Municipality Swartland East Area Plan and Riebeek Kasteel WARDS 3 and 12

AREA PLAN FOR 2021/2022 – MAY 2021 Annexure 5 of the Integrated Development Plan for 2017-2022

Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 General 2 1.2 Structure of document 2 1.3 Compilation of the area plans 2 1.4 Annual process followed between August 2019 and May 2020 3 1.5 The IDP and area plans 3 2 DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF THE SWARTLAND MUNICIPAL AREA 4 3 TOWNS IN THE AREA 5 3.1 Riebeek West / Riebeek Kasteel 5 (a) Historical background 5 (b) Development perspective 5 (c) Service backlogs 6 3.2 Town statistics - 2016 6 3.3 Capital budget for the area 9 4 WARD DETAIL 10 4.1 Ward 3 (Riebeek West) 10 (a) Ward 3 description 10 (b) Ward 3 committee information 11 (c) Ward 3 statistics - 2016 12 (d) Ward 3 needs 14 4.2 Ward 12 (Riebeek Kasteel) 15 (a) Ward 12 description 15 (b) Ward 12 committee information 16 (c) Ward 12 statistics - 2016 17 (d) Ward 12 needs 19 ANNEXURE1: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PROPOSALS 21 SWARTLAND STRATEGY OVERVIEW

1 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL Area-based planning is an initiative that complements the IDP process by focusing and zooming in on communities. Communities in this sense are represented by settlements and wards. Because wards are often demarcated in a way that divides areas that in reality function as a unit, Swartland decided to adopt an approach that in the first place focuses on sensible geographical areas, simultaneously considering ward planning so that wards are not neglected. To achieve this, a number of wards are combined for each area plan. The following five planning areas were identified: . North: , and Ruststasie (Wards 1 and 2) . East: Riebeek West, Riebeek Kasteel and Ongegund (Wards 3 and 12) . West: Darling and (Wards 5 and 6) . South: , Chatsworth, Riverlands and (Wards 4 and 7)

. Central: Malmesbury (Wards 8, 9, 10 and 11 and small portions of wards 4, 7 and 12). As such, it is an approach that represents an effort to address integrated development planning at a sub-municipal level. There are therefore five planning areas; each with its own Area Plan document. Four of the five plans represent two wards each, while Malmesbury town represents four wards. The importance of the role of the wards and ward committees is addressed in the second section of each Area Plan. It also contains the community inputs and the results of the public meetings pertaining to those wards.

1.2 STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENT When presenting planning and community participation at local level, information is presented per town and per ward (as mentioned in the previous paragraph). This can be challenging as it interrupts the natural flow from analysis and community participation towards projects. To maintain clarity, however, everything that can be linked to a town was grouped in the town section, and everything linked to a ward approach, is presented in the ward section.

1.3 COMPILATION OF THE AREA PLANS The Municipality compiles the area plans in conjunction with the ward committees. Meetings are held every year with all 12 ward committees to determine their issues and top ten priorities or to reprioritise the priorities if required because of changing circumstances. The main priorities of the relevant wards are identified by the ward committees in respect of the five IDP strategic goals. The priorities identified during the meetings are then captured by the Municipality and returned to the various ward committees to verify the ten main priorities, as stated in the area plan. The area plans are finalized annually by the end of May and approved by council together with the Integrated Development Plan.

2 1.4 ANNUAL PROCESS FOLLOWED BETWEEN AUGUST 2020 AND MAY 2021 Because of Covid-19 and the national lockdown no meetings with ward committees could be held. The municipality therefore opted for to obtain inputs from ward committee members individually by means of google forms. The results of the google forms were captured under the ward detail in this document.

1.5 THE IDP AND AREA PLANS The five area plans include the following: . an understanding of social diversity in the community, the assets, vulnerabilities and preferences of these different social groups; . an analysis of the services available to these groups, as well as the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the community; . a consensus on priorities for the relevant wards; and . Identification of projects for the IDP. Area plans help to ensure that the IDP is more targeted and relevant to addressing the priorities of all groups, including the most vulnerable. Area plans provide ward committees with a systematic planning and implementation tool to perform their roles and responsibilities. They form the basis for dialogue between the Municipality and ward committees regarding the identification of priorities and budget requests and will also be used by ward committees for ongoing monitoring and evaluation throughout the year. Area plans are part and parcel of the IDP and contain information used in defining the Municipality’s long term strategy. The information is however on a detail level and not duplicated in the IDP.

3 2. DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF THE SWARTLAND MUNICIPAL AREA [Update May 2021with figures from the 2020 SEP report]

Total municipal area Demographics in 2016 (Stats SA 2016 Community Survey) Population: Younger than 34: Households: 3 700 km² 133 762 61% 39 139

Education in 2019 (2020 Socio-economic profile, WCG)

Learner-teacher ratio: 31.8 Learner retention: 74.1% Matric pass rate: 84.0% Number of schools: 30 Schools with libraries: 16

Poverty in 2019 (2020 Socio-economic profile, WCG)

Gini Coefficient: 0.58 Human Development Index: 0.78 GDPR per capita: R43 000 Indigent households (Jan 21): 9 259

Access to basic services in 2016 (Stats SA 2016 Community Survey)

Piped water: 92.8% Refuse removal: 83.5% Electricity: 98.7% Sanitation: 96.2%

Economy (2020 Socio-economic profile, WCG) Employment (2020 Socio-economic profile, WCG) Total GDPR contribution: R8 324 million Jobs gained 2014-2018: 1 147

Average annual GDP growth 2014-2018: 1.8% Unemployment rate 2019: 11.0%

Three largest sectors according to GDPR contribution in 2019 (2020 Socio-economic profile, WCG) Manufacturing: 24.9% Wholesale and retail trade, catering and accommodation: 17.8% Agriculture, forestry and fishing: 14.7%

Health in 2019 (2020 Socio-economic profile, PGWC) Number of primary Maternal deaths per Registered patients % babies born to mothers Immunisation rate: 59.8% health care facilities: 14 100 000 live births: 0 receiving ART: 3 034 under 20: 13.0%

Safety and security – Actual number of reported cases in 2019 (2020 Socio-economic profile, PGWC)

Residential burglaries: 777 Driving under the influence: 139 Drug-related crime: 1 473 Murders: 32 Sexual offences: 165

4 3 TOWNS IN THE AREA

3.1 RIEBEEK WEST / RIEBEEK KASTEEL

(a) HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The Riebeek Valley was discovered in 1661 by a European expedition on their route to the north in search for gold. The area was inhabited by the Sanquas, which were hunters, and Khoikhoi who were cattle farmers. With the establishment of Dutch Vryburgers around the Cape, there were growing conflict between the original residents of the area and the new free burghers. Some of the first farmers that settled here were Hugenots. This led to the early establishment of vineyards along with wheat and other fruit crops. The calley grew throughout the years with Riebeek Kasteel as commercial and manufacturing core which served farmers and the establishment of retired farmers mainly in Riebeek West. Examples of a thriving community of early periods can still be seen in the Victorian architectural styles and beauty of the older houses in Riebeek West. In 1929 the railway line from Hermon to Porterville was opened with stations both Riebeek Kasteel and Riebeek West (on a regular basis this line now only takes freight traffic as far as PPC). This made the valley more accessible for farmers to transport their products to the markets and also for people to move between the Cape and the valley. Riebeek West is unique in that two famous South African politicians were born here. In 1870 politician, field marshal and philosopher, , was born on the farm Ongegund. The barn on the farm was converted into a house where mines. In 1874 one of ’s Prime Ministers, D.F. Malan, was born on the farm Allesverloren. Today his family still owns the farm.

(b) DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE Agri-tourism fulfils an appropriate role in this regard. Property prices are escalating as a result of the growing residential demand. The two towns still hold their original function as local agricultural service centres, but a substantial number of the present inhabitants work in . The unique character and the quality of the environment create a popular destination for character and the quality of the environment create a popular destination for artists, while residents relax over the weekends enjoying the tranquil lifestyle. All these factors endow Riebeek Valley with a distinctive local place identity. The PPC cement factory is situated close to Riebeek West and generated to some extent a mining and related commercial setting. However, the future of the towns is not regarded as being vested in industrial and commercial sectors, but rather in tourism and to provide a haven for the retired. Growth potential should be balanced in the context of a well-planned contained growth model to fulfil the residential (retirement) and agri-tourism (wine and olives) functions of the Riebeek Valley towns. In the process infrastructure and services will have to be upgraded and extended to absorb the expected growth. In terms of development potential, the towns are ranked “low” (ranked 94th and 95th respectively), but the unique place identifies emphasizes their residential and tourism features. The needs levels in both villages are relatively low and the suggested investment priority is therefore “minor infrastructure: (perhaps with minor social capital support).

5 (c) SERVICE BACKLOGS Sewerage

. Waste Water Treatment Works already completed. Storm water

. Poorly developed infrastructure, regular flooding in the surroundings of Dennehof Street and Esterhof. Water

. Poorly developed network, small diameter pipes, low pressure, flow condition and open ring mains. . Sections of the water reticulation networks is obsolete and must be upgraded. . Secondary Chlorination reservoirs must be implemented. . Poor condition of Ongegun reservoir and pump station must be upgraded. Streets

. Backlog in resealing program with accompanied by deterioration of road infrastructure. . Many roads are not constructed with kerbstone and formal sidewalks Electricity . PPC town’s network capacity for development limited. . Street lighting is inadequate. . Eskom Area of supply

3.2 TOWN STATISTICS - 2016 Due to the fact that some of the towns fall in different wards the statistical information is provided per town and per ward. The tables below contain the statistics per town while the statistics per ward are reflected under each ward and provide information pertaining to the specific ward.

Population per group Black African Coloured Indian or Asian White Other Total Town No % No % No % No % No % No % Riebeek Kasteel 1 045 12.4% 6 004 70.9% 66 0.8% 1 287 15.2% 63 0.7% 8 465 100.0% Riebeek West 440 5.6% 6 324 80.8% 46 0.6% 1 007 12.9% 13 0.2% 7 830 100.0%

Age distribution per category 0-9 years 10 – 19 years 20-29 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60-69 years 70-79 years 80+ years Town No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % Riebeek Kasteel 1 705 20.1% 1 488 17.6% 1 433 16.9% 1 101 13.0% 1 177 13.9% 715 8.4% 510 6.0% 226 2.7% 110 1.3% Riebeek West 1 286 16.4% 1 483 18.9% 1 206 15.4% 1 013 12.9% 1 152 14.7% 797 10.2% 565 7.2% 243 3.1% 82 1.0% 6 Average household size Town Number of households Average household size Riebeek Kasteel 2 391 3.5 Riebeek West 1 943 4.0

Dwelling types Town House or Traditional Flat or Cluster Town- Semi- House/ Informal Informal Room/ flat Caravan/ Other brick/ dwelling/ apart- house in house detached flat/ room dwelling dwelling let on a tent concrete hut/ ment in a complex (semi- house in (shack in (shack not property block structure block of detached backyard back- in or larger structure made of flats house in a yard) backyard dwelling/ on a traditional complex) e.g. in an servants separate materials informal/ quarters/ stand or squatter granny yard or on settlement flat a farm or on a farm) Riebeek Kasteel 1 699 5 25 2 0 444 7 185 2 5 0 14 Riebeek West 1 657 2 99 0 29 70 15 51 0 0 0 20

Official employment status Employed Unemployed Discouraged work- Other not Age less than 15 N/A seeker economically years Town active No % No % No % No % No % No % Riebeek Kasteel 3 120 36.9% 236 2.8% 39 0.5% 2 022 23.9% 0 0.0% 3 046 36.0% Riebeek West 2 741 35.0% 281 3.6% 68 0.9% 2 175 27.8% 0 0.0% 2 566 32.8%

Individual monthly income Town No Income R1 – 12 800 R12 800 R25 601 R51 201 R102 401 R204 801+ Unspecified Not – R25 600 – R51 200 – R102 400 – R204 800 Applicable Riebeek Kasteel 2 592 4 928 187 80 23 12 7 629 4 Riebeek West 2 556 4 127 241 75 12 3 7 461 349

7 Human settlement overview (Housing) Town Waiting list Financial year Riebeek Kasteel 1 162 2020/21 Riebeek Wes 783 2020/21

Households’ source of energy for lighting Town Electricity Gas Paraffin Candles (not Solar None Unspecified a valid option) Riebeek Kasteel 98.4% 0.9% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Riebeek West 96.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 0.1% 0.6% 0.0%

Households’ source of refuse disposal Town Removed by local Removed by local Communal refuse Own refuse dump No rubbish disposal Other authority/private authority/private dump company at least company less often once a week Riebeek Kasteel 97.4% 0.1% 0.1% 1.7% 0.4% 0.2% Riebeek West 97.8% 0.4% 0.3% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0%

Households’ source of water (Tap information) Town Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water No access to inside dwelling inside yard on community on community on community on community piped (tap) water stand : distance stand : between stand : between stand : distance < 200m from 200m & 500m 500m & 1000m >1000m from dwelling from dwelling from dwelling dwelling Riebeek Kasteel 77.4% 22.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Riebeek West 86.5% 12.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%

8 3.3 CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE AREA Budget Project Ref Project Description 2021/2022 WARDS 3 & 12 19-0014 Water: Riebeek Wes Square: New Borehole, Pumps and Irrigation 150 000 19-0021 Riebeek Kasteel low cost housing development- 435 erven - electrification 150 000 20-0031 Purchase of land: Erf 2111 Riebeek Kasteel 200 000 21-0015 Water: Riebeek Kasteel supply S2.4 200 000 21-0036 Riebeek Kasteel Serviced Sites Project (Fencing) 1 667 500

9 4 WARD DETAIL

4.1 WARD 3 (Riebeek West)

(a) WARD 3 DESCRIPTION: Riebeek West, PPC village as well as surrounding rural area north of Riebeek West

10 (b) WARD 3 COMMITTEE INFORMATION WARD COUNCILLOR: Nicolene Smit

MEMBERS OF THE WARD COMMITTEE

Sector Member Address Town Preferred Tel No Email Economic Vacant Development / Job creation Sport and Recreation Vacant Social Development Edlynne Asja 969 Kacheloffer Street Riebeek Wes Culture/ Tourism / Basil Friedlander P O Box 355 Riebeek Wes (072 237 6188 [email protected] Environment 4 Dennehof Street (022 - 461 2782 Agriculture and Rural Vacant 996 Kuiler Crescent Riebeek Wes 072 277 4148 Development Community Safety Eben Asja 969 Kacheloffer Street Riebeek Wes 082 261 3314 Housing Kacheloffer street Jone Clarke Riebeek-Wes 074 360 1326 1393 Youth Development / Karin Neethling Smutsstraat 11 Riebeek Wes 083 451 5347 Education Municipal Service Antonie Mentoor 1423 Railway Street Riebeek Wes 074 520 5492 Delivery /Infrastructure

11 (c) WARD 3 STATISTICS - 2016 The statistics mentioned below is a holistic picture of ward 3. Population per group Black African Coloured Indian or Asian White Other Total No % No % No % No % No % No % 1 020 9.7% 7 953 75.7% 32 0.3% 1 481 14.1% 26 0.2% 10 512 100.0%

Age distribution per category 0-9 years 10 – 19 years 20-29 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60-69 years 70-79 years 80+ years No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % 1 826 17.4% 1 807 17.2% 1 819 17.3% 1 435 13.6% 1 555 14.8% 1 053 10.0% 652 6.2% 274 2.6% 87 0.8%

Average household size Number of households Average household size 2 790 3.7 Dwelling types House or Traditional Flat or Cluster Town-house Semi- House/ flat/ Informal Informal Room/ flat Caravan/ Other brick/ dwelling/ apart-ment house in (semi- detached room in dwelling dwelling let on a tent concrete hut/ in a block complex detached house backyard (shack in (shack not property or block structure of flats house in a back-yard) in larger structure on made of complex) backyard dwelling/ a separate traditional e.g. in an servants stand or materials informal/ quarters/ yard or on squatter granny flat a farm settlement or on a farm) 2 361 2 69 0 20 153 11 39 25 19 24 69

12 Official employment status Employed Unemployed Discouraged work- Other not economically Age less than 15 years N/A seeker active No % No % No % No % No % No % 4 336 41.2% 264 2.5% 75 0.7% 2 500 23.8% 0 0.0% 3 338 31.8%

Individual monthly income No Income R1 – 12 800 R12 800 R25 601 R51 201 R102 401 R204 801+ Unspecified Not Applicable – R25 600 – R51 200 – R102 400 – R204 800 3 547 5 664 248 93 13 9 8 575 352

Households’ source of energy for lighting Electricity Gas Paraffin Candles (not Solar None Unspecified a valid option) 97.2% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

Households’ source of refuse disposal Removed by local Removed by local Communal refuse dump Own refuse dump No rubbish disposal Other authority/private authority/private company at least once company less often a week 54.5% 2.8% 5.8% 35.2% 1.0% 0.7%

Households’ source of water (Tap information) Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on No access to piped inside dwelling inside yard community stand : community stand : community stand : community stand : (tap) water distance between 200m & between 500m & distance >1000m < 200m from 500m from dwelling 1000m from from dwelling dwelling dwelling 80.1% 15.8% 2.0% 1.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%

13 (d) WARD 3 NEEDS

Most important needs prioritized per strategic goal The following priorities were obtained from a google form survey done with ward committees during October and November 2020. PRIORITY NEEDS Rank Priority Responsible Department Comments 1 GAP Housing Development Services 2 Housing (provide new houses and upgrade Development Services We are currently busy with the construction of 16 additional existing RDP houses) houses in Riebeek west as 228 houses were already completed and handover to successful beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are also responsible for maintenance and upgrading of their houses . 3 Early childhood development centre Development Services No budget available. Private sector partnership is needed for Infra structure funding. 4 Upgrading of roads / tar of streets (Merinhof Civil Engineering Services New roads and maintenance of roads are done i.t.o the Circle, Kuiler Crescent, Koelenberg Street pavement management system (pms) and will be and Sending Street) evaluated against the PMS for possible inclusion in the budget. 5 Promote tourism (tourism office for Riebeek Corporate Services Existing model presently being revisited for implementation West, assist with attracting tourists, of new model envisaged with effect from 1 July 2021 encourage local festivals, establish rose garden) 6 Trading Units formal / Informal Development Services Trading areas exists at the grounds of the Municipality at the Town Hall. Demarcation can take place in order to organise the different units.No budget for formal trading units. 7 New cricket field Civil Engineering Services Will be referred to budget process for prioritisation. 8 Netball courts (provide two netball courts on Clvll Engineering Servlces Will be referred to budget process for prioritisation. existing rugby field with ablution facilities) 9 Fencing of town hall Civil Engineering Services Will be referred to budget process for prioritisation. 10 Fire and Emergency services (need first Protection Services A strategic master plan has been developed and roll out response team and an emergency vehicle) depend on budget allocation. Two Fire fighters are employed to the Riebeek Valley as part of the reservists.

14 4.2 WARD 12 (Riebeek Kasteel)

(a) WARD 12 DESCRIPTION: Riebeek Kasteel, Esterhof as well as surrounding rural areas.

15 (b) WARD 12 COMMITTEE INFORMATION WARD COUNCILLOR: Desiree Bess MEMBERS OF THE WARD COMMITTEE Sector Member Address Town Preferred Tel No Email Culture / Tourism / Vacant Environment Municipal Service Jacobus De Bruin Tulp street 17 Riebeek Kasteel 076 235 0015 Delivery / infrastructure Youth Development / Wilhelmina 7 Leeubekkie street Riebeek Kasteel 079 805 2881 Education (Wilmien) La Meyer Municipal Service Vacant Delivery / infrastructure Social Development Donald H King 30 Pieter Cruythof Str Riebeek Kasteel 082 559 0817 [email protected] PO Box 114 022 - 448 1236 Sport and Recreation Gustav Maarman Vygiestraat 45 Riebeek Kasteel 073 148 8506 Community Safety Economic Development / Job Michael Maneli 35 Mimosa street Riebeek Kasteel 074 750 5917 creation Agriculture / Rural Michiel N Smuts Grasrug Farm Malmesbury 082 920 8116 [email protected] Development PO Box 169 Health / Welfare Constance Waterblommetjiestraa Riebeek Kasteel 063 563 9317 Gwadiso t 5

16 (c) WARD 12 STATISTICS - 2016 The statistics mentioned below is a holistic of ward 12. Population per group Black African Coloured Indian or Asian White Other Total No % No % No % No % No % No % 1 676 15.8% 7 469 70.3% 62 0.6% 1 367 12.9% 43 0.4% 10 617 100.0%

Age distribution per category 0-9 years 10 – 19 years 20-29 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60-69 years 70-79 years 80+ years No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % 1 937 18.2% 1 705 16.1% 2 191 20.6% 1 506 14.2% 1 480 13.9% 928 8.7% 591 5.6% 202 1.9% 78 0.7%

Average household size Number of households Average household size 2 604 4.0

Dwelling types House or Traditional Flat or Cluster Town-house Semi- House/ flat/ Informal Informal Room/ flat Caravan/ Other brick/ dwelling/ apart-ment house in (semi- detached room in dwelling dwelling let on a tent concrete hut/ in a block complex detached house backyard (shack in (shack not property or block structure of flats house in a back-yard) in larger structure on made of complex) backyard dwelling/ a separate traditional e.g. in an servants stand or materials informal/ quarters/ yard or on squatter granny flat a farm settlement or on a farm) 2 027 4 23 1 7 368 10 109 3 11 0 39

17 Official employment status Employed Unemployed Discouraged work- Other not economically Age less than 15 years N/A seeker active No % No % No % No % No % No % 4 275 40.3% 206 1.9% 47 0.4% 2 769 26.1% 0 0.0% 3 320 31.3%

Individual monthly income No Income R1 – 12 800 R12 800 R25 601 R51 201 R102 401 R204 801+ Unspecified Not – R25 600 – R51 200 – R102 400 – R204 800 Applicable 2 614 6 051 203 76 27 12 7 637 987

Households’ source of energy for lighting Electricity Gas Paraffin Candles (not a Solar None Unspecified valid option) 98.9% 0.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0%

Households’ source of refuse disposal Removed by local Removed by local Communal refuse dump Own refuse dump No rubbish disposal Other authority/private authority/private company at least once company less often a week 56.8% 1.1% 13.7% 24.8% 1.7% 2.0%

Households’ source of water (Tap information) Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on Piped (tap) water on No access to piped inside dwelling inside yard community stand : community stand : community stand : community stand : (tap) water distance between 200m & between 500m & distance >1000m < 200m from 500m from dwelling 1000m from from dwelling dwelling dwelling 73.1% 24.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4%

18 (d) WARD 12 NEEDS

Most important needs prioritized per strategic goal The following priorities were obtained from a google form survey done with ward committees during October and November 2020. PRIORITY NEEDS Rank Priority Responsible Department Comments 1 New high school WCG - Department of The need will be registered with the Department of Education. Education 2 Early childhood development (ECD centres Development Service Refer need to the Department of Social Development and and qualified teachers. Playground equipment Grassroots. for young children at facilities ) 3 Development of sport facilities (Construction of Civil Engineering Services Need must be referred to budgetary process for consideration. soccer field. Skateboard park/ skateboarding circuit. Irrigation of rugby field) 4 Services to backyard dwellers Civil Engineering Services / The plots already have service connections, it is matter of on-site Electrical Services sharing. 5 Refuse removal (provide refuse bins. Recycling Civil Engineering Services It must be noted that refuse bags are provided to indigent / garden refuse / building refuse) households. The implementation of a wheelie bin system for household refuse is known to be more costly than the bag system which is applied throughout Swartland at present. The implementation of a pilot site is considered at present in order to determine whether the desired benefit will be derived should a complete change to a wheelie bin system be implemented 6 Tourism and entrepreneurial support (tourism Corporate Services Existing model presently being revisited for implementation of training opportunities. Law enforcement more new model envisaged with effect from 1 July 2021 visible in towns for tourists. Encourage local festivals. Funding for tourism offices. Upgrading of Plain square) 7 Youth development programmes (Drug Development Service Drug related programmes can be addressed through the Local related programmes. Teach youth how to be Drug Action Committee (LDAC) and the Department of Social entrepreneurs. Life skills (grade 12 and after Development. The Youth office can address the vocational, school)) communication and life skills programmes that are needed. 8 Security (Include security cameras. Assist with a Protection Services This request for cameras is linked to budget availability. space for the CPF. Fire training for households) 9 Better health services (redevelopment of the WCG - Department of The need will be registered with the Department of Health clinic and land for a new clinic) Health 10 Adult development Development Service Parenting skills training arranged through the ECD Community Development Worker and Responsible use of alcohol can be dressed through the LDAC 19 ANNEXURE 1: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PROPOSALS

The Swartland Spatial Development Framework (SDF) is a document that sets out the necessary policy guidelines to guide spatial development in the municipal area in a desirable and sustainable manner. The future growth, development and land use planning in the municipal area must be based on the vision and principles that was agreed upon to address spatial challenges/problems and to ensure the creation and support of integrated, sustainable and liveable environments through the creation and support of socio economic opportunities. The Executive Mayoral Committee has in August 2018 decided to amend the Municipal Spatial Development Framework for specific focus areas including housing, institutional and cemetery needs. The purpose of the amendment is to create a document that gives direction and to guide spatial development in the previously mentioned focus areas. The amendment of the Municipal Spatial Development Framework for the specific focus areas for Riebeek West and Riebeek Kasteel has been approved by council in May 2019 and indicates the following: Riebeek West 1. Housing  Private property earmarked for residential development - against mountain  Residential development on Erf 106  Private property earmarked for residential development on Erf 23  Sportfield vs residential development on erven 326/327 2. Institutional  No current additional needs 3. Cemeteries  No current additional needs 4. General  Amendments to land use and ward proposals as per schedule

20 Riebeek West

21 Riebeek Kasteel

1. Housing

 Residential opportunities or farm workers on farm 645 (minor change to urban edge required)  Services site development on farm 661/11 (In construction phase)  Integrated residential opportunities on erven 489/1323/2111  Small farmers and recreation opportunities on remainder of farm 661/11

2. Institutional

 School, Thusong centre, library and clinic earmarked in area along Main Road on erven 489/1323/2111  Community Hall on erf 433  ECD facility on portion of Erf 1839

3. Cemeteries

 Existing new cemetery - no additional needs

4. General

 Amendments to land use and ward proposals as per schedule

22 Riebeek Kasteel

23