DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Plan 2014 Planning for a Rural Community in the 21 Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Plan 2014 Planning for a Rural Community in the 21 Century i Comprehensive Plan 2014 Planning for a Rural Community in the 21st Century i Recommended by the Seneca County Planning Board February 13, 2014 Recommended by the Town of Tyre Comprehensive Planning Committee February 18, 2014 Approved by the Tyre Town Board February 20, 2014 Special thanks to the Seneca County Real Property Tax Office and Map Technician Mike Karlsen for preparing all the maps in this plan. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures iii List of Tables iii List of Maps iv Introduction 1 Land Use 5 Watershed Protection and Environmental Quality 13 Agriculture and Farmland 17 Housing and Residential Neighborhoods 21 Tax Base and Economic Development 25 Transportation and Infrastructure 28 Community Facilities and Services 33 History and Historic Resources 42 Implementation Plan 48 Appendices Appendix A 53 Appendix B 62 iii LIST OF FIGURES 1. Assessed valuation in Tyre by real property type 26 2. Richmond Aqueduct 45 3. Tyre Band Hall 46 LIST OF TABLES Implementation Plan Land Use 49 Watershed Protection and Environmental Quality 49 Agriculture and Farmland 50 Housing and Residential Neighborhoods 50 Tax Base and Economic Development 50 Transportation and Infrastructure 51 Community Facilities and Services 52 Historic Resources 52 iv LIST OF MAPS LAND USE OVERVIEW 1. Town Map 6 2. Existing Land Use 7 3. Zoning Map 9 4. Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge 11 WATERSHED PROTECTION AND NATURAL RESOURCES 5. Rivers, Streams and Wetlands 14 AGRICULTURE AND FARMLAND 6. Soils by Drainage Type 18 HOUSING AND RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS 7. Residential Parcels 22 TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE 8. Roads and Highways, Water and Sewer 30 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES 9. Government, Fire Stations and Community Facilities 36 10. School Districts 37 HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. Locations of Historical Note 44 v 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Tyre is a careful and deliberate review of the present and reasonably foreseeable needs of the community, whereby the town can adopt a general developmental policy for the community as a whole and amend its zoning law in accordance with that plan. In other words, the Comprehensive Plan is a guide for local officials and community members in making a wide range of decisions (land use, infrastructure development, recreational amenities, environmental preservation, etc.) that will affect the future of the town. Future actions that will be based on the policies and recommendations in the Plan include revisions to zoning and other local laws and regulations, capital budgeting, and providing services to the community. The Comprehensive Plan addresses the full spectrum of issues facing the town and balances competing needs and interests in the community. Legal Basis The Comprehensive Plan has been prepared pursuant to NYS Town Law §272-a. Town Law §272-a specifies that Town Boards are responsible for preparing and adopting Comprehensive Plans. As the law also permits the Town Boards to delegate this responsibility to an ad hoc Commission established for the express purpose of preparing Comprehensive Plans, the Town Board of Tyre appointed a joint Comprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) to guide the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is a policy document that does not in itself, have the force of law. However, the Plan will influence changes in Town laws and regulations as well as funding decisions and other Town actions during the next 10 to 15 years. In particular, local zoning regulations must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Process of Preparing the Plan The Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Tyre represents the culmination of a planning process that began in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan Commission met monthly for more than one year to coordinate the preparation of the Plan. 2 Members of the CPC included representatives from the Town Board, Planning Board, and citizens at large. The following persons served on the Comprehensive Plan Committee: • Robert Seem(PB), Chairman • Alan Smith(PB), Vice Chairman • Ronald McGreevy(Town Board) • Neil Worden(PB) • David Kain(PB) • Larry Kesel (PB) • Deborah Geary (PB) • Ken Hauenstein (PB) • Marjorie Fahrenholz (Concerned Citizens of Tyre) Public participation included a Residents’ Survey (see Appendix A), distributed in July 2008, a public informational meeting to present the results of the Residents’ Survey (2014), a CPC public hearing (2014). Plan Organization The Land Use Overview presents an overview of the community, summarizes the issues addressed in each section, and shows how the individual topical areas relate to one another. It also presents an introduction to zoning and subdivision regulations, which are the primary tools available to the Towns to help achieve the land use goals of the Plan. A Future Land Use and Conservation Map presents the Towns’ policies regarding land use, and will be used as a guide in revising the Towns’ zoning map. Topical sections of the Comprehensive Plan address the major issues identified by the community: • Watershed Protection and Environmental Quality; • Agriculture and Farmland; • Housing and Residential Neighborhoods; • Tax Base and Economic Development; • Transportation and Infrastructure; 3 • Community Facilities and Services; • Historic Resources. In each section, the Plan presents: • Goals; • Background Information; • Issues and Opportunities; • Recommended Actions. Within Appendices of the Plan present additional information that supports and/or provides the context for the recommendations in the Plan. • Residents’ Survey Summary and Results in Appendix A and B present the relevant findings from the survey of Tyre residents conducted in the Summer of 2008. • Highlights of Public Hearings summarize the issues and recommendations presented by residents and resource people who met with the CPC. The Implementation Strategy summarizes the recommended actions by topic, with a proposed time frame, responsible agency, cost estimate, and potential funding sources. A summary of the recommended actions by time frame provides a year-by-year guide to implementing the Plan. Monitoring and Updating the Plan The Town of Tyre is not static, but is in a constant state of flux and change. Over time, the changes that occur in the community may render the Comprehensive Plan outdated or inappropriate if the Plan is not updated to take the changes into consideration. Accordingly, it is essential for the Town Board to monitor changes in their respective communities and to reevaluate the relevance and appropriateness of the goals set forth in the Plan and the measures recommended to achieve the goals. The Plan should then be updated, as necessary, to revise appropriately the goals and recommended actions so the Plan may continue to serve as a useful and relevant guide for Town officials. The Town of Tyre should be updated at 5-year intervals. The Town Board can enlist the Town Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals to assist with reviewing and updating the Plan as these boards may have much information and 4 insight that may be beneficial to the Town Board in determining how the Plan should be revised. As with the initial adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, future amendments to the Plan will require both environmental reviews to evaluate potential adverse impacts and public hearings to provide members of the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment. 5 LAND USE Goals A. Retain the rural, agricultural heritage of the Town. B. Identify and manage development in such a way as to preserve farmland and natural resources. C. Support residential development that is consistent with the character of neighboring areas. D. Support commercial and industrial development that is consistent with the character of neighboring areas. E. Build consensus on a vision for land use and design concepts for future development within the town. Background Information Tyre is primarily a farming community dotted with woods and pockets of residential zones. The topography and soils vary within the town from rolling fields to high drumlins and clay soils to loam. The Town of Tyre is located in the North East portion of Seneca County (Map 1). The town is bordered by Wayne County to the North, Cayuga County to the East, the Seneca County Town of Junius to the West and the Seneca County Town of Seneca Falls to the South. Natural features in the Town include woodlots, wetlands, the Seneca River (and portions of the Erie Canal and Seneca Cayuga Canal), streams (Black Brook, White Brook) and the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge. Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge occupies nearly one third (11 sq. mi.) of the Town of Tyre. Three unincorporated hamlets include Tyre City, Magee Corners, and Mays Point. Agricultural land is the single greatest resource and land use in the town (Map 2). Over that last two centuries, agricultural land use in Tyre reached its maximum during the middle of the 20th century, and then declined as smaller farms on less suitable soils diminished production. In addition, two events have contributed to further loss of farmland: the construction of the New York State Thruway, which bisects the town and includes an exit (approximately 180 acres) and the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge and wetlands expansion (approximately 950 acres). More detail about agricultural land use can be found in the Agriculture and Farmland section. However, the Town of Tyre is not totally agricultural. Commercial development has occurred along its major transportation routes,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Low Bridge, Everybody Down' (WITH INDEX)
    “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Chuck Friday Editor and Commentator 2005 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 1 Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE Introduction ………………………………………………………………….. 3 The Erie Canal as a Federal Project………………………………………….. 3 New York State Seizes the Initiative………………………………………… 4 Biographical Sketch of Jesse Hawley - Early Erie Canal Advocate…………. 5 Western Terminus for the Erie Canal (Black Rock vs Buffalo)……………… 6 Digging the Ditch……………………………………………………………. 7 Yankee Ingenuity…………………………………………………………….. 10 Eastward to Albany…………………………………………………………… 12 Westward to Lake Erie………………………………………………………… 16 Tying Up Loose Ends………………………………………………………… 20 The Building of a Harbor at Buffalo………………………………………….. 21 Canal Workforce……………………………………………………………… 22 The Irish Worker Story……………………………………………………….. 27 Engineering Characteristics of Canals………………………………………… 29 Early Life on the Canal……………………………………………………….. 33 Winter – The Canal‘sGreatest Impediment……………………………………. 43 Canal Expansion………………………………………………………………. 45 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 2 ―Low Bridge; Everybody Down!‖ Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Initial Resource Book: Dan Murphy, The Erie Canal: The Ditch That Opened A Nation, 2001 Introduction A foolhardy proposal, years of political bickering and partisan infighting, an outrageous $7.5 million price tag (an amount roughly equal to about $4 billion today) – all that for a four foot deep, 40 foot wide ditch connecting Lake Erie in western New York with the Hudson River in Albany. It took 7 years of labor, slowly clawing shovels of earth from the ground in a 363-mile trek across the wilderness of New York State. Through the use of many references, this paper attempts to describe this remarkable construction project. Additionally, it describes the early operation of the canal and its impact on the daily life on or near the canal‘s winding path across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Guide to Wetland Plants Important to Waterfowl and Marsh Management in Central New York by Michael L
    An Introductory Guide to Wetland Plants Important to Waterfowl and Marsh Management in Central New York by Michael L. Schummer Roosevelt Waterfowl Ecologist Roosevelt Wild Life Station SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Disclaimer: This is not a complete guide to the wetland plants of New York, but a list of plants commonly occurring in managed and unmanaged wetlands that are 1/ food for waterfowl and other seed eating birds, 2/ cover for invertebrates eaten by ducklings and other fish and wildlife, and 3/ invasive plants that often require control to ensure a diversity of native plants can flourish. This should not serve as an ultimate guide to wetland plant management. Always follow herbicide labeling and regulations. Always obtain the proper permits before conducting wetland management activities. Introduction: In my experience, few waterfowl enthusiasts (birders and hunters) fully understand the diversity of plants used by waterfowl for food and cover. My intent is to provide a VERY basic introductory guide to these plants and descriptions about their identification and management. In Marsh History, I provide some historical context about the loss of wetlands in the central New York region and why management of wetlands are critical to ensure quality habitats are available for migratory waterfowl. In Important Wetland Plants as Food, I cover the most common plants producing seeds, tubers, and vegetation eaten by waterfowl. Here I express the utility of annual plants in producing an abundance of food for waterfowl because these plants DO NOT return the next year from their roots; their only way of continuing to exist is from their production of seeds that must germinate the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Land Protection Plan
    Appendix F USFWS Great Blue Heron at Tschache Pool U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Land Protection Plan Table of Contents Introduction, Purpose, and Scope ................................................................................................. F-1 Project Description....................................................................................................................... F-2 Status of Resources to be Protected ............................................................................................. F-7 Continuing Partnership Effort ...................................................................................................... F-9 Action and Objectives .................................................................................................................. F-9 Protection Options ..................................................................................................................... F-14 Acquisition Methods .................................................................................................................. F-16 Coordination .............................................................................................................................. F-18 Socioeconomic and Cultural Impacts ........................................................................................ F-18 Attachment 1. Parcel Maps and Table ....................................................................................... F-20 Attachment 2. NYSDEC Letter of
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geology of the Finger Lakes Region Henry T
    1 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE FINGER LAKES REGION HENRY T. MULLINS, ROBERT W. WELLNER, JOHN L. PETRUCCIONE, EDWARD J. HINCHEY and STEVEN WANZER Department of Geology Syracuse University Syracuse, New York 13244 INTRODUCTION The Finger Lakes of central New York State (Fig. 1) have long been recognized as the product of continental glaciation. In 1868 Louis Agassiz spoke of the "glacial heritage" of the region (Coates, 1968) and since then numerous glacial geomorphic investigations have been undertaken (Mullins et al., 1989) . However, most previous studies dealt with surficial features and because of this relatively little was known about the subsurface Quaternary geology of these world renown lakes. That the Finger Lakes are deeply scoured and infilled by thick sediment sequences was known from bathymetric surveys of the lakes completed in the late 1800's (Bloomfield, 1978), a drill record of 1,080' (329m) of unconsolidated sediment at Watkins Glen (Tarr, 1904), and the publication of a line drawing of one seismic reflection profile from Seneca Lake (Woodrow et al., 1969). This paucity of subsurface geologic data has been a major void in our knowledge and understanding of the geologic history of the Finger Lakes. Many questions remained unresolved including the most fundamental -- "When and by what processes were the great Finger Lakes troughs eroded?" (Bloom, 1984, p. 61). Based on the one seismic reflection profile from Seneca Lake, Bloom (1984) noted that bedrock beneath the lake floor was more V-shaped like that of a river valley rather than the expected U-shaped glacial trough, and that there had been multiple erosional and depositional events.
    [Show full text]
  • Montezuma Wetlands and the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge
    The Montezuma Wetlands and the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge As a result of the retreating glaciers about 10 to 12 thousand years ago, a marsh area developed near the north end of Cayuga Lake. This marsh became known as the Montezuma Marsh because of a Dr. Peter Clark who settled in this area. When he was building his new home in 1806 on an elevated area, he named his home after the palace of the Aztec Emperor Montezuma. Soon the entire marsh and nearby village became known by the name Montezuma. The reconstruction of the Seneca and Cayuga extension of the New York State Barge Canal, starting in 1910, greatly altered the Montezuma Marsh. A new lock and dam lowered the Seneca River by eight feet, causing water to drain from the marsh. This helped to create what locals call the “muck lands” where many table crops are grown yet today. In 1937 the Bureau of Biological Survey (later known as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) purchased 6,432 acres of the former Montezuma Marsh. The Civilian Conservation Corps (C.C.C.) built a series of low dikes to hold water and restore part of the marsh habitat that had previously existed. In 1938, the Montezuma Migratory Bird Refuge (today known as the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge) was established by Executive Order 7971 to provide “a Refuge and breeding ground for migratory birds and other wildlife….” The Refuge is situated in the middle of one of the most active flight lanes in the Atlantic Flyway. The Refuge provides great opportunities for people to observe wildlife with its 3.5 miles auto loop and various observation towers.
    [Show full text]
  • Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2013 Front cover: Waterfowl Hunter Dave Menke, USFWS Greater Yellowlegs at Puddlers Marsh ©Doug Racine Duck Banding Bernie Stopper Refuge Staff Measuring Cedar USFWS American Bald Eagle and Blue Heron ©Cathy McCollumn Child Observing Wildlife Andrea VanBeusichem, USFWS Back cover: Montezuma NWR Visitor Center ©Doug Racine This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is the principal Federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of over 150 million acres including more than 555 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. The Service also operates 70 national fish hatcheries and 81 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces Federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans (CCPs) provide long-term guidance for management decisions on a refuge and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes. CCPs also identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Town-Meetings, in the Early Day, in Their Pure Democracy and Perfect Freedom, Lodi
    HISTORY OF SENECA COUNTY, NEW YORK. 33 Messrs. and Knox. Seventeen wit Prisoner's counsel, Hulbert, Mott, Stryker, sibility. Elections were honestly conducted. Men voted for what they regarded nesses were and the case submitted to the following-named as the best man. examined, finally Tickets lay upon the table, and every one took his choice. : John Abial John Tyler Elections were on jurors Norris, Aury Marsh, Cook, White, Smith, Israel held three successive days, and each day at a different point in Benjamin Robert Garvin Peter B. Haines, Cuddeback, Livingston, Stevenson, the town. If a man in Junius did not get to the polls at Hooper's, to-day, to and Jacob Sell. The gallows was erected on the Whitmer, George Bachman, morrow, he could go to Nate Matthews's ; failing to go there, he still had a chance "Island," when the doomed man met his fate a of troops surrounded at and body Jacob Stahl's, by Cayuga Bridge. When Junius was formed, in 1802, a meet were" upon water and buildings far around crowded the scaffold ; boats the by ing was held, and Lewis Birdsall was chosen Supervisor, and Gideon Bowditch, curious spectators, whose memories will never efface the scene. Conforming to a Town Clerk. Other officers, later distinguished in County history, were three igno- belief that such exhibitions demoralize, the criminals of modern days perish Assessors, Asa Moore, Hugh W. Dobbin, and Elisha Pratt; three Commis seclusion of the in presence of officials and time sioners of miniously in the jail-yard, only, Highways, Jesse Southwick, Jabez Disbrow, and Nathaniel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayne Cnty AEM 2015-2020 Strategy
    Wayne County Agricultural Environmental Management Strategic Plan 2015 – 2020 Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation District partnered with: Mission Statement The mission of the Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation District AEM Strategic Plan is to coordinate and conduct outreach to the agricultural community to educate people about the AEM program and to facilitate and encourage AEM participation by farmers in watersheds to improve and protect the environment. Vision Statement The vision of the Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation District AEM Strategic Plan is to partner the farming public and stakeholders and use the AEM program to evaluate and prioritize conservation areas of concern on farms to ultimately implement best management practices that will improve soil and water quality in local watersheds. Introduction Wayne County is located on the southern shore of Lake Ontario in North Western New York. Located on the banks of Lake Ontario, approximately midway between the City of Rochester and the City of Oswego, and just north of the New York State Thruway, Wayne County has access to some of the best land in New York State, as well as being situated in a moderate climate optimum for a variety of commodities but specializing in hearty fruit production. Status of Agriculture in Wayne County Wayne County is in the top five producing counties for New York State in soybeans, dry beans, sweet and tart cherries, peaches, pears, plums, asparagus, carrots, onions, apples, wheat, and potatoes. In addition, Wayne County is the number one county for fruit and berries in New York. In 2012, there were 179,109 acres in farms, 46% of the County’s total 386,696 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New York State Open Space Conservation Plan
    Department of Parks, Recreation Department Agriculture Department of Environmental and Historic of State and Markets Transportation Conservation Preservation 2016 NEW YORK STATE OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN www.dec.ny.gov This page intentionally left blank Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Lead Agencies: The Department of Environmental Conservation Basil Seggos, Commissioner The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Rose Harvey, Commissioner Partnering Agencies: The Department of Agriculture & Markets The Department of Transportation The Department of State DEFINITION OF OPEN SPACE Open space is defined as land which is not intensively developed for residential, commercial, industrial or institutional use. Open space can be publicly or privately owned. It includes agricultural and forest land, undeveloped coastal and estuarine lands, undeveloped scenic lands, public parks and preserves. It also includes water bodies such as lakes and bays. What land is defined as open space depends in part on its surroundings. A vacant lot or a small marsh can be open space in a big city. A narrow corridor or pathway for walking or bicycling is open space even though it is surrounded by developed areas. And while not strictly open space, this Plan also discusses cultural and historic resources which, along with open space, are part of the heritage of New York State. Inside Cover: View of Henderson Lake, Tahawus Tract acrylic by Lauryn Kashdan-Schrom Cover: Clockwise from left. Ashland Pinnacle State Forest by Melody Wolcott; Catskill Challenge 2016; Playground at Roberto Clemente State Park by John Rozell; Essex Chain of Lakes by Melody Wolcott. This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW YORK STATE OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW0B YORK STATE’S _____________________________________________________ 1 OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN ________________________________________ 1 It starts with the land.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCHESTER and ITS EARLY CA1IAL DAYS Horace Pierce Marsh
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection K- 1 1 ROCHESTER AND ITS EARLY CA1IAL DAYS Horace Pierce Marsh Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Rochester Public Library Reference Book Not For Circulation Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection ROCHESTER and its EARLY CANAL DAYS By CAPT H. P. MARSH Type of Rochester Built Bullhead Boat '' The Onward,'' Captain Delos Polley of St. Paul Street, Rochester, N. Y. Reminiscences of the Author PRICE, 25 CENTS. T914 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection ROCHESTER and its EARLY CANAL DAYS Reminiscences of the Author, while engaged on the New York State Waterways, the Erie, Genesee Valley, Black River, and other lateral canals. CAPT. H. P. MARSH /// 1914 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection n III mini i i in ii i '"in Dedicated to the Foster Parents of the Author. They were true friends to the Orphan Boy. Mill I Illllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIINIIIIIII Copyright 191/, by H. P. Marsh. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection 77) 5 ^'^ PREFACE.- HIS is not a history of the New York State canals, but recollections of the writer while engaged in the transportation business on those waters, although some history will be quoted for the benefit of those not familiar with its early chronicles. It is what the author has seen through his own experience, and heard recounted by others. The exact dates cannot be given in all in- stances, as no diary was kept, but I think this account in plain words, by one familiar with the circumstances, will be more interesting and truthful than a more noted author s history who had no experience or way of getting it, only through old musty records.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve and a Half Miles the Erie Canal in Cayuga County the Web Edition Section Three by Michael Riley
    Twelve and a Half Miles The Erie Canal in Cayuga County The Web Edition Section Three By Michael Riley 1 Table of Contents for Section Three Chapter Page Twelve- Montezuma 3 Thirteen- The Cayuga and Seneca Canals 12 Fourteen- The Seneca River Aqueduct 15 Fifteen- The Cayuga Marshes and Seneca River 22 Sixteen- Bridges 27 Seventeen- The Barge Canal 29 Bibliography 32 Other Sections include; Introduction One– Maps of the Trail and Canal Two- Clinton’s Ditch Three- The Canal Enlargement Four- Locks Five-Culverts and Ditches Six- The Water Supply System Seven- Cold Spring Pump and Fountainville Eight-Weedsport Nine-The Centerport Aqueduct Ten- Centerport Eleven-Port Byron This web edition was written as an updated version of the book “Twelve and a Half Miles” which was self published in 2002. It is intended by the author to be free as a pdf file. February 1, 2012 2 Twelve- Montezuma Montezuma had been around for almost thirty years before the Erie Canal came to the area. A small salt spring had been found in a creek to the north of the present village and the manufacture of salt had started as early as 1792. The salt trade, along with fishing and transportation of goods along the Seneca had given the impetus to the settlement of the small village. In 1810 DeWitt Clin- ton made these observations about Montezuma: “Montezuma is in No. 80 Brutus, in the town of Mentz, and is situated on a strip of land be- tween the river and Cayuga marshes and marsh in the rear, and cannot therefore be healthy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Land Protection Plan
    Appendix F USFWS Great Blue Heron at Tschache Pool U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Land Protection Plan Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Land Protection Plan Table of Contents Introduction, Purpose, and Scope................................................................................................. F-1 Project Description ....................................................................................................................... F-2 Status of Resources to be Protected ............................................................................................. F-6 Continuing Partnership Effort .................................................................................................... F-10 Action and Objectives ................................................................................................................ F-10 Protection Options ..................................................................................................................... F-15 Acquisition Methods .................................................................................................................. F-17 Coordination .............................................................................................................................. F-19 Socioeconomic and Cultural Impacts ........................................................................................ F-19 Attachment 1. Parcel Maps and Table ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]