DOCSLIB.ORG

Focus on National Implementation of International Criminal Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Focus on National Implementation of International Criminal Law eucrim ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE 3 – 4 / 2007 THE EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW ASSOCIATIONS‘ FORUM SUCCESSOR TO AGON Focus on National Implementation of International Criminal Law Standards Dossier particulier sur la mise en œuvre nationale des standards internationaux en matière pénale Schwerpunktthema: Nationale Umsetzung internationaler strafrechtlicher Standards Criminal Law Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests in Croatia Prof. Dr. Zlata Đurđević The Effective Implementation of International Anti-Corruption Conventions Bryane Michael and Habit Hajredin The Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant in the Republic of Slovenia Dr. Katja Šugman Stubbs The Nordic Answer to the European Arrest Warrant: The Nordic Arrest Warrant Prof. Dr. Asbjørn Strandbakken 3 – 4 / 2007 ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE Contents Editorial News* Articles European Union National Implementation of Inter- national Criminal Law Standards The Enlargement of the Schengen Area 104 Ne bis in idem 104 Victim Protection Foundations 105 Freezing of Assets 120 Criminal Law Protection of the EU’s 73 Reform of the European Union Financial Interests in Croatia 75 Proclamation of the Charter of Cooperation Prof. Dr. Zlata Đurđević Fundamental Rights 108 Law Enforcement Cooperation 76 Community Powers in 109 Customs Cooperation 128 The Effective Implementation of Interna- Criminal Matters 109 Police Cooperation tional Anti-Corruption Conventions 78 The Hague Programme Review 110 European Arrest Warrant Bryane Michael and Habit Hajredin 79 Legislation 110 European Supervision Order/ 81 Better Regulation in the EU Transfer of Sentenced Persons 133 The Implementation of the European 111 E-Justice Arrest Warrant in the Republic of Institutions 111 External Dimension Slovenia 82 OLAF Dr. Katja Šugman Stubbs 83 Europol 84 Eurojust 138 The Nordic Answer to the European Ar- 84 Eurojust/European Judicial Council of Europe rest Warrant: The Nordic Arrest Warrant Network (EJN) Prof. Dr. Asbjørn Strandbakken 86 European Union Agency for Foundations Fundamental Rights (FRA) 112 Relations between the Council of Europe and the EU Specific Areas of Crime / 112 Reform of the European Imprint Substantive Criminal Law Court of Human Rights 87 Protection of Financial Interests 113 Execution of Judgments of 91 Tax Fraud/VAT the European Court of Hu- 95 Cigarette Smuggling man Rights 97 Corruption 97 Money Laundering Specific Areas of Crime 98 Money Counterfeiting 115 Corruption 98 Non-Cash Means of Payment 115 Money Laundering 99 Counterfeiting and Piracy 117 Cybercrime 99 Organised Crime 100 Illegal Employment Procedural Criminal Law 100 Racism and Xenophobia 118 Justice Organisation Procedural Criminal Law Cooperation 100 Procedural Safeguards 101 Data Protection Legislation * News contain internet links referring to more detailed information. These links can be easily accessed either by clicking on the respective ID-number of the desired link in the online-journal or – for print version readers – by accessing our webpage www.mpicc.de/eucrim/search.php and then entering the ID-number of the link in the search form. Editorial Dear readers, I am very pleased to write an editorial for eucrim. This review Prosecutor’s Office as a means to is an excellent forum for specialists to exchange views on the give emphasis to its commitment dynamic area of European criminal law. This edition will focus towards a better protection of Eu- on the national implementation of European and international ropean financial interests and its penal standards. As Vice-President of the Commission respon- public administration. With regard sible for administrative affairs, audit and anti-fraud (OLAF), to the European public adminis- this topic is of direct interest in two areas: the fight against tration and its civil service, I am fraud and integrity policy for civil servants. keenly following international dis- cussions on standards concerning Over the last decade, the protection of the financial interests ethics, integrity and better govern- of the EU acted as a motor for criminal law activities at the ance. The Commission, of course, level of the EU. This is, to use an economist‘s term, a “Euro- strives to spearhead international Siim Kallas pean good”. Only around 20 % of the EU budget is managed standards. The UN Convention directly by the Commission, the majority is managed by Mem- against Corruption is a landmark. ber States. Revenue comes from taxpayers across Europe. It It is in various ways intertwined with past and future Euro- should be equally well protected against fraud across the EU. pean efforts as regards preventing and combating corruption However, even though the budget is central to its executive and other criminal activities in public administration. Amongst role, the Commission depends essentially on Member States’ the instruments that the negotiators at the UN took into ac- authorities for sanctions other than those of an administrative count is the EU Convention on the protection of the European or financial nature. For criminal offences against EU financial Communities’ financial interests and its protocols, as well as interests, both penal law investigations and prosecution are in the EU Convention on the fight against corruption. Due to this their competence. influence, some of the obligations imposed on Member States in the penal law sphere derive from both, the UN standard and Sadly, our experience with cases shows that different Member the EU standard. The Commission has proposed the signature States have given the same case widely differing treatment. It and subsequent conclusion, on behalf of the European Com- is in fact a typical EU dilemma: the Commission has a great in- munity, of the UN Convention, which would make it a party. terest in the effective fight against fraud, but lacks the required competences. The Member States have the competences, but Ethics and integrity are crucial for maintaining and improving often do not give it the same priority. This is nobody’s fault: trust in the European institutions and projects. Civil servants‘ the national judicial authorities must continually arbitrate be- actions determine the reputation and performance of the institu- tween the numerous and competing priorities while resources tions. Within its own house, the European Commission does not are scarce. In circumstances of increasingly complex work, it tolerate fraud or corrupt practices of any kind. The Commission is sometimes difficult for them to take on the protection of the promotes transparent governance and a high level of account- Community’s financial interests as a top priority. Integration ability well beyond the work environment of its own house. and the free movement across the EU, which unfortunately are also exploited by criminals, increase the need for coopera- Of course, and given the acknowledged constraints, at the Eu- tion and coordination against crime and fraud. The trend of ropean level our focus is on prevention and detection. How- organised crime towards defrauding EU must lead us to reflect ever, criminal law is needed for sanctions to act as a strong on how to develop robust structures at the European level to deterrent and criminal liability is needed for an effective in- effectively counter this criminal conduct. centive to play by the rules. Several instruments have already strengthened the frame- We count on your qualified advice and contribution as experts work and unified application for the protection of the EU‘s on European criminal law to offer all European citizens the financial interests. It is worth mentioning that the Commis- protection guarantees which they deserve! sion just adopted a second report on the implementation of the EU instruments on the protection of its financial interests in the Member States which pointed out where the situation is Siim Kallas still far from perfect. Against this background, the Commis- Vice-President of the European Commission sion will further develop the project of the European Public responsible for administration, audit and anti-fraud eucrim 3–4 / 2007 | 65 NEWS Poland and the Czech Republic were re- moved. Together with these two coun- tries, Germany installed common cen- tres for police and customs cooperation in Swiecko (for the German-Polish bor- der) and Schwandorf (for the German- Czech border) which allow a far quicker European Union exchange of information, the establish- ment of situation reports, and coordinat- ed action along the joint border area. The German-Polish and the German-Czech the European Parliament had delivered border services centres were inspired by The Enlargement of the Schengen Area its supporting opinion on 15 November the model of the Franco-German centre 2007. For the preparations of the deci- in Kehl/Germany near Strasbourg. By Thomas Wahl and Sarah Schultz sions of the Council and the European eucrim ID=0703003 Parliament, a detailed evaluation was Europe Steps Up to Extended carried out in those Member States Background: What Is “Schengen”? Border-Free Area which wish to join the fee border area. In the context of the European integra- As of 21 December 2007, Estonia, the For more background information on the tion process, “Schengen” stands for the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Hungary, Schengen cooperation, the evaluation realisation of the concept of free move- Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and procedure, and the Schengen Informa- ments of persons and the creation of a Slovenia have become part of the Schen- tion System, see the news items below. citizens’ Europe. In 1985, five European gen area. Controls at internal land and eucrim ID=0703001 countries – Belgium, France, Germany, sea borders between these countries and Luxembourg, and the Netherlands – the current 15 Schengen Member States Reactions to the Enlargement signed an agreement “on the gradual have been lifted. On 30 March 2008, of the Schengen Area abolition of checks at their common bor- with the change in flight schedules, The vast majority of politicians reacted ders” in Schengen – a small village in checks were also lifted at air borders. positively to the recent enlargement of Luxembourg at the geographical nexus This development results in a very tangi- the Schengen area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementing the Protocol 36 Opt
    September 2012 Opting out of EU Criminal law: What is actually involved? Alicia Hinarejos, J.R. Spencer and Steve Peers CELS Working Paper, New Series, No.1 http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/publications/working_papers.php Centre for European Legal Studies • 10 West Road • Cambridge CB3 9DZ Telephone: 01223 330093 • Fax: 01223 330055 • http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Protocol 36 to the Lisbon Treaty gives the UK the right to opt out en bloc of all the police and criminal justice measures adopted under the Treaty of Maastricht ahead of the date when the Court of Justice of the EU at Luxembourg will acquire jurisdiction in relation to them. The government is under pressure to use this opt-out in order to “repatriate criminal justice”. It is rumoured that this opt-out might be offered as a less troublesome alternative to those are calling for a referendum on “pulling out of Europe”. Those who advocate the Protocol 36 opt-out appear to assume that it would completely remove the UK from the sphere of EU influence in matters of criminal justice and that the opt-out could be exercised cost-free. In this Report, both of these assumptions are challenged. It concludes that if the opt-out were exercised the UK would still be bound by a range of new police and criminal justice measures which the UK has opted into after Lisbon. And it also concludes that the measures opted out of would include some – notably the European Arrest Warrant – the loss of which could pose a risk to law and order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schengen Acquis
    The Schengen acquis integrated into the European Union ð 1 May 1999 Notice This booklet, which has been prepared by the General Secretariat of the Council, does not commit either the Community institutions or the governments of the Member States. Please note that only the text that shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities L 239, 22 September 2000, is deemed authentic. For further information, please contact the Information Policy, Transparency and Public Relations Division at the following address: General Secretariat of the Council Rue de la Loi 175 B-1048 Brussels Fax 32 (0)2 285 5332 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://ue.eu.int A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001 ISBN 92-824-1776-X European Communities, 2001 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium 3 FOREWORD When the Amsterdam Treaty entered into force on 1 May 1999, cooperation measures hitherto in the Schengen framework were integrated into the European Union framework. The Schengen Protocol annexed to the Amsterdam Treaty lays down detailed arrangements for that integration process. An annex to the protocolspecifies what is meant by ‘Schengen acquis’. The decisions and declarations adopted within the Schengen institutional framework by the Executive Committee have never before been published. The GeneralSecretariat of the Councilhas decided to produce for those interested a collection of the Executive Committee decisions and declarations integrated by the Councildecision of 20 May 1999 (1999/435/EC).
    [Show full text]
  • The 2011 Debacle Over Danish Border Control: a Mismatch of Domestic and European Games Malthe Munkøe
    The 2011 Debacle over Danish Border Control: A Mismatch of Domestic and European Games Malthe Munkøe DEPARTMENT OF EU INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY STUDIES EU Diplomacy Paper 01 / 2012 Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies EU Diplomacy Papers 1/2012 The 2011 Debacle over Danish Border Control: A Mismatch of Domestic and European Games Malthe Munkøe © Malthe Munkøe 2012 Dijver 11 | BE-8000 Bruges, Belgium | Tel. +32 (0)50 477 251 | Fax +32 (0)50 477 250 | E-mail [email protected] | www.coleurope.eu/ird Malthe Munkøe About the Author Malthe Munkøe is Consultant at Dansk Erhverv (The Danish Chamber of Commerce), a Danish business confederation. He holds an MA in EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies (Charles Darwin Promotion 2010) from the College of Europe in Bruges, Belgium, and a Master’s degree in Political Science from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. He has previously published in a number of Danish academic journals and edited book anthologies on the financial crisis and on public sector reforms. Editorial Team: Andrew Bower, Gino Brunswijck, Francesca Fenton, Grzegorz Grobicki, Sieglinde Gstöhl, Vincent Laporte, Jing Men, Raphaël Métais, Charles Thépaut, Claudia Zulaika Escauriaza Dijver 11 | BE-8000 Bruges, Belgium | Tel. +32 (0)50 477 251 | Fax +32 (0)50 477 250 | E-mail [email protected] | www.coleurope.eu/ird Views expressed in the EU Diplomacy Papers are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect positions of either the series editors or the College of Europe. 2 EU Diplomacy Paper 1/2012 Abstract In May 2011 the Danish minority government successfully obtained the support of the Danish People’s Party to carry out a comprehensive pension reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Dietary Supplements Hearing
    S. HRG. 108–997 REGULATION OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 28, 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20–196 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:04 May 24, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\20196.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina, CONRAD BURNS, Montana Ranking TRENT LOTT, Mississippi DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana GORDON SMITH, Oregon BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois RON WYDEN, Oregon JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada BARBARA BOXER, California GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire MARIA CANTWELL, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JEANNE BUMPUS, Republican Staff Director and General Counsel ROBERT W. CHAMBERLIN, Republican Chief Counsel KEVIN D. KAYES, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel GREGG ELIAS, Democratic General Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:04 May 24, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\20196.TXT JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on October 28, 2003 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 527 Final 2012/0253
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2012 COM(2012) 527 final 2012/0253 (COD)C7-0301/12 Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Decision No 574/2007/EC with a view to increasing the co-financing rate of the External Borders Fund for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability EN EN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons and objectives The sustained financial and economic crisis is stepping up the pressure on national financial resources as Member States reduce their budgets. In this context, ensuring the smooth implementation of programmes adopted under the four Funds established as part of the General Programme on ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Funds’), is of particular importance as a means of injecting funds into the economy. Nonetheless, implementation of the programmes is often challenging as a result of liquidity problems caused by budget constraints that often lead to severe cutbacks in expenditures, consequently augmenting problems during a period of sustained crisis. This is the case in particular for those Member States which have been most affected by the current crisis and have received financial assistance under a programme from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM), the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or bilateral loans for the euro countries or from the Balance of Payments (BoP) mechanism for non-euro countries. To date, six countries — including Greece, which also received financial assistance before the establishment of EFSM via bilateral loans — have requested financial assistance under the various support mechanisms and have agreed with the Commission on a macro-economic adjustment programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Police and Border Controls Cooperation at the EU Level: Dilemmas, Opportunities and Challenges of a Differentiated Approach by Guido Lessing*
    EU60: RE-FOUNDING EUROPE THE RESPONSIBILITY POLICE TO PROPOSE AND BORDER CONTROLS COOPERATION AT THE EU LEVEL: DILEMMAS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH GUIDO LESSING 8 MARCH 2017 ISBN 978-88-9368-033-2 POLICE AND BORDER CONTROLS COOPERATION AT THE EU LEVEL: DILEMMAS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH by Guido Lessing* Abstract: The history of the European Union is a history of differentiated integration. Differentiation is a logical corollary of integration insofar as politicization and incentives for further integration differ among member states. Whereas the first opt-outs from Justice and Home Affairs were conceded in order to continue the ratification process of the Treaty creating the European Union, the question today is whether growing differentiation can save or will wreck the Union. In times of Brexit and surging euroscepticism and against the backdrop of the refugee crisis, the Union’s resilience to disintegration is at stake. The willingness of member states to make the next steps towards more integration in order to save the Schengen acquis will decide the future of the Union. Further differentiation in the area of freedom, security and justice threatens to reinforce the dividing line between the core and the periphery of Europe. Keywords: EU integration | Migration | Refugees | Frontex | UK | Denmark Introduction: A challenging state of affairs Pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), “The Union shall offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, in which the free movement of persons is ensured in conjunction with appropriate measures with respect to external border controls, asylum, * Guido Lessing is Research Assistant at the Robert Schuman Institute of the Luxembourg University.
    [Show full text]
  • Repositorio Universidad De Belgrano
    Las tesis de Belgrano Escuela de Lenguas y Estudios Extranjeros Maestría en Traducción EUROPE IN 12 LESSONS: THE IMPACT OF EU LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION POLICY ON SUCCESSIVE EDITIONS OF AN EU BOOKLET Christina Thorngreen Director de tesis: Professor Douglas Town Resumen Esta tesis examina cómo el predominio actual del inglés se relaciona con la política de comunicación general de la UE. Algunos estudios anteriores y la evidencia anecdótica muestran que el inglés se está convirtiendo en el principal idioma de trabajo de la UE y que el francés se usa cada vez en menor medida. En este trabajo de indagación, el folleto de la Comisión Europea "Europa en 12 lecciones" sirve como estudio de caso. Incluye un estudio longitudinal, como así también un análisis retórico de las cuatro ediciones en francés e inglés publicadas entre 1997 y 2014. Los cambios en estas ediciones y las entrevistas con dos de los principales agentes en la producción de la publicación indican que las instituciones europeas se están alejando de un estilo de escritura académico con frases largas y complejas, que caracteriza a lenguas latinas, para acercarse a un estilo de comunicación anglosajón más secillo para el lector. De manera oficial, todas las 24 lenguas de la UE tienen igual importancia. Sin embargo, el creciente euroescepticismo y los críticos como el lobby Open Europe, que acusan a la UE de un 'déficit democrático', pueden contribuir a que el inglés se vuelva su lengua principal. Este trabajo sostiene que los cambios observados en "Europa en 12 lecciones", con el tiempo y entre los dos idiomas, son indicadores del cambio en la política de comunicación general de la UE, que busca facilitar la lectura y ayudar a las instituciones a comunicar sus beneficios a los ciudadanos.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Criminal Law Associations' Forum 2013
    eucrim 2013 / 4 THE EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW ASSOCIATIONS‘ FORUM Focus: Protection of Financial Interests of the European Union Dossier particulier: Protection des intérêts financiers de l'Union européenne Schwerpunktthema: Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Union Guest Editorial Viviane Reding/Algirdas Šemeta An Overall Analysis of the Proposal for a Regulation on Eurojust Prof. Dr. Anne Weyembergh The Dutch Judge of Instruction and the Public Prosecutor in International Judicial Cooperation Mr.Dr. Jaap van der Hulst The Use of Inside Information Anna Blachnio-Parzych, Ph.D. 2013 / 4 ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE The Associations for European Criminal Law and the Protection of Financial Interests of the EU is a network of academics and practitioners. The aim of this cooperation is to develop a European criminal law which both respects civil liberties and at the same time protects European citizens and the European institutions effectively. Joint seminars, joint research projects and annual meetings of the associations’ presidents are organised to achieve this aim. Contents News* Articles European Union Protection of Financial Interests of the European Union Foundations Procedural Criminal Law 127 An Overall Analysis of the Proposal 111 The Stockholm Programme 120 Procedural Safeguards for a Regulation on Eurojust 111 Schengen 121 Data Protection Prof. Dr. Anne Weyemberg 111 Enlargement Cooperation 131 The Dutch Judge of Instruction and the Institutions 122 Law Enforcement Cooperation Public Prosecutor in International Judicial 112 Commission Cooperation 113 OLAF Mr.Dr. Jaap van der Hulst 113 Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) 136 The Use of Inside Information 113 European Court of Justice (ECJ) Judgment of the European Court of Justice 114 Europol of 23 December 2009 116 Eurojust Council of Europe Anna Blachnio-Parzych, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amended Complaint
    Case 3:15-md-02633-SI Document 75 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 87 Christopher I. Brain [email protected] Kim D. Stephens [email protected] Tousley Brain Stephens PLLC 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: 206.682.5600 Fax: 206.682.2992 Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel Keith S. Dubanevich [email protected] Steve D. Larson [email protected] Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter P.C. 209 SW Oak Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Tel: 503.227.1600 Fax: 503.227.6840 Interim Liaison Plaintiffs’ Counsel [Additional counsel appear on the signature page.] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON IN RE: PREMERA BLUE CROSS Case No. 3:15-md-2633-SI CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION COMPLAINT This Document Relates to All Actions DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:15-md-02633-SI Document 75 Filed 09/30/16 Page 2 of 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. NATURE OF THE CASE ..................................................................................... 1 II. PARTIES ............................................................................................................... 3 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ............................................................................ 7 IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 8 A. Premera Had A Duty And Contractual Obligation To Protect Its Members’ Sensitive Information From Unauthorized Disclosures. .......... 8 B. Premera Failed
    [Show full text]
  • 124394/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt Am 11/09/13
    124394/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt am 11/09/13 COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 September 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 13497/13 COMPET 638 MI 744 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 1 August 2013 To: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2013) 401 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT): Initial Results of the Mapping of the Acquis Delegations will find attached document SWD(2013) 401 final. Encl.: SWD(2013) 401 final 13497/13 MS/ll DG G 3A EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.8.2013 SWD(2013) 401 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT): Initial Results of the Mapping of the Acquis EN EN Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Agriculture and Rural Development ............................................................................................... 5 2. Budget ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3. Climate Action .............................................................................................................................. 17 4. Communications Networks, Content and Technology .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure File
    Procedure file Basic information CNS - Consultation procedure 1994/0911(CNS) Procedure completed Regulation Convention for the protection of the Communities' financial interests Repealed by 2012/0193(COD) See also 2015/0210(NLE) Subject 8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud Key players European Parliament Committee responsible Rapporteur Appointed LIBE Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs 16/09/1994 PSE BONTEMPI Rinaldo Committee for opinion Rapporteur for opinion Appointed JURI Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights 07/09/1994 PSE ODDY Christine Margaret CONT Budgetary Control 27/07/1994 PPE THEATO Diemut R. Council of the European Union Council configuration Meeting Date Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) 1859 20/06/1995 Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN 1835 20/03/1995 Social Affairs 1813 06/12/1994 Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN 1812 05/12/1994 Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) 1808 01/12/1994 Key events 15/06/1994 Legislative proposal published COM(1994)0214 Summary 24/10/1994 Committee referral announced in Parliament 05/12/1994 Debate in Council 1812 06/12/1994 Debate in Council 1813 02/03/1995 Vote in committee Summary 02/03/1995 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st A4-0039/1995 reading/single reading 15/03/1995 Debate in Parliament Summary 15/03/1995 Decision by Parliament T4-0092/1995 Summary 20/03/1995 Debate in Council 1835 20/06/1995 Debate in Council 1859 26/07/1995 Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament 26/07/1995 End of procedure in Parliament 27/11/1995 Final act published in
    [Show full text]