DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 77 Friday, No. 57 March 23, 2012 Part II Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless; Notice VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Mar 22, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NTOICES2 17126 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND property is described as for ‘‘off-site use Construction Management, MA–50, URBAN DEVELOPMENT only’’ recipients of the property will be 1000 Independence Ave. SW., required to relocate the building to their Washington, DC 20585: (202) 586–5422; [Docket No. FR–5601–N–12] own site at their own expense. NAVY: Mr. Steve Matteo, Department of Federal Property Suitable as Facilities Homeless assistance providers the Navy, Asset Management Division, To Assist the Homeless interested in any such property should Naval Facilities Engineering Command, send a written expression of interest to Washington Navy Yard, 1330 Patterson AGENCY: Office of the Assistant HHS, addressed to Theresa Ritta, Ave. SW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC Secretary for Community Planning and Division of Property Management, 20374; (202) 685–9426 (These are not Development, HUD. Program Support Center, HHS, room toll-free numbers). ACTION: Notice. 5B–17, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Dated: March 15, 2012. MD 20857; (301) 443–2265. (This is not Mark R. Johnston, SUMMARY: This Notice identifies a toll-free number.) HHS will mail to the unutilized, underutilized, excess, and interested provider an application Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs. surplus Federal property reviewed by packet, which will include instructions TITLE V, FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY HUD for suitability for use to assist the for completing the application. In order PROGRAM FEDERAL REGISTER REPORT homeless. to maximize the opportunity to utilize a FOR 03/23/2012 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: suitable property, providers should Suitable/Available Properties Juanita Perry, Department of Housing submit their written expressions of and Urban Development, 451 Seventh interest as soon as possible. For Building Street SW., Room 7266, Washington, DC complete details concerning the California processing of applications, the reader is 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234; TTY Facility 1 number for the hearing- and speech- encouraged to refer to the interim rule OTHB Radar Site impaired (202) 708–2565 (these governing this program, 24 CFR part Tulelake CA 91634 telephone numbers are not toll-free), or 581. Landholding Agency: Air Force call the toll-free Title V information line For properties listed as suitable/to be Property Number: 18200830012 at 800–927–7588. excess, that property may, if Status: Unutilized subsequently accepted as excess by Comments: 7920 sq. ft., most recent use— SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In GSA, be made available for use by the communications accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and homeless in accordance with applicable Facility 2 section 501 of the Stewart B. McKinney law, subject to screening for other OTHB Radar Site Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. Federal use. At the appropriate time, Tulelake CA 91634 11411), as amended, HUD is publishing HUD will publish the property in a Landholding Agency: Air Force this Notice to identify Federal buildings Property Number: 18200830014 Notice showing it as either suitable/ Status: Unutilized and other real property that HUD has available or suitable/unavailable. reviewed for suitability for use to assist Comments: 900 sq. ft., most recent use—veh For properties listed as suitable/ maint shop the homeless. The properties were unavailable, the landholding agency has reviewed using information provided to Facilities 3, 4 decided that the property cannot be OTHB Radar Site HUD by Federal landholding agencies declared excess or made available for Tulelake CA 91634 regarding unutilized and underutilized use to assist the homeless, and the Landholding Agency: Air Force buildings and real property controlled property will not be available. Property Number: 18200830015 by such agencies or by GSA regarding Properties listed as unsuitable will Status: Unutilized its inventory of excess or surplus not be made available for any other Comments: 4160 sq. ft. each, most recent Federal property. This Notice is also purpose for 20 days from the date of this use—communications published in order to comply with the Notice. Homeless assistance providers Facility 1 December 12, 1988 Court Order in interested in a review by HUD of the OTHB Radar Site National Coalition for the Homeless v. determination of unsuitability should Christmas Valley CA 97641 Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503– call the toll free information line at 1– Landholding Agency: Air Force OG (D.D.C.). Property Number: 18200830016 800–927–7588 for detailed instructions Status: Unutilized Properties reviewed are listed in this or write a letter to Mark Johnston at the Comments: 16566 sq. ft., most recent use— Notice according to the following address listed at the beginning of this communications categories: Suitable/available, suitable/ Notice. Included in the request for Facility 2 unavailable, suitable/to be excess, and review should be the property address OTHB Radar Site unsuitable. The properties listed in the (including zip code), the date of Christmas Valley CA 97641 three suitable categories have been publication in the Federal Register, the Landholding Agency: Air Force reviewed by the landholding agencies, landholding agency, and the property Property Number: 18200830017 and each agency has transmitted to number. Status: Unutilized HUD: (1) Its intention to make the For more information regarding Comments: 900 sq. ft., most recent use—veh property available for use to assist the particular properties identified in this maint shop homeless, (2) its intention to declare the Notice (i.e., acreage, floor plan, existing Facility 4 property excess to the agency’s needs, or sanitary facilities, exact street address), OTHB Radar Site (3) a statement of the reasons that the providers should contact the Christmas Valley CA 97641 Landholding Agency: Air Force property cannot be declared excess or appropriate landholding agencies at the Property Number: 18200830018 made available for use as facilities to following addresses: AIR FORCE: Mr. Status: Unutilized assist the homeless. Robert Moore, Air Force Real Property Comments: 14,190 sq. ft., most recent use— Properties listed as suitable/available Agency, 143 Billy Mitchell Blvd., San communications will be available exclusively for Antonio, TX 78226, (210) 925–3047; Facility 6 homeless use for a period of 60 days ENERGY: Mr. Mark Price, Department of OTHB Radar Site from the date of this Notice. Where Energy, Office of Engineering & Christmas Valley CA 97641 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Mar 22, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NTOICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices 17127 Landholding Agency: Air Force Comments: 25LF-wide, 14LF-height, 30LF- Property Number: 18201210103 Property Number: 18200830019 length; current use: exchange store; good to Status: Unutilized Status: Unutilized fair condition Comments: Off site removal only; 225 sq. ft.; Comments: 14,190 sq. ft., most recent use— recent use: equipment storage New Mexico transmitter bldg. Bldg. 906 Bldg. 1802 Bldg. 5435 Joint Base Charleston-Weapons 200 West Terminal Ave. Davis Ave. Charleston SC 29445 Cannon AFB Barksdale CA 71101 Landholding Agency: Air Force Cannon NM 88103 Landholding Agency: Air Force Property Number: 18201210105 Landholding Agency: Air Force Status: Unutilized Property Number: 18201140041 Property Number: 18201210099 Status: Underutilized Directions: Enter base gate on Red Bank Rd Status: Unutilized and continue, passing Old Turn Rd. Turn Comments: off-site removal only; 3,024 sq. Comments: Off site removal only; 3,780 sq. ft.; current use: bank; need repairs right at Bldg 2 and follow rd on right side ft.; recent use: office; restricted access of Bldg 2. Bldg 906 is on right side. Colorado Bldg 1803 Comments: Off site removal only; 400 sq. ft.; Bldg. 1425 and 143 403 Olympic Blvd. recent use: storage of spill kit items Cannon NM 88103 Peterson AFB Texas Colorado Springs CO 80914 Landholding Agency: Air Force Band Center Landholding Agency: Air Force Property Number: 18201210100 Status: Unutilized Lackland Property Number: 18201140024 San Antonio TX Status: Unutilized Comments: Off site removal only; 3,780 sq. ft.; recent use: office bldg.; restricted access Landholding Agency: Air Force Comments: off-site removal only; 1425— Property Number: 18201140038 2 Bldgs. 64,254 sq. ft.; 143—100 sq. ft.; current use: Status: Unutilized Cannon AFB storage to base exchange; need repairs; Comments: Off-site removal only; 15,669 sq. Cannon NM 88103 possible asbestos ft.; current use: band center; need repairs Landholding Agency: Air Force Florida Property Number: 18201210111 Land Fac. 90329 Status: Underutilized California Cape Canaveral AFS Directions: 2321 and 2322 Cape Canaveral FL 32925 Comments: Off-site removal only; sq. ft. Parcels L1 & L2 Landholding Agency: Air Force varies; current use: varies; poor George AFB Property Number: 18201210085 conditions—need repairs Victorville CA 92394 Landholding Agency: Air Force Status: Excess New York Comments: 4,203 sq. ft.; current use: office; Property Number: 18200820034 very poor conditions—needs
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2

    Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2

    Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2 General Principles - Federal civilian employers are covered by OSHA throughout the four-state region. State, county, municipal and other non-federal public employers (except tribal government employers) are covered by state programs in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. There is no state program in Idaho, and OSHA’s coverage of public employers in Idaho is limited to the federal sector. OSHA regulates most private employers in Idaho with exceptions noted below. Industry / Location State Coverage OSHA Coverage Air Carriers1 Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Air Washington, Oregon and Alaska: carrier operations on the ground only. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Idaho: Air carrier operations on the ground. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Commercial Diving Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Washington, Oregon, and Alaska: Employers with diving operations staged Employers with diving operations from shore, piers, docks or other fixed staged from boats or other vessels afloat locations. on navigable waters 2. Idaho: All diving operations for covered employers. 1 The term “air carrier refers to private employers engaged in air transportation of passengers and/or cargo. The term “aircraft cabin crew member” refers to employees working in the cabin during flight such as flight attendants or medical staff; however, the term does not include pilots. 2 In the state of Washington, for vessels afloat, such as boats, ships and barges moored at a pier or dock, DOSH’s jurisdiction ends at the edge of the dock or pier and OSHA’s jurisdiction begins at the foot of the gangway or other means of access to the vessel; this principle applies to all situations involving moored vessels, including construction, longshoring, and ship repair.
  • 2021-2 Bio Book

    2021-2 Bio Book

    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Keystone Class 2021-2 7-18 June 2021 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Lieutenant General Mike Plehn is the 17th President of the National Defense University. As President of NDU, he oversees its five component colleges that offer graduate-level degrees and certifications in joint professional military education to over 2,000 U.S. military officers, civilian government officials, international military officers and industry partners annually. Raised in an Army family, he graduated from Miami Southridge Senior High School in 1983 and attended the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy with Military Distinction and a degree in Astronautical Engineering in 1988. He is a Distinguished Graduate of Squadron Officer School as well as the College of Naval Command and Staff, where he received a Master’s Degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies. He also holds a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Airpower Studies, as well as a Master of Aerospace Science degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Lt Gen Plehn has extensive experience in joint, interagency, and special operations, including: Middle East Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, and four tours at the Combatant Command level to include U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, and twice at U.S. Southern Command, where he was most recently the Military Deputy Commander. He also served on the Air Staff in Strategy and Policy and as the speechwriter to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
  • Air Force Golf AIR FORCE GOLF

    Air Force Golf AIR FORCE GOLF

    AAIRIR FFORCEORCE GGOLFOLF 22016016 MMEDIAwww.GOAIRFORCEFALCONS.COMEDIA GGUIDEUIDE PAGE TITLE HERE Air Force Golf AIR FORCE GOLF ACADEMY QUICK FACTS TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION Academy Information, Table of Contents .........................................................1 Location ............................................. USAF Academy, Colo. Head Coach George Koury .................................................................................2 Founded ........................................................................1954 2016 Men's Golf Roster .....................................................................................3 Nickname ..................................................................Falcons Meet The Falcons .........................................................................................4-22 Colors ............................................................Blue and Silver Senior Michael Fan ..................................................................................4-5 Enrollment ...................................................................4,000 Junior Troy Berglund ...............................................................................6-7 Affiliation .....................................................NCAA Division I Junior Brenden Bone ...............................................................................8-9 Conference .................................................. Mountain West Junior Sunwoo Choi .............................................................................10-11
  • Discount Ticket Price List

    Discount Ticket Price List

    RegularDisney Disney World Ticket - Orlando Options Magic Kingdom, Epcot, Hollywood Studios & Animal Kingdom Joint Base Charleston Park Hopper* Passes Our Price Gate Price/tax Discount *1-Day Hopper Adult $200.00 $213.00 *1-Day Hopper Child 3-9 $198.00 $210.87 *2-Day Hopper Adult $316.00 $336.54 Ticket *2-Day Hopper Child 3-9 $306.00 $325.89 *4-Day Hopper Adult $485.00 $516.53 Child 3-9 $465.00 $495.25 *5-Day Hopper Adult $510.00 $543.15 Price List Child 3-9 $490.00 $521.85 *Hopper Passes allow guests to visit all four parks in the same day. These may be upgraded to Magic Fun Pass and No Expiration Option at Disney World. Base tickets* - One park per day Our Price Gate Price/tax 3-Day Adult $304.00 $323.76 Child 3-9 $295.00 $314.18 *Base Tickets are one park per day and expire two weeks after the rst date of use. Hopper Pass, Magic Fun Pass and No Expiration options may be added on, for the following prices at Disney World. Universal Orlando Resort Universal Studios & Island of Adventure - Orlando Our Price Gate Price/tax Two Day Base Adult- 2 Park $213.00 $283.29 Child (3-9) - 2 Park $203.00 $272.64 Three Day Base Adult - 3 Park $273.00 $353.69 Child (3-9) - 3 Park $263.00 $343.14 Four Day Base Adult - 3 Park $297.00 $363.38 Child (3-9) - 3 Park $287.00 $353.15 Park-to-Park (Two parks - two days) Adult - 2 Days $273.00 $325.99 Child (3-9) - 2 Days $263.00 $315.00 Park-to-Park (Two parks - three days) Adult - 3 Day $293.00 $340.91 Child (3-9) - 3 Day $283.00 $331.11 Park-to-Park (Two parks - four days) Tickets available at..
  • January 2020 Volume 62, Number 1 Katherine Edwards, Editor

    January 2020 Volume 62, Number 1 Katherine Edwards, Editor

    The Wildlife Society SOUTHEASTERN SECTION JANUARY 2020 VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 KATHERINE EDWARDS, EDITOR PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS together and tackling some major conservation challenges during this decade. I also believe 2020, we made it! We began the 2010s with the TWS can serve as the hub of our group effort, big bang of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill fol- facilitating communication among members, lowed by the rise and fall of annual mean tem- and encouraging partnerships. peratures, the first total solar eclipse in North America since President Woodrow Wilson, the As part of this belief, I would like to remind you end of NASA’s Space Shuttle era, and the rise of that we, the Executive Board of the Southeast- the iPhone with the phase out of the Blackberry. ern Section of The Wildlife Society are here to Meanwhile, we continued to observe rapid urban serve you, our membership. Reach out, contact expansion, wildlife habitat loss and degradation, us, contact your fellow members, however you exotic species explosions, species loss and the feel it’s best to get your question addressed or continued pattern of information overload de- to start your research and management team to spite substantial knowledge gaps. So, what can smite a current conservation challenge. Second, we do about it! let’s try to improve our communication as a Sec- tion. We can converse face-to-face, email, call, I’m only an elected member of a subunit of The Tweet, Instagram, Snapchat, DM, etc. However, Wildlife Society! So, for the love of wild places we often fail to communicate.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 193/Friday, October 4, 2013/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 193/Friday, October 4, 2013/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2013 / Notices 61851 11. Type of Information Collection this collection contact Anitra Johnson at would constitute a clearly unwarranted Request: Reinstatement without change 410–786–0609). invasion of personal privacy. of a previously approved collection; 13. Type of Information Collection Name of Committee: National Human Title of Information Collection: Request: Extension of a currently Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Medicare Geographic Classification approved collection; Title of Panel Extramural Gene Function Research Review Board (MGCRB) Procedures and Information Collection: State Children’s Initiative (R21) UDP. Supporting Regulations; Use: The Health Insurance Program and Date: November 27, 2013. information submitted by the hospitals Supporting Regulations; Use: States Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. is used to determine the validity of the must submit title XXI plans and Agenda: To review and evaluate grant hospitals’ requests and the discretion amendments for approval by the applications. Secretary. We use the plan and its Place: National Human Genome Research used by the Medicare Geographic Institute, 4076 Conference Room, 5635 Classification Review Board (MGCRB) subsequent amendments to determine if Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, in reviewing and making decisions the state has met the requirements of (Telephone Conference Call). regarding hospitals’ requests for title XXI. Information provided in the Contact Person: Keith McKenney, Ph.D., geographic reclassification. Form state plan, state plan amendments, and Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Number: CMS–R–138 (OCN: 0938– from the other information we are Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 0573); Frequency: Yearly; Affected collecting will be used by advocacy 20814, 301–594–4280, mckenneyk@ Public: Business or other for-profits and groups, beneficiaries, applicants, other mail.nih.gov.
  • Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station

    Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station

    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2001 Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station Mark J. Shoviak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Shoviak, Mark J., "Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station" (2001). Theses and Dissertations. 4696. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4696 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Mark J. Shoviak, Captain, USAF AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U. S. Government. AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Systems and Engineering Management Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Environmental Management Mark J.
  • Joint Base Charleston Weapons Charleston, South Carolina Joint

    Joint Base Charleston Weapons Charleston, South Carolina Joint

    Joint Base Charleston Weapons Charleston, South Carolina Joint Base Charleston-Weapons is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties in the coastal area of South Carolina. The installation is situated in Goose Creek, South Carolina and covers an area of approximately 16,950 acres of contiguous property. The primary mission of JB CHS-Weapons is to enable and sustain warfighter readiness from the shore. On October 1, 2010, the Air Force officially assumed responsibility for the new Joint Base Charleston, which encompasses the former Charleston Air Force Base and Naval Weapons Station Charleston. The joint base has two sections: Joint Base Charleston Air, which encompasses the former Air Force Base and Joint Base Charleston Weapons, which encompasses the former Navy weapons station. As part of this permit mod the following has changed: Two (2) Additional AOCs Added SWMU 85 – Northside Construction/Demolition Debris AOC Q – Eastside Ordnance Area 1 Remedies have been selected for eight (8) SWMUs and AOCs Site Remedy SWMU 28 – South Annex Building 3818 No Further Action (NFA) SMWU 30 – South Annex Hardstand Area No Further Action (NFA SWMU 33 – Southside Building 930 Paint Shop No Further Action (NFA) SWMU 48 – Southside Building 91-Ammunition No Further Action (NFA) Renovation Shop SWMU 49 – Weapons Station/Berkeley POTW No Further Action (NFA) Sewer Outfall SWMU 65 – South Annex Building 3412, Old Care No Further Action (NFA) & Preservation Shop Septic Tank AOC J – South Annex, Old Building 3637, Boxcar No Further Action (NFA) Repair and Paint Facility AOC P – Northside Small Squad Training Area No Further Investigation w/ Notation in Base Master Plan 1 SWMU 28 – Old South Annex Building 3818 Contaminants: None Media: None Proposed Remedy: No Further Action (NFA) Proposed Corrective Action NFA is proposed for SWMU 28.
  • Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018

    Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018

    Request for Qualifications Arizona Department of Solicitation No. Administration ADSPO18-00007887 State Procurement Office Description: 100 N 15th Ave., Suite 201 2018 Professional Services List Phoenix, AZ 85007 Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 ATTACHMENT 1 ........ OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM ...................................... 2 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 3 1.0 ..... FIVE (5) EXAMPLE PROJECTS ...................................................................... 3 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 5 2.0 ..... EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ......................................................................... 5 3.0 ..... FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE ........................................................... 7 4.0 ..... FIRMS SERVICES ........................................................................................... 7 5.0 ..... EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: ........................................................................ 8 ATTACHMENT 2-B .... ORGANIZATION PROFILE .................................................. 10 ATTACHMENT 3-A .... METHOD PROPOSAL .......................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT 3-B .... KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSAL ........................................... 13 ATTACHMENT 3-C ... PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ..................................... 29 ATTACHMENT 3-D ... PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ........................................... 31 ATTACHMENT 3-E .... ISRAEL
  • Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2013

    Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2013

    INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 611th Air Support Group Alaska Installations U.S. AIR FORCE, 611th AIR SUPPORT GROUP, ALASKA 611th CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON, ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 611th Air Support Group, Alaska Installations This revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) meets requirements of the Sikes Act (16 USC 670a et seq.) as amended and as approved in previous plans in 2007, 2008, and 2009 by the 611th Air Support Group Commander, the Alaska Regional Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game commissioner. Use and mission of the installations have not significantly changed since approval of the previous plans. The Short and Long Range Radar Sites and Eareckson Air Station INRMPs were approved for use in 2007; the King Salmon Airport INRMP was approved for use in 2008; and the Inactive Sites INRMP was approved for use in 2009. They will remain in use until replaced by the final version of this plan. The primary change in this revised INRMP is that of format to follow guidance provided in Air Force Instruction 32-7064. This INRMP also groups installations from the four previous plans into one document. Data specific to each installation and management goals, objectives, and projects have also been updated and included in this revision. Sikes Act Cooperating Agencies* ROBYN M. BURK, Colonel, USAF Commander 611th Air Support Group GEOFFREY HASKETT Regional Director, Region 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service *Above signatures are digital copies of originals, which are on file at the 611th Air Support Group.
  • Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: a Planning and Design Guide

    Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: a Planning and Design Guide

    LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA: A PLANNING AND DESIGN GUidE Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide This publication was made possible through support from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Sci- ence Collaborative, a partnership of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of New Hampshire. The Science Collaborative advances the use of science in coastal decision making by engag- ing intended users of the science in the research process—from problem definition to practical application of results. Cover Photo credits: Kathryn Ellis, Kathryn Ellis, Seamon Whiteside + Associates, Erik Smith. Recommended Citation for this Guidebook: Ellis, K., C. Berg, D. Caraco, S. Drescher, G. Hoffmann, B. Keppler, M. LaRocco, and A.Turner. 2014. Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide. ACE Basin and North Inlet – Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserves, 462 pp. Download a digital copy of this document and the spreadsheet tools at http://www.northinlet.sc.edu/LID Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Team Sadie Drescher, Center for Watershed Protection Kathryn Ellis, EIT, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Blaik Keppler, SC Department of Natural Resources & ACE Basin National Estuarine Research Reserve April Turner, South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium Michelle LaRocco, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Wendy Allen, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Advisory Committee The Advisory Committee provided guidance and feedback on the content of this document, devel- oped and participated in workshops, and engaged stakeholders.
  • Fy18 Ballistic Missile Defense Systems

    Fy18 Ballistic Missile Defense Systems

    Director, Operational Test and Evaluation FY 2018 Annual Report December 2018 This report satisfies the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 139. The report summarizes the operational test and evaluation activities (including live fire testing activities) of the Department of Defense during the preceding fiscal year. Robert F. Behler Director FY18 INTRODUCTION FY 2018 Annual Report The freedom and security of our nation depends on the lethality and readiness of our military. Our warfi ghters must be prepared for combat, equipped with secure, credible weapon systems, and trained to employ those systems eff ectively and decisively. As the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E), I ensure that our weapon systems are systematically tested across a range of operational conditions that warfi ghters are likely to encounter in combat. Establishing combat credibility through realistic testing gives warfi ghters the confi dence their weapons and equipment will work when they need them. I have been in this position for just over one year and, during this time, have informed 92 acquisition and 25 fi elding decisions for the Department. When I was appointed to this position, I committed to increasing collaboration between DOT&E and other agencies within the defense community. Looking back, I have been most impressed with the “spirit of cooperation” between OSD and the military Services. With an attitude of teamwork, we are working towards the ability to fi eld combat credible systems at the speed of relevance. During the past year, my offi ce collaborated with other OSD offi ces and the test and evaluation (T&E) community to increase combined approaches to testing programs.