DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Oregon Fire Museum 102/104 Elm Street La Grande, Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Oregon Fire Museum 102/104 Elm Street La Grande, Oregon Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Eastern Oregon Fire Museum 102/104 Elm Street La Grande, Oregon Prepared for Oregon DEQ January 23, 2015 15827‐00/Task 2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Eastern Oregon Fire Museum 102/104 Elm Street La Grande, Oregon Prepared for Oregon DEQ January 23, 2015 15827‐00/Task 2 Prepared by Hart Crowser, Inc. Expires: 12/31/2015 Anthony B. Chavez, RG Richard D. Ernst, RG Task Order Manager Program Manager 8910 SW Gemini Drive Beaverton, OR 97008-7123 Fax 503.620.6918 Tel 503.620.7284 Contents 1.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 1.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions 1 1.2 Historical RECs 1 1.3 Controlled RECs 2 1.4 De Minimis Conditions 2 1.5 Other Conditions: Regulated Building Materials 4 2.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 Purpose and Scope 4 2.2 Assumptions, Limitations, and Exceptions 5 2.3 Special Terms and Conditions 5 2.4 User Reliance 5 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 3.1 Location and Vicinity General Characteristics 5 3.2 Current Use and Property Description 6 3.3 Adjoining Property Use and Description 6 4.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION 6 4.1 Recorded Instruments on Property 6 4.2 Actual and Specialized Knowledge 7 4.3 Purchase Price 7 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 7 5.1 Regulatory Records 7 5.2 Physical Setting Sources 11 5.3 Historical Information 12 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 16 6.1 Subject Property 17 6.2 Adjoining and Surrounding Properties 18 7.0 INTERVIEWS 18 8.0 PHASE I ESA DATA GAP ANALYSIS 18 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 18 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT 19 15827‐00/Task2 January 23, 2015 ii | Contents 11.0 REFERENCES 19 FIGURES 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Map APPENDIX A Site Reconnaissance Photographs APPENDIX B Supporting Documentation APPENDIX C EDR Reports APPENDIX D Resumes 15827‐00/Task2 January 23, 2015 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Eastern Oregon Fire Museum 102/104 Elm Street La Grande, Oregon 1.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This report presents the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the Eastern Oregon Fire Museum located at 102/104 Elm Street in La Grande, Oregon (Property). This Phase I ESA was prepared by Hart Crowser to comply with the requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312 (All Appropriate Inquiries) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527‐13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The Property is being assessed as part of a Community‐Wide Assessment Grant from the Environmental Protection Agency to the Northeast Oregon Economic Development District (NEOEDD). A summary of our findings is presented below. Based on a review of reasonably ascertainable information, potential environmental concerns were classified as recognized environmental conditions (RECs), historical RECs, controlled RECs, de minimis conditions, or an environmentally related condition on the Property that is beyond the scope required by ASTM E 1527‐13. Please refer to the main text of the report for additional discussion. 1.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions RECs are defined in ASTM E 1527‐13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” We did not identify any RECs for the Property. 1.2 Historical RECs Historical RECs are defined in ASTM E 1527‐13 as “a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls.” The following historical RECs were identified. 1.2.1 Onsite Historical Fuel Pump and Tank The database review identified an underground storage tank (UST) on the Property. According to an interview with Mr. Bruce Weimer with the City of La Grande, a fuel pump and UST were present on the Property for fueling fire trucks. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) records indicate a 500‐gallon UST and fuel pump were installed in April 1970 and later removed in August 1994. The UST reportedly contained gasoline. A soil sample collected below the UST contained no detectable 15827‐00/Task2 January 23, 2015 2 | Eastern Oregon Fire Museum concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). A vent pipe likely associated with the UST was observed near the parking area in the back of the building. Recommendation. The removed fuel pump and UST are considered a Historical REC. As documentation was available regarding the UST’s removal and lack of TPH concentrations, no further investigation related to the UST is necessary. 1.2.2 Nearby Historical Leaking Underground Storage Tank A site located northwest and upgradient of the Property at 102 Depot Street is listed on the DEQ Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database for a release from a heating oil UST reported in September 2012. The LUST file was closed for the site in November 2012. Recommendation. Because the 102 Depot Street property has been closed by the DEQ and the site is located a block away, no further investigation related to this release is necessary. 1.3 Controlled RECs Controlled RECs are defined in ASTM E1527‐13 as “a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk‐based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls).” No controlled RECs were identified for the Property. Institutional controls are in place at the nearby Union Pacific Rail Road (UPRR) Rail Yard Site approximately 200 feet northeast of the Property (see also Section 1.4.2 below). 1.4 De Minimis Conditions De minimis conditions are defined in ASTM E1527‐13 as “a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” The following were identified as de minimis conditions for the Property. 1.4.1 Onsite Historical Paint Shop According to 1931 and 1949 Sanborn maps a paint shop was present on or near the northwest corner of the Property adjacent to Washington Avenue. The paint shop was not visible on the next available Sanborn map from 1960. Environmental concerns associated with painting include the use of petroleum‐based volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in paints and for cleaning of painting equipment. Illicit disposal or incidental releases of paints or solvents may lead to contamination. Recommendation. There is no documentation or indications of illicit disposal. The paint shop was demolished and later the building on the Property was constructed over this area. Because of the time 15827‐00/Task2 January 23, 2015 Eastern Oregon Fire Museum | 3 since its last use (over 50 years ago) and the potential for degradation of any releases since that time, we have classified the paint shop as a de minimis condition. 1.4.2 Nearby UPRR Diesel Soil and Groundwater Contamination Soil and groundwater contamination is present approximately 200 feet northeast and cross‐gradient of the Property. Long historical use of the UPRR Rail Yard, included maintenance and refueling of diesel‐ fueled locomotives. Free product was initially discovered on the groundwater table below the site in 1981. Between 1982 and 1989, approximately 44,000 gallons of diesel was recovered from the groundwater table. Maps of the extent of contamination also indicate the Property is outside the zone of contamination. An abandoned groundwater monitoring well associated with the investigation of the UPRR Rail Yard Site is located on the Property. Groundwater quality data collected from the monitoring well in 2001 indicate contamination associated with rail yard does not extend onto the Property. Recommendation. Due to the lack of detectable UPRR Rail Yard Site contaminants in the former onsite monitoring well, the site does not pose an environmental threat to the Property. 1.4.3 Nearby Leaking Underground Storage Tank The Post Office located west‐northwest and upgradient of the Property at 1204 Washington Avenue is listed on the DEQ Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. The file is listed as active in the LUST database due to a release from a heating oil tank discovered during tank decommissioning in 1991. The release was reportedly limited to soil and caused from tank overfilling. Recommendation. Due to the nature of the contamination (heating oil), the affected media (soil only), and the distance to the Property, the 1204 Washington Avenue site is not likely to have impacted the Property and additional investigation with regards to this release is not warranted. 1.4.4 Nearby Historical Dry Cleaner The Odorless Dry Cleaner was located approximately 600 feet northwest and upgradient of the Property. Based on DEQ’s listing for this site, the dry cleaner was operational for almost 50 years. Reportedly, the dry cleaner only used petroleum‐based solvents. No other information was identified that the site has contamination associated with the historical dry cleaner. Recommendation. We identified this dry cleaner as a de minimis condition due to its upgradient location and long‐term presence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kite-Shaped Track.”
    City of San Bernardino Historical and Pioneer Society P.O. Box 875, San Bernardino, CA 92402 LIBRARY NEWS OCTOBER 2011 By Richard D. Thompson, Librarian Following is the second article by Mark Landis, freelance writer for the San Bernardino Sun. As in the case of last month’s story, this feature has pictures he submitted to the Sun that did not make it into the newspaper. “No Scene Twice Seen” On The Santa Fe Railroad’s Splendid “Kite-Shaped Track” Excursion By Mark Landis, Correspondent N the days of the great westward migration of the late 1800’s, California was promoted with splendid images and accounts that frequently exaggerated the truth. Southern California’s mild climate and diverse landscapes were regularly touted as a virtual paradise by land developers, business promoters, and especially the railroads. The railroads were the main beneficiary of the westward movement since they owned huge tracts of land and provided transportation for the migrants and their new products. In 1892, the Santa Fe Railroad began promoting the real beauty and diversity of Southern California with a special tourist route they called “The Kite-Shaped Track.” From the collection of Lee Gustafson Relief map from a Santa Fe brochure showing the route of the Kite-Shaped Track 84 The “Kite” name comes from a figure-eight style horse racing track that was popular during the era. A map of the Kite Track route looks something like an elongated figure-eight, lying horizontally. The small end of the “eight” was at the eastern end of the route known as “the Loop.” The station at San Bernardino was at the crossing of the figure eight and was the beginning and end of “the Loop.” Originally called “The Belt Line,” the Southern California Railway (owned by the Santa Fe) began operating the 166-mile tourist route in January of 1892.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtownla VISION PLAN
    your downtownLA VISION PLAN This is a project for the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Compass Blueprint Program. Compass Blueprint assists Southern California cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region’s goals. Compass Blueprint tools support visioning efforts, infill analyses, economic and policy analyses, and marketing and communication programs. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City’s future use or adaptation of the report. 0CONTENTS 00. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01. WHY IS DOWNTOWN IMPORTANT? 01a. It is the birthplace of Los Angeles 01b. All roads lead to Downtown 01c. It is the civic, cultural, and commercial heart of Los Angeles 02. WHAT HAS SHAPED DOWNTOWN? 02a. Significant milestones in Downtown’s development 02b. From pueblo to urban core 03. DOWNTOWN TODAY 03a. Recent development trends 03b. Public infrastructure initiatives 04.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Kerckoff Building and Annex_________________________________________ other names/site number Santa Fe Building and Annex_________________________________ 2. Location____ , street & number 558-64 S. Main Street _____________________NA D not for publication city or town Los Angeles_____________________________f\ MAPI vicinity state California________ code CA county Los Angeles code ,#39 zip code 90013 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x] nomination G request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property (3 meets G does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodist Episcopal General Conference Guide Book for Session
    F 869 ETMODisT Episcopal .L8 M4 Copy 1 NEKAL Conference DELEGATES AHENTION! Take the Trolley Trips from Los Angeles to Mt* Lowe San Gabriel Mission Baldwin^s Ranch Long Bsach Pasadena Ostrich Farm Whittier The quickest and most economical way to see Southern California. Via Pacific Electric Railway Depot, Center of City, Sixth and Main Sts. Los Angeles, Cal.fornia. Write Passenper Department for Literature F?XVI L-V\/XX>K BISHOPS OF THK Methodist Episcopal Church THOMAS BOWMAN STEPHEN M. MERRILL EDWARD G. ANDREWS HENRY W. WARREN CYRUS D. FOSS JOHN M. WALDEN WILLARD F. MALLALIEU CHARLES H. FOWLER JOHN H. VINCENT JAMES N. FITZGERALD ISAAC W. JOYCE DANIEL A. GOODSELL CHARLES C. McCABE EARL CRANSTON DAVID H. MOORE JOHN W. HAMILTON Missionary Bishops JAMES M. THOBURN, India JOSEPH C. HARTZELL Africa FRANK W. WARJSTE, Southern Asia c Westminster Hotel Cor. Fourth and Main Sts. Headquarters General Conference Commission and Hotel Coiumittee. Imperial Lands, San Diego County, Cal. The Virgin Soil Harvesting Wheat in June Alfalfa Six Months from Seeding that was Sown in Febmary ALFALFA LAND ALFALFA For**-iO. !#«.>, *30anacre in the Delta of the Great Colorado River in the Eastern part of San Diego County, California, lies the richest land in the United States under the greatest irrigation system in America. It was a vast so called "Desert'" three years ago. Now there are Railroads, School-houses, Towns and over 8000 inhabitants; over 100,000 acres under cultivation. The land is cheap and the opjwrtunities great for the practical farmer or investor. Write for Circulars J. M.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancún Et La Riviera Maya
    Go lfe d CANCÚN u Mexique Mérida Campeche RIVIERA MAYA México M E Mer des Caraïbes X I Cancún et Q U E BELIZE OC GUATEMALA HONDURAS ÉAN PACIFIQUE la Riviera Maya Farniente, plein air, archéologie et écotourisme! Vivez à fond Cancún et sa trépidante zone hôtelière. Relaxez dans la douce Isla Mujeres. Découvrez la magnifi que Riviera Maya et ses nombreux attraits naturels. Passez un séjour branché dans l’étonnante ville de Playa del Carmen. Visitez les exceptionnels sites archéologiques de Tulum, Cobá et Chichén Itzá. Gardez des souvenirs colorés de vos excursions de plongée autour de Cozumel. Bref, profi tez au mieux de vos vacances dans ce coin du Mexique unique au monde grâce au seul guide aussi complet sur la région: le guide Ulysse Cancún et la Riviera Maya. Vous trouverez dans ce guide • La sélection la plus complète d’hôtels et de restaurants pour toutes les bourses, avec les «coups de cœur Ulysse» pour les établissements qui se distinguent. Sans oublier un vaste choix de sorties et de bou- tiques. • Un contenu culturel étoffé, une description de tous les attraits, cotés selon un système d’étoiles, ainsi qu’une section thématique en début d’ouvrage pour vous aider à personnaliser votre séjour. • Tout sur les plus belles plages, les activités de plein air et les meilleurs sites de plongée. Cancún et la Riviera Maya • De nombreuses cartes détaillées, ainsi qu’une foule de renseigne- ments pratiques pour vous aider à voyager en toute liberté. ISBN: 978-289464-870-4 24,95 $ www.guidesulysse.com Le plaisir de mieux voyager 19,99 € TTC en
    [Show full text]
  • (Dtla 2040) Chinatown
    DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN (DTLA 2040) CHINATOWN Introduction Source: Shutterstock This package of information serves as a guide on how the DTLA 2040 Plan recognizes the unique history and culture of Chinatown. The Downtown Plan aims to support equitable growth into the future by adopting new policies, establishing new zoning rules, and outlining Design Best Practices for new buildings in the neighborhood. This package includes the following: The Policy Document Readers Guide 1. The Policy Document Readers Guide • The General Plan Land Use map shows broad designations of uses and scales. The General Plan Designation doesn’t regulate height or uses on particular properties, but sets a broad range of what should be allowed. 2. Draft Zoning Summary • Zoning regulates the specific size of buildings and what activities are allowed within them. Zoning is the main tool the City uses to implement the vision of the community. The zoning code is a technical document used by city staff to review building plans. This packet includes a summary of the draft zoning and creates a link between the community vision and the draft zoning regulations. The draft zoning code can be found on the Plan website (www.planning4la.org/dtla2040) 3. Chinatown Design Best Practice Summary • The Design Best Practice document outlines ideas on how new development can contribute to the historic, cultural legacy of Chinatown. The document includes topics such as architectural details, access to open space, and precedent studies. The Downtown Plan materials can be found at: www.planning4la.org/dtla2040#draft-plan Page - 1 POLICY DOCUMENT 1. READERS GUIDE Introduction The Policy Document outlines a vision for the neighborhood and outlines specific ideas Chinatown community members shared during outreach events.
    [Show full text]
  • Ithe Boys' Store
    6, iqo6. LOS ANGELES HERALD: SATURDAY MORNING, JANUARY 3 When g; MAILBOX THEFTS STILL SERIOUS WOMAN WANDERS Dr. Graves' £ / N Tooth Powder The BAFFLE OFFICERS IN THE BALTIC FROM HER HOME is used twicc-a-day you willhave Boys' Store | white teeth, hard glints,^ clean I mouth, pure breath, jjootl diges- j£ That Always Gives Satisfaction J. 5; (OnMntir.lfrom Patr On«.) CHURCH IS tion, r^W GIRL DISCOVERS AN OPEN troops \rorkmen, nlso MRS. ANNIE B. good health. Listen to your fired on the nnd dentist's advi.ic. lie knows «JJ It's a satisfactory place to buy boys' apparel because "» at the Cetnttefy of the Transflßurntlon, best. stocks so complete and prices reasonable. When *Aw^Jm RECEPTACLE where the majority of the victims were DEMENTED In Imnilj- nirtnt mm or bottle*. 3.V-. «* are Jy^vH •*£ burled. ;* you come here for a certain article you're sure to find fftMyfJ'iPVi I Two wings of tho Sorl.ll Democratic Dr.Graves* ToothPowder Co. a can any- "» party have joined, thn it and invariably betcr grade than you find My^%Shjt\ now workmen's Patient Found Wandering About the 'JZ even "*'2* Crooks Believed to Be Working In otfranlxntlnn In dorlariiifr that they will "JJ where else for the same money. We arc better £TIW I boycott the election!! to tho national Streets Taken Hospital, Where CITY PAINTED HER COAT RED equipped now than we were in the old store and every 'St^i "^ Disguise of Carrier*—Man Re- assembly. The Social Democrats hnve to *2 wUmf IfiwM adopted a series of resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Ken Pratt, Deputy Executive Officer, Union Station Property Management
    Master Commercial Developer Industry Forum Agenda 9:00 am Welcome Phil Washington, Metro CEO Metro Board Director Solis 9:15 am Introductions and Overview of the Event Jenna Hornstock, Executive Officer, Transit Oriented Communities 9:20 am Historic Los Angeles Union Station Ken Pratt, Deputy Executive Officer, Union Station Property Management 9:40 am Link US Project Overview Jeanet Owens, Senior Executive Officer, Program Management 10:00 am LAUS – The Opportunity Jenna Hornstock, Executive Officer, Transit Oriented Communities 10:20 am Question and Answer Panel 11:30 am Meet the Developers Mixer Please make sure to pre-register and then visit the sign-in booth Goals of Industry Forum • Provide an overview of the opportunity • Seek feedback from potential development teams on: • The commercial and retail development opportunity at LAUS • The overall procurement process • Project scope and • Project delivery approach • Offer networking opportunities for teams to join with qualified, Metro- certified SBEs Union Station Guiding Principles Transit Optimization • Plan for and accommodate current and future needs • Create large multi-modal passenger concourse Destination • Reinvigorate historic station and courtyards • Provide uses that support transit functions Connectivity • Reinforce neighborhood connections • Create clear pedestrian and bicycle routes through the site Union Station – Then and Now Los Angeles Union Station: Past, Present & Future • A Glimpse into the Past • Revitalizing History • Capital Projects • New Tenants • Events and Amenities • Looking to the Future • Los Angeles Union Station is the main railway station in Los Angeles and the largest railroad passenger terminal in the Western United States. • It opened in May 1939 as the Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal, replacing La Grande Station and Central Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3. Cultural Resources
    Division 20 Portal Widening/Turnback Facility Project Draft EIR 3.3 Cultural Resources 3.3. CULTURAL RESOURCES This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources present within the Project Site, evaluates the potential project-related impacts on those resources, and provides mitigation measures, as applicable. The information provided herein is based on the results and recommendations contained in Appendix C Historic Resources Technical Memoranda, which includes the Historic Resources Technical Memorandum (C.1), Archaeological Resources Technical Memorandum (C.2), and Paleontological Resources Technical Memorandum (C.3). These appendix files include extensive sourcing and referencing of information used in this section. 3.3.1. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Cultural and paleontological resources fall within the jurisdiction of several levels of government. The State and local jurisdictions provide the framework for the identification, documentation, and protection of such resources. CEQA, Section 5024 of the PRC, the City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Ordinance (Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 22.130), Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.9 of the PRC are the primary laws that govern and affect the preservation of cultural resources of national, State, regional, and local significance. CEQA and Sections 5097.5 and 30244 of the PRC are the primary laws that govern the preservation of paleontological resources at the State level. 3.3.1.1. Federal National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) The National Park Service's NRHP is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect America's historic and archeological resources. To determine whether an undertaking could affect NRHP-listed or - eligible properties, cultural resources (including archaeological, historical, and architectural properties) must be inventoried and evaluated for listing in the NRHP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Life of Anna Blanc
    O SECRET LIFE & ANNA BLANC Secret Life of Anna Blanc.indd 1 8/26/15 9:01 AM Secret Life of Anna Blanc.indd 2 8/26/15 9:01 AM O SECRET LIFE & ANNA BLANC JENNIFER KINCHELOE Secret Life of Anna Blanc.indd 3 8/26/15 9:01 AM Published 2015 by Seventh Street Books®, an imprint of Prometheus Books e Secret Life of Anna Blanc. Copyright © 2015 by Jennifer Kincheloe. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, digital, electronic, mechanical, photocopy ing, re cord ing, or otherwise, or conveyed via the Internet or a website without prior written permission of the publisher, ex cept in the case of brief quotations em bodied in critical articles and reviews. Cover design by Nicole Sommer-Lecht Cover image © David et Myrtille / Trevillion Images is is a work of ction. Characters, organizations, products, locales, and events por- trayed in this novel either are products of my imagination or are used ctitiously. I took some liberties for the sake of the story. Some books and songs were released a year or two later than 1907, when the novel takes place. For example, the book e Circular Staircase and the song Harvest Moon were not published until 1908. Emma Summers and the Boyle Heights Rape Fiend were real people, but the details of their lives have been changed for the sake of this story. e character of Anna Blanc bears some resemblance to Fanny Bixby, one of California’s richest young women, who became a police matron in Long Beach in 1907.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Washington State Ambient Air Monitoring Network Assessment
    2010 Washington State Ambient Air Monitoring Network Assessment Washington State Department of Ecology Air Quality Program July 1, 2010 Publication no. 10‐02‐016 Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/1002016.pdf . For more information contact: Air Quality Program PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504‐7600 Phone: (360) 407‐6800 Washington State Department of Ecology ‐ www.ecy.wa.gov Headquarters, Olympia (360) 407‐6000 Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue (425) 649‐7000 Southwest Regional Office, Olympia (360) 407‐6300 Central Regional Office, Yakima (509) 575‐2490 Eastern Regional Office, Spokane (509) 329‐3400 To ask about the availability of this document in a format for the visually impaired, call the Air Quality Program at (360) 407‐6800. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 1‐877‐833‐6341. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Ecology Policy Goal and Objectives ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Eastern Oregon Station Report (2019)
    Central & Eastern Oregon Station Report 2019 Images that are not ODOT property are given credit to their owners within the caption. All photos that do not have a listed owner are property of ODOT. All written information is a product of field work or the accredited sources listed in the bibliography. Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division 555 13th Street NE, Suite 3 Salem, OR 97301 Researched and written by Brandon Geiger. Edited by Robert Melbo. Cover Photos: Top — Amtrak Pioneer at The Dalles’ 2nd Street Station (Dan Haneckow) Bottom Left — Ontario OSL Depot Bottom Right — Cascade Locks Station Site Central & Eastern Oregon Station Report ODOT Rail & Public Transit Division September 2019 The contents of this report were researched a collected between July and September of 2019. All of the information provided within con- tent of the report is a product of site visits or secondary source material as referenced in the bibliography. The ODOT Rail Division is the sole producer of this document. Thank you to the following parties for their contributions: Baker County Mt. Hood Railroad Company Pacific Northwest Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society Troutdale Historical Society Umatilla County Historical Society This page left intentionally blank. Executive Summary……………………………………………………… 1 Background……………………………………………………………... 1 Scope……………………………………………………………………. 1 Context…………………………………………………………………. 2 Findings of the Report………………………………………………….. 4 Recommendations………………………………………………………. 5 The Way Forward……………………………………………………...... 6 Abbreviations……………………………………………………………. 6 Chapter One: Purpose & Methodology…………………………………. 7 Purpose of the Report…………………………………………………... 7 Report Methodology & Scope…………………………………………... 7 Chapter Two: Route Background……………………………………….. 11 Route Description……………………………………………………...... 11 History of Passenger Rail………………………………………………... 13 Pioneer’s Use of Waiting Shelters…………………………………………. 16 Amtrak Pioneer Reinstatement…………………………………………… 17 Chapter Three: Passenger Rail Service Options……………………….
    [Show full text]