Karl Gebhardt and Herta Oberheuser: the Road to Medical Murder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Karl Gebhardt and Herta Oberheuser: the Road to Medical Murder KARL GEBHARDT AND HERTA OBERHEUSER: THE ROAD TO MEDICAL MURDER CHRISTINE ELEANOR CLARKE Master of Arts in History Nipissing University 2013 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this Thesis or Major Research Paper. I authorize Nipissing University to lend this Thesis or Major Research Paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Nipissing University to reproduce this Thesis or Dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Nazi doctors violated the inherent trust and intimacy of the medical profession by conducting experiments on non-consenting concentration camp prisoners. Focusing on Dr. Karl Gebhardt and Dr. Herta Oberheuser, it became clear that perpetrators of medical crimes shared sociological and biographical factors that affected their decision to join and participate in the violence of Nazism in spite of the demands placed upon them by their profession to heal and not harm. Furthermore, their work relationship, shaped by Nazi and gender ideology, had a significant impact on how they operated within the concentration camp system, and later, how they were perceived in an American military trial. By examining a male superior and a female subordinate, the influence of gender was revealed not only in the primary court documentation, but also in the current historiography. Connecting sociology with biography enables a more complete understanding of the historic individual that proves invaluable given that many more recent interpretations of Gebhardt and especially Oberheuser have been coloured by sentiment and moral judgment. Clarke 1 The relationship between doctors and patients is special in that it requires trust and intimacy uncommon to many professional relationships. Through this connection, doctors are able to identify, explain, and remove pain. 1 Among the many questions regarding the medical experiments to be undertaken at the behest of the Nazi regime, is the question of how doctors could cause pain and deliberately think up ways to cause pain, when it is their professional calling to diagnose and get rid of it. Though factors vary by individual perpetrators, in the cases of Karl Gebhardt and Herta Oberheuser, generational cohorts, gender, and biography provide significant indicators as to what would motivate successful, intelligent medical professionals to make of a healing art, a killing method. While the majority of doctors under the Nazi regime (1933-1945) led benign wartime existences, Dr. Karl Gebhardt (1897-1948) and Dr. Herta Oberheuser (1911-1978) participated in medical experiments sanctioned by the Nazi regime for the purposes of improving battle conditions for German soldiers. They used the inmates of the Ravensbrück concentration camp, located north of Berlin, as test subjects in a number of these experiments between 1942-1943. For instance, to test the effectiveness of sulfanilamide, a drug used to combat infections sustained on the front lines; Gebhardt and Oberheuser would inflict a wound on the patient’s leg and inject the healthy tissue with bacteria such as streptococcus, gas gangrene, and tetanus. Such wounds were deemed inaccurate to battle conditions. To better simulate wounds attained on the battlefield, blood flow was restricted to the area of operation and pieces of wood or glass were introduced to aggravate the infection. Some patients received sulfanilamide. Others received different drugs.2 Some received no medication. Patients did die as a result of this experiment. 1 Oliver Garceau, “The Morals of Medicine.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 363 (1966), 60-69, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1036469 (accessed July 28, 2013) 60. 2 Indictment, Count Two–War Crimes. October 25, 1946, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol.1, 12, http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war- Others experienced severe pain and, in many cases, remained ill for extended periods of time afterward. In certain cases, additional reparative surgeries were required.3 In the case of Nazi Germany, doctors were among the earliest, most eager and in some instances, most zealous perpetrators of war crimes. Statistically, physicians joined the ranks of the Third Reich in large numbers very early on in the regime. Nearly 73 percent of male physicians between 1933-1945 were affiliated with the Nazis.4 Of that 73 percent, 35 percent were involved in the National Socialist German Doctors Association (Nationalsozialistischer Deutscher Ärztebund or NSDÄB). For women, 52 percent of physicians were affiliated with Nazism, while 10 percent were involved in the NSDÄB, impressive given that many women were removed from or left practicing medicine and returned to their homes to practice domesticity.5 Where gender, generational cohorts and biography are key, is in methodology. Nazism, marked by fascist ultra-nationalism, anti-semitism, biological/racial tenets, and the desire to create a Utopian society made up of a racially superior citizenry, is also a very gendered political ideology.6 When applied to a society, Nazism creates very gendered roles for individual citizens. Herta Oberheuser and Karl Gebhardt were both working within this social system, not only as individuals, but in relation to each other. Using both Gebhardt and Oberheuser provides an opportunity to compare and contrast the differences experienced and exhibited by female and male perpetrators, as analyzing them separately, in accordance with Joan Scott’s notion that gender is relational, would provide an incomplete picture of the one, while sacrificing the other criminals_Vol-I.pdf (accessed August 6, 2012). 3 Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution, Extract from the Closing Brief Against Defendant Gebhardt. Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol.1, 358- 360, http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-I.pdf (accessed August 6, 2012),. 4 Michael H. Kater, Doctors Under Hitler, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), 252. 5 Ibid. 6 Kevin Passmore, Fascism: A Very Short Introduction, (New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2002), 10. entirely.7 Gender then, is the relationship between the roles of men and women, in addition to how these roles developed within a Nazi cultural context. In the cases studied by Wendy Lower and Irmtraud Heike, the expectations of female perpetrators differed greatly from those of men. Women were treated more harshly than men in post-war and legal contexts. At the same time, present day historians have also been guilty of gendering subjects and creating character assumptions based on gendered material. Michael Kater is a principal offender when concerning Oberheuser’s portrayal as an evil, single-mindedly driven, cold woman. Meanwhile, when considering Gebhardt as a subject, his masculinity is often explained through his military experiences, or through his work relationship with Herta Oberheuser. In many ways, using a gendered approach inextricably links these subjects together. Gebhardt’s masculinity is in part tied to Herta Oberheuser as he was the one to seek her out and take her on as his assistant. Herta Oberheuser’s portrayal during and after the war has a great deal to do with her medical past, a past she could not have lived were it not for the experiences made possible by Gebhardt. A gendered approach is also important in order to establish a clearer understanding of gender identity, particularly concerning Oberheuser. Bonnie Smith has argued that the gender characteristics of female professional historians, though the same is applicable to medical sciences at a university and professional level, were more blurred and has suggested that the identities of these past women academics could not be as neatly defined by the feminine and masculine dichotomy.8 As Oberheuser steps outside of typical feminine norms of behaviour, it is necessary to analyze how, why and to what degree she deviated from gendered norms. 7 Joan Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” The American Historical Review, vol. 91. 5 (1986), 1053-1075, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1864376 (Accessed January 28, 2013) 1054. 8 Bonnie Smith, The Gender of History: Men, Women, and Historical Practice, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 2000), 186. In terms of generational cohorts, it would be negligent to deny or ignore the impact of Gebhardt and Oberheuser’s upbringing on their medical crimes. Michael Wildt, Michael Mann and Hilary Earl have all clearly demonstrated that perpetrators, outside of their Nazi related killings, had ordinary lives with a few common, extraordinary factors that made entering the murderous ranks of the Nazi party less morally or ethically questionable. The frameworks expounded upon by Wildt, Mann, and Earl can be applied to the early lives of Oberheuser and Gebhardt. While Gebhardt can be considered an old fighter, a survivor of World War I, a student radical who attended the Nazi Putsch in 1923, and thus can easily be slotted into the existing framework, so too can Oberheuser, in spite of her gender and in spite of her lack of martial experience. Obviously too young to participate in the war, had her gender permitted, Oberheuser was old enough to witness her father leave for the front, she was old enough to recall the effects of the depression, and was just as vulnerable, via her relationship with her father and the result of the war, to fall victim to early Nazi propaganda. For the few reasons briefly listed above, biography is absolutely necessary to even begin understanding the motivations of perpetrators. Without biography, the actions carried out by Gebhardt and Oberheuser lack context. Regardless of deed, they are individuals who made decisions, were swayed, acted, reacted, and ultimately did so toward some end. For Gehhardt, the slide from healer to murderer was ideological. He bought into the ideology and as a result, he was able to carry out orders that moved him higher and higher in the Nazi hierarchy.
Recommended publications
  • Clauberg's Eponym and Crimes Against Humanity
    IMAJ • VOL 14 • deceMber 2012 FOCUS Clauberg’s Eponym and Crimes against Humanity Frederick Sweet PhD1 and Rita M. Csapó-Sweet EdD2 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA 2Department of Media Studies, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA discoverers. The eponym issue is less settled because the ABSTRACT: Scientific journals are ethically bound to cite Professor names had become part of medical literature [3-6]. Dr. Carl Clauberg’s Nazi medical crimes against humanity In 2007, Strous and Edelman [3] argued that eradicating whenever the eponym Clauberg is used. Modern articles Nazi doctor eponyms has become critical. They conceded that still publish the eponym citing only the rabbit bioassay used there might be arguments for preserving Nazi doctor eponyms in developing progesterone agonists or antagonists for in order to keep alive the memory of criminal medical behav- birth control. Clauberg’s Nazi career is traced to his having ior. Physicians need reminding how a few can darken their subjected thousands of Jewish women at the Ravensbruck profession by monstrously betraying medical ethics. Moreover, and Auschwitz-Birkenau death camps to cruel, murderous shockingly inhumane Nazi medical experiments associated sterilization experiments that are enthusiastically described with the perpetrators’ eponyms can help remind students of by incriminating letters (reproduced here) between him and lessons taught in medical ethics classes long after the classes the notorious Nazi Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler. The experiments were carried out in women’s block 10 in Auschwitz- have ended. Nevertheless, it was proposed [3]: Birkenau where Clauberg’s colleague Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Un Exemple De Résistance Dans Le Camp De Ravensbrück : Le Cas Des Polonaises Victimes D'expériences Pseudo-Médicales, 1942
    « Un exemple de résistance dans le camp de Ravensbrück : le cas des Polonaises victimes d’expériences pseudo-médicales, 1942-1945. Témoignage et analyse de Joanna Penson et Anise Postel-Vinay », Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société, N°5, mai-août 2008, www.histoire-politique.fr Un exemple de résistance dans le camp de Ravensbrück : le cas des Polonaises victimes d’expériences pseudo-médicales, 1942-1945. Témoignage et analyse de Joanna Penson et Anise Postel-Vinay Note de la Rédaction Il n’est pas fréquent de publier un texte mêlant témoignage et analyse dans une revue universitaire. Certaines actions, cependant, ne peuvent être connues que par le témoignage. Il en va souvent ainsi des activités clandestines. La résistance des Polonaises victimes d’expériences pseudo- médicales à Ravensbrück n’a laissé, comme document produit au moment des faits, que les listes de victimes contenues dans un bocal enterré et retrouvé en 1975 (voir ci-dessous note 10), ainsi que des photographies prises clandestinement et montrant les jambes des victimes infectées et mutilées. Les SS ayant brûlé presque toutes les archives du camp, il ne reste que très peu de traces écrites de leur côté. Les archives orales sont constituées d’une part par les dépositions des médecins accusés dans les procès organisés par les Alliés, et, d’autre part, par les témoignages des victimes et de leurs camarades. L’histoire de leur Résistance ne serait pas connue sans leur récit. Comme il est naturel pour des témoignages portant sur un événement collectif, les récits qui suivent incluent des précisions apportées par d’autres témoins oculaires.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America V. Erhard Milch
    War Crimes Trials Special List No. 38 Records of Case II United States of America v. Erhard Milch National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 1975 Special List No. 38 Nuernberg War Crimes Trials Records of Case II United States of America v. Erhard Milch Compiled by John Mendelsohn National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1975 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data United States. National Archives and Records Service. Nuernberg war crimes trial records. (Special list - National Archives and Records Service; no. 38) Includes index. l. War crime trials--N emberg--Milch case,l946-l947. I. Mendelsohn, John, l928- II. Title. III. Series: United States. National Archives and Records Service. Special list; no.38. Law 34l.6'9 75-6l9033 Foreword The General Services Administration, through the National Archives and Records Service, is· responsible for administering the permanently valuable noncurrent records of the Federal Government. These archival holdings, now amounting to more than I million cubic feet, date from the <;lays of the First Continental Congress and consist of the basic records of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of our Government. The presidential libraries of Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson contain the papers of those Presidents and of many of their - associates in office. These research resources document significant events in our Nation's history , but most of them are preserved because of their continuing practical use in the ordinary processes of government, for the protection of private rights, and for the research use of scholars and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy Nuremberg Trials
    Stiftelsen norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014 THE . ANATOMY OF THE NUREMBERG TRIALS A Personal Memoir ;~--.- C'J-1 le F of /J-Ic A Nc!2-t'c4 .0 rpf2oS':C cui()Q..,.S W l-njJ4Ct(r:;.CY~. TELFORD TAYLOR .------..------- The International Military Tribunal in session, summer 1946. National Archives ALFRED A. KNOPF New York SNO..----1992 Stiftelsen norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014 508 TilE ANATOMY OF TilE The Indicted Organizations in judgment.' The judgment of the Trib feature of the cross-examination was that virtually no mention of Gestapo ... The punishment must not be M.ueller occurred, despite Kaltenbrunner's frantic efforts to pin manv of the ~flmes .ch~rge~ against him on Mueller. If the Gestapo was in fact an orgalllzahon, presumably its Chief's crimes would be valuable in crimi­ nalizing the organization. In his final argument, Dr. Merkel spent little time on legal arguments and h.ad the good sense not to dispute Gestapo crimes that were proven and notoflOUS. He had some success in showing that there were many Gestapo 3 me~bers who had no part in the crimes. But Merkel put major emphasis The Tribunal next turned to what mi ht well be called the "Himmler on hiS final pages, pointing out particular sections of the Gestapo, including rganization 0 Groups," comprising both civil and military groups. Accord­ office employees, telephone operators, and other such categories, whom 'Illg to fhe Indictment, the charges were brought a ainst the Scliutzstaffel Justice Jackson had previously proposed to exempt from the Indictment. (Protection Squad) of the aZI arty, w ic Himmler had commanded since Merkel also mentioned administrative officials and technical employees 1929 and which includea the Wall en (armed) SS, which tought wtfh and whose work had nothing to do with police activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weapons Research on Soldiers and Concentration Camp Inmates in Nazi Germany
    Chemical Weapons Research on Soldiers and Concentration Camp Inmates in Nazi Germany Florian Schmaltz Abstract In 1944 and 1945 scientists and physicians in the Allied military intelligence gathered evidence on the criminal human experiments with chemical weapons con- ducted on inmates of the Nazi concentration camps in Sachsenhausen, Natzweiler, and Neuengamme during World War II. Some of the experiments were judged during the Nuremberg Medical Trial (Case I) and French military tribunals at Metz and Lyon after liberation. Based on this evidence and on further archival sources, this paper will examine the preconditions and settings of these experiments, the perpetrators involved, and what is known about their purpose and outcome. Furthermore, the paper will raise the question if and how the experiments in the concentration camps were linked to other experiments conducted in Nazi Germany for the Wehrmacht at military research establishments such as the Gas Protection Laboratory (Heeresgasschutzlaboratorium) in Spandau, the Militärärztliche Akademie, the Heeresversuchsstelle Raubkammer, or by universities. The paper will focus on experiments with chemical agents in German concentration camps and analyze how rivalry and division of labor between the military and the SS in human experimentation with chemical agents went hand in hand. 1 Organizational Structures of Chemical Warfare Research in Germany Chemical warfare research in military and academic contexts is generally an issue of secrecy. It encompasses screening, identification of potential chemical agents suitable for use as weapons, means and methods for their large-scale industrial production, storage and deployment, as well as defensive research in toxicology on animals and humans. It also includes possible medical prophylaxis and treatments, as well as measures and technologies for detecting chemical agents and protecting soldiers and civilians against the severe injuries and health risks involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Ethics in Nazi Germany
    History, Department of History Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2018 A Horrific Choice or Willing Complicity: Medical Ethics in Nazi Germany Hope Schulman [email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/history theses/27 A Horrific Choice or Willing Complicity: Medical Ethics in Nazi Germany Hope Schulman History 400: Research Seminar in Historical Method May 9, 2018 Schulman 1 Karl Gebhart began his testimony by stating, “By order of the Reich Leader SS, I started on July 20, 1942, at Ravensbruck concentration camp for women on a series of clinical experiments with the aim of analyzing the sickness known as gas gangrene... And to test the efficacy of the known therapeutic medicaments. In addition, the simple infections of injuries which occur as symptoms in war, surgery also had to be tested”1 Gebhart was a doctor in one of the concentration camps who performed experiments with sulfanilamide, an experimental drug, on Jewish patients to test cures for gangrene. Defendant Karl Gebhardt went on to testify in the Nuremberg Trials about the experiments he performed throughout the course of the Holocaust. He explained how he intensified the experiments since “no deaths had occurred,” using techniques to restrict blood flow so that the “gangrene infections” would be more severe. He nonchalantly explained the success of the experiments by stating, “This series of experiments resulted in very serious infections and a number of deaths occurred.”2 While this is just one account from one doctor, his statements are quite reflective of the actions and mindset, in terms of why doctors thought their actions were justified, of countless other doctors throughout the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Gebhardt Mail Addresses Personal Data Education Research
    Karl Gebhardt Herman and Joan Suit Professor of Astrophysics Mail Addresses University of Texas at Austin Residence: Astronomy Department 1808 Burbank Str 1UniversityStationC1400 Austin,TX78757 Austin, TX 78712-0259 Phone: (512)–471–1473 Fax: (512)–471–6016 Email: [email protected] URL: www.as.utexas.edu/∼ gebhardt/ Personal Data Birth: Easton, PA, Aug. 19, 1964 Current Status: Professor Education 1994, Ph.D. in Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University. 1990, M.S. Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 1986, B.S. Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. Research Experience 2006 – present Professor, University of Texas at Austin 2006 – present Project Scientist, Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment 2005 – 2010 Visiting Professor, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Extraterrestrische Physik 2004 – 2006 Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin 2000 – 2004 Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin 1997 – 2000 Hubble Fellow, University of California, Santa Cruz 1994 – 1997 Postdoctoral research, University of Michigan 1991 – 1994 Ph.D. research with Dr. C. Pryor and Dr. T.B. Williams 1987 – 1991 M.S. research with Dr. T.C. Beers at Michigan State University Honors and Awards 2016 Rutgers Distinguised Fellows, 250th Anniversary 2014 College of Natural Science Outreach Award 2012 Edith and Peter O’DonnellAward in Science from the Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas 2009 Herman and Joan Suit Professor of Astrophysics 2004 NSFCAREERAward 2004 Teaching Excellence Award, McDonald Board of Visitors 2003 Teaching Excellence Award, University of Texas 2003 Benjamin Dean Lecturer, Morrison Planetarium 2001 Invited talk at American Astronomical Society Meeting 1997 – 2000 Hubble Fellowship Karl Gebhardt October 9, 2017 1995 Recipient of the 1995 Northeastern Association of Graduate Schools Dissertation Award (2 per year in Science) 1991 – 1993 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrocity Film Abstract Keywords Full Text
    HOME ABOUT LOGIN CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES ANNOUNCEMENTS BOARD OPEN APPARATUS BOOKS Home > No 12 (2021) > Schmidt Atrocity Film Fabian Schmidt, Alexander Oliver Zöller Abstract What if the SS as the main Nazi organisation responsible for the Holocaust produced a secret !lm about the persecution and murder of the European Jews during World War 2? The essay discusses the possible production of a documentary !lm about the genocide, made by the perpetrators. In doing so, it challenges a set of assumptions that is commonly put into action against such an endeavour. By examining the various activities of private and o"cial photographers and cameramen in the context of the deportation and extermination of the European Jews and by drawing on contemporary sources which hint to such a – now lost – !lm project, the essay examines the available evidence and investigates comparable footage, arguing that the gaze of the perpetrators has long been part of our collective visual memory of the Holocaust. Keywords Holocaust, visual propaganda, documentary !lm, !lm archives, concentration camps, ghettos, Reichs!lmarchiv, Budd Schulberg Full Text: HTMLHTMLHTML DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17892/app.2021.00012.223http://dx.doi.org/10.17892/app.2021.00012.223http://dx.doi.org/10.17892/app.2021.00012.223 HTML http://dx.doi.org/10.17892/app.2021.00012.223 Apparatus. ISSN 2365-7758 Atrocity Film author: Fabian Schmidt and Alexander Oliver Zöller ​ ​ date: 2021 ​ issue: 12 ​ toc: yes ​ abstract: What if the SS as the main Nazi organisation responsible for the Holocaust ​ produced a secret film about the persecution and murder of the European Jews during World War 2? The essay discusses the possible production of a documentary film about the genocide, made by the perpetrators.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Against Humanity Matthew Lippman
    Boston College Third World Law Journal Volume 17 Article 1 Issue 2 International Law and Human Rights Edition 5-1-1997 Crimes Against Humanity Matthew Lippman Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Lippman, Crimes Against Humanity, 17 B.C. Third World L.J. 171 (1997), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj/vol17/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Third World Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY MATTHEW LIPPMAN* Crimes against humanity-inhumane acts or persecutions based on racial, religious or political grounds-constituted a revolutionary step in the evolution of international jurisprudence. This principle established that individuals and groups possess international legal per­ sonality and protection and that those who have drastically denigrated human dignity will be considered criminally culpable. The rights of individuals were thus determined to transcend culture and country borders, and public officials could no longer claim immunity for the mistreatment of those within their own or other States. Crimes against humanity provides a potentially potent principle in combating the current escalation of national conflict and strife. Practice, however, often fails to match potential. The turn towards the next century provides an opportunity to diagram the drafting, devel­ opment, and the next required step in the evolution of crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research
    Bretislav Friedrich · Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn · Florian Schmaltz · Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Bretislav Friedrich • Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn • Florian Schmaltz Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Editors Bretislav Friedrich Florian Schmaltz Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Max Planck Institute for the History of Society Science Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Dieter Hoffmann Martin Wolf Max Planck Institute for the History of Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Science Society Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Jürgen Renn Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin Germany ISBN 978-3-319-51663-9 ISBN 978-3-319-51664-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017941064 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncom- mercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]