, Louise Dann, Fayne Mench, Haddon Spurgeon and Christopher Bettle. Rosemarie Willett. CONTENTS ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION 1-2 8 SET IN CHICAGO: CHAPTER 1 29-71 DESIGNING THE CAPITOL, FOCUS OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL CITY CHAPTER 2 72-108 LOUIS SULLIVAN AND HIS IDEAS CHA PTER 3 109-146 THE GRIFFINS, THE CHICAGO PROGRESSIVES AND SULLIVAN’S KINDERGARTEN SET IN AUSTRALIA: CHAPTER 4 147- 182 THE STRUGGLE FOR AN IDEAL CHA PTER 5 183-213 THE STRUGGLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OFTHE IDEAL CONNECTIONS CHAPTER 6: 214-248 CONNECTIONS, THE CAPITOL AS SIGNIFIER CONCLUSION 249-257 BIBLIOGRAPHY 258-269 INTRODUCTION Walter Burley Griffin is widely known to Australians in association with the national capital, Canberra, and specifically acknowledged in the naming of Lake Burley Griffin. While many ordinary Australians know that Walter Burley Griffin won the Federal Capital Competition and was the original designer of Canberra, most have no idea that he planned something other than Parliament House for Capital Hill. After European settlement, Capital Hill was first named Mt Kurrajong, after the native Kurrajong trees which grew there, then named Capitol Hill by Griffin and later renamed Capital Hill by planners in the Federal Public Service.1 Those who knew Canberra before the construction of Parliament House, remember Capital Hill as bush covered, with a scenic lookout and a flag mast carrying the Australian flag. Few know of the building, conceptualized for Capitol Hill, which Griffin named the Capitol. The immediate idea of a Capitol is as the locus of political power exemplified in the Capitols of the United States of America. In the United States there are 51 cities that have Capitols and they usually house the government’s lawmakers.2 Griffin said the Capitol was not purely an American idea and referred to the Capitol at Rome. In the Roman Republic this was the Roman equivalent of the Greek acropolis or upper city – a gathering place for the citizens on occasions of great importance. Although the Capitol has slipped from the public mind and is not generally associated with Griffin’s design, this thesis engages Griffin’s plan with the Capitol. It is believed that this engagement shows the plan in a different light. Engagement, it is argued, shows that Griffin’s Capitol was the focus of an organic plan and the signifier of democracy, an organic values system which Chicago architect Louis Sullivan referred to as ‘Natures law for man’. In planning a city for a democracy, the beauty of an organic plan is that functional relationships are determined by human needs and respect for the natural environment, not dictated by powerful sectors to promote their interests and raise their profiles. Griffin’s organic plan was democratic in essence. The Capitol was arguably the critical concept of Griffin’s life’s work for its impact as the signifier of the vision which inspired his Federal Capital plan and his 1 struggle for its implementation.3 The vision interpreted the needs and purposes of Australia’s national capital, but subscribed to a set of ideals in so doing. Griffin as a young man renounced the processes for architectural design taught in the Schools, which he referred to as ‘the mill’. He accepted Louis Sullivan’s retraining of the mind with ‘nature as teacher’ and refocused his professional development on an individual, ideologically democratic and organic architecture. Sullivan’s architectural theory encompassed three main areas of thought: the nature of architecture as an art which reflected society, but could also influence it; the organic process of creative thinking for architectural design; and the development of a new democratic architecture for America, which would reflect the organic growth of a perfected form of democracy in the individual and society. Griffin took his professional direction from this architectural theory, extended the theory on the much larger scale of town planning, and perfected its application in the design of Canberra. In the thesis, the writings of Griffin and Sullivan are sought out for the convergence of ideas and the principles which enabled Griffin to create a democratic organic, city as a work of art: Unity, essential to the city, requires for so complex a problem a simple organism…organism is the significant term of Planning, implying unity, and simplicity, but requiring a degrees of comprehensiveness in an equation of the site conditions and the functions to which they are to be adapted sufficient for a logical place and setting for every need that ay eventuate.’ 4 The Approach Griffin’s Capitol and its engagement with the plan is the subject of the thesis argument. Dismissed as something that never could have been realized, it is an important concept in Australia’s political and social history and deserves considered interpretation. There are three aspects to the Capitol which are essential to the discourse, the Capitol as a place, the Capitol in relation to the Government Group, and the Capitol as signifier of the vision and focus and animus of the organic plan. None of this has been built – neither the Capitol building nor the Government Group ensemble; and Griffin’s plan has not 2 been followed as an organic construct. The engagement of Griffin’s Capitol with the plan is in all its aspects, an academic study and a study which relies on a visual imagination. The essential connections which support the argument - that Griffin’s Capitol as a place, its relationship with the Government Group and its place as focus of the design of Canberra were informed by the ideas of Louis Sullivan - can be reliably found in three works. These works were available to Griffin between 1900 and 1905 and there Sullivan explicates his theory which provided Griffin with the frame work for his practice of ‘landscape architecture’ and ultimately the development of his organic plan for Canberra. The three works by Sullivan which have been selected for detailed scrutiny for convergence with the expressed ideas of Griffin are: The Young Man in Architecture, Kindergarten Chats and Natural thinking: A Study in Democracy. There are no stylistic connections in the architecture of Griffin and Sullivan and no evidence of Griffin copying Sullivan – or anyone else. The approach taken has been to test the convergence of Sullivan’s theory in all his important writings, and in Griffin’s writings which refer to Canberra, and those writings which contain themes common with Sullivan’s writings. Griffin’s fidelity to his concept of the Capitol is tested in his struggle for his ideals with the Australian government and bureaucracy. In the final analysis the three works listed above, The Young Man in Architecture, Kindergarten Chats and Natural Thinking: A Study in Democracy were the essential three works needed to establish the convergence with the ideas and principles evident in Griffin’s writings. They are the works and principles used to make the connections put forward in the argument and assiduously made in the final chapter. Background Walter Burley Griffin was an American architect who described himself as a ‘landscape architect’. He meant that he created the forms and details of architecture and urban and community plans in response to the site conditions or environment as well as the human 3 requirements. It could have been another way of saying ‘organic architect’, which was used as a descriptive term by Sullivan and the Chicago progressives, but not widely used as a generic term in the profession of architecture until Frank Lloyd Wright identified his work with it in the 1930s. Griffin has been better known in Australia than in America, but that appears to be changing, with American scholars such as Paul Kruty believing that Griffin should be accorded a place near Sullivan and Wright. In Australia, as well as his design for Canberra, Griffin left major works in architecture and town planning, a few examples being: the original wing and refectory for Newman College and the Capitol Theatre in Melbourne, the original town plans for Griffith, Leeton and Port Stephens and the original development of the Sydney Suburb of Castlecrag. Walter Griffin was born at Maywood Illinois, an outer suburb of Chicago, on November 24, 1876, nine years after the birth of Wright in Wisconsin and twenty years after the birth of Louis Sullivan in Boston.
Recommended publications
  • VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final
    VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final Survey Report August 9, 2013 Village of River Forest Historic Preservation Commission CONTENTS INTRODUCTION P. 6 Survey Mission p. 6 Historic Preservation in River Forest p. 8 Survey Process p. 10 Evaluation Methodology p. 13 RIVER FOREST ARCHITECTURE P. 18 Architectural Styles p. 19 Vernacular Building Forms p. 34 HISTORIC CONTEXT P. 40 Nineteenth Century Residential Development p. 40 Twentieth Century Development: 1900 to 1940 p. 44 Twentieth Century Development: 1940 to 2000 p. 51 River Forest Commercial Development p. 52 Religious and Educational Buildings p. 57 Public Schools and Library p. 60 Campuses of Higher Education p. 61 Recreational Buildings and Parks p. 62 Significant Architects and Builders p. 64 Other Architects and Builders of Note p. 72 Buildings by Significant Architect and Builders p. 73 SURVEY FINDINGS P. 78 Significant Properties p. 79 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Noteworthy Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 82 Districts p. 82 Recommendations p. 83 INVENTORY P. 94 Significant Properties p. 94 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 97 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 103 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 104 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 121 Notable Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY P. 128 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RIVER FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION David Franek, Chair Laurel McMahon Paul Harding, FAIA Cindy Mastbrook Judy Deogracias David Raino-Ogden Tom Zurowski, AIA PROJECT COMMITTEE Laurel McMahon Tom Zurowski, AIA Michael Braiman, Assistant Village Administrator SURVEY TEAM Nicholas P.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch's Drawing Instruments
    Landmarks: People and Places across Australia, a gallery bringing together over 1500 objects, explores the history of Australia since European settlement. OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch’s drawing instruments In 2009, the National Museum of Australia acquired a collection of drawing instruments including pens, compasses and rulers, housed in a leather-bound presentation case. On the front of the case is a silver plaque engraved with the following: ‘Presented to John S Murdoch, Architect / by a few friends on the occasion / of his leaving Elgin for Inverness. 18 Boxed set of drawing instruments November 1881.’ belonging to John Smith Murdoch, about 1881. Photo: Lannon Harley, National Museum of Australia. The case contains fifteen individual drawing instruments, which are stored in a moulded tray, lined with blue grosgrain and silk fabric, and a recessed storage compartment in the lid. The lid lining is stamped with ‘W H Harling, Mathematical Instrument Manufacturer, 40 Hatton Garden, London’ and the company’s crest. The recessed lid compartment contains a sector, protractor and parallel rule. In the 1600s there was a developed stylus that could draw a line with a specific width called a ruling pen. The stylus had two curved metal pieces, which were joined by a screw. Ink was trickled between the blades, from which it flowed evenly across the paper. The basic model was maintained for a long time, with minor modifications, until the 1930s when the German technical drawing pens came to the market. Many of the instruments were made by W H Harling, as indicated by the stamp. However, some of the instruments were made by J and W E Archbutt, Stanley and Elliot Brothers, suggesting that the case originally contained instruments from a variety of manufacturers or that Murdoch had replaced items over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan Final Report
    Australian War Memorial Heritage Management Plan Final Report Prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Heritage Consultants for the Australian War Memorial January 2011 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0420 1 Draft Report July 2008 06-0420 2 Second Draft Report August 2008 06-0420 3 Third Draft Report September 2008 06-0420 4 Fourth Draft Report April 2009 06-0420 5 Final Draft Report (for public comment) September 2009 06-0420 6 Final Report January 2011 Contents Page Glossary of Terms Abbreviations Conservation Terms Sources Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................i How To Use This Report .............................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Houses in Canberra 1950–1970
    EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 MILTON CAMERON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cameron, Milton. Title: Experiments in modern living : scientists’ houses in Canberra, 1950 - 1970 / Milton Cameron. ISBN: 9781921862694 (pbk.) 9781921862700 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Scientists--Homes and haunts--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Architecture, Modern Architecture--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Canberra (A.C.T.)--Buildings, structures, etc Dewey Number: 720.99471 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Sarah Evans. Front cover photograph of Fenner House by Ben Wrigley, 2012. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press; revised August 2012 Contents Acknowledgments . vii Illustrations . xi Abbreviations . xv Introduction: Domestic Voyeurism . 1 1. Age of the Masters: Establishing a scientific and intellectual community in Canberra, 1946–1968 . 7 2 . Paradigm Shift: Boyd and the Fenner House . 43 3 . Promoting the New Paradigm: Seidler and the Zwar House . 77 4 . Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House . 101 5 . Where Science Meets Art: Bischoff and the Gascoigne House . 131 6 . The Origins of Form: Grounds, Bischoff and the Frankel House . 161 Afterword: Before and After Science .
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation, Creativity and Leadership Report of a Study of the ACT Innovation System
    Innovation, Creativity and Leadership Report of a Study of the ACT Innovation System March 08 ISBN-978-0-642-60439-2 ISBN-10: 0-642-60439-8 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Territory Records Office, Community and Infrastructure Services, Territory and Municipal Services, ACT Government. GPO Box 158, Canberra City ACT 2601. Produced by Publishing Services for: InnovationBusiness & Industry Development Branch, Business & Projects Division, Chief Minister’s Department, Enquiries about this publication should be directed to: GPO Box 158 Canberra City, ACT 2601 Phone 1800 244 650 Howard Partners www.business.act.gov.au/ ABN 89 090 817 360 Level G, 15 Beauchamp Street Publication No 08/0324 http://www.act.gov.au Deakin ACT 2600 Telephone: Canberra Connect 132 281 www.howardpartners.com.au ii Contents Executive Summary 1 Recommendations 6 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Background 9 1.2 Innovation and innovation systems 10 1.3 The competitive environment 21 1.4 Approach to the study 22 2 The innovation policy context: vision, plans, and frameworks 23 2.1 Innovation policy objectives 23 2.2 The Canberra plan and strategy 24 2.3 The economic framework 26 2.4 Australian Government purchasing and procurement 32 2.5 Issues and implications 37 3 Innovation system capability 39 3.1 Research and development capability 39 3.2 Creative capability 52 3.3 Business and entrepreneurial capability
    [Show full text]
  • OTHER PRAIRIE SCHOOL ARCHITECTS George Washington
    OTHER PRAIRIE SCHOOL ARCHITECTS George Washington Maher (1864–1926) Maher, at the age of 18, began working for the architectural firm of Bauer & Hill in Chicago before entering Silsbee’s office with Wright and Elmslie. Between late 1889 and early 1890, Maher formed a brief partnership with Charles Corwin. He then practiced independently until his son Philip joined him in the early 1920s. Maher developed his “motif-rhythm” design theory, which involved using a decorative symbol throughout a building. In Pleasant Home, the Farson-Mills House (Oak Park, 1897), he used a lion and a circle and tray motif. Maher enjoyed considerable social success, designing many houses on Chicago’s North Shore and several buildings for Northwestern University, including the gymnasium (1908–1909) and the Swift Hall of Engineering. In Winona, Minnesota, Maher designed the J. R. Watkins Administration Building (1911 – 1913), and the Winona Savings Bank (1913). Like Wright, Maher hoped to create an American style, but as his career progressed his designs became less original and relied more on past foreign styles. Maher’s frustration with his career may have led to his suicide in 1926. Dwight Heald Perkins (1867–1941) Perkins moved to Chicago from Memphis at age 12. He worked in the Stockyards and then in the architectural firm of Wheelock & Clay. A family friend financed sending Perkins to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he studied architecture for two years and then taught for a year. He returned to Chicago in 1888 after working briefly for Henry Hobson Richardson. Between 1888 and 1894 Perkins worked for Burnham & Root.
    [Show full text]
  • John G. Thorpe Young Professionals and Students Fellowship
    JOHN G. THORPE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENTS FELLOWSHIP Program Overview The Thorpe Fellowship provides an opportunity for young professionals and graduate students to attend the annual Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy conference by covering the registration fee for the event. The conference provides edu- cational panels, presentations and commentary about various aspects of Wright’s work by scholars, practitioners, building owners and other experts. The conference also enables attendees to experience the architecture directly through tours to Wright sites in the vicinity of the conference, including private residences that are rarely open to the public, and to buildings by other architects of interest. The program was established in 2016 to honor John Garrett Thorpe, restoration architect and longtime Conservancy board member. Program Award Fellowship recipients receive one regular general conference registration to attend the Conservancy’s annual conference, including all education sessions and regular tours (optional add-on events may be added at the fellowship recipient’s ex- pense based on availability). For the 2016 Conservancy conference in San Francisco, Nov. 2-5, the program award is valued at $645. Two awards will be made in 2016, the first year of the program. Recipients are responsible for their own transporta- tion to the conference and all lodging expenses. Eligibility Young professionals in the first five years of their careers in architecture or historic preservation and graduate students in architecture or historic preservation (full-time or part-time) currently enrolled at the time of application are eligible to apply for a fellowship. Students may have completed their degree by the time of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Interested in Getting Involved?
    06 | 2012 From the President On 28 April, aim to increase their awareness suggestions you may have and I will Engineering of engineering and infrastructure be seeking guidance from the advisory Heritage Canberra challenges that Canberra will face in committee. invited the the future. As a follow up we will be In closing, I would encourage Managing Director offering briefing sessions to all ACT you to put the first full week of of ACTEW, Mark Legislative Assembly sitting members August (6–12) into your diaries and Sullivan, and and commenced with a briefing to the have your family and friends attend myself to unveil an sitting ALP politicians on 24 May (we Australian Engineering Week which interpretive panel commemorating hope to brief the Liberals and Greens is our showcase event for public Canberra’s Main Outfall Sewer at in June). The sessions use the ACT engagement. For children there are Lennox Gardens (further details on Infrastructure Report Card 2010 as a the engineering games designed to page 7). The sewer was completed basis for discussion. encourage problem solving with an in 1926 and is still in use today. Over the last couple of years our ‘engineering bent’. I would also like Most of us are unaware of the continuing professional development to publically acknowledge Bob Harvey contributions of chartered engineers, program (technical program) has who received a Certificate of Merit as we solve problems and create markedly improved in both the for his contribution to Canberra’s enduring solutions. Today’s important number of presentations and engineering heritage. If you know of engineering decisions will be the attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • John G. Thorpe Young Professionals and Students Fellowship
    JOHN G. THORPE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENTS FELLOWSHIP Program Overview The Thorpe Fellowship provides an opportunity for young professionals and graduate students to attend the annual Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy conference by covering the registration fee for the event. The conference provides edu- cational panels, presentations and commentary about various aspects of Wright’s work by scholars, practitioners, building owners and other experts. The conference also enables attendees to experience the architecture directly through tours to Wright sites in the vicinity of the conference, including private residences that are rarely open to the public, and to buildings by other architects of interest. The program was established in 2016 to honor John Garrett Thorpe, restoration architect and longtime Conservancy board member. Program Award Fellowship recipients receive one regular general conference registration to attend the Conservancy’s annual conference, including all education sessions, regular tours (optional add-on events may be added at the fellowship recipient’s expense based on availability), and the Wright Spirit Awards gala dinner. For the 2018 Conservancy conference in Madison, Oct. 10- 14, the program award is valued at $675. Two or more awards will be made in 2018. Recipients are responsible for their own transportation to the conference and all lodging expenses. Eligibility Young professionals in the first five years of their careers in architecture or historic preservation and graduate students in architecture or historic preservation (full-time or part-time) currently enrolled at the time of application are eligible to apply for a fellowship. Students may have completed their degree by the time of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluaton of National Register of Historic Places Eligibility of the Windego Park Auditorium
    EVALUATON OF NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ELIGIBILITY OF THE WINDEGO PARK AUDITORIUM CONTACT : LAUREN ANDERSON | 6 12 .843 .4 1 44 | ANDERSON@NEWHI S TORY .C OM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In November of 2020, the City of Anoka hired New History to evaluate the continued National Register of Historic Places eligibility of the Windego Park Auditorium. The Windego Park Auditorium was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in February of 1980 and is considered historically significant for its design and its role as a community-gathering place. At the time of the property’s designation, a number of key features of the original auditorium had been removed, including: • The canvas awning system • The ticket booth • Light fixtures and railings • Dressing rooms • A sense of the location of the stage The National Register of Historic Places nomination is quite clear about the condition of the site at the time of listing, noting that “features of the original design have either been destroyed or have deteriorated.”1 With a full understanding of the condition of the site, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the Minnesota State Review Board, and the National Park Service chose to list the property in the NRHP. Further, in 1984, the SHPO reaffirmed this decision in response to a request from the City of Anoka to remove the property from the NRHP. The authors of this report compared the historic integrity of the site at the time of listing to the conditions of the site today and determined that, between 1980 and the present, the property has not experienced a loss of qualities that caused it to be originally listed in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • School Architecture in Chicago During the Progressive Era: the Career of Dwight H
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1988 School Architecture in Chicago during the Progressive Era: The Career of Dwight H. Perkins Donna R. Nelson Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Nelson, Donna R., "School Architecture in Chicago during the Progressive Era: The Career of Dwight H. Perkins" (1988). Dissertations. 2562. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2562 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1988 Donna R. Nelson SCHOOL ARCHITECTURE IN CHICAGO DURING THE PROGEESSIVE ERA: THE CAREER OF DWIGHT H. PERKINS By Donna R. Nelson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1988 Copyright by Donna R. Nelson May, 1988 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer is grateful for the encouragement, patience and support received from her family and friends throughout the period of her doctoral studies. A study of this nature cannot be accomplished without the cooperation and assistance of many people. Special appreciation is extended to Mary Woolover at the Art Institute of Chicago; Lynn Arbeen of the Chicago Board of Education, Bureau of Architecture; and Geri Fudema and Cynthia Hasemeier for their expertise and assistance with typing and computers.
    [Show full text]