DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment West Kingman Traffic Interchange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment West Kingman Traffic Interchange Draft Environmental Assessment West Kingman Traffic Interchange Interstate 40 MP 48.32 to MP 51.75 (Stockton Hill Road) US Route 93 MP 69.60 to MP 71 Mohave County, Arizona Federal Aid No. 040-A(212)N ADOT (TRACS) No. 040 MO 048 H7993 01L May 2020 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by the Arizona Department of Transportation pursuant to 23 United States Code 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated April 16, 2019, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration and the Arizona Department of Transportation. DocuSign Envelope ID: F1D5AED4-DF23-48B5-B2F4-5A4E8E30C62E Draft Environmental Assessment for West Kingman Traffic Interchange Mohave County, Arizona Federal Aid No. 040-A(212)N ADOT Project No. 040 MO 048 H7993 01L May 2020 5/6/2020 Approved by: Date: Paul O’Brien, PE Administrator Environmental Planning Arizona Department of Transportation This environmental assessment has been prepared in accordance with provisions and requirements of Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 771 and 774, relating to the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 United States Code 4332(2)(c)]. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by the Arizona Department of Transportation pursuant to 23 United States Code 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated April 16, 2019, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration and the Arizona Department of Transportation. I-40/US93 West Kingman System Traffic Interchange Draft Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. iii List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................. iv List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................... v Environmental Commitments ............................................................................................................ viii Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................... ix I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 A. Explanation of an Environmental Assessment ....................................................................................... 1 B. Project Location ..................................................................................................................................... 1 C. Project Background and Overview ......................................................................................................... 4 II. Project Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................6 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 6 B. Need ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 C. Need Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 D. Conformance with Regulations, Land Use Plans, and Other ................................................................. 9 III. Alternatives........................................................................................................................... 10 A. Prior Studies and Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 10 B. Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................................................... 13 C. General Project Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 14 IV. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation ......................................... 15 A. Issues Eliminated from Detailed Study ................................................................................................ 15 B. Land Ownership, Jurisdiction, and Land Use ....................................................................................... 15 C. Social and Economic Considerations .................................................................................................... 21 D. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and Environmental Justice ........................................ 29 E. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................... 35 F. Section 4(f) Resources .......................................................................................................................... 42 G. Traffic and Transportation ................................................................................................................... 49 H. Air Quality Analysis............................................................................................................................... 52 I. Noise Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 61 J. Utilities ................................................................................................................................................. 70 K. Visual Resources ................................................................................................................................... 73 i May 2020 NH-NHFP-040-A(212)S 040 MO 048 H7993 01C I-40/US93 West Kingman System Traffic Interchange Draft Environmental Assessment Table of Contents L. Drainage and Floodplain Considerations ............................................................................................. 78 M. Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ............................................................................................................................... 81 N. Biological Resources ............................................................................................................................. 85 O. Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................................................ 94 P. Material Sources and Waste Materials ................................................................................................ 99 Q. Secondary Effects ............................................................................................................................... 100 R. Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 103 V. Public and Agency Coordination ............................................................................................ 109 A. Public Involvement ............................................................................................................................. 109 B. Agency Involvement ........................................................................................................................... 110 VI. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 114 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Project Vicinity ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Level of Service ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4. 2019 Existing Peak Hour Conditions at the Beale Street TI ................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Projected 2040 Peak Hour Conditions at the Beale Street TI ................................................................ 8 Figure 6. 2015 Draft DCR and Working Draft EA Alternatives ............................................................................ 12 Figure 7. Current Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 8. Future Land Use in the Project Vicinity per City of Kingman General Plan Update 2030.................... 18 Figure 9. Parcels Affected by the Preferred Alternative ..................................................................................... 20 Figure 10. Census Tracts and Block Groups .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Dakota Rangelands: More Than a Sea of Grass
    212 RANGELANDS 18(6), December 1996 South Dakota Rangelands: More than a Sea of Grass F. Robert Gartner and Carolyn Hull Sieg re-settlement explorers described the region's land- the continent. Elevation increases from about 900 to 1,500 scape as a "sea of grass." Yet, this "sea" was quite feet above sea level along the eastern border to 3,000 to p varied, and included a wealth of less obvious forested 3,500 feet along the western border. The highest point in communities. Both physiographic and climatic gradients the United States east of the Rocky Mountains is Harney across the state of South Dakota contributed to the devel- Peak in the Black Hills at 7,241 feet elevation. opment of variable vegetation types of South Dakota. The The major portion of the state lies within the Great Plains diverse flora truly identifies the state as a "Land of Infinite physiographicprovince (Fig. 1), and a smaller portion in the Variety." Variations in climate, soils, and topography help to Central Lowlands Province (Denson 1964). The Great accentuate this label. Large herbivores such as bison and Plains Province is a broad highland that slopes gradually periodic fires ignited by lightning and American Indians also eastward from the Rocky Mountains on the west to the contributed to the formation of the pre-settlement land- Central Lowlands on the east. That portion of the Great scape. Plains Province in the western two-thirds of South Dakota has been termed the Missouri Plateau by some authors. The Central Lowlands Province extends from the drainage Climate Topography, Physiography, basin of the James River (approximatelythe 99th Meridian) eastward.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity September 2016
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 September 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 1001 0 1 117 0 0 21 17,405 2 1001 100 2 204 0 4 39 17,049 3 0000 0 3 70 0 0 26 20,583 4 0000 0 4 66 1 7 19 129,883 5 1001 57 5 156 0 1 16 20,702 Total 3003 157 Total 613 1 12 121 205,622 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 97.9% 0.2% 1.9% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 1001800,909 0 2 0000 00 3 0010 00 3 1001 48,0570 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001185,079 1 5 1001 362,895 1 Total 2012985,988 1 Total 2002 410,952 1 % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 4004 361,965 0 4 0000 00 4 1001 44,9160 5 0000 00 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 0000 00 Total 60062,054,130 0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 11/16/2016 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU to
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment
    BUREAU OF RECLAMATION YUMA COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADOT GRANT NO.E5S2Z Final Report ROLLE AIRFIELD SAN LUIS, ARIZONA | APRIL 2017 Environmental Assessment Rolle Airfield San Luis, Arizona Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office 7301 Calle Agua Salada Yuma, Arizona 85364 Prepared by: Armstrong Consultants, Inc. 2345 S. Alma School Road Mesa, Arizona 85210 In associated with: The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC SWCA Environmental Consultants, Inc. Yuma County Airport Authority ADOT Grant Number: E5S2Z April 2017 | version 1.0 Yuma County Airport Authority 2191 East 32nd street Yuma, Arizona | 85365 Environmental Assessment Rolle Airfield April 2017 Version 1.0 This environmental assessment has been prepared in accordance with provisions and requirements of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500 et seq. relating to the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Proposed Action................................................................................................................. 1-3 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: a Historical Perspective
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences Great Plains Studies, Center for Fall 2002 Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: A Historical Perspective Dallas Virchow University of Nebraska - Lincoln Scott E. Hygnstrom University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Virchow, Dallas and Hygnstrom, Scott E., "Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: A Historical Perspective" (2002). Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 609. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch/609 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Great Plains Research 12 (Fall 2002): 197 -218 © Copyright by the Center for Great Plains Studies DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BLACK­ TAILED PRAIRIE DOGS IN THE GREAT PLAINS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Dallas R. Virchow and Scott E. Hygnstrom School of Natural Resource Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0759 [email protected] ABSTRACT -It is a common belief that the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) was an extremely abundant species throughout the Great Plains prior to European settlement. We examined accounts from explorers, naturalists, and travelers in the Great Plains in the 19th and 20th centuries and found few that adequately document the relative abundance and distribution to support this view.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistrurus Catenatus) in Colorado
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School THE MASSASAUGA RATTLESNAKE (SISTRURUS CATENATUS) IN COLORADO A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Justin Peter Hobert College of Arts and Sciences Department of Biological Sciences August, 1997 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © 1997 JUSTIN PETER HOBERT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THESIS COMMITTEE: *THESIS SPONSOR (Stephen P. Mackessy, PhTD.) (William. E. Harmon, Ph.D.) (David Chiszar, Phdj.) DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL yle R. Carter, Ph.D.) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT Hobert, Justin Peter. The massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) in Colorado. Published Master of Arts Thesis, University of Northern Colorado, 1997. The massasauga rattlesnake, Sistrurus catenatus, is currently considered a species of special concern by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. From. July, 1994 to October, 1996, 255 massasaugas were captured or recovered from 11 counties in Colorado. Life history and distribution were investigated for the massasauga in Colorado, including an analysis of the distribution pattern and habitat characteristics at sites of capture and recovery. Information gathered included trends in population size and abundance, areal vegetative analysis, seasonal/temporal activity patterns, reproduction, and prey and predators. This study also investigated the morphological variation of the massasauga from Colorado and an evaluation of its current taxonomic status relative to S. c. edwardsi and S. c. tergeminus, the neighboring subspecies. Morphometric characters from samples from each group were measured and examined for diagnostic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the United States Army in the Exploration And
    THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY IN THE EXPLORATION AND MAPPING OF THE KANSAS AREA: 1806- 1845 Lieutenant Colonel John B. Garver, Jr. * United States Military Academy The military campaigns between the United States Army and the plains Indians of the trans-Mississippi West have been the subject of many books and articles, both popular and scholarly. Some writers have emphasized the romantic aspects of frontier military service; others have portrayed the soldier as a ruthless and persistent threat to the simple life of the noble Indian. Few have attempted critically and objectively to describe and inter- pret the broader role of the United States Army in the story of national development, that is, as an agent of coloniza- tion in the West.l Fewer still have written from an historical-geographical perspective. As early as 1893, Frederick Jackson Turner described the spatial movement of Americans west as a cultural suc- cession of frontier types. Stand at Cumberland Gap and watch the pro- cession of civilization, marching single file-- the buffalo following the trail to the salt springs, the Indian, the fur-trader and hunter, *Lieutenant Colonel Garver is an assistant professor of geography at the united States Military Academy IThe first substantial contribution in this regard was the early work of Henry P. Beers, The Western Military Frontier 1815-1846 (1935). More recent book length publi- cations include: Averam B. Bender, The March of Empire (1952); W. Turrentine Jackson, Wagon Roads West (1952); Francis P. Prucha, Broadax and Bayonet (1953); and William H. Goetzmann, Army Exploration in the American West (1959), and Exploration and Empire (1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 December 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 0000 0 1 100 0 0 16 8,390 2 0010 0 2 184 0 3 36 20,926 3 0000 0 3 138 1 5 43 85,453 4 0000 0 4 54 0 5 19 47,590 5 0000 0 5 136 0 0 14 57,712 Total 0010 0 Total 612 1 13 128 220,071 % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % 97.8% 0.2% 2.1% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 1011184,065 0 1 20021,032,787 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0010 00 4 20025,351,672 0 4 0000 00 5 0000 00 5 0000 00 Total 30135,535,737 0 Total 20121,032,787 0 % 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 1001 162,272 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0000 00 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001954,568 1 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 1001954,568 1 Total 20021,809,521 0 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 1/18/2017 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Ryan Ewing
    Inquest: Steven Ryan Ewing Release Date: November 4, 2008 THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA IN THE MATTER OF: THE FATALITY INQUIRIES ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF: STEVEN RYAN EWING, Deceased Report on Inquest of The Honourable Judge Robert Cummings Issued this 30th day of October, 2008. APPEARANCES: Mr. Marty Minuk, Counsel to Inquest Ms. Betty Owen, Inquest Coordinator Mr. William Burnett and Mr. Jim Edmond, Counsel for Hudson's Bay Mining and Smelting Co. Limited Ms. Marjorie Webb, Counsel for Workplace Safety and Health Inquest: Steven Ryan Ewing Mr. John Harvie and Mr. Andrew King, Counsel for United Steelworkers of America Mr. Vair Clendenning, representative International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Mr. Brian Short, representative International Brotherhood of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Mr. Pete Walker, Health & Safety Representative, Manitoba Federation of Labour Mr. Paul Garrett, Union of Welders and Boilermakers Release Date: November 4 , 2008 IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA THE FATALITY INQUIRIES ACT Report by Provincial Judge on Inquest RESPECTING THE DEATH OF STEVEN RYAN EWING An inquest respecting the said death having been held by me. I hereby report as follows: The name of the deceased is Steven Ryan Ewing. I hereby make the following recommendations as set out in the attached report. Attached hereto and forming party of my report is a schedule of all exhibits required to be filed by me. Dated at the City of Brandon, in Manitoba, this 30th day of October, 2008. i “Originally signed by Judge Robert Cummings” _______________________
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 August 2017 Office of Consumer Financial Protection and Access INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 8/1/2017 THRU 8/31/2017 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 1 0 0 1 758 1 147 0 0 15 25,587 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 262 0 2 52 51,362 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 154 0 7 33 8,989 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 39 0 4 15 48,356 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 215 0 1 15 39,230 Total 1 0 0 1 758 Total 817 0 14 130 173,524 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 98.3% 0.0% 1.7% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 3 00 31,986,472 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 21,341,052 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 32,899,688 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 351,380 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 22,988,321 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 0 0 11 9,566,913 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup.
    [Show full text]
  • RANGELAND COVER TYPES of the United States
    RANGELAND COVER TYPES of the United States Thomas N. Shiflet, Editor Society for Range Management 1994 Rangeland Cover Types of the United States Thomas N. Shiflet, Editor Society for Range Management 1839 York Street Denver, Colorado 80206 1994 COVER SKETCH: The Society for Range Management extends its appreciation to Bridgett S. Crane for her original sketch specifically designed for the cover of Rangeland Cover Types of the United States. Copyright © 1994, by the Society for Range Management All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review for the public press. First Edition ISBN l-884930-01-8 Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 94-065345 Printed in the United States of America ll CONTENTS Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................ nI Preface................................................................................................................................................ IX Introduction........................................................................................................................................ XI Definition of Rangeland Cover Type............................................................................................ x1 Criteria for Recognition of Types . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. x1 Cover Type Nomenclature . x1 Plant Names . x1 Numbering
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Strategies in the Arctic
    valdaiclub.com RUSSIAN STRATEGIES IN THE ARCTIC: Moscow, September 2014 Moscow, AVOIDING A NEW COLD WAR Valdai Discussion Club Grantees Report This report was prepared on the basis of the research within the framework of the Research Grants Program of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club. Authors: Lassi Heininen, Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, Finland Alexander Sergunin, Professor, Department of International Relations, School of International Relations, St. Petersburg State University Gleb Yarovoy, Associate professor, Department of International Relations, Petrozavodsk State University The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Valdai Discussion Club, neither of any organizations the authors have been affiliated with or may be affiliated in future. ISBN 978–5-906757–05–0 3 Russia and Territorial 49 Introduction Disputes in the Arctic The U.S.-Russian Dispute 49 on the Bering Sea 8 Analysis of the The Russian-Norwegian 55 Current Situation Dispute on the Barents Sea Russian Claims on the Arctic 61 Russian National Interests in 9 Continental Shelf the Arctic Northern Sea Route 66 Russia’s Arctic Doctrines 16 Climate Change and the 72 Environment Russia’s Energy Policies 76 Assessing the 21 in the Arctic Russia’s Military Policies 79 Problems of the in the Arctic Russian Arctic Indigenous Peoples Policy 84 in the Arctic Russia’s Relations with 22 Major Arctic Players U.S.-Russia 22 87 Canada-Russia 25 Conclusions and Russia-Norway 36 Scenarios for the Russia-Denmark 40 Future Russia’s Relations with 41 East Asian Countries 93 NATO and Russia in the Arctic 43 References EU, Russia and the Arctic 46 Russian Strategies in the Arctic: Avoiding a New Cold War INTRODUCTION 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Seas in the Arctic Region 219
    Freedom of the Seas in the Arctic Region 219 Chapter 9 Freedom of the Seas in the Arctic Region J. Ashley Roach This chapter begins with the basics: geography, legal regime, and navigation of the Arctic Ocean. It next seeks to explain what is meant by “freedom of the seas.” The third section, providing U.S. and Canadian views, examines the importance of freedom of the seas and discusses the threats posed by China, Iran and Russia to those freedoms notwith- standing their commitments to the rules in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).1 The chapter concludes with some views on a future Arctic Ocean in 2040. Four appendices on 1) the legal regime of the Arctic Ocean, 2) straits used for international navigation in the Arctic Ocean, 3) maritime boundaries in the Arctic Ocean, and 4) extended continental shelves in the Arctic Ocean are provided at the end and provide further details. Geography of the Arctic Region In contrast to Antarctica, the Arctic Region includes the five states surrounding the Arctic Ocean—Canada, Denmark (Greenland), Nor- way, Russia and the United States—and the straits used for internation- al navigation to and from the Arctic Ocean—Bering Strait, Northwest Passage, Northeast Passage/Northern Sea Route, and the Nares, Da- vis, Fram and Denmark Straits (for details see appendix 2). Another three states have land territory north of the Arctic Circle (66º33’39’’ N)—Iceland, northern Sweden, and northern Finland. More specifically, the land territory of circumpolar states north of the Arctic Circle includes northern Alaska, northern mainland Cana- da abutting the Bering Sea (the Northwest Territories), the Canadian Arctic islands (which Canada calls the Canadian “arctic archipelago”2), Greenland (Denmark), Iceland, Svalbard/Spitzbergen (Norway), northern Norway, northern Sweden, northern Finland, and the Rus- 219 220 the arctic and world order Map 1.
    [Show full text]