DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2103.01965V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 2 Mar 2021 Rections to Mh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2103.01965V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 2 Mar 2021 Rections to Mh Mirror Neutron Stars Maur´ıcioHippert,1 Jack Setford,2 Hung Tan,1 David Curtin,2 Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler,1 and Nicol´asYunes1 1Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada (Dated: March 4, 2021) The fundamental nature of dark matter is entirely unknown. A compelling candidate is Twin Higgs mirror matter, invisible hidden-sector cousins of the Standard Model particles and forces. This generically predicts mirror neutron stars, degenerate objects made entirely of mirror nuclear matter. We find their structure using realistic equations of state, robustly modified based on first- principle quantum chromodynamic calculations. We predict their detectability with gravitational waves and binary pulsars, suggesting an impressive discovery potential and ability to probe the dark sector. Dark Matter makes up ∼ 85% of all matter in our particle species and bound states that interact via three universe, yet its composition and properties remain un- fundamental gauge forces plus gravity. Why should dark known. We only have gravitational information on large matter be so simple in comparison? Nothing prevents astrophysical or cosmological scales: how much of it ex- dark matter from being composed of different particle ists, along with modest bounds on self-interactions and species, endowed with their own dark forces. Next-to- more stringent bounds on interactions with Standard minimal examples including few particle species or forces Model (SM) matter [1]. These constraints are important, are being rigorously investigated [5], but dark sectors of but allow for an enormous space of possibilities. Uncover- similar complexity to the SM are underexplored. We refer ing the fundamental particle nature of dark matter would to this enticing possibility as Dark Complexity [6, 7]. solve one of the greatest mysteries of modern science. Given the lack of empirical evidence for theories like It is possible that all of dark matter is a single, ef- WIMPs or SUSY, the plausibility of complex dark mat- fectively collisionless particle species. This possibility is ter, and its potentially wildly different experimental sig- appealing not only due to its simplicity, but also because natures compared to minimal dark matter; it is imper- such dark matter candidates occur in predictive theories ative to understand the physical consequences of Dark of particle physics that extend the SM to address an a pri- Complexity. This seems daunting given the vast space of ori unrelated issue. For example, the Hierarchy Problem, possibilities, but unsolved fundamental puzzles of high- one of the most important puzzles in theoretical physics, energy particle physics can again provide guidance. is the inconsistency between the observed Higgs mass and A well-motivated example of Dark Complexity is mir- the value expected from quantum field theory. In the SM, ror matter [8, 9], a dark matter candidate related to the electroweak scale and the masses of all fundamental SM matter via a discrete symmetry. Part of dark mat- particles are set by the mass of the Higgs boson. How- ter would be made up of mirror protons, neutrons, and ever, the Higgs mass is sensitive to unknown physics at electrons: cousins of the known SM particles that do tiny distance scales, including details of quantum gravity. not interact under SM gauge forces, making them in- Quantum corrections should set the Higgs mass mH near visible. Instead, mirror matter interacts with itself via the Planck Scale ∼ 1018 GeV. This implies that all SM mirror versions of electromagnetism, the weak and strong matter collapses into black holes, and is in direct conflict forces. Just as WIMPs occur in supersymmetry, mirror with the measured value of mH ≈ 125 GeV. matter is a prediction of another solution to the Hierar- Supersymmetry (SUSY) [2] solves this problem by in- chy Problem, the Twin Higgs mechanism [9{11]. Twin troducing new particles that cancel large quantum cor- Higgs theories predict different collider signatures than arXiv:2103.01965v1 [astro-ph.HE] 2 Mar 2021 rections to mH . Minimal SUSY models predict the exis- SUSY [12, 13], evading existing constraints [3] from LHC tence of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) searches. Twin Higgs mirror matter is then an excellent that could be dark matter. The simplicity of this sce- starting point to understand Dark Complexity. Several nario implies a relationship between dark matter signa- of its predictions have already been theoretically studied tures, like atomic recoil events in direct detection ex- and will be tested in coming years [6, 7, 10, 11]. periments and the observed dark matter relic abundance We examine for the first time one of the simplest but from freeze-out. Unfortunately, the predicted direct de- most spectacular predictions: if mirror matter is part tection signals of WIMPs and collider signals of SUSY of dark matter, then the cosmos should be filled with have not yet been found [3, 4], straining this hypothesis. mirror neutron stars, invisible degenerate stellar objects The WIMP paradigm is theoretically attractive, but made entirely of mirror nucleons, analogous to SM neu- paints a picture of dark matter in stark contrast to our tron stars. These objects are a generic prediction of non- experience with SM matter. SM matter contains various minimal dark matter theories endowed with a confining 2 force similar to SM quantum chromodynamics (QCD), SM and mirror matter. While the details of these dy- but have never been studied before in realistic detail.1 namics depend on the precise parameters of mirror mat- Twin Higgs Mirror Matter { The Mirror Twin ter and remain uncertain, the endpoint of mirror-stellar- Higgs mechanism [9, 10] addresses the Hierarchy Problem evolution is, as for SM matter, relatively simple: compact by introducing a new hidden sector-copy of the SM parti- objects like neutron stars, white dwarfs, or black holes. cles and forces (see Supplementary Material Section A). Mirror neutron stars are a generic prediction of Dark As in the SM, mirror quarks form mirror proton and neu- Complexity and we investigate their properties and sig- tron bound states, coalesce into mirror nuclei, and form natures by studying the Twin Higgs benchmark model. mirror atoms with mirror electrons [11]. The symmetry At low energies, the mirror QCD sector behaves simi- relating the SM and mirror sector means that the baryo- larly to the SM QCD sector, except that renormalization genesis mechanism that generates the matter-excess of group arguments [11] imply the strong confinement scale 0 our universe should have a mirror-sector analogue, mean- ΛQCD is larger than the SM (where ΛQCD ≈ 250 MeV) 0 ing a significant fraction of DM could be in the form of by a factor of ΛQCD=ΛQCD ≈ 1:3 (1:7) for f=v = 3 (10). mirror matter. Mirror matter and SM matter have to The mirror neutron and proton masses increase accord- interact very faintly via the Higgs boson, and other fee- ingly. The pion mass is given by the fundamental quark p ble interactions could exist, but for the purposes of our masses and confinement scale, mπ / ΛQCDmq, mak- SM astrophysical discussion we can regard mirror matter as ing the mirror pion 2 (4) times heavier than mπ = 140 invisible and only detectable gravitationally. MeV for f=v = 3 (10). This allows us to predict the Earlier studies of mirror matter focused on an exact properties of mirror neutron stars. copy of SM matter (e.g. [8]). An interesting possibility, Our work focuses on this symmetric Twin Higgs bench- but not one motivated by the hierarchy problem, and mark model, but the results depend mainly on the dark many astrophysical predictions can be derived by exact confinement scale. Our analysis therefore provides in- analogy to known phenomena. In contrast, the mini- sight into other mirror-QCD scenarios with different mir- mal Mirror Twin Higgs predicts mirror matter that is a ror hadron spectra [20] as well, including scenarios with 0 SM copy, except that the vacuum expectation value f lighter mirror quark masses and hence lower ΛQCD. of the mirror Higgs is scaled up compared to the value Mirror Neutron Star Equation of State { Let for the SM Higgs v by a factor of f=v ∼ 3 − 10. The us begin by outlining a reasonable model for the equa- mirror quarks, mirror leptons, and mirror W and Z bo- tion of state (EoS) of SM neutron stars, which we can son masses are scaled up by the same factor. The lower then rescale to construct a mirror neutron star EoS. Neu- bound f=v & 3 ensures agreement with existing experi- tron stars probe different degrees of freedom depending mental constraints, including LHC Higgs coupling mea- on their radius, or equivalently their baryon density nB. surements [18]. Large values of f reduce the theory's The uncertainty increases at the core of a neutron star, ability to solve the Hierarchy Problem, making f 10 a sat sat 14 3 . where nB & 2nB , with nB ≈ 3 × 10 g=cm being reasonable upper bound. The properties of Twin Higgs the nucleon saturation density [21]. Starting from their mirror matter significantly deviate from the SM, while crust and ending at their core, their degrees of freedom being similar enough to allow for robust predictions. are thought to be: atoms, then nuclei (with increasing Just like SM matter, mirror matter would display rich mass), nuclei and free nucleons (after the neutron drip dynamics in our universe at all size scales. In the early sat line), nucleonic pasta, interacting nucleons (above nB ), universe, the presence of mirror matter gives rise to cos- then possibly hyperons, and possibly quarks (though we mological signatures like mirror-baryo-acoustic oscilla- do not consider these hypothetical phases here).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neutron Stars
    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide Neutron Stars Ordinary matter, or the stuff we and everything around us is made of, consists largely of empty space. Even a rock is mostly empty space. This is because matter is made of atoms. An atom is a cloud of electrons orbiting around a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. The nucleus contains more than 99.9 percent of the mass of an atom, yet it has a diameter of only 1/100,000 that of the electron cloud. The electrons themselves take up little space, but the pattern of their orbit defines the size of the atom, which is therefore 99.9999999999999% Chandra Image of Vela Pulsar open space! (NASA/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. What we perceive as painfully solid when we bump against a rock is really a hurly-burly of electrons moving through empty space so fast that we can't see—or feel—the emptiness. What would matter look like if it weren't empty, if we could crush the electron cloud down to the size of the nucleus? Suppose we could generate a force strong enough to crush all the emptiness out of a rock roughly the size of a football stadium. The rock would be squeezed down to the size of a grain of sand and would still weigh 4 million tons! Such extreme forces occur in nature when the central part of a massive star collapses to form a neutron star. The atoms are crushed completely, and the electrons are jammed inside the protons to form a star composed almost entirely of neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Photons from 252Cf and 241Am-Be Neutron Sources H
    Neutronenbestrahlungsraum Calibration Laboratory LB6411 Am-Be Quelle [email protected] Photons from 252Cf and 241Am-Be neutron sources H. Hoedlmoser, M. Boschung, K. Meier and S. Mayer Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland At the accredited PSI calibration laboratory neutron reference fields traceable to the standards of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Germany are available for the calibration of ambient and personal dose equivalent (rate) meters and passive dosimeters. The photon contribution to H*(10) in the neutron fields of the 252Cf and 241Am-Be sources was measured using various photon dose rate meters and active and passive dosimeters. Measuring photons from a neutron source involves considerable uncertainties due to the presence of neutrons, due to a non-zero neutron sensitivity of the photon detector and due to the energy response of the photon detectors. Therefore eight independent detectors and methods were used to obtain a reliable estimate for the photon contribution as an average of the individual methods. For the 241Am-Be source a photon contribution of approximately 4.9% was determined and for the 252Cf source a contribution of 3.6%. 1) Photon detectors 2) Photons from 252Cf and 241Am-Be neutron sources Figure 1 252Cf decays through -emission (~97%) and through spontaneous fission (~3%) with a half-life of 2.65 y. Both processes are accompanied by photon radiation. Furthermore the spectrum of fission products contains radioactive elements that produce additional gamma photons. In the 241Am-Be source 241Am decays through -emission and various low energy emissions: 241Am237Np + + with a half life of 432.6 y.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS)
    Opportunities for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) Paper submitted for the 2008 Carolina International Symposium on Neutrino Physics Yu Efremenko1,2 and W R Hix2,1 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37919, USA 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37981, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we discuss opportunities for a neutrino program at the Spallation Neutrons Source (SNS) being commissioning at ORNL. Possible investigations can include study of neutrino-nuclear cross sections in the energy rage important for supernova dynamics and neutrino nucleosynthesis, search for neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering, and various tests of the standard model of electro-weak interactions. 1. Introduction It seems that only yesterday we gathered together here at Columbia for the first Carolina Neutrino Symposium on Neutrino Physics. To my great astonishment I realized it was already eight years ago. However by looking back we can see that enormous progress has been achieved in the field of neutrino science since that first meeting. Eight years ago we did not know which region of mixing parameters (SMA. LMA, LOW, Vac) [1] would explain the solar neutrino deficit. We did not know whether this deficit is due to neutrino oscillations or some other even more exotic phenomena, like neutrinos decay [2], or due to the some other effects [3]. Hints of neutrino oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos had not been confirmed in accelerator experiments. Double beta decay collaborations were just starting to think about experiments with sensitive masses of hundreds of kilograms. Eight years ago, very few considered that neutrinos can be used as a tool to study the Earth interior [4] or for non- proliferation [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Algorithms and Coupled Neutron-Photon Transport For
    Submitted to ‘Chinese Physics C’ Improved Algorithms and Coupled Neutron-Photon Transport for Auto-Importance Sampling Method * Xin Wang(王鑫)1,2 Zhen Wu(武祯)3 Rui Qiu(邱睿)1,2;1) Chun-Yan Li(李春艳)3 Man-Chun Liang(梁漫春)1 Hui Zhang(张辉) 1,2 Jun-Li Li(李君利)1,2 Zhi Gang(刚直)4 Hong Xu(徐红)4 1 Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 2Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China 3 Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing 100084, China 4 State Nuclear Hua Qing (Beijing) Nuclear Power Technology R&D Center Co. Ltd., Beijing 102209, China Abstract: The Auto-Importance Sampling (AIS) method is a Monte Carlo variance reduction technique proposed for deep penetration problems, which can significantly improve computational efficiency without pre-calculations for importance distribution. However, the AIS method is only validated with several simple examples, and cannot be used for coupled neutron-photon transport. This paper presents improved algorithms for the AIS method, including particle transport, fictitious particle creation and adjustment, fictitious surface geometry, random number allocation and calculation of the estimated relative error. These improvements allow the AIS method to be applied to complicated deep penetration problems with complex geometry and multiple materials. A Completely coupled Neutron-Photon Auto-Importance Sampling (CNP-AIS) method is proposed to solve the deep penetration problems of coupled neutron-photon transport using the improved algorithms. The NUREG/CR-6115 PWR benchmark was calculated by using the methods of CNP-AIS, geometry splitting with Russian roulette and analog Monte Carlo, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.1 the Neutron-To-Proton Ratio
    M. Pettini: Introduction to Cosmology | Lecture 8 PRIMORDIAL NUCLEOSYNTHESIS Our discussion at the end of the previous lecture concentrated on the rela- tivistic components of the Universe, photons and leptons. Baryons (which are non-relativistic) did not figure because they make a trifling contribu- tion to the energy density. However, from t ∼ 1 s a number of nuclear reactions involving baryons took place. The end result of these reactions was to lock up most of the free neutrons into 4He nuclei and to create trace amounts of D, 3He, 7Li and 7Be. This is Primordial Nucleosynthesis, also referred to as Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). 8.1 The Neutron-to-Proton Ratio Before neutrino decoupling at around 1 MeV, neutrons and protons are kept in mutual thermal equilibrium through charged-current weak interactions: + n + e ! p +ν ¯e − p + e ! n + νe (8.1) − n ! p + e +ν ¯e While equilibrium persists, the relative number densities of neutrons and protons are given by a Boltzmann factor based on their mass difference: n ∆m c2 1:5 = exp − = exp − (8.2) p eq kT T10 where 10 ∆m = (mn − mp) = 1:29 MeV = 1:5 × 10 K (8.3) 10 and T10 is the temperature in units of 10 K. As discussed in Lecture 7.1.2, this equilibrium will be maintained so long as the timescale for the weak interactions is short compared with the timescale of the cosmic expansion (which increases the mean distance between parti- cles). In 7.2.1 we saw that the ratio of the two rates varies approximately as: Γ T 3 ' : (8.4) H 1:6 × 1010 K 1 This steep dependence on temperature can be appreciated as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why to Go Beyond the Discovery of the Higgs Boson
    How and Why to go Beyond the Discovery of the Higgs Boson John Alison University of Chicago http://hep.uchicago.edu/~johnda/ComptonLectures.html Lecture Outline April 1st: Newton’s dream & 20th Century Revolution April 8th: Mission Barely Possible: QM + SR April 15th: The Standard Model April 22nd: Importance of the Higgs April 29th: Guest Lecture May 6th: The Cannon and the Camera May 13th: The Discovery of the Higgs Boson May 20th: Problems with the Standard Model May 27th: Memorial Day: No Lecture June 3rd: Going beyond the Higgs: What comes next ? 2 Reminder: The Standard Model Description fundamental constituents of Universe and their interactions Triumph of the 20th century Quantum Field Theory: Combines principles of Q.M. & Relativity Constituents (Matter Particles) Spin = 1/2 Leptons: Quarks: νe νµ ντ u c t ( e ) ( µ) ( τ ) ( d ) ( s ) (b ) Interactions Dictated by principles of symmetry Spin = 1 QFT ⇒ Particle associated w/each interaction (Force Carriers) γ W Z g Consistent theory of electromagnetic, weak and strong forces ... ... provided massless Matter and Force Carriers Serious problem: matter and W, Z carriers have Mass ! 3 Last Time: The Higgs Feild New field (Higgs Field) added to the theory Allows massive particles while preserve mathematical consistency Works using trick: “Spontaneously Symmetry Breaking” Zero Field value Symmetric in Potential Energy not minimum Field value of Higgs Field Ground State 0 Higgs Field Value Ground state (vacuum of Universe) filled will Higgs field Leads to particle masses: Energy cost to displace Higgs Field / E=mc 2 Additional particle predicted by the theory. Higgs boson: H Spin = 0 4 Last Time: The Higgs Boson What do we know about the Higgs Particle: A Lot Higgs is excitations of v-condensate ⇒ Couples to matter / W/Z just like v X matter: e µ τ / quarks W/Z h h ~ (mass of matter) ~ (mass of W or Z) matter W/Z Spin: 0 1/2 1 3/2 2 Only thing we don’t (didn’t!) know is the value of mH 5 History of Prediction and Discovery Late 60s: Standard Model takes modern form.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron-Proton Effective Range Parameters and Zero- Energy Shape Dependence
    BNL-73899-2005-IR Neutron-proton effective range parameters and zero- energy shape dependence Robert W. Hackenburg June 2005 XXX Physics Department XXX Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 www.bnl.gov Managed by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 This is a preprint of a paper intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the author. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DRAFT Neutron-proton effective range parameters and zero-energy shape dependence R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Physics of Neutron Stars
    The Nuclear Physics of Neutron Stars Exotic Beam Summer School 2015 Florida State University Tallahassee, FL - August 2015 J. Piekarewicz (FSU) Neutron Stars EBSS 2015 1 / 21 My FSU Collaborators My Outside Collaborators Genaro Toledo-Sanchez B. Agrawal (Saha Inst.) Karim Hasnaoui M. Centelles (U. Barcelona) Bonnie Todd-Rutel G. Colò (U. Milano) Brad Futch C.J. Horowitz (Indiana U.) Jutri Taruna W. Nazarewicz (MSU) Farrukh Fattoyev N. Paar (U. Zagreb) Wei-Chia Chen M.A. Pérez-Garcia (U. Raditya Utama Salamanca) P.G.- Reinhard (U. Erlangen-Nürnberg) X. Roca-Maza (U. Milano) D. Vretenar (U. Zagreb) J. Piekarewicz (FSU) Neutron Stars EBSS 2015 2 / 21 S. Chandrasekhar and X-Ray Chandra White dwarfs resist gravitational collapse through electron degeneracy pressure rather than thermal pressure (Dirac and R.H. Fowler 1926) During his travel to graduate school at Cambridge under Fowler, Chandra works out the physics of the relativistic degenerate electron gas in white dwarf stars (at the age of 19!) For masses in excess of M =1:4 M electrons becomes relativistic and the degeneracy pressure is insufficient to balance the star’s gravitational attraction (P n5=3 n4=3) ∼ ! “For a star of small mass the white-dwarf stage is an initial step towards complete extinction. A star of large mass cannot pass into the white-dwarf stage and one is left speculating on other possibilities” (S. Chandrasekhar 1931) Arthur Eddington (1919 bending of light) publicly ridiculed Chandra’s on his discovery Awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics (in 1983 with W.A. Fowler) In 1999, NASA lunches “Chandra” the premier USA X-ray observatory J.
    [Show full text]
  • Make an Atom Vocabulary Grade Levels
    MAKE AN ATOM Fundamental to physical science is a basic understanding of the atom. Atoms are comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are at the center of the atom while electrons live in lobe-shaped clouds outside the nucleus. The number of electrons usually matches the number of protons, yielding a net neutral charge for the atom. Sometimes an atom has less neutrons or more neutrons than protons. This is called an isotope. If an atom has different numbers of electrons than protons, then it is an ion. If an atom has different numbers of protons, it is a different element all together. Scientists at Idaho National Laboratory study, create, and use radioactive isotopes like Uranium 234. The 234 means this isotope has an atomic mass of 234 Atomic Mass Units (AMU). GRADE LEVELS: 3-8 VOCABULARY Atom – The basic unit of a chemical element. Proton – A stable subatomic particle occurring in all atomic nuclei, with a positive electric charge equal in magnitude to that of an electron, but of opposite sign. Neutron – A subatomic particle of about the same mass as a proton but without an electric charge, present in all atomic nuclei except those of ordinary hydrogen. Electron – A stable subatomic particle with a charge of negative electricity, found in all atoms and acting as the primary carrier of electricity in solids. Orbital – Each of the actual or potential patterns of electron density that may be formed on an atom or molecule by one or more electrons. Ion – An atom or molecule with a net electric charge due to the loss or gain of one or more electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Photon, Neutron, Proton, Electron, Gamma Ray, Carbon Ion)
    Fundamental types of radiation particle beams (Photon, Neutron, Proton, Electron, Gamma Ray, Carbon Ion) Photon This is the most common, widely used type of radiation, and is available at most treatment centers and hospitals. This is widely used to treat most cancers including known or suspect residual ACC which was not able to be removed with surgery by itself. In simple terms, it is fundamentally a very high dose X-ray beam. This is also the type of radiation beam utilized for most of the pinpoint targeted types of radiation treatments, such as CyberKnife, TomoTherapy and Novalis. Most hospitals have photon radiation available and the beam is generated by a beam accelerator device that takes up the space of a typical bedroom. Some of the newer manufacturers have developed a more compact beam accelerator, such as the CyberKnife. Neutron Neutron radiation therapy is a unique, high-LET radiation (the particles are accelerated at a very fast rate) with very specific differences in how it affects DNA in ACC cancer cells when compared to standard Photon radiation. Neutrons are produced from a large and expensive particle accelerator called a cyclotron. This high-LET (high linear-energy-transfer) radiation is also referred to as “fast neutron therapy”. Neutrons, pions and heavy ions (such as carbon, neon and argon) deposit more energy along their path than x-rays or gamma rays, thus causing more damage to the cells they hit. The cyclotron accelerator produces protons and then a series of powerful magnets bend and aim the beam to strike a beryllium target, where the interaction produces neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Neutron of Photon Induced Nuclear Reactions Rajnikant Makwana(*), S
    Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 62 (2017) 1186 Study of Neutron of Photon induced nuclear reactions Rajnikant Makwana(*), S. Mukherjee Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, INDIA - 390002 (*) Email: [email protected] Introduction sample for efficiency correction of the detector used. A well known method to use a neutron The neutrons and the photons are the main spectrum for the measurement of reaction cross radiations present in any reactor. They can open section at average neutron energy was studied various reaction channels depending on their and utilized in the present work. The nuclear energy. The major reactions for neutrons are (n, reactions for which the cross sections were γ), (n, p), (n, 2n), whereas for photons (γ, n), (γ, measured at the different neutron energies are 2n), (γ, p), etc. The studies of these reactions for given in Table 1. The measured experimental different materials are necessary for the fission results were supported with the evaluated data and fusion reactors. The generations of highly using nuclear modular codes: TALYS and reliable data are important for the updating of EMPIRE. The published work can be found in nuclear data libraries as well as the validation of the literature [1-3]. the nuclear reaction models. The present thesis work considers both the particle and radiation (n and γ) for the study of Photon induced nuclear reactions nuclear reactions. The energy region is selected In the present thesis, a new empirical for both the particles in context of nuclear formula has been developed to explain the GDR reactor applications.
    [Show full text]