Sedimentary and Petrologic Analysis of the Mississippian Price Formation at Sherwood Lake, West Virginia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sedimentary and Petrologic Analysis of the Mississippian Price Formation at Sherwood Lake, West Virginia Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2002 Sedimentary and petrologic analysis of the Mississippian Price Formation at Sherwood Lake, West Virginia Laura Ruth Sheehan West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Sheehan, Laura Ruth, "Sedimentary and petrologic analysis of the Mississippian Price Formation at Sherwood Lake, West Virginia" (2002). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 1535. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1535 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEDIMENTARY AND PETROLOGIC ANALYSIS OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN PRICE FORMATION AT SHERWOOD LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA Laura R. Sheehan Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Committee members: Dr. Richard Smosna, Ph.D. Dr. Thomas Kammer, Ph.D. Dr. Helen Lang, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2002 Keywords: Price Formation, Mississippian, Petrology, Sedimentology Depositional facies determinations of the upper member of the Price Formation were made based on detailed descriptions of the six outcrops exposed along Sherwood Lake Road, Greenbrier County, West Virginia. Units were placed into one of seven facies: fluvial, distributary channels, crevasse-splays, swamp, beach-bar, lagoon, and interdistributary bay. Sandstone units of the respective facies were then petrographically analyzed. Petrographic analysis indicates that there are distinct differences in mineralogies among the facies, particularly in the type of lithic grains present within the sandstones. High percentages of schist and phyllite rock fragments within the upper-delta-plain facies indicate that the parent material for the Price in southern West Virginia was dominantly metamorphic. Percentages of rock fragments change sytematically down the regional slope; upper-delta-plain facies have high percentages of metamorphic rock fragments (schist and phyllite) and lower-delta-plain facies have abundant sedimentary rock fragments (shale). The change in rock fragments down the paleo slope can be attributed to 1) increased mechanical degradation of metamorphic rock fragments with greater distance from the source area and 2) the introduction of sedimentary rocks fragments that were locally derived from within the mud-rich beds, typically more common in the lower portions of the deltaic system. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Written endeavors such as this are rarely the work of one person. I wish to acknowledge the assistance that many of my colleagues and professors have given to me, and extend particular thanks to certain individuals. My advisor Dr. Richard Smosna was not only an invaluable source of information, ideas and critical comments, but he was also an enthusiastic supporter of this particular project. The time and energy which he put into this mission is much appreciated, and for all of this I owe him many thanks. Dr. Thomas Kammer generously gave his time to explain the stratigraphy and nomenclature of the Price in great detail, and also lended his guidance in field techniques and tactics. I would also like to thank Dr. Helen Lang for her time and insightful comments. Her help with the petrology portion of this project has been obliging. Special gratitude must also be extended to Phillips Petroleum Company who kindly funded all costs for the preparation of thin sections, and to Dr. Smosna who was the bridging liaison for the financial contribution, an added bonus which was greatly appreciated by the author. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends who have supported me through this long and arduous journey. My parents have instilled me with independence and determination, and guided me with love and understanding. For this I owe them more than words can tell. My siblings and friends have been my staunchest supporters, and I only wish I can help them as much as they’ve helped me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES vi INTRODUCTION 1 Geological Setting 1 Area of Study 11 Purpose of Study 11 Methodology 13 DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS 15 Delta Plain 15 Meandering Channel Facies 28 Distributary Channel Facies 38 Crevasse-Splay Facies 42 Interdistributary Swamp 45 Interdistributary Bay Facies 47 Delta Front 51 Beach-Bar 53 Lagoon 58 SEDIMENTARY PETROLOGY 64 Petrography 64 Quartz 64 Feldspars 69 Lithic Fragments 69 Micas 71 Iron Minerals 74 Heavy Minerals 76 Calcite and Fossils 76 Matrix and Cement 77 Petrologic Interpretation 79 Meandering Channel Facies 80 Distributary Channel Facies 82 Crevasse-Splay Facies 87 Beach-Bar Facies 87 Lagoon Facies 91 Interdistributary Bay Facies 91 Summary of Petrologic Analysis 94 v CONCLUSIONS 103 REFERENCES 106 APPENDIX A 110 Measured Sections at Sherwood Lake APPENDIX B 121 Point-Count Data vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Isopach map of the Price Formation in West Virginia. 5 Figure 2 Stratigraphic cross section from Bluefield to Sidling Hill. 6 Figure 3 Chronostratigraphic chart for the Price Formation. 9 Figure 4 Location map of Greenbrier County 12 Figure 5 Location map of Sherwood Lake outcrops 12 Figure 6 Stratigraphic Symbols used in stratigraphic columns. 16 Figure 7 Outcrop 1 stratigraphic column 17 Figure 8 Outcrop 2 stratigraphic column 18 Figure 9 Outcrop 3 stratigraphic column 19 Figure 10A Outcrop 4 stratigraphic column 20 Figure 10B Continuation of outcrop 4 stratigraphic column. 21 Figure 10C Continuation of outcrop 4 stratigraphic column. 22 Figure 11A Outcrop 5 stratigraphic column 23 Figure 11B Continuation of outcrop 5 stratigraphic column. 24 Figure 12 Outcrop 6 stratigraphic column 25 Figure 13 Composite stratigraphic column for all 6 outcrops 26 Figure 14 3-D model of depositional environments present at Sherwood Lake. 27 vii Figure 15 Stratigraphic column typically found in lower- delta-plain deposits. 29 Figure 16 Photographs of outcrop 6. 30 Figure 17 Photographs of large-scale cross-beds present in fluvial sandstones. 31 Figure 18 Photographs of fluvial sandstones displaying scour-and-fill structure. 32 Figure 19 Close-up photograph of scour-and-fill structure present at outcrop 6. 33 Figure 20 Typical fining-upward sequence of meandering stream deposits. 35 Figure 21a. Lateral accretion cross-bedding in small fluvial channel bodies. 37 Figure 21b. Model for fluvial deposition yielding mult- story sandbodies. 37 Figure 22 Photographs of upper distributary channels present at outcrop 5. 39 Figure 23 Typical sequence present in distributary channel facies. 41 Figure 24 Photographs of large-scale trough cross- beds present in upper distributary channel facies. 43 Figure 25 Photographs of large-scale planar cross- beds present in the lower-distributary channel facies. 43 Figure 26 Photographs of the crevasse-splay faices 44 Figure 27 Examples of crevasse-splay deposits found at Sherwood Lake 46 Figure 28 Photographs of the coal deposits present at outcrop 5. 48 Figure 29 Photographs of the interdistributary bay facies. 49 viii Figure 30 Typical stratigraphic column of bay-fill succession. 52 Figure 31 Photographs of Unit 24- Transgressive lag deposit. 54 Figure 32 Stratigraphic cross-section of Price Formation from Bluefield to Crystal Springs, PA. 55 Figure 33 Typical shoreline sequence. 57 Figure 34 Photographs of Unit 26- Shoreface deposits. 59 Figure 35 Photograph of Unit 27- foreshore deposits. 60 Figure 36 Photographs of lagoonal deposits 61 Figure 37 Stratigraphic column for the lagoonal facies 63 Figure 38 QFL diagram for all 57 thin-section samples 65 Figure 39 SPS diagram for all 57 thin-section samples 65 Figure 40 Petrographic photo plate: A. and B. Quartz-rich sample, C. and D. sublitharenite. 66 Figure 41 Petrographic photo plate: A. and B. Lithic-rich sample, C. Undulose quartz, D. Polycrystalline quartz. 67 Figure 42 Petrographic photo plate: A. Chert, B. Plagioclase feldspar, C. Microcline feldspar. 70 Figure 43 Petrographic photo plate: A. and B. Phyllite grain, C. and D. abundant rock fragments with phyllite dominant. 72 Figure 44 Petrographic photo plate: A. and B. Schist rock fragment, C. and D. deformed muscovite grain. 73 Figure 45 Petrographic photo plate: A. abundant hematite, B. siderite, C. Gastropod and calcite crystals D. matrix 75 ix Figure 46 Petrographic photo plate: A. and B. Pseudo- matrix. 78 Figure 47 QFL diagram for fluvial facies. 81 Figure 48 SPS diagram for fluvial facies. 81 Figure 49 QFL diagram for upper distributary channel facies. 83 Figure 50 SPS diagram for upper distributary channel facies. 83 Figure 51 QFL diagram for lower distributary channel facies. 86 Figure 52 SPS diagram for lower distributary channel facies. 86 Figure 53 QFL diagram for crevasse-splay facies 88 Figure 54 SPS diagram for crevasse-splay facies 88 Figure 55 QFL diagram for beach-bar facies 89 Figure 56 SPS diagram for beach-bar facies 89 Figure 57 QFL diagram for lagoon facies 92 Figure 58 SPS diagram for lagoon facies 92 Figure 59 QFL diagram for interdistributary bay facies. 93 Figure 60 SPS diagram for interdistributary bay facies. 93 Figure 61 SPS diagram for mean of all facies 96 Figure 62 Ratio of total metamorphic rock fragments relative to total quartz for all facies 98 Figure 63 Ratio of total shale rock fragments relative to total quartz for all facies 98 1 INTRODUCTION The Price Formation consists of interbedded shale, siltstone and sandstone and is exposed throughout much of West Virginia and southwest Virginia.
Recommended publications
  • The Carboniferous Bowland Shale Gas Study: Geology and Resource Estimation
    THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology and resource estimation i © DECC 2013 THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION Disclaimer This report is for information only. It does not constitute legal, technical or professional advice. The Department of Energy and Climate Change does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may be sustained as a result of reliance upon the information contained in this report. All material is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source, but should not be included in any commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Department of Energy and Climate Change. Suggested citation: Andrews, I.J. 2013. The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology and resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to: Toni Harvey Senior Geoscientist - UK Onshore Email: [email protected] ii © DECC 2013 THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION Foreword This report has been produced under contract by the British Geological Survey (BGS). It is based on a recent analysis, together with published data and interpretations. Additional information is available at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) website. https://www.gov.uk/oil-and-gas-onshore-exploration-and-production. This includes licensing regulations, maps, monthly production figures, basic well data and where to view and purchase data.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of and Climatic Indicators in the Westphalian a New
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 7:47 p.m. Atlantic Geology Geology of and climatic indicators in the Westphalian A New Glasgow formation, Nova Scotia, Canada: implications for the genesis of coal and of sandstone-hosted lead deposits F. W. Chandler Volume 34, Number 1, Spring 1998 Article abstract By the Late Carboniferous, Late Paleozoic northward drift of the continent URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/ageo34_1art03 Laurentia had carried Nova Scotia from the southern dry climate belt into the equatorial rainy belt. Carboniferous amalgamation of Laurentia with the See table of contents southern continent Gondwana enclosed the area within the new supercontinent Pangea, imposing a gradually drying seasonal tropical climate. Disagreement exists on whether the early Pennsylvanian climate of the Publisher(s) Euramerican coal province was everwet or seasonal. Abundant paleopedological evidence, including calcrete-bearing vertisols, shows that Atlantic Geoscience Society during formation of Westphalian C to Stephanian coals in Nova Scotia, the climate was tropical and seasonal with a pronounced dry season, but ISSN interpretation of Westphalian A-B coal-bearing sequences lacks this form of evidence. Development of calcrete-bearing vertisols in alluvial fan deposits of 0843-5561 (print) the Westphalian A New Glasgow formation indicate that a tropical climate with 1718-7885 (digital) a pronounced dry season was already in force by early Westphalian time. During the dry season, the coal swamps of the early Westphalian Joggins and Explore this journal Springhill Mines formations were fed by groundwater from coeval alluvial fan deposits of the Polly Brook Formation at the basin margin. Sedimento-logical evidence indicates that, similarly, groundwater flowed northward from the toe Cite this article of the New Glasgow alluvial fan, but correlative palustrine sediments have not been found on land in the New Glasgow area.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 VITA STEVEN GEORGE DRIESE Personal
    VITA STEVEN GEORGE DRIESE Personal - Home Address: 330 Austin Ave., Apt. #322 Born: 9/21/56, Chicago, IL Waco, TX 767 01 Marital: Married, 3 grown children Cell: (254) 640-1832 Office: (254) 710-2194 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (254) 710-2673 Internet: http://www.baylor.edu/Geology/ ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2389-6391 Education - 1974-1977 Southern Illinois University, B.S. Geology 1977 (summer) Southern Illinois University Field Camp 1977-1979 University of Wisconsin-Madison, M.S. Geology 1979-1982 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Ph.D. Geology Professional Affiliations - Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM); Secretary-Treasurer (1994-1996) and President (2009-2010): elected an Honorary Member in 2015 International Association of Sedimentologists (IAS) Geological Society of America (GSA; elected a Fellow in 1998) American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS; elected a Fellow in 2012) Geochemical Society Sigma Xi, the Scientific Society Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) National Association of Geoscience Teachers (NAGT) University of Tennessee-Knoxville (adjunct in Earth & Planetary Sciences) Professional Experience - 1975 (summer) Exploration Geologist, Amoco Production Company, Texas Gulf Coast Exploration 1976-1977 Laboratory and Field Assistant, Southern Illinois University, Acid mine drainage research 1977 (summer) Field Geologist (GS-5), U.S. Geological Survey, and mineral resources appraisal program 1977-1980 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Wisconsin-Madison, sedimentology, introductory geology
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Poster
    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STACKED SHALE-GAS RESERVOIRS ACROSS NORTHERN AND NORTH-CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA ABSTRACT Jessica Pierson Moore1, Susan E. Pool1, Philip A. Dinterman1, J. Eric Lewis1, Ray Boswell2 Three shale-gas units underlying northern and north-central West Virginia create opportunity for one horizontal well pad to produce from multiple zones. The Upper Ordovician Utica/Point Pleasant, Middle Devonian Marcellus, and Upper Devonian Burket/Geneseo 1 West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey, 2 U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory construction of fairway maps for each play. Current drilling activity focuses on the Marcellus, with more than 1,000 horizontal completions reported through mid-2015. Across northern West Virginia, the Marcellus is 40 to 60 ft. thick with a depth range between 5,000 and 8,000 ft. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) REGIONAL GEOLOGY is generally 10% or greater. Quartz content is relatively high (~60%) and clay content is low (~30%). Reservoir pressure estimates STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION FROM HARRISON CO., OHIO TO HARDY CO., WEST VIRGINIA range from 0.3 to 0.7 psi/ft and generally increase to the north. Volumetric assessment of the Marcellus in this area yields preliminary NW SE 81° 80° 79° 78° 1 2 3 4 5 original gas-in-place estimates of 9 to 24 Bcf/mi2. OH WV WV WV WV Pennsylvania Figure 2.—Location of seismic sections, wells, and major basement Harrison Co. Marshall Co. Marion Co. Preston Co. Hardy Co. 34-067-20103 47-051-00539 47-049-00244 47-077-00119 47-031-00021 UTICA SHALE PLAY GR 41 miles GR 36 miles GR 27 miles GR 32 miles GR Westmoreland The Burket /Geneseo interval is approximately 15 to 40 ft thick across the fairway.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinantian Carbonate Development and Related Prospectivity of the Onshore Northern Netherlands
    Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Author: Nynke Hoornveld Supervisors: Bastiaan Jaarsma, EBN Utrecht Prof. Dr. Jan de Jager, VU University Amsterdam Master Thesis: Solid Earth, (450199 and 450149) 39 ECTS. VU University Amsterdam 01-06-2013 Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Contents Contents……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………..3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….……4 Geological History of the Netherlands relating to Dinantian development…………………………..……………..7 Tectonic history…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Stratigraphy of the Carboniferous…………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands……………………………………………………………….………23 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..26 Seismic interpretation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…27 Time-depth conversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...35 Well correlation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…38 Carbonate production, precipitation and geometries, with a focus on the Dinantian……….………40 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..57 Well information, evaluation and reservoir development………………………………………………………..58 Geometry of the Dinantian carbonate build-ups in the Dutch Northern onshore…………..……….75 The geological history
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Coal-Bed Gas Total Petroleum System
    U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1272 Assessment of Appalachian Basin Oil and Gas Resources: Carboniferous Coal-bed Gas Total Petroleum System Robert C. Milici U.S. Geological Survey 956 National Center Reston, VA 20192 1 Table of Contents Abstract Introduction East Dunkard and West Dunkard Assessment units Introduction: Stratigraphy: Pottsville Formation Allegheny Group Conemaugh Group Monongahela Group Geologic Structure: Coalbed Methane Fields and Pools: Assessment Data: Coal as a source rock for CBM: Gas-In-Place Data Thermal Maturity Generation and Migration Coal as a reservoir for CBM: Porosity and Permeability Coal Bed Distribution Cumulative Coal Thickness Seals: Depth of Burial Water Production Cumulative Production Data: Pocahontas basin and Central Appalachian Shelf Assessment Units Introduction: Stratigraphy: Pocahontas Formation New River Formation Kanawha Formation 2 Lee Formation Norton Formation Gladeville Sandstone Wise Formation Harlan Formation Breathitt Formation Geologic Structure: Coalbed Methane Fields: Coal as a Source Rock for CBM Gas-in-Place Data Thermal Maturity Generation and Migration Coal as a Reservoir for CBM: Porosity and Permeability Coal Bed Distribution Cumulative Coal Thickness Seals: Depth of Burial Water Production Cumulative Production Data: Assessment Results: Appalachian Anthracite and Semi-Anthracite Assessment Unit: Pennsylvania Anthracite Introduction: Stratigraphy: Pottsville Formation Llewellyn Formation Geologic Structure: Coal as a Source Rock for CBM: Gas-In-Place-Data Thermal
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Sharon E
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Center for Applied Energy Research Publications 11-1990 Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Sharon E. Lewis Montana Tech James C. Hower University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub Part of the Geology Commons Repository Citation Lewis, Sharon E. and Hower, James C., "Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data" (1990). Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Publications. 11. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Applied Energy Research at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Notes/Citation Information Published in The Journal of Geology, v. 98, no. 6, p. 927-942. © 1990 by The nivU ersity of Chicago. All rights reserved. The opc yright holder has granted the permission for posting the article here. Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1086/629462 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub/11 IMPLICATIONS OF THERMAL EVENTS ON THRUST EMPLACEMENT SEQUENCE IN THE APPALACHIAN FOLD AND THRUST BELT: SOME NEW VITRINITE REFLECTANCE DATAl SHARON E.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover
    rf Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis- - Concept and Application u.s. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover. Calcic paleo-Vertisol underlying the resistant transgressive marine limestone Little Stone Gap Member of the Hinton Formation (Upper Mississippian) in southwestern West Virginia. This paleosol is indicative of a relatively dry climate when evapotranspira- tion exceeded rainfall for more than 6 months out of the year. The light-gray color at the level of the photograph scale (center) is the result of gleying (bleaching) after burial. A calcified root system, located in the proximity of the scale, branches downward and sug­ gests a well-developed root system for a plant whose stem may have been up to 15 centi­ meters in diameter. Numerous mineralized fossil roots at this level indicate that land plants were very well adapted to seasonally dry conditions in nonwaterlogged environ­ ments by Late Mississippian time. Cross-cutting fractures, known as mukkara structures and caused by seasonal expansion (wet) and contraction (dry), are visible throughout the outcrop beneath the resistant limestone layer except where interrupted or destroyed by paleoroot systems. Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis Concept and Application Edited by C. Blaine Cecil and N. Terence Edgar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2110 A collection of extended abstracts of papers presented at two workshops on the title subject UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • WV Generalized Stratigraphic Column/Chart
    Generalized Stratigraphic Chart for West Virginia Series/ Drillers’ Era System Stage Western WV Eastern WV Terminology CENOZOIC Paleogene Eocene Igneous Intrusives MESOZOIC Jurassic Igneous Intrusives PERMIAN Dunkard Group Carroll, Minshall, Murphy, Moundsville, Upper Monongahela Fm. 1st Cow Run, Little Conemaugh Group Dunkard, Big Dunkard Burning Springs, Middle Allegheny Fm. 2nd Cow Run, Kanawha Fm. Gas Sands, Horseneck (Subsystem) New River Fm. Pottsville PENNSYLVANIAN Lower Pocahontas Fm. Group Salt Sands Bluestone Fm. Pride, Ravencliff, Avis, Princeton Ss. Mauch Chunk Maxton, Little Lime, Upper Hinton Fm. Group Pencil Cave, Blue Monday Bluefield Fm. CARBONIFEROUS Greenbrier Group Big Lime, Keener, Middle Big Injun (Subsystem) Maccrady Fm. (south) MISSISSIPPIAN Lower Big Injun, Squaw, Sunbury Sh. Price Fm. Weir, Coffee (Sunbury) Sh. Berea Ss. Cleveland Sh. Gantz, 50’, 30’, Ohio Sh. Chagrin Sh. Hampshire Group Huron Sh. Gordon Stray, Gordon, Hanover Sh. bed 4th, 5th, Bayard, Java Fm. Pipe Creek Sh. bed Greenland Foreknobs Fm. Elizabeth, Warren, Upper West Falls Fm. Angola Sh. Gap Group Scherr Fm. Speechley, Balltown, Rhinestreet Sh. Bradford, Riley, Cashaqua Sh. Sonyea Fm. Middlesex Sh. Benson, Alexander, Elk, Haverty, Genesee Fm./ West River Sh. Brallier Fm. Geneseo Sh./Burket Sh. Fox, Sycamore Harrell Sh. Harrell Sh. DEVONIAN Tully Ls. Millboro Sh. Hamilton Group Mahantango Fm. Mahantango Fm. Marcellus Sh. Marcellus Sh. Middle Tioga ash beds Tioga ash beds Huntersville Chert Needmore Sh. Onondaga Ls. Oriskany Ss. “Corniferous” Lower (west only) Helderberg Group Bass Islands Fm. Big Mountain Sh. Clifton Forge Ss. Keyser Fm. PALEOZOIC Lower Keyser Mbr. PHANEROZOIC Salina Fm. Tonoloway Fm. Newburg Wills Creek Fm. Upper Bloomsburg Williamsport Fm. Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Stone by Dr John Parker (PDF)
    Winchester Stone by John Parker ©2016 Dr John Parker studied geology at Birmingham and Cambridge universities. He is a Fellow of the Geological Society of London. For over 30 years he worked as an exploration geologist for Shell around the world. He has lived in Winchester since 1987. On retirement he trained to be a Cathedral guide. The Building of Winchester Cathedral – model in the Musée de la Tapisserie, Bayeux 1 Contents Introduction page 3 Geological background 5 Summary of the stratigraphic succession 8 Building in Winchester Romano-British and Anglo-Saxon periods 11 Early medieval period (1066-1350) 12 Later medieval period (1350-1525) 18 16th to 18th century 23 19th to 21st century 24 Principal stone types 28 Chalk, clunch and flint 29 Oolite 30 Quarr 31 Caen 33 Purbeck 34 Beer 35 Upper Greensand 36 Portland 38 Other stones 40 Weldon 40 Chilmark 41 Doulting 41 French limestones 42 Coade Stone 42 Decorative stones, paving and monuments 43 Tournai Marble 43 Ledger stones and paving 44 Alabaster 45 Jerusalem stone 45 Choice of stone 46 Quarries 47 A personal postscript 48 Bibliography and References 50 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Photographs and diagrams are by the author, unless otherwise indicated 2 Introduction Winchester lies in an area virtually devoid of building stone. The city is on the southern edge of the South Downs, a pronounced upland area extending from Salisbury Plain in the west to Beachy Head in the east (Figs. 1 & 2). The bedrock of the Downs is the Upper Cretaceous Chalk (Fig. 3), a soft friable limestone unsuited for major building work, despite forming impressive cliffs along the Sussex coast to the east of Brighton.
    [Show full text]