DOCSLIB.ORG

TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM and RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM and RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Hon. Hedy Fry, Chair FEBRUARY 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. Also available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Hon. Hedy Fry Chair FEBRUARY 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION NOTICE TO READER Reports from committee presented to the House of Commons Presenting a report to the House is the way a committee makes public its findings and recommendations on a particular topic. Substantive reports on a subject-matter study usually contain a synopsis of the testimony heard, the recommendations made by the committee, as well as the reasons for those recommendations. STANDING COMMITTEE ON CANADIAN HERITAGE CHAIR Hon. Hedy Fry VICE-CHAIRS Hon. Peter Van Loan Pierre Nantel MEMBERS Pierre Breton Jim Eglinski Sean Casey* Stéphane Lauzon* Julie Dabrusin Martin Shields Anju Dhillon Dan Vandal Julie Dzerowicz Arif Virani* * Non-voting member, pursuant to Standing Order 104(5). iii OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED William Amos Bernard Généreux Seamus O’Regan David Anderson Garnett Genius Scott Reid Frank Baylis Cheryl Hardcastle Jean R. Rioux Rachel Blaney Majid Jowhari Ruby Sahota Celina Caesar- Robert Kitchen Darrell Samson Chavannes Hon. Michael D. Chong Jenny Kwan Ramesh Sangha Roger Cuzner Linda Lapointe Scott Simms Pam Damoff Michael Levitt David Sweet Francis Drouin Larry Maguire Mark Warawa Peter Fragiskatos Bryan May Kevin Waugh Colin Fraser Elizabeth May Nick Whalen CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Andrew Bartholomew Chaplin Michael MacPherson LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Gabrielle de Billy Brown Erin Virgint iv THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CANADIAN HERITAGE has the honour to present its TENTH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(2), the Committee has studied Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination and has agreed to report the following: v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 1 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .................................................................................. 7 1.1 THE COMMITTEE’S STUDY ................................................................................................... 7 1.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .......................................................... 8 1.2.2 Canadian Human Rights Act ...................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Canadian Multiculturalism Act ................................................................................. 9 1.2.4 Criminal Code ............................................................................................................... 10 1.2.5 United Nations Documents ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.5.1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights .................................................. 10 1.2.5.2 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ................................................................................ 11 1.3 EXISTING INITIATIVES ....................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................ 14 1.3.1.1 Multiculturalism Program ............................................................................ 14 1.3.1.2 Canadian Race Relations Foundation ....................................................... 15 1.3.1.3 Court Challenges Program ............................................................................ 15 1.3.1.4 Office of Human Rights, Freedoms and Inclusion ............................... 16 1.3.2 Provincial ....................................................................................................................... 16 1.4 KEY TERMS .............................................................................................................................. 19 1.4.1 Systemic racism ........................................................................................................... 19 1.4.2 Religious Discrimination.......................................................................................... 21 1.4.3 Islamophobia ................................................................................................................ 22 1.4.4 Intersectionality .......................................................................................................... 24 vii PART 2: RACE AND RELIGION ISSUES IN CANADA................................................................ 25 2.1 PRESENTATION OF THE CURRENT DATA .................................................................. 25 2.1.1 Police-reported hate crimes ................................................................................... 26 2.1.2 Self-reported hate crimes ........................................................................................ 29 2.2 CHALLENGES WITH COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS ................................................. 30 2.2.1 Underreporting ............................................................................................................ 30 2.2.2 Lack of uniformity ...................................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Improving reporting .................................................................................................. 32 2.3 RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................ 34 2.4 ISSUES RAISED BY WITNESSES ....................................................................................... 34 2.4.1 Hate speech, freedom of speech and freedom of conscience ..................... 36 2.4.2 Discrimination related to employment .............................................................. 38 2.4.3 Social discrimination ................................................................................................. 39 2.5 LEGAL CONCERNS RAISED BY WITNESSES................................................................ 41 2.5.1 Criminal Code review ................................................................................................ 41 2.5.2 Facilitate investigation and prosecution of hate crimes.............................. 43 2.5.3 Legislation related to Indigenous Peoples ........................................................ 44 PART 3: MOVING FORWARD........................................................................................................... 46 3.1 NATIONAL ACTION PLAN—A WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT APPROACH .......... 46 3.1.1 Development of a National Strategy ................................................................... 47 3.1.2 Race Equity Lens ......................................................................................................... 49 3.1.3 Benchmarks and Accountability ........................................................................... 52 3.1.4 Intersectionality .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Politics of E-Cigarette Regulation in Australia, Canada and New Zealand by Alex C
    Formulating a Regulatory Stance: The Comparative Politics of E-Cigarette Regulation in Australia, Canada and New Zealand by Alex C. Liber A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Health Services Organizations and Policy) in The University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Professor Scott Greer, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Holly Jarman, Co-Chair Professor Daniel Béland, McGill University Professor Paula Lantz Alex C. Liber [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7863-3906 © Alex C. Liber 2020 Dedication For Lindsey and Sophia. I love you both to the ends of the earth and am eternally grateful for your tolerance of this project. ii Acknowledgments To my family – Lindsey, you made the greatest sacrifices that allowed this project to come to fruition. You moved away from your family to Michigan. You allowed me to conduct two months of fieldwork when you were pregnant with our daughter. You helped drafts come together and were a constant sounding board and confidant throughout the long process of writing. This would not have been possible without you. Sophia, Poe, and Jo served as motivation for this project and a distraction from it when each was necessary. Mom, Dad, Chad, Max, Julian, and Olivia, as well as Papa Ernie and Grandma Audrey all, helped build the road that I was able to safely walk down in the pursuit of this doctorate. You served as role models, supports, and friends that I could lean on as I grew into my career and adulthood. Lisa, Tony, and Jessica Suarez stepped up to aid Lindsey and me with childcare amid a move, a career transition, and a pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • CIC Diversity Colume 6:2 Spring 2008
    VOLUME 6:2 SPRING 2008 Guest Editor The Experiences of Audrey Kobayashi, Second Generation Queen’s University Canadians Support was also provided by the Multiculturalism and Human Rights Program at Canadian Heritage. Spring / printemps 2008 Vol. 6, No. 2 3 INTRODUCTION 69 Perceived Discrimination by Children of A Research and Policy Agenda for Immigrant Parents: Responses and Resiliency Second Generation Canadians N. Arthur, A. Chaves, D. Este, J. Frideres and N. Hrycak Audrey Kobayashi 75 Imagining Canada, Negotiating Belonging: 7 Who Is the Second Generation? Understanding the Experiences of Racism of A Description of their Ethnic Origins Second Generation Canadians of Colour and Visible Minority Composition by Age Meghan Brooks Lorna Jantzen 79 Parents and Teens in Immigrant Families: 13 Divergent Pathways to Mobility and Assimilation Cultural Influences and Material Pressures in the New Second Generation Vappu Tyyskä Min Zhou and Jennifer Lee 84 Visualizing Canada, Identity and Belonging 17 The Second Generation in Europe among Second Generation Youth in Winnipeg Maurice Crul Lori Wilkinson 20 Variations in Socioeconomic Outcomes of Second Generation Young Adults 87 Second Generation Youth in Toronto Are Monica Boyd We All Multicultural? Mehrunnisa Ali 25 The Rise of the Unmeltable Canadians? Ethnic and National Belonging in Canada’s 90 On the Edges of the Mosaic Second Generation Michele Byers and Evangelia Tastsoglou Jack Jedwab 94 Friendship as Respect among Second 35 Bridging the Common Divide: The Importance Generation Youth of Both “Cohesion” and “Inclusion” Yvonne Hébert and Ernie Alama Mark McDonald and Carsten Quell 99 The Experience of the Second Generation of 39 Defining the “Best” Analytical Framework Haitian Origin in Quebec for Immigrant Families in Canada Maryse Potvin Anupriya Sethi 104 Creating a Genuine Islam: Second Generation 42 Who Lives at Home? Ethnic Variations among Muslims Growing Up in Canada Second Generation Young Adults Rubina Ramji Monica Boyd and Stella Y.
    [Show full text]
  • C3RF Newsletter for Mps May Issue
    Newsletter to MPs Chief Editor, Marshall Garland Contributors, Joan Felvinci and Mark Jaskela Volume Number 1, Issue Number 1, May 2017 This publication is intended for and distributed to all Members of Parliament and selected members of their staff. We welcome your feedback. Motion-103 Awareness In this issue: 1. Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms, who we are 2. An Essay on Freedom of Speech, what we stand to lose 3. Religious Apartheid Comes to Canada, a concerned Christian Canadian speaks 4. News Roundup, world events relating to our opposition of Motion- 103 Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms This newsletter for Canadian MPs is produced by Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms, a coast-to-coast grassroots organization of native-born as well as immigrant Canadians. We come from all walks of life and many diverse religious and ethnic communities. Many members of our group have long histories as human rights advocates. Our group supports the rule of law in accordance with Canadian traditions and strives to ensure freedom of expression and the equality rights of women and the LGBTQ community. We are united by our concerns about the negative impact that Motion-103 will have on Canadians' rights and freedoms currently enshrined in our Constitution. We stand together to address Member of Parliament Iqra Khalid’s Motion M-103, a motion that stands to adversely impact the ability of Canadians to express themselves freely and live without fear in a tolerant democratic society. To learn more about the Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms, please visit our web site: www.canadiancitizens.org What we are working to uphold: Canadian Rights and Freedoms from the Constitution Act 1982, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms A.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Creed Research and Consultation Report
    Human Rights and Creed Research and consultation report ISBN: 978-1-4606-3360-1 (Print) 978-1-4606-3361-8 (HTML) 978-1-4606-3362-5 (PDF) © 2013 Queen’s Printer for Ontario Available in various formats Also available online: www.ohrc.on.ca Disponible en français Human rights and creed research and consultation report Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1. Setting the context................................................................................................... 1 2. The purpose of this report........................................................................................ 2 3. Criteria for assessing and developing human rights policy ...................................... 2 II. Executive summary................................................................................................... 3 III. Background and context ......................................................................................... 7 Key questions .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Current social and demographic trends ................................................................... 7 1.1 Diversity of creed beliefs and practices.............................................................. 7 1.2 Individual belief and practice............................................................................ 10 1.3 Policy and program trends ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are You “Active”? - Voices of Young Muslim Women Post-9/11
    WHY ARE YOU “ACTIVE”? - VOICES OF YOUNG MUSLIM WOMEN POST-9/11 by Jabeen Aslam A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Graduate Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Jabeen Aslam (2011) WHY ARE YOU “ACTIVE”? - VOICES OF YOUNG MUSLIM WOMEN POST-9/11 Master of Arts 2011 Jabeen Aslam Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract Contributing to the literature on the Muslim experience post-9/11, the purpose of this study was to engage with a group that is often talked about, but not with: Muslim youth. Using an integrative anti-racist and anti-colonial approach with an emphasis on a spiritual way of knowing, this study gives voice to young Muslim activists in Toronto who have made the choice to “do something”. The study aims to understand what motivates these young activists, particularly in the context of post-9/11 Islamophobia, with the goal being to challenge stereotypical perceptions of Muslims, while contributing to the body of knowledge that aims to disrupt dominant notions of what “Canadian” identity is. The following analysis helps answer this question, which includes the role of spirituality, the attachment to Canadian identity and the desire to educate. Key challenges and what these youth prescribe for Canada’s future are also discussed. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the numerous individuals who have been instrumental in completing this project. First, to the seven young women interviewed in this paper – for your willingness to participate I am forever grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Mps on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency
    List of MPs on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency Adam Vaughan Liberal Spadina – Fort York, ON Alaina Lockhart Liberal Fundy Royal, NB Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan – Malahat – Langford, BC Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, BC Arnold Viersen Conservative Peace River – Westlock, AB Bill Casey Liberal Cumberland Colchester, NS Bob Benzen Conservative Calgary Heritage, AB Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George – Peace River – Northern Rockies, BC Carol Hughes NDP Algoma – Manitoulin – Kapuskasing, ON Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton – Melville, SK Cathy McLeod Conservative Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo, BC Celina Ceasar-Chavannes Liberal Whitby, ON Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew – Nipissing – Pembroke, ON Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON Christine Moore NDP Abitibi – Témiscamingue, QC Dan Ruimy Liberal Pitt Meadows – Maple Ridge, BC Dan Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent – Leamington, ON Dan Vandal Liberal Saint Boniface – Saint Vital, MB Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood – Transcona, MB Darrell Samson Liberal Sackville – Preston – Chezzetcook, NS Darren Fisher Liberal Darthmouth – Cole Harbour, NS David Anderson Conservative Cypress Hills – Grasslands, SK David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON David Graham Liberal Laurentides – Labelle, QC David Sweet Conservative Flamborough – Glanbrook, ON David Tilson Conservative Dufferin – Caledon, ON David Yurdiga Conservative Fort McMurray – Cold Lake, AB Deborah Schulte Liberal King – Vaughan, ON Earl Dreeshen Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • "Goodness Without Godness", with Professor Phil Zuckerman
    4 The Secular Circular Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.SBHumanists.org MAY 2017 May Program: Jacie Rowe: Final Exit Network Jacie Rowe is the Coordinator for Northern California of the Final Exit Network (FEN), a volunteer organization serving members in all 50 states who are suffering from intolerable medical circumstances, are mentally competent, want to end their lives, and who meet its official, written criteria. FEN is about end of life CHOICES. Jacie received his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science with a concentration in Law and Public Policy from the University of Louisville. He was active in politics to help pass the California End of Life Option act. Among the topics Jacie will address are the End of Life Option Act, institutional support, including hospice, statistics and polling, and the cost of medication and insurance. He points out that studies have shown that places with Death with Dignity laws find the level of hospice care actually improved with the passage of such laws. FEN believes that drawing attention to the way people die results in improved choices all around. When: Saturday, May 20th, 2017 Where: Patio Room, Vista del Monte (Park ONLY in spaces marked "VDM"). Time: Meet at 2:30pm for socializing and light refreshments provided by HSSB. Program begins at 3:00 pm Donation: $2 members/$5 non-members. Students with ID are free. Optional Buffet Dinner: Dinner buffet at Vista del Monte. $25 includes tax and tip. RSVP to Nan Cisney by 12 noon on Thursday, May 18th: [email protected] For More Info: Call 805-769-4772 (769-HSSB) 2 The HSSB Secular Circular -- May 2017 Activities the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United Remember to reserve your place for the buffet States." dinner following the Saturday program on May 20th.
    [Show full text]
  • (NCCM) 2017 ODIHR Hate Crime Report
    National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM) 2017 ODIHR Hate Crime Report Prepared by Huda Alsarraj NCCM Human Rights Officer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS About NCCM................................................................................................................................ 3 Areas of Action ............................................................................................................................. 3 Report of Hate Crimes ................................................................................................................. 4 About This Report ........................................................................................................................ 4 Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Disaggregated Figures............................................................................................................... 11 4-Year Trend ............................................................................................................................... 12 Incidents ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Verbal Attacks Against Individual(s) .................................................................................................... 13 Attacks on Property/Institutions .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Muslim Voting Guide: Federal Election 2019
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Sociology Faculty Publications Sociology Fall 2019 Canadian Muslim Voting Guide: Federal Election 2019 Jasmin Zine Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Fatima Chakroun Wilfrid Laurier University Shifa Abbas Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/soci_faculty Part of the Islamic Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Zine, Jasmin; Chakroun, Fatima; and Abbas, Shifa, "Canadian Muslim Voting Guide: Federal Election 2019" (2019). Sociology Faculty Publications. 12. https://scholars.wlu.ca/soci_faculty/12 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PREPARED BY CANADIAN ISLAMOPHOBIA INDUSTRY RESEARCH PROJECT TABLE OF C ONTENTS Summary of Federal Party Grades 1 How to Use this Guide 1 Introduction 2 Muslim Canadian Voters 2 Key Issues 2 Key Issues 1 Alt-Right Groups & Islamophobia 1 Motion 103 4 Religious Freedom and Dress in Quebec (BILL 21 & BILL 62) 3 Immigration/Refugees 4 Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) Movement 5 Foreign Policy 4 Conclusion 4 References by Section 5 The Canadian Muslim Voting Guide is led by Dr. Jasmin Zine, Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University. This guide was made possible with support from Hassina Alizai, Ryan Anningson, Sahver Kuzucuoglu, Doaa Shalabi, Ryan Hopkins and Phillip Oddi. The guide was designed by Fatima Chakroun and Shifa Abba. PAGE 01 S UMMARY OF FEDERAL PARTY GRADES Grades: P – Pass; N - Needs Improvement; F – Fail.
    [Show full text]
  • MOVING FORWARD – TOWARDS a STRONGER CANADIAN MUSEUM SECTOR Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage
    MOVING FORWARD – TOWARDS A STRONGER CANADIAN MUSEUM SECTOR Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Julie Dabrusin, Chair SEPTEMBER 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]