DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2001.07600V5 [Cs.CY] 8 Apr 2021 Leged Crisis (Lilly 2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2001.07600V5 [Cs.CY] 8 Apr 2021 Leged Crisis (Lilly 2016) The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web* Manoel Horta Ribeiro,♠;∗ Jeremy Blackburn,4 Barry Bradlyn,} Emiliano De Cristofaro,r Gianluca Stringhini,| Summer Long,} Stephanie Greenberg,} Savvas Zannettou~;∗ EPFL, Binghamton University, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University♠ College4 London, Boston} University, Max Planck Institute for Informatics r Corresponding authors: manoel.hortaribeiro@epfl.ch,| ~ [email protected] ∗ Abstract However, Manosphere communities are scattered through the Web in a loosely connected network of subreddits, blogs, We present a large-scale characterization of the Manosphere, YouTube channels, and forums (Lewis 2019). Consequently, a conglomerate of Web-based misogynist movements focused we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the underly- on “men’s issues,” which has prospered online. Analyzing 28.8M posts from 6 forums and 51 subreddits, we paint a ing digital ecosystem, of the evolution of the different com- comprehensive picture of its evolution across the Web, show- munities, and of the interactions among them. ing the links between its different communities over the years. Present Work. In this paper, we present a multi-platform We find that milder and older communities, such as Pick longitudinal study of the Manosphere on the Web, aiming to Up Artists and Men’s Rights Activists, are giving way to address three main research questions: more extreme ones like Incels and Men Going Their Own Way, with a substantial migration of active users. Moreover, RQ1: How has the popularity/levels of activity of the dif- our analysis suggests that these newer communities are more ferent Manosphere communities evolved over time? toxic and misogynistic than the older ones. RQ2: Has there been substantial migration of, or intersec- tion in, users across communities? Introduction RQ3: Has speech become more toxic and/or misogynistic over time? Online platforms are increasingly exploited to spread hate, extreme ideologies, and weaponized information, and have To answer these questions, we collect and analyze a large been repeatedly linked to radicalization leading to real- dataset with posts collected from 6 forums (6.7M posts) and world violent events (Allison 2018; Kowalski and Limber 51 subreddits (22.1M posts) related to the Manosphere. We 2013). Seemingly niche communities are often involved in annotate and categorize each forum/subreddit according to such activities; for instance, Gab, 8chan, and 4chan have all the most relevant movement (e.g., Incels, MGTOW, PUA), played a role in the apparent radicalization of individuals and study their evolution over time. Specifically, we: 1) an- that went on to alleged murderous actions (Breland 2019; alyze the evolution of the user base and of the activity in Evans 2018). Each of these communities was considered each of the different subreddits and the forums over time; niche; yet, niche does not mean unimportant. In fact, these 2) study the user migration flow across communities by ex- are often well-positioned within online cultures to have im- amining, in different subreddits, the intersection between pactful effects in the world (Nagle 2017). users in different communities; and 3) examine the toxic- Over the past few years, the Manosphere has emerged as a ity and the misogynistic content in the communities across noteworthy conglomerate of “niche” communities, roughly the years using the Perspective API (Perspective API 2018) aligned by their common interest in masculinity and its al- and a misogyny-related lexicon (Farrell et al. 2019). arXiv:2001.07600v5 [cs.CY] 8 Apr 2021 leged crisis (Lilly 2016). Communities like Pick Up Artists We find that older communities such as Men’s Rights (PUAs), Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs), Men Going Their Activists and Pick Up Artists have eventually been over- Own Way (MGTOW), and Involuntary Celibates (Incels) shadowed by new communities like Men Going Their Own have been growing in size and in their involvement in on- Way, and Incels (RQ1). Moreover, users are often active line harassment and real-world violence (Dewey 2014). across several Manosphere communities, with newer com- So far, researchers have mostly studied the Manosphere munities receiving significant migratory influxes from the through deep domain experience and immersion into the ma- older ones (RQ2). Newer communities are also appreciably terial, drawing from a tradition of diverse concepts, such as more toxic and misogynistic, which might imply a trend of techno-sociological theories (e.g., toxic disinhibition) and the Manosphere as a whole (RQ3). Overall, our work high- views on patriarchal societal constructs (Lumsden 2019; lights the importance of studying different communities at Ging 2017; Lin 2017; Farrell et al. 2019). scale, in aggregate, rather than separately, and prompts a number of possible future directions, including understand- *This paper has been accepted at the 15th International Confer- ing the reasons behind user migration movements. Code and ence on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), please cite accordingly. data are available at www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4007913. Background and Related Work hypocritical and oppressive. Her taxonomy considers 4 com- The Manosphere is loosely defined as a collection of com- munities, Men’s Rights Activists (MRA), Men Going Their munities aligned by their common interest in men’s issues, Own Way (MGTOW), Pick Up Artists (PUA), and Invol- often associated with online harassment and real-world vio- untary Celibates (Incels). According to her, while the first lence (Dewey 2014). Since the creation of the term around two communities see this “crisis in masculinity” in society, 2009 (Ben and Geoff 2009), it has been adopted by the me- which would be increasingly “feminized,” the two latter see dia and by those within the Manosphere (Ironwood 2013). the crisis in men themselves. Origins of the Manosphere. The “roots” of the Manosphere Manosphere Taxonomy. We describe the communities of can be traced back to the Men’s Liberation Movement in the Manosphere as defined by (Lilly 2016)’s taxonomy: the 60s and 70s. The movement was a critique of traditional 1. Men’s Rights Activists (MRA) focus on men-related so- male gender roles, which were seen as oppressive (Mess- cial issues and institutions, which they argue discriminate ner 1998). In the 70s, a new branch began to see the “prob- against men (Coston and Kimmel 2012). The movement lem” as stemming more from feminism and women empow- has been repeatedly labeled as misogynistic and/or hate- erment (Messner 1998). So-called Men’s Rights Activists ful (Maddison 1999; SLPC 2012). would focus on men’s issues such as military conscription, divorce, and custody laws. According to this new ideology, 2. Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) also believe women’s liberation would be inflicting on men “the worst society is rigged against men (Lin 2017). They espouse of both worlds,” and the movement’s empathetic tone turned the abandonment of women and sometimes, of western into anger (Coston and Kimmel 2012). society. The system is impossible to change, so the solu- Some of the lead figures of these movements were once tion is to “go your own way.” This is often paired with associated with second-wave feminism; Warren Farrell, for extreme anti-feminism and misogyny (Smith 2016). example, led a men’s group within the National Organiza- 3. Pick Up Artists (PUA) are a community built around tion for Women. Then, in 1993, he wrote the Myth Of Male “game:” techniques, strategies, and mindsets that help Power (Farrell 1993), which became a fundamental text to men pick up women (Lilly 2016). This often involves ob- men Men’s Rights Activists, claiming that , and not women, jectifying women and promoting harassment techniques are systematically disadvantaged in society. Farrell’s work like negging (Dewey 2014), i.e., insulting women to un- has been criticized as simplistic and insensitive to women’s dermine their confidence. The PUA community conceptu- struggle for equality (Mifflin 1993; Beasley 2005). alizes the masculinity crisis in terms of the femininization Manosphere Across the Web. Ging (2017) argues that of the man, “a fool at the hands of women” (Lilly 2016). many traditional theories on views of both masculinity and misogyny are expressed in new, impactful ways online. As 4. Involuntary Celibates (Incels) are a group, mostly of modern society has generally accepted the core ideals of young men, united by a strong feeling of rejection and gender equality, she observes an increase in “a more virulent rage towards the opposite sex. Incels rose to the main- strain of anti-feminism online,” positing that the Web’s facil- stream due to their association with mass murderers (BBC itation of information dissemination across boundaries and 2018). The community is obsessed with theories about platforms has increased the spread of extreme anti-feminist looks and relationships, and members often express a de- views, along with misogyny and violent rhetoric. sire to hurt others or themselves. Farrell et al. (2019) present a large-scale analysis of Manosphere-related subreddits with a focus on misogyny.1 Hateful and Abusive Speech. Prior work has studied how They build a lexicon from seven dictionaries related to ha- to detect and measure hate speech on the Web. Silva et al. rassment, violence, etc., and manually categorize the terms (2016) analyze the targets of hate speech in Whisper and in this meta-lexicon into one of nine misogynistic cate- Twitter by matching expressions of hate towards something. gories informed from feminist theory (e.g., “belittling,” “pa- Chandrasekharan et al. (2017) examine 100M posts and triarchy,” “physical violence,” etc.). Out of 2,454 terms, they comments from two banned subreddits, /r/fatpeoplehate and select 1,300 for their final lexicon, which is then used to /r/CoonTown, and observe user behavior on other subred- measure the prevalence of terms from each category in 5.7M dits after the ban by the number of occurrences of a set of posts across six Manosphere-related subreddits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unlikely Hegemons
    sponding to this. Employment, as wage labour, ne- Stiegler’s critique of automation is inarguably cessarily implies proletarianisation and alienation, dialectical and, in its mobilisation of the pharmakon, whereas for Marx, ‘work can be fulflling only if it impeccably Derridean. Yet it leaves unanswered – ceases to be wage labour and becomes free.’ The de- for the moment at least, pending a second volume – fence of employment on the part of the left and la- the question of the means through which the trans- bour unions is then castigated as a regressive posi- ition from employment to work might be effected. tion that, while seeking to secure the ‘right to work’, This would surely require not only the powers of in- only shores up capitalism through its calls for the dividual thought, knowledge, refection and critique maintenance of wage labour. Contrariwise, automa- that Stiegler himself affrms and demonstrates in tion has the potential to fnally release the subject Automatic Society, but also their collective practice from the alienation of wage labour so as to engage and mobilisation. What is also passed over in Stie- in unalienated work, properly understood as the pur- gler’s longer term perspectives is the issue of how suit, practice and enjoyment of knowledge. What such collective practices, such as already exist, are currently stands in the way of the realisation of ful- to respond to the more immediate and contempor- flling work, aside from an outmoded defense of em- ary effects of automation, if not through the direct ployment, Stiegler notes, is the capture of the ‘free contestation of the conditions and terms of employ- time’ released from employment in consumption, ment and unemployment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alt-Right Comes to Power by JA Smith
    USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog: Long Read Book Review: Deplorable Me: The Alt-Right Comes to Power by J.A. Smith Page 1 of 6 Long Read Book Review: Deplorable Me: The Alt- Right Comes to Power by J.A. Smith J.A Smith reflects on two recent books that help us to take stock of the election of President Donald Trump as part of the wider rise of the ‘alt-right’, questioning furthermore how the left today might contend with the emergence of those at one time termed ‘a basket of deplorables’. Deplorable Me: The Alt-Right Comes to Power Devil’s Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump and the Storming of the Presidency. Joshua Green. Penguin. 2017. Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Angela Nagle. Zero Books. 2017. Find these books: In September last year, Hillary Clinton identified within Donald Trump’s support base a ‘basket of deplorables’, a milieu comprising Trump’s newly appointed campaign executive, the far-right Breitbart News’s Steve Bannon, and the numerous more or less ‘alt right’ celebrity bloggers, men’s rights activists, white supremacists, video-gaming YouTubers and message board-based trolling networks that operated in Breitbart’s orbit. This was a political misstep on a par with putting one’s opponent’s name in a campaign slogan, since those less au fait with this subculture could hear only contempt towards anyone sympathetic to Trump; while those within it wore Clinton’s condemnation as a badge of honour. Bannon himself was insouciant: ‘we polled the race stuff and it doesn’t matter […] It doesn’t move anyone who isn’t already in her camp’.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Not So Romantic for Men
    DENNIS S. GOUWS 7. NOT SO ROMANTIC FOR MEN Using Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe to Explore Evolving Notions of Chivalry and Their Impact on Twenty-First-Century Manhood THE NEED FOR A NEW MALE STUDIES The New Male Studies offer an alternative to conventional gender-based scholarship on boys and men.1 Unlike Men’s-Studies research, which is fundamentally informed by gender feminism, New-Male-Studies research focusses on boys’ and men’s lived experiences and shares its concern about gender discrimination against all people with equity feminism.2 The New Male Studies are embodied and male positive (male affirming): their approach to manhood, which results when one “configure[s] biological masculinity to meet the particular demands of a specific culture and environmental setting,” not only celebrates males’ experience of different manhood cultures and subcultures, but also critiques—and suggests strategies for overcoming—systemic inhibitors of masculine affirmation (Ashfield, 2011, p. 28; Gilmore, 1990). An acute attentiveness to how manhood is inscribed in texts, textual criticism, and pedagogy is central to their methodology. In much of Western culture and literature, gynocentric (women-centered) and misandric (male-hating) value judgments have adversely influenced boys’ and men’s lives. For example, pervasive stereotypes of manhood that rely on gynocentric and misandric assumptions about males infer that it is acceptable to regard them as little more than pleasers, placaters, providers, protectors, and progenitors; such stereotypes assume the male body is primarily an instrument of service rather than the dignified embodiment of a sentient boy or a man (Nathanson & Young, 2001, 2006, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill Is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board
    University of Dayton eCommons Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies Women's and Gender Studies Program 2020 "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board Josh Segalewicz University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/wgs_essay Part of the Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons eCommons Citation Segalewicz, Josh, ""If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board" (2020). Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies. 20. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/wgs_essay/20 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Women's and Gender Studies Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board by Josh Segalewicz Honorable Mention 2020 Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies "If You're Ugly, The Blackpill is Born With You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board Abstract: The manosphere is one new digital space where antifeminists and men's rights activists interact outside of their traditional social networks. Incels, short for involuntary celibates, exist in this space and have been labeled as extreme misogynists, white supremacists, and domestic terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum
    Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum by Vanja Zdjelar B.A. (Hons., Criminology), Simon Fraser University, 2016 B.A. (Political Science and Communication), Simon Fraser University, 2016 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Criminology Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Vanja Zdjelar 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY FALL 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Declaration of Committee Name: Vanja Zdjelar Degree: Master of Arts Thesis title: Alone Together: Exploring Community on an Incel Forum Committee: Chair: Bryan Kinney Associate Professor, Criminology Garth Davies Supervisor Associate Professor, Criminology Sheri Fabian Committee Member University Lecturer, Criminology David Hofmann Examiner Associate Professor, Sociology University of New Brunswick ii Abstract Incels, or involuntary celibates, are men who are angry and frustrated at their inability to find sexual or intimate partners. This anger has repeatedly resulted in violence against women. Because incels are a relatively new phenomenon, there are many gaps in our knowledge, including how, and to what extent, incel forums function as online communities. The current study begins to fill this lacuna by qualitatively analyzing the incels.co forum to understand how community is created through online discourse. Both inductive and deductive thematic analyses were conducted on 17 threads (3400 posts). The results confirm that the incels.co forum functions as a community. Four themes in relation to community were found: The incel brotherhood; We can disagree, but you’re wrong; We are all coping here; and Will the real incel come forward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Male Gender Empathy Gap: Time for Psychology to Take Action
    6 “He was someone’s little boy once” THE MALE GENDER EMPATHY GAP: TIME FOR PSYCHOLOGY TO TAKE ACTION Martin Seager 1, Dr Warren Farrell 2, Dr John A. Barry 3 1 Consultant Clinical Psychologist at Southend Treatment and Recovery Service Change, Grow, Live, Southend, UK 2 Independent scholar, US 3 University College London, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, WC1E 6BT, UK Corresponding author: Dr John A. Barry University College London, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Facul- ty of Brain Sciences, London WC1E 6BT. Email: [email protected] NEW MALE STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ~ ISSN 1839-7816 ~ Vol 5, Issue 2, 2016 Pp. 6-16 © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES. 6 MALES: WHY CAN’T WE SYMPATHISE? Gender is not just an equality issue, but a diversity issue. Although differences are celebrated in every other field, in the social sciences, gender differences are denied or played down. We aren’t supposed to generalize about gender, because – in general – men and women are the same, supposedly. However as human beings, most people intuitively recognise that although men and women share many similarities, we are different in im- portant ways. For example, as described by Barry (2016), when women are depressed they might well cry, comfort eat, talk about their feelings with friends, or with a counsellor. Moreover, women seem to know when they are depressed, and when they realise it they might seek help. When men are depressed they might sleep less, become irritable, abuse drink and drugs, play video games, use sex or pornography more, become aggressive or fight (Brownhill et al, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • What Role Has Social Media Played in Violence Perpetrated by Incels?
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Peace Studies Student Papers and Posters Peace Studies 5-15-2019 What Role Has Social Media Played in Violence Perpetrated by Incels? Olivia Young Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/peace_studies_student_work Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons, Social Media Commons, Social Psychology and Interaction Commons, and the Sociology of Culture Commons Recommended Citation Young, Olivia, "What Role Has Social Media Played in Violence Perpetrated by Incels?" (2019). Peace Studies Student Papers and Posters. 1. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/peace_studies_student_work/1 This Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Peace Studies at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peace Studies Student Papers and Posters by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peace Studies Capstone Thesis What role has social media played in violence perpetrated by Incels? Olivia Young May 15, 2019 Young, 1 INTRODUCTION This paper aims to answer the question, what role has social media played in violence perpetrated by Incels? Incels, or involuntary celibates, are members of a misogynistic online subculture that define themselves as unable to find sexual partners. Incels feel hatred for women and sexually active males stemming from their belief that women are required to give sex to them, and that they have been denied this right by women who choose alpha males over them.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Feminism Discriminate Against Men? a Debate'
    H-Histsex Lauritsen on Farrell and Svoboda and Sterba, 'Does Feminism Discriminate against Men? A Debate' Review published on Thursday, May 1, 2008 Warren Farrell, J. Steven Svoboda, James P. Sterba. Does Feminism Discriminate against Men? A Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 258 pp. $39.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-19-531282-9; $17.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-19-531283-6. Reviewed by John Lauritsen (Independent Scholar) Published on H-Histsex (May, 2008) Does Feminism Cause Injustice to Men? The title of this book is not ideal, though my own may be no better. Either way, we must first define "feminism" in order to discuss whether or not it injures the rights of men. One Trotskyist group makes a distinction between "women's liberation" (good) and "feminism" (bad). Christina Hoff Sommers distinguishes between "feminism" (good) and "gender feminism" (bad).[1] Camille Paglia describes herself as "absolutely a feminist," but sharply criticizes "PC feminism."[2] Wendy McElroy distinguishes three forms: "liberal feminism" (the ideology of the 1960s); "gender feminism" (the dogmatic, men-are-the-enemy form); and "individualist feminism" (her own preferred form).[3] The trouble is that very few people observe distinctions, and are likely to end up examining both the good and the bad aspects of a single ideology. In an interview with Steven Svoboda, Warren Farrell said: "I'm a 100 percent supporter of the portions of feminism that are empowering to women and a 100 percent opponent of the portions that hone victimhood as a fine art".[4] The title of the book is also misleading, as there is no true debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Threat, Social Concerns, and Conservative Media: a Look at White America and the Alt-Right
    societies Article Status Threat, Social Concerns, and Conservative Media: A Look at White America and the Alt-Right Deena A. Isom 1,* , Hunter M. Boehme 2 , Toniqua C. Mikell 3, Stephen Chicoine 4 and Marion Renner 5 1 Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice and African American Studies Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA 2 Department of Criminal Justice, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Crime and Justice Studies, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA; [email protected] 4 Bridge Humanities Corp Fellow and Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Racial and ethnic division is a mainstay of the American social structure, and today these strains are exacerbated by political binaries. Moreover, the media has become increasingly polarized whereby certain media outlets intensify perceived differences between racial and ethnic groups, political alignments, and religious affiliations. Using data from a recent psychological study of the Alt-Right, we assess the associations between perceptions of social issues, feelings of status threat, trust in conservative media, and affiliation with the Alt-Right among White Americans. We find concern over more conservative social issues along with trust in conservative media explain a large Citation: Isom, D.A.; Boehme, H.M.; portion of the variation in feelings of status threat among White Americans. Furthermore, more Mikell, T.C.; Chicoine, S.; Renner, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Antifeminism Online. MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)
    Antifeminism Online MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) Jie Liang Lin INTRODUCTION Reactionary politics encompass various ideological strands within the online antifeminist community. In the mass media, events such as the 2014 Isla Vista killings1 or #gamergate,2 have brought more visibility to the phenomenon. Although antifeminism online is most commonly associated with middle- class white males, the community extends as far as female students and professionals. It is associated with terms such as: “Men’s Rights Movement” (MRM),3 “Meninism,”4 the “Red Pill,”5 the “Pick-Up Artist” (PUA),6 #gamergate, and “Men Going Their Own Way” (MGTOW)—the group on which I focused my study. I was interested in how MGTOW, an exclusively male, antifeminist group related to past feminist movements in theory, activism and community structure. I sought to understand how the internet affects “antifeminist” identity formation and articulation of views. Like many other antifeminist 1 | On May 23, 2014 Elliot Rodger, a 22-year old, killed six and injured 14 people in Isla Vista—near the University of California, Santa Barbara campus—as an act of retribution toward women who didn’t give him attention, and men who took those women away from him. Rodger kept a diary for three years in anticipation of his “endgame,” and subscribed to antifeminist “Pick-Up Artist” videos. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/26/justice/ california-elliot-rodger-timeline/ Accessed: March 28, 2016. 2 | #gamergate refers to a campaign of intimidation of female game programmers: Zoë Quinn, Brianna Wu and feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian, from 2014 to 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center
    Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center before the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives Dollars against Democracy: Domestic Terrorist Financing in the Aftermath of Insurrection February 25, 2021 My name is Lecia Brooks. I am chief of staff of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Now in our 50th year, the SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. SPLC lawyers have worked to shut down some of the nation’s most violent white supremacist groups by winning crushing, multimillion-dollar jury verdicts on behalf of their victims. We have helped dismantle vestiges of Jim Crow, reformed juvenile justice practices, shattered barriers to equality for women, children, the LGBTQ+ community, and the disabled, and worked to protect low-wage immigrant workers from exploitation. The SPLC began tracking white supremacist activity in the 1980s, during a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and other organized extremist hate groups. Today, the SPLC is the premier U.S. nonprofit organization monitoring the activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists. In the early 1990s, the SPLC launched its pioneering Teaching Tolerance program to provide educators with free, anti-bias classroom resources, such as classroom documentaries and lesson plans. Now renamed Learning For Justice, our program reaches millions of schoolchildren with award-winning curricula and other materials that promote understanding of our nation’s history and respect for others, helping educators create inclusive, equitable school environments.
    [Show full text]