The Shakers in Knox County OLIVERW

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Shakers in Knox County OLIVERW The Shakers in Knox County OLIVERW. ROBINSON Many people here in the Middle Wkst who maintain an interest in social experiments are familiar with the details of the New Harmony commune under the Rappites and later under the Owens, but few are aware that a somewhat similar commune under the Shakers existed at Busrol on the north- ern border of Knox County during the first three decades of the nineteenth century.2 Even the people who now live on the land still known as Shaker Prairie are for the most part vague as to who the Shakers really were and what they be- lieved.s The official name for the Shakers was the “United Society of the Believers in Christ‘s Second Appearing”. They were also known as “Aletheans”, or the “Millennia1 Church” ; but even the members of the society accepted the name “Shaker”, although it was originally applied to them in ridicule of certain spontaneous movements which formed a part of the ecstasy of their worship. Peaceful, idealistic, industrious people, they lived and worked together communistically in their thrifty little vil- lages, recognizing neither death nor marriage-all of which may seem extremely impractical and utopian. Yet in enforc- ing their opposition to marital love, the Shakers became real- istic enough to house the sexes in separate dormitories. The earliest cabins built by the Shaker apostles, who came from Ohio to the Knox-Sullivan County border in 1808, were arranged to encourage celiba~y,~,and the entire mode of living was planned accordingly. A few quotations from the “Rules of Propriety” will better develop this point: Brethren and sisters should not pass each other on the stairs . but when in company with each other, the brethren should go up- stairs first, and the sisters go down-stairs first. Brethren and sisters should not visit each other’s apartments late in the evening. When sisters walk in the fields, gardens, barns, or to the brethren’s *Located sixteen miles north of Vincennes and two miles east of the Wabash on Busseron Creek. The settlement was colloquially known a8 Shakertown. AUaa of Knox CuuRty, published ci~ca1880. PZbid. The lands on which the Shaker community was located were partb in Sullivan County. Only the Shaker name persists. 4Georee E. Greene, History of Vimennes and Knoz Count# (Chicago, 1911). 373. Shakers in Knox County 35 shops, there should be at least two in the company, and it is no less important when they ride in a carriage.5 Just how efficiently some of those Shaker precautions oper- ated at Busro we shall see later! The Shakers further believed in common ownership of property; in the dignity of labor for every member, regard- less of how high or how low his position might be in the re- ligious organization ; in complete abstinence from tobacco and liquor, except for medical use; in vegetarianism; and in a plain, uniform style of dress-subdued colors, with white handkerchiefs and caps for the women, and loose, coarse suits for the men, whose hair was usually worn long on the neck and cut off in short bangs across the forehead. The preceding summary of characteristics no doubt ap- pears simple enough, but actually to understand the Shaker conception of life it is necessary to go briefly into the history and tenets of their religion. The founder of the sect was Ann Lee, who was born in England on February 29, 1736. The daughter of a blacksmith who lived in Toad Lane, Manches- ter, she had little if any opportunity for education and went as a child to work in the cotton mills. Even so, in spite of her humble origin, she was able-through a strong will and an effective tongue-to exert a surprising amount of in- fluence over her associates. After marrying a blacksmith named Stanley and losing her four children in early infancy, she turned her at- tention to religion and became a believer in a certain Jane Wardlaw of Bolton-on-the-Moors, Lancashire, who was prophesying that Christ would soon return to earth in the form of a woman-as David had suggested in the Psalms. Immediately, Ann Lee began to preach the same doctrine in Toad Lane, and was so successful in collecting street crowds that she was arrested and imprisoned for two weeks at Old Bailey in Manchester, the charges being “dancing, shouting, and blaspheming on the Sabbath” and obstructing the thor- oughfare.e Upon her release, she reported that one night during her imprisonment her cell had been filled with heav- 6Quoted in The Literary Digest Sept. 30, 1922. The original Rules may be found in various editions of the dompendium of the Origin History Principles Rules and Regzrlations, Government and Doctrines of the United Societu ‘of Believer; in Christ’s Second Appearing. Other specimen rules are: “Shake your bed-clothes separately and air your bed every morning so that the effete matter that has been thrown off from the body may escape and not remain to he again absorbed by the imphatics . Never eat what you do not need because it pleases your taste. It is better to bear the cross and be saved from dyspepsia.” 6 Encyclopaedia Britannia (eleventh edition), 36 Indiana Magazine of History enly light and Christ had united with her both in form and in spirit and was thereafter to reign on earth through her- Ann Lee. This story, regardless of her previous success, was too great a taxation on the faith of Toad Lane. Consequently, after considerable jeering and mud-throwing had been direct- ed toward her, she had another vision in which she was advised to go to America. Accompanied by seven disciples-two women and five men besides her husband-she reached New York shortly before the beginning of the Revolutionary War. Not liking the city, she moved into the country, and with her disciples founded the settlement of Watervliet, near Albany, New York. There, for three and a half years, she waited passively for converts. In the meantime her husband left her, when she began to enforce celibacy on the grounds that men must live as the angels live without any form of earthly love. Ap- parently Mr. Stanley was only a blacksmith with little ap- preciation of angelic conduct. In other respects, the long period of waiting was success- ful. Finally, as the result of a religious revival in the vicinity of Albany, Joseph Meacham, a Baptist minister from En- field, Connecticut, and Lucy Wright came to Watervliet to see what Ann Lee had to offer in the way of spiritual satis- faction. They immediately became converts and in turn won other converts so that a second settlement of the followers of Ann Lee came into existence at Mount Lebanon, which is now considered the parent colony. By this time Ann Lee was known as “Mother Ann” and her followers as “Shakers.” During the Revolution, since she denounced war, refused to take the Colonial oaths, and forbade her men to serve on juries,? she was for several months imprisoned in Pough- keepsie under suspicion of being a British spy. This circum- stance, though at first discouraging, really turned out to her great advantage-for much publicity was attached to the imprisonment of “the female Christ”.* After her release in 1780, she made a rather successful missionary and faith- healing tour through New England which resulted eventually in the formation of eleven additional societies. That tour proved to be the climax of Ann Lee’s career. In 1783, she returned to Watervliet, and about a year later 7 Even in recent times Shakers declined the privilege of voting. 8 Dictionary of Ammimn Biography. Shakers in Knoz County 37 died there. Many of her followers were somewhat surprised, for they had expected Mother Ann to live forever, but Joseph Meacham and Lucy Wright-to whom Ann Lee had given over all authority shortly before her death-ably explained that Mother Ann had not ceased to live among her people but that clothed in new glory she was still visible to those who had attained the proper degree of grace. Meachani and Miss Wright then proceded to draw up a definite covenant concerning the beliefs and social system of all Shakers. Nany of the tenets of the covenant appear to have originated directly from Ann Lee’s life, her ministry, and her theories: namely, that the godhead is both male and female; that Christ in the person of Mother Ann has returned to earth to establish a kingdom of heaven; that the believer -after confessing his sins-is already in heaven, where there is no death and no marriage; that the body is not resurrect- ed but that those who “have passed from sight” are still in communion with all believers; that active evangelism is un- necessary since God will attract converts when they are needed ; and that labor is a sacred privilege.9 In 1796, Joseph Meacham died, but Lucy Wright and others of the faith efficiently carried on the organization and promulgated the doctrine as opportunity presented itself. Soon after 1800, Archibald Meacham and Issachar Bates, as missionaries, came to Ohio and organized several societies, the most important of which was at Union Village in Warren County.lo In 1808, they visited Knox County, Indiana, where they purchased 1300 acres of land, mostly in Busseron Town- ship, from Robert Huston and Joseph Worthington.ll The ori- ginal group of Shaker colonists at Busro-as the settlement was officially named-numbered only two dozen, but their ag- ricultural success soon attracted several local residents,I2 and, finally augmented in 1811 by a substantial influx of members of the society from Eagle Creek, Adams County, Ohio, the total number at Busro reached 300.1a BEncr~clopaedia Britannfca.
Recommended publications
  • Shakers and Jerkers: Letters from the "Long Walk," 1805, Part I Douglas L
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Religious Studies Faculty Publications Religious Studies 2017 Shakers and Jerkers: Letters from the "Long Walk," 1805, Part I Douglas L. Winiarski University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/religiousstudies-faculty- publications Part of the Christianity Commons, and the New Religious Movements Commons Recommended Citation Winiarski, Douglas L. "Shakers and Jerkers: Letters from the "Long Walk," 1805, Part I." Journal of East Tennessee History 89 (2017): 90-110. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Religious Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shakers and Jerkers: Letters from the “Long Walk,” 1805, Part 1 By Douglas L. Winiarski*a Reports of a bizarre new religious phenomenon made their way over the mountains from Tennessee during the summer and fall of 1804. For several years, readers in the eastern states had been eagerly consuming news of the Great Revival, the powerful succession of Presbyterian sacramental festivals and Methodist camp meetings that played a formative role in the development of the southern Bible Belt and the emergence of early American evangelicalism. Letters from the frontier frequently included vivid descriptions of the so-called “falling exercise,” in which the bodies of revival converts crumpled to the ground during powerful sermon performances on the terrors of hell. But an article that appeared in the Virginia Argus on October 24, 1804, announced the sudden emergence of a deeply troubling new form of convulsive somatic distress.
    [Show full text]
  • Me0330data.Pdf
    SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS ME-227 State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 HABS ME-227 New Gloucester vicinity Cumberland County Maine PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 Location: State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 New Gloucester vicinity, Cumberland County, Maine The village is located on the east and west sides of State Route 26 Note: For shelving purposes at the Library of Congress, Cumberland County was selected as the main location for Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village. A portion of the village is also located in Androscoggin County. USGS Gray, Mechanic Falls, Minot, Raymond, Maine Quadrangles Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates (NAD83): NW 38711.37 4874057.31 NE 393479.37 487057.18 SE 393477.82 4868742.10 SW 387411.86 486742.35 Present Owner: The Shaker Society (The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing) Present Occupant: Members of the Shaker Society Present Use: Communal Shaker working village and museum Significance: This is the world’s only remaining active Shaker village community that reflects the evolution of Shaker religion and architecture from the late eighteenth century to the present. SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 (Page 2) PART I: HISTORICAL INFORMATION A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. Historical Development: The United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing at Sabbathday Lake, Maine is the world's only remaining active Shaker community.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ INAME HISTORIC Hancock Shaker Village__________________________________ AND/ORCOMMON Hancock Shaker Village STREET & NUMBER Lebanon Mountain Road ("U.S. Route 201 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Hancock/Pittsfield _. VICINITY OF 1st STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Massachusetts 025 Berkshire 003 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT _PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED X_AGRICULTURE -XMUSEUM __BUILDING(S) X.RRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK _ STRUCTURE __BOTH XXWORK IN PROGRESS ^EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS XXXYES . RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Shaker Community, Incorporated fprincipal owner) STREET& NUMBER P.O. Box 898 CITY. TOWN STATE Pittsfield VICINITY OF Mas s achus e 1.1. LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEoaETc. Berkshire County Registry of Deeds, Middle District STREETS NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Pittsfield Massachusetts REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey DATE 1931, 1959, 1945, 1960, 1962 ^FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY ._LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress, Division of Prints and Photographs CITY, TOWN STATE Washington DC DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X_EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED .^ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS XXALTERED - restored —MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Hancock Shaker Village is located on a 1,000-acre tract of land extending north and south of Lebanon Mountain Road (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustee's Building, Canterbury Shaker Village
    NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES State of New Hampshire, Department of Cultural Resources 603-271-3483 19 Pillsbury Street, 2 nd floor, Concord NH 03301-3570 603-271-3558 Voice/ TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964 FAX 603-271-3433 http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr [email protected] REPORT ON THE TRUSTEES’ BUILDING CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE CANTERBURY, NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES L. GARVIN 18 NOVEMBER 2001 Summary: The Trustees’ Building or office of the Church Family at Canterbury Shaker Village was the chief point of contact and commerce between the Church Family and the World. The building was the first and only brick structure built by the Church Family, and was constructed of materials of exceptional quality and workmanship. Built with fine bricks that were manufactured by the Shakers, the Trustees’ Building reveals much about the Shakers’ skill as brickmakers and as masons. The Trustees’ Building is a structure of statewide significance in the history of masonry construction in New Hampshire. Although built between 1830 and 1832, when the federal style was quickly waning and giving way to the Greek Revival in neighboring communities, the Trustees’ Building is stylistically conservative. Its interior detailing reflects the federal style, as modified and refined by the Shakers, more fully than any other structure at the village and perhaps more fully than any other Shaker building in New Hampshire. The structure therefore possesses stylistic significance as a document of the Shakers’ adoption and modification of an architectural style that was prevalent in the World. The building’s significance in technology, workmanship, and style would make the structure individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places if it were evaluated alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S
    • THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ARCHIVES & RESEARCH CENTER Guide to Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S.Coll.1 by Anne Mansella & Sarah Hayes August 2018 The processing of this collection was funded in part by Mass Humanities, which receives support from the Massachusetts Cultural Council and is an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Archives & Research Center 27 Everett Street, Sharon, MA 02067 www.thetrustees.org [email protected] 781-784-8200 The Trustees of Reservations – www.thetrustees.org Date Contents Box Folder/Item No. Extent: 15 boxes (includes 2 oversize boxes) Linear feet: 15 Copyright © 2018 The Trustees of Reservations ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION PROVENANCE Manuscript materials were first acquired by Clara Endicott Sears beginning in 1918 for her Fruitlands Museum in Harvard, Massachusetts. Materials continued to be collected by the museum throughout the 20th century. In 2016, Fruitlands Museum became The Trustees’ 116th reservation, and the Shaker manuscript materials were relocated to the Archives & Research Center in Sharon, Massachusetts. In Harvard, the Fruitlands Museum site continues to display the objects that Sears collected. The museum features three separate collections of significant Shaker, Native American, and American art and artifacts, as well as a historic farmhouse that was once home to the family of Louisa May Alcott and is recognized as a National Historic Landmark. OWNERSHIP & LITERARY RIGHTS The Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection is the physical property of The Trustees of Reservations. Literary rights, including copyright, belong to the authors or their legal heirs and assigns. RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS This collection is open for research. Some items may be restricted due to handling condition of materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 9 Number 1 Pages 3-39 January 2015 Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Stephen J. Paterwic Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Paterwic: Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God By Stephen J. Paterwic A review of: Shaker Autobiographies, Biographies and Testimonies, 1806-1907, edited by Glendyne R. Wergland and Christian Goodwillie. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014. 3 volume set. Let the Shakers Speak for Themselves In 1824 teenager Mary Antoinette Doolittle felt drawn to the Shakers and sought every opportunity to obtain information about them. By chance, while visiting her grandmother, she encountered two young women who had just left the New Lebanon community. “Mary” was thrilled with the opportunity to hear them tell their story.1 Suddenly “something like a voice” said to her, “Why listen to them? Go to the Shakers, visit, see and learn for yourself who and what they are!”2 This idea is echoed in the testimony of Thomas Stebbins of Enfield, Connecticut, who was not satisfied to hear about the Shakers. “But I had a feeling to go and see them, and judge for myself.” (1:400) Almost two hundred years later, this is still the best advice for people seeking to learn about the Shakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bates Descendants Who Have Had Little Or No Knowledge of Their Forebears
    ANCESTRAL LINEAGE Mildred Olive Sates McCann Prince Adair George County County Iowa Virginia WITH INDEX FOREWORD The initial u.ndertaking was precisely as indicated by title of this brochure; but, in developing that project, we encountered a medley of collateral•information, the discarding of which would be u.nholy, We decided to merge a mass of information into a pot pouri, which has overtaxed our abilities to assemble into an order­ ly genealogical exposition. The product which we apologetically submit is a mixed mass of genealogy, biography, and documentation, which defies orderly presentation, Nevertheless, we hope that our efforts.will be re­ vealing to the many Bates descendants who have had little or no knowledge of their forebears. Perhaps our endeavor would be more appropriately titled SOME DESCENDANTS OF CLEMENT BATES, COLONIST OF COHASSET, MASSACHUSETTS. His blood runs to a progeny of more than six hundred, recorded in these pages, and scattered from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from Canada to Texas. To Pauline Shaffer Bates of Cody, Wyoming, to Marian Booth Coolidge of Houston, Texas, and her sister Margaret Booth Heroy of Dallas, Texas, to Annabel Smith Horner of Tulsa, Oklahoma, to Alberta T. Main of Washington, D. C., and to Marian Shaffer Steele of Roswell, Georgia, we acknowledge their unstinted aid and assistance in the preparation of this pamphlet; and in the text we have duly credited individuals who have contri­ buted special information beyond their particular familieso Virginia Wilhelm Graham William Ray McCann Cresskill, New Jersey Hopewell, Virginia 1964 Ancestors in England . • • • • • • • • • . 1 Clement and Ann Bates-Colonists, 1635 .
    [Show full text]
  • Guide I Bound Manuscripts
    VOLUME I GUIDE TO BOUND SHAKER MANUSCRIPTS IN THE LIBRARY COLLECTION OF HANCOCK SHAKER VILLAGE Pittsfield, Massachusetts, 2001 Compiled and annotated by Dr. Magda Gabor-Hotchkiss Retired Coordinator of Library Collections Copyright © 2001 Hancock Shaker Village, Inc. CONTENTS PREPARER’S NOTE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ORIGINAL BOUND MANUSCRIPTS ALFRED 2 ENFIELD, CT 2 GROVELAND, NY 3 HANCOCK, MA 3 HARVARD, MA 6 MOUNT LEBANON, NY 8 TYRINGHAM, MA 20 UNION VILLAGE, OH 21 UNKNOWN COMMUNITIES 21 COPIED BOUND MANUSCRIPTS CANTERBURY, NH 23 ENFIELD, CT 24 HANCOCK, MA 24 HARVARD, MA 26 MOUNT LEBANON, NY 27 NORTH UNION, OH 30 PLEASANT HILL, KY 31 SOUTH UNION, KY 32 WATERVLIET, NY 33 UNKNOWN COMMUNITY 34 MISCELLANEOUS 35 PREPARER'S NOTE: THE BOUND SHAKER MANUSCRIPTS A set of most remarkable documents, handwritten by the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing, more commonly called the Shakers, was produced by their leaders, Elders of their Central (Lead), Bishopric, and Family Ministries; their Deacons, in charge of production of an endless variety of goods; their Trustees, in charge of their financial affairs. Thus these manuscripts - Ministerial and Family journals, yearbooks, diaries, Covenants, hymnals, are invaluable documents illuminating the concepts and views of Shakers on their religion, theology, music, spiritual life and visions, and their concerns and activities in community organization, membership, daily events, production of goods, financial transactions between Shaker societies and the outside world, their crafts and industries. For information pertaining to specific communities and Shaker individuals, only reference works that were most frequently used are listed: Index of Hancock Shakers - Biographical References, by Priscilla Brewer; Shaker Cities of Peace, Love, and Union: A History of the Hancock Bishopric, by Deborah E.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 5 Number 3 Pages 11-137 July 2011 Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Galen Beale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Beale: Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith By Galen Beale And as she turned and looked at an apple tree in full bloom, she exclaimed: — How beautiful this tree looks now! But some of the apples will soon fall off; some will hold on longer; some will hold on till they are half grown and will then fall off; and some will get ripe. So it is with souls that set out in the way of God. Many set out very fair and soon fall away; some will go further, and then fall off, some will go still further and then fall; and some will go through.1 New England was a hotbed of discontent in the second half of the eighteenth century. Both civil and religious events stirred its citizenry to action. Europeans wished to govern this new, resource-rich country, causing continual fighting, and new religions were springing up in reaction to the times. The French and Indian War had aligned the British with the colonists, but that alliance soon dissolved as the British tried to extract from its colonists the cost of protecting them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Family Orchard of the Watervliet Shaker Community
    The Church Family Orchard of the Watervliet Shaker Community Elizabeth Shaver Illustrations by Elizabeth Lee PUBLISHED BY THE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY 25 MEETING HOUSE ROAD ALBANY, N. Y. 12211 www.shakerheritage.org MARCH, 1986 UPDATED APRIL, 2020 A is For Apple 3 Preface to 2020 Edition Just south of the Albany International called Watervliet, in 1776. Having fled Airport, Heritage Lane bends as it turns from persecution for their religious beliefs from Ann Lee Pond and continues past an and practices, the small group in Albany old cemetery. Between the pond and the established the first of what would cemetery is an area of trees, and a glance eventually be a network of 22 communities reveals that they are distinct from those in the Northeast and Midwest United growing in a natural, haphazard fashion in States. The Believers, as they called the nearby Nature Preserve. Evenly spaced themselves, had broken away from the in rows that are still visible, these are apple Quakers in Manchester, England in the trees. They are the remains of an orchard 1750s. They had radical ideas for the time: planted well over 200 years ago. the equality of men and women and of all races, adherence to pacifism, a belief that Both the pond, which once served as a mill celibacy was the only way to achieve a pure pond, and this orchard were created and life and salvation, the confession of sins, a tended by the people who now rest in the devotion to work and collaboration as a adjacent cemetery, which dates from 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaker Claim to America
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hamilton Digital Commons (Hamilton College) American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 6 Number 2 Pages 93-111 April 2012 “The mighty hand of overruling providence”: The Shaker Claim to America Jane F. Crosthwaite Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. “The mighty hand of overruling providence”: The Shaker Claim to America Cover Page Footnote Portions of this paper were delivered at the Communal Studies Association meeting at the Shaker Village at South Union at Auburn, Kentucky, on September 30, 2011. A Winterthur Research Fellowship allowed me to complete research on this project. This articles and features is available in American Communal Societies Quarterly: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq/vol6/iss2/6 Crosthwaite: “The mighty hand of overruling providence” “The mighty hand of overruling providence”: The Shaker Claim to America1 By Jane F. Crosthwaite Since Ann Lee and her small band of followers landed in New York in 1774, they and the Believers who came after them have been objects of curiosity for their American neighbors; they have known derision, respect, fear, and interested wonder. They were viewed as heretics, but saw themselves as orthodox; they were persecuted but saw themselves as triumphant. They built separate communities, but expected the world’s people to unite with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Community, Equality, Simplicity, and Charity the Hancock Shaker Village
    Community, equality, simplicity, and charity Studying and visiting various forms of religion gives one a better insight to the spiritual, philosophical, physical, cultural, social, and psychological understanding about human behavior and the lifestyle of a particular group. This photo program is about the Hancock Shaker Village, a National Historic Landmark in Pittsfield, Massachusetts. The Village includes 20 historic buildings on 750 acres. The staff provide guests with a great deal of insight to the spiritual practices and life among the people called Shakers. Their famous round stone barn is a major attraction at the Village. It is a marvelous place to learn about Shaker life. BACKGROUND “The Protestant Reformation and technological advances led to new Christian sects outside of the Catholic Church and mainstream Protestant denominations into the 17th and 18th centuries. The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, commonly known as the Shakers, was a Protestant sect founded in England in 1747. The French Camisards and the Quakers, two Protestant denominations, both contributed to the formation of Shaker beliefs.” <nps.gov/articles/history-of-the-shakers.htm> “In 1758 Ann Lee joined a sect of Quakers, known as the Shakers, that had been heavily influenced by Camisard preachers. In 1770 she was imprisoned in Manchester for her religious views. During her brief imprisonment, she received several visions from God. Upon her release she became known as “Mother Ann.” “In 1772 Mother Ann received another vision from God in the form of a tree. It communicated that a place had been prepared for she and her followers in America.
    [Show full text]