Founding Fathers of the United States from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Founding Fathers of the United States from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Founding Fathers of the United States From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Founding Fathers of the United States are those individuals of the Thirteen Colonies in North America who led the American Revolution against the authority of the British Crown in word and deed and contributed to the establishment of the United States of America.[2] Historian Richard B. Morris in 1973 identified the following seven figures as the key Founding Fathers: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Trumbull's Declaration of Independence, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas a painting by John Trumbull depicting Jefferson, James Madison, and George the Committee of Five presenting their Washington.[3][4] Adams, Jefferson, and Franklin draft to the Congress on June 28, 1776.[1] were members of the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of Independence. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay were authors of The Federalist Papers, advocating ratification of the Constitution. Jay, Adams and Franklin negotiated the Treaty of Paris (1783) that would end the American Revolutionary War.[5] Washington was Commander­in­Chief of the Continental Army and was President of the Constitutional Convention. Washington, Jay and Franklin are considered the Founding Fathers of U.S. Intelligence by the CIA.[6] All held additional important roles in the early government of the United States, with Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison serving as President. Four of these seven ­ Washington, Jay, Hamilton and Madison ­ did not sign the Declaration of Independence.[7] Signature page of Treaty of The term Founding Fathers is sometimes used to refer to Paris (1783); the treaty was the Signers of the embossed version of the Declaration of negotiated by John Adams, [8] Independence in 1776. It is not to be confused with the Benjamin Franklin and John term Framers; the Framers are defined by the National Jay Archives as those 55 individuals who were appointed to be delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention and took part in drafting the proposed Constitution of the United States. Of the 55 Framers, only 39 were signers of the Constitution.[9][10] Two further groupings of Founding Founders include: 1) those who signed the Continental Association, a trade ban and one of the colonists' first collective volleys protesting British control and the Intolerable Acts in 1774 [11] or 2) those who signed the Articles of Confederation, the first U.S. constitutional document.[12] The phrase "Founding Fathers" is a twentieth­century appellation, first coined by Warren G. Harding in 1916.[13] In the 19th century, they were referred to as simply, the "Fathers". Some historians have begun to eschew the limiting Great Man theory associated with the term "Founding Fathers" and apply it to a broader group of people, that includes not only Morris' "Seven" or the Signers or the Framers but also all those, no matter their race or gender, who, whether as politicians, jurists, statesmen, soldiers, diplomats, or ordinary citizens, took part in winning U.S. independence and creating the United States of America.[14][15] Contents 1 Background 2 Interesting facts and commonalities 2.1 Education 2.1.1 Colleges attended 2.1.2 Advanced degrees and apprenticeships 2.1.2.1 Doctors of medicine 2.1.2.2 Theology 2.1.2.3 Legal apprenticeships 2.1.3 Self­taught or little formal education 2.2 Demographics 2.3 Political experience 2.4 Occupations and finances 2.5 Religion 2.6 Ownership of slaves and position on slavery 2.7 Attendance at conventions 2.8 Spouses and children 2.9 Charters of freedom and historical documents of the United States 2.10 Post­constitution life 2.11 Youth and longevity 2.12 Founders who were not signatories or delegates 3 Legacy 3.1 Institutions formed by Founders 3.2 Scholarship on the Founders 3.2.1 Living historians whose focus is the Founding Fathers 3.2.2 Noted collections of the Founding Fathers 3.3 In stage and film 3.4 Children's books 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Background The First Continental Congress met briefly in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1774 and consisted of fifty­six delegates from twelve of the Thirteen Colonies (excluding Georgia) that became the United States of America. On the list of attendees was George Washington, who would soon be drawn out of military retirement to command the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. Also in attendance was Patrick Henry, and John Adams, who were elected by their respective colonial The Albany Congress assemblies. Other notable delegates included Samuel Adams from of 1754 was a Massachusetts, John Dickinson from Pennsylvania and New conference attended by York's John Jay. This congress in addition to formulating appeals seven colonies, which to the British crown, established the Continental Association to presaged later efforts at administer boycott actions against Britain. cooperation. The Stamp Act Congress of When the Second Continental Congress came together on May 1765 included 10, 1775, it was, in effect, a reconvening of the First Congress. representatives from Many of the same 56 delegates who attended the first meeting nine colonies. participated in the second.[16] Notable new arrivals included Benjamin Franklin and Robert Morris of Pennsylvania, John Hancock of Massachusetts, and John Witherspoon of New Jersey. Hancock was elected Congress President two weeks into the session when Peyton Randolph was summoned back to Virginia to preside over the House of Burgesses. Thomas Jefferson replaced Randolph in the Virginia congressional delegation.[17] The second Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence. Witherspoon was the only active clergyman to sign the Declaration. He also signed the Articles of Confederation and attended the New Jersey (1787) convention that ratified the Federal Constitution.[18] The newly founded country of the United States had to create a new government to replace the British Parliament. The U.S. adopted the Articles of Confederation, a declaration that established a national government which was made up of a one­house legislature. Its ratification by all thirteen colonies gave the second Congress a new name: the Congress of the Confederation, which met from 1781 to 1789.[19] Later, the Constitutional Convention took place during the summer of 1787, in Philadelphia.[20] Although the Convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation, the intention from the outset of many – chiefly James Madison and Alexander Hamilton – was to create a new frame of government rather than attempting to fix the existing one. The delegates elected George Washington to preside over the Convention. The result of the Convention was the United States Constitution. Interesting facts and commonalities The Founding Fathers represented a cross­section of 18th­century U.S. leadership. Almost all of them were well­educated men of means who were leaders in their communities. Many were also prominent in national affairs. Virtually every one had taken part in the American Revolution; at least 29 had served in the Continental Army, most of them in positions of command. Scholars have examined the collective biography of them as well as the signers of the Declaration and the Scene at the Signing of the Constitution Constitution.[21] of the United States, by Howard Chandler Christy Education Many of the Founding Fathers attended or held degrees from the colonial colleges, the earliest of these being Harvard (1636), the College of William and Mary (1693), King William's School (1696) and Yale (1701). Some had previously been home schooled or obtained early instruction from private tutors or academies.[22] Others had studied abroad. Ironically, Benjamin Franklin who had little formal education himself would ultimately establish the University of Pennsylvania based on European models (1740); "Penn" would have the first medical school (1765) in the thirteen colonies where another Founder, Benjamin Rush would eventually teach. With a limited number of professional schools established in the U.S., Founders also sought advanced degrees from traditional institutions in England and Scotland such as the University of Edinburgh and University of St. Andrews. Colleges attended College of William and Mary: Thomas Jefferson [23] Harvard University: John Adams, John Hancock and William Williams George Washington King's College (today's Columbia University): John Jay, served as President of Alexander Hamilton, Gouverneur Morris, Robert R. the 1787 Constitutional [24] Livingston, and Egbert Benson. Convention. Princeton: James Madison, Gunning Bedford, Jr., Aaron Burr, Benjamin Rush and William Paterson University of Pennsylvania: Hugh Williamson Yale: Oliver Wolcott James Wilson attended University of St. Andrews and University of Edinburgh though he never received a degree. Advanced degrees and apprenticeships Doctors of medicine University of Edinburgh: Rush [25] Benjamin Franklin, an University of Utrecht, Netherlands: Williamson early advocate of colonial unity, was a Theology foundational figure in defining the U.S. ethos University of Edinburgh: Witherspoon (attended, no degree) and exemplified the University of St. Andrews : Witherspoon (honorary emerging nation's doctorate) ideals. Legal apprenticeships Several like John Jay, James Wilson, John Williams and George Wythe[26] were trained as lawyers through apprenticeships in the colonies while a few trained at the Inns of Court in London. Self­taught or little formal education Franklin, Washington, John Williams and Henry Wisner had little
Recommended publications
  • Of the Commemorative Ceremony-A Description
    .DOCUMENT RESUME . SO00947 9 : Commemoration,Ceremony in konor, of the Two Hundredth Anniversary of the First ContinentalCongress in the United States House' of Representatives,September Twenty-Fifth, Nineteen Hundred andSeventy-Four. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.-$., Washington, D.C. House. 'REPORT NO 93-413 PUB:DATE 75 i NOTE 151p. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington,.D.C. 20402 (stockno. -052-071-00432-7, $1.80) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$8.69 Plus Postage. -DESCRIPTORS American Culture; American Studies; Civics;*Colonial History (United States); ConstitutiOnal History; . Educational Resources; *FederalGovernment; Federal 'Programs; Government Publications; GovqrnmentRole; History Instruction; Political Influences;Political .Science; Politics; *Primary Sources;Roference Materials; Resource Materials;. RevolutionaryWar (United States); Social History; *supplcmentary Reading Materials; *United StatesHistelry IDENTIFIERS *Eicdntenniai; *Continental CongressOst) ABSTRACT This documen+ provides a report ofactivities undertaken at the first official bicentennialcelehrntion by the U.S. Congress in January 1974..The projectwas initiated .to provide commemoration of the First ContinentalCongress which met in Philadelphia in September 1774. The booldetpresents the proceedings of the commemorative ceremony-a descriptionof tiazo Old Guard Fife Drum Corps, and the Camerata Chorus Of Washington.In the major portion of the booklet, a documentaryhistory of the First Continental Congress is presented. Thethree sections
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Revolution LARRY R. GERLACH
    The Road to Revolution LARRY R. GERLACH :Be11i1 ~~~eit ~~~~ir"'I ;J:«~~il/¥icr~~~;,,:,~ ~ h ~~,,,v ".:'" '"t J~ 'ft,~* r~ '"d 1 ) ~' d~::~ c;~~ ".(iyt\;i, 'l'Y:;;; 7 01'. ,, t ~' t ~1 J~ " I l I NEW JERSEY'S REVOLUTIONARY EXPERIENCE Larry R. Gerlach, Editor I I I This series of publications is dedicated to the memory of Alfred E. Driscoll, governor of New Jersey from 1947 to 1954, in grateful tribute to his lifelong support of the study and teaching of the history of New Jersey and the United States. He was a member of the New Jersey Historical Commission from 1970 until his death on March 9, 1975. '!.I!~ I The Road to Revolution LARRY R. GERLACH New Jersey Historical Commission Ubtary of C-.-Cataloging In PubUcation Data Gerlach, I.any R The road to Revolution. (New Jersey's revolutionary e><perience; 71 Bibllography: p. SUMMARY: Traces the development of the independence movement in New JeJSey from 176310 the general brea.koutof hostilities in 1776. l. United States.-History-Revolution, 1775-1783-Causes. 2. New Jersey-History-Revo· lution, 1775-1783. [l. New Jersey-History-Revolution, 1775-1783. 2. United States-History - Revolution, 1 n5-1783 -Causes] I. Title. I!. Series. E263.NSN78 no. 7 [E210] 973.3'1 l 75-28186 Price:$.50 Designed by Peggy Lewis and Lee R. Parks Copyright"' 1975 by the New Jersey Historical Commission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 11IE NEW JERSEY HISTORICAL COMMISSION is an official agency of the state of New Jersey, in the division of the State Library, Archives and History Department of Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Documents
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS Thomas Paine's Response to Lord North's Speech on the British Peace Proposals Thomas Paine, whose book Common Sense proposed the formation of a "declaration for independence'* and stirred thousands to the cause of inde- pendence in 1776, supported the cause throughout the war effort with his American Crisis series of pamphlets and numerous newspaper publications. The newspapers played a crucial role in the American Revolution by supply- ing a war of words, which kept the colonists focused on their goal of inde- pendence. The printers had become active participants early in the war par- tially due to their anger at the British Stamp Act, which taxed newspapers.1 Writers, using multiple pseudonyms to mask their identities and produce an appearance of greater numbers, produced poems, essays, and letters for the newspapers to combat loyalists as well as the pernicious effects of fear and ignorance among the colonists.2 Paine's use of pseudonyms kept some of his newspaper contributions from being identified for many years. In 1951 A. Owen Aldridge identified a number of pieces, including an article written by Paine in York, Pennsyl- vania, on June 10,1778, and published in the Pennsylvania Gazette on June 13, 1778, signed "Common Sense," which had not been included in the published canon of Paine's writings.3 Similarly, it appears that Paine contrib- uted a letter and associated commentary in the April 25,1778, "Postscript" edition of the Pennsylvania Packet^ published in Lancaster, which has also been overlooked. Addressed to "R. L." and signed "T. P.," there is ample 1 Philip Davidson, Propaganda and the American Revolution 1763-1783 (Chapel Hill, 1941), 226.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Towne: the Precarious Career of a Persistent Printer
    Benjamin Towne: The Precarious Career of a Persistent Printer ENJAMIN TOWNE is remembered as the publisher of America's first daily newspaper, which he brought out in Philadelphia B in the spring of 1783.1 However, the fact that he was able to print a newspaper at all during the War for Independence testifies to persistence in the face of continuing adversity worthy of at least equal note.* Towne was a man of fascinatingly fluid political views; his little newspaper, the Pennsylvania Evening 'Posty shuttled repeatedly from one end of the Revolutionary political spectrum to the other during the war. From its founding early in 1775, it was firm in its opposition to England until British soldiers occupied Philadelphia in the fall of 1777. Towne, remaining in Philadelphia, then converted his news- paper into a warm supporter of the occupying force. Subsequently, when the British marched away in June, 1778, Benjamin Towne re- mained on hand, with an ostensibly "patriotic" Evening fW/, to welcome the Americans back. This printer has been a bit of a puzzle to historians, who have noted that he was "attainted'' of treason in 1777, but that the charge was later dropped. It has also been asserted that Towne "published his newspaper undisturbed"2 even after the Americans regained Philadelphia. If true, this apparent lack of restraint would be difficult to reconcile with Leonard W. Levy's generalization that the press was nowhere free during the Revolution.3 * This study was supported in part by the Research Committee of the Graduate School, University of Wisconsin, from special funds voted by the State Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • The ''Havoc of War'' and Its Aftermath in Revolutionary South Carolina
    The ''Havoc of War'' and its Aftermath in Revolutionary South Carolina by Jerome NADELHAFT* The approach of war between England and America inspired many privileged South Carolinians to announce their willingness to suffer for freedom's sake. They would move, disown America, or fight "rather than submit to tyranny.'' They did not ignore the possibility of dying, but since their cause was just, death would be noble, "generous", preferable to servitude. 1 That vision was shared by Richard Hutson, who wrote of the "awfully pleasing sight" of the British army and navy "most shamefully repulsed" when they attacked Charleston in 1776. Romantically, perhaps not inaccurately, he spread the tale of one sergeant, "McDougal by name," who "rivals Epaminondas in fame; when breathing his last, 'My brave lads,' he cries, 'I am just expiring, but for heaven's sake let not sweet liberty expire with me."' 2 Few Carolinians expressed an awareness that warfare consisted of more than noble gestures and deeds ; few seemed worried that military death could be inglorious. Josiah Smith, who was unwilling to submit "to the will & controul of a haughty and abaondoned sett of rulers," might have had such gloomy prospects in mind when he wrote that "horrible consequences" attended bloodshed. 3 So might Henry Laurens, whose son returned from England to fight and die in and for South Carolina. Ready "to hazard all ... [his] estate," Laurens worried that the British, encoura­ ging Indian attacks and slave insurrections, would cause the "most horri­ ble butcheries of innocent women & children," and that "civil discord between fellow citizens & neighbour Farmers" would lead to "fraud per­ jury & assassination." 4 Probably few people had the knowledge, or even willingness, to imagine the nature of South Carolina's Revolutionary War.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Government in North Carolina and the United States; a School
    ARTICLES OF CONFEDEEATION. xxxiii On the part and in behalf of the State of Delaware : Tho. M'Kean, February 13, 1779, Nicholas Van Dyke. John Dickinson, May 5, 1779, On the part and in behalf of the State of Maryland : John Hanson, March 1, 1781, Daniel Carroll, March 1, 1781. On the part and in behalf of the State of Virginia : Richard Henry Lee, Jn° Harvie, John Banister, Francis Lightfoot Lee. Thomas Adams, On the part and in behalf of the State of North Carolina: John Penn, July 81, 1778, Jn" Williams. Cornelius Hartnett, On the part and in behalf of the State of South Carolina : Henry Laurens, Richd Hutson, William Henry Drayton, Thos. Haywood, Jun. Jn° Matthews, On the part and in behalf of the State of Georgia : Jn° Walton, July 24, 1778, Edw-^ Langworthy. EdW^ Telfair, The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Con- gress on the 17th of November, 1777, and were recommended to the consideration of the several States. The Articles were submitted to the several States, and the delegates from the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Cai'olina ratified the Articles on the 9th of July, 1778. The delegates from the remaining States did not sign them on that date, but in the following order : North Carolina, July 21, 1778 ; Georgia, July 24, 1778 ; New Jersey, November 26, 1778 ; Delaware, May 5, 1779 ; and Maryland, March 1, 1781. Three and a half years elapsed after the adoption of the Articles by Congress before their ratification by all of the States.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JOSHUA HUDDY ERA Documents of the American
    THE JOSHUA HUDDY ERA Documents of the American Revolution CATALOG OF THE EXHIBITION at MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HEADQUARTERS 125 SYMMES DRIVE MANALAPAN, NJ OCTOBER 2004 Revised November 2004 Produced by the Monmouth County Archives 125 Symmes Drive Manalapan, NJ 07726 732- 308- 3771 http://visitmonmouth.com/archives THE JOSHUA HUDDY ERA Documents of the American Revolution CATALOG OF THE EXHIBITION at MONMOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY HEADQUARTERS 125 SYMMES DRIVE MANALAPAN, NJ OCTOBER 2004 Facsimiles of Revolutionary War-era documents from the David Library of the American Revolution, Library of Congress, Monmouth County Archives, Monmouth County Historical Association, New Jersey Historical Society, New Jersey State Archives, Alexander Library at Rutgers University, and Salem County Historical Society. Curated by Gary D. Saretzky Monmouth County Archivist with research, transcription, and captions by Shane Wilson; advice of historians David J. Fowler, James Raleigh, and Richard Walling; mounts and mats for exhibit cases by Eugene Osovitz; preliminary exhibition assistance by Rutgers Public History Intern Rachel Raimondo; editorial assistance by Patrick Caiazzo; exhibit label production by Joya Anderson; curved wall design and display by the Monmouth County Art Department under the direction of Roberta Ohliger. The cooperation of the following individuals is gratefully acknowledged: Ellen Callahan, Joseph Klett, and Greg Gill, New Jersey State Archives; Greg Johnson, David Library of the American Revolution; Chad Leinaweaver, New Jersey Historical Society; Donald L. Pierce, Salem County Historical Society; and Carla Tobias, Monmouth County Historical Association. This exhibition has been supported by a grant from the New Jersey Historical Commission, which is hereby acknowledged with gratitude for its continuing support of annual Archives Week activities at the Monmouth County Library since 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Account of the Old State House of Pennsylvania Now
    Independence Hall, 1876. FRONT VIEW. AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT UK THE OLD STATE HOUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA NOW KNOWN AS THE HALL OF INDEPENDENCE « BY / FRANK M ETTING WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY 1876 Copyright, 1874, By FRANK M ETTING KIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: •EREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. PREFACE In the work that I had " found for my hand to do," it became necessary to examine carefully into the details of the building of the State House of Pennsylvania ; much that surprised me came to light not only in the circumstances of its erection but in its subsequent C history. Instead of Dr. Kearsley, to whom the credit had been as- cribed, I discovered that its Architect and actual Builder was one of the greatest men ever fostered by Pennsylvania ; and that every important movement, from the very inception of the efforts of the colonists to assert their constitutional liberty, first assumed shape either within this building or under the shadow of its walls. A friendly suggestion thrown out induced me to extend still further my investigations, with a view of preserving the information in print in some accessible form. This desire was enhanced by the hope that the general public would ultimately share in the interest which every brick of this old build- ing possesses for me, and thus be inclined to lend each his individual aid towards its preservation, and to insure its proper custodianship for all time. The desultory way in which, from causes unnecessary to be detailed, my memoranda have been thrown together, must leave its impress, and I cannot expect to be exempt from inaccuracies ; but having done my best without fee or reward, present or prospective, I have no apologies to make to the public for claiming their notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents
    Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents 1 Wikijunior:United States Charters of Freedom 1 1.1 Important Documents ........................................... 1 1.2 Other Concepts .............................................. 2 2 Declaration of Independence 4 2.1 Background ................................................ 4 2.2 Draft and adoption ............................................. 4 2.3 Distribution and copies .......................................... 5 2.4 Text and analysis .............................................. 6 2.4.1 Introduction ............................................ 6 2.4.2 Preamble ............................................. 6 2.4.3 Indictment ............................................. 7 2.4.4 Denunciation ........................................... 8 2.4.5 Conclusion ............................................ 8 2.5 Text on the back of the document ..................................... 9 2.6 Differences between draft and final versions ................................ 9 2.7 Myths ................................................... 10 2.8 Questions ................................................. 10 2.9 Source ................................................... 11 3 Constitution 19 3.1 Background ................................................ 19 3.2 Text of the Constitution .......................................... 19 3.2.1 Preamble ............................................. 20 3.2.2 Article I .............................................. 21 3.2.3 Article II ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colonists Respond to the Coercive Acts & the Continental Congress
    MAKING THE REVOLUTION: AMERICA, 1763-1791 PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION Massachusetts Historical Society John Adams, letter to Abigail Adams, while serving as a delegate to the First Continental Congress, Philadelphia, 18 September 1774 (detail) “There is No Idea of Submission, here in any Bodies head” COLONISTS RESPOND TO THE COERCIVE ACTS & THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 1774 __A Selection from Newspaper Reports, Pamphlets, Letters, Resolutions, Sermons, Histories, &c.__ * 1773____ Dec. 16: BOSTON TEA PARTY climaxes protests against the Tea Act in the northern colonies. 1774____ March-June: COERCIVE ACTS (“Intolerable Acts” to the colonists) and the Quebec Act are passed by Parliament to punish and solidify imperial control of the colonies, especially Massachusetts. They are: – Boston Port Act Closed Boston harbor to shipping until full payment made for destroyed tea. – Massachusetts Govt. Act Placed colony under direct British rule; strictly limited town meetings. – Administration of Justice Act Allowed British officials accused of murdering colonists (or of other capital offenses) in line of duty to be sent to another colony or to Britain for trial. – Quartering Act Allowed governor to house British soldiers in unoccupied private buildings. – Quebec Act Extended boundaries of Quebec, formerly a French territory, to include Ohio River Valley where many Americans hoped to settle. Allowed province to maintain French law and the official state religion of Roman Catholicism. Sept-Oct.: FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS is held in Philadelphia with delegates from all colonies except Georgia; organizes a “Continental Association” to boycott British goods after Dec. 1 if the Intolerable Acts are not repealed; agrees to meet the following May if necessary; sends a petition to King George III that is rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Continental Congress and the Problem of American Rights
    The First Continental Congress and the Problem of American Rights N OCTOBER 1774 JOSEPH GALLOWAY left the First Continental Congress frustrated and angry, sentiments he soon after expressed Ipublicly, accusing his opponents in Philadelphia of adopting "untenable principles, and thence rearing the most wild and chimerical superstructures." He condemned what he thought were the absurd arguments and baseless assertions made by his congressional adversaries as they debated Parliament's authority over the colonies and attempted to define American liberties in a Declaration of Rights. "Even the authors themselves," he complained bitterly, "finding that they have conveyed no satisfactory idea to the intelligent mind, of either the extent of parliamentary authority, or the rights of America, have exploded them, and taken new ground, which will be found to be equally indefensible." What is worse, they were leading America down the wrong path, "bewildered among the erroneous principles upon which her advocates have attempted in vain to support her rights."1 The men who had dominated Congress and pushed through the Declaration of Rights were duping the people and manipulating public opinion, groaned Galloway, convinced that congressional leaders only pretended to seek reconciliation when what they really wanted was independence. Explicitly he berated them for their inconsistency; implicitly he questioned their sincerity as well. Galloway was hardly the first to impugn both the motives and the logic of those who eventually became revolutionaries. General Thomas Gage had said much the same thing six years before. Writing from his New York headquarters he advised William Barrington, the secretary at war, that those 1 [Joseph Galloway], A Candid Examination of the Mutual Claims of Great-Britain, and the Colonies (New York, 1775), 2,3,24.
    [Show full text]