Melodic Contour Typology Author(s): Charles R. Adams Source: Ethnomusicology, Vol. 20, No. 2 (May, 1976), pp. 179-215 Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of Society for Ethnomusicology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/851015 . Accessed: 10/09/2013 11:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. University of Illinois Press and Society for Ethnomusicology are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethnomusicology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 164.41.4.26 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:13:40 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MELODIC CONTOUR TYPOLOGY1 Charles R. Adams INTRODUCTION he concept of melodic contour (shape, configuration,outline) is fre- T quentlyencountered, but its precisemeaning and significancein musical analysisis elusive.The literatureevidences varied concerns with the natureand typology of melodiccontour, from simple descriptive comments, to the use of contourreplication in jazz improvization(Coker 1964:55-56), to the designof programsfor computer assisted descriptionsof melodic contour (Brown 1968). Few definitivestudies of the concept, or its systematicapplication, however,are to be found. Melodic analyses often include some descriptionand discussionof melodic contours (e.g., Densmore 1918; Herzog 1928; McAllester1949; Merriam1967; Roberts 1933), but this practice is not consistent and consensus on proceduresis relatively low.