Kneller and Mccaffrey Rent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kneller and Mccaffrey Rent THE INTERPRETATION OF VERTICAL SEQUENCES IN TURBIDITE BEDS: THE INFLUENCE OF LONGITUDINAL FLOW STRUCTURE BENJAMIN C. KNELLER1 AND WILLIAM D. MCCAFFREY2 1 Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, U.S.A. email: [email protected] 2 School of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K. ABSTRACT: Because turbidite beds aggrade progressively beneath a Weisbrich et al. 1981) and is generally considered to occur in nature (Bou- moving current, the vertical grain-size pro®le of a bed is generally an ma 1964; Stow et al. 1996, and references therein, cf. Shanmugam 1997). indication of the longitudinal velocity structure of the ¯ow, and lon- Lastly, sediment may be deposited directly from suspension (``direct gitudinal gradients in suspended sediment concentration (``density''). suspension sedimentation'' of Lowe 1982) without any intervening traction, A current is more likely to show a simple waning ¯ow history farther even where the grain-size and shear stress are such that traction is poten- from its source; this is because faster-moving parts of the ¯ow overtake tially possible. This occurs when the ¯ux of material from suspension to slower moving parts, and the ¯ow organizes itself over time so that the the bed is so rapid as to preclude any tractional transport (Middleton 1967; fastest parts are at the front. Thus distal (e.g., basin plain) turbidites Lowe 1988; Arnott and Hand 1989; Vrolijk and Southard 1997) and results commonly show simple, normally graded pro®les, whereas more prox- in structureless deposits (Lowe 1988; Kneller and Branney 1995). imal turbidites often show complex vertical sequences within a bed, related to unsteadiness. A turbidity current may deposit a structure- Origin of Vertical Bed Pro®les less, poorly sorted bed where the capacity of the current is exceeded, i.e., where there is insuf®cient turbulent kinetic energy to maintain the Static settling can result in subtle normal grain-size grading in ®ne- entire suspended mass. Capacity-driven deposition may occur where grained turbidites or in the ®ne-grained tops of coarser turbidites, as a result the ¯ow decelerates. Where ¯ow nonuniformity is the cause of capacity- of differences in settling velocities of different grain-size fractions (e.g., driven deposition, a massive interval will form the lowest part of the Stow and Shanmugam 1980). Normal size grading in the sand fraction also bed, and will have a ¯at base. Where ¯ow unsteadiness is the cause, a has been ascribed to differences in the time taken for grains of different normally graded massive interval may overlie erosional features or sizes to settle through the ¯ow as a result of different settling velocities traction structures at the base of the bed. Based on the assumption of (Lowe 1982; Shanmugam 1997) once all turbulent support has decayed. longitudinal gradients in velocity, density, and grain-size distribution, This is more or less equivalent to static settling, and may be the case where the longitudinal density structure of a current may induce a switch, at the loss of grain support is virtually instantaneous, i.e., the ¯ow ``col- any given point, from capacity-driven deposition to either (1) bypass lapses.'' Flow collapse requires large spatial velocity gradients, either and resuspension, (2) bypass with traction, or (3) competence-driven where the ¯ow is completely blocked (i.e., has stopped more or less in- deposition, each resulting in a characteristic upward change in deposit stantaneously) or where there are rapid changes in slope or con®nement. character. The temporal evolution of the ¯ow at a point varies system- In this situation, all the grains, regardless of settling velocity, are falling atically in a streamwise sense. Taking account of these longitudinal towards the bed, and the resultant grading is simply a consequence of the variations permits predictions of complex vertical sequences within fact that the average time taken for ®ner grains to reach the bed is longer beds, and of their downstream relations. than that for coarser grains. Where the ¯ow has more or less come to rest, the dominant vertical particle ¯ux is likely to produce convective settling in which the downward movement of sediment occurs in downward-con- INTRODUCTION vecting cells (essentially vertical gravity currents) separated by regions of Turbidites are the deposits of submerged gravity-driven turbid suspen- upward-convecting lower concentration suspension (Kuenen 1968). The de- sions of ¯uid (usually water) and sediment. Deposition from turbidity cur- posit is likely to be poorly sorted at the base, with sorting improving up- rents occurs when the ¯uid and suspended sediment move down a gradient wards. This process can result in a normally graded bed only where the in shear velocity (generally equivalent to a velocity gradient). This can ¯ow is a single surge, because continuous ¯ow must eventually result in a arise when the velocity decreases spatially (for example due to decrease in uniform downward grain ¯ux for all grain sizes. This is a fundamentally slope, ¯ow expansion, or reduced sediment load), or temporally (due to different process than the generation of normal grading by a waning cur- ¯uctuations in supply rate), or both (Kneller 1995; Kneller and McCaffrey rent. In the latter case, any grains that have not reached their suspension 1995). threshold may still be fully supported by the turbulence, and the generation Deposition of sediment from turbidity currents may occur in several of normal grading is entirely governed by the progressive decline in bed ways. Sediment may settle from a virtually static suspension once the cur- shear stress as the ¯ow wanes. With suf®ciently small rates of decline, the rent has come to rest or slowed to the point where turbulence is inadequate deposit may be well sorted throughout, showing distribution grading. to maintain the grains in suspension. This is the mechanism by which much However, because turbidity currents sensu stricto deposit progressively mud is deposited from turbidity currents, because the bed shear stress re- and not en masse (Hiscott et al. 1997; Kneller and Buckee 2000), it follows quired to keep such material in suspension is so small that only a virtual that the vertical sequence of grain-size and sedimentary structures in a bed absence of current will allow deposition to take place (although ¯occulated records the time history of ¯ow conditions and bedforms. This idea was clay may behave as coarser silt particles; Stow and Bowen 1980). explored by Myrow and Southard (1991, 1996) for storm deposits to show Alternatively, sediment may accrete to the bed in much the same way the potential variability of vertical sequences. In all cases (including that as it does beneath dilute shear ¯ows, falling from suspension beneath a of ¯ow ``collapse''), the succession of grain-sizes through the bed records moving current and experiencing a period of traction on the bed before the temporal evolution of the ¯ow passing a ®xed point. In the case of coming to rest. Such sedimentation, which produces sedimentary structures suspension fallout with traction, the progressive aggradation is recorded by such as parallel lamination and ripple cross-lamination in the resulting bed, the sequence of traction structures, whereas in the case of direct suspension has been demonstrated experimentally (e.g., Kuenen 1966; Luethi 1981; sedimentation it may be cryptic in the sense that no sedimentary structures JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH,VOL. 73, NO.5,SEPTEMBER, 2003, P. 706±713 Copyright q 2003, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) 1527-1404/03/073-706/$03.00 INFLUENCE OF LONGITUDINAL FLOW STRUCTURE ON TURBIDITES 707 FIG. 2.ÐNormally graded turbidite bed forming a Bouma sequence, produced by deposition from waning ¯ow (Peira Cava Sandstones, Oligocene, southern France). LONGITUDINAL VELOCITY STRUCTURE OF CURRENTS Flow unsteadiness consists of variations in ¯ow velocity with time as FIG. 1.ÐSchematic diagram of ¯ow velocity structure. A) De®nition sketch for seen at a ®xed point (Fig. 1A). All turbulent ¯ows are inherently unsteady steady and unsteady ¯ow. B) Longitudinal velocity structure at four different times for surging ¯ow; time 1 shows the ¯ow structure at an early time for an initially on short time scales because of the presence of large eddies and internal slow ¯ow followed by a surge of higher velocity than the initial current; times 2 waves (Kneller et al. 1997; Kneller et al. 1999). These can produce ¯uc- through 4 illustrate the eventual progression of the surge to the front of the current tuations in the style of deposition, or alternations between deposition and with time. C) Time series of current velocity for the surging current in a proximal erosion, during the passage of a single current. The result is diffuse band- position (waxing then waning ¯ow). D) Time series of current velocity for the ing, or internal scour surfaces (Lowe 1982; Hiscott 1994b). Over longer surging current in a distal position (entirely waning ¯ow). time scales, turbidity currents may remain quasi-steady for periods of hours to perhaps weeks (Lambert and Giovanoli 1988; Piper et al. 1988; Piper and Savoye 1993), or they may wane with time, particularly if triggered are preserved and there is consequently no direct record of bed aggradation, by catastrophic failure of the slope or a shelf-edge delta. Turbidity currents per se (Kneller and Branney 1995). related to ¯oods, or those that experience surging, may also have waxing phases. Relation to Flow Structure Waning Flow Not only do turbidites aggrade progressively, they generally do so be- The ¯ow unsteadiness at the point of initiation of a current translates neath a moving current. The lowest parts of beds are deposited from rel- into a longitudinal velocity structure. Currents generated by catastrophic atively frontal parts of ¯ows, and successively higher parts of the bed are failures are likely to take the form of ®nite volume releases (as modeled deposited from successively more hindward parts of ¯ows.
Recommended publications
  • A Few Months-Old Storm-Generated Turbidite Deposited in the Capbreton Canyon (Bay of Biscay, SW France)
    Geo-Marine Letters DOI 10.1007/s003670100077 A few months-old storm-generated turbidite deposited in the Capbreton Canyon (Bay of Biscay, SW France) T. Mulder( ) · O. Weber · P. Anschutz · F. J. Jorissen · J.-M. Jouanneau T. Mulder · O. Weber · P. Anschutz · F.J. Jorissen · J.-M. Jouanneau Département de Géologie et Océanographie, UMR 5805 EPOC, Université Bordeaux I, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence cedex, France E-mail: [email protected] Received: 22 January 2001 / Revision accepted: 20 July 2001 / Published online: Abstract. A gravity core taken in the canyon of Capbreton shows a succession of sedimentary facies which can be interpreted as three superimposed Bouma sequences. The turbiditic sequences are covered by an oxidised layer which contains live benthic foraminiferal faunas indicating a reprisal of hemipelagic deposition. Activities of 234 Th and 210 Pb suggest that the most recent turbidite was deposited between early December 1999 and mid-January 2000. During this period, the most probable natural event able to trigger a turbidity current was the violent storm which affected the French Atlantic coast on 27 December 1999. The turbidity current could have been caused by a sediment failure due to an excess in pore pressure generated by the storm waves, an increase of the littoral drift, or the dissipation of the along-coast water bulge through the canyon. This sub-Recent turbidite shows that the canyon experiences modern gravity processes, despite the lack of a direct connection with a major sediment source. Introduction Although turbidity currents and turbidites have been known for half a century (Kuenen 1951, 1952a, 1952b, 1953, 1959; Bouma 1962), much controversy still exists concerning the processes of deposition (Kneller and Branney 1995; Shanmugam 1997, 2000; Mulder and Alexander 2001), their origin (Mulder and Cochonat 1996) and their recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado, U.S.A
    Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2008, v. 78, 0–0 Research Articles DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2008.052 DEPOSITS FROM WAVE-INFLUENCED TURBIDITY CURRENTS: PENNSYLVANIAN MINTURN FORMATION, COLORADO, U.S.A. 1 2 2 3 2 M. P. LAMB, P. M. MYROW, C. LUKENS, K. HOUCK, AND J. STRAUSS 1Department of Earth & Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. 2Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, U.S.A. 3Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, 80217-3363 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Turbidity currents generated nearshore have been suggested to be the source of some sandy marine event beds, but in most cases the evidence is circumstantial. Such flows must commonly travel through a field of oscillatory flow caused by wind-generated waves; little is known, however, about the interactions between waves and turbidity currents. We explore these interactions through detailed process-oriented sedimentological analysis of sandstone event beds from the Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation in north-central Colorado, U.S.A. The Minturn Formation exhibits a complex stratigraphic architecture of fan-delta deposits that developed in association with high topographic relief in a tectonically active setting. An , 20–35-m- thick, unconformity-bounded unit of prodelta deposits consists of dark green shale and turbidite-like sandstone beds with tool marks produced by abundant plant debris. Some of the sandstone event beds, most abundant at distal localities, contain reverse- to-normal grading and sequences of sedimentary structures that indicate deposition from waxing to waning flows. In contrast, proximal deposits, in some cases less than a kilometer away, contain abundant beds with evidence for deposition by wave- dominated combined flows, including large-scale hummocky cross-stratification (HCS).
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico
    Report of Investigations No. 201 Stratigraphic Analysis of the Upper Devonian Woodford Formation, Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico John B. Comer* *Current address Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 47405 1991 Bureau of Economic Geology • W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-7508 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................5 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................................5 Age and Correlation ........................................................................................................6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................6 Western Outcrop Belt ......................................................................................................6 Central Texas ...................................................................................................................7 Northeastern Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, Vol. 35/1-2, Pp. 19-23
    Soft sediment deformation structures in Silurian turbidites from North Greenland POUL-HENRIK LARSEN Larsen, P.-H.: Soft sediment deformation structures in Silurian turbidites from North Greenland. Bull, DGF geol. Soc. Denmark, vol. 35, pp. 19-23, Copenhagen, October, 29th, 1986. Turbidite beds in the Silurian turbidite sequence, North Greenland, show soft sediment deformation struc­ tures suggesting that the structureless (in respect of traction structures) sandstones divisions of the turbidi­ tes were deposited by direct suspension sedimentation from high-density flows. The deposits may have re­ sulted from multiple successive depositional events within the same turbidity flow. Reworking and shear­ ing of the newly formed loosely packed high-density suspension deposits caused by the still moving flow above create secondary soft sediment deformation structures which may be used as current indicators if other structures are absent (e.g. flute casts). P.-H. Larsen, Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelser, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Den­ mark. May 6th, I985. General aspects of turbidite sedimentation fine sand, silt and clay in a turbulent suspension. These residual currents may complete bypass The organisation of deposits from low-density areas of high-density turbidity current deposi­ turbidity currents, the classical Bouma model, tion, but may have significant local effects. They has been extensively discussed and reviewed by may shear, liquify and homogenise the loosely Bouma (1962), Walker (1965), Sanders (1965), packed high-density suspension deposits (Mid­ Middleton (1967, 1969, 1970), Walton (1967), dleton 1967; Lowe 1982). Unsteady, residual low Allen (1970) and Middleton & Hampton (1973, density currents can deposit sediment above that 1976) among others.
    [Show full text]
  • 19. Characteristics and Distribution of Neogene Turbidites at Site 657 (Leg 108, Cap Blanc Continental Rise
    Ruddiman, W., Sarnthein M., et al., 1989 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 108 19. CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF NEOGENE TURBIDITES AT SITE 657 (LEG 108, CAP BLANC CONTINENTAL RISE, NORTHWEST AFRICA): VARIATIONS IN TURBIDITE SOURCE AND CONTINENTAL CLIMATE1 Jean Claude Faugeres,2 Philippe Legigan,2 Noelle Maillet,2 Michael Sarnthein,3 and Ruediger Stein4 ABSTRACT Numerous and variable silty-sandy siliciclastic turbidites were observed in Neogene pelagic sediments (late Miocene to Holocene) at Site 657: (1) thick-bedded, coarse-grained and thin-bedded, fine-grained turbidites; and (2) turbidites composed of eolian dune sand and shallow-water bioclasts or of fluvial-sand or mixed sandy component assemblages. The stratigraphic distribution of these turbidites indicates five periods during which climatic conditions and material sources change. Turbidite occurrence prior to 6.2 Ma (late Miocene) is sparse; the deposits contain coarse and fine-grained turbidites with quartz grains of eolian or mixed origin suggesting the existence of arid conditions at about 8.5 and 6.5 Ma. A coarse-grained turbidite of fluvial origin, recording a humid climate, occurs at about 6.2 Ma. During the early Pliocene, turbidites are frequent (15/Ma); they contain only fine-grained sequences comprising material of mixed origin, which indicates a more humid climate perhaps. The late Pliocene starts with rare coarse-grained turbidites of wind-transported sand while the uppermost Pliocene deposits show a higher frequency of fine-grained sequences (10/0.7 Ma) composed mainly of fluvial material. During the early Pleistocene, similar high turbidite frequency was observed (20/1.3 Ma) but with a total lack of eolian supply.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT: Ten Turbidite Myths; #90007 (2002)
    AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90007©2002 AAPG Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, March 1-13, 2002 AAPG Annual Meeting March 10-13, 2002 Houston, Texas Ten Turbidite Myths Shanmugam, Ganapathy, Department of Geology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Introduction The turbidite paradigm, which is based on the tenet that a vast majority of deep-water sediment is composed of turbidites (i.e., deposits of turbidity currents), has promoted many turbidite myths during the past 50 years. John E. Sanders (1926-1999), a pioneering process sedimentologist, first uncovered some of these turbidite myths. This paper provides a reality check by undoing ten of these turbidite myths. Myth No. 1: Turbidity currents are non-turbulent flows with multiple sediment- support mechanisms The principal myth revolves around disagreements concerning the hydrodynamic properties of turbidity currents. The generally accepted definition is that turbidity currents are a type of sediment-gravity flow with Newtonian rheology (Dott, 1963) and turbulent state (Sanders, 1965) in which the principal sediment-support mechanism is the upward component of fluid turbulence (Middleton and Hampton, 1973). However, following the approach of Kuenen (see comment in Sanders, 1965, p. 217-218), Kneller and Buckee (2000, p. 63) claim that turbidity currents can be non turbulent (i.e., laminar) in state. This is confusing because turbidity currents cannot exist without turbulence (Middleton, 1993). According to Middleton and Hampton (1973), turbidity currents are flows in which sediment is supported by fluid turbulence. However, Kneller and Buckee (2000, p. 63) misused the term “turbidity currents” for “transitional flows” with multiple sediment- support mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Data File 86-861, TURBIDITE DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS of the UPPER CRETACEOUS to TERTIARY CANNING FORMATION, ARCTIC NATIO
    Public-data File 86-861, TURBIDITE DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS TO TERTIARY CANNING FORMATION, ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE (ANWR), ALASKA BY Mark A. Vandergon and Keith Crowder Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys December. 1986 This report has not been read by the director, has not received official DGGS publication status, and should not be quoted as such. 794 University Avenue, Basement Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 ABSTRACT The Upper Cretaceous to Lower Tertiary Canning Formation, in ANWR, contains significant turbidite successions which are important in reconstructing the depositional and tectonic history of this region. The turbidite facies crop out around the Sadlerochit Mountains, and are characterized by sandstone- and shale-dominant sequences which we interpret as submarine fan channel, channel levee complex, and interchannel deposits (mid-fan facies association). This sequence is locally overlain by shallow marine deposits of the Sagavanirktok Formation, which we interpret as lower delta plain sediment. Two contrasting types of channelized sandstone bodies are developed in the Canning Formation. The first type of channel-fill is composed of massive, fine- to medium-grained, lens shaped sandstone bodies which overlie a conspicuous erosional scour. These sediments were deposited during the same event which produced the erosional scour. The second type of channel-fill consists of fining-upward, thick- to thin-bedded sandstone. The sandstone beds thin and pinchout at the edges of the channel scour. These sandstone successions were deposited during later depositional episodes unrelated to the event which produced the erosional scour. Associated with the channels are sand-rich turbidite deposits. The sandstone beds are often laterally discontinuous, and contain soft sediment folds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bouma Sequence and the Turbidite Mind Set
    EARTWSCIENCE ELSEVIER Earth-Science Reviews 42 (1997) 201-229 The Bouma Sequence and the turbidite mind set G. Shanmugam * Mobil Technology Company, P. 0. Box 650232, Dallas, 7X 75265-0232, USA Received 12 September 1996; accepted 28 April 1997 Abstract Conventionally, the Bouma Sequence [Bouma, A.H., 1962. Sedimentology of some Flysch Deposits: A Graphic Approach to Facies Interpretation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 168 pp.], composed of T,, T,, T,, Td, and T, divisions, is interpreted to be the product of a turbidity current. However, recent core and outcrop studies show that the complete and partial Bouma sequences can also be interpreted to be deposits formed by processes other than turbidity currents, such as sandy debris flows and bottom-current reworking. Many published examples of turbidites, most of them hydrocarbon-bearing sands, in the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, offshore Nigeria, offshore Gabon, Gulf of Mexico, and the Ouachita Mountains, are being reinterpreted by the present author as dominantly deposits of sandy debris flows and bottom-current reworking with only a minor percentage of true turbidites (i.e., deposits of turbidity currents with fluidal or Newtonian rheology in which sediment is suspended by fluid turbulence). This reinterpretation is based on detailed description of 21,000 ft (6402 m) of conventional cores and 1200 ft (365 m> of outcrop sections. The predominance of interpreted turbidites in these areas by other workers can be attributed to the following: (1) loose applications of turbidity-current concepts without
    [Show full text]
  • 18. Turbidite Facies, Associations, and Sequences in the Southeastern Angola Basin1
    18. TURBIDITE FACIES, ASSOCIATIONS, AND SEQUENCES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN ANGOLA BASIN1 Dorrik A. V. Stow, Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3JW, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Turbidite sedimentation occurred throughout the Cretaceous to Recent history of the Angola Basin but was particu- larly important in three discrete intervals of fan development. Three turbidite classes are identified: classical sandy tur- bidites (both volcanogenic and calcarenite types); silt and mud turbidites (including five types based on Stow turbidite divisions); and biogenic turbidites (both pelagic and calcilutite types). These various turbidites are best described and in- terpreted in terms of two related turbidite models (Bouma, 1962; Stow, 1977). Complete and partial sequences of each model can be interpreted in terms of depositional process and subenvironment. The composition of the sediment (sand, mud, biogenic, terrigenous, etc.) is found to play an important part in the nature of turbidites deposited. Vertical facies sequences on the sandy volcanogenic "green fan" are interpreted as channel, lobe, and basin plain environments. For the muddy biogenic "brown fan," inner and outer fan and basin plain environments are more ap- propriate. Characteristic facies associations for each of these settings are described, based on facies types and propor- tions, turbidite frequency, bed thickness, grain size, and sedimentary structures. These associations are characteristic of open-ocean deep-water fans and basin plains and are significantly different from those described from land-based studies of ancient fans in small, more shallow-water, tectonically active basins. INTRODUCTION CLASSICAL SANDY TURBIDITES The sediment pile cored at Deep Sea Drilling Project These turbidites occur in both the green and white (DSDP) Site 530 in the S.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing Between Deep-Water Sediment Facies: Turbidites, Contourites and Hemipelagites
    geosciences Article Distinguishing between Deep-Water Sediment Facies: Turbidites, Contourites and Hemipelagites Dorrik Stow and Zeinab Smillie * Institute of Geo-Energy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Scotland, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-131-451-3845 Received: 28 August 2019; Accepted: 23 January 2020; Published: 13 February 2020 Abstract: The distinction between turbidites, contourites and hemipelagites in modern and ancient deep-water systems has long been a matter of controversy. This is partly because the processes themselves show a degree of overlap as part of a continuum, so that the deposit characteristics also overlap. In addition, the three facies types commonly occur within interbedded sequences of continental margin deposits. The nature of these end-member processes and their physical parameters are becoming much better known and are summarised here briefly. Good progress has also been made over the past decade in recognising differences between end-member facies in terms of their sedimentary structures, facies sequences, ichnofacies, sediment textures, composition and microfabric. These characteristics are summarised here in terms of standard facies models and the variations from these models that are typically encountered in natural systems. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that clear distinction is not always possible on the basis of sedimentary characteristics alone, and that uncertainties should be highlighted in any interpretation. A three-scale approach to distinction for all deep-water facies types should be attempted wherever possible, including large-scale (oceanographic and tectonic setting), regional-scale (architecture and association) and small-scale (sediment facies) observations. Keywords: turbidites; contourites; hemipelagites; deep-water systems; facies; continental margin deposits; ichnofacies; sediment textures; microfabric 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Reservoir Quality of the Dean Sandstone Within Borden and Dawson Counties
    An Analysis of the Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Reservoir Quality of the Dean Sandstone within Borden and Dawson Counties, Midland Basin, West Texas by Brittany M. Abbuhl A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date: _____________ Signed: __________________________________ Brittany M. Abbuhl Signed: __________________________________ Dr. Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date: _____________ Signed: __________________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Located in West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico, the Greater Permian Basin has recently become the largest petroleum-producing basin in the United States and the second largest in the world, having produced over 30 billion barrels of oil as of January 2018 (Mercador, 2018). Although the Permian Basin has been conventionally drilled since the 1920s, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have recently generated a resurgence in activity in the once thought uneconomical, low permeability, basinal plays of the Lower Permian (Wolfcampian and Leonardian Series) stratigraphy. The current most popular unconventional targets within the Midland Basin, a sub-basin of the broader Permian Basin region, are the fine-grained, low permeability siliciclastic intervals of the Leonardian Series (Spraberry and Dean formations) and the organic-rich calcareous mudstones of the Wolfcampian interval. The Permian Basin has been subject to a great number of geologic studies to establish age, stratigraphy, regional setting, and depositional facies in support of a long history of conventional oil field reservoir development in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Characterization of the Bone Spring and Wolfcamp
    RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE BONE SPRING AND WOLFCAMP FORMATIONS, DELAWARE BASIN, WARD COUNTY, WEST TEXAS by April Bievenour A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: __________________________ April N. Bievenour Signed: __________________________ Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: __________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations of the Delaware Basin consist of mixed sediment gravity flow and suspension sedimentation deposits. These deposits exhibit high levels of heterogeneity both at and below core and log scales. Conventional characterization efforts are too coarse to capture small-scale changes in lithology, rock properties, and reservoir quality observed in these unconventional deposits. A key goal of this work is to develop a framework to delineate complex heterogeneities at core and log scales. Due to the heterolithic nature of these strata, an integrated, multiscale approach to unconventional reservoir characterization is required to understand factors controlling reservoir quality. This study utilizes well logs and core data from two key wells, including high-resolution image data from thin sections and SEM, to (1) identify facies across multiple scales and (2) provide an in-depth characterization of reservoir properties in the Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations along the eastern margin of the Delaware Basin. An integrated approach utilizing core (721 ft.), thin sections (70 samples), XRD analysis (64 samples), and high-resolution images (882 images) identified a total of nine facies.
    [Show full text]