DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Assessment for Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Assessment for Department DOE/EA-1797 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE FOR THE AGUA CALIENTE SOLAR PROJECT IN YUMA COUNTY, ARIZONA U.S. Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program Office Washington, DC 20585 November 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary .................................................................................................................ES-1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................ES-1 Purpose and Need ...............................................................................................................ES-1 Proposed Action and Alternatives........................................................................................ES-2 Summary of Environmental Effects......................................................................................ES-2 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of and Need for Action ................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of this Environmental Assessment .................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Public Participation ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Document Organization................................................................................................ 1-5 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Description of Proposed Action .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 The Proposed Project and Site......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Permits and Authorizations............................................................................. 2-10 2.1.3 Applicant-Committed Minimization Measures ................................................ 2-11 2.2 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated ..................................................................... 2-11 2.3 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................. 2-13 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects.............................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Regulatory Framework...................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Affected Environment........................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.3 Environmental Effects....................................................................................... 3-5 3.3 Visual Resources.......................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Affected Environment........................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.2 Environmental Effects....................................................................................... 3-8 3.4 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.4.1 Regulatory Background .................................................................................. 3-14 3.4.2 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-16 3.4.3 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-19 3.5 Noise...........................................................................................................................3-26 3.5.1 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-26 3.5.2 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-27 3.6 Geology and Soils....................................................................................................... 3-29 3.6.1 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-29 3.6.2 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-32 3.7 Water Resources........................................................................................................ 3-32 3.7.1 Regulatory Framework.................................................................................... 3-32 3.7.2 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-33 3.7.3 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-37 3.8 Biological Resources .................................................................................................. 3-40 3.8.1 Regulatory Framework.................................................................................... 3-40 3.8.2 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-40 3.8.3 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-47 3.9 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................... 3-50 3.9.1 Regulatory Framework.................................................................................... 3-50 3.9.2 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-50 November 2010 Environmental Assessment i Guarantee of the Agua Caliente Solar Project Table of Contents 3.9.3 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-51 3.10 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice .............................................................. 3-52 3.10.1 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-52 3.10.2 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-54 3.11 Public Health and Safety ............................................................................................ 3-55 3.11.1 Regulatory Framework.................................................................................... 3-55 3.11.2 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-57 3.11.3 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-57 3.12 Transportation............................................................................................................. 3-60 3.12.1 Affected Environment...................................................................................... 3-60 3.12.2 Environmental Effects..................................................................................... 3-61 Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects.................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Area of Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Past and Present Actions ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Reasonably Foreseeable Actions................................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Cumulative Effects Analysis ......................................................................................... 4-4 Chapter 5 List of Preparers...................................................................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 List of Entities Contacted....................................................................................... 6-1 Chapter 7 References............................................................................................................... 7-1 FIGURES Figure ES-1 General Location of the Project........................................................................ES-3 Figure 2-1 Project Site Plan ................................................................................................. 2-2 Figure 2-2 Artist’s Rendering of Agua Caliente Solar Project.............................................. 2-3 Figure 3-1 Land Use Designations ...................................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3-2 Land Ownership ................................................................................................. 3-4 Figure 3-3 Local Land Use................................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-4 Location of Key Observation Points ................................................................. 3-10 Figure 3-5 Visual Simulation from KOP A.........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Dakota Rangelands: More Than a Sea of Grass
    212 RANGELANDS 18(6), December 1996 South Dakota Rangelands: More than a Sea of Grass F. Robert Gartner and Carolyn Hull Sieg re-settlement explorers described the region's land- the continent. Elevation increases from about 900 to 1,500 scape as a "sea of grass." Yet, this "sea" was quite feet above sea level along the eastern border to 3,000 to p varied, and included a wealth of less obvious forested 3,500 feet along the western border. The highest point in communities. Both physiographic and climatic gradients the United States east of the Rocky Mountains is Harney across the state of South Dakota contributed to the devel- Peak in the Black Hills at 7,241 feet elevation. opment of variable vegetation types of South Dakota. The The major portion of the state lies within the Great Plains diverse flora truly identifies the state as a "Land of Infinite physiographicprovince (Fig. 1), and a smaller portion in the Variety." Variations in climate, soils, and topography help to Central Lowlands Province (Denson 1964). The Great accentuate this label. Large herbivores such as bison and Plains Province is a broad highland that slopes gradually periodic fires ignited by lightning and American Indians also eastward from the Rocky Mountains on the west to the contributed to the formation of the pre-settlement land- Central Lowlands on the east. That portion of the Great scape. Plains Province in the western two-thirds of South Dakota has been termed the Missouri Plateau by some authors. The Central Lowlands Province extends from the drainage Climate Topography, Physiography, basin of the James River (approximatelythe 99th Meridian) eastward.
    [Show full text]
  • SATS Final Transit Element Report
    PPPINAL CCCOUNTY small area transportation study FINAL Transit Element Report PPPREPARED FFFOROROR ::: PPPINAL CCCOUNTY DDDEVELOPMENT SSSERVICES DDDEPARTMENT OF PPPUBLIC WWWORKS PPPREPARED BBBYYY::: KKKIRKHAM MMMICHAEL CCCONSULTING EEENGINEERS IIININ AAASSOCIATIONASSOCIATION WITH LLLIMA &&& AAASSOCIATES August 2006 KM Project # 0504900 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXISTING TRANSIT CONDITIONS ..............................................................1 1.1 Existing Transit Characteristics ................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Demographics ....................................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Current Mode to Work .......................................................................................................2 1.2 Existing Transit Services ............................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Coolidge Cotton Express....................................................................................................2 1.2.2 Inter-city Bus Service..........................................................................................................3 1.2.3 Special Needs Transit Services ...........................................................................................4 1.2.4 Amtrak Passenger Rail Service ...........................................................................................4 1.2.5 Regional Airport Shuttle .....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity September 2016
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 September 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 1001 0 1 117 0 0 21 17,405 2 1001 100 2 204 0 4 39 17,049 3 0000 0 3 70 0 0 26 20,583 4 0000 0 4 66 1 7 19 129,883 5 1001 57 5 156 0 1 16 20,702 Total 3003 157 Total 613 1 12 121 205,622 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 97.9% 0.2% 1.9% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 1001800,909 0 2 0000 00 3 0010 00 3 1001 48,0570 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001185,079 1 5 1001 362,895 1 Total 2012985,988 1 Total 2002 410,952 1 % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 4004 361,965 0 4 0000 00 4 1001 44,9160 5 0000 00 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 0000 00 Total 60062,054,130 0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 11/16/2016 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU to
    [Show full text]
  • SR 347 Final Environmental Assessment
    Intentional blank page Intentional blank page Intentional blank page Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Summary of the Environmental Assessment .......................................................................................... 1 C. Selected Alternative ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................. 3 III. Errata From Draft Environmental Assessment ...................................................................................... 10 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................................................... 10 O. Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Public Comments ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
    Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment
    BUREAU OF RECLAMATION YUMA COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADOT GRANT NO.E5S2Z Final Report ROLLE AIRFIELD SAN LUIS, ARIZONA | APRIL 2017 Environmental Assessment Rolle Airfield San Luis, Arizona Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office 7301 Calle Agua Salada Yuma, Arizona 85364 Prepared by: Armstrong Consultants, Inc. 2345 S. Alma School Road Mesa, Arizona 85210 In associated with: The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC SWCA Environmental Consultants, Inc. Yuma County Airport Authority ADOT Grant Number: E5S2Z April 2017 | version 1.0 Yuma County Airport Authority 2191 East 32nd street Yuma, Arizona | 85365 Environmental Assessment Rolle Airfield April 2017 Version 1.0 This environmental assessment has been prepared in accordance with provisions and requirements of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500 et seq. relating to the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Proposed Action................................................................................................................. 1-3 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Area Transportation Plan Transportation Master Plan & Regional Connectivity Plan December 2015
    Area Transportation Plan Transportation Master Plan & Regional Connectivity Plan December 2015 FINAL REPORT Prepared by : AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN Transportation Master Plan & Regional Connectivity Plan Prepared by Engineers & Architects December, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Area Transportation Plan (ATP), comprised of a Transportation Master Plan and Regional Connectivity Plan, was developed with the extensive participation of City officials, staff, stakeholders, and the public. A special thanks is extended to the following individuals for their participation and insight that lead to the approval of the Plan by Maricopa’s City Council on December 15, 2015. City Council City Staff Mayor Christian Price City Manager Gregory Rose Vice Mayor Marvin L. Brown Dana Burkhardt, General Plan Update Project Councilmember Peggy Chapados Manager Councilmember Bridger Kimball Bill Faye, Director of Public Works Councilmember Vincent Manfredi David R. Maestas, ATP Project Manager Councilmember Nancy Smith Kazi Neaz-E-Haque, Zoning Administrator Councilmember Henry Wade Rodolofo Lopez, Senior Planner Joshua Plumb, Engineering/Floodplain Manager Transportation Advisory Committee Rob Dolson, Engineering Inspector Committee Chair Joel Saurey Committee Member Brian Hoffman ATP Technical Advisory Group Committee Member Christopher Labye Tim Strow, Maricopa Association of Committee Member Glen Chern Governments Committee Member Harold Cole Doug Hansen, Pinal County Committee Member James Jordan Travis Ashbaugh, Pinal County Committee Member Ken Austin Charla
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal County Transit Governance Study Technical Working Group Meeting #1 October 30, 2019 Agenda
    Pinal County Transit Governance Study Technical Working Group Meeting #1 October 30, 2019 Agenda • Welcome and Introductions • Project Overview • Pinal County and Public Transit: Existing Conditions, Needs and Opportunities • Discussion: Pinal County Transit Service Goals and Opportunities • Peer Review • Next Steps Project Overview Develop structure and system to govern regional transit investments • Service goals • Service network and markets • Performance expectations • Sharing and allocating funds • Decision making and policy development • Flexibility to accommodate growth and change Schedule Fall 2019 Winter Spring Summer Fall Refined Scope of Work Existing Transit Service and Governance Structures Governance Peer Review Governance Assessment and Recommendations Governance Implementation Schedule Document Title VI Implementation Activities TWG Meetings – Proposed Schedule No. Meeting Topic / Goal Indicative Schedule 1 Existing Conditions, Opportunities and Needs October 30, 2019 Identify Peer Communities / Agencies 2 Draft Findings: Peer Review January, 2020 Discuss: Governance Options and Strategies 3 Stakeholder Workshop #1: March, 2020 Transit Service Design, Governance and Options 4 Draft Findings: Governance Assessment and Recommendations June, 2020 Discuss Implementation Schedule 5 Stakeholder Workshop #2: August, 2020 Draft Recommendations 6 Discuss: Draft Final Recommendations and Implementation October, 2020 Schedule Schedule Fall 2019 Winter Spring Summer Fall Refined Scope of Work Existing Transit Service and Governance
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: a Historical Perspective
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences Great Plains Studies, Center for Fall 2002 Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: A Historical Perspective Dallas Virchow University of Nebraska - Lincoln Scott E. Hygnstrom University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Virchow, Dallas and Hygnstrom, Scott E., "Distribution and Abundance of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs in the Great Plains: A Historical Perspective" (2002). Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 609. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch/609 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Great Plains Research 12 (Fall 2002): 197 -218 © Copyright by the Center for Great Plains Studies DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BLACK­ TAILED PRAIRIE DOGS IN THE GREAT PLAINS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Dallas R. Virchow and Scott E. Hygnstrom School of Natural Resource Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0759 [email protected] ABSTRACT -It is a common belief that the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) was an extremely abundant species throughout the Great Plains prior to European settlement. We examined accounts from explorers, naturalists, and travelers in the Great Plains in the 19th and 20th centuries and found few that adequately document the relative abundance and distribution to support this view.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistrurus Catenatus) in Colorado
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School THE MASSASAUGA RATTLESNAKE (SISTRURUS CATENATUS) IN COLORADO A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Justin Peter Hobert College of Arts and Sciences Department of Biological Sciences August, 1997 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © 1997 JUSTIN PETER HOBERT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THESIS COMMITTEE: *THESIS SPONSOR (Stephen P. Mackessy, PhTD.) (William. E. Harmon, Ph.D.) (David Chiszar, Phdj.) DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL yle R. Carter, Ph.D.) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT Hobert, Justin Peter. The massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) in Colorado. Published Master of Arts Thesis, University of Northern Colorado, 1997. The massasauga rattlesnake, Sistrurus catenatus, is currently considered a species of special concern by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. From. July, 1994 to October, 1996, 255 massasaugas were captured or recovered from 11 counties in Colorado. Life history and distribution were investigated for the massasauga in Colorado, including an analysis of the distribution pattern and habitat characteristics at sites of capture and recovery. Information gathered included trends in population size and abundance, areal vegetative analysis, seasonal/temporal activity patterns, reproduction, and prey and predators. This study also investigated the morphological variation of the massasauga from Colorado and an evaluation of its current taxonomic status relative to S. c. edwardsi and S. c. tergeminus, the neighboring subspecies. Morphometric characters from samples from each group were measured and examined for diagnostic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the United States Army in the Exploration And
    THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY IN THE EXPLORATION AND MAPPING OF THE KANSAS AREA: 1806- 1845 Lieutenant Colonel John B. Garver, Jr. * United States Military Academy The military campaigns between the United States Army and the plains Indians of the trans-Mississippi West have been the subject of many books and articles, both popular and scholarly. Some writers have emphasized the romantic aspects of frontier military service; others have portrayed the soldier as a ruthless and persistent threat to the simple life of the noble Indian. Few have attempted critically and objectively to describe and inter- pret the broader role of the United States Army in the story of national development, that is, as an agent of coloniza- tion in the West.l Fewer still have written from an historical-geographical perspective. As early as 1893, Frederick Jackson Turner described the spatial movement of Americans west as a cultural suc- cession of frontier types. Stand at Cumberland Gap and watch the pro- cession of civilization, marching single file-- the buffalo following the trail to the salt springs, the Indian, the fur-trader and hunter, *Lieutenant Colonel Garver is an assistant professor of geography at the united States Military Academy IThe first substantial contribution in this regard was the early work of Henry P. Beers, The Western Military Frontier 1815-1846 (1935). More recent book length publi- cations include: Averam B. Bender, The March of Empire (1952); W. Turrentine Jackson, Wagon Roads West (1952); Francis P. Prucha, Broadax and Bayonet (1953); and William H. Goetzmann, Army Exploration in the American West (1959), and Exploration and Empire (1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 December 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 0000 0 1 100 0 0 16 8,390 2 0010 0 2 184 0 3 36 20,926 3 0000 0 3 138 1 5 43 85,453 4 0000 0 4 54 0 5 19 47,590 5 0000 0 5 136 0 0 14 57,712 Total 0010 0 Total 612 1 13 128 220,071 % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % 97.8% 0.2% 2.1% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 1011184,065 0 1 20021,032,787 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0010 00 4 20025,351,672 0 4 0000 00 5 0000 00 5 0000 00 Total 30135,535,737 0 Total 20121,032,787 0 % 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 1001 162,272 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0000 00 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001954,568 1 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 1001954,568 1 Total 20021,809,521 0 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 1/18/2017 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU
    [Show full text]